Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients often develop chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), including sclerodermatous changes [1]. First-line therapy includes corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors [2]. Unfortunately, > 70% of patients require treatment beyond first-line due to toxicity and/or insufficient response [3]. There is a paucity of data on the efficacy of agent combinations. A study of 26 cGVHD patients reported a 77% response to combination therapy of with belumosudil and one to three of the following treatments: extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), ruxolitinib, prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus and/or calcineurin inhibitors [4].
Herein, we report on thirteen cGVHD patients (8 by retrospective chart review and 5 by prospective observation) with age range from 34 to 77 (Table 1) treated with combination ECP and belumosudil. ECP is a well-established second-line therapy that induces T-regulatory cells (T-reg) and monocyte-to-dendritic cell differentiation, while the recently approved ROCK2 inhibitor belumosudil has been shown to induce T-regs and inhibit fibrotic pathways. All had involvement of the skin/joint/fascia, while ten (77%) had eye, two (15%) had mouth, and four (29%) had lung involvement. At the start of treatment, the NIH cGVHD Global Severity scores included one (8%) with mild disease, six (46%) with moderate, and six (46%) with severe. By the NIH Clinical Response Scale at four months, eight (62%) demonstrated a partial response and five (38%) experienced stable disease. Of eight patients followed for 11 to 18 months, six (75%) demonstrated continuous improvement, one experienced stable disease (13%), and one experienced worsening (13%). No serious adverse events were observed. Two (15%) reported mild fatigue, two noted mild pruritus (15%), and one experienced nausea (8%). Baseline and follow up images were taken with a range of 3 to 18 months (Fig. 1).
Table 1.
Patient characteristics including duration of disease, prior treatment, baseline NIH score, which treatment was started first and for how long before starting the combination of the two agents, ECP and belumosudil dose during combination treatment, and 4-month NIH clinical response score
| Combination Treatment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Duration of Chronic GvHD | Prior Therapies | Baseline NIH Score | Treatment Started First and Duration Before Starting Combination | ECP Dose | Bel Dose | 4 Month NIH Clinical Response | |
| 1 | 5 year 10 mo | Pred, rux, siro, tacro | Mild | ECP, 2 year 10 mo | Every 2 weeks | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
| 2 | 4 yr | Rux, siro | Moderate | Bel, 6 mo | Weekly | 200 mg QD | Stable | |
| 3 | 4 year 5 mo | Rux, tacro | Moderate | Bel, 2 mo | Weekly | 200 mg QD | Stable | |
| 4 | 5 year 2 mo | Pred, rux, tacro | Moderate | ECP, 2 mo | Twice weekly | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
| 5 | 5 year 8 mo | Rux, tacro | Moderate | ECP, 4 year 2 mo | Every 2 weeks | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
| 6 | 5 year 11 mo | Pred, rux, siro | Moderate | ECP, 5 mo | Weekly | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
| 7 | 10 year 4 mo | MMF, pred, rux, siro | Moderate | ECP, 3 year 10 mo | Weekly | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
| 8 | 3 year 4 mo | Pred, rux tacro | Severe | ECP, 1 mo | Twice weekly | 200 mg QD | Stable | |
| 9 | 3 year 9 mo | Rux, siro, | Severe | ECP, 11mo | Every 2 weeks | 200 mg QD | Stable | |
| 10 | 4 year 11 mo | Pred, tacro | Severe | Bel, 4 mo | Twice weekly | 200 mg QD | Stable | |
| 11 | 5 year 8 mo | Pred, rux | Severe | ECP, 4mo | Twice weekly | 200 mg BID | Partial Response | |
| 12 | 5 year 11 mo | Pred, rux, tacro | Severe | ECP, 1 year 2 mo | Every 2 weeks | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
| 13 | 10 year 6 mo | MMF, tacro | Severe | Bel, 1 year 11 mo | Twice weekly | 200 mg QD | Partial Response | |
Belumosudil: bel, BID: twice a day, MMF: mycophenolate mofetil, Pred: prednisone, Tacro: tacrolimus, QD: daily, Rux: ruxolitinb, Siro: sirolimus
Fig. 1.
Representative images of cutaneous, subcutaneous, and joint range of motion improvement following initiation of combination treatment with extracorporeal photopheresis and belumosudil, with baseline photographs on the left of each set and after treatment photographs on the right
Four had matched physical therapy measurements and a significant decrease in percent deviation from normal range of motion was observed: shoulder (p = 0.0001), hip (p = 0.0046), and ankle (p = 0.0091). Five had matched PFT results: two started and remained above 80% predicted FVC and FEV1 (normal findings), one started just below 80% and crossed to above, and two remained below.
This retrospective/observational study supports that combination ECP and belumosudil therapy is well tolerated and may improve cutaneous and systemic fibrosis in patients with cGVHD, with 62% (eight subjects) demonstrating improvement and the other 38% (five subjects) experiencing stable disease at four months of combination treatment. While belumosudil therapy alone has demonstrated a 59–62% symptom reduction in patients in another study [3] and ECP alone has been reported with overall response rates as high as 80% [5], we suggest that the clinical responses in patients receiving combination therapy (Fig. 1) is particularly noteworthy for improvement in subcutaneous/fascial involvement. Though limited to a subset of subjects with matched data, other objective measures of physical therapy range of motion and pulmonary function testing also support the benefits of this combination therapy. Limitations include the retrospective and observational aspects which limited follow-up times, lack of standardization of initiation of combination therapy, and lack of physical therapy and pulmonary data across all patients. Our findings further suggest that prospective, randomized, single versus combination therapy studies are warranted.
Author contributions
MAS, JC, and MG wrote the main manuscript text. MAS and MG prepared Fig. 1. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this work are available from reasonable request from the corresponding author, Michael Girardi, MD.
Declarations
Competing interests
This work was supported in part by an external collaborative research grant from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals.
Footnotes
The original online version of this article was revised to correct a sentence and Reference 5.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
3/8/2025
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s00403-025-04005-4
References
- 1.Baumrin E et al (2024) Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part I: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol 90(1):1–16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baumrin E et al (2024) Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II: disease activity grading and therapeutic management. J Am Acad Dermatol 90(1):19–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cutler C et al (2021) Belumosudil for chronic graft-versus-host disease after 2 or more prior lines of therapy: the ROCKstar Study. Blood 138(22):2278–2289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chin M et al (2022) Belumosudil Combination Therapy in Refractory Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 140(Supplement 1):4788–4789 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Greinix HT et al (1998) Successful use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy in the treatment of severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 92(9):3098–3104 [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this work are available from reasonable request from the corresponding author, Michael Girardi, MD.

