Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1993 Jan;460:201–219. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019467

Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation.

P J Maccabee 1, V E Amassian 1, L P Eberle 1, R Q Cracco 1
PMCID: PMC1175209  PMID: 8487192

Abstract

1. According to classical cable theory, a magnetic coil (MC) should excite a linear nerve fibre in a homogeneous medium at the negative-going first spatial derivative of the induced electric field. This prediction was tested by MC stimulation of mammalian phrenic and amphibian sciatic nerve and branches in vitro, immersed in Ringer solution within a trough, and identifying the sites of excitation by recording responses of similar latency to local electrical stimulation. Subsequently, the identified sites of excitation were compared with measurements of the induced electric field and its calculated first spatial derivative. A special hardware device was used to selectively reverse MC current direction and to generate predominantly monophasic- or polyphasic-induced pulse profiles whose initial phases were identical in polarity, shape and amplitude. When using the amphibian nerve preparation, a complication was excitation at low threshold points related to cut branches. 2. Reversal of monophasic current resulted in latency shifts corresponding approximately to the distance between induced cathode and anode. The location of each site of excitation was at, or very near, the negative-going first spatial derivative peaks of the induced electric field measured parallel to the straight nerve. Significantly, excitation of the nerve did not occur at the peak of the induced electric field above the centre of the 'figure of eight' MC junction. 3. A polyphasic pulse excited the nerve at both sites, by the negative-going first phase at one location, and approximately 150 microseconds later, by the reversed negative-going second phase at the other location. Polyphasic and monophasic pulses elicited responses with similar latency when the induced current flowed towards the recording electrode. 4. Straddling a nerve with non-coding solid lucite cylinders created a localized spatial narrowing and increase in the induced electric field, resulting in a lowered threshold of excitation. The corresponding closer spacing between first spatial derivative peaks was exhibited by a significant reduction in latency shift when MC current direction was reversed. 5. When a nerve is bent and the induced current is directed along the nerve towards the bend, the threshold of excitation is reduced there. Increasing the angle of the bend from 0 deg to more than 90 deg graded the decrease in threshold. 6. In a straight nerve the threshold was lowest when current was directed towards the cut end.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
201

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman K. W., Plonsey R. Analysis of excitable cell activation: relative effects of external electrical stimuli. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990 Nov;28(6):574–580. doi: 10.1007/BF02442610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amassian V. E., Cracco R. Q., Maccabee P. J., Cracco J. B., Rudell A., Eberle L. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;74(6):458–462. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amassian V. E., Maccabee P. J., Cracco R. Q. Focal stimulation of human peripheral nerve with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Exp Neurol. 1989 Mar;103(3):282–289. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(89)90052-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basser P. J., Roth B. J. Stimulation of a myelinated nerve axon by electromagnetic induction. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991 May;29(3):261–268. doi: 10.1007/BF02446708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claus D., Murray N. M., Spitzer A., Flügel D. The influence of stimulus type on the magnetic excitation of nerve structures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):342–349. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90112-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen D., Cuffin B. N. Developing a more focal magnetic stimulator. Part I: Some basic principles. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jan;8(1):102–111. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199101000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen L. G., Roth B. J., Nilsson J., Dang N., Panizza M., Bandinelli S., Friauf W., Hallett M. Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):350–357. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maccabee P. J., Amassian V. E., Cracco R. Q., Cadwell J. A. An analysis of peripheral motor nerve stimulation in humans using the magnetic coil. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Dec;70(6):524–533. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maccabee P. J., Amassian V. E., Eberle L. P., Rudell A. P., Cracco R. Q., Lai K. S., Somasundarum M. Measurement of the electric field induced into inhomogeneous volume conductors by magnetic coils: application to human spinal neurogeometry. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;81(3):224–237. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90076-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maccabee P. J., Eberle L., Amassian V. E., Cracco R. Q., Rudell A., Jayachandra M. Spatial distribution of the electric field induced in volume by round and figure '8' magnetic coils: relevance to activation of sensory nerve fibers. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Aug;76(2):131–141. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90211-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rattay F. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1986 Oct;33(10):974–977. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1986.325670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Reilly J. P. Peripheral nerve stimulation by induced electric currents: exposure to time-varying magnetic fields. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1989 Mar;27(2):101–110. doi: 10.1007/BF02446217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roth B. J., Basser P. J. A model of the stimulation of a nerve fiber by electromagnetic induction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 Jun;37(6):588–597. doi: 10.1109/10.55662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tofts P. S. The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system. Phys Med Biol. 1990 Aug;35(8):1119–1128. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/8/008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ugawa Y., Rothwell J. C., Day B. L., Thompson P. D., Marsden C. D. Magnetic stimulation over the spinal enlargements. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Sep;52(9):1025–1032. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.9.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES