Abstract
A novel strain of the genus Holzapfeliella, named He02T, was isolated from flowers of Satureja montana L. in a survey for lactic acid bacteria associated with wild and cultivated plants in the metropolitan area of Valencia, Spain. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a similarity of 99% to Holzapfeliella floricola DSM 23037T=Ryu1-2T. Strain He02T cells are Gram-stain-positive, catalase-negative non-motile rods, usually occurring in pairs. Cells show a pale yellow pigmentation when pelleted. As H. floricola, strain He02T utilized a narrow range of carbohydrates, namely, glucose and fructose, homofermentatively. However, genome sequencing and estimation of average nucleotide identity (ANI) revealed an ANI value of 87.44 with H. floricola DSM 23037T, the only H. floricola strain sequenced to date. A value of 30.5% for digital DNA–DNA hybridization was estimated with the Type Strain Genome Server tool when He02T was compared with strain DSM 23037T. These results indicate that strain He02T constitutes a novel species, for which the name Holzapfeliella saturejae sp. nov. with He02T (=CECT 31001T=DSM 117324T=CCM 9395T) as type strain is proposed.
Keywords: flower, Holzapfeliella, Satureja montana, Valencia
Introduction
Plants host diverse communities of micro-organisms, which are associated with their different organs such as roots, leaves or flowers [1]. These communities encompass a wide variety of micro-organisms and may play a beneficial role in improving growth and protection from potential pathogens. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a group of low G-C, Gram-stain-positive bacteria classified within the order Lactobacillales which are characterized by the production of lactic acid from the fermentative degradation of carbohydrates. The order includes the families Aerococcaceae, Carnobacteriaceae, Enterococcaceae, Lactobacillaceae and Streptococcaceae. LAB are important starter, commensal or pathogenic micro-organisms. LAB roles in the production of fermented food products, as pathogens or as probiotics, have received the most attention. Notwithstanding, recent studies have started to identify a growing number of plant-associated LAB species and reveal their relevance as components of these microbial communities [2]. For example, fructophilic LAB have been found typically present in niches rich in fructose, such as fruits and flowers, as well as the gut of pollinating insects [3]. This group is characterized by their heterofermentative metabolism, poor growth on glucose and good growth on fructose. Interestingly, fructophilic LAB encompass LAB species belonging to different genera that have sustained genomic convergent evolution [4].
In the course of a study of the population of fructophilic LAB associated with flowering plants in the metropolitan area of Valencia, Spain, diverse LAB species were isolated. Among them, strain He02T could be classified in the Lactobacillaceae genus Holzapfeliella but displayed distinctive characteristics that set it apart from Holzapfeliella floricola, the only species of the genus described to date. H. floricola was originally named Lactobacillus floricola [5] and later transferred to the genus Holzapfelia after a major revision of the classification of species of families Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae [6]. Subsequently, the genus name was changed to Holzapfeliella to avoid homonymy with an extinct genus of molluscs [7]. H. floricola strains were isolated from flowers collected in mountainous areas in Japan [5]. The type strain H. floricola DSM 23037T was isolated from a flower of Caltha palustris in the Oze National Park [5]. Phenotypic characterization of H. floricola showed that this species degrades d-glucose to l-lactic acid homofermentatively, thus indicating that H. floricola is not a fructophilic LAB although it shares the same niches. This species only utilized glucose or fructose as carbon sources. Since the original description of the species [5], no further research has been carried out. Therefore, limited information is available about this genus.
Strain isolation
Strain He02T was isolated from aseptically collected flowers of Satureja montana L. (Lamiaceae; winter savoury) grown in a domestic cultivar in Lliria (Valencia, Spain; GPS coordinates 39.675, –0.613). Five flowers were transferred to a screw-capped polypropylene tube containing 5 ml of modified fructose yeast peptone broth [FYP; composition per litre: 10 g d-fructose, 10 g yeast extract, 2.5 g tryptone, 2.5 g meat extract, 2 g sodium acetate, 0.5 g Tween 80, 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g MnSO4·4H2O, 0.01 g FeSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g NaCl, 0.05 g cycloheximide and 0.05 g sodium azide (pH 6.8)] [8]. The tube was vortexed vigorously and incubated at 30 °C until turbidity was observed. Aliquots were conveniently diluted in saline solution [NaCl 0.9% (w/v)] and spread onto FYP agar plates supplemented with 5 g l−1 of CaCO3. The plates were incubated at 30 °C, and isolated colonies were picked on the basis of morphological characteristics and the presence of clear halos due to acid production. The selected colonies were streaked on FYP agar plates to ensure culture homogeneity. Gram-stain-positive and catalase-negative isolates were selected, and a single colony was inoculated in FYP broth and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Grown cultures were supplemented with glycerol (15% v/v final concentration) and stored at −80 °C.
Preliminary identification of isolates was carried out by PCR amplification and partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene with primers 27F (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT) [9]. The nucleotide blast tool (blastn) implemented in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) web server (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to compare the He02T isolate 16S rRNA gene sequence (GenBank Acc. No. OR978308) with sequences available in the GenBank databases. Based on the blast result, He02T was provisionally assigned to the genus Holzapfeliella. The full-length 16S rRNA sequence of He02T was subsequently extracted from the whole-genome sequence (see below) and used to obtain a 16S rRNA-based phylogeny by maximum likelihood (Fig. 1). Full-length 16S rRNA sequences of Holzapfeliella floricola (some of them deposited as Lactobacillus floricola) and representative species of the most closely related genera, according to the phylogenetic reconstruction of family Lactobacillaceae performed by Zheng et al. [6], were selected. For this purpose, blastn searches directed against the selected genera were carried out using He02T 16S RNA gene sequence as a query. The hits obtained were manually inspected and representative complete 16S RNA gene sequences were selected. All sequences were extracted from GenBank and aligned using muscle as implemented in mega 11.0.3 [10]. The best substitution model was selected by maximum likelihood in mega. The maximum-likelihood tree was reconstructed with IQ-TREE with the GTR+F+G4 substitution model [11]. Support values were obtained by the ultrafast bootstrap approximation [12]. The phylogenetic analysis confirmed that strain He02T belongs to the genus Holzapfeliella. Two clusters within Holzapfeliella were differentiated, one containing He02T and H. floricola Aza1-1, and the other, strains Gon2-9, JCM16512 and Ryu4-3 (Fig. 1). A recent survey of the distribution of Lactobacillaceae in different foods and food environments by using metataxonomic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene also pointed, through the examination of amplicon sequence variants of the 16S rRNA V3–V4 region, to the likely existence of different and previously undescribed species within this genus [13]. This study identified Holzapfeliella 16S rDNA amplicons in samples derived from bovine muscle, cattle milk and cheese. Given that the only known source of H. floricola isolates was flowers, the presence of Holzapfeliella amplicons in those samples was hypothesized to be associated with pasture [13].
Fig. 1. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA sequences of representative Holzapfeliella and closely related genera strains. Support values are given for those nodes with support higher than 75%. The tree has been arbitrarily rooted for ease of visualization.
Genome features of strain He02T
He02T total DNA was extracted using an in-house cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-based purification method (to be published elsewhere) and quantified using a Qubit V3 fluorometer (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Sequencing libraries were prepared using Ligation Sequencing Kit V14 (SQK-LSK114, Oxford Nanopore) with barcoding SQK-NBD114.24. Libraries generated were sequenced in a MinION equipment using a FLO-MIN114 Vr10.4.1 flow cell (Oxford Nanopore) and duplex base-calling in the super-accuracy mode selected. The mean read size was 1867 bp with a mean read quality of 20.5 as assessed with NanoPlot v1.36.2 [14]. Reads were assembled with Flye v2.9.1 [15]. The assembly was deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank (BioProject PRJNA1031542) and annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [16].
Recommendations outlined by Riesco and Trujillo [17] for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes were attended to evaluate our genomic data. A total of 1 468 086 bp were sequenced and assembled in six contigs (contig N50=1.2 Mb; contig L50=1; genome coverage 86×) with a G+C content of 34.99 mol%. The completeness and contaminations were assessed with CheckM [18] and reported as 96.24 and 0.98%, respectively. Completeness was also estimated with BUSCO [19] as implemented in the Galaxy platform [20]. A completeness of 98.51% was estimated. These values are within the thresholds (≥95% complete with ≤5% contamination) considered acceptable for taxonomy assignments [18]. The genome of H. floricola Ryu1-2T=DSM 23037T (genome assembly GCA_001436605.1) is the only genome sequence available for this species and comprises 1 363 353 bp with a G+C content of 34.5 mol% . The analysis of the He02T sequence identified 1403 protein-encoding genes, 13 pseudogenes and 70 RNA-encoding genes, which included 4 rRNA operons, 54 tRNAs and 3 non-coding RNAs.
In order to determine more accurately the taxonomic position of strain He02T, a core genome phylogeny was obtained (Fig. 2). Reconstruction of the phylogeny was derived by concatenating 20 validated core genes. The core gene set was selected to obtain the highest bacterial phylogenetic fidelity while minimizing missing data [21]. This set encompasses RNA polymerase subunits alpha and beta (rpoA and rpoB); 50S ribosomal proteins L1, L2, L3 and L5; 30S ribosomal proteins S2, S3, S5 and S7; ribosome-associated GTPases Der and CgtA; translation initiation factor IF-2; translation elongation factor 4; peptide chain release factor 1; transcription termination factor NusA; phenylalanine-tRNA ligase subunit alpha; signal recognition particle Ffh; preprotein translocase subunit SecY; and redox-regulated ATPase YchF. Protein sequences were extracted, aligned and concatenated by using VBCG v1.3 [21]. The best substitution model was selected by maximum likelihood in mega 11.0.3. The maximum-likelihood tree was reconstructed with IQ-TREE with the LG+G4+I+F+R substitution model [22]. Support values were obtained by the ultrafast bootstrap approximation implemented in IQ-TREE [12].
Fig. 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of core genes of Holzapfeliella and species of closely related genera. Support values are given for those nodes with support higher than 75%. The tree has been arbitrarily rooted for ease of visualization.
As previously observed in the 16S rRNA phylogeny, He02T strain clustered with H. floricola DSM 23037T, but the phylogenetic distance between the two genomes suggested that He02T constitute a different species (Fig. 2). In order to ascertain the taxonomic status of strain He02T, average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were calculated with FastANI [23] as implemented in Proksee [24] and OrthoANI [25]. The ANI values between strains He02T and H. floricola DSM 23037T were 87.44 and 86.02, with FastANI and OrthoANI, respectively. These values are below the proposed threshold (95–96%) for distinguishing between bacterial species [23,26]. In addition, digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) was carried out with Type Strain Genome Server [27]. A value of 30.5% (confidence interval 28.2–33.1%) was obtained with formula d4, which is recommended for incomplete genomes [28]. This value lies also below the threshold for bacterial species.
Functional characterization of H. saturejae genome
The analysis of the He02T genome mobilome was carried out using Islandviewer 4 [29] for genomic islands, ISfinder [30] (http://www-is.biotoul.fr) for IS elements and PHASTEST [31] for prophages. The analysis of the metabolic capabilities of H. saturejae He02T was carried out using BlastKOALA [32]. A search for carbohydrate-active enzymes was performed with dbCAN3 [33]. The presence of a CRISPR anti-phage defence system was examined with CRISPRCasFinder [34], and the search for antimicrobial resistance systems was carried out using ResFinder v2.0 [35]. Additionally, analyses of antibiotic resistance models and bioactive secondary metabolite gene clusters were conducted using the ARTS 2.0 [36] program and antiSMASH 7.0 [37].
The searches for genomic islands or IS elements did not detect any genetic mobile element. The sequence was also inspected for putative plasmid replication proteins. Five putative plasmid replication proteins were found in four contigs (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material), suggesting the presence of plasmids in this strain corresponding to contigs 3, 4, 5 and 6. However, this point remains hypothetical until the current assembly is verified. The analysis with PHASTEST detected two phage regions (Fig. S1; contig 4; acc. NZ_JAWMWG010000003.1; R4Y45_06025 to R4Y45_06270, and contig 7; acc. NZ_JAWMWG010000006.1; R4Y45_07195 to R4Y45_07295). The analysis of the gene content indicates that the first region encompasses modules for replication, assembly, capsid and lysis. However, genes for integration and immunity were not detected. The second region only contained genes encoding for capsid components and lysis. Therefore, these regions may constitute remnants of prophages no longer functional. The search for a CRISPR anti-phage system failed to detect any putative CRISPR cluster in H. saturejae He02T. In contrast, H. floricola DSM 23037T encodes a CRISPR/Cas9 cluster (genes FC86_GL000508 to FC86_GL000511). Subsquent tblastn searches using the H. floricola genes against the genome of strain He02T confirmed the absence of a CRISPR cluster in this strain.
The analysis with BlastKOALA mapped 58% of the annotated genes and suggested that strain He02T had limited metabolic capabilities (Fig. S2). As examples, carbohydrate metabolism accounted for 7% of mapped genes, and amino acid metabolism accounted for 5%.
Carbohydrate metabolism
Strain He02T encodes the genes required for the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas homofermentative pathway (Fig. S3). Regarding the metabolism of pentoses, strain He02T encodes enzymes required for the conversion of glucose or fructose into pentoses (Fig. S4) but lacks the enzymes required for the Entner-Doudoroff pathway, transaldolase (EC 2.2.1.2) and transketolase (EC 2.2.1.1) which agrees with its inability to grow on pentoses as carbon sources (see below). Notwithstanding, He02T encodes a putative phosphoketolase (EC 4.1.2.9), which splits d-xylulose 5-phosphate into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and acetyl-phosphate (R4Y45_01830, not mapped in BlastKOALA). Whether this enzyme is actually expressed remains to be determined. Carbohydrate biosynthetic capabilities are also limited as strain He02T lacks a gluconeogenic pathway (Fig. S3).
The production of d- and l-lactic was measured in MRS by using Enzytec™ Liquid D-/L-Lactic acid kit (Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the supernatant of an overnight culture was obtained by centrifugation and filtered through a 0.22 µm pore-size filter. The filtered supernatant was appropriately diluted and used to determine the presence of l-lactic acid or d-lactic acid by measuring the increase in NADH resulting from reactions catalyzed by either d-lactate dehydrogenase or l-lactate dehydrogenase. The results revealed that He02T produced L-lactic acid from glucose with no detectable levels of d-lactic acid (Table 1). This finding agrees with the previous observation that H. floricola only produces l-lactic acid from glucose [5]. However, strain He02T encodes two putative proteins (R4Y45_02115 and R4Y45_05745) with significant similarity to putative d- lactate dehydrogenases. No homologs are found in the genome of H. floricola DSM 23037T. Both proteins belong to the D-2-hydroxyacid NAD(+)-dependent dehydrogenase family, which encompasses various enzymes acting on different D-hydroxy-carboxylic acids. Consequently, amino acid sequence alone is insufficient to predict their enzymatic activities.
Table 1. Growth characteristics of H. saturejae He02T.
| Condition | Specific growth rate (h−1) | Maximal OD | Lactic acid isomer | MIC (µg ml−1) |
| Growth in MRS | L | |||
| Growth in MRS (pH 6.5) | 0.041±0.002 | 0.303±0.028 | ||
| Growth in MRS (pH 5.5) | 0.002±0.001 | 0.060±0.018 | ||
| Growth in MRS (pH 4.5) | – | – | ||
| Growth in MRS (pH 6.5; 0.5% NaCl) | 0.070±0.007 | 0.411±0.059 | ||
| Growth in MRS (pH 6.5; 1% NaCl) | 0.033±0.004 | 0.275±0.04 | ||
| Growth in MRS (pH 6.5; 2% NaCl) | – | – | ||
| Growth in FYP (pH 6.5; aerobic) | 0.003±0.001 | 0.062±0.012 | ||
| Growth in FYP (pH 6.5; anaerobic) | 0.167±0.046 | 0.350±0.011 | ||
| Growth in GYP (pH 6.5; aerobic) | 0.071±0.004 | 0.434±0.022 | ||
| Growth in GYP (pH 6.5; anaerobic) | 0.236±0.011 | 1.193±0.033 | ||
| Growth in GYP (pH 6.5; anaerobic; pyruvate 0.25%) | 0.234±0.011 | 1.182±0.032 | ||
| Growth in GYP (pH 6.5; anaerobic; pyruvate 0.5%) | 0.234±0.009 | 1.168±0.022 | ||
| Ampicillin | 0.25 | |||
| Clindamycin | 0.016 | |||
| Chloramphenicol | 2 | |||
| Erythromycin | 0.25 | |||
| Gentamycin | 128 | |||
| Kanamycin | >256 | |||
| Tetracycline | 1 | |||
| Vancomycin | 0.38 |
-),(-−), nNo growth.
The limited capacity of the utilization of carbohydrates is also suggested by the apparently limited range of sugar transporters encoded by this strain. Strain He02T carries an incomplete and thus non-functional, phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), an important bacterial sugar transport system involved in the transport of a multitude of substrates [38]. He02T showed the absence of a ptsI gene in its genome, encoding the phosphocarrier protein enzyme I, while it had a ptsH gene (locus R4Y45_05695), encoding the histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr of the PTS. It also encoded a few IIA (locus R4Y45_02965) and IIC (loci R4Y45_00085, R4Y45_00770, R4Y45_00775, R4Y45_05800 and R4Y45_06540) sugar-specific components of PTS transporters, although they appear incomplete or as remnants and did not seem to conform functional PTSs (Fig. S5). The inspection of the genome of H. floricola DSM 23037T showed that these characteristics (e.g. the absence of ptsI but the presence of ptsH gene from the PTS) were also shared with that species, which has also been shown to only utilize glucose and fructose from a battery of 14 sugars tested [5]. The analysis of ABC transporters also evidenced the absence of characterized carbohydrate ABC transporters (Fig. S6). According to this, the search for carbohydrate-active enzymes present in the He02T genome using dbCAN3 [33] only revealed the presence of three putative enzymes showing glycosylhydrolase domains from the GH73 and GH32 families: genes R4Y45_02055 and R4Y45_05890. Both enzymes contain signal peptides as predicted by SignalP-6.0 [39], indicating that they are possibly extracellular enzymes involved in cell wall turnover (endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases). In addition, strain He02T encodes a putative invertase (R4Y45_02190). This enzyme lacks a signal peptide as predicted by SignalP-6.0, suggesting that it is an intracellular enzyme. The apparent absence of sucrose transporters would account for the inability of He02T to grow on sucrose.
The analysis of pyruvate catabolic pathways showed that strain He02T lacks alternative pathways to lactate dehydrogenase such as pyruvate dehydrogenase, pyruvate:formate lyase or pyruvate oxidase (Fig. S7). Of note, as many other LAB, strain He02T encodes a putative malolactic enzyme (R4Y45_05065) that would let it use malic acid as a source of metabolic energy [40]. Strain He02T also encode putative phosphate acetyltransferase and acetate kinase (R4Y45_03230 and R4Y45_03335, respectively) that would let it obtain ATP from acetyl-CoA.
Amino acid metabolism
The analysis of the genome suggests that H. saturejae He02T requires a number of amino acids. Strain He02T encodes putative ABC transporters for Arg, Asp, Cystine, Gln, Glu, His and Lys in addition to an Opp oligopeptide ABC transporter (Fig. S6). The inspection of the metabolic pathways suggests that strain He02T can interconvert Asp and Asn and Glu and Gln, respectively (Fig. S8), and can synthesize Gly, Ser and Thr from Asp (Fig. S9). Furthermore, strain He02T encodes the genes required to synthesize Met from Asp, providing that a source of sulphur such as thiosulfate or hydrogen sulphide is available, whereas it cannot possibly synthesize Cys (Fig. S10). The pathway for Lys biosynthesis from Asp is also present (Fig. S11). In contrast, biosynthetic pathways for Ala, Arg, aromatic amino acids (Phe, Trp and Tyr), branched-chain amino acids (Leu, Ile and Val) and Pro are incomplete or absent.
The presence of oligopeptide transporters suggests that strain He02T may obtain essential amino acids from internalized peptides that are subsequently hydrolysed by intracellular peptidases. In fact, strain He02T encodes a varied array of aminopeptidases and endopeptidases (Table S2). In contrast, strain He02T does not encode any cell envelope proteinases (CEPs), which are a key component of the proteolytic system in other LAB [41]. CEPs break extracellular proteins into peptides that are subsequently uptaken and degraded by intracellular peptidases. The absence of these proteinases suggests that H. saturejae relies on the proteolytic activities of other organisms present in its habitat.
Secondary metabolism
Analysis of secondary metabolism identified a remnant of a putative bacteriocin cluster consisting of an N-terminal truncated sensor histidine kinase (CitA, COG3290; R4Y45_RS01320), a LytR/AlgR family response regulator (R4Y45_RS01325; COG3279) and C-t terminal putative peptidase-containing ABC-type bacteriocin transporter (R4Y45_RS01330; SunT, COG2274). This cluster is also present in H. floricola, although both the histidine kinase and the ABC transporter are apparently intact in this genome. Comparison with other LAB-encoding homologous genes indicate that key genes such as those encoding bacteriocin-like peptides and immunity proteins are missing in strain He02T (Fig. S12) and H. floricola.
The analysis also identified two genes putatively involved in terpene metabolism: a putative phytoene synthase (R4Y45_02165; COG1562) and a putative phytoene desaturase (R4Y45_02170; COG1233). Since strain He02T possesses a complete terpenoid backbone biosynthesis pathway (Fig. S13), these genes might produce a carotenoid pigment from farnesyl diphosphate that would account for the yellow pigmentation of He02T cells (see below).
No antibiotic-producing pathways or mobilizable antibiotic resistance genes were detected in the genome of strain He02T. Resistance to antibiotics was also assayed by using ETEST® strips (bioMérieux) deposited onto MRS agar plates overlayed with MRS soft agar (0.8% w/v) containing He02T cells at an OD595 of 0.2. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. The strips provide a predefined antibiotic gradient that is used to determine the MIC. Strain He02T was resistant to gentamycin and kanamycin, whereas it was sensitive to ampicillin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, tetracycline and vancomycin (Table 1). Intrinsic resistance to aminoglycosides, including gentamycin and kanamycin, is common in Lactobacillaceae [42,43], which may account for the resistance observed in the absence of specific resistance genes.
On the other hand, two putative multidrug ABC exporter-encoding genes (R4Y45_00495 and R4Y45_00500; MdlB superfamily, COG1132) were identified. In addition, a putative antimicrobial resistance gene cluster belonging to the Bce-like family was identified. Bce-like systems, named after the BceRSAB system from Bacillus subtilis, are involved in resistance against a number of antimicrobial peptides [44,45]. They typically consist of a two-component regulatory system and a cognate ABC transporter. In strain He02T, genes R4Y45_05675, R4Y45_05680 and R4Y45_05685 encode a putative ABC ATPase subunit, a response regulator and a sensor histidine kinase, respectively. Gene R4Y45_05675 encode a hypothetical membrane protein. blast searches against Lacticaseibacillus paracasei BL23, which encode two BceRSAB systems (ApsRSAB and PsdRSAB) and an additional Bce-like ABC transporter (DerAB) previously characterized [46,47], revealed that proteins with highest scores corresponded to the Bce proteins encoded by this organism (Table S3). The best scores for genes R4Y45_05675, R4Y45_05680 and R4Y45_05685 were registered with their Aps counterparts. Furthermore, both clusters shared the same structure (Fig. S14). In contrast, no significant hit in Lc. paracasei BL23 was found for gene R4Y45_05670. No conserved motif is recognized in this protein. However, the analysis con TOPCONS [48] predicts that the protein contains ten transmembrane helices and BlastP searches find significant hits with proteins annotated as ABC permeases such as YybP from Amyloactobacillus (WP_056945950; 100% coverage, 21.95% identical residues) and LolE from Sutcliffiella halmapala (WP_169864955; 99% coverage; 22.65% identical residues). These results suggest that R4Y45_05670 might constitute a functional ABC transporter together with R4Y45_05675.
In summary, the analysis of the genome sequence indicates that H. saturejae He02T has limited metabolic capabilities, relying mostly on homofermentative fermentation of monosaccharides as an energy source. Like other LAB, H. saturejae requires a number of amino acids that may possibly be obtained mainly from the hydrolysis of uptaken extracellular peptides. Of note, its capacity to produce a carotenoid pigment may be a photoprotective mechanism against sunlight exposure in flowers.
Growth characteristics of H. saturejae
When cultivated in MRS (BD Difco), a general medium for LAB, H. saturejae He02T grew as non-motile short rods (1.67±0.32 µm×0.92±0.11 µm), typically occurring in pairs (Fig. 3). Pelleted cells are pale yellow although this characteristic is not perceptible in colonies due to their small size. Growth in liquid MRS (pH 6.5) at 30 °C was slow (growth rate of 0.041±0.002 h−1 and a final OD600nm of 0.30±0.03 after 24 h) and sharply decreased when the pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.5 (growth rate of 0.002±0.001 h−1), with no growth occurring at pH 4.5 (Table 1). The presence of 0.5% NaCl (w/v) enhanced growth compared to MRS alone (growth rate of 0.070±0.007 h−1 and final OD600nm of 0.41±0.06), but growth was reduced at 1% NaCl (w/v) and absent at 2% NaCl (w/v). Growth was observed at 15 °C after 48 h of incubation, but not at 42 °C. Strain He02T displayed a homofermentative metabolism, and despite being isolated in FYP medium, designed for the isolation of fructophilic LAB [8], it did not show a fructophilic behaviour, and it grew faster when the carbon source of this medium (fructose) was replaced by glucose (GYP medium; Table 1). Strain He02T grew poorly under aerobic (air) conditions, whereas limiting the oxygen in the liquid growth medium by the addition of Oxyrase (Merck) enhanced growth (Table 1). Supplementation of the growth medium with pyruvate did not affect growth parameters (Table 1).
Fig. 3. Microscopy images of H. saturejae He02T cultured in MRS medium. (a) 40× magnification. (b) 100× magnification.
Strain He02T possessed a very limited range of the utilization of carbohydrate substrates and only glucose and fructose tested positive from the 49 carbohydrates present in API50 CH galleries. The narrow range of utilized carbohydrates appears to be a characteristic of the Holzapfeliella genus and probably reflects the adaptation of these bacteria and other niche-related LAB, such as fructophilic LAB [3], to proliferate in very specialized niches like the nectar of flowers, which are rich in fermentable sugars but possess a limited variety of them.
Based on the phylogenetic analyses, ANI and dDDH low values compared to the closest species, H. floricola, we conclude that strain He02T constitute a new species, for which the name Holzapfeliella saturejae sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is He02T (=CECT 31001T=DSM 117324T=CCM 9395T), isolated from flowers of S. montana L.
Description of Holzapfeliella saturejae sp. nov.
Holzapfeliella saturejae (sa.tu.re’jae. N.L. fem. n. saturejae, named after the plant genus Satureja).
Cells are homofermentative, Gram-stain-positive, catalase-negative, non-motile, short rod-shaped and typically occur in pairs. They grow in MRS broth in anaerobic, micro-aerobic or aerobic conditions, although growth is stimulated in anaerobiosis. It can grow at 15 °C but not at 42 °C. It grows poorly at pH 5.5 and not at pH 4.5. It tolerates NaCl concentration in MRS broth up to 1%, with optimal growth attained with 0.5% NaCl. On MRS agar plates, H. saturejae formed round and smooth colonies that were translucent and less than 1 mm in diameter after 2 days of growth at 30 °C. H. saturejae only fermented glucose and fructose. Using the API50 CH test kit, it cannot ferment glycerol, erythritol, d-arabinose, l-arabinose, d-ribose, d-xylose, l-xylose, d-adonitol, methyl β-d-xylopyranoside, d-galactose, d-mannose, l-sorbose, l-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, d-mannitol, d-sorbitol, methyl d-mannopyranoside, methyl α-d-glucopyranoside, N-acetyl-glucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, aesculin, salicin, d-cellobiose, d-maltose, d-lactose, d-melibiose, d-saccharose, d-trehalose, inulin, d-melezitose, d-raffinose, starch, glycogen, xylitol, gentiobiose, d-turanose, d-lyxose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, l-arabitol, gluconate, 2-keto-gluconate or 5-keto-gluconate.
The type strain He02T (=CECT 31001T=DSM 117324T=CCM 9395T) was isolated from S. montana L. (Lamiaceae) flowers. It has a G+C content of 34.99 mol%. The GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA gene and the genome assembly of He02T are OR978308 and JAWMWG000000000, respectively.
supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The Accreditation of the IATA as Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa CEX2021-001189-S funded by MCIU/AEI is fully acknowledged.
Abbreviations
- ANI
average nucleotide identity
- CEPs
cell envelope proteinases
- dDDH
digital DNA–DNA hybridization
- LAB
lactic acid bacteria
- MRS
man, rogosa and sharpe
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- PTS
phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system
Footnotes
Funding: This work was partially financed by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidadades, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Spain, through project PID2020-11960RB-I00.
GenBank accession no.: The GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain He02T (=CECT 31001T=DSM 117324T=CCM 9395T) is OR978308. The GenBank accession number for the genome sequence of strain He02T is JAWMWG000000000.
Contributor Information
Cristina Alcántara, Email: crisalba@iata.csic.es.
Ángela Peirotén, Email: angela.peiroten@inia.csic.es.
Luís Andrés Ramón-Núñez, Email: ramon_luinun@gva.es.
José María Landete, Email: landete.josem@inia.csic.es.
Vicente Monedero, Email: btcmon@iata.csic.es.
Manuel Zúñiga, Email: btcman@iata.csic.es.
References
- 1.Orozco-Mosqueda M del C, Rocha-Granados M del C, Glick BR, Santoyo G. Microbiome engineering to improve biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms. Microbiol Res. 2018;208:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu AO, Leveau JHJ, Marco ML. Abundance, diversity and plant-specific adaptations of plant-associated lactic acid bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2020;12:16–29. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Endo A, Maeno S, Tanizawa Y, Kneifel W, Arita M, et al. Fructophilic lactic acid bacteria, a unique group of fructose-fermenting microbes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:e01290–01218. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01290-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Konno N, Maeno S, Tanizawa Y, Arita M, Endo A, et al. Evolutionary paths toward multi-level convergence of lactic acid bacteria in fructose-rich environments. Commun Biol . 2024;7:902. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06580-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kawasaki S, Kurosawa K, Miyazaki M, Yagi C, Kitajima Y, et al. Lactobacillus floricola sp. nov., lactic acid bacteria isolated from mountain flowers. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:1356–1359. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.022988-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deshmukh UB, Oren A. Proposal of Holzapfeliella gen. nov. and Litorivicinus gen. nov. as replacement names for the illegitimate prokaryotic generic names Holzapfelia Zheng et al. 2020 and Litoricola Kim et al. 2007, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73:005688. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Endo A, Futagawa-Endo Y, Dicks LMT. Isolation and characterization of fructophilic lactic acid bacteria from fructose-rich niches. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009;32:593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lane DJ. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. New York: Wiley; 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1188–1195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parente E, Zotta T, Giavalisco M, Ricciardi A. Metataxonomic insights in the distribution of Lactobacillaceae in foods and food environments. Int J Food Microbiol. 2023;391–393:110124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genomic data quality and beyond. Curr Protoc. 2021;1:e323. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Community TG. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tian R, Imanian B. VBCG: 20 validated bacterial core genes for phylogenomic analysis with high fidelity and resolution. Microbiome. 2023;11:247. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01705-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Le SQ, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1307–1320. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W484–W492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Lau BY, Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group. et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W30–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D32–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wishart DS, Han S, Saha S, Oler E, Peters H, et al. PHASTEST: faster than PHASTER, better than PHAST. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W443–W450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. lastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zheng J, Ge Q, Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang L, et al. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W115–W121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J, et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W246–W251. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gschwind R, Ugarcina Perovic S, Weiss M, Petitjean M, Lao J, et al. ResFinderFG v2.0: a database of antibiotic resistance genes obtained by functional metagenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W493–W500. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mungan MD, Alanjary M, Blin K, Weber T, Medema MH, et al. ARTS 2.0: feature updates and expansion of the Antibiotic Resistant Target Seeker for comparative genome mining. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:W546–W552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, et al. AntiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W46–W50. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jeckelmann J-M, Erni B. In: Bacterial Cell Walls and Membranes. Kuhn A, editor. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. Carbohydrate transport by group translocation: the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system; pp. 223–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Teufel F, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Johansen AR, Gíslason MH, Pihl SI, et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1023–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cox DJ, Henick-Kling T. Chemiosmotic energy from malolactic fermentation. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:5750–5752. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.10.5750-5752.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Savijoki K, Ingmer H, Varmanen P. Proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;71:394–406. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0427-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dušková M, Morávková M, Mrázek J, Florianová M, Vorlová L, et al. Assessment of antibiotic resistance in starter and non-starter lactobacilli of food origin. Acta Vet Brno. 2020;89:401–411. doi: 10.2754/avb202089040401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nawaz M, Wang J, Zhou A, Ma C, Wu X, et al. Characterization and transfer of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from fermented food products. Curr Microbiol. 2011;62:1081–1089. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9856-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.George NL, Bennett EC, Orlando BJ. Guarding the walls: the multifaceted roles of Bce modules in cell envelope stress sensing and antimicrobial resistance. J Bacteriol. 2024;206:e0012324. doi: 10.1128/jb.00123-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Revilla-Guarinos A, Gebhard S, Mascher T, Zúñiga M. Defence against antimicrobial peptides: different strategies in Firmicutes. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:1225–1237. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Revilla-Guarinos A, Gebhard S, Alcántara C, Staron A, Mascher T, et al. Characterization of a regulatory network of peptide antibiotic detoxification modules in Lactobacillus casei BL23. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:3160–3170. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00178-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Revilla-Guarinos A, Zhang Q, Loderer C, Alcántara C, Müller A, et al. ABC Transporter DerAB of Lactobacillus casei mediates resistance against insect-derived defensins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e00818–00820. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00818-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tsirigos KD, Peters C, Shu N, Käll L, Elofsson A. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W401–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



