Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76208

Analysis of Cellular DNA Content in Pleural Effusion by Flow Cytometry During Lung Cancer Progression: A Case Report

Maria M Vasilescu 1, Marieta E Panait 2, Mirela Dumitru 1,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11750209  PMID: 39840198

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common feature in patients with advanced or metastatic malignancies. While significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of pleural effusions, further research is needed to uncover the subsequent behavior of tumor cells following their invasion into the pleural space. This report utilizes flow cytometry to analyze DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) and cell cycle status, shedding light on the tumor cell populations present in MPE samples from a patient with lung adenocarcinoma during treatment. The findings suggest that under selective pressure, certain tumor cell subpopulations within the pleural effusion were suppressed, while therapy-resistant subpopulations emerged, driving disease progression. MPE serves as a valuable model for studying tumor heterogeneity and clonal dynamics in real time, offering insights that may inform diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: aneuploidy, cellular dna content, flow cytometry, lung cancer, pleural effusion

Introduction

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE), defined as the presence of malignant cells in pleural fluid, arises due to direct or indirect involvement of the pleura [1]. MPE is observed in 8-15% of patients at initial evaluation and in 40-50% during disease progression. The most frequent cause of MPE is lung cancer, followed by breast cancer, lymphoma, gynecological malignancies, mesothelioma, and cases with unknown primary sites. Interestingly, only 55-60% of patients with pleural metastasis develop MPE [2]. Adenocarcinoma, the most common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is frequently associated with MPE, and its presence often indicates an advanced disease stage or progression [3].

For decades, cytological examination of pleural fluid has been the first-line diagnostic tool for pleural effusion and suspected malignancy. It remains widely used, with significant implications for determining subsequent investigations. However, the sensitivity of cytological examination for detecting malignancy varies widely, ranging from 40% to 87% [4]. To address these limitations, new methods have been introduced to enhance the identification of tumor cells and improve the accuracy of conventional cytological diagnosis. Among these, flow cytometry has demonstrated utility in analyzing body fluids such as pleural effusion, effectively distinguishing between normal and malignant cell populations [5,6].

In this study, we explored the cellular heterogeneity within MPE samples from a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. Using flow cytometry analysis of DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) and cell cycle status, we assessed the tumor cell populations in pleural fluid over the course of treatment. This approach enabled us to monitor the dynamics of tumor subpopulations under selective pressure, providing valuable insights into disease progression.

Case presentation

A 38-year-old female non-smoker presented to our hospital with right-sided chest pain, loss of appetite, severe dyspnea, and weight loss. The patient had no history of significant comorbidities. Clinical examination revealed right-sided pleural effusion syndrome, and blood tests showed anemia and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (Table 1). The diagnosis was a right hilar lung tumor (adenocarcinoma) with right pleurisy due to adenocarcinoma metastasis.

Table 1. Patient’s blood tests at presentation.

Parameters (units) Values Reference range
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.8 12-14
Hematocrit (%) 36 36-48
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) 44 <22
Glucose (mg/dL) 83 70-115
Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (U/L) 4 <34
Glutamic pyruvic transaminase (U/L) 4 <55
Urea (mg/dL) 20 15-40

The patient received five consecutive cycles of polychemotherapy, including platinum compounds (Paraplatin), gemcitabine (Gemzar), taxanes (Taxotere), vinca alkaloid (Eldesine), alpha interferons (INTRON A), and antiestrogens (Tamoxifen). Iscador, an extract of Viscum album, was used as an adjuvant to chemotherapy. Following the initiation of chemotherapy, therapeutic thoracenteses and intracavitary instillations of thiotepa, an alkylating agent, were performed during each round of treatment to prevent the recurrence of pleural effusion. The patient’s medical condition and blood count parameters at the time of thoracentesis are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

Table 2. Medical condition at the time of thoracentesis.

Thoracentesis (number) Medical condition at the time of thoracentesis
I Hilar lung tumor with right metastatic adenocarcinoma pleurisy; profound dyspnea
II Condition slightly improved
III Alteration of general condition; dyspnea with orthopnea; pulmonary metastases
IV Moderate condition; pain at the right hemithorax
V Stationary condition; bone (costal) metastases
VI Alteration of the general condition

Table 3. Blood count parameters at the time of thoracentesis.

Parameters (units) Values Reference range
Thoracentesis (number)
I II III IV V VI
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 11 12.2 12.4 11.2 10.8 8.6 12-14
White blood cell (× 103/µL) 6 7.8 4.2 5 7.4 4 5-10
Platelet count (× 103/µL) 150 150 160 190 210 170 150-450
Neutrophils, absolute (× 103/µL) 3 5.4 0.8 1.5 4.6 1.2 2.5-7.5
Eosinophils, absolute (× 103/µL) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.02-0.5
Basophils, absolute (× 103/µL) 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0.0-0.2
Lymphocytes, absolute (× 103/µL) 2 2 2.5 2.7 2 1.8 1-4
Monocytes, absolute (× 103/µL) 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.1-1.3

Six serial samples of recurrent pleural effusion, collected throughout the course of treatment, were analyzed for cellular DNA content and cell cycle phases by flow cytometry. The pleural effusion samples were obtained via thoracentesis before the start of each round of treatment. The percentage of cell populations, DNA ploidy (expressed as DNA index, DI), and cell cycle distribution of pleural fluid cells were determined from the single-parameter histograms (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Cell cycle distribution in MPE analyzed by flow cytometry.

Figure 1

(A) Cell cycle histogram profile of pleural effusion before therapy initiation. (B) Cell cycle histogram profile of pleural effusion one month after the first therapy administration. (C) Cell cycle histogram profile of pleural effusion one month after the second round of treatment. (D) Cell cycle histogram profile of pleural effusion one month after the third round of treatment. (E) Cell cycle histogram profile of pleural effusion one month after the fourth round of treatment. (F) Cell cycle histogram profile of pleural effusion one month after the fifth round of treatment.

MPE, malignant pleural effusion

DNA ploidy analysis of the specimen collected before the initiation of therapy (Figure 1A) revealed a tumor cell population with abnormal DNA content, identified by a near-triploid peak (DI = 1.44) in the DNA histogram. This population comprised 42.9% of cells, with 89.7% in the G0/G1 phase and 9.6% in the S-phase. One month after the first combination therapy (Figure 1B), the near-triploid tumor population (DI = 1.53), representing 20.4% of cells, showed a decrease in the percentage of cells in G0/G1 and S-phases, accompanied by a simultaneous G2/M phase arrest. After another month of treatment (Figure 1C), a much smaller near-triploid population (DI = 1.41), representing 14% of cells, exhibited increased S-phase and G2/M phase proportions compared to previous analyses. The following month (Figure 1D), an aneuploid population with slightly hyperdiploid DNA content (DI = 1.18) became dominant, comprising 51.7% of the cells. This population showed 34.8% in the S-phase and 2.1% in the G2/M phase. The analysis conducted after four months of treatment (Figure 1E) revealed a decrease in the hyperdiploid population to 41%, with 20% in the S-phase and 16% in the G2/M phase. One month later (Figure 1F), tumor populations shifted, with a near-triploid population (DI = 1.44) characterized by lower S-phase and higher G0/G1 phase proportions. The final analysis of pleural fluid showed a cell cycle profile similar to that observed before treatment. The percentage distribution of cell cycle phases within aneuploid populations for each of the six serial pleural effusion samples is summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Quantitative cell cycle analysis of aneuploid populations.

Figure 2

At the time of the sixth thoracentesis, the patient presented with anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia (Table 3). Unfortunately, after five rounds of treatment, the patient showed no favorable clinical outcome and did not return for further treatment.

Discussion

The management of MPE remains a topic of debate, and the lack of effective treatment options underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the basic biological aspects of pleural metastasis and malignant effusion accumulation. The coexistence of diverse clonal populations of tumor cells is characteristic of both primary tumors and metastases [7]. Tumors are dynamic, evolving entities, and clonal heterogeneity can vary spatially and temporally. As the disease progresses, tumors may exhibit differences in their clonal composition. Various factors, including the acquisition of driver mutations and selective pressures from the microenvironment or therapeutic interventions, can influence tumor heterogeneity [8]. Several studies have shown that drug-resistant subpopulations can exist prior to therapy and may expand during treatment. For example, during sequential monotherapy with epirubicin and docetaxel in primary breast cancer, smaller subclones redistributed, while major subclones persisted throughout treatment [9]. Schwarz et al. found that subclonal tumor populations in high-grade serous ovarian cancer pre-treatment biopsies continued to evolve during chemotherapy, ultimately leading to relapse [10].

In line with these findings, our case study revealed that under chemotherapy, certain subpopulations of tumor cells from pleural effusion were suppressed, while therapy-resistant subpopulations dominated, leading to disease progression. Previous studies on DNA ploidy in lung tumors and pleural effusions have shown a high level of aneuploidy in lung cancer [11-14]. Aneuploidy occurs in approximately 60% of NSCLCs, and in small-cell lung cancer, the incidence is 77.8% [15]. Overall, evidence suggests that MPEs predominantly exhibit aneuploid DNA content, while benign effusions typically present with euploid DNA [16].

Aneuploidy can contribute to the development and selection of malignant clones, driving phenotypic diversification during tumor progression [15]. In their review of clinical applications for aneuploidy in NSCLC, Yan et al. proposed aneuploidy as a new biomarker, with multiple studies linking high levels of aneuploidy to increased invasiveness, poor prognosis, and metastasis in NSCLC [15]. A strong association has also been observed between the degree of aneuploidy and resistance to chemotherapy, particularly with drugs that inhibit cell division. This association is also present with non-cell cycle-specific chemotherapies [17]. For patients with malignant involvement of the serous cavities, combined systemic chemotherapy with drugs acting through different mechanisms may improve survival outcomes. The patient in this study received such treatment but still experienced unfavorable progression. Analysis of cellular DNA content in MPE samples revealed the maintenance of aneuploid status throughout treatment, which was associated with metastases at different sites and resistance to treatment. Chromosomal instability due to aneuploidy influences therapeutic outcomes under selective pressure, such as chemotherapy regimens, promoting the survival of subclones that acquire resistance to specific chemotherapeutics [18,19].

A key aspect of this study is that DNA content analysis was conducted using only flow cytometry, which considered only the DNA content of the dominant cell population and not the morphology of the cells. Additionally, the small size of the available tissue biopsy limited the ability to perform further tests, such as immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions

The presence of tumor populations with aneuploid DNA is a known indicator of aggressiveness in tumor lesions and is associated with a poorer prognosis in most cases. While our case report is not the first to utilize pleural effusion to detect aneuploidy in patients with NSCLC, it provides unique insight into the variation of dominant tumor subpopulations during chemotherapeutic intervention in MPE samples from a lung adenocarcinoma patient. This was achieved through flow cytometry analysis of DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) and cell cycle status. Our findings support the use of ploidy analysis as a valuable tool for monitoring tumor progression. Future studies should confirm aneuploidy through methods such as FISH, PCR, or image cytometry. MPE may serve as a valuable model for studying tumor heterogeneity and clonal dynamics in real time. The presence of cellular heterogeneity poses a significant challenge in cancer therapy, as various subpopulations can evolve in response to treatment, leading to dynamic heterogeneity and, ultimately, resistance to therapy.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Ethics Commission of the Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu issued approval 2022/4497.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Maria M. Vasilescu

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Maria M. Vasilescu, Marieta E. Panait, Mirela Dumitru

Drafting of the manuscript:  Maria M. Vasilescu, Marieta E. Panait, Mirela Dumitru

Supervision:  Maria M. Vasilescu, Mirela Dumitru

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Mirela Dumitru

References

  • 1.Diagnosis and management options in malignant pleural effusions. Dixit R, Agarwal KC, Gokhroo A, Patil CB, Meena M, Shah NS, Arora P. Lung India. 2017;34:160–166. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.201305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Malignant pleural effusion and its current management: a review. Skok K, Hladnik G, Grm A, Crnjac A. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019;55 doi: 10.3390/medicina55080490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients with malignant pleural effusion. Wu SG, Yu CJ, Tsai MF, et al. Eur Respir J. 2013;41:1409–1418. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00069812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology. Arnold DT, De Fonseka D, Perry S, et al. Eur Respir J. 2018;52 doi: 10.1183/13993003.01254-2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flow cytometry method as a diagnostic tool for pleural fluid involvement in a patient with multiple myeloma. Keklik M, Sivgin S, Pala C, et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2012;4:0. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2012.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Detection of metastatic lung cancer by immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry in a sample of pleural fluid. Reis ML, Pilon R, Costa AB, et al. Int J Med Pharm Case Rep. 2016;7:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution during metastasis in breast cancer patient-derived tumor xenograft models. Sprouffske K, Kerr G, Li C, et al. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Breast cancer intra-tumor heterogeneity. Martelotto LG, Ng CK, Piscuoglio S, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:210. doi: 10.1186/bcr3658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clonal evolution in primary breast cancers under sequential epirubicin and docetaxel monotherapy. Venizelos A, Engebrethsen C, Deng W, et al. Genome Med. 2022;14:86. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01090-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a phylogenetic analysis. Schwarz RF, Ng CK, Cooke SL, et al. PLoS Med. 2015;12:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prognostic significance of flow cytometry in non-small-cell lung cancer. Rice TW, Bauer TW, Gephardt GN, Medendorp SV, McLain DA, Kirby TJ. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:210–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Five-year follow-up study of independent clinical and flow cytometric prognostic factors for the survival of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Volm M, Hahn EW, Mattern J, Müller T, Vogt-Moykopf I, Weber E. https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/48/10/2923/492451/ Cancer Res. 1988;48:2923–2928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Flow cytometric evaluation of bronchoscopic washings and lavage fluid for DNA aneuploidy as an adjunct in the diagnosis of lung cancer and tumors metastatic to the lung. Yoss EB, Berd D, Cohn JR, Peters SP. Chest. 1989;96:54–59. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Comparison of nucleolar organiser regions and DNA flow cytometry in the evaluation of pleural effusion. Huang MS, Tsai MS, Hwang JJ, Wang TH. Thorax. 1994;49:1152–1156. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.11.1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clinical applications of aneuploidies in evolution of NSCLC patients: current status and application prospect. Yan X, Liu SM, Liu C. Onco Targets Ther. 2022;15:1355–1368. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S380016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Routine DNA cytometry of benign and malignant pleural effusions by means of the remote quantitation server Euroquant: a prospective study. Kayser K, Blum S, Beyer M, Haroske G, Kunze KD, Meyer W. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:760–764. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.10.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aneuploidy increases resistance to chemotherapeutics by antagonizing cell division. Replogle JM, Zhou W, Amaro AE, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:30566–30576. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009506117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chromosomal instability accelerates the evolution of resistance to anti-cancer therapies. Lukow DA, Sausville EL, Suri P, et al. Dev Cell. 2021;56:2427–2439. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gene copy-number changes and chromosomal instability induced by aneuploidy confer resistance to chemotherapy. Ippolito MR, Martis V, Martin S, et al. Dev Cell. 2021;56:2440–2454. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES