Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1993 Feb;461:27–46. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019499

The role of the motor cortex in the control of vigour of locomotor movements in the cat.

I N Beloozerova 1, M G Sirota 1
PMCID: PMC1175243  PMID: 8350266

Abstract

1. The impulse activity of single neurones in the motor cortex (MC) was recorded extracellularly using movable varnish-insulated tungsten microelectrodes in four adult freely moving cats. The cats walked inside the experimental box with various loadings in the swing or stance phases of the step cycle. The mean discharge rate (mR) and the depth of frequency modulation (dM) in each neurone were estimated over 10-100 steps. 2. The activity of thirty-one cells (including eighteen pyramidal tract neurones (PTNs)) was recorded during uphill walking on a 10 deg inclined floor. The mR in 68%, and the dM in 77% of neurones changed by less than 20% during uphill locomotion compared to walking on a level surface. 3. The activity of the same neurones was also recorded during downhill walking, also on a 10 deg inclined plane. The mR in 69% and the dM in 78% of neurones changed by less than 20% during downhill locomotion compared with walking on a level surface. 4. The activity of twenty-three (the left hemisphere) cells (sixteen PTNs) during walking with the floor swaying to the right (R) and to the left (L) was compared to activity during locomotion on a stable surface. The mR in 83% and the dM in 83% of cells in R-steps, and in 82 and 77% of cells, respectively, in L-steps changed by less than 20%. 5. The activity of thirty-seven cells was studied during locomotion at various speeds. The mR in 68% and the dM in 38% of cells changed by less than 20% during fast and slow locomotion compared to middle-speed locomotion. The dM in 46% of neurones increased with the transfer from slow to fast walking. 6. The activity of thirty-one MC cells was recorded during locomotion with loads of 85 g attached to the distal part of each elbow. The mR in 52% and the dM in 48% of neurones changed by more than 20%. 7. The activity of twenty-eight cells (six PTNs) was studied in steps when an animal turned. The swing of the limb contralateral to the recorded MC was shorter (condition 1) in turning steps in one direction, and was longer (condition 2) in turning steps in the opposite direction. The mR in 50% and the dM in 50% of cells in condition 1 and in 52% and 59%, respectively, of cells in condition 2 changed by more than 20%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
27

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos A., Armstrong D. M., Marple-Horvat D. E. Responses of motor cortical neurones in the cat to unexpected perturbations of locomotion. Neurosci Lett. 1989 Sep 25;104(1-2):147–151. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90345-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong D. M., Drew T. Discharges of pyramidal tract and other motor cortical neurones during locomotion in the cat. J Physiol. 1984 Jan;346:471–495. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong D. M., Drew T. Electromyographic responses evoked in muscles of the forelimb by intracortical stimulation in the cat. J Physiol. 1985 Oct;367:309–326. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong D. M., Drew T. Locomotor-related neuronal discharges in cat motor cortex compared with peripheral receptive fields and evoked movements. J Physiol. 1984 Jan;346:497–517. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Armstrong D. M., Drew T. Topographical localization in the motor cortex of the cat for somatic afferent responses and evoked movements. J Physiol. 1984 May;350:33–54. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asanuma H., Fernandez J., Scheibel M. E., Scheibel A. B. Characteristics of projections from the nucleus ventralis lateralis to the motor cortex in the cats: an anatomical and physiological study. Exp Brain Res. 1974;20(4):315–330. doi: 10.1007/BF00237378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beloozerova I. N., Sirota M. G. The role of the motor cortex in the control of accuracy of locomotor movements in the cat. J Physiol. 1993 Feb;461:1–25. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drew T. Motor cortical cell discharge during voluntary gait modification. Brain Res. 1988 Aug 2;457(1):181–187. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90073-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evarts E. V., Fromm C., Kröller J., Jennings V. A. Motor Cortex control of finely graded forces. J Neurophysiol. 1983 May;49(5):1199–1215. doi: 10.1152/jn.1983.49.5.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Forssberg H. Stumbling corrective reaction: a phase-dependent compensatory reaction during locomotion. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Jul;42(4):936–953. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.4.936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heglund N. C., Cavagna G. A. Efficiency of vertebrate locomotory muscles. J Exp Biol. 1985 Mar;115:283–292. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Orlovskii G. N., Severin F. V., Shik M. L. Vliianie skorosti i nagruzki na koordinatsiiu dvizhenii pri bege sobaki. Biofizika. 1966;11(2):364–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Orlovsky G. N. The effect of different descending systems on flexor and extensor activity during locomotion. Brain Res. 1972 May 26;40(2):359–371. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90139-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer C. I., Marks W. B., Bak M. J. The responses of cat motor cortical units to electrical cutaneous stimulation during locomotion and during lifting, falling and landing. Exp Brain Res. 1985;58(1):102–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00238958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pierotti D. J., Roy R. R., Gregor R. J., Edgerton V. R. Electromyographic activity of cat hindlimb flexors and extensors during locomotion at varying speeds and inclines. Brain Res. 1989 Feb 27;481(1):57–66. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90485-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rispal-Padel L., Grangetto A. The cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway. Topographical investigation at the unitary level in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1977 May 23;28(1-2):101–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00237089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Severin F. V., Orlovskii G. N., Shik M. L. Rabota myshechnykh retseptorov pri upravliaemoi lokomotsii. Biofizika. 1967 May-Jun;12(3):502–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES