Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):144–157. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01886-5

Bacteria use exogenous peptidoglycan as a danger signal to trigger biofilm formation

Sanika Vaidya 1,6, Dibya Saha 2,#, Daniel K H Rode 2,#, Gabriel Torrens 3, Mads F Hansen 1,7, Praveen K Singh 1, Eric Jelli 1,4, Kazuki Nosho 2, Hannah Jeckel 2, Stephan Göttig 5, Felipe Cava 3, Knut Drescher 2,
PMCID: PMC11726461  PMID: 39753671

Abstract

For any organism, survival is enhanced by the ability to sense and respond to threats in advance. For bacteria, danger sensing among kin cells has been observed, but the presence or impacts of general danger signals are poorly understood. Here we show that different bacterial species use exogenous peptidoglycan fragments, which are released by nearby kin or non-kin cell lysis, as a general danger signal. Using microscopy and gene expression profiling of Vibrio cholerae, we find that even brief signal exposure results in a regulatory response that causes three-dimensional biofilm formation, which protects cells from a broad range of stresses, including bacteriophage predation. A diverse set of species (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis) also respond to exogenous peptidoglycan by forming biofilms. As peptidoglycan from different Gram-negative and Gram-positive species triggered three-dimensional biofilm formation, we propose that this danger signal and danger response are conserved among bacteria.

Subject terms: Biofilms, Phage biology


Peptidoglycan released by neighbouring kin or non-kin cell lysis induces physiological changes that protect from a range of stresses, including phage predation.

Main

When bacteria experience stresses that threaten their survival or inhibit their growth, protective adaptations occur on different timescales. After exposing cells to environmental stresses for several generations, genotypes with protective traits are selected. On shorter timescales, immediately after exposing cells to stress, the bacteria often sense the stress and regulate a response to survive and replicate1. It would be most advantageous for bacteria, however, if the cells could sense and respond to a threat even before they are directly exposed. Such danger sensing has been widely investigated for human immune cells, which can sense bacteria, fungi or tissue damage through many signals that range in information content from very specific to very general danger. Danger sensing has also recently been reported for bacteria to take place between kin cells24, which led us to speculate that danger sensing could be more widely used among bacteria and that there might be conserved danger signals.

While investigating the response of Vibrio cholerae to bacteriophage (phage) predation, which is of great importance for the outbreaks of the cholera disease5 and likely impacts the severity of the disease68, we discovered a general bacterial danger signal. This danger signal carries information not only about the presence of phages but also about any adverse condition causing lysis of Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria in the vicinity. Biofilms have been shown to protect bacterial cells from many environmental threats, including phage predation912. We observed a response to the general danger signal which is conserved across many bacterial species: the formation of protective biofilms.

Results

V. cholerae forms biofilms during phage exposure

To investigate and directly observe the response of V. cholerae to phages, we inoculated V. cholerae wild type (WT) cells in microfluidic chambers, flushed out non-adherent cells and then exposed them to a continuous flow of fresh Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 37 °C containing Vibriophage N4 (a T7-like lytic phage13,14) at 106 p.f.u. ml−1 (plaque-forming units per millilitre), corresponding to an initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 1. Phage infection dynamics for different media and temperatures are shown in Extended Data Fig. 1. Using confocal microscopy, we observed that many cells in flow channels that were exposed to phages lysed quickly, but the survivors continued to grow and formed three-dimensional (3D) biofilm colonies within a few hours (Fig. 1a,b). By contrast, cells that were not exposed to phages only grew as a two-dimensional (2D) cell monolayer on the surface of the channel, without forming 3D structures (Fig. 1a,b). To quantitatively distinguish 2D bacterial monolayers from 3D biofilm structures, we used computational image analysis15 to measure the entire bacterial biovolume in the channel and the biovolume with a height of more than 3 µm above the glass substrate of the flow channel. Bacterial cells exposed to phages showed an increase in the biovolume above 3 µm from the substrate, whereas in the absence of phage exposure the growth of bacterial cells was limited to less than 3 µm in height, effectively corresponding to a 2D bacterial monolayer (Fig. 1c).

Extended Data Fig. 1. Vibriophage N4 infection of V. cholerae grown in different media and temperatures.

Extended Data Fig. 1

Each graph displays the infection dynamics in liquid shaking cultures, incubated at a particular temperature (28 °C or 37 °C) and in a particular medium (M9 minimal medium with 0.5% glucose, TB, LB). For each growth condition, phages were added to the bacterial suspension at time = 0 h at different multiplicity of infection (MOI, indicated by different line colours), and OD600 was measured using a plate reader. Thick lines indicate the mean of n = 3 biological replicates and the shaded regions represent the standard deviation. In M9 medium no drop in OD600 was observed in the presence of phages, which indicates that there was no substantial phage-induced lysis. Phage-induced lysis is stronger in LB compared with TB, and stronger at 37 °C compared with 28 °C.

Source data

Fig. 1. V. cholerae forms 3D biofilms following phage exposure.

Fig. 1

a, Confocal image time series of V. cholerae (shown in yellow, constitutively expressing sfGFP) grown in a flow chamber. At time t = 0 h, cells were exposed to a continuous flow of Vibriophage N4 (phage-exposed, 106 p.f.u. ml−1, top row of images) or medium without phages (unexposed, bottom row). Bacterial cells that are continuously exposed to phages show an initial decrease in total biovolume due to phage infection, followed by growth as 3D biofilms. In the absence of phage exposure, cells grow as a surface-covering 2D lawn without 3D structure. b, Rendered images of phage-exposed (top) and unexposed (bottom) V. cholerae cells at t = 8 h. Cells are coloured according to their height H above the bottom surface of the microfluidic chamber. c, Quantification of the total bacterial biovolume (grey) and biovolume with height H > 3 µm over time, when the cells are exposed (blue, left panel) or unexposed (black, right panel) to Vibriophage N4 (106 p.f.u. ml−1). Biovolume is quantified using BiofilmQ as the volume (µm3) occupied by fluorescent bacterial cells. d, 3D biofilm formation increases with increasing phage titre. 3D biofilm formation is quantified here as the ‘biofilm biovolume fraction’, measured after 8 h. The ‘biofilm biovolume fraction’ is defined as the biovolume with height H > 3 µm, divided by the total biovolume. In panels c and d, bars are mean values of n = 3 independent biological replicates, circles indicate individual measurements and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical significances in panel d were calculated relative to the unexposed condition, using a one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) with Bonferroni’s correction; NS, not significant (P > 0.99, except for unexposed versus phage titre 103 where P = 0.67); **P = 0.0081; ****P < 0.0001.

Source data

It has been observed that when bacteria are exposed to phages for extended periods1618, mutants with increased biofilm formation are selected, because cells inside biofilms are often protected from phages due to limited mobility of phages into the biofilm and due to the obstruction of phage binding sites by the extracellular biofilm matrix10,1922. Control experiments in which the biofilms that had formed after 8 h of phage exposure were broken up into individual cells showed that the bacterial population was as sensitive to phage exposure as cells that had not previously been exposed to phages (Extended Data Fig. 2a,b). Using the crystal violet assay for quantifying the biofilm formation of the cells obtained from biofilms formed after 8 h of phage exposure, we observed that these cells showed no significant difference in biofilm formation capability compared with the WT (Extended Data Fig. 2c). Together, these control experiments indicate that phage-resistant mutants and matrix hyper-producer mutants have not arisen or did not become a substantial fraction of the population during this relatively brief exposure to phages, suggesting that the increased 3D biofilm production during a few hours of phage exposure might be a regulatory response.

Extended Data Fig. 2. 3D biofilms that formed during phage exposure for 8 h are not composed of phage-resistant cells or matrix hyper-producing cells.

Extended Data Fig. 2

a, Schematic diagram of experimental workflow: Biofilms formed by V. cholerae after 8 h of phage exposure were harvested from flow chambers and separated into individual cells by strong vortexing, followed by two washes with LB to strongly reduce the concentration of phages. These harvested cells, which still contained a low concentration of adsorbed and intracellular phages, were used for the assays described in panels b, and c. b, Harvested V. cholerae cells were transferred to a 96-well plate and either fresh LB (red line) was added, or fresh LB containing purified Vibriophage N4 virions (106 PFU mL−1, blue line) was added, followed by incubation at 37 °C with shaking for 4 h. As a control experiment, exponentially growing V. cholerae WT cells (not previously exposed to phages) were also inoculated with phages (106 PFU mL−1, black line). These experiments show that most of the cells that were harvested from biofilms after 8 h of phage-exposure were still susceptible to phage infection. Lines represent the mean of n = 3 biological replicates and shaded regions indicate standard deviations. c, Harvested V. cholerae cells were isolated as individual colonies and then cultured in 96-well plates to measure their level of biofilm matrix production using the crystal violet assay. Control strains: V. cholerae WT, ∆vpsL (lacking essential matrix component VPS), rugose strain (vpvCW240R allele, resulting in matrix hyper-production68). The matrix hyper-producing rugose strain displayed higher biofilm production than the WT and ∆vpsL strain, as described previously68. Harvested cells produced a crystal violet biofilm signal that was similar to the WT and ∆vpsL. Bars are mean values of n = 3 independent biological replicates for the rugose, WT and ∆vpsL strains, and n = 84 independent isolates that were harvested from the channels; points denote individual measurements, and error bars represent standard deviations. Statistical significances between the harvested isolates and the WT control and the rugose control were calculated using a two-sided Student’s t-test: ns = not significant (p = 0.7097), and **** is p < 0.0001.

Source data

Phage-induced lysis causes a reduction of the cell density (Fig. 1a,c), and it has previously been reported that biofilm extracellular matrix production can be upregulated at low cell density using the quorum sensing regulatory circuit in V. cholerae23. However, when we performed a systematic reduction of the bacterial seeding density in the channel, we observed that this was not sufficient for inducing 3D biofilm growth (Extended Data Fig. 3), indicating that quorum sensing is unlikely to cause the 3D biofilm growth during phage exposure. It is worth noting that measurements of the fraction of the bacterial biovolume in the flow channel that is bound within 3D biofilms (termed ‘biofilm biovolume fraction’ in Fig. 1d) for different phage concentrations resulted in a standard dose–response curve that saturates with increasing phage concentration (Fig. 1d). These findings led us to the hypothesis that the cells might sense the presence of phages and respond by forming 3D biofilms.

Extended Data Fig. 3. Reduction of the V. cholerae seeding cell density in flow chambers does not result in 3D biofilm formation in the absence of phages.

Extended Data Fig. 3

Experiments were performed at 37 °C in flow chambers through which LB medium was flowed after inoculating the channel with a bacterial seeding population of a given cell concentration, as described in the Methods section. a-d, Quantification of the total biovolume (grey bars) and biovolume with height H > 3 µm (coloured bars) of V. cholerae cells grown in microfluidic chambers with continuous flow without phages. Bacteria were diluted to different starting concentrations for seeding the flow channels: a, 108 CFU mL−1 (black; represents the same condition as Fig. 1c, unexposed); b, 107 CFU mL−1 (blue); c, 106 CFU mL−1 (purple), d, 105 CFU mL−1 (yellow). None of these different seeding concentrations resulted in substantial 3D biofilm formation, that is biovolume above H > 3 µm. Bars are mean values with individual data points denoting n = 3 biological replicates and error bars indicate the standard deviation. e, Confocal image time series of V. cholerae cells (yellow, constitutively producing sfGFP), inoculated at an initial cell density of 105 CFU mL−1, grown in the absence of phages.

Source data

Phage-free cell lysate induces biofilm formation

To test the hypothesis that V. cholerae can sense the presence of extracellular phages, we investigated how the cells might achieve this. Measurements of biofilm formation during exposure to heat-inactivated phages24 showed that these inactive virions did not induce 3D biofilm formation (Fig. 2a), suggesting that phage infection was required to induce 3D biofilm formation. To test whether not only phage infection but also phage-induced lysis was required for inducing biofilm formation, we measured the response of V. cholerae mutants lacking the trxA gene (vc0306) to active phages. TrxA is a thioredoxin that confers processivity to the T7 phage DNA polymerase25,26, which is known to be important for T7 phage replication and lysis of the host. Phage adsorption onto the cells was identical for the WT and ∆trxA mutant (Extended Data Fig. 4a). However, the ∆trxA mutant was able to grow during phage exposure (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 4b) because it underwent considerably less lysis during phage exposure, as revealed by efficiency of plating (EOP) assays (Extended Data Fig. 4c). It is worth noting that the ∆trxA mutant did not form biofilms in response to phage exposure (Fig. 2c), suggesting that cells did not respond to the phage infection directly but that cellular lysis was important for inducing biofilm formation of the non-lysed cells. To test whether cell lysis was required for inducing biofilm formation, we generated a phage-free cell lysate by sonication and observed that both the WT and the ∆trxA mutant formed 3D biofilms during exposure to lysate (Fig. 2d). Measurements of the biofilm growth dynamics during lysate exposure showed that lysate induced 3D biofilm growth already within 3 h, and the resulting biofilm morphology was identical to biofilms resulting from phage exposure (Fig. 2e). The faster 3D biofilm formation during lysate exposure (Fig. 2e), compared with phage exposure (Fig. 1c), could arise from the initial delay in generating the first cell lysis following phage exposure and the continuous reduction of biomass due to the ongoing lysis of phage-sensitive cells in the population. In addition, exposure to lysate slightly increased the bacterial growth rate (Extended Data Fig. 5a). Lysate obtained from higher cell densities also showed a higher capacity for inducing biofilm formation (Fig. 2f).

Fig. 2. V. cholerae 3D biofilm formation is induced by cell lysate.

Fig. 2

a, V. cholerae forms biofilms during exposure to active Vibriophage N4 (106 p.f.u. ml−1; see also Fig. 1d) but not when phages were inactivated by heat treatment (65 °C for 15 min). Biofilm formation is quantified as the 3D biofilm biovolume fraction (biovolume with height H > 3 µm divided by the total biovolume). Measurements were performed after 8 h of exposure to active or inactive virions. b, Following 60 min of phage exposure in liquid shaking culture with MOI = 1, the bacterial colony-forming unit count dropped substantially for the WT due to phage-induced lysis, whereas the ∆trxA mutant was unaffected by phage exposure. c, The ∆trxA mutant did not form 3D biofilms after 8 h of phage exposure (106 p.f.u. ml−1). The WT or ∆trxA mutant did not form 3D biofilms without phage exposure. d, Both the WT and ∆trxA mutant formed biofilms when exposed to a lysate obtained by sonication of WT V. cholerae cells (1010 lysed cells per ml) for 3 h. e, Quantification of the total biovolume (grey) and biovolume with height H > 3 µm, measured in the presence (blue, left panel) or absence (black, right panel) of a lysate obtained by sonication of WT V. cholerae cells (1010 lysed cells per ml). Confocal microscopy images show V. cholerae cells expressing sfGFP (displayed in yellow) after 3 h in the lysate-exposed or unexposed condition. f, Exposure to increasing concentrations of V. cholerae lysate solutions (obtained by sonication) resulted in a higher 3D biofilm biovolume fraction. In all panels (af), bars are mean values of n = 3 independent biological replicates, circles indicate individual measurements and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical significances were calculated between the groups indicated by black lines in panels ad using a two-sided Student’s t-test or relative to the unexposed condition in panel f using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction. Statistical results are given as exact P values in brackets in the graphs, or indicated using the following: NS, not significant (P > 0.99, unless specified otherwise in the figure), ****P < 0.0001.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4. The V. choleraetrxA mutant displays less lysis after phage exposure compared to the wild type.

Extended Data Fig. 4

a, Phage adsorption dynamics of V. cholerae WT and ∆trxA cells, following exposure to Vibriophage N4 (MOI = 0.001) at time = 0 min. Unadsorbed phage particles were enumerated by PFU assays and normalized by the initial phage titre at t = 0. Phage adsorption to the bacterial cells was unaffected by the trxA deletion, but the concentration of progeny phages at 16 min after phage exposure is ~100x diminished in the ∆trxA strain, compared to the WT. Points represent the mean of 3 biological replicates and error bars indicate the standard deviation. b, Growth curves in liquid shaking cultures of the WT and ∆trxA strain, either unexposed to phages, or exposed to phages with MOI = 0.2 or MOI = 2 at time = 0 h. Growth of the ∆trxA strain was only weakly affected by phages at MOI = 0.2, and at MOI = 2 there was a growth delay. In contrast, WT cells were strongly affected by phage exposure at both MOI levels. Lines represent the mean of 3 biological replicates and shaded regions indicate the standard deviation. c, The efficiency of plating (EOP) was assayed by spotting 10 µL of phage suspensions with different phage titres onto a lawn of bacterial cells on an LB agar plate, followed by incubation at 37 °C. Images were acquired using a stereomicroscope. The relative EOP was then calculated by dividing the plaque forming units (PFU) by the titre in a phage inoculation spot. The relative EOP measurements indicate that the ∆trxA strain displays severely attenuated phage-induced lysis compared to the WT. Bars are mean values, circles denote 3 biological replicates for each condition, and error bars indicate the standard deviation.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5. Growth curves of V. cholerae WT in the presence of cell lysate or peptidoglycan (PG).

Extended Data Fig. 5

Cells were inoculated at OD600 = 0.04 and incubated in liquid LB under shaking conditions. Lines represent the mean of n = 3 biological replicates and shaded regions indicate the standard deviation. a, Growth curves of V. cholerae WT either with (blue) or without (black) the addition of lysate (final concentration of 109 lysed cells mL−1). b, Growth curves of V. cholerae WT either with (blue) or without (black) the addition of PG (final concentration of 300 µg mL−1).

Source data

How does exposure to lysate cause the formation of 3D biofilms? It is conceivable that lysate could promote biofilm formation of V. cholerae cells by depositing a compound on the surface of the microfluidic channel that helps cells to attach to the surface. However, control experiments in which the surface of the flow channels was pre-treated with lysate showed that a lysate surface coating did not significantly induce biofilm formation (Extended Data Fig. 6a). Alternatively, components of the lysate could become part of the extracellular matrix to promote biofilm formation, analogous to a process that has been observed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Shewanella oneidensis, where the DNA released by cellular lysis becomes an important component of the extracellular matrix during biofilm development27,28. However, the exposure of V. cholerae to different concentrations of extracellular DNA that was purified from the lysate did not result in biofilm formation (Extended Data Fig. 6b). Furthermore, experiments in which isolated V. cholerae cells were only exposed to lysate for 10 min, before switching back to media that did not contain any lysate, showed that this very brief exposure triggered 3D biofilm formation to the same level as continuous lysate exposure (Extended Data Fig. 6c). This finding is incompatible with the hypothesis that a component of the lysate becomes an important part of the extracellular matrix during 3D biofilm growth, because the cells only grew into 3D biofilms approximately 1 h after the lysate was removed from the medium. We therefore explored the possibility that cells sense one or more components of the lysate and mount a regulated response that involves the growth into 3D biofilms.

Extended Data Fig. 6. Lysate components do not serve as a scaffold for 3D biofilm formation.

Extended Data Fig. 6

a, Treating surfaces with lysate prior to inoculation of V. cholerae cells does not cause 3D biofilm formation in flow chambers. 3D biofilm formation of V. cholerae WT was measured while the cells were either exposed to lysate (109 lysed cells mL−1) or unexposed to lysate (in this case: exposed to LB medium), for flow chambers that were treated with different conditions prior to inoculation of the bacterial cells. The flow chambers were pre-treated for 60 min with either LB, or lysate (109 lysed cells mL−1), or no pre-treatment. Pre-treating the surface of the microfluidic chambers with lysate did not significantly change 3D biofilm formation. b, V. cholerae WT cells that were exposed to varying concentrations of extracellular DNA (eDNA, isolated from V. cholerae WT lysate) did not display biofilm formation, similar to the unexposed condition. c, Exposure of V. cholerae WT cells to lysate (1010 lysed cells mL−1) for only 10 min followed by 170 min of exposure to medium without lysate, or exposure to lysate for 180 min induced similar levels of biofilm formation. For all measurements in this figure, biofilm formation was quantified by calculating the 3D biofilm biovolume fraction, which is the biovolume with height H > 3 μm divided by the total biovolume of the bacterial cells. Bars are mean values with points denoting n = 3 biological replicates for panels a,b and n = 4 biological replicates for panel c. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. For panel a-b, statistical significances were calculated using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction (ns = not significant). In panel a, p > 0.9999 for both tests. In panel b, LB-exposed vs. 40 µg/mL eDNA-exposed yielded p > 0.9999, LB-exposed vs. 4 µg/mL eDNA-exposed yielded p = 0.803, LB-exposed vs. 0.4 µg/mL eDNA-exposed yielded p = 0.941. For panel c, statistical significance was calculated using a two-sided Student’s t test, resulting in p = 0.053.

Source data

Peptidoglycan in cell lysate induces biofilm formation

To identify whether V. cholerae senses a particular component of the V. cholerae cell lysate, and what class of compound this could be, we initially tested whether V. cholerae also forms 3D biofilms in response to lysates from other Gram-negative species (Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa) and Gram-positive species (Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus). All cell lysates were obtained by sonication of 1010 cells per ml. It is worth noting that V. cholerae formed 3D biofilms following exposure to cell lysate irrespective of which bacterial species was used to generate the lysate (Fig. 3a), indicating that the biofilm-inducing signal is not particular to any given species. Treating the V. cholerae lysate with heat, DNase, RNase or proteinase K did not significantly diminish its capacity to induce 3D biofilm formation of V. cholerae (Extended Data Fig. 7). Finally, we investigated the size of the active component in the lysate using filters of different pore size. These measurements showed that the biofilm-inducing molecules have a wide range of sizes, but they are larger than 3 kDa (Fig. 3b). Together, the results from the different treatments of the lysate show that proteins or nucleic acids in the lysate do not induce 3D biofilm formation and that the active components of the lysate have a range of different sizes and are present in widely different bacterial species.

Fig. 3. Exogenous PG triggers the V. cholerae 3D biofilm formation program.

Fig. 3

a, V. cholerae (Vc) cells grew into 3D biofilms when exposed to lysate (1010 lysed cells per ml, obtained by sonication) of V. cholerae cells (blue bar; see also Fig. 2f) or lysates of other Gram-negative species (yellow bars: Ec, E. coli; Pa, P. aeruginosa) or lysates of Gram-positive species (purple bars: Bs, B. subtilis; Sa, S. aureus). Biofilm formation was quantified as the 3D biofilm biovolume fraction after 3 h of exposure to lysate (or unexposed control). b, Different fractions of a V. cholerae lysate, obtained by filtration with different pore sizes (3–300 kDa), showed reduced biofilm induction capacity for smaller filter pore sizes. The lysate was obtained by sonicating 1010 Vc cells per ml, followed by sterilization using a 0.22 µm filter, followed by fractionation with filters of different pore sizes. c, Comparison of the biofilm induction capacity of different V. cholerae lysates: lysate of WT whole cells (blue, similar to a and Fig. 2f), lysate of cells that lacked a cell wall (spheroplasts, yellow) or cell wall fragments purified from a lysate of WT whole cells (purple), relative to the unexposed condition (black). d, Exogenously added pure PG (300 µg ml−1) induced 3D biofilm formation of V. cholerae. Confocal microscopy image shows V. cholerae cells (yellow, constitutively expressing sfGFP) exposed to PG for 3 h. e, V. cholerae biofilm formation after 3 h of PG exposure increased with increasing concentration of PG. Biofilm formation was quantified as the fraction of 3D biofilm biovolume with height H > 3 µm. We estimate that a PG concentration of 300 µg ml−1, solubilized by sonication, approximately corresponds to the PG concentration in lysate of 1010 lysed cells per ml. f, V. cholerae WT cells were exposed to purified V. cholerae PG (300 µg ml−1 in LB) which was either undigested or treated with enzymes that cleave specific bonds in PG. The scheme illustrates which bonds are cleaved by each enzyme. g, Exposure of V. cholerae WT cells to PG (300 µg ml−1) for only 5 min followed by 175 min of exposure to medium without PG, or exposure to PG for 180 min induced similar levels of 3D biofilm formation. In all panels (ag), bars are mean values of n = 3 independent biological replicates, circles indicate individual measurements and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical significances were calculated as indicated by the black lines (in a, e and f) or relative to the lysate condition (in b) using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction; in panels c and g, a two-sided Student’s t-test was used. Statistical results are given as exact P values in brackets in the graphs or indicated using the following: NS, not significant (P > 0.99, unless specified otherwise in the figure), ****P < 0.0001.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7. Heat, DNase, RNase, or proteinase treatment of the cell lysate did not reduce the 3D biofilm induction capacity of cell lysate.

Extended Data Fig. 7

V. cholerae WT cells in microfluidic flow chambers were exposed to lysate of V. cholerae WT cells (obtained by sonication, 1010 lysed cells mL−1 in LB medium) which was subjected to different treatments: heat (80 °C for 20 min), DNase I (1 U mL−1 at 37 °C for 30 min), RNase A (1 µg mL−1 at 37 °C for 30 min), or proteinase K (20 µg mL−1 at 37 °C for 60 min). As control conditions, LB medium that was subjected to the same treatments was flushed into flow chambers seeded with V. cholerae WT cells. The heat or enzyme treatments did not diminish the biofilm inducing capability of the lysate. Bars are mean values of n independent biological replicates, where n is as follows for the different conditions (bar1 corresponds to the left-most bar in the graph and bar9 corresponds to the right-most bar): nbar1 = 3, nbar2 = 6, nbar3 = 3, nbar4 = 3, nbar5 = 6, nbar6 = 7, nbar7 = 3, nbar8 = 3, nbar9 = 7. Circles indicate individual measurements, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical significances were calculated using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction, with the following results: ns = not significant, where untreated lysate vs. heat-treated lysate yielded p = 0.483, untreated lysate vs. DNase-treated lysate yielded p = 0.115, untreated lysate vs. RNase-treated lysate yielded p = 0.142, untreated lysate vs. proteinase K-treated lysate yielded p = 0.0617.

Source data

To test whether cell wall fragments could be a biofilm-inducing signal, we generated cell lysate from spheroplasts, which lack a cell wall due to lysozyme treatment29, and we separately purified the cell wall from V. cholerae WT cells. While exposure to purified cell wall fragments was capable of inducing 3D biofilm formation to similar levels as the cell lysate, exposure to spheroplast lysate resulted in significantly less biofilm formation (Fig. 3c). These results show that exogenously supplied V. cholerae cell wall fragments are capable of inducing 3D biofilm formation and that there are potentially other components of the cell lysate that also induce biofilm formation. These findings were corroborated by experiments in which V. cholerae was exposed to 300 µg ml−1 purified peptidoglycan (PG) (corresponding to a lysate of ~1010 cells per ml), which can be conveniently obtained commercially (of B. subtilis origin). Exposure to purified PG resulted in 3D biofilm growth dynamics and biofilm morphology (Fig. 3d) that are similar to biofilms arising from exposure to cell lysate (Fig. 2e). PG induced 3D biofilm formation even when experiments were performed in different media and temperatures (Extended Data Fig. 8). The presence of PG neither increased nor decreased the growth rate of V. cholerae (Extended Data Fig. 5b). Furthermore, exposing V. cholerae to a higher concentration of PG resulted in a larger amount of 3D biofilm biovolume in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3e). Treatment of PG with distinct PG-degrading enzymes narrowed down the structural nature of the biofilm-inducing component (Fig. 3f): Digestion of purified V. cholerae PG with lysozyme or amidase resulted in a loss of the biofilm induction capacity, which confirms that exposure to exogenous PG is sufficient for inducing 3D biofilm formation in V. cholerae. Digests of PG with endopeptidase or lytic transglycosylase retain some biofilm induction capacity but with a significant reduction compared with undigested PG (Fig. 3f). Considering the most abundant muropeptides produced in both the lytic transglycosylase and endopeptidase digestions30, we speculate that tetrapeptide anhydro-disaccharides (either free or as part of uncrosslinked PG chains) may be the components of PG that cause biofilm induction.

Extended Data Fig. 8. Exogenous peptidoglycan induces 3D biofilm formation of V. cholerae in different media and temperatures.

Extended Data Fig. 8

V. cholerae biofilm growth in our microfluidic system was measured in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 300 µg mL−1 exogenous peptidoglycan (PG), at a particular temperature (28 °C or 37 °C) and in a particular liquid medium (M9 minimal medium with 0.5% glucose, TB, LB). As growth rates strongly differ between different media and temperatures, we measured the 3D biofilm biovolume fraction with height H > 3 µm in a given growth condition at the time of maximum biofilm height, which is a time that differed between different growth conditions. The time at which the maximum biovolume fraction at heights H > 3 µm occurs is as follows: for M9, t = 7.5-13.5 h at 28 °C and 9-11 h at 37 °C; for TB, t = 3.5-4.5 h at 28 °C and 2.5-5.0 h at 37 °C; for LB, t = 2.5-4.5 h at 28 °C and 2-3 h at 37 °C). In each growth condition, the biofilm biovolume was measured at the same time for the PG-exposed and unexposed condition. In all growth conditions, PG-exposure resulted in a statistically significant enhancement of 3D biofilm formation. Bars indicate the mean of n = 3 biological replicates, error bars indicate the standard deviation and individual data points are shown. Statistical significances were calculated using a two-sided Student’s t-test; * = p < 0.1; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001. Exact p-values are given in brackets in the figure.

Source data

To test whether exogenously added PG is a signal or whether it is used as a matrix material to promote the construction of the biofilm, we performed experiments in which we exposed V. cholerae to PG for only 5 min and observed that this brief period of exposure was sufficient for inducing 3D biofilm growth (Fig. 3g). These results confirm the hypothesis that exogenous PG is sensed by V. cholerae. These results also show that the daughter cells of the cells that were exposed to PG for 5 min continue to form biofilms, even though they did not directly get exposed to PG, suggesting that the switch to the biofilm formation phenotype is passed on to daughter cells.

Exogenous PG induces c-di-GMP and matrix production

As biofilm formation is triggered by sensing exogenous PG, this response likely involves transcriptional regulation. To characterize the regulatory response, we measured the transcriptomes of V. cholerae cells in flow chambers following 10 min of exposure to purified PG in LB medium or 10 min of exposure to LB medium without PG, using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) (Fig. 4a). By comparing these transcriptomes, we identified 325 genes that were upregulated and 70 genes that were downregulated (fold changes >2 or <−2, FDR-adjusted P < 0.05) in response to exogenous PG. The upregulated genes can be classified into several functional categories (Fig. 4b) and are listed in Source Data Fig. 4. The upregulated biofilm matrix-related genes are the vps-I and vps-II gene clusters, which encode the biosynthesis pathway for the production of Vibrio polysaccharide (VPS), an essential component of 3D V. cholerae biofilms31. Genes coding for several virulence factors, such as the tcp and mak operons, as well as hlyA and hapA, and the CBASS phage defence system were also upregulated after 10 min exposure to PG. Among the nine upregulated transcriptional regulators are HapR and RpoS, which are both linked to the regulation of matrix production32, and TfoX, which is linked to competence and DNA uptake33. It is worth noting that three genes coding for diguanylate cyclases (genes vc1370, vca0720/hnoX, vca0848) were upregulated following PG exposure (Fig. 4b). Diguanylate cyclases can increase the intracellular levels of cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) which can further increase the production of extracellular matrix components beyond VPS32,34, and a previous study has shown that ectopic expression of vc1370 or vca0848 causes biofilm formation35.

Fig. 4. The transcriptional response to exogenous PG increases c-di-GMP levels and biofilm matrix production.

Fig. 4

a, Transcriptome comparison of V. cholerae WT cells that were exposed to PG for 10 min (300 µg ml−1 in LB) or to the control condition (LB medium without PG) for the same time (n = 3 for each condition). Genes with absolute fold changes >2 and a FDR-adjusted P < 0.05 were considered to be differentially expressed (see Source Data Fig. 4 for a complete list). Genes were functionally categorized using annotations from UniProt62, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes63 and MicrobesOnline64. b, Quantification of the number of genes upregulated during 10 min of PG exposure, for different functional categories, using the same colour scheme as in a. c, Spatiotemporal measurements of a fluorescent c-di-GMP reporter in V. cholerae WT cells treated with PG-exposure (300 µg ml−1, blue) or the control condition (LB without PG, black) over 3 h. The c-di-GMP reporter was quantified as the fold change in unstable sfGFP fluorescent intensity levels normalized by the fluorescence intensity of a constitutive reporter (Ptac-mRuby3). High levels of sfGFP indicate high c-di-GMP levels (see calibration in Extended Data Fig. 9a). The spatiotemporal heat maps indicate averages of n = 5 (unexposed) and n = 8 (PG-exposed) biological replicates. d, Spatiotemporal measurements of a sfGFP-based fluorescence reporter for vps-I operon transcription in V. cholerae WT. Measurements were performed over 3 h in the presence or absence of pure PG (300 µg ml−1). The fluorescence of the sfGFP-based transcriptional reporter was normalized by the fluorescence of a constitutive reporter (Ptac-TagRFP-T). The spatiotemporal heat maps indicate averages of n = 5 (unexposed) and n = 7 (PG-exposed) biological replicates.

Source data

We used fluorescence-based reporters and live-cell confocal microscopy to test whether we could confirm the key results from the transcriptome analysis (Fig. 4c,d). To measure the level of c-di-GMP, we adapted a reporter based on three consecutive riboswitches (Bc3–Bc5 from Bacillus thuringiensis36,37) that regulate the expression of an unstable superfolder-GFP (including the LAA degradation tag) in a c-di-GMP-dependent manner, harboured on a low-copy number plasmid. When c-di-GMP is bound to the Bc3–Bc5 riboswitches, the messenger RNA coding for the unstable sfGFP can be translated, resulting in fluorescence (validation, Extended Data Fig. 9a). Using this reporter, we observed that c-di-GMP levels substantially increase in our flow chamber system following exposure to exogenous PG (Fig. 4c). Increased levels of c-di-GMP generally induce the expression of extracellular matrix genes, causing biofilm formation32,34,38. To measure the spatiotemporal expression of the vps-I operon in the presence or absence of exogenous PG, we generated a fluorescent transcriptional reporter based on the insertion of sfgfp into the native vps-I operon. These measurements revealed that vps-I transcription was increased when the cells were exposed to exogenous PG (Fig. 4d). Despite our identification of the upregulation of VPS production and increase in c-di-GMP levels, which cause 3D biofilm formation, it remains unclear how V. cholerae senses exogenous PG.

Extended Data Fig. 9. Fluorescent protein-based reporters for c-di-GMP level and for Vibriophage N4 infection in V. cholerae cells.

Extended Data Fig. 9

a, Calibration results for the c-di-GMP reporter. The reporter is based on the triple-tandem riboswitch Bc3-569, which permits the transcription of the sfGFP-LAA gene, coding for an unstable superfolder-GFP with the LAA degradation tag53. The bc3-5-sfGFP-LAA fragment was cloned into a low copy-number plasmid (pSC101*) harboured in V. cholerae. The bar graph shows the quantification of the unstable-sfGFP fluorescent intensity levels in microscopy images, normalized by the mean of the WT level, for three different strains that are known to have different levels of c-di-GMP70, which were grown in liquid shaking culture until OD600 = 0.4. The ∆4DGC strain lacks four diguanylate cyclases (∆cdgDcdgKcdgHcdgL), which are proteins that can produce c-di-GMP. The ∆2PDE strain lacks two phosophodiesterases (∆rocScdgJ), which are proteins that can degrade c-di-GMP. The cellular c-di-GMP levels were expected to be intermediate for the WT, low for the ∆4DCG mutant, and high for the ∆2PDE mutant70,71. The fluorescence levels of the unstable sfGFP correspond qualitatively to the expected c-di-GMP levels. Bars are mean values with points denoting n = 3 biological replicates and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical significances were calculated using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction, yielding p-values that are indicated in brackets in the graph underneath the * symbol. b, To construct the fluorescent protein-based reporter for Vibriophage N4 infection in V. cholerae cells, the promoter of the gene VN4_32 (encoding the major capsid protein) was identified on the Vibriophage N4 genome using PHIRE72. c, Schematic drawing of the phage infection reporter system: The phage promoter PVN4_32 was fused to mNeonGreen (cyan) and inserted at the lacZ locus on the V. cholerae chromosome. Constitutive fluorescence was achieved by engineering a Ptac-TagRFP-T (red) construct on a low-copy plasmid (pSC101*). d, Confocal microscopy image time series showing the production of mNeonGreen (cyan) during phage infection, followed by cell lysis. All cells produce TagRFP-T (red).

Source data

PG-induced biofilms protect against phages

To test whether the 3D biofilms formed in response to exogenous PG protect the cells from phage infection, we grew V. cholerae in microfluidic channels for 1 h with or without exogenous PG, followed by the addition of purified Vibriophage N4. To measure the extent of phage infection in this system, we constructed a fluorescent protein infection reporter based on the promoter of the major phage capsid protein VN4_32 (Extended Data Fig. 9b–d). These experiments showed that the cells inside biofilms, which formed as a consequence of PG exposure, are protected from phage infection (Fig. 5). Control experiments, in which 3D biofilm formation was achieved independent of PG exposure (by genetically inducing elevated c-di-GMP levels), showed that 3D biofilm formation generally protects against phage infection (Extended Data Fig. 10). Biofilms are therefore a niche where phage-susceptible bacteria can survive without the need for phage receptor mutations.

Fig. 5. Biofilm formation in response to exogenous PG protects against phage predation.

Fig. 5

Using a phage infection reporter and microscopy, the fraction of infected cells was quantified. PG-exposed cells were less susceptible to infection by 106 p.f.u. ml−1 Vibriophage N4 than unexposed cells. PG exposure was initiated at time t = 0 h, phage exposure was initiated at t = 1 h. Lines indicate the mean of biological replicates (n = 6 for PG-exposed, n = 4 for unexposed), and shaded regions represent the standard deviation. Bar graph shows the difference between PG-exposed and unexposed cells at the time of peak phage infection. Statistical significance was calculated using a two-sided Student’s t-test; ***P = 0.0007.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10. Growth curves of V. cholerae rugose strain during phage exposure in biofilm and liquid culture conditions.

Extended Data Fig. 10

The V. cholerae rugose strain (KDV1502) carries the vpvCW240R allele, resulting in matrix hyper-production1 and strong 3D biofilm formation in LB medium, even in the absence of exogenous peptidoglycan. a, Biofilms of the rugose strain were grown in flow chambers in LB medium at 37 °C for 3 h, resulting in 3D biofilm colonies. Then, at time t = 0 h, the inflowing medium was exchanged to LB containing purified phages (107 PFU mL−1), or LB containing no phages, and the biofilm biovolume was monitored using confocal microscopy and analysed using BiofilmQ. The presence of phages only had a small impact on the biofilm biovolume, indicating that the biofilm population is largely protected from phages. Thick lines indicate the mean of n = 3 biological replicates and the shaded regions represent the standard deviation. b, Liquid cultures of the rugose strain were grown in LB medium at 37 °C under shaking conditions. When back-diluting the pre-culture to OD600 = 0.01 at time t = 0 h, purified phages were added and the OD600 was monitored using a plate reader. The drop in OD600 within the first hour of co-incubation with phages indicates that the rugose strain is susceptible to phage infection (see also the phage adsorption and phage release dynamics for the wild type in Extended Data Fig. 4a, for comparison of timescales). The second drop in OD600 around 2 h may result from a second wave of phage infection. Thick lines indicate the mean of n = 3 biological replicates and the shaded regions represent the standard deviation.

Source data

PG is a danger signal across different species

As exogenous PG is not toxic for V. cholerae (Extended Data Fig. 5b), the biofilm formation response cannot be interpreted as a protective response against exogenous PG. For other species, exogenous PG can even be growth promoting39,40. The response of V. cholerae to exogenous PG is therefore qualitatively distinct from biofilm induction by cell damage-inducing compounds, such as antibiotics41,42. Exogenous PG can indicate the presence of ecological competition43, and for P. aeruginosa exogenous PG indeed induces a competition response in the form of pyocyanin secretion44. However, phage predation and abiotic stresses can also lead to the release of PG so that PG is not only a competition signal but more generally a danger signal. As there are many ways in which cells can lyse, and we found that lysate from several different species triggered V. cholerae biofilm formation (Fig. 3a), we conclude that exogenous PG is a general danger signal for V. cholerae.

Based on the results for V. cholerae, we tested whether exogenous PG could also be a danger signal for other species. We explored the response of several bacterial species to purified exogenous PG, using the same flow chamber-based cultivation system that was used for V. cholerae in Figs. 14. Our flow chamber system requires that bacterial species attach to the glass surface of the channel before stimulation with exogenous PG. As some species do not attach to glass in our particular conditions, it was not possible to test a representative set of species from the bacterial phylogenetic tree. However, several Gram-negative and distantly related Gram-positive pathogens could be assessed: P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli, S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterococcus faecalis. While the responses of E. coli and S. epidermidis were not statistically significant, all other species responded to exogenous PG by forming 3D biofilms (Fig. 6). These results show that exogenous PG is a widely used danger signal among bacteria, which triggers biofilm formation as a protective measure against various forms of biotic or abiotic stresses.

Fig. 6. Exogenous peptidoglycan is a conserved signal for inducing biofilm formation in different species.

Fig. 6

Biofilm formation of different species was quantified after 3 h of exposure to PG (300 µg ml−1, blue bars) or control conditions (medium without PG, black bars). Among the species are V. cholerae (as a control, similar to Fig. 3e–g), as well as other Gram-negative pathogens (P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, E. coli) and Gram-positive pathogens (S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. faecalis). For E. coli and S. epidermidis, the presence or absence of PG did not result in statistically significant differences in 3D biofilm formation. All other species showed enhanced 3D biofilm formation during PG exposure. Bars are mean values of n = 3 independent biological replicates, circles indicate individual measurements, and error bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistical significances were calculated using a two-sided Student’s t-test. Statistical results are given as exact P values in brackets in the graphs.

Source data

Discussion

Analogous to our finding that bacteria use exogenous PG as a danger signal, human immune cells use PG subunits as danger signals. These processes have been characterized in detail for the pattern recognition receptors NOD1 and NOD2 (ref. 45), which detect meso-diaminopimelic acid containing PG and the muramyl dipeptide, respectively. In fact, the repertoire of danger signals that have been identified for human immune cells is currently much larger than the set of danger signals that are known for bacteria4547. For P. aeruginosa, it has been observed that specifically the lysis of kin cells triggers the activation of type 6 secretion system via the Gac/Rsm signal transduction pathway2,48, yet the precise signal molecule involved in this process remains unknown. During the revision of our manuscript, it was reported that V. cholerae can respond to norspermidine released by kin cells and closely related Vibrios49. For P. aeruginosa swarms, it has also been observed that phage infection and antibiotic treatment trigger the release of the Pseudomonas quinolone signal molecule which then repels other conspecific P. aeruginosa cells in the swarm that have not been exposed to these dangers3. Analogously, phage infection of B. subtilis elicits a phage tolerance in neighbouring kin cells4. In E. coli swarms, antibiotic-induced cell lysis can release a part of a resistance-nodulation-division efflux pump that can then be used by kin cells to stimulate antibiotic efflux of existing pumps, and it induces the production of additional efflux pumps50. In contrast to these other bacterial danger-sensing systems, we found that exogenous PG is a danger signal very broadly used not only between kin cells but also between widely different species (Fig. 6). Consistent with exogenous PG being a general danger signal, the response we observed to exogenous PG, that is biofilm formation, results in a general protection against many threats to bacterial survival.

In this study, we have demonstrated that exogenous PG released by cellular lysis is a general danger signal to which several bacterial species respond by forming biofilms. The resulting biofilms serves as a refuge that protects against phage predation or other biotic and abiotic stresses that can lyse bacterial cells. Sensing exogenous PG provides cells that are in the vicinity of phages, or in the vicinity of other stresses that lead to lysis, a strategy for sensing imminent danger before direct contact with the stress. Only mechanisms that kill bacteria without lysis or by phagocytosis would prevent the release of this danger signal. The large number of genes that were upregulated or downregulated in V. cholerae in response to brief exposure to exogenous PG, including major regulatory and virulence genes, as well as phage defence genes, suggests that this danger signal could result in several additional protective phenotypes that go beyond biofilm formation. Understanding the full scope of the responses to exogenous PG promises to reveal basic new insights into bacterial stress responses and danger sensing.

Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

All V. cholerae strains used in this study are derivatives of the WT O1 biovar El Tor strain C6706. V. cholerae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, E. faecalis and A. baumannii strains were cultured in LB Miller medium (Roth) at 37 °C with shaking at 250 r.p.m. (revolutions per minute). S. epidermidis and S. aureus strains were cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 37 °C with shaking at 250 r.p.m. Tryptone broth contained 10 g l−1 tryptone and 10 g l−1 NaCl. M9 medium contained M9 minimal salts (M6030, Sigma) supplemented with 2 mM MgSO4, 100 mM CaCl2, minimum essential medium (MEM) vitamins, 15 mM triethanolamine (pH 7.1), 0.6 µM FeCl3 and 0.5% glucose. Where required, the culture medium was supplemented with the following antibiotics: gentamicin (30 µg ml−1), ampicillin (100 µg ml−1 for E. coli and 200 µg ml−1 for V. cholerae) or kanamycin (50 µg ml−1 for E. coli and 100 µg ml−1 for V. cholerae). Detailed lists of strains and plasmids are provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Plasmid construction

Plasmid construction was carried out using standard molecular biology techniques51. All enzymes for cloning were purchased from New England Biolabs or Takara Bio. Primers were designed using the SnapGene software v.4.2.11 (Insightful Science). Oligos used for plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table 3 and were synthesized by Eurofins or Sigma Aldrich. All constructed plasmids were verified by Sanger sequencing, which was carried out by Eurofins or Microsynth SeqLab.

Gene deletions in V. cholerae

To delete a chromosomal gene in V. cholerae, a plasmid based on the suicide vector pKAS32 was generated for the respective gene52. Briefly, the vector pNUT144 (a derivative of pKAS32) was amplified using oligos KDO1968 and KDO1969. Upstream and downstream, flanking regions of the gene of interest (1 kb each) were amplified with suitable oligos (listed in Supplementary Table 3) using genomic DNA of strain KDV201. The final plasmid, comprising the amplified vector backbone and inserts, was constructed by Gibson assembly. The final plasmid was harboured in E. coli S17-λ pir. This method was used to generate the plasmid pNUT2259, which was introduced into KDV428 by conjugation to create the V. choleraetrxA mutant (strain KDV2489). A similar protocol was used to generate the strains with ∆cdgDcdgKcdgHcdgL or ∆rocScdgJ mutations (strains KDV2849 and KDV2824).

Fluorescent reporter strains

For the phage infection reporter, the fragment PVN4_32-mNeonGreen was constructed. To this end, the putative promoter of the gene encoding the major capsid protein (VN4_32) was amplified from Vibriophage N4 DNA (directly from a phage lysate), using oligos KDO1519 and KDO1520. The gene encoding the fluorescent protein mNeonGreen was amplified from the plasmid pNUT1035 using primers KDO1521 and KDO1522. The two fragments were then fused together by overlap polymerase chain reaction using primers KDO1534 and KDO1535. The resulting PVN4_32-mNeonGreen fragment was digested with restriction enzymes NheI and PacI (New England Biolabs) and ligated into a similarly digested vector pNUT480 (which is a derivative of pKAS32). The resulting plasmid pNUT1532 contained the PVN4_32-mNeonGreen fragment, flanked by 1 kb regions that are homologous to the up-stream and down-stream sequences of lacZ on the chromosome. Plasmid pNUT1532 was then introduced into KDV201 by conjugation, yielding strain KDV986, in which lacZ was replaced by the PVN4_32-mNeonGreen construct. For the constitutive expression of a fluorescent protein in the phage infection reporter strain, the plasmid pNUT1475 was constructed. This plasmid has a pSC101* vector background and a gentamicin resistance cassette and includes the gene encoding the red fluorescent protein TagRFP-T under the control of a Ptac promoter. To generate this plasmid, the TagRFP-T fragment was amplified from the plasmid pNUT1442 using primers KDO1599 and KDO719, digested with BamHI and SacI (New England Biolabs) and subsequently ligated with the backbone of a similarly digested plasmid pNUT1027 to create the plasmid pNUT1475. This plasmid was harboured in an E. coli Top10 strain and introduced into KDV986 by triparental mating (including an E. coli helper strain harbouring the plasmid pRK600) to create the final strain KDV992.

To generate the c-di-GMP reporter plasmid pNUT3038, which is a riboswitch-based fluorescent protein reporter for intracellular c-di-GMP levels36, the DNA sequences encoding the naturally occurring riboswitches Bc3–Bc5 were amplified from B. thuringiensis subsp. chinensis CT-43 using oligos KDO3443 and KDO3769. The riboswitches were cloned upstream of sfGFP, which was amplified from pNUT480 using oligos KDO3445 and KDO3446 and fused with bc3-5 using overlap polymerase chain reaction. To add a constitutive fluorescent protein expression construct to the plasmid, Ptac-mRuby3 was amplified from pNUT1029 using oligos KDO3442 and KDO3552. The two amplified fragments were cloned into a low-copy-number plasmid with a pSC101* origin of replication and a gentamicin resistance cassette, whose backbone was amplified using oligos KDO3441 and KDO3828 from pNUT1029. The resulting plasmid pNUT2828 was constructed using Gibson assembly. To visualize dynamic changes in c-di-GMP, a degradation tag with amino acid sequence LAA53 was added to the sfGFP fluorescent protein. For this, the primer KDO3688 contained an overhang sequence encoding the degradation tag, which was used along with KDO3689 to amplify the Ptac-mRuby3_bc3-5-sfGFP fragment from pNUT2828. The plasmid backbone of pNUT2828 was amplified with oligos KDO3690 and KDO3691. The two fragments were fused by Gibson assembly to create the final plasmid pNUT3038. This plasmid was harboured in an E. coli Top10 strain and introduced into KDV201 by triparental mating (including an E. coli helper strain harbouring the plasmid pRK600) to create the final strain KDV2971.

Flow chamber experiments

Bacterial cells were grown in LB medium (V. cholerae, strains KDV428, KDV504, KDV992, KDV2151, KDV2489, KDV2971; P. aeruginosa, strain KDP39; E. coli, strain KDE1469, A. baumannii KDM131, E. faecalis KDM129) or TSB (S. epidermidis, strain KDM115; S. aureus, strain KDM2) overnight at 37 °C with shaking at 250 r.p.m. Day cultures were prepared by diluting the overnight cultures 1:200 in fresh medium and incubating the cultures at 37 °C under shaking conditions until optical density at 600 nm (OD600) = 0.4. These bacterial cells were inoculated into microfluidic flow chambers made from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and glass coverslips, as described in detail previously54,55. The specific protocol we used is as follows: PDMS and glass coverslips were bonded using an oxygen plasma, resulting in flow chambers that were 7,000 µm in length, 500 µm in width and 100 µm in height. The microfluidic design contained either four or eight independent channels of identical dimensions, each with its own inlet and outlet, on a single chip. The manufacturing process of these microfluidic channels guarantees highly reproducible channel dimensions and surface properties in the channels.

Following inoculation of the channels, the cells were given 1 h to attach to the glass surface of the channel without flow. For flow chamber experiments with V. cholerae cells, the microfluidic chambers were then connected via polytetrafluorethylene tubing to syringes containing LB supplemented with either (1) purified Vibriophage N4, (2) bacterial lysates, (3) isolated DNA from V. cholerae cells or (4) pure PG. For flow chamber experiments with E. coli, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and E. faecalis, the microfluidic chambers were connected to syringes containing LB supplemented with pure PG. For flow chamber experiments with S. epidermidis or S. aureus, the microfluidic chambers were connected to syringes containing TSB supplemented with pure PG. A flow of 100 µl min−1 through each microfluidic channel was then initiated for 45 s to wash away non-adherent cells. The flow rate was then set to 0.1 µl min−1 until the end of the experiment, and the flow chambers were incubated in a 37 °C incubator. Flow rates were controlled using a high-precision syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus). The channels were imaged on an inverted confocal fluorescence microscope, through the coverslip at the bottom of the microfluidic channels. For all bacterial species, confocal imaging relied on constitutively expressed fluorescent proteins, except for S. aureus (strain KDM2) and A. baumannii (strain KDM131), which was visualized by staining with 4 µM SYTO9 (Thermo Fisher, S34854) after biofilm growth.

Phage amplification, purification and inactivation

To propagate the V. cholerae bacteriophage N4 (strain ATCC 51352-B1), V. cholerae C6706 WT (KDV201) was used as the bacterial host. Phage lysates were prepared using a protocol described previously14. The specific protocol we used is as follows: Cultures of KDV201 were grown in LB at 37 °C with shaking until OD600 = 0.4 and infected with phages (from a frozen phage lysate) at a MOI of 0.1. Bacteria and phages were incubated together for 1 h or until the culture became clear, as a result of bacterial lysis following phage infection. The lysate was filtered using a 0.22 μm filter (Roth) and stored at 4 °C (for short-term storage) or −80 °C (for long-term storage). The phage titre of the lysates was ~109 p.f.u. ml−1 (as determined by a plaque assay).

For infection experiments, purified phages were used. The phage particles were purified using a previously described method56, with minor modifications. The protocol is as follows: Phage lysate was prepared by growing cultures in brain heart infusion broth until OD600 = 1.2, followed by the infection of this culture with previously prepared phage lysate at an MOI of 0.1. The resulting lysate was treated with DNase I (1 µg ml−1) for 30 min at 37 °C with shaking. NaCl was added (0.5 µg ml−1), and the treated lysate was stored at 4 °C for 1 h. The lysate was then filtered using a 0.22 μm filter (Roth), and phages were precipitated using PEG 6000 (10% w/v) for 2 days at 4 °C. The precipitated phages were collected by centrifugation at 7,800 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Phages were then purified using a CsCl density gradient column. The column was prepared using the CsCl:PBS ratios described for T7 E. coli phage in the product manual of the T7 Select Novagen kit and centrifuged at 100,000 × g at 4 °C for 24 h. No visible band of concentrated phages was observed, but the layer in which the T7 phages would have been expected was acquired and used for further purification. The CsCl was removed by dialysis with PBS using a 14,000 Da membrane filter. The titre of the purified phages was 1010 p.f.u. ml−1. Purified phages were stored at 4 °C.

To inactivate purified phages, a heat treatment was applied24. For this, purified phages in PBS were heated to 65 °C for 15 min, then cooled down to 37 °C before incubation with V. cholerae at 37 °C.

Quantifying phage susceptibility of biofilm populations

To test whether continuous phage exposure for 8 h in flow chambers resulted in a substantial fraction of phage-resistant cells in the biofilm population, strain KDV201 was exposed to Vibriophage N4 in flow chambers for 8 h. Bacterial cells were then collected from the flow chambers by mechanical scraping from the glass bottom surface and the PDMS top surface using a razor blade, followed by resuspension in fresh LB using vigorous vortexing and two washes with fresh LB medium. Despite the washes, some phages remained in the suspension or remained adsorbed to cells or remained inside cells. Cells from this collected population were co-incubated with or without fresh phages to test for their susceptibility to phage infection. Changes in bacterial culture density were monitored using a microplate reader (Spark 10 M, Tecan) under shaking conditions at 37 °C.

Crystal violet assay

To test the biofilm formation capability of bacteria that were exposed to phages for 8 h in flow chambers, a crystal violet assay was performed using a protocol described previously57. The specific protocol we used is as follows: Strain KDV201 was exposed to Vibriophage N4 in flow chambers for 8 h, at which point the cells were collected as described above, which resulted in a cell suspension that retained some phages. The collected cell population was streaked out on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. On the following day, isolated colonies were inoculated in 180 µl of fresh LB (in a 96-well plate). As controls, the V. cholerae WT (KDV201), ∆vpsL (KDV207) and vpvCW240R (rugose; KDV941) strains were also inoculated into individual wells of a 96-well plate from colonies on LB agar. These strains served as two negative controls and a positive control, respectively. For each strain, bacteria from a single colony were inoculated in triplicates into a 96-well plate. The microtitre plate was incubated at 37 °C with shaking (810 r.p.m.) inside a microplate reader until OD600 = 0.4. These cultures were then diluted 1:2,000 in 150 µl of fresh LB into another 96-well plate, which was incubated for biofilm growth at 25 °C for 14 h. After this incubation period, the culture was discarded and the wells washed to remove any unattached bacterial biomass. A 0.1% solution of crystal violet in water was used to stain the surface-attached bacterial biomass. After 15 min of incubation at room temperature, the crystal violet solution was discarded, and the wells were washed twice in clean water to remove any excess dye. The plates were left to dry upside down overnight at room temperature. On the following day, 30% acetic acid was added to each well to solubilize the crystal violet, and the optical density was measured at a wavelength of 550 nm (OD550) using a microplate reader. For each measurement, the data were averaged from three wells (technical replicates) per experiment, and n = 3 independent biological replicates were performed.

Colony rugosity assay

To test whether continuous phage exposure for 8 h in flow chambers resulted in a high frequency of mutants that produce a high amount of extracellular matrix (termed ‘matrix hyper-producers’ or strains with a ‘rugose’ colony morphology), cells were collected from the flow chambers after 8 h of phage exposure as described in the Methods section ‘Crystal violet assay’. The collected cells were streaked out on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The following day, isolated colonies were inoculated in 200 µl of fresh LB and spotted on LB agar plates, which were incubated at room temperature for 3 days. To retain humidity, the plates were sealed with parafilm. As controls, the V. cholerae WT (KDV201), ∆vpsL (KDV207) and vpvCW240R (rugose strain, KDV941) overnight cultures were also spotted on LB agar plates as two negative controls and a positive control, respectively. High matrix production (also known as rugosity) in V. cholerae manifests in the form of wrinkled and rough-looking bacterial colonies on LB agar58. Morphologies of colonies grown from the collected cells were visually compared with the smooth colonies of the WT and ∆vpsL strain and the wrinkled colonies of the rugose vpvCW240R strain.

Phage adsorption assay

To measure the Vibriophage N4 adsorption to V. cholerae WT or ∆trxA cells, the unabsorbed phages in the supernatant were enumerated by performing plaque assays at different times during phage infection. Cultures of strains KDV201 or KDV2464 were grown in LB at 37 °C until OD600 = 0.4 and exposed to purified phages at a MOI of 0.001. Bacteria and phages were co-incubated at 37 °C with shaking (250 r.p.m.). From this culture, 450 µl was sampled at 0, 4, 8 and 16 min after phages were added. Each sample was immediately centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 2 min. The supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes, which were placed on ice until all samples were collected. Phage-containing supernatants were serially diluted (up to 10−3) in PBS and their phage titres enumerated by a plaque assay. A decrease in the concentration of phages in the supernatant within the first few minutes after phage exposure indicates adsorption of phages to bacteria. For each experiment, plaque-forming unit measurements were averaged from three LB agar plates per bacterial strain (technical replicates), and a total of n = 3 biological replicates were performed.

EOP assay

To quantify the susceptibility of V. cholerae WT (strain KDV201) or ∆trxA (strain KDV2489) cells to Vibriophage N4 infection, a relative EOP assay was performed. Purified phages were serially diluted from 108 p.f.u. ml−1 to 104 p.f.u. ml−1 in LB. Of each phage dilution, 10 µl was spotted on bacterial lawns of strains KDV201 or KDV2489 that were grown on an LB agar plate. The plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight. On the following day, the number of plaque-forming units per millilitre were enumerated for each spotted phage inoculum. The EOP was calculated as the ratio of the plaque count and the number of virions in the given spotted phage inoculum. For each experiment, measurements were averaged from 5 phage spots per bacterial strain and phage dilution (technical replicates), and a total of n = 3 biological replicates were performed.

Preparation of sonicated bacterial lysates

Bacterial lysates were prepared from several Gram-negative species (V. cholerae strain KDV201, P. aeruginosa strain KDP43, E. coli strain KDE474) and Gram-positive species (B. subtilis strain KDB2, S. aureus strain KDM2). Bacterial cultures of all species were grown in LB medium, except for S. aureus, which was grown in TSB. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 250 r.p.m. Bacterial overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 in their respective fresh growth medium and grown at 37 °C with shaking until OD600 = 0.4. These cells were washed twice with equal volumes of fresh medium and then concentrated 100 times into fresh medium. Sonication was performed on ice using an ultrasonic probe (Heilscher UP200St) with settings of 50% capacity (0.5 s on and 0.5 s off), 80% amplitude, 1 min intervals with 1 min rest for 45 min. Cells were enumerated by plating on LB agar before and after sonication to determine the fraction of cells that were lysed. Lysates prepared with this protocol yielded ~99% lysis for all species. After sonication, the raw lysate was centrifuged (9,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C) and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (Roth) to remove intact bacterial cells. Bacterial lysates were stored at −80 °C.

To narrow down which part of the lysate contained the biofilm-inducing factor, sonicated lysates made from V. cholerae cells were treated one or more of the following enzymes: DNase I (Thermo Fisher, 18047019) at a final concentration of 1 U ml−1 incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, RNase A (Thermo Fisher, EN0531) at a final concentration of 1 µg ml−1 incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and proteinase K (Roth, 7528.1) at a final concentration of 20 µg ml−1 incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. Lysates treated with these enzymes were then flowed through microfluidic chambers that were inoculated with V. cholerae strain KDV428.

To roughly characterize the molecular weight of the biofilm-inducing factor, sonicated lysates made from V. cholerae cells were filtered through membrane filters of varying pore sizes (3 kDa, 10 kDa, 30 kDa, 100 kDa and 300 kDa, all from Merck Millipore). The filtrates were then flown into microfluidic chambers that were previously inoculated with V. cholerae strain KDV428.

Preparation of spheroplast lysate

Spheroplasts were prepared using a protocol described previously29. The specific protocol we used is as follows: Exponentially growing cells of V. cholerae C6706 (KDV201) grown in LB at 37 °C until OD600 = 0.4 were collected by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was washed with an equal volume of LB once, followed by two washes with 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0). Cells were then resuspended in spheroplasting buffer, using 1/5 of the initial volume (resulting in a 5× concentration). This buffer solution is composed of 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA and 20% (w/v) sucrose. Lysozyme (Sigma, 1052810010) was added to achieve a final concentration of 1 mg μl−1, and the cells were incubated at room temperature with gentle shaking for 3 h to generate spheroplasts, which was confirmed using microscopy. Spheroplasts were pelleted down by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min and resuspended in LB, using 1/100 of the initial volume (resulting in a 100× concentration). This suspension was immediately sonicated on ice to obtain spheroplast lysate, using the sonication settings described above.

Assays with PG

Purified B. subtilis PG was purchased from Sigma (69554-10MG-F) and suspended in fresh LB at a final concentration of 300 μg ml−1. Soluble PG was obtained by sonicating insoluble commercial PG, using the sonication settings described above for obtaining bacterial lysate. After sonication, undissolved PG was pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatant was used for the experiments.

To purify the cell wall from V. cholerae C6706 (KDV201) for Fig. 3c, the cell wall was isolated using a previously described protocol59. The specific protocol we used is as follows: V. cholerae cells from an overnight culture (OD600 = 4.0) were collected by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was washed with equal volume of LB once and then resuspended in PBS, using 1/10 of the initial volume. Resuspended cells were added drop-wise into 10 ml of boiling 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (in a water bath), while continuously stirring. This suspension was boiled for 2–3 h (water was replenished to prevent drying). Cell wall material was pelleted by ultracentrifugation (2.7 × 105 × g for 10 min at 20 °C). The pellet was washed with double-distilled H2O three times. Finally, the pellet was resuspended in LB using 1/10 of the initial volume. This suspension was immediately sonicated using the sonication settings described above to obtain a crude extract of PG fragments, which was used for the experiments only in Fig. 3c.

Protein expression and purification

The P. aeruginosa and V. cholerae genes encoding AmpDh3PA14, ShyAVc and MltAVc were cloned on pET28b(+) (Novagen) with C-terminal His-tags for expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. Bacteria were cultured in Terrific Broth (24 g l−1 yeast extract, 20 g l−1 tryptone, 4 ml l−1 glycerol, 0.017 M KH2PO4, 0.072 M K2HPO4), and expression was induced at OD600 0.4 with 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside and left overnight at 16 °C. Cell pellets were resuspended in PBS with a Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablet (Roche) and lysed by two passes through a French press at 68.9 MPa (10,000 p.s.i.) After centrifugation (30 min, 100,000 × g), proteins were purified from the cleared lysates via Ni-NTA agarose columns (Qiagen) and eluted with a discontinuous imidazole gradient using an ÄktaGo system. Purified fractions were loaded on a size exclusion chromatography Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column equilibrated with 100 mM citrate/citric acid buffer (pH 5) with 300 mM NaCl. Purified proteins were visualized by SDS–PAGE electrophoretic protein separation and quantified by Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). The proteins were either stored at 4 °C for immediate use or at −80 °C after the addition of 10% (v/v) glycerol.

In vitro production of PG digests

The lysozyme, amidase (AmpDh3PA14), d,d-endopeptidase (ShyAVc) and lytic transglycosylase (MltAVc) reactions were performed in 3 ml reactions using 50 µg ml−1 of purified enzymes with 300 μg ml−1 of sacculi isolated as described above from stationary phase cultures from V. cholerae (C6706). All digestions were carried out in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 4.9) overnight at 37 °C. Reactions were heat-inactivated (boiled for 5 min), and fractions were separated by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 15 min. The soluble fraction was used for the experiments, 10 µl of which was subjected to sample reduction to check correct digestion by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. First, pH was adjusted to 8.5–9 by the addition of borate buffer (0.5 M, pH 9) and then N-acetylmuramic acid residues were reduced to muramitol by sodium borohydride treatment (NaBH4 10 mg ml−1 final concentration) for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, pH was adjusted to 2.0–4.0 with orthophosphoric acid 25% (v/v) before analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Sample collection for RNA-seq

To collect a sufficient amount of biomass for RNA-seq, we inoculated V. cholerae C6706 (KDV201) cells in flow channels of six separate identical microfluidic chips, using the procedure described above. After exposure to PG (300 µg ml−1, sonicated) dissolved in LB or the control condition (LB without PG) for 10 min, the microfluidic device was disassembled, and a 1:1 mixture of PBS and RNAstop solution (a mixture of 95% (vol/vol) EtOH and 5% (vol/vol) phenol) was flowed across the glass surface to terminate transcription and translation. Subsequently, bacterial biomass was collected by scraping cells off of the glass surface using a clean razor blade, to obtain 1–2 ml of cell suspension, which was added to a 2 ml Eppendorf tube, and excess RNAstop solution (supernatant) was removed after centrifugation at 4 °C. Cells from each sample were resuspended in 50 μl of lysozyme buffer, which consisted of TE buffer (composed of 10 mM Tris (adjusted to pH 8.0 with HCl) and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) and 20 U μl−1 Ready-lyse lysozyme (Lucigen, R1804M). These suspensions were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation was performed. This sample collection procedure was performed on three separate days, to obtain a n = 3 biological replicates for each of the two conditions.

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using the hot SDS/hot phenol method60 with the following modifications. Cells were lysed at 65 °C for 2 min in the presence of 1% (w/v) SDS. Then, 6 μl of 1 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) and 62.5 μl of Roti-Aqua-Phenol (Roth, A980) were added to the lysate and incubated at 65 °C for 8 min. The whole mixture was transferred to a phase lock gel tube (VWR, 733-2478), followed by the addition of 62.5 μl of chloroform (Sigma, C2432). The mixture was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min at 12 °C. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube. RNA was purified from this solution using the Agencourt RNAClean XP Kit (Beckman Coulter, A63987). Samples were then treated with TURBO DNase (Thermo Fisher, AM2238) and quality checked using a TapeStation 4150 (Agilent, G2992AA). For ribosomal RNA depletion with the ‘do-it-yourself’ method61, 150–180 ng of total RNA was used. Library preparation for sequencing was carried out using NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep with Sample Purification Beads (NEB, E7765S). Sequencing was carried out at the Max Planck Genome Centre (Cologne, Germany) using an Illumina HiSeq3000 with 150 bp single reads, to obtain approximately 7 million reads per sample.

Transcriptome analysis

The sequencing read files were imported into the software CLC Genomics Workbench v10.1.1 (Qiagen) and mapped to the V. cholerae reference genome (National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers, NC_002505.1 and NC_002506.1) using the ‘RNA-Seq Analysis’ function in the CLC software with standard parameters. Reads mapping to annotated coding sequences were counted, normalized (transcript per million, TPM) and transformed (log2). Differential expression between the conditions was tested using the ‘Differential Expression for RNA-Seq’ command in the CLC software. Genes with a read count <10 in any condition were excluded from analysis. Genes with a fold change >2.0 and a false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted P < 0.05 were defined as differentially expressed. Candidate genes were categorized by keyword enrichment using information imported from UniProt62, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes63 and MicrobesOnline64.

Microscopy

Immediately after initiation of the flow of media through the microfluidic device, V. cholerae cells were imaged every 20 min or 30 min for up to 8 h. Imaging was performed with a Yokogawa CSU confocal spinning disk unit mounted on a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope using a ×60 oil objective with numerical aperture 1.4 (Nikon) for measurements of the biofilm biovolume fraction, or a ×100 silicon oil objective with numerical aperture 1.35 (Olympus) for measurements of spatiotemporal fluorescent reporters. Fluorescent proteins were excited with a 488 nm laser (sfGFP and mNeonGreen) or a 552 nm laser (mRuby2, mRuby3 and Tag-RFP-T). The microscope hardware was controlled by NIS Elements (Nikon) or by Micro-Manager 2.0beta. Images were captured by an Andor iXon EMCCD camera, cooled to −70 °C. Images were acquired at low excitation light intensities with 90 ms exposure time while amplifying the readout using the EM-gain of the camera. A Nikon PFS hardware autofocus was used to correct focus drift. Image stacks were acquired at a spatial resolution of 63.2 nm in the xy-plane and 0.5 µm in the z-direction.

Image analysis

All image analyses were performed with the software tool BiofilmQ v.1.0.115. For biofilm biovolume quantification, the cells were distinguished from the background based on the constitutively expressed fluorescent protein. Before segmentation, a mean filter with the kernel size 5 px (xy), 3 px (z) was applied to the images to reduce the photon shot noise. To reduce the segmentation artefacts introduced by free floating cells around the biofilm, the floating cell suppression algorithm of BiofilmQ was used. The cellular signal was enhanced above the background using a top-hat filter with a disk-shaped kernel larger than the expected bacterial size (here 5.5 µm or 25 px), which was applied per xy-image in the z-stack. The segmentation was performed on the resulting images by an Otsu threshold multiplied with 0.2 to make sure all fluorescent objects were captured correctly. The discount factor (0.2) was kept constant for all image segmentations. Subsequently, the total biovolume and the ratio of the biovolume above 3 µm from the substrate divided by the total biovolume were calculated.

For the spatiotemporal quantification of fluorescent reporters, the biofilm biovolume was segmented as described above, and the images were then further segmented into cubes with a side length of approximately 1 µm using BiofilmQ. For each cube, the mean fluorescence intensity or the ratio of the two measured fluorescent channels was calculated. In addition, the distance of each cube to the interface of the biofilm with the surrounding liquid was calculated, with a resolution of ~1 µm. To construct kymographs for the spatiotemporal analysis of fluorescent reporters, the parameter values of all cubes with a similar distance to the interface of the biofilm with the surrounding liquid were averaged, resulting in a value of a pixel in the space–time heat maps shown in Fig. 4c,d.

Statistical analysis and data presentation

Bar graphs were generated using Graphpad Prism v9, which was also used for performing all statistical tests indicated in figure captions. Three-dimensional rendering of confocal microscopy images of bacterial cells was performed using Paraview v.5.765, based on segmentation results and output from BiofilmQ15.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary (1.4MB, pdf)
Peer Review File (1.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 1 (15.2KB, xlsx)

Bacterial strains used in this study.

Supplementary Table 2 (11.1KB, xlsx)

Plasmids used in this study.

Supplementary Table 3 (10.7KB, xlsx)

DNA oligonucleotides used for plasmid construction in this study. Sequences are given in the 5′–3′ direction. Underlined nucleotides represent restriction enzyme sites.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 (16.8KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2 (19.6KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3 (23.3KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4 (42.4KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 5 (14.1KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 5.

Source Data Fig. 6 (10.9KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 6.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1 (85.3KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 1.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2 (17.6KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 2.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3 (28.2KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 3.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4 (30.8KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 4.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5 (17.1KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6 (12.6KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 6.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7 (10.7KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 7.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8 (14.5KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 8.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9 (9.7KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 9.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10 (19.9KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 10.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to M. Bayer, V. Potlog, S. Freier, K. Raveendran and L. Vidakovic for their help with strain construction; E. Jiménez Siebert for help with figure construction; F. Yildiz, K. Papenfort and M. Basler for important discussions; T. Glatter for proteomics analysis; H. Rohde for Staphylococcus strains; C. D. Nadell for advice at the early stage of the project; and P. Stallforth for advice regarding the signal identification. We are also grateful to L. Alvarez for generously providing us with the plasmid pET28-MltAVc. We thank the Max Planck Genome Centre for their sequencing service. This work in K.D.’s laboratory was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the European Research Council Starting Grant (716734), the Swiss National Science Foundation Consolidator Grant (TMCG-3_213801) and grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DR 982/5-1 and DR 982/6-1), Behrens-Weise-Stiftung, Minna-James-Heineman-Stiftung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (TARGET-Biofilms) and the National Center of Competence in Research AntiResist funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 51NF40_180541). In addition, this work was supported by grants to F.C. by The Swedish Research Council, The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, The Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Cancerfonden and The Kempe Foundation. The work by S.G. was supported by a grant from the Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete-Stiftung. Furthermore, this work was supported by fellowships from the International Max Planck Research School Marburg (to S.V., M.F.H., H.J.), the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (to K.N.), the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes (to H.J.) and the Joachim Herz Stiftung (to H.J.).

Extended data

Author contributions

S.V., P.K.S. and K.D. designed the project. S.V., D.S., D.K.H.R. and M.F.H. conducted experiments and data analysis. S.V., D.K.H.R., D.S. and M.F.H. generated strains. E.J. and H.J. wrote software for data analysis. K.N. prepared bacterial samples for RNA-seq. G.T. and F.C. performed digests of peptidoglycan and interpreted resulting data. S.G. provided wild isolate strains. S.V., D.S., D.K.H.R., P.K.S. and K.D. interpreted the data. K.D. supervised and coordinated the project. S.V. and K.D. wrote the paper with the help of all authors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks Jeffrey Withey and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

Transcriptome data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession number GSE216690. Raw image data are available via Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.14054836 (ref. 66). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Source code of the Matlab script used to quantify the 3D biofilm biovolume is available in a Github repository: https://github.com/knutdrescher/biofilm-3D-biovolume, and a demo dataset for this code is available via Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.13166027 (ref. 67).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Dibya Saha, Daniel K. H. Rode.

Extended data

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41564-024-01886-5.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41564-024-01886-5.

References

  • 1.Gottesman, S. Trouble is coming: signaling pathways that regulate general stress responses in bacteria. J. Biol. Chem.294, 11685–11700 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.LeRoux, M. et al. Kin cell lysis is a danger signal that activates antibacterial pathways of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Elife4, e05701 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bru, J. L. et al. PQS produced by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa stress response repels swarms away from bacteriophage and antibiotics. J. Bacteriol.201, e00383-19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tzipilevich, E., Pollak‐Fiyaksel, O., Shraiteh, B. & Ben‐Yehuda, S. Bacteria elicit a phage tolerance response subsequent to infection of their neighbors. EMBO J.41, e109247 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Faruque, S. M. et al. Self-limiting nature of seasonal cholera epidemics: role of host-mediated amplification of phage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102, 6119–6124 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seed, K. D. et al. Evidence of a dominant lineage of Vibrio cholerae-specific lytic bacteriophages shed by cholera patients over a 10-year period in Dhaka, Bangladesh. MBio2, e00334-10 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seed, K. D. et al. Evolutionary consequences of intra-patient phage predation on microbial populations. Elife3, 1–10 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Madi, N. et al. Phage predation, disease severity, and pathogen genetic diversity in cholera patients. Science384, eadj3166 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Beyhan, S. & Yildiz, F. H. Smooth to rugose phase variation in Vibrio cholerae can be mediated by a single nucleotide change that targets c-di-GMP signalling pathway. Mol. Microbiol.63, 995–1007 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vidakovic, L., Singh, P. K., Hartmann, R., Nadell, C. D. & Drescher, K. Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection. Nat. Microbiol.3, 26–31 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Diaz-Pascual, F. et al. Breakdown of Vibrio cholerae biofilm architecture induced by antibiotics disrupts community barrier function. Nat. Microbiol.4, 2136–2145 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eriksen, R. S., Svenningsen, S. L., Sneppen, K. & Mitarai, N. A growing microcolony can survive and support persistent propagation of virulent phages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 337–342 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Das, M. et al. Vibrio cholerae typing phage N4: genome sequence and its relatedness to T7 viral supergroup. Intervirology55, 185–193 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chattopadhyay, D. J. et al. New phage typing scheme for Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.31, 1579–1585 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hartmann, R. et al. Quantitative image analysis of microbial communities with BiofilmQ. Nat. Microbiol.6, 151–156 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lacqua, A., Wanner, O., Colangelo, T., Martinotti, M. G. & Landini, P. Emergence of biofilm-forming subpopulations upon exposure of Escherichia coli to environmental bacteriophages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72, 956–959 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brockhurst, M. A., Buckling, A. & Rainey, P. B. The effect of a bacteriophage on diversification of the opportunistic bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. R. Soc. B272, 1385–1391 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Castledine, M. et al. Parallel evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage resistance and virulence loss in response to phage treatment in vivo and in vitro. Elife11, e73679 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simmons, M., Drescher, K., Nadell, C. D. & Bucci, V. Phage mobility is a core determinant of phage-bacteria coexistence in biofilms. ISME J.12, 532–543 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heilmann, S., Sneppen, K. & Krishna, S. Coexistence of phage and bacteria on the boundary of self-organized refuges. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109, 12828–12833 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pires, D. P., Melo, L. D. R., Vilas Boas, D., Sillankorva, S. & Azeredo, J. Phage therapy as an alternative or complementary strategy to prevent and control biofilm-related infections. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.39, 48–56 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hansen, M. F. et al. Big impact of the tiny: bacteriophage–bacteria interactions in biofilms. Trends Microbiol.27, 739–752 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hammer, B. K. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol.50, 101–114 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vörös, Z., Csík, G., Herényi, L. & Kellermayer, M. Temperature-dependent nanomechanics and topography of bacteriophage T7. J. Virol.92, e01236-18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tabor, S., Huber, H. E. & Richardson, C. C. Escherichia coli thioredoxin confers processivity on the DNA polymerase activity of the gene 5 protein of bacteriophage T7. J. Biol. Chem.262, 16212–16223 (1987). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Qimron, U., Marintcheva, B., Tabor, S. & Richardson, C. C. Genomewide screens for Escherichia coli genes affecting growth of T7 bacteriophage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 19039–19044 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rice, S. A. et al. The biofilm life cycle and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are dependent on a filamentous prophage. ISME J.3, 271–282 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gödeke, J., Paul, K., Lassak, J. & Thormann, K. M. Phage-induced lysis enhances biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ISME J.5, 613–626 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jyot, J., Gautam, J. K., Raje, M. & Ghosh, A. Localization of DnaK and GroEL in Vibrio cholerae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.172, 165–171 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Irazoki, O., Hernandez, S. B. & Cava, F. Peptidoglycan muropeptides: release, perception, and functions as signaling molecules. Front. Microbiol.10, 429805 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fong, J. C. N., Syed, K. A., Klose, K. E. & Yildiz, F. H. Role of Vibrio polysaccharide (vps) genes in VPS production, biofilm formation and Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis. Microbiology156, 2757–2769 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Teschler, J. K., Nadell, C. D., Drescher, K. & Yildiz, F. H. Mechanisms underlying Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation and dispersion. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.76, 503–532 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dubnau, D. & Blokesch, M. Mechanisms of DNA uptake by naturally competent bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet.53, 217–237 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Conner, J. G., Zamorano-Sánchez, D., Park, J. H., Sondermann, H. & Yildiz, F. H. The ins and outs of cyclic di-GMP signaling in Vibrio cholerae. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.36, 20 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Massie, J. P. et al. Quantification of high-specificity cyclic diguanylate signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109, 12746–12751 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhou, H. et al. Characterization of a natural triple-tandem c-di-GMP riboswitch and application of the riboswitch-based dual-fluorescence reporter. Sci Rep.6, 20871 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Floyd, K. A. et al. c-di-GMP modulates type IV MSHA pilus retraction and surface attachment in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Commun.11, 1–16 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jenal, U., Reinders, A. & Lori, C. Cyclic di-GMP: second messenger extraordinaire. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.15, 271–284 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shah, I. M., Laaberki, M. H., Popham, D. L. & Dworkin, J. A eukaryotic-like Ser/Thr kinase signals bacteria to exit dormancy in response to peptidoglycan fragments. Cell135, 486–496 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dworkin, J. The medium is the message: interspecies and interkingdom signaling by peptidoglycan and related bacterial glycans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.68, 137–154 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kaplan, J. B. Antibiotic-induced biofilm formation. Int. J. Artif. Organs34, 737–751 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oliveira, N. M. et al. Biofilm formation as a response to ecological competition. PLoS Biol.13, e1002191 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cornforth, D. M. & Foster, K. R. Competition sensing: the social side of bacterial stress responses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.11, 285–293 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Korgaonkar, A. K. & Whiteley, M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa enhances production of an antimicrobial in response to N-acetylglucosamine and peptidoglycan. J. Bacteriol.193, 909–917 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Keestra-Gounder, A. M. & Tsolis, R. M. NOD1 and NOD2: beyond peptidoglycan sensing. Trends Immunol.38, 758–767 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Leroux, M., Peterson, S. B. & Mougous, J. D. Bacterial danger sensing. J. Mol. Biol.427, 3744–3753 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Westhoff, S., van Wezel, G. P. & Rozen, D. E. Distance-dependent danger responses in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.36, 95–101 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ting, S. Y. et al. Discovery of coordinately regulated pathways that provide innate protection against interbacterial antagonism. Elife11, e74658 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Prentice, J. A., van de Weerd, R. & Bridges, A. A. Cell-lysis sensing drives biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Commun.15, 1–10 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bhattacharyya, S., Walker, D. M. & Harshey, R. M. Dead cells release a ‘necrosignal’ that activates antibiotic survival pathways in bacterial swarms. Nat. Commun.11, 1–12 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989).
  • 52.Skorupski, K. & Taylor, R. K. Positive selection vectors for allelic exchange. Gene169, 47–52 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Andersen, J. B. et al. New unstable variants of green fluorescent protein for studies of transient gene expression in bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64, 2240–2246 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Singh, P. K. et al. Vibrio cholerae combines individual and collective sensing to trigger biofilm dispersal. Curr. Biol.27, 3359–3366.e7 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hartmann, R. et al. Emergence of three-dimensional order and structure in growing biofilms. Nat. Phys.15, 251–256 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yamamoto, K. R., Alberts, B. M., Benzinger, R., Lawhorne, L. & Treiber, G. Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification. Virology40, 734–744 (1970). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.O'Toole, G. A. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J. Vis. Exp.10.3791/2437 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yildiz, F. H. & Schoolnik, G. K. Role of rpoS in stress survival and virulence of Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol.180, 773–784 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dörr, T. et al. A novel peptidoglycan binding protein crucial for PBP1A-mediated cell wall biogenesis in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet.10, e1004433 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jahn, C. E., Charkowski, A. O. & Willis, D. K. Evaluation of isolation methods and RNA integrity for bacterial RNA quantitation. J. Microbiol. Methods75, 318–324 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Culviner, P. H., Guegler, C. K. & Laub, M. T. A simple, cost-effective, and robust method for rRNA depletion in RNA-sequencing studies. MBio11, e00010-20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.The UniProt Consortium UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res.49, D480–D489 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.28, 27–30 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dehal, P. S. et al. MicrobesOnline: an integrated portal for comparative and functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res.38, D396–D400 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ahrens, J., Geveci, B. & Law, C. 36 - ParaView: an end-user tool for large-data visualization. in Visualization Handbook (eds Hansen, C. D. & Johnson, C. R.) 717–731 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005); 10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1
  • 66.Vaidya, S., Saha, D., Rode, D. & Drescher, K. Source data for publication “Bacteria use exogenous peptidoglycan as a danger signal to trigger biofilm formation”. Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.14054836 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Saha, D., Jeckel, H. & Drescher, K. Demo dataset for code to quantify the 3D biofilm biovolume in images. Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.13166027 (2024).
  • 68.Yildiz, F. H. & Schoolnik, G. K. Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor: Identification of a gene cluster required for the rugose colony type, exopolysaccharide production, chlorine resistance, and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.96, 4028–4033 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhou, H. et al. Characterization of a natural triple-tandem c-di-GMP riboswitch and application of the riboswitch-based dual-fluorescence reporter. Sci. Rep.6, 20871 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Floyd, K. A. et al. c-di-GMP modulates type IV MSHA pilus retraction and surface attachment in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Commun.11, 1549 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zamorano-S nchez, D. Functional specialization in Vibrio cholerae diguanylate. MBio.10, e00670-19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lavigne, R., Sun, W. & Volckaert, G. PHIRE, a deterministic approach to reveal regulatory elements in bacteriophage genomes. Bioinformatics20, 629–635 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reporting Summary (1.4MB, pdf)
Peer Review File (1.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 1 (15.2KB, xlsx)

Bacterial strains used in this study.

Supplementary Table 2 (11.1KB, xlsx)

Plasmids used in this study.

Supplementary Table 3 (10.7KB, xlsx)

DNA oligonucleotides used for plasmid construction in this study. Sequences are given in the 5′–3′ direction. Underlined nucleotides represent restriction enzyme sites.

Source Data Fig. 1 (16.8KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2 (19.6KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3 (23.3KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4 (42.4KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 5 (14.1KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 5.

Source Data Fig. 6 (10.9KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Fig. 6.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1 (85.3KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 1.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2 (17.6KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 2.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3 (28.2KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 3.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4 (30.8KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 4.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5 (17.1KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6 (12.6KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 6.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7 (10.7KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 7.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8 (14.5KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 8.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9 (9.7KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 9.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10 (19.9KB, xlsx)

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 10.

Data Availability Statement

Transcriptome data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession number GSE216690. Raw image data are available via Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.14054836 (ref. 66). Source data are provided with this paper.

Source code of the Matlab script used to quantify the 3D biofilm biovolume is available in a Github repository: https://github.com/knutdrescher/biofilm-3D-biovolume, and a demo dataset for this code is available via Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.13166027 (ref. 67).


Articles from Nature Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES