Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1976 Feb 1;153(2):297–307. doi: 10.1042/bj1530297

Studies by electron-paramagnetic-resonance spectroscopy and stopped-flow spectrophotometry on the mechanism of action of turkey liver xanthine dehydrogenase.

M J Barber, R C Bray, D J Lowe, M P Coughlan
PMCID: PMC1172575  PMID: 179533

Abstract

Studies by e.p.r. (electron-paramagnetic-resonance) spectroscopy and by stopped-flow spectrophotometry on turkey liver xanthine dehydrogenase revealed strong similarities to as well as important differences from the Veillonella alcalescens xanthine dehydrogenase and milk xanthine oxidase. The turkey enzyme is contaminated by up to three non-functional forms, giving molybdenum e.p.r. signals designated Resting I, Resting II and Slow. Slow and to a lesser extent Resting I signals are like those from the Veillonella enzyme, whereas Resting II is very like a resting signal described by K. V. Rajagopolan, P. Handler, G. Palmer & H. Beinert (1968) (J. Biol. Chem. 243, 3784-3796) for aldehyde oxidase. Another non-functional form that gives the Inhibited signal is produced on treatment of the enzyme with formaldehyde. Stopped-flow measurements at 450 nm show that, as for the milk enzyme, reduction by xanthine is rate-limiting in enzyme turnover. The active enzyme gives rise to Very Rapid and Rapid molybdenum(V) e.p.r. signals, as well as to an FADH signal. That these signals are almost indistinguishable from those of the milk enzyme, confirms the similarities between the active sites. There are two types of iron-sulphur centres that give signals like those in the milk enzyme, though with slightly different parameters. Quantitative reduction titration of the functional enzyme with xanthine revealed two important differences between the turkey and the milk enzymes. First, the turkey enzyme FADH/FADH2 system has a redox potential sufficiently low that xanthine is incapable of reducing the flavin completely. This finding presumably explains the very low oxidase activity. Secondly, whereas the Fe/S II chromophore in the milk enzyme has a relatively high redox potential, for the turkey enzyme the value of this potential is lower and similar to that of its Fe/S I chromophore.

Full text

PDF
297

Images in this article

304Fig. 8.
on p.304

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRAY R. C., PETTERSSON R., EHRENBERG A. The chemistry of xanthine oxidase. 7. The anaerobic reduction of xanthine oxidase studied by electron-spin resonance and magnetic susceptibility. Biochem J. 1961 Oct;81:178–189. doi: 10.1042/bj0810178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branzoli U., Massey V. Evidence for an active site persulfide residue in rabbit liver aldehyde oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1974 Jul 25;249(14):4346–4349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Branzoli U., Massey V. Preparation of aldehyde oxidase in its native and deflavo forms. Comparison of spectroscopic and catalytic properties. J Biol Chem. 1974 Jul 25;249(14):4399–4345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray R. C., Vänngård T. "Rapidly appearing" molybdenum electron-paramagnetic-resonance signals from reduced xanthine oxidase. Biochem J. 1969 Oct;114(4):725–734. doi: 10.1042/bj1140725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleere W. F., Coughlan M. P. Avian xanthine dehydrogenases. I. Isolation and characterization of the turkey liver enzyme. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1975 Feb 15;50(2B):311–322. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(75)90280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cleere W. F., Coughlan M. P. Turkey liver xanthine dehydrogenase. Reactivation of the cyanide-inactivated enxyme by sulphide and by selenide. Biochem J. 1974 Nov;143(2):331–340. doi: 10.1042/bj1430331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cleere W. F., Mulhern J. F., Coughlan M. P. Avian xanthine dehydrogenases. II. Accumulation of intermediates during the oxidation of purines by the turkey liver enzyme: calculation of the concentration of each component during the reaction. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1975 Feb 15;50(2B):323–329. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(75)90281-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cleere W. F., O'Regan C., Coughlan M. P. Turkey liver xanthine dehydrogenase: properties of the enzyme dependent on the content of functional active sites. Biochem J. 1974 Nov;143(2):465–468. doi: 10.1042/bj1430465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dalton H., Lowe D. J., Pawlik T., Bray R. C. Studies by electron-paramagnetic-resonance spectroscopy on the mechanism of action of xanthine dehydrogenase from Veillonella alcalescens. Biochem J. 1976 Feb 1;153(2):287–295. doi: 10.1042/bj1530287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hart L. I., McGartoll M. A., Chapman H. R., Bray R. C. The composition of milk xanthine oxidase. Biochem J. 1970 Mar;116(5):851–864. doi: 10.1042/bj1160851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowe D. J., Lynden-Bell R. M., Bray R. C. Spin-spin interaction between molybdenum and one of the iron-sulphur systems of xanthine oxidase and its relevance to the enzymic mechanism. Biochem J. 1972 Nov;130(1):239–249. doi: 10.1042/bj1300239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Massey V., Brumby P. E., Komai H. Studies on milk xanthine oxidase. Some spectral and kinetic properties. J Biol Chem. 1969 Apr 10;244(7):1682–1691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Massey V., Komai H., Palmer G., Elion G. B. The existence of nonfunctional active sites in milk xanthine oxidase: reaction with functional active site inhibitors. Vitam Horm. 1970;28:505–531. doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(08)60909-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGartoll M. A., Pick F. M., Swann J. C., Bray R. C. Properties of xanthine oxidase preparations dependent on the proportions of active and inactivated enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970 Sep 16;212(3):523–526. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(70)90264-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Olson J. S., Ballou D. P., Palmer G., Massey V. The mechanism of action of xanthine oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1974 Jul 25;249(14):4363–4382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olson J. S., Ballow D. P., Palmer G., Massey V. The reaction of xanthine oxidase with molecular oxygen. J Biol Chem. 1974 Jul 25;249(14):4350–4362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PALMER G., BRAY R. C., BEINERT H. DIRECT STUDIES ON THE ELECTRON TRANSFER SEQUENCE IN XANTHINE OXIDASE BY ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY. I. TECHNIQUES AND DESCRIPTION OF SPECTRA. J Biol Chem. 1964 Aug;239:2657–2666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pick F. M., McGartoll M. A., Bray R. C. Reaction of formaldehyde and of methanol with xanthine oxidase. Eur J Biochem. 1971 Jan 1;18(1):65–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rajagopalan K. V., Handler P., Palmer G., Beinert H. Studies of aldehyde oxidase by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. I. Spectra at equilibrium states. J Biol Chem. 1968 Jul 25;243(14):3784–3796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rajagopalan K. V., Handler P., Palmer G., Beinert H. Studies of aldehyde oxidase by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. II. Kinetic studies by rapid freezing. J Biol Chem. 1968 Jul 25;243(14):3797–3806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Swann J. C., Bray R. C. Multiple phases in the reduction of xanthine oxidase by substrates. Eur J Biochem. 1972 Apr 11;26(3):407–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb01781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thorneley R. N. A convenient electrochemical preparation of reduced methyl viologen and a kinetic study of the reaction with oxygen using an anaerobic stopped-flow apparatus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Mar 26;333(3):487–496. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(74)90133-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES