Abstract
Researchers have reported that Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 reduces Cd toxicity in Hybrid Pennisetum, but understanding the interaction between plants and associated endophytes is crucial for understanding phytoremediation strategies under heavy metal stress. The current study aims to monitor the colonization patterns of GFP-labeled endophytic bacteria BM18-2 on Hybrid Pennisetum grass. Additionally, it will monitor Cd’s effect on plant bacterial colonization. Confocal laser scanning microscopy of plant roots infected with gfp tagged BM18-2 revealed that the bacterium colonised root hairs and epidermal cells at the early stage of colonization, and over time, the bacteria penetrated to the internal tissues following their colonization of the stem and leaf. The roots, stems, and leaves of H. Pennisetum grown in Cd-contaminated soil contained a higher number of bacteria than those grown in normal soil. The result of Cd translocation indicated the condensation of heavy metals in the root cells and stem, while no Cd was found in the leaf. The study will also look for the enzymatic activity of bacteria BM18-2 and use Leadmium Green AM dye to track how Cd is taken up and moved through the plant. The enzymatic activity results showed that BM18-2 can produce catalase and amylase, but did not record any cellulase or lipase activity. As a result, the pattern of useful endophytic BM18-2 colonization through H. Pennisetum grass will aid in the application and maintenance of these bacteria in farming, and it presents new opportunities for the development of innovative strategies in the fields of agriculture and biotechnology.
Keywords: Bacillus Megaterium BM18-2, Cadmium, GFP, Hybrid Pennisetum
Introduction
Endophytic bacteria are advantageous microorganisms that inhabit the inner tissue of different plant organs, such as roots, stems, leaves, seeds, and fruits, without causing any detrimental effects (Wilson 1995; Ryan et al. 2008; Pitiwittayakul et al. 2021; Al-Hawamdeh et al. 2024). The bacteria enhance plant growth by producing plant hormones such as indole-3-acetic acid, making phosphate soluble, releasing siderophores, and providing plants with resistance against both living and non-living stressors (Gaiero et al. 2013; Etesami and Maheshwari 2018; Chen et al. 2024). Additionally, some bacterial endophytes assist plants in the biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) process, which converts nitrogen gas (N2) into usable forms like ammonium and nitrate within the host plant (Bhattacharjee et al. 2008; Santi et al. 2013; Kandel et al. 2017). As a result, incorporating bacterial endophytes into agriculture has the potential to reduce chemical fertilizers used to promote crop plant growth and quality, avoid plant pathogens, and make farming more environmentally friendly in the future.
In a heavy metal-stressed environment, the interaction between microbes and plants is essential for the adaptation and survival of both organisms. Microorganisms can employ several methods to eliminate heavy metals present in the environment (Pham 2022; Pande 2022). Beneficial interactions between endophytes and plants have gradually become the focus of many studies addressing ecological restoration, such as deserts (Jain et al. 2021) and heavy metal-contaminated lands (Liu et al. 2022). Bacillus (Zhou et al. 2021; Ali et al. 2022), Enterobacter (Ghosh et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2023), and Pseudomonas (Qian et al. 2022; Xing et al. 2023) are some PGPBs that could be used for bioremediation.
Bacillus species, which are common rhizobacteria that help plants grow, have a lot of potential for cleaning up contaminated soil because they are very resistant to heavy metals (Sharma 2021). Although Bacillus strains can survive a wide range of stress conditions, one of their most useful characteristics is their ability to form spores (Qin et al. 2022; Zocca et al. 2022). This enables their application in agriculture as PGPB inoculants (Ngalimat et al. 2021; Pham 2022). As stated by Ali et al. (2022) and Yu et al. (2023), Bacillus can lower the amount of exchangeable Cd in rhizosphere soil by immobilizing Cd with anionic groups on the cell wall or by securing Cd ions both inside and outside of cells. Biosorption, bioaccumulation, and bioprecipitation are the most common heavy metal removal strategies of the genus Bacillus (Ontañon 2018; Kumawat 2021; Khan 2022). Thus far, numerous research studies have documented the assistance of plant growth-promoting Bacillus spp. bacteria in plant phytoremediation (Glick 2010; Sessitsch 2013; Wang 2021). Researchers have found Bacillus megaterium, one of the most studied bacteria, to be common in soils contaminated with metals (Abdelkrim et al. 2018). Researchers have characterized B. megaterium’s metal tolerance for metals like Ni (Rajkumar et al. 2013), Cd (Han et al. 2020), Pb (Han et al. 2020), Cu, and Zn (Abdelkrim et al. 2018). Researchers in Portugal isolated Bacillus megaterium strain STB1 from the rhizosphere soil of a polluted estuarine environment. This strain can encourage the germination and early growth of many different plant species and is resistant to high salt and heavy metal concentrations. (Nascimento et al. 2019). When Cd was present, Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 worked well to improve the growth of Hybrid Pennisetum (Wu et al. 2019).
Green fluorescentt protein (GFP)-labeled bacteria were successfully used in several studies to follow the bacterial endophyte colonization pathways through the plant tissues and organs (Liu et al. 2006; Fan et al. 2012; Qiao et al. 2017). Liu et al. (2006) observed that the GFP-labeled B. megaterium (C4) could enter the maize roots through the cracks in the lateral root junction openings and then penetrate to the vascular tissues following migration to stems and leaves, while rice colonization occurred through the root tip in the zone of elongation and differentiation and the junctions between the primary and lateral roots. On the other hand, (GFP)-labeled Paenibacillus sp. (B1) was found to colonize root surfaces, epidermal and cortical tissue of maize (Li et al. 2017).
A little plant species has the ability to accumulate high levels of heavy metals in their tissues, which are called hyperaccumulators (Krämer 2010; Tian et al. 2017). Hybrid Pennisetum grass was produced by hybridization of Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke and Pennisetum purpureum Schumach and was characterized by high yield production and improved forage quality compared to the parent species (Premaratne and Premalal 2006; Li et al. 2016). In addition, the plant also showed a high resistance ability to adverse conditions such as salinity and heavy metal toxicity (Li et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2019). Therefore, exploring the heavy metal accumulation process in the different parts of plants will help in explaining the physiological and genetic variation associated with plant adaption to heavy metal stress (Alonso-Blanco et al. 2009; Krämer 2010), as well as improving plant phytoremediation strategies for toxic metals (Chaney et al. 2007).
In our previous study, Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 isolated from Hybrid Pennisetum showed promising ability to improve plant growth and Cd tolerance of Hybrid Pennisetum grass in pot and field experiments (Wu et al. 2019). Therefore, the present study focuses on constructing a GFP-labeled BM18-2 isolate and inoculating GFP-labeled bacteria to Hybrid Pennisetum seedlings in order to track the spread of bacterial cells in plants in the presence or absence of Cd. The purpose of these trials is to evaluate the plant-bacteria association’s potential for applicability in a metal-contaminated environment. In addition to observing Cd translocation through different parts of the plant and evaluating the bacterial ability for enzyme production.
Materials and methods
Construction of GFP labeled BM18-2 strain
BM18-2 was examined for antibiotic sensitivity using six different antibiotics (chloramphenicol, kanamycin, rifampicin, tetracyclines, ampicillin, and spectinomycin) by the disc diffusion method (Hudzicki 2016; Mitsuhiro et al. 2001). After screening, the two bacteria were found resist chloramphenicol at concentrations of 5–10 µg/mL. This character was considered later as a screening marker for the GFP strain.
Specific protoplast transformation methods were used to obtain the GFP-tagged strain (Barg et al. 2005; Chuping et al. 2010). BM18-2 single colony was inoculated into LB liquid media comprising of (g/L) 10 tryptone, 5 yeast extract, and 5 NaCl. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.0–7.2. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, one mL of bacterial growth was transferred to 50 mL LB medium and incubated at 37 °C, 200 rpm, until late growth. The bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm, then the pellet was suspended in 10 mL of protoplast buffer with the addition of lysozyme solution (0.2 mg/mL) to the mixture and incubated at 37 °C until the bacterial liquid was clear. After that, centrifuge the solution at low speed, remove the supernatant, and leave the cells, which are protoplasts. Finally, the protoplasts were suspended in the protoplast buffer and centrifuged again. The cells were resuspended in 500 µL of protoplast buffer, and an appropriate amount of sterile glycerol was also added and dispensed in 500 µL to a 1.5 mL heart tube, stored at −70 °C.
The plasmid DNA was mixed with 100 µL of protoplasts after dissolving and placed on ice for 10–15 min. Then 300 µL of PEG-P was added, incubated for 2–3 min at room temperature, then an appropriate amount of protoplast buffer was added, mixed well, centrifuged at low speed, and removed the supernatant. The pellet was collected and resuspended in 1 mL of protoplast buffer at 28 °C for 45 min and then shaken at 200 rpm for 45 min. A 100 µL of agar overlay layer was prepared and mixed with the cell suspension, then poured into the LB plate containing the appropriate chloramphenicol antibiotic. The plate was examined for colony growth after incubation at 30 °C for 24 h.
Multiple subculture transfer was carried out to confirm the genetic stability of GFP-labeled strains obtained, and the transfer is continuously performed seven times in a week. Secondary growth 12 h (24 split growth, 30 min breeding generation), a total of 168 generations, after each transfer, through the purple appearance. Subsequently, the strain is stored in sterilized glycerol at −70 °C.
Determination of GFP tagged BM18-2 colonization time for H. Pennisetum roots
The GFP-labeled BM18-2 strain was inoculated into LB broth shaken at 200 rpm at 30 °C for 24 h, centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min, then the cell pellets were suspended in sterile distilled water and adjusted to an OD600 of 0.3. Hybrid Pennisetum seedlings at appropriate stages of growth were collected, and their roots were washed well under tap water, then immersed in a bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.3), and incubated at 26 ± 2 °C. After that, the seedling roots were surface sterilized using sodium hypochlorite (1%, v/v) for 5 min, washed three times with sterile water, and the root samples were examined for GFP bacterial colonization at different intervals (0, 4, 10, 24, 48, and 72 h) using fluorescentt microscopy (ZEISS Axioscope 5 Upright Microscope).
Effect of bacterial concentration on H. Pennisetum colonization during Cd stress
Two concentrations of the GFP-labeled BM18-2 strain were prepared (OD600, 0.3 and 0.6) after bacterial growth on LB broth at 200 rpm at 30 °C for 24 h. The bacterial culture was divided into two flasks, and their concentration was adjusted to OD600 (0.3 and 0.6) by diluting with LB broth. For each concentration, about 40 seedlings of H. Pennisetum were prepared and soaked for 48 h at 26 ± 2 °C, and the control seedlings were immersed in LB only. The plant seedlings were then transplanted in the pots arranged in the greenhouse. CK1, including control seedlings in soil without Cd, and CK2, for control seedlings transplanted in 50 mg/kg Cd soil, while the bacterially inoculated seedlings were divided into two groups, the first transplanted in Cd-uncontaminated soil and the other in 50 mg/kg Cd-contaminated soil. The experiment extended for 4 weeks, and the plant samples were collected every week and surface sterilized to check the bacterial colonization in root, stem, and leaf using fluorescentt microscopy (ZEISS Axioscope 5 Upright Microscope). Additionally, the bacterial counts were also determined every week. Samples from root, stem, and leaf were surface sterilized using sodium hypochlorite (1%, v/v) for 5 min, washed three times with sterile water, and then ground in a sterilized mortar. The plant extract (100 µL) was spread over LB plates and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Three replicates of three independent plating assays were used to determine the average colonization value.
Monitoring Cd translocation through H. Pennisetum
The root, stem, and leaf of H. Pennisetum seedlings treated with or without 40 µM Cd for 4, 10, 24, and 48 h were stained using the Leadmium™ Green AM dye. The plant samples were immersed in 20 mM Na2-EDTA for 15 min at room temperature, then washed in ddH2O three times for 10 min each time. A stock solution of the dye was made by adding 50 µL dimethyl sulfoxide to a vial of the dye and then diluted to 1:10 with 0.85% NaCl (Zhao et al. 2013). The samples were immersed in the diluted stock solution at 37 °C for 2 h in the dark, then washed with 0.85% NaCl three times. And finally stored in the dark at 4 °C until investigation by confocal laser scanning microscopy with excitation wavelengths of 488 nm and a barrier filter of 590/50 nm.
Determination of bacterial enzyme activity
The enzymatic activities were carried out by growing the bacterial isolates in LB broth, then after incubation for 24 h at 30 °C on a rotating shaker (200 rpm), aliquots of 100 µL were inoculated on the specific culture media for each enzyme to be investigated.
For the catalase enzyme the cultures were mixed with 3–4 drops of H2O2 in test tubes to observe the effervescence. The Amylase enzyme was detected by spreading 100 µl of bacterial culture to LB media supplemented with 1% soluble starch, and after incubation for 48 h at 30 °C, the plates were flooded with 1% iodine. Lipase was detected by streaking the bacteria on LB media supplemented with 1% of previously sterilized tween80. After incubation for 72 h at 30 °C, the plates were observed for halo zone formation. Cellulase enzyme was determined by inoculating the bacteria to Carboxylmethyl cellulose agar containing (g/l) KH2PO4 1, MgSO4.7H2O 0.5, NaCl 0.5, FeSO4.7H2O 0.01, MnSO4.H2O 0.01, NH4NO3 0.3, CMC 10, and agar 15. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. After that, the agar medium was flooded with Congo red (1% w/v) and investigated for clear zone formation. The Enzymatic Index (EI) was expressed by the relationship between the average diameter of the degradation halo zone and the average diameter of the bacterial colony growth (Hankin and Anagnostakis 1975; Dogan and Taskin 2021).
Statistical analysis
The finding data were analyzed using the IPM SPSS20 statistical program. The data were summarized using the mean, standard deviation, and one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). To identify significant differences among the data, the Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) was conducted.
Results
Construction of GFP labeled BM18-2 strain
For selecting the suitable genetic transformation technique for BM18-2. The bacterium was investigated for the presence of endogenous plasmids, and the result indicated that BM18-2 did not contain any plasmids. Therefore, three transformation methods were examined: electroporation method [1], chemical competent transformation method [2], and protoplasm for finally determining a stable transformation method.
A total of 127 transformants were picked by chemical transformation using electroporation, but there were three transformant forms, which were similar to wild-type BM18-2, and there were the same. Further verification showed that the transformants were all false positives and could not fluoresce. Consequently, the plastid transformation method, through the preparation and transformation of multiple protoplasts, was applied, and finally obtained 16 transforming marker bacteria that can fluoresce (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Green fluorescentt protein labeled Bacillus megaterium (GFP-BM18-2) prepared by the plastid transformation technique
Determination of GFP tagged BM18-2 colonization time for H. Pennisetum root
Colonization of the internal cells of H. Pennisetum root by GFP-labeled BM18-2 was investigated at different intervals of time. The results indicated the absence of GFP bacteria in the interior of the root cells after 4 and 10 h (Fig. 2B and C), with the bacteria only visible on the root’s outer surface. However, few bacterial cells were investigated in the root tissue after 24 h (Fig. 2D), while several bacterial cells were observed clearly and remained for more than 48 h (Fig. 2E and F). Moreover, GFP bacteria displayed root hairs and epidermal cells of the seedling root at the early stage of colonization, and over time, they also appeared in the cortical cells.
Fig. 2.
Colonization of the GFP-labeled BM18-2 bacterial cells in Hybrid Pennisetum root at different time, A. Control, B. 4 h, C. 10 h, D. 24 h, E. 48 h and F. 72 h
Effect of bacterial concentration on H. Pennisetum colonization during Cd stress
The ability of endophytic BM18-2 to colonize H. Pennisetum seedlings on a long-term pattern was investigated in the presence and absence of Cd toxicity (Figs. 3 and 4). Figure 4 was demonstrated that the colonization in the plant roots reached the intercellular spaces and intracellular tissue, including the vascular bundles, following migration to the stem and leaf during the experimental period. The bacterial colonization inside the H. Pennisetum seedlings inoculated with OD600 = 0.3 of GFP was investigated. The results revealed that in the case of Cd-free soil, GFP bacteria accumulated mainly in the roots (46 × 102 CFU/g FW) until the fourth week (86 × 102 CFU/g FW) (Table 1), while little bacterial counts were recorded in the stem and leaf (222 and 104 × 10 CFU/g FW) after the first week and then decreased to 14 and 18 CFU/g FW at the end of the experiment. In contrast, the colonization of bacteria differed in the Cd-contaminated soil, where the high count of GFP bacterial strain recorded after the first week in the root, stem, and leaf was 67 × 102, 10 × 102, and 24 × 102 CFU/g FW, respectively, and then decreased gradually to reach 104 and 218 CFU/g FW in the stem and leaf, respectively, while remaining high in the root at 24 × 102 CFU/g FW (Table 1).
Fig. 3.
Colonization of GFP labeled BM18-2 in the root of H. Pennisetum seedlings grown in Cd free soil after A. 1 week, B. 2 week, C. 3 week and D. 4 week of bacterial inoculation, F. Control plant root
Fig. 4.
Colonization of GFP labeled BM18-2 in the root, stem and leaf of H. Pennisetum seedlings grown in Cd contaminated soil, A. control root, B. control stem, C. control leaf, D. root, E. stem and F. leaf after 1 week and G. root H. stem and I. leaf after 4 week of bacterial inoculation
Table 1.
Showed the mean log of GFP labeled BM18-2 counts in root, stem and leaf of H. Pennisetum in root
| Groups | 1 w | 2 w | 3 w | 4 w | P value < 0.05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | |||||
| A | 6668.3aA | 2608bD | 1668.3dC | 2371.0cC | < 0.001** |
| B | 16,013aD | 5000bA | 2610dB | 4617.6cB | < 0.001** |
| C | 4641bB | 2800cC | 2713cA | 8571aA | < 0.001** |
| D | 2069bC | 4151aB | 109.33dD | 1093cD | < 0.001** |
| P Value < 0.05 | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | |
| Stem | |||||
| A | 1024.6aB | 151.3 cD | 222.0bA | 104.7dA | < 0.001** |
| B | 1427.0aA | 299.7bB | 37.3dC | 84.0cB | < 0.001** |
| C | 222.0aC | 439.0bA | 10.0dD | 14.7cC | < 0.001** |
| D | 248.5 aC | 189.5 bC | 61.33 cB | 8.3dC | < 0.001** |
| P Value < 0.05 | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | |
| leaf | |||||
| A | 2368.5aB | 32.0dC | 383.3bA | 218.7cA | < 0.001** |
| B | 2520.7aA | 195.0bA | 8.0cD | 14.0cB | < 0.001** |
| C | 1040.0aC | 26.7bC | 28.7bC | 18.3cB | < 0.001** |
| D | 131.5aD | 86.0bB | 42.7cB | 7.7dC | < 0.001** |
| P Value < 0.05 | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | < 0.001** | |
Different lower case letters indicate significant differences between time intervals (weeks) at p < 0.05
Different upper-case letters indicate significant differences between groups at p < 05
A grass inoculated with OD600 0.3 of GFP and grown in Cd contaminated soil,
B grass inoculated with OD600 0.6 of GFP and grown in Cd contaminated soil
C grass inoculated with OD600 0.3 of GFP and grown in Cd free soil,
D grass inoculated with OD600 0.6 of GFP and grown in Cd free soil. All data are the means of 3 independent biological replicates and are expressed as means ± standard deviation
The same result was reported for the bacterial concentration OD600 = 0.6. The bacteria in normal soil exhibited the root cells from the first week 21 × 102 CFU/g FW to the end of the trial 11 × 102 CFU/g FW (Table 1). However, 248 and 131 CFU/g FW were recorded in the stem and leaf after the first week and then decreased to 8 and 7 CFU/g FW in the stem and leaf after 4 weeks (Fig. 4D). On the other hand, the behavior of bacteria differed under Cd stress, where the high count of GFP bacterial strain reported after the first week in the root, stem, and leaf was 160 × 102, 14 × 102, and 25 × 102 CFU/g FW, respectively, and then decreased gradually to reach 84 and 14 CFU/g FW in the stem and leaf, respectively, but remained high in the root at 46 × 102 CFU/g FW (Table 1).
Monitoring Cd translocation through H. Pennisetum
Cd localization in the root stem and leaf of H. Pennisetum grass was investigated using Leadmium™ Green AM dye at different intervals of time (Figs. 5 and 6). At 4 h, few green colors were observed in the root, while after 10 h, the intensity of the green fluorescentt color increased gradually and was distributed through different tissues of the root until the vascular tissue at 24 h. The highest concentration of green fluorescentt color in the plant root was observed after 48 h of incubation (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Confocal laser scanning microscope images of Hybrid Pennisetum root immersed in 40 μm of Cd after 4, 10, 24 and 48 h and treated with Leadmium™ Green AM dye. The green fluorescentce refers to association of Cd with the pigment
Fig. 6.
Confocal laser scanning microscope images of Hybrid Pennisetum stem immersed in 40 μm of Cd after 24 and 48 h and treated with Leadmium™ Green AM dye. The green fluorescentce refers to association of Cd with the pigment
The green fluorescentt colors started to appear in the stem after 24 h and remain relatively with the same intensity after 48 h (Fig. 5). However, the intensity of green color in the stem is less than that detected in the root. On the other hand, the fluorescentt green color wasn’t detected in the leaf.
Determination of bacterial enzymes production ability
The results of enzymatic detection demonstrated that the endophytic BM18-2 was able to produce amylase with a clear zone formed around the bacterial colony after addition of iodine solution over the media and resulted in an enzymatic index (EI) of about 1.04 (Table 2). In addition, the bacterial ability to hydrolyze H2O2 by catalase enzymes was reported, and bubbles were formed due to the production of oxygen (O2) according to the following equation:
Table 2.
Determination of extracellular enzymatic activity of Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 *
| Term | Result | Enzymatic index (EI) |
|---|---|---|
| Amylase | + | 1.04 ± 0.04 |
| Catalase | + | 0 |
| Lipase | − | 0 |
| Cellulase | − | 0 |
* The results are expressed in mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
2 H2O2 → 2 H2O + O2.
On the other hand, the bacterial isolate BM18-2 did not show ability for lipase or cellulase enzymes, where no inhibition zones were observed in their media.
Discussion
Recently, numerous researchers have employed endophytic bacteria for plant growth promotion (PGP) to enhance their standing among agronomists and environmentalists by reducing chemical exposure into the environment (Li et al. 2016). A grass that once supported a well-known population of endophytic microorganisms will most likely pass on the microorganisms to its progeny along with any potential benefits (Ferreira 2008). In this study, Hybrid Pennisetum seedlings were successfully colonized by BM 18 − 2, which had been tagged with a GFP. The purpose of the GFP technology and microscopic analysis was to facilitate the simple identification of BM 18 − 2 colonization in the root, leaf and stem in a natural setting. The endophytic BM18-2 showed the ability to colonize plant roots and was clearly observed under the microscope after 24 h of inoculation. Although the distribution of bacterial cells was not uniform along the different root cells, it was reported that the majority of bacterial cells exhibited root hairs and epidermal cells, which may be because this region being rich in exudates (Fan et al. 2012). Liu et al. (2006) also detected that the GFP-labeled B. megaterium C4 directly penetrated the cortex of the wheat root through the epidermis in the root hair zone, and a similar mechanism can be used by the bacteria to colonize rice and maize. Liu et al. 2006 recorded the presence of Bacillus megaterium C4 cells mainly in the intracellular spaces in maize and rice. Zhang et al. 2011 demonstrated that B. subtilis N11 colonized the lateral roots of banana plant roots. The Hybrid Pennisetum roots colonized the four different endophytic bacterial strains, including Bacillus, Enterobacter, Pantoea, and Sphingomonas (Li et al. 2016). Moreover, GFP-labeled Paenibacillus sp. B1 could successfully colonize the surface and the epidermis cells of maize roots (Li et al. 2017).
After that, the BM18-2 cells were also observed in the cortical tissue. Endophytes invade the cortex, quickly pierce the epidermal rupture point, and then spread to vascular tissue. (Byregowda et al. 2022). The bacterial colonization through H. Pennisetum in the long run also reached stems and leaves, but most were still in the roots. Similar findings were found by Hallmann and Berg (2006) who demonstrated that Klebsiella aerogenes HGG15/gfp, the endophytic bacterial population decreased in above-ground tissues, such as stems and leaves, compared to roots. It was proven that one of the plant responses to metal stress is to change root structure, such as increased surface area, due to the formation of root hairs and lateral roots, which provide more active sites to be colonized by useful bacteria (Vitti et al. 2014).
The present results revealed that the colonization of endophytic BM18-2 in the H. Pennisetum grass was also affected by Cd stress, where high counts of bacteria were recorded in the root, stem, and leaf compared to the non-stress condition. This may be considered as a bacterial response mechanism against the unfavorable condition. Also, the growth of the plant inoculated with BM18-2 was greatly improved in soil contaminated with Cd compared to the non-inoculated plant, which reflects the plant growth promotion ability of endophytic BM18-2 in addition to increasing plant resistance to Cd toxicity. It was found that beneficial bacteria, under stress conditions such as salinity, drought, heavy metals, lack of a nutrient, etc., can exert a positive effect on the plant compared to non-stress conditions (Etesami and Maheshwari 2018).
Bacterial isolate BM18-2 exhibited amylase and catalase activity by producing clear halo zones and bubbles on respective agar plates. Under Cd stress, increased antioxidant levels have been observed in rice treated with different microorganisms, such as Bacillus cereus S6D1–105 (Jabeen et al. 2022). The establishment of internal colonization by endophytes relies on the surface properties of the bacteria and the enzymes that degrade plant polymers. The synthesis of cellulases, chitinases, proteases, and pectinases is significant (Carro and Menendez 2020). The extracellular enzymatic activities of endophytic bacteria also provide plants with protein and polysaccharide, which in turn improve plant nutrition (Choi et al. 2005). In the study conducted by Bhatt and Vyas (2014), rhizobacterial (PGPR) strains were isolated from the rhizospheric soils of plants growing in semi-arid regions, and the results showed that 27% of bacterial isolates produced lipase and 53% produced amylase.
Conclusion
This study sheds light on the beneficial interactions between Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 and Hybrid Pennisetum under cadmium (Cd) stress, highlighting its implications for sustainable agriculture. The study successfully traced colonization pathways from root hairs to internal tissues using GFP-labeled bacteria, highlighting the bacterium’s adaptability and its function in promoting plant growth by reducing Cd toxicity. The BM18-2 strain demonstrated encouraging characteristics that promote plant growth, such as catalase and amylase activities, which are critical for plant resilience. Furthermore, the strain’s ability to restrict Cd translocation predominantly to root tissues underscores its potential to diminish Cd accumulation in edible plant parts. This redistribution not only safeguards the aerial portions of the plant, which are essential for biomass and quality, but also establishes BM18-2 as an intriguing option for phytoremediation strategies that aim to contain heavy metals in contaminated soils. The cumulative findings of this study position B. megaterium BM18-2 as a stress-resistant and versatile PGPB for biotechnological and agricultural applications. It is recommended that additional research be conducted on molecular pathways to enhance our understanding of the absorption and transport of Cd in plants, thereby facilitating the development of advanced phytoremediation strategies. Such studies could open the path for the creation of advanced microbial consortia and bioinoculants that maximize phytoremediation attempts and improve crop resilience in soils contaminated with heavy metals.
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through Project Number (TU-DSPP-2024-53).
Author contributions
Conceptualization, N.K. ; C.Q. ; H.H. ; J.W. ; Z.L. ; and X .Z. ; methodology, N.K. ; C.Q.; and A.E.E.; software, N.K. ;formal analysis, N.K. ; C.Q. ; H.H. ; J.W. ; Z.L. ; X .Z. ; and O.M.G.; investigation, O.M.G. ; Z.O., A .S. ; A.E.E.; and A.F.S; resources N.K.; O.M.G. ; Z.O.; A .S. ; A.E.E.; and A.F.S.; data curation N.K.; O.M.G. ; Z.O.; A .S. ; A.E.E.; A.F.S.; writing—Original and editing N.K. and A.F.S ; writing—review and editing, N.K. ; C.Q. ; H.H. ; J.W. ; Z.L. ; X .Z. ; O.M.G. ; Z.O., A .S. ; A.E.E.; S.F.M., and A.F.S.; visualization, O.M.G. ; Z.O., A .S. ; A.E.E.; S.F.M., and A.F.S.; supervision, N.K. ; A.F.S ; C.Q. ; H.H. ; J.W. ; Z.L. ; and X .Z. and project administration, N.K. ; C.Q. ; H.H. ; J.W. ; Z.L. ; X.Z.; Z.O.; A.S., S.F.M., and A.E.E.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Pécs. This research was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-53).
Data availability
All data are presented within the article.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author contribution
Nehal Kamal and Chen Qian are both first author.
Contributor Information
Nehal Kamal, Email: nero_micro@yahoo.com.
Xiaoxian Zhong, Email: xiaoxian@jaas.ac.cn.
Ali Salem, Email: salem.ali@mik.pte.hu.
References
- Abdelkrim S, Jebara SH, Saadani O, Jebara M (2018) Potential of efficient and resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in lead uptake and plant defence stimulation in Lathyrus sativus under lead stress. Plant Biol 20:857–869. 10.1111/plb.12863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Hawamdeh F, Ayad JY, Alananbeh KM, Akash MW (2024) Bacterial endophytes and their contributions to alleviating drought and salinity stresses in wheat: a systematic review of physiological mechanisms. Agriculture 14(5):769. 10.3390/agriculture14050769 [Google Scholar]
- Ali Q, Ayaz M, Yu C, Wang Y, Gu Q, Wu H, Gao X (2022) Cadmium tolerant microbial strains possess different mechanisms for cadmium biosorption and immobilization in rice seedlings. Chemosphere 303:135206. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonso-Blanco C, Aarts MGM, Bentsink L, Keurentjes JJB, Reymond M, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef D M (2009) What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell 21:1877–1896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barg H, Malten M, Jahn M, Jahn D (2005) Protein and vitamin production in Bacillus megaterium. In: Barredo J-L (ed) Microbial process and products. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 205–223 [Google Scholar]
- Bhatt PV, Vyas BRM (2014) Screening and characterization of plant growth and health promoting Rhizobacteria. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(6):139–155 [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharjee RB, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay SN (2008) Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: prospects and challenges. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80:199–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byregowda R, Prasad SR, Oelmuller SR, Nataraja R, Prasanna Kumar KN MK (2022) Is endophytic colonization of host plants a method of alleviating drought stress? Conceptualizing the hidden world of endophytes. Int J Mol Sci 23(16):9194. 10.3390/ijms23169194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carro L, Menendez E (2020) Knock, knock-let the bacteria in: enzymatic potential of plant associated bacteria. In: Sharma V, Salwan R et al (eds) Molecular aspects of plant beneficial microbes in agriculture. Elsevier, London, pp 169–178 [Google Scholar]
- Chaney RL, Angle JS, Broadhurst CL, Peters CA, Tappero RV, Sparks DL (2007) Improved understanding of hyperaccumulation yields commercial phytoextraction and phytomining technologies. J Environ Qual 36:1429–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y, Li S, Chen X, Li Y, Yan C, Wang C, Wang Y, Xu H (2024) Enhanced cd activation by Coprinus comatus endophyte Bacillus thuringiensis and the molecular mechanism. Environ Pollut 342:123052. 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi YW, Hodgkiss IJ, Hyde KD (2005) Enzyme production by endophytes of Brucea javanica. J Agric Tech 1:55–66 [Google Scholar]
- Chuping L, Xiaoyu W, Zhiyi C et al (2010) The operon structure and biological activity of the lipopeptide antibiotic Bacillomycin L in Bacillus subtilis Bs916 sex. C Agri Sci 43(22):4624–4634 [Google Scholar]
- Dogan G, Taskin B (2021) Hydrolytic enzymes producing bacterial endophytes of some Poaceae plants. Pol J Microbiol 70(3):297–304. 10.33073/pjm-2021-026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etesami H, Maheshwari DK (2018) Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156:225–246. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan B, Borriss R, Bleiss W, Wu X (2012) Gram-positive Rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 colonizes three types of plants in different patterns. J Microb 50(1):38–44. 10.1007/s12275-012-1439-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira A, Quecine MC, Lacava PT, Oda S, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL (2008) Diversity of endophytic bacteria from Eucalyptus species seeds and colonization of seedlings by Pantoea agglomerans. FEMS Micro-biol Lett 287:8–14. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01258.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100(9):1738–1750. 10.3732/ajb.1200572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh A, Pramanik K, Bhattacharya S, Mondal S, Ghosh SK, Ghosh PK, Maiti TK (2021) Abatement of arsenic-induced phytotoxic effects in rice seedlings by an arsenic resistant Pantoea dispersa strain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:1633–21649. 10.1007/s11356-020-11816-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glick BR (2010) Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 28:367–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallmann J, Berg G (2006) Spectrum and population dynamics of bacterial root endophytes. In: Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–31. 10.1007/3-540-33526-9_2 [Google Scholar]
- Han H, Cai H, Wang X, Hu X, Chen Z, Yao L (2020) Heavy metal-immobilizing bacteria increase the biomass and reduce the Cd and Pb uptake by pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) in heavy metal-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 195:110375. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hankin L, Anagnostakis SL (1975) The use of solid media for detection of enzyme production by fungi. Mycologia 67(3):597–607 [Google Scholar]
- Hudzicki J (2016) Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 1–23 [Google Scholar]
- Itaya M, Shaheduzzaman SM, Matsui K, Omori A, Tsuji T (2001) Green marker for colonies of Bacillus subtilis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 65(3):579–583. 10.1271/bbb.65.579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jabeen Z, Irshad F, Habib A, Hussain N, Sajjad M, Mumtaz S, Rehman S, Haider W, Hassan MN (2022) Alleviation of cadmium stress in rice by inoculation of Bacillus cereus. PeerJ 10:e13131. 10.7717/peerj.13131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jain R, Bhardwaj P, Pandey SS, Kumar S (2021) Arnebia euchroma, a plant species of cold desert in the Himalayas, harbors beneficial cultivable endophytes in roots and leaves. Front Microbiol 12:696667–696683. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.696667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kandel SL, Joubert PM, Doty SL SL (2017) Bacterial endophyte colonization and distribution within plants. Microorganisms 5(4):77. 10.3390/microorganisms5040077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan M, Ijaz M, Chotana GA, Murtaza G, Malik A, Shamim S (2022) Bacillus altitudinis MT42a188: a potential agent for zinc bioremediation. Bioremediat J 26:228–248. 10.1080/10889868.2021.1927973 [Google Scholar]
- Krämer U (2010) Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 61:517–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumawat TK, Kumawat V, Sharma S, Kandwani N, Biyani M (2021) Applications of EPS in environmental bioremediations. In: Nadda AK, Sajna KV, Sharma S (eds) Microbial exopolysaccharides as Novel and significant biomaterials, 1st edn. Springer, Cham, pp 285–302 [Google Scholar]
- Li X, Geng X, Xie R, Fu L, Jiang J, Gao L, Sun J (2016) The endophytic bacteria isolated from elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) promote plant growth and enhance salt tolerance of Hybrid Pennisetum. Biotechnol Biofuels 9(1):190–202. 10.1186/s13068-016-0592-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Liu X, Hao T, Chen S (2017) Colonization and maize growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates. Int J Mol Sci 18:1253–1269. 10.3390/ijms18071253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Zhao H, Chen S (2006) Colonization of maize and rice plants by strain Bacillus megaterium C4. Curr Microbiol 52:186–190. 10.1007/s00284-005-0162-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu CJ, Lin H, Dong YB, Li B (2022) Increase of P and Cd bioavailability in the rhizosphere by endophytes promoted phytoremediation efficiency of Phytolacca acinosa. J Hazard Mater 431:128546. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nascimento FX, Hernández AG, Glick BR, Rossi MJ (2019) Plant growth-promoting activities and genomic analysis of the stress-resistant Bacillus megaterium STB1, a bacterium of agricultural and biotechnological interest. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 25:e00406. 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngalimat MS, Yahaya RSR, Baharudin MMA-a, Yaminudin SM, Karim M, Ahmad SA, Sabri S (2021) A review on the biotechnological applications of the operational group Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Microorganisms 9(3):614. 10.3390/microorganisms9030614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ontañon OM, Fernandez M, Agostini E, González PS (2018) Identification of the main mechanisms involved in the tolerance and bioremediation of Cr (VI) by Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:16111–16120. 10.1007/s11356-018-1764-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pande V, Pandey SC, Sati D, Bhatt P, Samant M (2022) Microbial interventions in bioremediation of heavy metal contaminants in agroecosystem. Front Microbiol 13:824084. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.824084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pham VHT, Kim J, Chang S, Chung W (2022) Bacterial biosorbents, an efficient heavy metals green clean-up strategy: prospects, challenges, and opportunities. Microorganisms 10:610. 10.3390/microorganisms10030610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitiwittayakul N, Wongsorn D, Tanasupawat S (2021) Characterisation of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria from sugarcane and their antagonistic activity against Fusarium moniliforme. Trop Life Sci Res 32:97–118. 10.21315/tlsr2021.32.3.6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Premaratne S, Premalal GG (2006) Hybrid Napier (Pennisetum perpureum × Pennisetum americarnum) var CO-3: a resourceful fodder grass for dairy development in Sri Lanka. J Agric Sci 2:22–33 [Google Scholar]
- Qian X, Lu Q, He X, Wang Y, Li H, Xiao Q, Zheng X, Lin R (2022) Pseudomonas sp. TCd-1 significantly alters the rhizosphere bacterial community of rice in Cd contaminated paddy field. Chemosphere 290:133257. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiao J, Yu X, Liang X, Liu Y, Borriss R, Lium Y (2017) Addition of plant-growth-promoting Bacillus subtilis PTS-394 on tomato rhizosphere has no durable impact on composition of root microbiome. BMC Microbiol 17:131–143. 10.1186/s12866-017-1039-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin Y, Angelini LL, Chai Y (2022) Bacillus subtilis cell differentiation, biofilm formation and environmental prevalence. Microorganisms 10(6):1108. 10.3390/microorganisms10061108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajkumar M, Ma Y, Freitas H (2013) Improvement of Ni phytostabilization by inoculation of Ni resistant Bacillus megaterium SR28C. J Environ Manage 128:973–980. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278:1–9. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111:743–767. 10.1093/aob/mct048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, Puschenreiter M (2013) The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 60:182–194. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma P (2021) Efficiency of bacteria and bacterial assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals: an update. Bioresour Technol 328:124835. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian S, Xie R, Wang H, Hu Y, Hou D, Liao X, Brown PH, Yang H, Lin X, Labavitch JM, Lu L (2017) Uptake, sequestration and tolerance of cadmium at cellular levels in the hyperaccumulator plant species Sedum alfredii. J Exp Bot 68(9):2387–2398. 10.1093/jxb/erx112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitti A, Nuzzaci M, Scopa A, Tataranni G, Tamburrino I, Sofo A (2014) Hormonal response and root architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to heavy metals. Inte J Plant Biol 5:5226–5232 [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Rinklebe J, Tack FM, Hou D (2021) A review of green remediation strategies for heavy metal contaminated soil. Soil Use Manag 37:936–963. 10.4081/pb.2014.5226 [Google Scholar]
- Wang X, Xu Q, Hu K, Wang G, Shi K (2023) A coculture of Enterobacter and Comamonas species reduces cadmium accumulation in rice Mol. Plant Microbe Interact 36(2):95–108. 10.1094/MPMI-09-22-0186-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson D (1995) Endophyte: the evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos 73(2):274–276 [Google Scholar]
- Wu J, Kamal N, Hao H, Liu Z, Qian C, Shao Y, Zhong Z, Xu B (2019) Endophytic Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 mutated for cadmium accumulation and improving plant growth in Hybrid Pennisetum. Biotechnol Rep 24(e00374):1–9. 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xing Y, Liu S, Tan S, Jiang Y, Luo X, Hao X, Huang Q, Chen W (2023) Core species derived from multispecies interactions facilitate the immobilization of cadmium Environ Sci Technol 57(12):4905–4914. 10.1021/acs.est.3c00486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu X, Zhao J, Ding Z, Xiong F, Liu X, Tian J, Wu N (2023) Cadmium-absorptive Bacillus vietnamensis 151-6 reduces the grain cadmium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.): potential for cadmium bioremediation Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 254:114760. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang N, Wu K, He X, Li SQ, Zhang ZH et al (2011) A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization of Bacillus subtilis N11. Plant Soil 344:87–97. 10.1007/s11104-011-0729-7 [Google Scholar]
- Zhao FY, Hu F, Zhang SY, Wang K, Zhang CR, Liu T (2013) MAPKs regulate root growth influencing auxin signaling and cell cycle-related gene expression in cadmium-stressed rice. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:5449–5460. 10.1007/s11356-013-1559-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X, Liu X, Zhao J, Guan F, Yao D, Wu N, Tian J (2021) The endophytic bacterium Bacillus koreensis 181–22 promotes rice growth and alleviates cadmium stress under cadmium exposure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105(21–22):8517–8529. 10.1007/s00253-021-11613-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zocca VFB, Corrêa GG, Lins MRDCR, de Jesus VN, Tavares LF, Amorim LADS, Kundlatsch GE, Pedrolli DB (2022) The CRISPR toolbox for the gram-positive model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Crit Rev Biotechnol 42(6):813–826. 10.1080/07388551.2021.1983516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data are presented within the article.





