Abstract
Compromising between accuracy and rapidity is an important issue in analytics and diagnostics, often preventing timely and appropriate reactions to disease. This issue is particularly critical for infectious diseases, where reliable and rapid diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and easier containment, thereby reducing economic and societal impacts. Diagnostic technologies are vital in disease modeling, tracking, treatment decision making, and epidemic containment. At the point-of-care level in modern healthcare, accurate diagnostics, especially those involving genetic-level analysis and nucleic acid amplification techniques, are still needed. However, implementing these techniques in remote or non-laboratory settings poses challenges because of the need for trained personnel and specialized equipment, as all nucleic acid-based diagnostic techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction and isothermal nucleic acid amplification, require temperature cycling or elevated and stabilized temperatures. However, in smart food packaging, there are approved and commercially available methods that use temperature regulation to enable autonomous heat generation without external sources, such as chemical heaters with phase change materials. These approaches could be applied in diagnostics, facilitating point-of-care, electricity-free molecular diagnostics, especially with nucleic acid-based detection methods such as isothermal nucleic acid amplification. In this review, we explore the potential interplay between self-heating elements, isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques, and phase change materials. This paves the way for the development of truly portable, electricity-free, point-of-care diagnostic tools, particularly advantageous for on-site detection in resource-limited remote settings and for home use.
Key Points
| Electricity-free nucleic acid-based detection can be achieved using self-heating elements adapted from smart food packaging technology. |
| The integration of self-heating elements and phase change materials with isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques offers a promising solution for developing portable electricity-free diagnostic devices at the point-of-care level, and in this review, examples of such devices for pathogen detection were examined. |
| Incorporating self-heating technologies, already approved for commercial use in food packaging, into diagnostic tools could revolutionize healthcare by enabling precise genetic-level diagnostics, which are particularly valuable during outbreaks and in resource-limited areas. |
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted the critical need for rapid and reliable diagnostic tools, particularly for the early detection of infectious diseases. The lack of prompt and accurate diagnostics in the early stages of the pandemic contributed to the rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus in 2019 [1]. Diagnostic accuracy is essential not only for treatment but also for controlling the transmission of diseases, a point emphasized by global health organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and the World Health Organization [2–4].
While nucleic acid amplification methods like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests remain the gold standard in detection because of their high sensitivity and specificity, they require specialized equipment and trained personnel [2, 5]. This makes PCR tests costly, time consuming and less accessible, particularly in resource-limited settings. Antigen tests, although faster and more convenient to use outside the laboratory, typically offer low sensitivity, due to factors such as mutations and individual immunity [6]. This gap in rapid, accurate, and accessible diagnostics underscores the need for point-of-care testing (POCT) solutions that can be effectively utilized outside traditional laboratory settings [7].
One of the primary challenges in developing portable nucleic acid-based POCT lies in the need for precise temperature control, especially in techniques such as PCR, which requires repeated thermocycling. Isothermal amplification methods, developed over the past two decades, offer a promising alternative by minimizing the need for complex temperature cycling, though they still require controlled (elevated) temperatures.
To overcome these challenges in non-laboratory settings, incorporating microheaters and microsensors, either independently or within microfluidic systems, presents a practical and effective approach. Microheaters generate heat through mechanisms such as Joule heating, ultrasonic heating, or radiative methods, are regulated by electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties, as well as its material composition and geometric design [8]. When integrated into microfluidic platforms, microheaters enable the development of portable diagnostic kits for on-site detection, thereby reducing dependence on external laboratory infrastructure [9]. Additionally, the integration of microsensors, particularly those utilizing electrical impedance analysis, significantly enhances diagnostic capabilities by enabling rapid and accurate nucleic acid detection. These microsensors, fabricated using microelectromechanical systems technology [9, 10]. However, despite their potential, microheaters and microsensors present certain drawbacks, including power consumption, uneven heat distribution, material limitations affecting long-term reliability, and high fabrication costs associated with microelectromechanical system technology, which can limit their accessibility [9].
In contrast, a promising and innovative solution is the integration of self-heating elements with phase change materials (PCMs) for temperature regulation. These technologies, already employed in smart food packaging, could be adapted for diagnostic applications, presenting a pathway to portable electricity-free diagnostic tools.
In this outlook review, we first explore the importance of POCT and nucleic acid-based amplification in diagnostics. We then provide an overview of self-heating elements used in smart food packaging. Finally, we discuss how self-heating elements from the food industry can integrate with nucleic acid amplification to create a portable device, point-of-care (POC) solution for prompt and accurate diagnosis.
Point-Of-Care Testing
Point-of-care testing refers to diagnostic testing conducted outside a central hospital laboratory, typically near the patient’s care site, such as at the bedside, in a physician’s office, or in the operating room [11–14]. Point-of-care testing enables immediate testing and analysis of patient samples, allowing for rapid diagnostic to assist caregivers in making timely treatment decisions [11, 13, 15]. Point-of-care testing can be deployed in various testing settings, including emergency departments, critical care units, outpatient clinics, and even non-traditional environments such as schools, workplaces, and mobile nursing practices [13]. The key advantages of POCT include increased accessibility to diagnosis, minimal sample volumes, and rapid analysis times, with the ideal goal of providing test results within minutes using simple protocols [15]. However, a single parameter POCT is often more expensive compared with the clinical laboratory diagnostics. The cost effectiveness of laboratory diagnostics continues to be the main hurdle for extensive use of POCT in many cases, especially in countries with well-developed laboratory infrastructures [16].
In addition to metabolites such as glucose, lactate, and a few other small molecules, POC diagnostics can be classified into two main groups: protein testing and nucleic acid testing [17, 18]. These two crucial pillars in diagnostic medicine offer distinct advantages and applications. Point-of-care protein testing, such as immunoassays characterized by its rapidity, cost effectiveness, and simplicity, has become indispensable tools [19–21]. For example, during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, rapid testing became a frequently used tool for controlling the pandemic, with at-home antigen tests widely available to the public, though less accurate compared with nucleic acid testing [2].
Microfluidic chips and paper-based devices are at the forefront of POC development [22–25]. While microfluidic chips offer high sensitivity and specificity, their requirement for additional equipment complicates their implementation. Conversely, paper-based assays, with their affordability and ease of use, hold significant promise for widespread adoption. Recent advancements in microfluidics and nanotechnologies have propelled the rapid evolution of paper-based POC assays, with commercially available products such as lateral flow immunoassays showcasing their potential in diagnostics [23, 26].
Analysis based on nucleic acids offers significant advantages for diagnosing various conditions, including infectious diseases, tumor biomarkers, and drug metabolism [27]. Point-of-care testing of nucleic acids enables direct pathogen detection without the need for culturing, providing speed and convenience [27, 28]. Consequently, research and development efforts are focused on microfluidic-based POCT platforms that integrate sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and detection within a single device, enabling rapid and sensitive detection of DNA and RNA targets [18, 29]. Despite challenges related to affordability and accessibility, ongoing advancements in nanotechnology hold promise for further enhancing nucleic acid POCT and expanding its clinical applications [28].
While POCT is becoming increasingly available in clinical settings, home-based POCT offers even more applications and convenience for customers to use in the comfort of their homes [30]. These at-home diagnostic tools enable individuals to monitor their health and make informed decisions about their care [13, 30]. For example, home pregnancy tests have become a widely accepted practice [31]. Similarly, glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus management has advanced significantly, allowing patients to manage their disease more effectively through regular self-testing with handheld glucose meters [30, 32, 33]. Beyond these, the range of available tests has expanded to include assessments for infections such as HIV and sexually transmitted diseases, and chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis [13, 31]. Technological advancements, such as telemedicine and telehealth, further enhance the effectiveness of home testing by enabling remote data transmission and allowing healthcare professionals to monitor patients’ health status from a distance [34]. The growing trend towards proactive healthcare management and personalized medicine is expected to continue expanding as technology advances and regulatory frameworks adapt, ultimately empowering individuals to take control of their health and well-being [13, 14].
Despite the growing potential of POC home testing diagnostics, several challenges persist. These tests must be designed for ease of use by individuals without laboratory training, with simple and intuitive procedures to ensure accurate results [35]. Additionally, the single-use nature of POC tests can be both inconvenient and costly compared with bulk testing in centralized laboratories [36]. Furthermore, POC test kits need to be resilient to environmental factors such as light, humidity, and temperature fluctuations, as poor storage conditions can compromise their accuracy [35].
Nucleic Acid Amplification in Diagnostics
Since the discovery of the DNA double helix structure in the 1950s [37], molecular diagnostics have evolved from a scientific tool into a routine part of medical care (Fig. 1). Among these advancements is Kary Mullis’ pioneering invention of the PCR in the 1980s [38, 39], which marked a significant shift in molecular diagnostics. Polymerase chain reaction revolutionized this field by lowering detection thresholds to trace amounts and even to single molecules, thanks to its ability to amplify DNA segments. Recognized for its exceptional sensitivity and selectivity, PCR became an instrumental tool in mutation exploration and the diagnosing of diverse pathologies [40]. This method involves cycles of heating and cooling DNA for repeated denaturation, primer annealing, and extension. The process begins with denaturation of the double stranded DNA at 93–95 °C. The annealing temperature is then determined by the melting temperature of the selected primers for the specific target. Finally, the primer extension step is carried out at 72 °C. By employing a thermostable DNA polymerase enzyme and specific primers, this method can achieve amplification exceeding a million-fold under an hour [38, 39, 41–45]. However, in order to achieve a successful amplification, specialized thermal cycling instruments are essential to this technique.
Fig. 1.
Milestones of molecular diagnosis techniques and self-heating elements. LAMP loop-mediated isothermal amplification, PCR polymerase chain reaction, RPA recombinase polymerase amplification
With the aim of amplifying nucleic acids without the need for thermal cycling, isothermal nucleic acid amplification (INAA) methods were developed [46–48]. isothermal nucleic acid amplification procedures operate at a single reaction temperature, using a special DNA polymerase with strong strand displacement activity and lacking 5′→3′ and 3′→5′ exonuclease activity, which significantly simplifies operational protocols [49]. The rise of INAA methods as viable alternatives to PCR began in the early 1990s, moving away from PCR’s reliance on sophisticated temperature cycling for denaturation, annealing, and extension [46, 47].
A range of INAA methods includes primer-generation rolling circle amplification [50, 51], recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) [52], helicase-dependent amplification [53], strand displacement amplification [46], loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [47], cross-priming amplification [54], exponential amplification reaction [55], whole genome amplification [56], and isothermal multiple-self-matching-initiated amplification [57]. Each method utilizes a different number of primers and enzymes, and some may require additional proteins, functioning at specific reaction temperatures ranging from physiological temperature up to 65 °C. In recent years, RPA and LAMP have been most prominently investigated for POCT applications, often combined with visual readout methods such as pH-dependent color change or lateral flow assays [58].
All INAA methods still require temperature control, especially at elevated temperatures: 37–42°C for RPA or 60–65°C for LAMP, for example. Therefore, a source of heating and temperature control must be provided at the point of need, and most proposed solutions involve electronic devices for heating and control. However, a truly independent POCT device should function without reliance on any instrument. The ideal POCT device is self-contained, which is where technological developments from other fields come into play.
Self-heating Elements in Smart Food Packaging
Beyond diagnostic developments, the food industry has begun designing self-contained systems for warming and cooling food and beverages in outdoor settings since the 1950s (Fig. 1). In fact, as early as the late 19th century, methods to heat and cool food and beverages without relying on external sources were already being investigated [59, 60]. A significant milestone in the development of self-heating packaging occurred in late 20th century with the introduction of flameless ration heaters, which utilize exothermic reaction processes [61]. Initially developed for and used by the US Army, flameless ration heaters are now available to consumers for heating “Meal, Ready-to-Eat” products [62, 63]. This method uses an exothermic reaction, typically water and calcium oxide (quicklime), to generate heat in a controlled and safe manner [62, 64]. Exothermic reactions are chemical processes that release energy, such as heat, into their surroundings. A common example is the hydration of quicklime (calcium oxide). When quicklime is combined with water, an exothermic reaction occurs, producing calcium hydroxide (a hydrate) and releasing thermal energy. This reaction causes the mixture to expand or “puff up.” The calcium hydroxide can be reconverted into quicklime by heating it to high temperatures, removing the water and reversing the hydration reaction. The amount of energy released during an exothermic reaction depends on the quantity of water involved and the nature of the reaction itself [65].
For example, a self-heating commercialized beverage from “the 42 Degrees Company” can increase its temperature by + 42 °C in just 3 min (Table 1). This rapid heating is achieved through the exothermic reaction between quicklime and water, which takes place in a compartment within the beverage can. The can is designed with two separate compartments: one contains water and calcium oxide, while the other holds the beverage. These compartments are completely isolated, ensuring that the chemical reaction never comes into direct contact with the drink. The process begins when the bottom of the can is pressed, breaking a seal that initiates the reaction by mixing water to calcium oxide. The heat generated is then safely transferred to the beverage, efficiently raising its temperature for convenient consumption.
Table 1.
Current applications of exothermic heat reactions in commercially available smart food packaging products on the market
| Exothermic reaction | Product | Companies using exothermic heat reactions |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium oxide (CaO) + H2O | Hot beverages, soups, and foods |
Aventura Self Heating (https://aventuradrinks.com/) The 42 Degrees Company (https://www.the42degreescompany.com/) HotCan (http://hotcan.com/) |
| Magnesium-based reaction (Mg-Fe) + H2O + salt | Hot beverages and meals |
HeaterMeals (https://heatermeals.com/) OMEALS (https://www.omeals.com/) (https://www.isellpackaging.com/) Henan Wordgen International Co. Ltd (https://xxwordgen.com/product-page/) |
| Aluminum powder (AI) + calcium oxide (CaO) + sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) + H2O | Heating food and drinks | http://www.powdermaterial.com/product/self-heating-package-for-food |
| Aluminum powder (AI) + calcium oxide (CaO) + H2O | Heating food and drinks | Henan Wordgen International co. ltd (https://xxwordgen.com/product-page/) |
| Aluminum and silica | Hot beverages | HeatGen (https://www.poweredbyheatgen.com/) |
The evolution of self-heating solutions reflects a pursuit of convenience, efficiency, and versatility in food packaging. Today’s sophisticated systems owe their development to technological breakthroughs, safety considerations, and consumer demand [66]. Table 1 showcases current commercially available smart food packaging products incorporating exothermic heat reactions, which utilize four specific chemical reactions.
Combining Self-heating Elements and Nucleic Acid Amplification for POC Diagnostics
Instrument-Free Nucleic Acid Amplification Devices Based on Exothermic Reactions with Water
In this section, diagnostic devices that successfully incorporated concepts and commercially available exothermic reactions from the food packaging industry are reviewed (Table 2, Fig. 3). In 2008, Weigl et al. proposed non-instrumented and/or minimally instrumented diagnostic devices that generate heat through a calcium oxide reaction and regulate temperature with a PCM, such as paraffin, making them suitable for INAA methods such as LAMP [67]. The first instrument-free device based on INAA and an exothermic reaction was the Non-instrumented Nucleic Acid Amplification (NINA) platform, developed by LaBarre et al. in 2009 [68, 69] (Fig. 3a). This platform aimed to provide a reliable test for diagnosing infectious diseases in a low-resource setting by utilizing the calcium oxide exothermic reaction. Once heat is generated by adding water to the exothermic reaction—using calcium oxide in this work—temperature stabilization in NINA devices is achieved by surrounding the amplification chamber with a layer of PCMs (Fig. 3a). These PCMs absorb the heat energy generated by the exothermic reaction and store it as latent heat for extended periods, effectively maintaining an isothermal temperature [70, 71].
Table 2.
Instrument-free, electricity-free, nucleic acid amplification devices based on exothermic reactions and water
| Sample format, pathogen | Detection time | Nucleic acid amplification method | Water-base exothermic reaction | Type of PCMs | Readout | Limit of detection/sensitivity | Publication year | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purified DNA of a bacteria (Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2) | ~ 60 min | LAMP | CaO | PureTemp 65a | Fluorescence | 137 genome copies | 2011 | [70] |
| Plasmodium falciparum genomic DNA | ~45 min | LAMP | CaO | Engineered phase change materials | Fluorescence | ~50 parasite genomes/μL | 2011 | [71] |
| Escherichia coli DNA | ~ 60 min | LAMP | Mg-Fe + NaCl in a microfluidic polymeric cartridge format | Paraffin frame | Fluorescence | 10 target molecules | 2011 | [82] |
| Purified RNA and DNA spiked into human plasma, HIV-1 | Not mentioned | RT-LAMP/LAMP | CaO | With PCM not mentioned which type of PCM | Fluorescence | For HIV-1 DNA: 10 copies per reaction/for HIV-1 RNA: 140 copies per reaction | 2012 | [74] |
| DNA isolated from a bacteria, Salmonella enterica-cell culture serial dilutions in 2% milk purified by SNAP card | ~ 3 h including sample preparation | LAMP | CaO | PureTemp 65 | Fluorescence | 1 CFU/mL | 2013 | [81] |
| HIV-1 DNA | 20–30 min | RPA | Sodium acetate trihydrate (SAT) | Without PCM | Immunochromatogra phic strip (ICS) | 10 copies | 2014 | [83] |
| Malaria Plasmodium genus | ~ 60 min | LAMP | Mg–Fe pouch format | With PCM not mentioned which type of PCM | Turbidity | The sensitivity is 96.8% (95% CI 83.2–99.5) | 2015 | [93] |
| Malaria P. falciparum parasites | The sensitivity is 100% (95% CI 75.1–100) | |||||||
| Saliva samples spiked with Zika virus | Less than 40 min | RT-LAMP | Mg-Fe Pouch format | PureTemp 68 | Naked-eye Colorimetric via microfluidic cassette | Sensitivity: 5 PFU | 2016 | [84] |
| Influenza A (H1N1) virus | 35 min | PCR | CaO | Water | Naked-eye lateral flow strip | 1.0 TCID50/mL | 2017 | [85] |
| Human papillomavirus DNA | ~ 70 min | LAMP | Mg-Fe alloy pouch format | PureTemp 68 | Colorimetric via microfluidic chip | 50 copies per test | 2019 | [73] |
| DNA extracted from T4 bacteriophage | ~10 min | RPA | Lithium | Without PCM | Fluorescent assay | Not mentioned | 2020 | [86] |
| DNA isolated from Cronobacter species bacteria | Less than 2 h and 30 min | LAMP | CaO | Three types of PCMs: suitable for maintaining temperatures at 35 °C, 65 °C, and 100 °C | Naked-eye Colorimetric Visual detection by hydroxynaphthol blue | 102 cfu/g | 2020 | [94] |
| saliva samples containing adenovirus DNA | More than an hour | LAMP | CaO + Al | Palmitic acid | Visual detection by color change | 2 copies/μL | 2023 | [95] |
| Escherichia coli DNA | 30 min | RPA | CaO + sodium carbonate | Without PCM | Lateral flow strip | 36.23 CFU/mL | 2024 | [87] |
CFU colony-forming unit, CI confidence interval, h hours, min minutes, PCM phase change material, PFU plaque-forming units, Ref reference, RPA recombinase polymerase amplification, RT-LAMP reverse transcriptase-loop-mediated isothermal amplification, TCID tissue culture infective dose, TCID50 the quantity of viruses required to cause cytopathic effect with half of cells in a cell culture plate
aWith a melting point of 65 °C
Fig. 3.
Schematics of different water-activated exothermic reaction instrument-free, electricity-free nucleic acid amplification devices. a The first version of the Non-instrumented Nucleic Acid Amplification (NINA) device [69]. b Self-heating non-instrumented cartridge for isothermal amplification of nucleic acids [82]. c An instrument-free device based on a capillary tube for convective polymerase chain reaction thermocycling, utilizing a calcium oxide mixture and lateral flow detection [85]. d Schematic of miniature lithium heaters with water [86]. PCM phase change material, POM Polyoxymethylene, SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate
In different versions of NINA devices, two types of exothermic reactions are used for heat generation: calcium oxide and magnesium-iron alloy [70–72]. The combination of exothermic reaction with PCMs for heat generation is a key development for the NINA devices. Phase change materials are compounds vital for managing thermal energy through storing energy as latent heat by inhibiting a phase transition [70, 71, 73]. They function optimally at specific melting temperatures, utilizing latent heat to maintain temperature stability within a defined range. Phase change materials find applications in diverse areas, such as energy management in buildings, solar energy storage, textiles, and smart food packaging [75–77]. Phase change materials, known for their adeptness in manipulating thermal energy during phase transitions, are particularly advantageous in handling the substantial heat generated during exothermic reactions [78, 79]. In the context of an exothermic reaction, the heat released initiates the melting process of the PCM, with the additional heat absorbed as latent heat of fusion within the PCM [80]. Once equilibrium is achieved, the stored latent heat sustains the two-phase PCM at the target temperature until the solid-to-liquid transition is completed and it solidifies entirely [75] (Fig. 2). The chosen PCM in NINA devices stands out for its adjustable characteristics, including the melting temperature range, specific heat capacity, and thermal conductivity, rendering the device a versatile incubation platform suitable for specific isothermal amplification techniques [71].
Fig. 2.

Thermal energy stored in phase change materials (PCMs). The graph illustrates the relationship between temperature (T) and thermal energy (Q) for a PCM, indicating the energy absorbed by the PCM during the phase change at constant temperature, providing insight into PCM heat storage dynamics
Since 2009, multiple iterations of the NINA platform have been successfully developed, with each version designed to detect a range of pathogens (Table 2) [70, 71, 74, 81]. In 2015, Diesburg et al. undertook a redesign of the NINA device with the aim of transforming it into a single-use disposable platform referred to as NINA-SUD. This new design approach involved re-engineering PCMs, by incorporating thermal enhancement additives and implementing a controlled introduction of reactants through porous media [72].
In addition to these NINA device versions, there are other devices for nucleic acid amplification techniques that utilize exothermic reactions with water as a heat source. These include the following devices.
In 2011, Liu et al. pioneered the development of a disposable, water-activated, self-heating, non-instrumented microfluidic cartridge for INAA and detection, powered by an exothermic chemical reaction (Fig. 3b). The reaction, driven by a magnesium-iron alloy and water, is controlled using filter paper to regulate the water flow from the reservoir to the reaction chamber. To maintain optimal temperatures for LAMP-based amplification, paraffin is employed as a PCM to stabilize the temperature in the amplification chambers. The effectiveness of the device was demonstrated by successfully amplifying and detecting Escherichia coli DNA, achieving detection sensitivity down to as few as ten target molecules in the sample [82].
In 2014, Lillis et al. introduced a heater system based on sodium acetate trihydrate (SAT) within a plastic cup, utilizing SAT as the exothermic reaction to generate heat. This system was employed for the first time with RPA as an isothermal amplification method for detecting HIV-1. Sodium acetate trihydrate releases heat through a crystallization process when activated, which occurs when the liquid form of sodium acetate is seeded with powdered SAT, triggering its transition to a solid state [83]. In 2016, Song et al. developed an instrument-free POC molecular diagnostic system for detecting Zika virus in saliva samples. The system consists of two key components: a disposable microfluidic cassette and a chemically heated cup. The microfluidic cassette features four independent multi-functional amplification reactors. The diagnostic process begins with the collection of saliva in a tube, followed by lysis with a buffer solution. The lysed sample is then filtered through an isolation membrane within the cassette, where nucleic acid extraction occurs. Nucleic acids bind to the silica membrane in the reactors, eliminating the need for an elution step and streamlining the workflow. Isothermal amplification, reverse transcriptase-LAMP, takes place directly on the membrane, powered by Mg-Fe pouch format with PCMs. Results are visually detected using a leuco crystal violet dye, which turns violet in the presence of double-stranded DNA. This system can detect less than 5 plaque-forming units of Zika virus per sample in under 40 min [84].
Qiu et al. in 2017, demonstrated that PCR could also be used in POCT devices by employing convective temperature gradients. They developed a rapid molecular detection platform for the H1N1 virus, achieving results within 35 min (Fig. 3c). This method combines a convective polymerase chain reaction with a dipstick assay. A fully disposable, calcium oxide-heated thermal processor heats the capillary tube from the bottom at a fixed temperature, eliminating the need for electrical power. Amplification occurs spontaneously as reagents move through different temperature zones, reducing amplification time by eliminating the need for controlled temperature cycling. Heating the capillary tube to around 95 °C from the bottom initiates amplification, with reagents experiencing different temperature zones associated with DNA denaturation, annealing, and extension stages. Detection of amplification products is done by a rapid one-step nucleic acid dipstick assay, enabling visual detection without instrumentation [85].
In 2020, Udugama et al. developed a tunable and precise miniature lithium heater (Fig. 3f) [86]. The device presented three key features: (1) its adaptable temperature modulation capability overcomes the limitations of conventional chemical heaters, allowing diverse enzyme sets to be used without inhibition; (2) it achieves target temperatures within 1 min, reducing assay times; and (3) its compact size enables portability for complex biological procedures in electricity-free environments. The design of this heater involved utilizing chemical reactions and bubble flow to extract energy from reactive alkali metals, particularly lithium, chosen for its high energy density (~ 222 kJ/mol), ease of handling, and reactivity with water. The shaping and control of lithium’s surface area enabled the creation of a reliable heating by compressing lithium into a channel where it reacts with water to produce heat. These miniature heaters were demonstrated with T4 bacteriophage DNA amplification with RPA at 42 °C, and fluorescence detection of the amplified DNA using a smartphone device. [86]
In 2024, Feng et al. developed a self-heating, RPA-based, integrated lateral flow (LF) strip biosensor consisting of five main components: the LF strip device, connector, RPA reaction chamber, support device, and heating device. Each of these components can function independently or be combined to form a complete system. The LF strip is housed within the LF strip device, while the heating device contains a self-heating mechanism primarily made of calcium oxide, wrapped in non-woven fabric. When exposed to water via pipetting, the self-heating mechanism generates a controlled amount of heat, creating the necessary external temperature environment for the RPA reaction chamber to function effectively [87].
In Table 2, we present an overview of instrument and electricity-free nucleic acid amplification devices that employ water-based exothermic reactions chronically. These devices utilize different types of water-based exothermic reactions involving various compound, such as calcium oxide, magnesium-iron alloy, calcium oxide with sodium carbonate, calcium oxide with aluminum, lithium, and sodium acetate trihydrate.
For the readout of the summarized example devices, various methods have been utilized, including fluorescence, paper-based methods, and colorimetric assays using microfluidic chips. Additionally, among the isothermal amplification techniques integrated into instrument-free, electricity-free nucleic acid amplification devices, two types have been preferred: loop-mediated isothermal amplification and recombinase polymerase amplification. Recombinase polymerase amplification performs isothermal amplification at a low temperature range (39–42 °C), while loop-mediated isothermal amplification operates at a higher temperature range of 60–65 °C [88, 89].
Non-water-Based Self-heating Systems
In addition to water-activated exothermic reactions, other materials have been developed to enable heat generation autonomously without the need for water. These methods include the use of disposable pocket warmers, sunlight, and air-activated hand warmers (Table 3) [90–92]
Table 3.
Non-water-based, self-heating, instrument-free, electricity-free nucleic acid amplification systems
| Sample format, pathogen | Detection time, min | Isothermal method | Self-heating element | Type of PCMs | Readout | Limit of detection/sensitivity | Publication year | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA extracted from Bacillus anthracis | 90 | LAMP | Disposable pocket warmer | Without PCM | Fluorescence and naked eye | 1000 copies of Bacillus anthracis pag and capB gene fragments per tube | 2010 | [90] |
| Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus DNA | ~ 60 | LAMP | Sunlight | PureTemp 68 |
Optical sensors Light-emitting diodes |
19 copies per reaction | 2018 | [91] |
| RNA extracted from SARS-CoV-2 | 17, 84, and 90 | RT-RPA | Hand warmer pouch | Without PCM | Naked-eye detection by lateral flow strip | 94.1% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95.8%, accuracy of the microfluidic system | 2021 | [92] |
LAMP loop-mediated isothermal amplification, min minutes, PCM phase change material, Ref reference, RPA recombinase polymerase amplification, SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
In 2010, Hatano et al. employed LAMP for anthrax detection as an example for anti-bioterrorism POCT application. They used a disposable pocket warmer to heat the LAMP reaction, achieving a stable temperature of approximately 60 °C for DNA amplification over about 90 min. Then, amplified DNA could be detected using ambient light [90].
In 2018, Snodgrass et al. introduced the “Tiny Isothermal Nucleic acid quantification sYstem” (TINY), which utilizes a PCM, PureTemp 68, to store heat isothermally and perform LAMP. The authors claimed that its versatility in heat sources, including sunlight and electricity, makes it suitable for both laboratory and field use. They demonstrated this device with the detection of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus DNA using a fluorescent dye. In this example, users align the lens with the sun by rotating it within a supporting structure, and lens readjustment was necessary one to three times when heating TINY with sunlight, varying based on geographic position and time of year. Afterward, the latent heat from the melted PCM inside TINY maintained the system at an isothermal state for over an hour [91]. Additionally, in 2021, Li et al. employed a hand warmer containing iron powder, salt, and activated carbon, which is activated by exposure to oxygen in the air. They integrated this with a microfluidic chip for detecting viral severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 based on CRISPR-RT-RPA with naked-eye detection using a lateral flow strip readout [92].
Discussion and Outlook
Ongoing progress in nucleic acid amplification techniques, particularly INAA methods, presents a promising future for diagnostics that do not require thermocycling equipment. INAAs offer distinct advantages over PCR for POC applications, including the ease of maintaining a single temperature and faster processing times. The integration of self-heating elements into diagnostic tools, inspired by innovations in smart food packaging, marks a significant leap forward in technological advancement, as discussed through the examples in this review. Expanding these self-heating technologies beyond their traditional use into the realm of molecular diagnostics could revolutionize personalized healthcare.
The integration of exothermic reactions with PCMs in portable diagnostic tools, such as NINA devices, holds significant potential to improve diagnostic accessibility, particularly in resource-limited settings. By reducing turnaround times and enabling efficient, portable diagnostics, these innovations could lead to the development of fully integrated ‘sample-to-result’ platforms that can be operated by minimally trained personnel, thereby greatly enhancing healthcare efficiency and accessibility. Furthermore, the incorporation of self-heating elements in diagnostic systems could facilitate the development of electricity-independent platforms for on-site detection and at home use, offering a profound impact on global health security, particularly in response to the increasing threat of emerging infectious diseases. Future directions involve the commercialization of these electricity-free, nucleic acid-based devices, similar to the self-heating food and beverage products available to consumers. This approach not only facilitates the rapid and accurate identification of active infections but also holds great promise for the development of multiplexed assays, allowing for the simultaneous detection of multiple disease types.
However, commercializing these self-heating diagnostic tools poses significant challenges. Regulatory hurdles remain a critical concern, as these devices must meet stringent safety and efficacy standards before gaining approval for medical use. While self-heating components in food packaging have already been approved for commercial use, transitioning these technologies into medical applications will require additional regulatory scrutiny. Moreover, cost considerations will be a factor in determining the widespread adoption of these devices, as manufacturers must balance affordability with the sophisticated technology involved. Market acceptance will depend on demonstrating the reliability, safety, and value of these diagnostics to both healthcare professionals and consumers.
The SWOT analysis of self-heating elements in the smart food technology market highlights several key factors. The strengths of this technology include its significant convenience and portability, making it well suited for on-the-go lifestyles, outdoor activities, and emergency situations. Its ability to deliver consistent sufficient heating without the need for external appliances distinguishes it in a competitive market. However, high development costs and stringent regulatory requirements may limit growth and adoption. Opportunities for expansion are driven by ongoing technological advancements and the increasing demand for convenience. Progress in chemical and material sciences presents possibilities for enhancing safety, sustainability, and cost efficiency, positioning this technology for future growth. Nonetheless, the market also faces threats, such as intense competition from established players and a reliance on continued technological innovation. Successfully navigating these challenges will require balancing innovation, safety, sustainability, and cost effectiveness to capitalize on opportunities and address the inherent risks.
Nevertheless, the applications of these electricity-free and instrument-free diagnostic devices are endless and not limited only to regular pathogen monitoring in clinics, hospitals, pharmacies, and even homes. During outbreaks, these devices could play a crucial role in quickly and accurately detecting pathogens, helping to prevent the spread of disease. In industries such as food production, this approach could be used to monitor pathogens such as Salmonella, Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium avium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and many others in drinking water, addressing severe health risks. Additionally, in environmental monitoring, these tools could facilitate on-site pathogen detection without the need for sample transport, enabling immediate action. As these technologies evolve, their potential extends even further, including the detection of bioterrorism threats and ensuring public safety. By addressing the challenges of cost, regulation, and market acceptance, self-heating diagnostic tools have the opportunity to revolutionize POC diagnostics, particularly in resource-limited and remote settings. With continued innovation and exploration of new applications, these devices can meet the ASSURED criteria set by the World Health Organization, ensuring that diagnostics are affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid, robust, equipment-free, and deliverable to end users.
Acknowledgments
Mojdeh Hamidizadeh would like to thank the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes (German National Academic Foundation) for its support.
Declarations
Funding
Open access funding was enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Conflicts of Interest
Mojdeh Hamidizadeh, Renata F. Martins, and Frank F. Bier have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Availability of Data and Material
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Authors’ Contributions
MH: idea, writing, review, and editing; RFM and FFB: review and editing.
References
- 1.Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang Y. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle. J Med Virol. 2020;92(4):401–2. 10.1002/jmv.25678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization. Recommendations for national SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies and diagnostic capacities. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-lab-testing-2021.1-eng. Accessed 4 Jan 2024.
- 3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Rapid risk assessment: outbreak of acute respiratory syndrome associated with a novel coronavirus, Wuhan, China; first update. Stockholm: ECDC.
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). COVID-19 testing. Accessed 07 Nov 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/clinical-care/overview-testing-sars-cov-2.html.
- 5.World Health Organization. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/antigen-detection-in-the-diagnosis-of-sars-cov-2infection-using-rapid-immunoassays. Accessed 4 Jan 2024.
- 6.Høeg TB, Prasad V. Rapid antigen testing for COVID-19: Decreasing diagnostic reliability, potential detrimental effects and a lack of evidence to support continued public funding of community-based testing. Public Health Pract. 2023;6: 100451. 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang S, Rothman RE. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(6):337–48. 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01044-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kulkarni MB, Yashas, Vyas R. A role of integrated microheaters in a microfluidics based point-of-care-testing and beyond for healthcare applications. Appl Mater Today. 2024;38:102225. 10.1016/j.apmt.2024.102225. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jeroish ZE, Bhuvaneshwari KS, Samsuri F, Narayanamurthy V. Microheater: material, design, fabrication, temperature control, and applications:a role in COVID-19. Biomed Microdevices. 2022;24(1):3. 10.1007/s10544-021-00595-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Z, et al. Minute level ultra-rapid and thousand copies level high-sensitive pathogen nucleic acid identification based on contactless impedance detection microsensor. Talanta. 2024;278: 126487. 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Santrach PJ, Burritt MF. Point-of-care testing. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70(5):493–4. 10.4065/70.5.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kost GJ, et al. The laboratory-clinical interface. Chest. 1999;115(4):1140–54. 10.1378/chest.115.4.1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.von Lode P. Point-of-care immunotesting: approaching the analytical performance of central laboratory methods. Clin Biochem. 2005;38(7):591–606. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gubala V, Harris LF, Ricco AJ, Tan MX, Williams DE. Point of care diagnostics: status and future. Anal Chem. 2012;84(2):487–515. 10.1021/ac2030199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vashist SK, Luppa PB, Yeo LY, Ozcan A, Luong JHT. Emerging technologies for next-generation point-of-care testing. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(11):692–705. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Junker R, Schlebusch H, Luppa PB. Point-of-care testing in hospitals and primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(33):561–7. 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Warsinke A. Point-of-care testing of proteins. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;393(5):1393–405. 10.1007/s00216-008-2572-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Niemz A, Ferguson TM, Boyle DS. Point-of-care nucleic acid testing for infectious diseases. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29(5):240–50. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang S, Lifson MA, Inci F, Liang L-G, Sheng Y-F, Demirci U. Advances in addressing technical challenges of point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited settings. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(4):449–59. 10.1586/14737159.2016.1142877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dincer C, Bruch R, Kling A, Dittrich PS, Urban GA. Multiplexed point-of-care testing: xPOCT. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35(8):728–42. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Drain PK, et al. Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(3):239–49. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70250-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu J, He Z, Chen Q, Lin J-M. Biochemical analysis on microfluidic chips. Trends Anal Chem. 2016;80:213–31. 10.1016/j.trac.2016.03.013. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gong Y, et al. Improved LFIAs for highly sensitive detection of BNP at point-of-care. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:4455–66. 10.2147/IJN.S135735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhu G, Yin X, Jin D, Zhang B, Gu Y, An Y. Paper-based immunosensors: current trends in the types and applied detection techniques. Trends Anal Chem. 2019;111:100–17. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.09.027. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hu J, et al. Advances in paper-based point-of-care diagnostics. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;54:585–97. 10.1016/j.bios.2013.10.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li F, et al. Paper-based point-of-care immunoassays: recent advances and emerging trends. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;39: 107442. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang L, Ding B, Chen Q, Feng Q, Lin L, Sun J. Point-of-care-testing of nucleic acids by microfluidics. Trends Anal Chem. 2017;94:106–16. 10.1016/j.trac.2017.07.013. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hartman MR, et al. Point-of-care nucleic acid detection using nanotechnology. Nanoscale. 2013;5(21):10141. 10.1039/c3nr04015a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vashist SK. Lab-on-a-chip-based point-of-care immunoassays. In: Point-of-care technologies enabling next-generation healthcare monitoring and management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 157–75. 10.1007/978-3-030-11416-9_6. [Google Scholar]
- 30.St-Louis P. Status of point-of-care testing: promise, realities, and possibilities. Clin Biochem. 2000;33(6):427–40. 10.1016/S0009-9120(00)00138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kozel TR, Burnham-Marusich AR. Point-of-care testing for infectious diseases: past, present, and future. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(8):2313–20. 10.1128/JCM.00476-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Buhling KJ, et al. Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy. Clin Biochem. 2003;36(5):333–7. 10.1016/S0009-9120(03)00054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.O’Malley EG, Reynolds CME, O’Kelly R, Killalea A, Sheehan SR, Turner MJ. A prospective evaluation of point-of-care measurements of maternal glucose for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2020;66(2):316–23. 10.1093/clinchem/hvz005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ruano-López JM, et al. The SmartBioPhone™, a point of care vision under development through two European projects: OPTOLABCARD and LABONFOIL. Lab Chip. 2009;9(11):1495. 10.1039/b902354m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khan AR, Hussain WL, Shum HC, Hassan SU. Point-of-care testing: a critical analysis of the market and future trends. Frontiers Lab Chip Technol. 2024. 10.3389/frlct.2024.1394752. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wiencek J, Nichols J. Issues in the practical implementation of POCT: overcoming challenges. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(4):415–22. 10.1586/14737159.2016.1141678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Watson JD, Crick FHC. The structure of DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1953;18:123–31. 10.1101/SQB.1953.018.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mullis KB, Faloona FA. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:335–50. 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mullis KB. The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction. Sci Am. 1990;262(4):56–65. 10.1038/scientificamerican0490-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moore P. Replicating success. Nature. 2005;435(7039):235. 10.1038/435235a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Desforges JF, Eisenstein BI. The polymerase chain reaction. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(3):178–83. 10.1056/NEJM199001183220307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Compton J. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Nature. 1991;350(6313):91–2. 10.1038/350091a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Abramowitz S. Towards inexpensive DNA diagnostics. Trends Biotechnol. 1996;14(10):397–401. 10.1016/0167-7799(96)10051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Saiki RK, et al. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science (1979). 1988;239(4839):487–91. 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sathyanarayana SH, Wainman LM. Laboratory approaches in molecular pathology: the polymerase chain reaction. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2024. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822824-1.00041-9. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Walker GT, Fraiser MS, Schram JL, Little MC, Nadeau JG, Malinowski DP. Strand displacement amplification: an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(7):1691–6. 10.1093/nar/20.7.1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Notomi T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(12):E63. 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhao Y, Chen F, Li Q, Wang L, Fan C. Isothermal amplification of nucleic acids. Chem Rev. 2015;115(22):12491–545. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ignatov KB, Barsova EV, Fradkov AF, Blagodatskikh KA, Kramarova TV, Kramarov VM. A strong strand displacement activity of thermostable DNA polymerase markedly improves the results of DNA amplification. Biotechniques. 2014;57(2):81–7. 10.2144/000114198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lizardi PM, Huang X, Zhu Z, Bray-Ward P, Thomas DC, Ward DC. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet. 1998;19(3):225–32. 10.1038/898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dahl F, Banér J, Gullberg M, Mendel-Hartvig M, Landegren U, Nilsson M. Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(13):4548–53. 10.1073/pnas.0400834101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Piepenburg O, Williams CH, Stemple DL, Armes NA. DNA detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(7): e204. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vincent M, Xu Y, Kong H. Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(8):795–800. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fang R, et al. Cross-priming amplification for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(3):845–7. 10.1128/JCM.01528-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Van Ness J, Van Ness LK, Galas DJ. Isothermal reactions for the amplification of oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(8):4504–9. 10.1073/pnas.0730811100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang L, Cui X, Schmitt K, Hubert R, Navidi W, Arnheim N. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89(13):5847–51. 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ding X, et al. Improved detection limit in rapid detection of human enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 by a novel reverse transcription-isothermal multiple-self-matching-initiated amplification assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(6):1862–70. 10.1128/JCM.03298-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Milenia Biotec GmbH. Recombinase polymerase amplification and lateral flow. Accessed 07 Nov 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.milenia-biotec.com/en/method/recombinase-polymerase-amplification/.
- 59.Ho SH, Rahman MM, Sunol AK. Analysis of thermal response of a food self-heating system. Appl Therm Eng. 2010;30(14–15):2109–15. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.05.020. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Caldwell WA, Gillies J. Development of self-heating food can. Industrial Chemist. 1950;26(306):301–4. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Brody AL, Bugusu B, Han JH, Sand CK, McHugh TH. Scientific status summary. J Food Sci. 2008. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Oliver-Hoyo MT, Pinto G, Llorens-Molina JA. The chemistry of self-heating food products: an activity for classroom engagement. J Chem Educ. 2009;86(11):1277. 10.1021/ed086p1277. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Oleksyk LE, Pickard D, Trottier R. Development of the flameless ration heater for the meal, ready-to-eat. 1993.
- 64.Bell WL, Copeland RJ, Schultz AL. Application of new chemical heat sources, phase I. US Army and Biological Chemical Command, Publishers, TR-01/004, 2001.
- 65.Nanda SS, Singh JP, Gautam S, Yi DK. Calcium-based materials. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2024. 10.1201/9781003360599. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yousefi H, Su H-M, Imani SM, Alkhaldi K, Filipe CDM, Didar TF. Intelligent food packaging: a review of smart sensing technologies for monitoring food quality. ACS Sens. 2019;4(4):808–21. 10.1021/acssensors.9b00440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Weigl B, Domingo G, LaBarre P, Gerlach J. Towards non- and minimally instrumented, microfluidics-based diagnostic devices. Lab Chip. 2008;8(12):1999–2014. 10.1039/b811314a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.LaBarre P, Wilmoth J, Beddoe A, Singleton J, Gerlach J, Weigl BH. LAMP without electric heat: a chemically heated, non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification assay platform for point-of-care use. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual AACC Oak Ridge Conference. Washington, DC: American Association for Clinical Chemistry; 2009.
- 69.LaBarre P, Gerlach J, Wilmoth J, Beddoe A, Singleton J, Weigl B. Non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification (NINA): instrument-free molecular malaria diagnostics for low-resource settings. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, August 2010. pp. 1097–9. 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627346. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 70.Kubota R, LaBarre P, Singleton J, Beddoe A, Weigl BH. Non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification (NINA) for rapid detection of Ralstonia solanacearum Race 3 Biovar 2. Biol Eng Trans. 2011;4(2):69–80. 10.13031/2013.38508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.LaBarre P, et al. A simple, inexpensive device for nucleic acid amplification without electricity: toward instrument-free molecular diagnostics in low-resource settings. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5): e19738. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Diesburg SP, Guelig D, Burton R, Singleton J, LaBarre P. Development of a single-use, disposable, electricity-free, nucleic acid amplification platform. In: 2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), October 2015. pp. 400–6. 10.1109/GHTC.2015.7344003.
- 73.Yin K, et al. Synergistically enhanced colorimetric molecular detection using smart cup: a case for instrument-free HPV-associated cancer screening. Theranostics. 2019;9(9):2637–45. 10.7150/thno.32224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Curtis KA, et al. Isothermal amplification using a chemical heating device for point-of-care detection of HIV-1. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2): e31432. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mondal S. Phase change materials for smart textiles: an overview. Appl Therm Eng. 2008;28(11–12):1536–50. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.08.009. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tao X, editor. Smart fibres, fabrics and clothing: fundamentals and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Parhizi M, Jain A. The impact of thermal properties on performance of phase change based energy storage systems. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;162: 114154. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114154. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hossain MDT, Shahid MDA, Ali MDY, Saha S, Jamal MSI, Habib A. Fabrications, classifications, and environmental impact of PCM-incorporated textiles: current state and future outlook. ACS Omega. 2003;8(48):45164–76. 10.1021/acsomega.3c05702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Farid MM, Khudhair AM, Razack SAK, Al-Hallaj S. A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy Convers Manag. 2004;45(9–10):1597–615. 10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.015. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Günther E, Hiebler S, Mehling H, Redlich R. Enthalpy of phase change materials as a function of temperature: required accuracy and suitable measurement methods. Int J Thermophys. 2009;30(4):1257–69. 10.1007/s10765-009-0641-z. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kubota R, Labarre P, Weigl BH, Li Y, Haydock P, Jenkins DM. Molecular diagnostics in a teacup: non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification (NINA) for rapid, low cost detection of Salmonella enterica. Chin Sci Bull. 2013;58(10):1162–8. 10.1007/s11434-012-5634-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Liu C, Mauk MG, Hart R, Qiu X, Bau HH. A self-heating cartridge for molecular diagnostics. Lab Chip. 2011;11(16):2686. 10.1039/c1lc20345b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lillis L, et al. Non-instrumented incubation of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the rapid and sensitive detection of proviral HIV-1 DNA. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e108189. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Song J, Mauk MG, Hackett BA, Cherry S, Bau HH, Liu C. Instrument-free point-of-care molecular detection of Zika virus. Anal Chem. 2016;88(14):7289–94. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Qiu X, et al. Instrument-free point-of-care molecular diagnosis of H1N1 based on microfluidic convective PCR. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;243:738–44. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.058. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Udugama B, Kadhiresan P, Chan WCW. Tunable and precise miniature lithium heater for point-of-care applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(9):4632–41. 10.1073/pnas.1916562117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Feng F, et al. An integrated self-heating recombinase polymerase amplification lateral flow strip biosensor for quantification of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Microchem J. 2024;199: 109979. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.109979. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Notomi T, Mori Y, Tomita N, Kanda H. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. J Microbiol. 2015;53(1):1–5. 10.1007/s12275-015-4656-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Daher RK, Stewart G, Boissinot M, Bergeron MG. Recombinase polymerase amplification for diagnostic applications. Clin Chem. 2016;62(7):947–58. 10.1373/clinchem.2015.245829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hatano B, et al. LAMP using a disposable pocket warmer for anthrax detection, a highly mobile and reliable method for anti-bioterrorism. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010;63(1):63.36. 10.7883/yoken.63.36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Snodgrass R, et al. A portable device for nucleic acid quantification powered by sunlight, a flame or electricity. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(9):657–65. 10.1038/s41551-018-0286-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Li Z, Ding X, Yin K, Avery L, Ballesteros E, Liu C. Instrument-free, CRISPR-based diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2 using self-contained microfluidic system. Biosens Bioelectron. 2022;199: 113865. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sema M, et al. Evaluation of non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (NINA-LAMP) for the diagnosis of malaria in Northwest Ethiopia. Malar J. 2015;14(1):44. 10.1186/s12936-015-0559-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Fu S, et al. Electricity-free amplification and visual detection of Cronobacter species in powdered infant formula. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(8):6882–93. 10.3168/jds.2019-17661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kimura Y, Ikeuchi M. Development of non-electrically controlled SalivaDirect LAMP (NEC-SD-LAMP), a new nonelectrical infectious disease testing method. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):11791. 10.1038/s41598-023-38800-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


