Skip to main content
Journal of Patient Experience logoLink to Journal of Patient Experience
. 2025 Jan 22;12:23743735251314648. doi: 10.1177/23743735251314648

Impact of Standardized Reporting Systems on Patient Experience in Radiology

Igor Toker 1,, Sven Jansen 1, Daniel Lorenz 1
PMCID: PMC11752732  PMID: 39845697

Abstract

Patient experience is a vital measure of healthcare quality, affecting satisfaction, engagement, and outcomes. Standardized radiology reporting can improve care by enhancing communication, reducing errors, and optimizing workflows. This article examines the role of structured reporting and AI in improving patient experience, addressing challenges like workload imbalances and communication issues. Key points include adopting standardized systems, leveraging AI, and focusing on patient-centered communication. Practical tips are shared to boost reporting accuracy, patient engagement, and care quality.

Keywords: standardized reporting in radiology, patient experience, artificial intelligence in healthcare, diagnostic accuracy, radiology workflow optimization, patient-centered care, improving patient satisfaction, guided reporting

Introduction

Patient experience covers interactions like communication, comfort, and treatment effectiveness. Studies highlight growing patient demand for involvement in decision-making and personalized care. 1 Most patients now prefer shared decision-making, showing a shift towards patient-centered care. Positive patient experiences are linked to better health outcomes and higher satisfaction, while effective communication builds trust and supports improved decision-making.

Current Challenges of Radiology to Enhance Patient Experience

The patient experience within the department of Radiology is facing significant challenges. Increasing workloads, workforce shortages, and delays in obtaining radiographic imaging all contribute to a strained system. Advances in imaging have increased data volume, but the workforce has not kept pace, leading to delays in diagnosis. For instance, in the UK, demand for CT and MRI scans grew by 11% in 2023, while the workforce only grew by 6%. Similar issues occur in the U.S., with shortages causing delays in critical diagnostics. Many radiologists are also nearing retirement, 2 further straining resources. Technological disconnects and workflow inefficiencies add to these problems, as do diagnostic errors and communication gaps, which can result in misdiagnoses and delayed treatments.

Actionable-Insights

Integrating Technology to Enhance Patient Experience

To meet the growing demands for improved patient experience in radiology, including expectations for timely communication, clarity, and patient-centered care, it is essential to integrate and apply innovative reporting technologies that are already available. Achieving this goal requires going far beyond the use of traditional reporting templates, which rely on free text dictation or manual input. While these methods have demonstrated some improvements in healthcare service delivery, they fall short of the advancements needed to significantly enhance patient experience. 3

The next level of patient care necessitates the adoption of software-based solutions that guide the reporting process, standardizing and structuring it in a comprehensive manner.4,5 Only with the implementation of standardized reporting systems, ideally featuring a guided reporting approach, can the challenges outlined in the previous section be systematically addressed.3,4

These challenges can be overcome because of the benefits that standardized reporting systems provide, including:

Efficiency: Evidence shows that structured reporting in radiology improves workflow efficiency. A systematic review confirms faster report generation and more consistent workflows, especially when multiple templates address various clinical needs. This is particularly beneficial in neurology and abdominal imaging, where structured reports streamline data entry and formatting​. 6 Additionally, the European Society of Radiology (ESR) emphasizes that structured reporting standardizes report formats, reducing errors and accelerating report finalization​. 5

Error Reduction: Utilizing a standardized checklist format, Standardized Reporting Systems reduce cognitive load on radiologists, thereby decreasing the likelihood of errors and ensuring that critical information is accurately communicated to enhance patient safety. A checklist-style reporting system for cervical spine CTs demonstrated significant error reduction, particularly in detecting non-fracture findings. Reports generated with the checklist system had fewer missed findings compared to free-text reports, highlighting the benefits of structured reporting in increasing diagnostic accuracy. 7 Structured reporting templates also promote thoroughness by guiding radiologists through a systematic review of key findings, which helps reduce premature closure and other common cognitive errors in reporting​.

Moreover, checklists have been shown to improve clarity and consistency in reporting, contributing to better patient outcomes and increased satisfaction among referring physicians. 3

Optimizing Reporting Communication

Standardized Reporting Systems play a critical role in enhancing communication between radiologists and healthcare providers, leading to more coordinated care and the creation of precise treatment plans. These systems streamline report formats, reducing miscommunication and improving overall healthcare outcomes.3,8 Additionally, some systems offer patient-friendly versions of reports, helping bridge the gap between medical jargon and patient understanding. By simplifying complex information, patients are empowered to engage more actively in their healthcare decisions. 8 Furthermore, although the evidence for multilingual capabilities in these systems is limited, the growing need for accessible healthcare information suggests that such features could play a vital role in overcoming language barriers and improving global healthcare communication. 3

The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Prioritizing Workflow

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing radiology by enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. AI algorithms can swiftly analyze medical images, reducing errors and improving diagnostic outcomes.

However, the growing number of AI tools risks overwhelming radiologists. A reporting software should also serve as an AI hub to tackle this issue, integrating results into a single platform, allowing radiologists to benefit from various AI tools without disrupting their workflow. Although AI tools can reduce radiologists’ workloads—by 34% in certain settings like breast cancer screenings 9 —realizing the full value of AI requires more than just integration into existing workflows. To truly enhance efficiency and quality in radiology, a fundamental change and standardization in both input and output processes are necessary. Without such standardization, the disparate AI tools cannot work together effectively, leading to fragmented workflows that fail to deliver the promised improvements in efficiency or diagnostic accuracy. For instance, standardized data formats and unified reporting structures are critical for enabling AI to provide consistent and actionable insights across different systems. 10

Nevertheless, AI solutions must be carefully selected, considering the risks of overdiagnosis and biases in AI training to ensure patient safety and care quality. One of the significant challenges in implementing AI in radiology is the lack of standardization across platforms and the integration issues that arise from using multiple AI tools with different user interfaces. This often leads to workflow inefficiencies, as radiologists may have to switch between various systems to access AI-generated insights, thereby diminishing the potential benefits of AI. 10

A holistic approach to AI implementation, which addresses both the technological and organizational challenges, is critical for realizing the full potential of AI in clinical practice. This approach includes the standardization of workflows and the establishment of common data protocols to allow AI tools to operate efficiently within the radiology ecosystem, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and greater operational efficiency.

Practical Recommendations

Implementation of Standardized Reporting Systems

Software-based reporting solutions that provide guidance can help standardize the reporting process. Such systems have the potential to reduce the cognitive load on radiologists, minimize diagnostic errors, and ensure consistency across reports. Incorporating guided reporting into the workflow may systematically cover essential diagnostic elements.

Leveraging AI Integration for Workflow Optimization

A centralized AI platform that integrates multiple diagnostic tools and standardized reporting within a single interface could streamline the workflow. This integration might reduce the time spent switching between systems and allow radiologists to interpret AI-generated insights more efficiently.

Focusing on Enhancing Communication with Patients and Providers

Developing or using software-enhanced, patient-friendly versions of radiology reports with clear and accessible language can improve patient understanding. Visual aids, such as annotated images, may also play a role. Structured reports could facilitate collaboration between radiologists and referring physicians.

Addressing Workforce Shortages with Innovative Strategies

Introducing AI tools to automate routine tasks can allow radiologists to focus on more complex cases. This approach may alleviate workload pressure, improve job satisfaction, and ultimately help reduce burnout rates.

Continuous Measurement and Optimization of Report Quality

Machine-readable, structured reports can be utilized to track key performance indicators (KPIs) such as report turnaround times, diagnostic accuracy, and error rates. Regular analysis of these KPIs might identify areas for improvement, and workflow adjustments could enhance the overall patient experience.

Conclusion

Patient experience in radiology goes beyond the technical aspects of care delivery, encompassing patient engagement, communication, and understanding throughout the treatment process. As healthcare moves towards more patient-centered models, it is essential for radiology practices to adopt systems that enhance both the quality and efficiency of reporting. Structured reporting systems address key challenges by improving communication between healthcare providers, reducing diagnostic errors, and delivering clear, understandable reports to patients.

In addition to these benefits, addressing workforce challenges in radiology, such as rising workloads and workforce shortages, will be critical to maintaining high standards of care. Technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence, offer promising solutions to reduce diagnostic errors and improve workflow efficiency, enabling radiologists to meet increasing demands while maintaining quality.

Public accountability through tools like Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys further ensures that care quality is continuously measured and improved. By integrating structured reporting, AI, and accountability measures, radiology practices can better deliver safe, effective, and patient-centered care, ultimately improving both clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Footnotes

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors of this manuscript are employed by Neo Q Quality in Imaging GmbH, a company that develops software solutions for radiologists. As such, there may be a potential conflict of interest. However, we would like to emphasize that the content of this article is based on our extensive experience and is intended to provide an objective perspective on the impact of standardized reporting systems on patient experience. Our goal is to contribute to the ongoing dialogue in the field and support the enhancement of patient care.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Contribution List: Author 1, Author 2, and Author 3 contributed equally to the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors participated in drafting the article, reviewing the content for accuracy and clarity, and approving the final version for submission.

References

  • 1.Kim EJ, Koo YR, Nam IC. Patients and healthcare Providers’ perspectives on patient experience factors and a model of patient-centered care communication: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2024;12(11):1090. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rawson JV, Smetherman D, Rubin E. Short-Term strategies for augmenting the national radiologist workforce. Am J Roentgenol. 2024;222(6):e2430920. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.30920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pesapane F, Tantrige P, De Marco P, et al. Advancements in standardizing radiological reports: a comprehensive review. Medicina (Mex). 2023;59(9):1679. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coppola F, Faggioni L. Template-Based structured reporting. In: Fatehi M, Pinto Dos Santos D, eds. Structured reporting in radiology. Imaging informatics for healthcare professionals. Springer International Publishing; 2022:103-117. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91349-6_5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.European Society of Radiology (ESR), Dos Santos DP, Kotter E, Mildenberger P, Martí-Bonmatí L. ESR Paper on structured reporting in radiology—update 2023. Insights Imaging. 2023;14(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01560-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nobel JM, van Geel K, Robben SGF. Structured reporting in radiology: a systematic review to explore its potential. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(4):2837-54. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08327-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin E, Powell DK, Kagetsu NJ. Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations. J Digit Imaging. 2014;27(5):588-93. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reiner BI. Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(4):610-3. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9615-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lauritzen AD, Lillholm M, Lynge E, Nielsen M, Karssemeijer N, Vejborg I. Early indicators of the impact of using AI in mammography screening for breast cancer. Moy L, ed. Radiology. 2024;311(3):e232479. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim B, Romeijn S, Van Buchem M, Mehrizi MHR, Grootjans W. A holistic approach to implementing artificial intelligence in radiology. Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01586-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Patient Experience are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES