Abstract
Motivation
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been remarkably successful in identifying associations between genetic variants and imaging-derived phenotypes. To date, the main focus of these analyses has been on established, clinically-used imaging features. We sought to investigate if deep learning approaches can detect more nuanced patterns of image variability.
Results
We used an autoencoder to represent retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images from 31 135 UK Biobank participants. For each subject, we obtained a 64-dimensional vector representing features of retinal structure. GWAS of these autoencoder-derived imaging parameters identified 118 statistically significant loci; 41 of these associations were also significant in a replication study. These loci encompassed variants previously linked with retinal thickness measurements, ophthalmic disorders, and/or neurodegenerative conditions. Notably, the generated retinal phenotypes were found to contribute to predictive models for glaucoma and cardiovascular disorders. Overall, we demonstrate that self-supervised phenotyping of OCT images enhances the discoverability of genetic factors influencing retinal morphology and provides epidemiologically informative biomarkers.
Availability and implementation
Code and data links available at https://github.com/tf2/autoencoder-oct.
1 Introduction
Imaging technologies have greatly enhanced the scope and precision of phenotype discovery. A wide range of imaging-derived phenotypes are easily amenable to human identification and are routinely used in biomedical contexts, including in clinical practice (Oren et al. 2020). However, to capture the complexity of human biology, there is a need to go beyond traditional clinically-focused and/or expert-curated imaging features (Gong et al. 2022).
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are machine learning models inspired by information processing in biological neural networks (LeCun et al. 2015, Hinton 2018, Hasson et al. 2020). ANNs can be used to extract granular information from images without introducing certain biases associated with human curation. An autoencoder is a type of ANN that is designed to transform an input set of data into a lower-dimensional code (i.e. a set of latent space variables or “embeddings”) and then to recreate the input from the encoded representation (Hinton and Salakhutdinov 2006, Michelucci 2022). Broadly, autoencoders can be used to efficiently compress an image by identifying the key features that lead to optimal reconstruction performance.
The most optically accessible part of the central nervous system is the retina, the multilayered tissue that lines the back of the eyes. The retina is particularly vulnerable to disease, and disruption of its normal architecture (e.g. in conditions like age-related macular degeneration or glaucoma) can lead to visual disability (Sheffield and Stone 2011, Zhao et al. 2024). Examination of the retina relies, to a great extent, on imaging, especially the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT is a noninvasive, non-contact method for cross-sectional imaging that has a resolution approaching that of histopathology (Bouma et al. 2022). Application of ANN-based algorithms in OCT image processing is attracting increasing attention with key advantages including the rapid speed, high consistency and quantitative nature of the analyses (De Fauw et al. 2018, Yim et al. 2020, Keenan et al. 2021).
To date, genetic studies of imaging phenotypes have mostly focused on features associated with long-established clinical diagnostic processes (Elliott et al. 2018, Xie et al. 2024). In our own previous work, we used standardized OCT-derived thickness measurements of the inner (Currant et al. 2021) and outer (Currant et al. 2023) retinal layers to good effect, discovering previously unreported genetic associations and exploring relationships with disease. Here, we performed genomic analyses on OCT imaging phenotypes extracted using a self-supervised, autoencoder-based approach. We highlight the autoencoder’s ability to derive biologically meaningful phenotypes (with association to genetic variants not seen in previous studies) and to contribute to predictive models for health outcomes such as glaucoma and cardiovascular conditions.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Cohort characteristics
We used data from the UK Biobank, a biomedical resource containing genomic and health information from >500 000 individuals from across the United Kingdom (Bycroft et al. 2018). UK Biobank participants were recruited between 2006 and 2010 and were, at enrollment, between 40 and 69 years of age. At the initial assessment, UK Biobank volunteers provided consent, answered questions on socio-demographic, lifestyle and health-related factors, completed a range of physical measures, and provided biological samples. DNA was extracted from the donated blood samples and was used to generate genotyping array data. The baseline information has been extended in several ways. For example, repeat assessments were conducted in subsets of the cohort every few years (Bycroft et al. 2018). Notably, thousands of UK Biobank participants underwent ophthalmic phenotyping including imaging of the central retina using OCT (>84 000 individuals) (Patel et al. 2016, Chua et al. 2019). A total of 67 664 individuals were imaged at the time of their baseline visit (Instance 0, “Initial assessment visit (2006–2010)”); this cohort was the focus of the primary analysis. A further 17 090 different participants were imaged for the first time during their first repeat assessment (Instance 1, “First repeat assessment visit (2012–2013)”); these were included in the replication study.
We performed quality control considering genetic and imaging parameters. First, to reduce the impact of population stratification and to increase the validity of the conducted genetic association studies, we focused on individuals within a genetically well-mixed, European-like subset of the UK Biobank. This was achieved by applying principal component analysis (PCA) to UK Biobank genotypic data using standard, previously-implemented methods (Currant et al. 2023). Additional participants were excluded as their OCT scans failed to meet a set of previously-described, rigorous quality control criteria (Patel et al. 2016, Currant et al. 2021, 2023). Finally, participants were removed on the basis of being recommended for exclusion from genetic studies by the UK Biobank or because they were related to third degree or more. The final dataset for the primary analysis included 31 135 study subjects (Supplementary Fig. S1). Similar criteria were used for the replication study with the exception of the imaging quality control parameters which were identical to those described by Zekavat et al. (2024).
2.2 Generation of thickness maps from OCT volume scans
All the UK Biobank volunteers that were included in our analysis were imaged using the 3D OCT-1000 Mark II device (Topcon, Japan). OCT imaging was carried out in a dark room without pupil dilation using the 3D 6 × 6 mm2 macular volume scan mode (128 horizontal B-scans in a 6 × 6 mm raster pattern). The right eye was imaged first (Patel et al. 2016, Chua et al. 2019). Our analysis focused on left eye images as we assumed that familiarity with the test would have led to scans that, on average, had higher overall quality. A total of 128 PNG images were generated from each tested eye with the dimensions of each PNG image being 650 × 512 × 1 grayscale pixels. After cropping the top (superior) and bottom (inferior) edge of the image area, PNG images with dimensions of 512 × 512 × 1 pixels were obtained.
The 128 images of each OCT scan were used to create a “thickness map”, i.e. a single image displaying the retinal thickness throughout the imaged area. To achieve this, segmentation of all the scans in the dataset was performed using a U-Net-based approach. The utilized U-Net method was first described in 2015 (Ronneberger et al. 2015) and involves a fully convolutional network that consists of a contracting path (that extracts features) and an expansive path (that localizes objects).
Initially, the inner- and outer-most limits of the retina (corresponding to the inner limiting membrane and the Bruch’s membrane, respectively) were manually identified in 100 randomly selected OCT images using the https://www.makesense.ai tool. The original images and the generated “ground truth” segmentation masks were subsequently utilized to train the U-Net. Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) was used to optimize the algorithm for training the network parameters, and training was performed for 50 epochs. The output of the U-Net consisted of segmented OCT images (analogous to the provided masks). These were used to calculate retinal thickness (i.e. the vertical distance between the top and bottom edge of the mask in each of the 512 points of the horizontal axis). The obtained measurements were compared to those acquired through the purpose-built Topcon Advanced Boundary Segmentation (TABS) software (the latter are available in the UK Biobank dataset). Good correlation was observed in retinae both with and without pathology, increasing confidence in the utilized approach (Supplementary Fig. S2). Finally, the thickness measurements from the 128 images (“slices”) that were obtained in each tested left eye were combined and used to generate a thickness map for each UK Biobank participant that met the inclusion criteria of this study (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Outline of the experimental approach. OCT images from the central retinae of 67 321 UK Biobank participants were analyzed. After applying quality control (QC) filters considering genetic information and image quality, a cohort of 31 135 study subjects was identified. Aiming to generate retinal “thickness maps” for these individuals, OCT image segmentation was performed using an artificial neural network (U-Net) approach. In brief, 100 OCT images were manually segmented and the generated segmentation masks (examples shown in yellow) were used as input to the U-Net which subsequently segmented all other images. This allowed conversion of the 128 cross-sectional images obtained from each tested eye into a single thickness map image. The thickness maps of the left eyes were then used as input to an autoencoder. This was trained utilizing 2500 training and 500 test images. The output of the embedding network was designed to be a 64-dimensional vector (i.e. 64 variables were obtained for each study subject). These 64 autoencoder-derived embeddings were then used for genetic association studies, correlation analyses, and predictive modeling.
2.3 Autoencoder set-up
An autoencoder was used for self-supervised feature extraction from the 31 135 left eye OCT-derived thickness maps. A conventional autoencoder architecture was utilized (Hinton and Salakhutdinov 2006, Michelucci 2022): the encoder network projected the input images to a low-dimensional space (“latent space”) with 64 variables (“embeddings”), and a function was used to try to reconstruct the original images from these 64 latent space representations. A mean squared error (MSE) loss function was employed to measure the deviation between reconstructed and input data (but otherwise the reconstructed images were not used in the primary analysis). It is noted that the autoencoder was trained end-to-end for 150 epochs utilizing 2500 training and 500 test images. We trialed different autoencoder layouts with bottleneck layers of the following sizes: 128, 64, 32, and 16. For 128 and 64, we obtained very similar reconstruction loss curves during training over 300 epochs. In contrast, for both 32 and 16, the image reconstruction loss could not be dropped below 0.006, suggesting that these models were unable to generalize as well as the larger bottleneck sizes (Supplementary Fig. S3). We then selected a bottleneck size of 64 since this was the smallest size with the best image reconstruction accuracy among the layouts that we tested.
To extract further information from the latent space, PCA (i.e. linear dimensionality reduction) was performed using the 64 embeddings as input; the first 25 principal components were then considered for further analyses.
2.4 Genome-wide association studies: primary analysis
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analyses of the autoencoder-derived embedded features (64 embeddings and 25 embedding-related principal components) were performed using an additive linear model implemented in REGENIE v3.1.1 (https://rgcgithub.github.io/regenie/) (Mbatchou et al. 2021). All embedded variables were inverse rank normalized prior to modeling with REGENIE to avoid any potential bias that could be introduced by outlier values (and in an attempt to prevent embeddings with a broader range of variation overshadowing those with a narrower range). The following quality control filters were applied on the imputed genotype data (UK Biobank data-field 22828) during the creation of the whole-genome regression model (REGENIE step 1): a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5%; Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test not exceeding P > 1 × 10−15; a genotyping rate above 99%; not present in a low-complexity region, a region of long-range linkage disequilibrium or a sex chromosome (Mbatchou et al. 2021). This resulted in up to 7 114 193 genotyped variants that were tested for association using a Firth logistic regression model (REGENIE step 2). Correction for the following covariates was undertaken: age at recruitment (data-field 21022), sex (data-field 31), height (data-field 50), weight (data-field 21002), refractive error (calculated as spherical error + 0.5 × cylindrical error; data-fields 5085 and 5086), and genetic principal components 1 to 20 (data-field 22009).
A degree of correlation was expected among autoencoder-derived embeddings so the summary statistics obtained from the GWAS analyses were used to perform a multi-trait meta-analysis. First, embeddings with a high genetic correlation (i.e. with Pearson correlation coefficient R > 0.9) were identified. Then, the MTAG v1.0.8 tool (https://github.com/JonJala/mtag) (Turley et al. 2018) was used to conduct a single meta-analysis for every individual inverse rank normalized embedding, leveraging the findings from correlated embedded features and producing an updated set of GWAS summary statistics for each of these 64 variables. Under certain assumptions, the generated estimates would be expected to be more precise than those obtained from the input GWAS (Turley et al. 2018).
To refine the obtained association signals, further analyses were performed using the GCTA-COJO tool (https://yanglab.westlake.edu.cn/software/gcta/#COJO) (Yang et al. 2012). These analyses were conducted utilizing linkage disequilibrium estimates from a reference sample (Currant et al. 2023) and summary statistics from: (i) the 64 embedding GWAS, (ii) the 25 embedding-related principal component GWAS, (iii) the 64 embedding MTAG-GWAS. Genetic variants in loci that were on different chromosomes or more than 10 Mb distant from each other were assumed to be uncorrelated.
Genetic changes in the main variant set were annotated using Ensembl (Cunningham et al. 2022), Open Targets (Ochoa et al. 2021), and GWAS Catalog (Sollis et al. 2023) data. To accurately summarize the strongest signals, the linkage disequilibrium metrics of the changes that were highlighted as lead variants by GCTA-COJO analysis and were within 1 Mb of one another were manually inspected using the LDlink tool (Myers et al. 2020).
2.5 Genome-wide association studies: replication
We sought to replicate the genetic associations detected in the primary analysis in a different set of OCT images. As the number of open resources that have sufficiently large human cohorts with combined genomic and OCT imaging data is small, we made use of the UK Biobank “Instance 1” left eye scans (data-field: 21017_1_0). This included images from 17 090 participants that were not part of the discovery/primary cohort and were not used for training of either the U-net segmentation or the autoencoder. It is noted that these additional OCT images were obtained at a different time (2012–2013) compared to the scans in the discovery/primary cohort (2006–2010). Due to the inconsistent capture of certain OCT-related metrics in the replication cohort scans, we used a different set of image QC exclusion criteria. Following the removal of poor quality and outlier images (using the approach described by Zekavat et al. (2024)), the replication cohort included 10 439 high-quality scans from unrelated UK Biobank participants of predominantly European-like genetic ancestries (as determined by PCA of genotypes). A replication GWAS was then performed using exactly the same parameters as in the discovery/primary study (outlined above). To gain insights into the extent to which the findings of the primary and the replication study were in agreement, we assessed the degree of correlation between the detected effect size estimates. The relevant beta–beta plots are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4.
2.6 Correlation and logistic regression analyses
Direct pairwise comparisons between the 64 embeddings were performed and the relevant Pearson correlation coefficients (R) were calculated. Genetic correlation was also estimated, again using Pearson correlation coefficients but this time utilizing the effect size estimates from across the significant associations for all 64 embeddings.
The correlation structure of the embedding space was further studied using hierarchical clustering of the distance matrix between the 64 embeddings. The canonical correlation values for every pairwise test and every embedding were subsequently calculated (Supplementary Fig. S5).
In addition to evaluating the relationship between pairs of the studied embedded features, correlation analyses were performed to look for links between each of these 64 features and four ophthalmic traits (Supplementary Fig. S6). Furthermore, a logistic regression approach was used to look for relationships between embeddings and a set of diseases (high-level ICD10 codes); only the 454 disease-related codes for which there were >1000 cases in the UK Biobank cohort were considered (when factoring in only data obtained after the date of OCT image acquisition (2012)). Age, sex, height, and weight were used as covariates and the statistical significance threshold was determined using Bonferroni correction.
2.7 Predictive modeling
Survival analysis was performed using penalized Cox proportional hazard regression; a mixture of L1 and L2 regularization was utilized (often referred to as the Cox elastic net). We focused on two main outcomes—glaucoma and cardiovascular disorders (essential hypertension, angina pectoris, and chronic ischemic heart disease). These included ICD10 codes that were highlighted as significant by the logistic regression analyses described in the previous section and were chosen as predicting them was deemed to be of clinical significance. Only diagnoses assigned after the date of OCT image acquisition were considered. To evaluate discriminative performance, we used Harrell’s C-index as a measure of the concordance between predicted and actual risk. The hyperparameter of L1/L2 penalization strength was set to 0.1, and 20 repetitions of five-fold cross-validation were used to evaluate model performance. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier estimator.
2.8 Ethics approval
The UK Biobank has received approval from the National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care and the National Health Service North West Centre for Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 11/NW/0382). This research was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under projects 49978, 53144, and 2112. All investigations were conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
3 Results
3.1 Obtaining autoencoder-derived phenotypes from OCT images
After applying standard genetic and OCT quality control filters (Patel et al. 2016, Currant et al. 2021), we defined a subset of the UK Biobank population that (i) can be considered genetically well-mixed (i.e. includes participants that were assigned by genotype PCA to a cluster with subjects of mostly European-like ancestries) and (ii) only contains individuals with high-quality OCT images (Supplementary Fig. S1). This cohort included 31 135 individuals and had a similar sex and age profile to the overall UK Biobank population (Currant et al. 2023). Most study subjects were female (54%) and self-identified as White British (91%). The mean age at OCT imaging was 56 years (standard deviation: 8 years).
Study subjects had an OCT “volume scan” of the central retina in each eye. Each volume scan contained 128 cross-sectional images and was generated using a horizontal raster scanning protocol. To extract thickness information and to compress these 128 images into a single retinal “thickness map” we utilized an ANN algorithm involving a U-Net architecture (Ronneberger et al. 2015) (Fig. 1; Materials and methods).
The 31 135 left eye retinal thickness maps that we generated were then used as input to an autoencoder. This was trained end-to-end for 150 epochs utilizing 2500 training and 500 test images. We explored various embedding dimensionalities and opted for a 64-dimensional vector (i.e. the latent space or “bottleneck layer” contained 64 features) (Fig. 1; Materials and methods). It has been previously shown that this autoencoder architecture can sufficiently represent datasets of similar complexity (Schroff et al. 2015, Song et al. 2015). A reconstruction error of 0.0037 was obtained (Supplementary Fig. S3).
The univariate distributions of the 64 embeddings are shown in Supplementary Fig. S7. Mostly unimodal or bimodal distributions were observed.
To create an alternative representation allowing information to be combined across different variables within the latent space, we used the 64 embeddings as input to a PCA. The first 25 principal components, representing 98.5% of the variance within the embeddings, were studied further and used for genetic association tests.
3.2 Genetic association studies of autoencoder-derived OCT phenotypes
To look for genetic factors associated with the obtained autoencoder-derived embedded features (i.e. the 64 embeddings and the first 25 embedding-related principal components), we performed common-variant GWAS. We used REGENIE (Mbatchou et al. 2021) and incorporated the following set of covariates into the model: age at recruitment, sex, height, weight, refractive error, and genetic principal components 1 to 20. Notably, each embedded feature was inverse rank normalized prior to performing genetic association testing. As we anticipated a degree of correlation between autoencoder-derived phenotypes, we also conducted a multi-trait meta-analysis using MTAG (Turley et al. 2018). This involved identifying genetically correlated embeddings and leveraging these relationships to obtain adjusted GWAS results for each of the 64 embeddings (Materials and methods).
Overall, 418 312 association signals from 17 022 common variants reached the genome-wide significance threshold (P < 5 × 10−8) (Table 1; Fig. 2). These merged into 239 lead loci following analysis with GCTA-COJO (conditional and joint multiple-variant analysis) (Yang et al. 2012) (Supplementary Table S1); 118 of these remained significant when a conservative/higher (“study-wide”) threshold was used to account for all the different association routes that were utilized (P < 3.2 × 10−10 following Bonferroni correction for 153 tests).
Table 1.
Comparative analyses of conventional and MTAG GWAS results (primary analysis)
| GWAS | MTAG | GWAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 64 embeddings | 64 embeddings | 25 PCAs | |
| Total genetic variants (P < 5 × 10−8) | 14 885 | 9 520 | 11 075 |
| Lead genetic variants (P < 5 × 10−8) | 443 | 99 | 157 |
GWAS, genome-wide association study; MTAG, multi-trait analysis of GWAS; PCA, principal component analysis.
Figure 2.
Genome-wide association studies of autoencoder-derived retinal OCT phenotypes (primary analysis). (A) Manhattan plot showing the P-values obtained from common-variant GWAS of embedded features (64 embeddings and first 25 embedding-related principal components). Signals that reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10−8) only in embedding variable analyses are highlighted with dark blue. Signals that reached genome-wide significance only in analyses of embedding-related principal components are highlighted with orange. Signals that reach genome-wide significance only in MTAG of embedding variables are highlighted with green. All other genome-wide significant signals are highlighted with cyan. (B) Venn diagram shows the overlap of lead signals among: conventional GWAS of the 64 embeddings (“encoder” group in light blue); MTAG of the 64 embeddings (“MTAG” group in light green) and conventional GWAS of the first 25 embedding-related principal components (“PCA” group in light orange). (C) Genomic inflation factor lamda (λ) for 64 embedding-, 64 MTAG- and 25 PCA-GWAS (median λGC = 1.016).
A replication study was conducted using OCT scans from 10 409 UK Biobank participants that were not included in the primary analysis. There was a high level of concordance in the findings of the two association studies (Supplementary Fig. S4). A total of 41 loci passed both the conservative study-wide threshold (P < 3.2 × 10−10) in the primary analysis and a Bonferroni correction based threshold (P < 8.5 × 10−5 following Bonferroni correction for 118 tests) in the replication study. Most of these loci encompass variants previously linked to retinal layer thickness parameters (including around LINC00461, TSPAN10, and COBL) (Gao et al. 2019, Currant et al. 2021, 2023) while a subset of them has also been linked to monogenic retinal disorders [including RDH5 (retinal dystrophy), TYR (albinism), and GNB3 (congenital stationary night blindness)] (Table 2; Supplementary Table S1).
Table 2.
Summary of the 10 top-ranking loci associated with autoencoder-derived retinal OCT phenotypes.a
| Top-ranking common variant in locus | Chr: position (grch37) | Key gene(s) | Allele freq (ukb) | Minimum P-value | Embeddings with significant result for the locus | Selected previous association(s) with the detected significant variants in the locus GWAS catalog; (Panelapp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs17421627 | 5:87847586 | LINC00461 | 0.07 | 4 × 10−68 | 83 | Retinal thickness measurements, retinal vascular fractal density |
| rs62075722 | 17:79611271 | TSPAN10/NPLOC4/PDE6G | 0.65 | 1 × 10−62 | 83 | Retinal thickness measurements, refractive error, eye color, hair color |
| rs3138142 | 12:56115585 | RDH5/CD63 | 0.24 | 1 × 10−56 | 91 | Retinal thickness measurements, refractive error, retinal vascular fractal density; (retinal dystrophy) |
| rs13171669 | 5:148601243 | AFAP1L1/ABLIM3 | 0.43 | 1 × 10−36 | 84 | Retinal thickness measurements, height, waste-hip ratio, lung function |
| rs12719025 | 7:51100190 | COBL | 0.46 | 1 × 10−36 | 113 | Retinal thickness measurements, refractive error |
| rs33912345 | 14:60976537 | SIX6/C14orf39/PPPM1A | 0.61 | 4 × 10−28 | 6 | Retinal thickness measurements, glaucoma, height; (ocular malformations) |
| rs887595 | 14:74666641 | VSX2/LIN52 | 0.82 | 6 × 10−27 | 85 | Retinal thickness measurements; (microphthalmia) |
| rs17279437 | 3:45814094 | SLC6A20 | 0.11 | 8 × 10−24 | 33 | Retinal thickness measurements, macular telangiectasia, brain measurements, metabolite measurements; (hyperglicynuria) |
| rs1042602 | 11:88911696 | TYR | 0.37 | 5 × 10−22 | 29 | Retinal thickness measurements, brain measurements, skin color, hair color; (albinism) |
| rs62175360 | 2:218520035 | DIRC3 | 0.07 | 9 × 10−22 | 21 | Retinal thickness measurements, optic disc measurements, brain measurements, metabolite measurements, height, cancer |
The above loci were identified after selecting fine mapped variants that had a P < 3.2 × 10−10 in the primary analysis and a P < 5 × 10−8 in the replication study. Manual inspection of linkage disequilibrium patterns was subsequently performed to further refine the signals and the 10 loci with the lowest P-value were selected. UKB, UK Biobank.
For each of the 118 lead loci that were found to be significant in the primary analysis (P < 3.2 × 10−10), we compared the retinal thickness maps of heterozygotes for the key variant to that of homozygotes. Interestingly, some genetic alterations appeared to have recessive effects (e.g. rs62075722) while others appeared to have dominant effects (e.g. rs11051131); topographical variation was also noted (Supplementary File S1).
Our primary analysis identified notable associations between multiple embeddings and a locus encompassing the MAPT (microtubule-associated protein tau) gene. The detected signal appears to be driven by a common ancestral genomic inversion at 17q21.31 (Fig. 3A) (Stefansson et al. 2005, Espinosa et al. 2023). Using the pattern of alternative alleles across this genomic region, we were able to classify 487 409 UK Biobank participants as either reference:reference (no inversion), reference:inversion (heterozygous inversion), or inversion:inversion (homozygous inversion) (Fig. 3B). In accordance with previous studies (Steinberg et al. 2012), we found that the 17q21.31 inversion is common in individuals of European-like ancestries, rare in individuals of African-like ancestries and very rare in Asian-like populations (allele frequency of 0.22, 0.01, and 0.004 respectively). When we compared the retinal thickness profiles between study subjects that carry heterozygous and homozygous inversion genotypes, we found that the 17q21.31 inversion appears to affect retinal thickness in an apparently recessive pattern (Fig. 3C). We then performed a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) of the 17q21.31 inversion using disease-related ICD10 codes. After Bonferroni correction, we found six statistically significant signals for ICD10 codes, including one for Parkinson disease (G20; P = 5.3 × 10−7; β −0.61) (Fig. 3D). When we re-run this analysis, this time under a recessive model, we observed a marginal increase in signal strength (median increase of 0.74 on −log10P) and found statistically significant signal for one additional ICD10 code: E66 (obesity).
Figure 3.
Analysis of the chromosome 17q21.31 inversion association signal. (A) Genetic association study result highlighting a group of 2,936 common variants that passed the genome-wide significance threshold for MTAG of embedding no.21. The genetic alterations are colored based on their linkage disequilibrium (LD; R2) relationship to the inversion genotype. (B) Classification of the inversion status based on the pattern of alternative alleles across the 17q21.31 region for 487 409 UK Biobank participants. (C) Left eye retinal thickness maps showing the difference in retinal structure between individuals with different inversion-related alleles. Left: mean depth (thickness) representation for reference:reference (no inversion) alleles. Middle: difference between image mean for reference:reference and image mean for reference:inversion (heterozygous inversion) genotypes. Right: difference between image mean for reference:reference and image mean for inversion:inversion (homozygous inversion) genotypes. A paracentral area of differential retinal thickness can only be visualized in the reference-to-homozygous difference map (in keeping with a recessive effect). (D) Phenome-wide associations for the inversion genotype against 454 ICD10 disease codes for which there were >1000 cases in the UK Biobank cohort (when only data obtained after the date of OCT image acquisition were considered); six codes (M16, G20, I84, M20, K60, J84) remained significant after Bonferroni correction; −log10P-values are shown grouped by high-level ICD10 category.
3.3 Investigating how autoencoder-derived OCT phenotypes are related between them and with other retinal traits and diseases
To gain insights into the nature of the autoencoder-derived embedded features, we performed correlation and logistic regression analyses. First, we examined the direct pairwise correlation between the 64 embeddings; a few prominent clusters were noted (Fig.4A —upper triangle; Supplementary Fig. S5). Then we looked at genetic correlation (Fig. 4A—lower triangle); a notable observation was the discrepancy between the degree of direct and genetic correlation for many groups of embeddings. This suggests that although the latent space is complex and includes (linearly) correlated features, the different embeddings are able to represent discrete factors related to different aspects of retinal morphology genetics.
Figure 4.
Correlation and logistic regression analyses of autoencoder-derived retinal OCT phenotypes. (A) Direct (upper triangle) and genetic (lower triangle) correlations among embedded features (64 embeddings). The two correlation matrices are displayed using a heatmap where rows and columns were ordered by the distances obtained via hierarchical clustering (on the embedding value correlation matrix only). (B) Logistic regression analysis of the 64 embeddings against high-level ICD10 disease codes; only data obtained after the date of OCT image acquisition were included and only ICD10 codes for which there were >1000 cases in the UK Biobank cohort were considered; sex, age, height, and weight were factored in as covariates. A total of eight signals for five distinct ICD10 codes remained significant after Bonferroni correction: E11 (3), G40 (1), H40 (2), I25 (1), F10 (1). (C) Graph showing which specific embeddings were significantly correlated with the lead signals of the logistic regression analysis, i.e. non-insulin-dependent diabetes (E11), epilepsy (G40), glaucoma (H40) and chronic ischemic heart disease (I25); −log10P-values are shown for all 64 embedded features. (D) Left eye retinal thickness maps showing the difference in retinal structure between UK Biobank participants who were diagnosed with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (E11; first row), epilepsy (G40; second row), glaucoma (H40; third row), and chronic ischemic heart disease (I25; fourth row) after having an OCT scan against the groups of individuals that have not been assigned the relevant ICD10 codes.
We subsequently investigated the relationship between the 64 embedded features and a set of traits and disease codes (ICD10) that are available in the UK Biobank dataset. Unsurprisingly, most embeddings correlated with retinal layer thickness parameters (Supplementary Fig. S6). We then used a logistic regression approach (with sex, age, height, and weight as covariates) and detected significant associations between specific embeddings and the following conditions: non-insulin-dependent diabetes, epilepsy, glaucoma, and chronic ischemic heart disease (Fig. 4B). Two of these lead signals (epilespy and chronic ischemic heart disease) are associated very specifically to only one embedding each (embedding no. 1 and no. 26, respectively). In contrast, glaucoma is associated with two different embeddings (no. 39 and no. 47) and diabetes to three sequential embeddings (nos. 36–38) (Fig. 4C). Reassuringly, GWAS analysis of embeddings no. 36–38 revealed statistically significant signals linked to ADCY5 (Supplementary Table S1), a gene that influences glucose metabolism and has been previously linked to non-insulin-dependent diabetes by multiple association studies (Roman et al. 2017).
To understand which aspects of retinal morphology drove the association between the embedded features and the lead disease codes (non-insulin-dependent diabetes, epilepsy, glaucoma, and chronic ischemic heart disease), we inspected a set of retinal thickness difference maps. These compared retinal thickness in UK Biobank participants that had been assigned the relevant ICD10 code (after OCT imaging) to those that have not (Fig. 4D). In keeping with previous observations: (i) the main areas of difference for diabetes were the paracentral region and the areas temporal to the optic disc (corresponding to the major retinal vessels) (Li et al. 2021); (ii) the main area of difference for glaucoma corresponded to what is described in the glaucoma literature as the “macular vulnerability zone” (Hood 2017).
3.4 Using autoencoder-derived OCT phenotypes to gain insights into disease risk
We investigated if autoencoder-derived embedded features from an individual’s OCT scan can help predict the occurrence of certain diseases, including glaucoma and cardiovascular disorders. We used survival analysis (Cox proportional hazard regression) and found significant links between specific embeddings and the occurrence of disease (after the OCT scan date) (Fig. 5A). High-risk cohorts identified based on the embedded features showed a higher chance of being affected by glaucoma or cardiovascular conditions compared to the sex-stratified baseline rate of disease occurrence. In other words, the embedded features could help identify high-risk cohorts (Fig. 5B). It is highlighted that a few embeddings appear to be linked to multiple diseases (e.g. no. 28), while others have no effect on any disease or are specific to single disease codes (e.g. embedding no. 18 for chronic ischemic heart disease). A notable observation is the link between multiple embeddings and essential hypertension. This is often in the presence of signals from other cardiovascular disease codes, suggesting that changes in blood pressure can lead to alterations in OCT-evaluated retinal structure which may in turn be a marker for the development of cardiovascular complications (Fig. 5C).
Figure 5.
Survival analysis investigating the contribution of embedded features upon the time-to-diagnosis for four ICD10 disease codes. (A) Concordance index evaluating the embedding-incorporating model’s ability to discriminate sex-stratified disease occurrence; the distribution across 20 repetitions of five-fold cross-validation is shown (n = 100 for each box plot); all box plots demarcate quartiles and median values, while whiskers extend to 1.5× of the interquartile range. (B) Kaplan–Meier plots showing sex-stratified risk of disease occurrence for the overall population as well as for high-risk cohorts determined by the embedding-incorporating model (top 25% based on Cox regression). (C) Graph highlighting which embedded features have a significant relationship with the selected diseases in male and female cohorts; −log10 hazard ratios are shown.
4 Discussion
Phenotypes are abstract entities that can be thought of as simplified maps carved from higher dimension spaces (Cortese et al. 2021). These maps are generally influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental, and stochastic factors. Discovering phenotypes that represent distinct biological pathways and/or have pragmatic medical significance is of particular interest (Dahl and Zaitlen 2020). Here, we show that a computational, autoencoder-based approach can be used to efficiently extract informative phenotypes from retinal OCT images.
Analysis of the genetic basis of autoencoder-derived embedded features revealed 118 statistically significant (P < 3.2 × 10−10) association signals. Notably, three recent studies that used a similar analytical approach but focused on different imaging modalities—fundus photography (Kirchler et al. 2022, Xie et al. 2024) and cardiac magnetic resonance images (Bonazzola et al. 2024)—identified a slightly smaller number of genetic associations (Supplementary Table S2). While many of the loci detected here have prior links to retinal phenotypes, at least 20 of them have no such prior association. One example is the locus around LPHN2/ADGRL2, a gene encoding a synaptic adhesion molecule implicated in guiding neural circuit connectivity (Donohue et al. 2021) (lead marker: rs1492258; association with seven autoencoder-derived embedded features; minimum P 1.4 × 10−15). Although this gene is expressed in the retina, especially in the bipolar cells (Karlsson et al. 2021), it has not been previously associated with a retinal phenotype.
Reassuringly, there was a significant overlap between the findings of the present study and the results of previous analyses that investigated the genetic architecture of traditional OCT-derived retinal phenotypes. These include three UK Biobank studies: (i) one that looked at macular (i.e. total central retinal) thickness and reported 139 loci (Gao et al. 2019), and (ii) two from our group that investigated OCT-derived measurements of inner and outer retinal layers, and reported 46 and 111 loci, respectively (Currant et al. 2021, 2023). Overall, 36% (98/273) of the combined lead loci from these studies also reached genome-wide significance in the present analysis (58%, 33%, and 41% for Currant et al. 2021, 2023 and Gao et al. 2019, respectively). Interestingly, the two signals with the highest statistical significance in the macular thickness GWAS conducted by Gao et al. (2019) were also the most significant hits in this study (Fig. 2). The marker with the highest statistical significance was within the LINC00461 locus. LINC00461 is a long noncoding RNA that is the primary transcript of miR-9-2. LINC00461 is highly expressed in neural stem cells and a decrease in its expression has been shown to alter the timing of retinal neurogenesis (Thomas et al. 2022). The locus with the second highest statistical significance encompassed the TSPAN10 gene. In the eye, TSPAN10 is predominantly expressed in melanin-containing cells (retinal pigment epithelia (RPE) and uveal melanocytes), and the corresponding protein is thought to have a role in regulating retinal cell fate and development (Dornier et al. 2012, Haining et al. 2012, Orozco et al. 2020). Further functional genomic analyses of these two key loci are expected to provide important insights into developmental processes shaping human retinal morphology.
An intriguing association that we detected was that between certain autoencoder-derived retinal phenotypes and a common 17q21.31 inversion encompassing the MAPT gene. MAPT is primarily expressed in brain neurons, and genetic alterations impacting the MAPT locus have been linked to several neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism (Wang and Mandelkow 2016, Shi et al. 2021). Recently, inner retinal layer thickness parameters and glaucoma have been added to the growing list of phenotypes associated with the MAPT locus (Gharahkhani et al. 2021, Diaz-Torres et al. 2023). Further work is required to pinpoint which (and how many) genes within the MAPT region are causally associated with retinal and brain phenotypes (Diaz-Torres et al. 2023). More broadly, the extent to which the overlap between neurodegenerative disorders, retinal morphology, and glaucoma reflects pleiotropy rather than causal relationships remains to be determined. Of note, causal genetic effects in both directions have been previously suggested between retinal imaging traits and Alzheimer disease (Zhao et al. 2024) while little support has been found for a causal relationship between glaucoma and Alzheimer disease (Budu-Aggrey et al. 2020).
Deep learning approaches have been shown to be able to detect imaging patterns that are not amenable to human identification and which can assist with prediction tasks (Patel et al. 2024, Radhakrishnan et al. 2023, Zhou et al. 2024, Yun et al. 2024). For example, neural networks can predict sex and age with good accuracy from retinal OCT images (Chueh et al. 2022, Le Goallec et al. 2022), whereas human experts find these tasks impossible. Here, we investigated if autoencoders can identify OCT parameters that can be used to predict health outcomes (glaucoma and cardiovascular disease). Although the overall predictive ability of the generated models was moderate, the autoencoder-derived features were shown to enhance risk stratification. These observations suggest that it is not inconceivable that purpose-built autoencoders will play a role in improving the efficiency of medical screening programs in the future.
This study has a number of limitations. First, the autoencoder input was retinal thickness maps generated using a U-Net approach which made our framework semi-automated (as a small amount of manual labeling was required). Using three-dimensional autoencoders to extract features directly from OCT volume scans could fully automate the pipeline, minimizing any subjective aspects and reducing the burden of data curation (Diaz-Pinto et al. 2022). Second, an empirical approach was used to determine the number of embedded features that were analyzed; this was guided by observations regarding the information-content and variance captured. Third, we only performed common-variant genetic association analyses of the obtained embedded features. The increasing availability of genome sequencing data in UK Biobank participants will allow us to more comprehensively look for genetic associations, including with rare variants and with copy number alterations in the future. Third, the fact that relationships were detected between embeddings and certain health outcomes does not necessarily imply causation. The main aim of this study was to assess if autoencoders can be utilized to produce biologically and clinically relevant phenotypes. In-depth confounder adjustment and causal inference studies were therefore not performed. Furthermore, the predictive models described here have a proof-of-concept nature and are not intended for implementation (especially as the data used for training and evaluation were highly homogeneous and focused on individuals with predominantly European-like ancestries).
In summary, this study proposes a framework for retinal phenotyping based on a self-supervised deep learning approach. Our findings highlight that autoencoder-based techniques can be used to extract knowledge about the genetic factors determining retinal morphology. The outlined approach is flexible and can be adapted and extended to other organs and imaging modalities.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the help of Thomas Julian and David Green from the University of Manchester. We also acknowledge the contribution of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. Members of this consortium include: Naomi Allen, Tariq Aslam, Denize Atan, Sarah Barman, Jenny Barrett, Paul Bishop, Graeme Black, Tasanee Braithwaite, Roxana Carare, Usha Chakravarthy, Michelle Chan, Sharon Chua, Alexander Day, Parul Desai, Bal Dhillon, Andrew Dick, Alexander Doney, Cathy Egan, Sarah Ennis, Paul Foster, Marcus Fruttiger, John Gallacher, David Garway-Heath, Jane Gibson, Jeremy Guggenheim, Chris Hammond, Alison Hardcastle, Simon Harding, Ruth Hogg, Pirro Hysi, Pearse Keane, Peng Tee Khaw, Anthony Khawaja, Gerassimos Lascaratos, Thomas Littlejohns, Andrew Lotery, Robert Luben, Phil Luthert, Tom Macgillivray, Sarah Mackie, Savita Madhusudhan, Bernadette Mcguinness, Gareth Mckay, Martin Mckibbin, Tony Moore, James Morgan, Eoin O’Sullivan, Richard Oram, Chris Owen, Praveen Patel, Euan Paterson, Tunde Peto, Axel Petzold, Nikolas Pontikos, Jugnoo Rahi, Alicja Rudnicka, Naveed Sattar, Jay Self, Panagiotis Sergouniotis, Sobha Sivaprasad, David Steel, Irene Stratton, Nicholas Strouthidis, Cathie Sudlow, Zihan Sun, Robyn Tapp, Dhanes Thomas, Emanuele Trucco, Adnan Tufail, Ananth Viswanathan, Veronique Vitart, Mike Weedon, Cathy Williams, Katie Williams, Jayne Woodside, Max Yates, Jennifer Yip, and Yalin Zheng.
Contributor Information
Panagiotis I Sergouniotis, European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom; Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom.
Adam Diakite, European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Kumar Gaurav, European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Ewan Birney, European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Tomas Fitzgerald, European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium:
Naomi Allen, Tariq Aslam, Denize Atan, Sarah Barman, Jenny Barrett, Paul Bishop, Graeme Black, Tasanee Braithwaite, Roxana Carare, Usha Chakravarthy, Michelle Chan, Sharon Chua, Alexander Day, Parul Desai, Bal Dhillon, Andrew Dick, Alexander Doney, Cathy Egan, Sarah Ennis, Paul Foster, Marcus Fruttiger, John Gallacher, David Garway-Heath, Jane Gibson, Jeremy Guggenheim, Chris Hammond, Alison Hardcastle, Simon Harding, Ruth Hogg, Pirro Hysi, Pearse Keane, Peng Tee Khaw, Anthony Khawaja, Gerassimos Lascaratos, Thomas Littlejohns, Andrew Lotery, Robert Luben, Phil Luthert, Tom Macgillivray, Sarah Mackie, Savita Madhusudhan, Bernadette Mcguinness, Gareth Mckay, Martin Mckibbin, Tony Moore, James Morgan, Eoin O’Sullivan, Richard Oram, Chris Owen, Praveen Patel, Euan Paterson, Tunde Peto, Axel Petzold, Nikolas Pontikos, Jugnoo Rahi, Alicja Rudnicka, Naveed Sattar, Jay Self, Panagiotis Sergouniotis, Sobha Sivaprasad, David Steel, Irene Stratton, Nicholas Strouthidis, Cathie Sudlow, Zihan Sun, Robyn Tapp, Dhanes Thomas, Emanuele Trucco, Adnan Tufail, Ananth Viswanathan, Veronique Vitart, Mike Weedon, Cathy Williams, Katie Williams, Jayne Woodside, Max Yates, Jennifer Yip, and Yalin Zheng
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Conflict of interest: E.B. is a paid consultant and equity holder of Oxford Nanopore, a paid consultant to Dovetail, and a non-executive director of Genomics England, a limited company wholly owned by the UK Department of Health and Social Care. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
This work has been supported by the Wellcome Trust (224643/Z/21/Z, Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship to P.I.S.), the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Lecturer Programme (CL-2017-06-001 to P.I.S.), and the EMBL European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) (A.D., K.G., E.B., and T.F.). This research was co-funded by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium is supported by funding from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, the Alcon Foundation and the Desmond Foundation.
Data availability
The UK Biobank dataset is available under restricted access through a procedure described at http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.
References
- Bonazzola R, Ferrante E, Ravikumar N. et al. Unsupervised ensemble-based phenotyping enhances discoverability of genes related to left-ventricular morphology. Nat Mach Intell 2024;6:291–306. 10.1038/s42256-024-00801-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouma BE, de Boer JF, Huang D. et al. Optical coherence tomography. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2022;2:79. 10.1038/s43586-022-00162-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Budu-Aggrey A, Hysi P, Kehoe PG et al. The relationship between open angle glaucoma, optic disc morphology and Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study. bioRxiv 2020; 10.1101/2020.08.30.20184846, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 2018;562:203–9. 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chua SYL, Thomas D, Allen N. et al. ; UK Biobank Eye & Vision Consortium. Cohort profile: design and methods in the Eye and Vision Consortium of UK Biobank. BMJ Open 2019;9:e025077. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chueh KM, Hsieh YT, Chen HH. et al. Identification of sex and age from macular optical coherence tomography and feature analysis using deep learning. Am J Ophthalmol 2022;235:221–8. 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cortese A, Yamamoto A, Hashemzadeh M. et al. Value signals guide abstraction during learning. Elife 2021;10:e68943. 10.7554/eLife.68943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham F, Allen JE, Allen J. et al. Ensembl 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D988–D995. 10.1093/nar/gkab1049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Currant H, Fitzgerald TW, Patel PJ. et al. ; UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. Sub-cellular level resolution of common genetic variation in the photoreceptor layer identifies continuum between rare disease and common variation. PLoS Genet 2023;19:e1010587. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Currant H, Hysi P, Fitzgerald TW. et al. ; International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium. Genetic variation affects morphological retinal phenotypes extracted from UK Biobank optical coherence tomography images. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009497. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahl A, Zaitlen N.. Genetic influences on disease subtypes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2020;21:413–35. 10.1146/annurev-genom-120319-095026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Fauw J, Ledsam JR, Romera-Paredes B. et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med 2018;24:1342–50. 10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz-Pinto A, Ravikumar N, Attar R. et al. Predicting myocardial infarction through retinal scans and minimal personal information. Nat Mach Intell 2022;4:55–61. 10.1038/s42256-021-00427-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz-Torres S, He W, Thorp J. et al. ; IGGC International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium. Disentangling the genetic overlap and causal relationships between primary open-angle glaucoma, brain morphology and four major neurodegenerative disorders. EBioMedicine 2023;92:104615. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donohue JD, Amidon RF, Murphy TR. et al. Parahippocampal latrophilin-2 (ADGRL2) expression controls topographical presubiculum to entorhinal cortex circuit connectivity. Cell Rep 2021;37:110031. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dornier E, Coumailleau F, Ottavi JF. et al. TspanC8 tetraspanins regulate ADAM10/Kuzbanian trafficking and promote Notch activation in flies and mammals. J Cell Biol 2012;199:481–96. 10.1083/jcb.201201133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elliott LT, Sharp K, Alfaro-Almagro F. et al. Genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank. Nature 2018;562:210–6. 10.1038/s41586-018-0571-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinosa I, Alfonso-Sánchez MA, Gómez-Pérez L. et al. Neolithic expansion and the 17q21.31 inversion in Iberia: an evolutionary approach to H2 haplotype distribution in the Near East and Europe. Mol Genet Genomics 2023;298:153–60. 10.1007/s00438-022-01969-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao XR, Huang H, Kim H. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 139 loci associated with macular thickness in the UK Biobank cohort. Hum Mol Genet 2019;28:1162–72. 10.1093/hmg/ddy422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gharahkhani P, Jorgenson E, Hysi P. et al. ; 23 and Me Research Team. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat Commun 2021;12:1258. 10.1038/s41467-020-20851-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gong W, Bai S, Zheng Y-Q. et al. Supervised phenotype discovery from multimodal brain imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2022;42:834–49. 10.1109/TMI.2022.3218720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haining EJ, Yang J, Bailey RL. et al. The TspanC8 subgroup of tetraspanins interacts with a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) and regulates its maturation and cell surface expression. J Biol Chem 2012;287:39753–65. 10.1074/jbc.M112.416503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasson U, Nastase SA, Goldstein A. et al. Direct fit to nature: an evolutionary perspective on biological and artificial neural networks. Neuron 2020;105:416–34. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinton G. Deep learning—a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 2018;320:1101–2. 10.1001/jama.2018.11100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR.. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 2006;313:504–7. 10.1126/science.1127647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hood DC. Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: an approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT). Prog Retin Eye Res 2017;57:46–75. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlsson M, Zhang C, Méar L. et al. A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci Adv 2021;7:eabh2169. 10.1126/sciadv.abh2169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keenan TDL, Clemons TE, Domalpally A. et al. Retinal specialist versus artificial intelligence detection of retinal fluid from OCT: age-related eye disease study 2: 10-year follow-on study. Ophthalmology 2021;128:100–9. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirchler M, Konigorski S, Norden M. et al. transferGWAS: GWAS of images using deep transfer learning. Bioinformatics 2022;38:3621–8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Goallec A, Diaei A, Collin S et al. Deep learning of fundus and optical coherence tomography images enables identification of diverse genetic and environmental factors associated with eye aging. bioRxiv, 10.1101/2021.06.24.21259471, 2022, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI]
- LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G.. Deep learning. Nature 2015;521:436–44. 10.1038/nature14539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Yu X, Zheng B. et al. Early neurovascular changes in the retina in preclinical diabetic retinopathy and its relation with blood glucose. BMC Ophthalmol 2021;21:220. 10.1186/s12886-021-01975-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mbatchou J, Barnard L, Backman J. et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat Genet 2021;53:1097–103. 10.1038/s41588-021-00870-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michelucci U. An introduction to autoencoders. arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2201.03898, 2022, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI]
- Myers TA, Chanock SJ, Machiela MJ.. LDlinkR: an R package for rapidly calculating linkage disequilibrium statistics in diverse populations. Front Genet 2020;11:157. 10.3389/fgene.2020.00157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ochoa D, Hercules A, Carmona M. et al. Open targets platform: supporting systematic drug-target identification and prioritisation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;49:D1302–D1310. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oren O, Gersh BJ, Bhatt DL.. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: switching from radiographic pathological data to clinically meaningful endpoints. Lancet Digit Health 2020;2:e486–e488. 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30160-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orozco LD, Chen H-H, Cox C. et al. Integration of eQTL and a single-cell atlas in the human eye identifies causal genes for age-related macular degeneration. Cell Rep 2020;30:1246–59.e6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel K, Xie Z, Yuan H. et al. Unsupervised deep representation learning enables phenotype discovery for genetic association studies of brain imaging. Commun Biol 2024;7:414. 10.1038/s42003-024-06096-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel PJ, Foster PJ, Grossi CM. et al. ; UK Biobank Eyes and Vision Consortium. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging in 67 321 adults: associations with macular thickness in the UK Biobank study. Ophthalmology 2016;123:829–40. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radhakrishnan A, Friedman SF, Khurshid S. et al. Cross-modal autoencoder framework learns holistic representations of cardiovascular state. Nat Commun 2023;14:2436. 10.1038/s41467-023-38125-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roman TS, Cannon ME, Vadlamudi S. et al. ; National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencing Center (NISC) Comparative Sequencing Program. A type 2 diabetes-associated functional regulatory variant in a pancreatic islet enhancer at the ADCY5 locus. Diabetes 2017;66:2521–30. 10.2337/db17-0464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597, 2015, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI]
- Schroff F, Kalenichenko D, Philbin J. FaceNet: a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.1503.03832, 2015, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI]
- Sheffield VC, Stone EM.. Genomics and the eye. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1932–42. 10.1056/NEJMra1012354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Y, Zhang W, Yang Y. et al. Structure-based classification of tauopathies. Nature 2021;598:359–63. 10.1038/s41586-021-03911-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sollis E, Mosaku A, Abid A. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;51:D977–85. 10.1093/nar/gkac1010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song HO, Xiang Y, Jegelka S et al. Deep metric learning via lifted structured feature embedding. arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.1511.06452, 2015, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI]
- Stefansson H, Helgason A, Thorleifsson G. et al. A common inversion under selection in Europeans. Nat Genet 2005;37:129–37. 10.1038/ng1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinberg KM, Antonacci F, Sudmant PH. et al. Structural diversity and African origin of the 17q21.31 inversion polymorphism. Nat Genet 2012;44:872–80. 10.1038/ng.2335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas ED, Timms AE, Giles S. et al. Cell-specific cis-regulatory elements and mechanisms of non-coding genetic disease in human retina and retinal organoids. Dev Cell 2022;57:820–36.e6. 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.02.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, Social Science Genetic Association Consortium et al. Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat Genet 2018;50:229–37. 10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Mandelkow E.. Tau in physiology and pathology. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016;17:5–21. 10.1038/nrn.2015.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie Z, Zhang T, Kim S. et al. iGWAS: image-based genome-wide association of self-supervised deep phenotyping of retina fundus images. PLoS Genet 2024;20:e1011273. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J, FeRReira T, Morris AP. et al. ; DIAbetes Genetics Replication and Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat Genet 2012;44:369–75. S1–3, 10.1038/ng.2213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yim J, Chopra R, Spitz T. et al. Predicting conversion to wet age-related macular degeneration using deep learning. Nat Med 2020;26:892–9. 10.1038/s41591-020-0867-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yun T, Cosentino J, Behsaz B. et al. Unsupervised representation learning on high-dimensional clinical data improves genomic discovery and prediction. Nat Genet 2024;56:1604–13. 10.1038/s41588-024-01831-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zekavat SM, Jorshery SD, Rauscher FG et al. Phenome- and genome-wide analyses of retinal optical coherence tomography images identify links between ocular and systemic health. Sci Transl Med 2024;16:eadg4517. 10.1126/scitranslmed.adg4517 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Zhao B, Li Y, Fan Z et al. Eye-brain connections revealed by multimodal retinal and brain imaging genetics. Nat Commun 2024;15:6064. 10.1038/s41467-024-50309-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Zhou Y, Cosentino J, Yun T et al. Utilizing multimodal AI to improve genetic analyses of cardiovascular traits. medRxiv, 10.1101/2024.03.19.24304547, 2024, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The UK Biobank dataset is available under restricted access through a procedure described at http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.





