Infant and Child Mortality in Afghanistan Wheat and Chaff

To the Editor,

I read the contribution by Qamar et al., to this journal and I would like to forward some observations from mine, in order to expand the debate on this concern [1]. In brief, one could admit that the manuscript provides an extensive review of the factors contributing to high infant and child mortality rates in Afghanistan, with a particular focus on systemic challenges and possible interventions. Yet, the literature search primarily relies on Google Scholar and PubMed, with a focus on articles in English from the last decade. This might exclude important, relevant studies in other languages or older studies that could provide valuable historical context. Additionally, Afghanistan‐specific studies may be underrepresented if they are not available in English or indexed in these databases.

In general, the study emphasizes findings consistent with high child mortality rates but does not critically examine counterfactual data (e.g., success stories, regions in Afghanistan with relatively better outcomes). This selective emphasis could give a skewed perspective on the situation and reduce understanding of successful interventions within Afghanistan. Moreover, sections discussing the Taliban's role might be perceived as politically biased, focusing more on political instability than on health issues directly. While relevant, the discussion could benefit from greater balance and context on the health‐related impacts, as political aspects may not fully account for regional health disparities or the variability of services.

The authors sometimes implicitly suggest causative relationships, particularly between conflict and mortality rates, without direct evidence [1]. While conflict correlates with healthcare disruption, causation between specific healthcare shortcomings and mortality requires a clear pathway. I found particularly odd this assumption and furthermore, this study relies on secondary literature and reports, which introduces limitations in terms of data accuracy and completeness. It lacks any novel analysis or statistical evaluation, which diminishes the manuscript's contribution to the field [1]. I think that certain data points, such as the mortality rates, do not provide consistent statistical detail. Some statistics are presented with confidence intervals (CIs) and specific hazard ratios, but others lack CIs, potentially misleading readers about data certainty. In addition, terms like “collateral diuretics” appear in the manuscript, but they are not relevant to the study's focus and seem erroneously included. This indicates potential oversight in manuscript editing.

Again, the methods section does not fully describe the criteria for literature inclusion and exclusion or any quality control measures. A more rigorous explanation of the methodology, such as a quality assessment of the studies reviewed, would enhance credibility [1].

Many medical papers fail in statistical evaluation [2].

For example, in Qamar et al.'s paper, the analysis does not sufficiently control for confounding factors such as socioeconomic disparities, cultural norms, or regional health infrastructure variations within Afghanistan [1]. These variables could impact health outcomes independently of conflict, and the analysis would benefit from a multivariate perspective. Again, the manuscript discusses population‐level statistics (e.g., nationwide mortality rates) without adequately addressing variability across different Afghan regions or socioeconomic groups. This broad‐brush approach risks overlooking region‐specific trends and nuances. There are no statistical tests or analyses beyond basic reported rates and hazard ratios from other studies. The manuscript could benefit from pooled data analyses, meta‐analytic techniques, or subgroup comparisons that might reveal important trends in infant and child mortality in Afghanistan. The manuscript does not account for potential confounders like parental education level or rural versus urban healthcare access. A stratified analysis or adjustment using regression techniques would provide more accurate and nuanced insights [1].

However, Qamar et al.,'s contribution covers a broad range of factors that contribute to infant and child mortality in Afghanistan, including health system challenges, conflict, malnutrition, and sociocultural issues. This provides a well‐rounded perspective that could be helpful for policy development [1].

Moreover, the comparison with other countries' mortality rates provides valuable context, emphasizing the severity of the situation in Afghanistan. This comparative framework reinforces the urgency of the issue and adds depth to the analysis. And, in particular, the manuscript offers actionable recommendations such as prioritizing surveillance, enhancing maternal education, and establishing more healthcare facilities in rural areas. These solutions are relevant and targeted to the key challenges identified [1].

Finally, the study lacks any primary data analysis or first‐hand accounts, limiting its contribution to reiterating known information. Integrating primary data from surveys, interviews, or case studies could greatly enhance its value. Although the manuscript mentions sociocultural factors like male‐dominated decision‐making, it lacks depth in analyzing how these factors intersect with healthcare access and infant mortality. This is a missed opportunity to explore complex social determinants more thoroughly. Again, the manuscript mentions COVID‐19's impact but does not fully explain its specific effects on Afghanistan's healthcare infrastructure, such as delayed immunizations or reduced maternal care due to pandemic restrictions. This section could be expanded to provide a clearer understanding of COVID‐19's role. Assertions like the need for breastfeeding as an intervention are well‐supported by general health literature but lack Afghanistan‐specific data in this review. Including regional studies on breastfeeding practices would lend more credibility to such claims.

In conclusion, Qamar et al. provided a broad overview of the challenges and potential interventions for reducing infant and child mortality in Afghanistan. However, it has several limitations, including methodological biases, insufficient statistical analysis, and over‐reliance on secondary data. Strengthening the methodology, incorporating primary data, and conducting a more nuanced analysis of confounding factors would enhance the manuscript's rigor and contribution to the field.

Author Contributions

Salvatore Chirumbolo: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, writing–review and editing, writing–original draft, project administration.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Transparency Statement

The paper is original and has never been submitted to the journal before.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.