Abstract
Infertility is a worldwide public health issue. Fifty percent of infertile couples are male-only. A number of male infertility etiologies are significantly influenced by chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical manifestations, however, differ according to the presence of aberrant chromosomes and distinct breakpoints. The reproductive effects of inversion are evident in those who carry it. The influence of inverted carriers on male infertility may be explained by the interchromosomal effect, although further research is still needed to determine the precise mechanism. Furthermore, selecting clinical reproductive technology presents difficulties for both physician and patients. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics of 4 males who have an inversion of chromosome 7, and to investigate the connection between the breakpoints of this chromosome and male infertility. For each patient, cytogenetic and semen analyses were carried out. Using PubMed or Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, relevant research and genes on breakpoints on chromosome 7 were found. This study includes 4 male infertile patients, all of whom had chromosome 7 inversions. 46,XY,inv(7)(p22q22), 46,XY,inv(7)(p21q11.2), 46,XY,inv(7)(p21q21), and 46,XY,inv(7)(p15q36) were the results of the cytogenetic analysis. Three cases of aberrant semen parameters were detected by semen detection. After a literature search, 21 cases of chromosome 7 inversion carriers were found. These carrier couples have varying reproductive histories. Among the 5 cases where semen parameters are available, 1 is azoospermia and 1 is oligoasthenozoospermia. Five significant genes on chromosome 7 have been linked to male infertility. Changes in semen parameters may be connected to the breakpoints 7q11, 7q21, 7q22, and 7q36. Physicians should take into account the relevant breakpoints when offering genetic counseling to patients who have chromosome 7 inversion.
Keywords: breakpoint, chromosome 7, genetic counseling, inversion, male infertility
1. Introduction
Fifty percent of infertile couples are male-only. Infertility is a worldwide public health issue.[1–3] The number of cases of male infertility has been rising annually in recent years.[4,5] Genetic factors play a crucial role in various etiologies of male infertility.[6,7] Chromosome abnormalities are a major genetic factor that is directly associated with male infertility. The various manifestations of male carriers are azoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, teratospermia, repeated spontaneous miscarriages of the spouse, and birth abnormalities in the offspring.[8–11] Clinical characteristics can also differ according to the presence of aberrant chromosomes and distinct breakpoints.[12–14] Because of this, genetic counseling is still challenging in clinical settings.
Carriers of chromosomal inversions clearly experience reproductive consequences.[15] The influence of inverted carriers on male infertility may be explained by the interchromosomal effect, although further research is still needed to determine the precise mechanism. But, recent studies have shown that infertile carriers with chromosome inversions are not affected by interchromosomal effects.[16] Moreover, inverted carriers display a variety of clinical symptoms along with different chromosomes and breakpoints. As a result, selecting clinical reproductive technology presents difficulties for both physicians and patients. Whether natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis or assisted reproductive technology accompanying preimplantation genetic diagnosis can be a choice in fertility counseling.[17]
The fertility issue of multiple chromosomes has been discussed. The most debated and extensively discussed link is that of chromosome 9 inversion and male infertility.[18–21] The reproductive problems associated with male chromosome 1, 2, 6, and 10 inversion carriers have been reviewed.[22–26] It is yet unknown, nevertheless, how the inversion of chromosome 7 and its breakpoint affect male infertility.
In order to better understand the connection between male infertility and chromosome 7 inversion breakpoints, this study looked at the clinical characteristics of 4 men who had the inversion and reviewed relevant cases reported in the literature.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study design and settings
An observational, retrospective study was conducted at the First Hospital of Tsinghua University and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Tsinghua University. The need for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective study design of this study.
2.2. Patients
This study included 4 male carriers of chromosomal inversion. Three patients came to the hospital for a checkup due to their wives not being pregnant after many years of marriage. Another man went to the doctor because his wife had often had spontaneous abortions. A questionnaire survey was completed by each patient, covering pertinent daily behaviors, environmental data, and a thorough family medical history. With their informed agreement, all patients underwent cytogenetic and semen analysis. Their spouses were also requested to provide gynecologic histories, karyotype results, and gynecological examinations at the same time.
2.3. Semen analysis
The World Health Organization’s recommended method for semen analysis was followed, and our published literature provides a thorough description of the operating methods.[14] For each patient, semen samples were collected following 3 to 7 days of sexual abstinence. Samples were obtained through masturbation and deposited into sterile containers. After a 30-minute liquefaction period at 37°C, semen parameters were analyzed. These parameters were detected using the computer-aided semen analysis (CASA) system (Beion S3, Shanghai Beion Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). Sperm motility was evaluated in at least 200 spermatozoa by analyzing various real-time images captured by the CASA system, with each sperm cell categorized as progressive motile, non-progressive motile, or immotile. No sperm in semen was diagnosed as azoospermia. Sperm concentrations below 1 × 106/mL were considered as severe oligozoospermia. Asthenospermia was identified when the percentage of sperm with progressive motility was <32%.
2.4. Cytogenetic analysis
We conducted a cytogenetic analysis using our published literature as a guide.[14] 2 mL of peripheral blood was extracted from each patient and placed in heparin anticoagulant tubes. 1 mL of heparin-anticoagulated peripheral blood was inoculated into lymphocyte culture medium, and sterile procedures were performed during this process. The inoculated culture medium was placed in a 37°C incubator and cultured for 72 hours. Then, colchicine at a concentration of 50 μg/mL was added, and continued to culture for 1 hour. The process of chromosome harvesting included hypotonic treatment, prefixation, triple fixation, preparation of cell suspension, and droplet preparation. Then, after trypsin treatment, Giemsa staining was performed for 5 to 10 minutes, followed by rinsing with water and air drying. G-banding was performed, followed by microscopic examination, counting 20 cells per case, and analyzing 6 karyotypes. Abnormal chromosomes were described according to the International System of Nomenclature for Human Cytogenetics (ISCN, 2020).[27]
2.5. Literature review
We searched PubMed for pertinent papers concerning the inversion of chromosome 7. Reproductive-age male cases were gathered, with instances involving women, malignancies, and prenatal diagnosis excluded. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (https://www.omim.org) was used to search for relevant genes on several breakpoints of chromosome 7 (7p12, 7q11, 7q21, 7q22, and 7q36) in order to examine the connection between chromosome 7 inversion and male infertility.
3. Results
Four male infertile patients who all had chromosome 7 inversions were included in this investigation. Male Case 1 was 26 years old and had a typical phenotype. His spouse experienced 3 successive unplanned miscarriages. Sperm parameters were found to be within the usual reference value range based on the results of the semen study. 46,XY,inv(7)(p22q22) was the result of the karyotype study (Fig. 1A). Case 2 had a normal phenotypic and was 29 years old. Semen analysis revealed severe oligozoospermia. 46,XY,inv (7)(p21q11.2) was the karyotype (Fig. 1B). Case 3 had a 28-year-old male patient with asthenospermia and a normal phenotype. 46,XY,inv (7)(p21q21) was the karyotype (Fig. 1C). The individual in Case 4 was 32 years old and had a typical phenotype. According to the results of the semen study, the patient had azoospermia. His karyotype, according to cytogenetic analysis, was 46,XY,inv(7)(p15q36) (Fig. 1D). Results from the spouses’ routine clinical genetic and gynecological examinations revealed no unusual changes.
Figure 1.
G-banding karyotypes of the 4 patients in this study.
By doing a literature search, 21 male carriers of the chromosome 7 inversion were found, allowing us to investigate the connection between this mutation and male infertility. Table 1 displays the clinical characteristics that were gathered for these instances. There were only 2 cases discovered: 1 with azoospermia and 1 with oligozoospermia. These 2 cases have karyotypes 46,XY,inv(7)(q22q31) and 46,XY inv(7)(q11.2; q22),respectively. The reproductive histories of these carrier spouses differed throughout the 21 cases. Seven of the cases had infertility, while the remaining ones had stillbirths, deformed children, or recurrent spontaneous miscarriages.
Table 1.
Clinical features of inversion carriers involving chromosome 7.
| Case | Karyotype | Seminal parameters | Reproductive history of the couple | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | inv(7)(p22q22) | N/A | Miscarriage | Demirhan et al[28] |
| 2 | inv(7)(p22q32) | N/A | A miscarriage | Winsor et al[29] |
| 3 | inv(7)(p21q34) | N/A | Reproductive failure | Gada Saxena et al[30] |
| 4 | inv(7)(p15q21) | N/A | Recurrent abortion | Portnoï et al[31] |
| 5 | inv(7)(p15q22) | N/A | Paternally inherited, 2 miscarriages | Dong et al[32] |
| 6 | inv(7)(p15q11.2) | N/A | Infertility | Yuan et al[33] |
| 7 | inv(7)(p13q21.1) | N/A | Infertility, PGT | Young et al[16] |
| 8 | inv(7)(p13q36) | Normozoospermia | Five first-trimester spontaneous abortions | Navarro et al[34] |
| 9 | inv(7)(p13q36) | N/A | Stillbirth | Li et al[35] |
| 10 | inv(7)(p13q36) | N/A | Recurrent spontaneous abortion | Zhang et al[36] |
| 11 | inv(7)(p12q32) | N/A | N/A | Rouen et al[37] |
| 12 | inv(7)(p11q21.1) | N/A | A malformation child | Vorsanova et al[38] |
| 13 | inv(7)(q11q22) | N/A | Fetus carrying the same inversion | Martin[39] |
| 14 | inv(7)(q11q36) | N/A | Recurrent spontaneous abortion | Tunç et al[40] |
| 15 | inv(7)(p11.2q11.2) | N/A | Infertility, ART | Jesus et al[41] |
| 16 | inv(7)(q11.2q22) | N/A | Recurrent fetal wastage | Fryns and Van Buggenhout[42] |
| 17 | inv(7) (q11.2;q22) | Oligoasthenozoospermia | Paternal | Peschka et al[43] |
| 18 | inv(7)(q22q34) | N/A | Infertility | Li et al[44] |
| 19 | inv(7)(q22q34) | Normozoospermia | Infertility, paternally inherited | Faed et al[45] |
| 20 | inv(7)(q22q31) | Azoospermia | Infertility | Ichioka et al[46] |
| 21 | inv(7)(q22.1q31.2) | Normozoospermia | Infertility, paternally inherited | Matsuda et al[47] |
ART = assisted reproductive technology, N/A = not applicable, PGT = preimplantation genetic testing.
Relevant genes at these breakpoints were examined in order to explore more about the connection between male infertility and these chromosome 7 breakpoints related to inversion (Table 2). There were 5 significant genes linked to male infertility identified. The ZPBP gene is associated with globozoospermia and is found on chromosome 7p12. Extreme oligozoospermia is tightly associated with the 7q11 gene FKBP6. The CFAP69 gene is associated with asthenospermia and is found on chromosome 7q21. The genes STAG3 and XRCC2, which are strongly associated with azoospermia, are found on chromosomes 7q22 and 7q36, respectively.
Table 2.
Important genes and its functions related to the breakpoints on chromosome 7.
| Breakpoint | Gene | Full name of gene | Loci | Expression or Function | Clinical findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7p12 |
ZPBP (608,498) |
Zona pellucida-binding protein | 7p12.2 | Localization of ZPBP to the acrosome in human spermatids | Globozoospermia |
| 7q11 |
FKBP6 (604,839) |
Fk506-binding protein 6 | 7q11.23 | Exceptionally high expression in testis | Extreme oligozoospermia |
| 7q21 |
CFAP69 (617,949) |
Cilia- and flagella- associated protein 69 | 7q21.13 | CFAP69 localized to the midpiece of human sperm flagellum | Asthenospermia |
| 7q22 |
STAG3 (608,489) |
Stromal antigen 3 | 7q22.1 | STAG3 is essential for proper pairing and segregation of chromosomes during meiosis | Nonobstructive azoospermia |
| 7q36 | XRCC2 (600,375) | X-ray repair cross complementing 2 | 7q36.1 | XRCC2 involved in homologous recombination repair of DNA damage | Azoospermia |
N/A = not applicable.
4. Discussion
Worldwide, cytogenetic technology is still a highly effective and reasonably priced clinical diagnostic method.[48,49] Before introducing infertile males to therapy, this technique is advised.[50] The carrier’s fertility is thought to be impacted by the chromosomes and breakpoints implicated in the rearrangement.[51] A chromosomal breakpoint may indicate an imbalance in the genome or result in modifications to the gene dosage, both of which might impact spermatogenesis.[52] Male infertility has been linked to many chromosomal inversion breakpoints, however, it is yet unknown how chromosome 7 inversion carriers will fare in terms of fertility.
On chromosome 7, there are several significant genes whose expressed proteins are linked to different human disorders. For instance, it is previously known that male infertility is linked to the CFTR gene. The gene, which is located on chromosome 7, is necessary for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein to be produced and transported in its intact and functional form.[53] PDE1C is abundantly expressed in the human heart and some areas of the brain and is in charge of hydrolyzing the second messenger chemicals cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic guanosinc monophosphate. The inversion of chromosome 7 disrupts PDE1C, leading to developmental delay in the carrier.[54] Four male infertile patients who all have chromosome 7 inversions are reported in this study. Three of these 4 patients had aberrant semen parameters. Chromosome 7 inversion was found in a patient with azoospermia according to Ichioka et al.[46] This led to the hypothesis that chromosomes 7q22-31 could be the cause of the patient’s defective spermatogenesis. Thus, more study is required to determine whether chromosome 7 inversion and male infertility are related.
We discovered that these carriers had a variety of clinical characteristics by compiling the instances that have been described in the literature. Seven of the cases had infertility,[16,33,41,44–47] while the remaining ones included stillbirth, recurrent spontaneous miscarriages, or children with deformities.[28–32,34–40,42,43] Regretfully, the semen quality in most cases is not available (Table 1). One is azoospermia and 1 is oligoasthenozoospermia. There were only 2 cases discovered: 1 with azoospermia and 1 with oligozoospermia. The karyotypes of the 2 patients are linked to the 7q22 chromosomal breakpoint. Case 1 in this study had a karyotype that includes 7q22, but the semen values are within normal limits. Therefore, it remains challenging to provide genetic counseling to patients based only on chromosomal inversion breakpoints.
Relevant genes at some breakpoints of chromosome 7 were summarized (Table 2). There are some genes on chromosomes 7p12, 7q11, 7q21, 7q22, and 7q36 that correspond to ZPBP, FKBP6, CFAP69, STAG3, and XRCC2, respectively. ZPBP protein plays an early structural role during spermiogenesis.[55] According to Oud et al,[56] a Moroccan male patient had homozygosity for a nonsense mutation in the ZPBP gene, which resulted in globozoospermia. Male fertility and meiotic homologous chromosomal pairing are significantly impacted by the FKBP6 gene.[57] According to Wyrwoll et al,[58] 3 male patients with homozygous mutations in the FKBP6 gene experience severe oligozoospermia. The construction and stability of flagella in sperm cells depend on the CFAP69 protein.[59] According to He et al,[60] asthenospermia is linked to the CFAP69 gene mutation because of several sperm flagella morphological defects. For the chromosomes to properly pair and segregate during meiosis, the STAG3 protein is necessary.[61] Meiotic arrest renders a male German carrier of a compound heterozygous condition in the STAG3 gene infertile.[62] The RAD51 gene family, which includes the XRCC2 gene, codes for proteins that aid in the repair of DNA damage through homologous recombination.[63] According to Yang et al,[64] azoospermia resulting from meiotic arrest was seen in 2 male carriers who possessed homozygous mutations in the XRCC2 gene. Male infertility may result from structural chromosomal abnormalities that impair the activity of variant genes.[65] We hypothesize that the disruption of associated genes at these breakpoints may be connected to the variations in semen parameters seen in the 3 patients in our investigation. Undoubtedly, additional clinical case data needs to be gathered.
The limitation of this study is that the number of cases is small, and semen parameters of the retrieved cases in the literature are mostly not applicable. No molecular genetics experiments were conducted.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study discussed the reproductive problems of these carriers while reporting 4 cases and recovering 21 males with chromosome 7 inversion. Breakpoints 7q11, 7q21, 7q22, and 7q36 have been found to have variable final reproductive results, which may be related to variations in semen characteristics. Physicians should take into account the relevant breakpoints when offering genetic counseling to patients who have chromosomal 7 inversion.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Zhiqiang Song, Ranwei Li.
Data curation: Zhiqiang Song, Jianchen Wu.
Investigation: Qiuyu Wang, Ranwei Li.
Writing – original draft: Zhiqiang Song.
Writing – review & editing: Ranwei Li.
Abbreviations:
- CFAP69
- Cilia- and flagella- associated protein 69
- FKBP6
- Fk506-binding protein 6
- PDE1C
- phosphodiesterase 1c
- STAG3
- stromal antigen 3
- XRCC2
- X-ray repair cross complementing 2
- ZPBP
- zona pellucida-binding protein.
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
How to cite this article: Song Z, Wang Q, Wu J, Li R. Fertility problems in men carrying chromosome 7 inversion: A retrospective, observational study. Medicine 2025;104:3(e41358).
Contributor Information
Zhiqiang Song, Email: eustace_001@163.com.
Qiuyu Wang, Email: wangqy2020@qq.com.
Jianchen Wu, Email: Wujianchen0524@163.com.
References
- [1].Cannarella R, Marino M, Condorelli RA, La Vignera S, Calogero AE. Is it time for andrology and endocrinology professionals in assisted reproduction centers? World J Mens Health. 2023;41:796–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Kooli R, Sallem A, Chebil D, et al. Factors associated with anxiety and depression in men undergoing fertility investigations: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol. 2023;11:299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Correnti S, Preianò M, Fregola A, et al. Seminal plasma untargeted metabolomic and lipidomic profiling for the identification of a novel panel of biomarkers and therapeutic targets related to male infertility. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1275832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Yang W, Hua R, Cao Y, He X. A metabolomic perspective on the mechanisms by which environmental pollutants and lifestyle lead to male infertility. Andrology. 2024;12:719–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Bajard L, Vespalcová H, Negi CK, Kohoutek J, Bláha L, Sovadinová I. Anti-androgenic activity of novel flame retardants in mixtures: Newly identified contribution from tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) isocyanurate (TDBP-TAZTO). Chemosphere. 2023;341:140004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Kyrgiafini MA, Giannoulis T, Chatziparasidou A, Christoforidis N, Mamuris Z. Unveiling the genetic complexity of teratozoospermia: integrated genomic analysis reveals novel insights into lncRNAs’ Role in Male Infertility. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Zhou J, Zhang B, Zeb A, et al. A recessive ACTL7A founder variant leads to male infertility due to acrosome detachment in Pakistani Pashtuns. Clin Genet. 2023;104:564–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Zhang Y, Zhan P, Wang Y, Tian W, Yang X, Wang X. Association between chromosome 6p21 translocation and asthenozoospermia: a retrospective, observational study. Medicine (Baltim). 2023;102:e34318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Yovinska S, Belemezova K, Hristova-Savova M, et al. Correlation between cytogenetic findings and spermatogenic failure in bulgarian infertile men. Life (Basel). 2022;12:1840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Huang S, Huang Y, Li S, He Y. Chromosome 17 translocation affects sperm morphology: two case studies and literature review. Andrologia. 2022;54:e14620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Park SJ, Min JY, Kang JS, Yang B-G, Hwang S-Y, Han S-H. Chromosomal abnormalities of 19,000 couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:1015–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Kim JW, Chang EM, Song SH, Park SH, Yoon TK, Shim SH. Complex chromosomal rearrangements in infertile males: complexity of rearrangement affects spermatogenesis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:349–52.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Zhang H, Wang R, Li L, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Liu R. Clinical feature of infertile men carrying balanced translocations involving chromosome 10: case series and a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltim). 2018;97:e0452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Li R. Fertility problems in men carrying a translocation involved in breakpoints on chromosome 17p13: a retrospective, observational study. Medicine (Baltim). 2022;101:e32216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Anton E, Vidal F, Egozcue J, Blanco J. Genetic reproductive risk in inversion carriers. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:661–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Young D, Klepacka D, McGarvey M, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Infertility patients with chromosome inversions are not susceptible to an inter-chromosomal effect. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:509–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Tong J, Jiang J, Niu Y, Zhang T. Do chromosomal inversion carriers really need preimplantation genetic testing? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:2573–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Mottola F, Santonastaso M, Ronga V, Finelli R, Rocco L. Polymorphic rearrangements of human chromosome 9 and male infertility: new evidence and impact on spermatogenesis. Biomolecules. 2023;13:729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Mozdarani H, Meybodi AM, Karimi H. Impact of pericentric inversion of Chromosome 9 [inv (9) (p11q12)] on infertility. Indian J Hum Genet. 2007;13:26–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Alhalabi MM, Kakaje A, Alhalabi M. Hereditary chromosomal 9 inversion (p22q13) 9 as a cause for recurrent pregnancy loss: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17:427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Xie X, Li F, Tan W, Tang J. Analysis of the clinical features of pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520957820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Balasar O, Zamani AG, Balasar M, Acar H. Male infertility associated with de novo pericentric inversion of chromosome 1. Turk J Urol. 2017;43:560–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Li R, Fan H, Zhang Q, Yang X, Zhan P, Feng S. Pericentric inversion in chromosome 1 and male infertility. Open Med (Wars). 2020;15:343–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Yapan C, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci C, Kahraman S. The largest paracentric inversion, the highest rate of recombinant spermatozoa. case report: 46,XY, inv(2)(q21.2q37.3) and literature review. Balkan J Med Genet. 2014;17:55–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Fan H, Liu Z, Zhan P, Jia G. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 6 and male fertility problems. Open Med (Wars). 2022;17:191–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Zhang X, Shi Q, Liu Y, et al. Fertility problems in males carrying an inversion of chromosome 10. Open Med (Wars). 2021;16:316–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].McGowan-Jordan J, Hastings RJ, Moore S. ISCN 2020: An international System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2020) Karger. Basel, Switzerland: Karger Publishers. 2020:399–423. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Demirhan O, Ozcan K, Taştemir D, et al. Inheritance of pericentric inversion in chromosome 7 through the three progenies and a newborn with congenital hydronephrosis diagnosed prenatally by fetal urine sampling. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:228.e1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Winsor EJ, Palmer CG, Ellis PM, Hunter JL, Ferguson-Smith MA. Meiotic analysis of a pericentric inversion, inv(7) (p22q32), in the father of a child with a duplication-deletion of chromosome 7. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1978;20:169–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Gada Saxena S, Desai K, Shewale L, Ranjan P, Saranath D. Chromosomal aberrations in 2000 couples of Indian ethnicity with reproductive failure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:209–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Portnoï MF, Joye N, van den Akker J, Morlier G, Taillemite JL. Karyotypes of 1142 couples with recurrent abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:31–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Dong Y, Li LL, Wang RX, Yu XW, Yun X, Liu RZ. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of chromosome abnormalities or polymorphisms. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:2849–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Yuan J, Jin L, Wang M, Wei S, Zhu G, Xu B. Detection of chromosome aberrations in 17 054 individuals with fertility problems and their subsequent assisted reproductive technology treatments in Central China. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(Suppl 2):ii34–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Navarro J, Benet J, Martorell MR, Templado C, Egozcue J. Segregation analysis in a man heterozygous for a pericentric inversion of chromosome 7 (p13;q36) by sperm chromosome studies. Am J Hum Genet. 1993;53:214–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Li D, Zhang H, Wang R, Zhu H, Li L, Liu R. Chromosomal abnormalities in men with pregestational and gestational infertility in northeast China. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:829–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Zhang Z, Gao H, Li S, Hong M, Liu R. Chromosomal abnormalities in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortions in northeast China. J Reprod Med. 2011;56:321–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Rouen A, Carlier L, Heide S, et al. Potential selection of genetically balanced spermatozoa based on the hypo-osmotic swelling test in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:372–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY, Demidova IA, Kolotii AD, Soloviev IV, Yurov YB. Pericentric inversion inv(7)(p11q21.1): report on two cases and genotype-phenotype correlations. Tsitol Genet. 2006;40:45–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Martin RH. Sperm chromosome analysis in a man heterozygous for a paracentric inversion of chromosome 7 (q11q22). Hum Genet. 1986;73:97–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Tunç E, Tanriverdi N, Demirhan O, Süleymanova D, Çetinel N. Chromosomal analyses of 1510 couples who have experienced recurrent spontaneous abortions. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32:414–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Jesus AR, Silva-Soares S, Silva J, Severo M, Barros A, Dória S. Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1471–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Fryns JP, Van Buggenhout G. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:171–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Peschka B, Leygraaf J, Van der Ven K, et al. Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2257–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Li HG, Fan LH, Liu B, et al. The association between the two more common genetic causes of spermatogenic failure: a 7-year retrospective study. Asian J Androl. 2020;22:642–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Faed MJ, Robertson J, Lamont MA, et al. A cytogenetic survey of men being investigated for subfertility. J Reprod Fertil. 1979;56:209–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Ichioka K, Yoshimura K, Honda T, Takahashi A, Terai A. Paracentric inversion of chromosome 7(q22-31) associated with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:455–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Matsuda T, Horii Y, Ogura K, Nonomura M, Okada K, Yoshida O. Chromosomal survey of 1001 subfertile males: incidence and clinical features of males with chromosomal anomalies. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1992;38:803–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Pasquier L, Fradin M, Chérot E, et al. Karyotype is not dead (yet)! Eur J Med Genet. 2016;59:11–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Andó S, Koczok K, Bessenyei B, Balogh I, Ujfalusi A. Cytogenetic investigation of infertile patients in hungary: a 10-Year Retrospective Study. Genes (Basel). 2022;13:2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Abbaspour S, Isazadeh A, Heidari M, et al. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in iranian patients with infertility. Arch Iran Med. 2023;26:110–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Nguyen MH, Morel F, Pennamen P, et al. Balanced complex chromosome rearrangement in male infertility: case report and literature review. Andrologia. 2015;47:178–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Huang S, Wu H, Qi Y, Wei L, Lv X, He Y. Case Report: Balanced reciprocal translocation t (17; 22) (p11.2; q11.2) and 10q23.31 microduplication in an infertile male patient suffering from teratozoospermia. Front Genet. 2022;13:797813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Bieniek JM, Lapin CD, Jarvi KA. Genetics of CFTR and male infertility. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10:1391–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Gamage TH, Misceo D, Fannemel M, Frengen E. A balanced de novo inv(7)(p14.3q22.3) disrupting PDE1C and ATXN7L1 in a 14-year old developmentally delayed boy. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56:361–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Lin YN, Roy A, Yan W, Burns KH, Matzuk MM. Loss of zona pellucida binding proteins in the acrosomal matrix disrupts acrosome biogenesis and sperm morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:6794–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Oud MS, Okutman O, Hendricks LAJ, et al. Exome sequencing reveals novel causes as well as new candidate genes for human globozoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:240–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Crackower MA, Kolas NK, Noguchi J, et al. Essential role of Fkbp6 in male fertility and homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis. Science. 2003;300:1291–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Wyrwoll MJ, Gaasbeek CM, Golubickaite I, et al. ; Genetics of Male Infertility Initiative (GEMINI) consortium. The piRNA-pathway factor FKBP6 is essential for spermatogenesis but dispensable for control of meiotic LINE-1 expression in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109:1850–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Dong FN, Amiri-Yekta A, Martinez G, et al. Absence of CFAP69 causes male infertility due to multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella in human and mouse. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:636–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].He X, Li W, Wu H, et al. Novel homozygous CFAP69 mutations in humans and mice cause severe asthenoteratospermia with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. J Med Genet. 2019;56:96–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Caburet S, Arboleda VA, Llano E, et al. Mutant cohesin in premature ovarian failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:943–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].van der Bijl N, Röpke A, Biswas U, et al. Mutations in the stromal antigen 3 (STAG3) gene cause male infertility due to meiotic arrest. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:2112–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Tambini CE, George AM, Rommens JM, Tsui LC, Scherer SW, Thacker J. The XRCC2 DNA repair gene: identification of a positional candidate. Genomics. 1997;41:84–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Yang Y, Guo J, Dai L, et al. XRCC2 mutation causes meiotic arrest, azoospermia and infertility. J Med Genet. 2018;55:628–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Sahota JS, Sharma B, Guleria K, Sambyal V. Candidate genes for infertility: an in-silico study based on cytogenetic analysis. BMC Med Genomics. 2022;15:170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

