Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317003

A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, China

Lu Wang 1, Yakun He 2,*, Zhonghai Yu 1, Hongrui Wang 3, Wenjuan Ye 4, Xin Li 1, Yingping Liu 1, Junxiao Zhang 5
Editor: Mohamed R Abonazel6
PMCID: PMC11753656  PMID: 39841653

Abstract

The "food desert" problem has been treated under a national strategy in the United States and other countries. At present, there is little research on the phenomenon of "food desert" in China. This study takes Shanghai as the research area and proposes a multiscale analysis method using a linear tessellation model that splits the street network into homogeneous linear units. Firstly, the network kernel density estimation using a linear tessellation model is used to measure the travel-mode-based food accessibility. Considering the actual travel constraints, the GPS trajectory data of four travel modes (walking, bicycle, metro and taxi) are applied to calculate the speed of each linear unit. Secondly, the “food desert” phenomenon in Shanghai are identified combing with the results of the network K-function. Finally, the resident income conditions in different modes are fitted based on the housing price data and the spatial distribution of four "food desert" patterns are detected by the overlay analysis of food accessibility and resident income conditions. The experimental results show that fifty percent of Shanghai is characterized by low food accessibility, and half of these areas are disadvantaged and low-income areas in suburbs, which are the locations experiencing the “food desert” phenomenon. Comparing the results of the proposed method and that of the traditional planar method, the identification results for all modes based on the traditional planar method underestimate the severity of the “food desert”, especially for the bicycle and taxi modes. This study also provides corresponding decision-making reference for the alleviation and resolution of “food desert” issues. Moreover, the proposed method provides a new research perspective for urban research under the street network space.

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

According to the research of U.S. Department of Agriculture, limited access to healthy food and poor diet are the major pathogeneses of obesity, heart disease and related chronic diseases and thus have attracted the attention of the government and the public [1, 2]. More and more urban planners and geographic analysts have studied the relationships between food access, neighborhood socioeconomics and public health [35].

In the middle of 1990s, researchers defined “food desert” as the area where the inhabitants have limited access to healthy and affordable food within a certain distance due to the lack of adequate healthy food outlets [6]. From this perspective, the inherent characteristic of "food desert" is spatial. Many researches have started concentrating on phenomenon and defining the area of poor food access [7, 8]. With the advancement of data acquisition capabilities and computing capabilities, the actual conditions such as transportation systems and space-time constraints can be observed and quantified. This makes it necessary to develop more reliable and more fine-grained measures to measure healthy food accessibility.

The "food desert" problem has been treated under a national strategy in many countries worldwide. In the field of urban study, many researches have investigated the "food desert" problem and related social inequality in developed countries [912]. At present, there is little research on the phenomenon of "food desert" in China [13].

1.2 Literature review

Most previous studies have focused on exploring “food desert” by analyzing the following four regional characteristics: (1) access to food stores [13, 14]; (2) regional racial/ethnic differences [15, 16]; (3) regional income/social-economic status [17, 18]; (4) differences in store types and food supply [19, 20]. There is no agreement on how to identify the “food desert”, but food accessibility analysis has always been the preferred method because of its quantitative characteristics [21]. The traditional methods for accessibility analysis of food accessibility consist of density-based methods and proximity-based methods [22].

The density-based methods quantify the accessibility of food outlets with total count, count per population or count per square area using the buffer method, kernel density estimation (KDE) or spatial clustering. As one of the most common methods for measuring the first-order effects of a spatial process in spatial point patterns, the KDE method is a recommended geographic method for establishing access to amenities in health research [23]. This method can transform the distribution of point events into continuous surfaces with a quartic kernel and an adaptive bandwidth, and examine the intensity trend of events in space, and it has been applied to studies of food access [24]. Numerous researchers utilize KDE to measure the density of various food outlets to assess the food environment around homes, work sites, schools and other destinations [3, 4, 2426]. Then, the disparities in the food environment are analyzed based on the KDE results and selected neighborhood characteristics, such as poverty rates, unemployment rates, vehicle ownership rates, public transit access, and other socio-economic indicators [26]. Conforming to Tobler’s First Law [27], the KDE method not only takes the number of features nearby into account, but also applies a weighting function so that the weight of the nearest facility is greater than that of more distant facilities [28].

As a well-known method of second-order effects in spatial point patterns used to examine the correlation and independency of point features, the K-function statistical method is also applied to measure food environment [23, 29]. Based on this method, Austin et al. [30] and Day et al. [31] examine the clustering of fast-food restaurants in areas proximal to schools to characterize schools’ neighborhood food environments. Furthermore, Costa et al. [32] measure access to commercial fruit and vegetable establishments with KDE and the K-function. Most studies regard the block or neighborhood as the basic unit when applying these methods, which may lead to the edge effects by restricting human activities within established administrative units [24, 25, 3335]. Furthermore, these results possibly neglect differences in accessibility within the same administrative unit and increase distortion of the estimation [36]. To address this issue, geographic grids have been utilized to refine the analysis unit [37]. They have two advantages: (1) the geographic grid structure can describe data distribution more accurately; (2) the size of each grid unit can be adjusted to satisfy different analysis demands and analysis factors. Nevertheless, the abovementioned methods regard the region as homogeneous and isotropic Euclidean space, ignoring the fact that human activities are restricted to street network space [38]. This may result in an inaccurate estimation of accessibility between the study region and food outlets because of the false cluster patterns in planar space [39].

Aiming at solving the problems above, proximity has been proposed to estimate the “food desert” phenomenon by the distance or the travel time between food outlets and the study region with the network analysis model [40]. Based on this model, many scholars analyze the food environment of the study unit by measuring the shortest network distance between the centroid of the study unit and the nearest food outlets [41]. However, for numerous reasons, people do not always acquire food from the closest stores [42]. Burns and Inglis [43] utilized the same method to conduct a comprehensive analysis according to the traffic modes, road types and other characteristics of the traffic network (i.e., the frequency of buses). Nevertheless, the above studies treated each road as a homogeneous geometry arc with fixed length [44]. Abundant data enriches the factors considered in food accessibility analysis, such as real-time travel burden [45], transport costs [46], transport modes [13], and the accessibility of transportation [47]. Although these studies provided a better description of food accessibility, they still remained at administrative level analysis, failing to measure the accurate individual accessibility.

Combining the characteristics of the KDE method and the network analysis model, the network KDE method was developed by Borruso [48] to calculate the density based on the shortest network distances. It can identify the aggregation of network-constrained phenomena more accurately. Tang et al. [28] applied network KDE to analyze the space–time distribution of taxis’ pick-up events. Referring to planar K function, Okabe and Yamada [49] proposed the network K-function. Yamada and Thrill [50] proved that planar K-function analysis is problematic because it entails a significant chance of over detecting clustered patterns by comparing the results based on the network and planar K-function methods. Enlightened by network-based methods, researchers have made efforts to analyze network-constrained point events under network space instead of planar space, such as retail stores [51], traffic accidents [36], crime [52] and other events associated with economic activities [38].

In addition to poor food accessibility, low income is a basic characteristic of “food desert” areas. Because, it has been widely utilized ‘‘food desert” to describe areas where low-income residents do not have access to healthy and affordable food [1, 7]. Based on this description, the areas are identified as food deserts if they meet both low-income and low-food-access criterion in many studies [53, 54].

Based on the above analysis, the geographic grid structure can be adjusted to satisfy different analysis demands and analysis factors. The network arc structure can make the accessibility analysis fully consider that human activities rely on connections in the traffic network and is limited by the space-time constraints of the street network [55]. In order to combine the advantages of the above two methods, this study proposes a linear tessellation model to measure fine-grained accessibility in street network space. In traditional Euclidean space, the raster data divides the planar space into continuous regular cells based on the field theory, and the analysis scale is controlled by adjusting the size of regular grids. Similarly, the proposed linear tessellation model splits the street network into homogeneous linear units and the analysis scale of the network is also adjusted by setting the units’ length which makes solving issues at a fine-grained scale possible [56].

1.3 Study objective

Based on the proposed linear tessellation model, this study attempts to: (1) introducing the network Kernel Density Estimation analysis method into the linear tessellation model to measure transit-varying food accessibility in Shanghai with trajectory data; (2) applying the network K-function method to analyze the estimated food accessibility from the perspective of food outlets’ distribution pattern; (3) identifying the "food desert" areas by the food accessibility and income and discussing the implications for urban planning. The proposed model aims to provide an innovative thought with a rational analysis space for food acquirement issue, and to provide reasonable implications for public policymakers by exploring the state of “food desert” at a finer size.

In the next section, we demonstrate materials and methods of “food desert” identification based on the linear tessellation model. Then, our experimental results and discussions are presented in Section 3. Finally, Section 5 concludes this paper and summary the innovations and limitations in our study.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area and data

Shanghai’s rapid urbanization and expansion have been affecting the communication, travel, work and lifestyles of millions of residents. It displays the positive and negative outcomes of urban growth, which makes it a typical place for diverse urban research [57].

To apply the proposed method to identify the food accessibility in the Shanghai region as shown in Fig 1(A), where the urban center and urban fringe area is within the red line and blue line, respectively, the remaining area is suburb.

Fig 1. The Shanghai region.

Fig 1

(a) presents the districts and planning of study area, where the black line refers to city boundary of Shanghai, the grey line refers to district boundary, the area inside the red line is urban center, the area outside the red line and inside the blue line is urban fringe, the remaining area is suburb. (b) presents the study data, where the green points refer to the food outlets, the grey lines refer to the road network, the illustration in the lower right corner shows metro lines. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

The study data are as follows:

  1. Healthy food retail outlets. We obtained 12,419 records of the food retail outlets via the Baidu API (http://lbsyun.baidu.com/index.php?title=webapi/guide/webservice-placeapi), including full-service supermarket chains, fresh markets, sea food stores, fruit and vegetable grocery stores [13], as shown in the green points in Fig 1(B);

  2. Entire road networks. These data are downloaded from OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/), as shown in the grey lines in Fig 1(B);

  3. House price Point of Interests (POIs). These data are obtained from the houses put up for sale in the Lianjia website (https://lianjia.com/) in March, 2017. The total number of points is 91,619.

  4. Trajectory data. Allowing for the travel mode of residents and low ownership rate for private cars, four types of trajectory data, walk, bicycle, metro and taxi, are selected to calculate the average speed of each road segment for the corresponding travel mode. The estimated speed of the walk, bicycle, taxi and metro mode is shown in Fig 2(A)–2(D), respectively.

Fig 2. The speed map of the four transport modes calculated from the trajectory data in road network.

Fig 2

(a) presents the average speed of each road segment for the walk mod, where the speed values range from 0.0003 to 1.912. (b) presents the average speed of each road segment for the bicycle mode, where the speed values range from 0.004 to 15.540. (c) presents the average speed of each road segment for the taxi mode, where the speed values range from 0.056 to 324.368. (d) presents the average speed of each road segment for the metro mode, where the speed values range from 0.0003 to 10.000. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

GPS trajectory data of walk and bicycle are obtained from Yidong GPS APP (http://edooon.com/app/gps/). GPS trajectory data for taxi are obtained from SODA (Shanghai Open Data Apps, http://shanghai.sodachallenges.com/data.html). All the GPS trajectory data are in the same time period (March 1 to 31, 2017). The speed of metro mode is set based on the average speed of 14 metro lines in Shanghai, as shown in the illustration in the lower right corner of Fig 1(B). The average speed of 14 metro lines is calculated according to the total metro lines’ length provided by the Shanghai Survey and Mapping Institute (https://www.shsmi.cn/) and the total metro operation time provided by the Shanghai Metro official website (http://www.shmetro.com/).

The house price POIs data and trajectory data are selected from the same time period, which ensures the effectiveness and reliability of our study. The location attribute of house price POIs contributes to obtain finer-scale characteristics of resident instead of the characteristics of whole administrative units. And the trajectory data has ability to show real-time traffic conditions of each road segments with calculated speed, further to simulate space-time constraints encountered by humans in the road networks.

2.2 Methods

The identification of “food desert” based on the linear tessellation model can be divided into five steps: (1) generation of the linear tessellation model based on four transport modes trajectory data and road network data; (2) measurement of food accessibility by the network KDE method based on the established linear tessellation model; (3) analysis of food environment from the perspective of food outlets’ distribution pattern by the network K-function method based on the established linear tessellation model; (4) calculation of resident income from house price with the housing price income ratio indicator; (5) identification of “food desert” areas with both low accessibility and low income criterion. The general process is descripted in Fig 3.

Fig 3. Overall framework for identification of “food desert” areas.

Fig 3

The black flowlines refer to step (1), the blue flowlines refer to step (2), the orange flowlines refer to step (3), the purple flowline refers to step (4), and the red flowlines refer to step (5).

2.2.1 Linear tessellation model

For traditional Euclidean space, the raster data divides the plane into continuous regular cells based on the field theory. The value of each cell and the neighborhood relationship among the cells are recorded in the planar tessellation model of raster data, which enables efficient spatial analysis in the planar space. This method can also be applied to the network space. The linear tessellation model is proposed to split the street network into a set of homogeneous basic linear units with adjustable length according to the analysis factors. Then, a linear reference system is generated using basic linear units and the topological relationship (including the adjacency relation between linear units and the inclusion relation between the intersections of adjacent basic linear units and linear units), where the distribution law of events within network space can be explored using the basic linear unit as analysis unit.

In Euclidean space, the analysis scale is controlled by adjusting the size of regular grids. By analogy, the analysis scale of the network space is also adjusted by setting the length (namely, the basic linear unit length of an arc), which depends on the defined length and the weight of partition. The form of partition length is:

Li=lefi (1)

where Li is the length of basic unit for ith road; le is the defined length; fi is the weight function.

To better simulate human behavior in the network space, each road segment receives different speed-based weight values in term of the corresponding transport mode and real-time speed. Therefore, the weight function fi can be represented as:

fi={vilevi>0vminlevi=0 (2)

where vi is the average speed (m/s) of the ith road; and vmin is the minimum speed (m/s) in human travel. The average speed of each road segment is calculated by trajectory data with Kalman filtering method [58]. Because Kalman filter can estimate the position and speed of a vehicle from a series of incomplete and noisy data, which makes it an optimal estimation method and is widely used in the field of automatic driving. Based on this speed-based weight, the road network is divided into a series of isochronous basic units with varying lengths, where each basic unit represents 1 second.

2.2.2 Network kernel density estimation method based on the linear tessellation model

The KDE is a spatial smoothing method employed to transform a sample of geographically referenced point data (e.g., address of food outlets) into a smooth continuous surface to estimate the “intensity of referenced points across a surface, by calculating the overall number of cases situated within a given search radius from a target point” [59]. Compared to other analysis methods, the KDE method can calculate the density at any position in the study region [23]. It can also visualize the phenomenon by means of a smooth and three-dimensional continuous surface, in which peaks represent the presence of clusters or ‘hot spots’ in the distribution of events (e.g., food outlet POIs), and any position will have higher density if it is at a shorter distance from the POIs. This method holds characteristics of Tobler’s first law of geography [48], which makes it conform to the influence mode of events with distance decay. Applying all the advantages of the KDE method to calculate event accessibility, the general formula is expressed as:

A(s)=λ^(s)=i=1n1τ2k(x)x=sciτ (3)

where A(s) is event accessibility value at position s; λ^(s) is the estimated density value at position s; k(x) is a weight function; ci is the ith event point; sci is the distance between event point ci and position s; τ is bandwidth; and n is total number of event points under concern.

Assuming that the Euclidean space is continuous, homogeneous and isotropic, the traditional planar KDE method utilizes a weight function for any location with identical properties based on the Euclidean distance measurement [38]. It is easy to neglect spatial heterogeneity and network constraints, resulting in overestimate for network-constrained event accessibility [51]. Given abovementioned problems, the network KDE method applied to the linear tessellation model provides an urban environment analysis with a more fine-grained level, as shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4. Comparison between planar KDE method and network KDE method.

Fig 4

(a) presents the result of planar KDE method, where the darker the grid, the higher the KDE value. (b) presents the result of network KDE method, where the thicker the basic linear unit, the higher the KDE value. The areas within the dashed lines represent the service area of the event points.

The network KDE method is an application of the KDE method for network space. Therefore, the Eq 3 is applicable to the density calculation both of the network and planar KDE method. However, instead of the Euclidean distance measurement in planar method, the bandwidth and weight function are calculated by the shortest-path distance in network method. Considering that the proposed linear tessellation model has divided the road networks into a series of basic units with equal value (e.g., equal length and equal time), the bandwidth is transformed to the number of linear basic units as the threshold of search steps in the calculation. We utilize step-by-step expansion from the source linear unit projected by each event point to all directions of network space based on the topological relationship to search for the linear units within the threshold. And the shortest-path distance refers to the network distance between the centers of the two linear units along the corresponding expansion direction.

Therefore, the detailed procedure of network KDE method based on linear tessellation model is presented as follows:

  1. Assign the event POIs (such as food outlet POIs) into the nearest basic linear unit in Euclidean distance, and define these basic linear units as the source basic linear units;

  2. Expand the ith source basic linear unit by querying for the neighbouring basic linear units via adjacent node step by step, record the step frequency of each basic unit, expanding from source unit as the distance between them within step τ.

  3. Calculate the density of each basic unit according to Eq 3 within step τ.

  4. Expand all source basic linear units by repeating procedures (2) and (3) and use the sum of density calculated in each expanding process as accessibility for each basic unit.

Fig 5 shows the detailed process of search and calculation for one event point in the case of Fig 4(B), where the basic units are equal length of 10m, the number of search steps is 3. Firstly, the event point is assigned into the basic linear unit o as the source unit, as presented in Fig 5(A). Then, expand the 1st step from source linear unit o by querying for its neighboring linear units. It is easy to obtain the units a and b, which are marked in Fig 5(B). Record the step frequency as 1 and the shortest-path distance to unit o as 10m for units a and b. In the second step of expansion, the linear units c and d (Fig 5(C)) can be searched by querying for the neighbors of units a and b with 1 step frequency, respectively. Record the step frequency as 2 and the shortest-path distance to unit o as 20m for units c and d. With the same operation, as displayed in Fig 5(D), the units e, f, g and h can be obtained in the last step of expansion, where their step frequency is recorded as 3, and the shortest-path distance to unit o is 30m. According to Eq 3, calculate the density of units a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h.

Fig 5. The calculation procedure of the network KDE method based on linear tessellation model.

Fig 5

(a) presents the determination of the source basic linear unit. (b) presents the first step of expansion. (c) presents the second step of expansion. (d) presents the third step of expansion.

In the network KDE analysis based on the linear tessellation model, the description for accessibility does not depend on traditional shortest path analysis, and it consists of all possibilities to acquiring food related to the density of both the food outlets and the road network.

It is generally agreed that the selection of the bandwidth value is vital for KDE analysis in terms of determining the appropriate spatial scale for different circumstances, and this value affects the statistical results by determining the smoothness of the KDE value [38, 48, 51]. Similarly, for parameter setting in network KDE method based on proposed linear tessellation model, the threshold of search steps is more important than weight function k(x). Therefore, a quartic function is adopted as the weight function in our experiments of the planar method and the network method, which is often utilized for density calculation. The formula is as follows:

k(x)=34(1x2)x=sciτ (4)

Table 1 shows the setting of bandwidth of planar and network KDE method in four transport modes. Applying the KDE method to identify the “food desert”, we define the area vulnerable to the phenomenon of low food accessibility: >30 min (walking), >15 min (bicycle), >10 min (taxi), and >20 min (metro) on the strength of the definition of “food desert” and the international standard for public facilities accessibility (Community Guide http://archived.naccho.org/topics/HPDP/commguide/) [13]. Based on the generated linear tessellation with isochronous units in section 2.2.1, the threshold of search steps in network method is represented by the limited time standard, which are 1800, 900, 600 and 1200 for walk, bicycle, taxi and metro mode, respectively. Then the length of bandwidth in network method is the maximum of all shortest-path distance from the source linear units to the units within threshold, which varies with the different event points and transport modes. Therefore, we utilize the time standard to express the bandwidth for network method. In line with the bandwidth of the network KDE analysis, the selection of bandwidth in the planar KDE analysis depends on the corresponding average speed and limited time of the four travel modes in the network. Additionally, to ensure the experiment efficiency and sufficient granularity of the results, we selected 100m as the defined length and the average speed of the walk mode, 0.8m/s, as vmin for the linear tessellation model after several rounds of experiments.

Table 1. Parameters of KDE analysis in planar and network methods.
travel mode average speed (m/s) bandwidth
planar (m) network (s)
walk 0.8 1440 1800
bicycle 3.6 3240 900
taxi 4.3 2580 600
metro 1.1 1320 1200

2.2.3 Network K-function analysis method

The K-function analysis method is regarded as one of the most effective and most widely applied methods in point pattern analysis because it examines point patterns at various spatial scales in consideration of all event–event distances rather than the distance from the nearest point [29]. This method can accurately identify the geographical level at which the points are most significantly clustered or dispersed. Making allowances for the spatial point events related to human activities that are constrained by a road network in real life, Okabe and Yamada [49] propose the network K-function method, an extension of the planar K-function.

As defined, for a set of points P = {p1,p2,L,pn} distributed on street network LT with length of lT, the expected network K-function under complete spatial randomness (CSR) [60] can be defined as:

KExp(h)=1ρE(h,P,LT) (5)

where h is the density of points in LT, calculated by ρ = n/lT; E(h,P,LT) is the expected number of points within network distance h to a point in P on LT. The expected number of points within h to a point in P over network LT is estimated under a Poisson process.

The observed network K-function of place pi represented as following formula:

KObs(h)=1ρi=1nN(h,pi,LTi(h))n (6)

where LTi(h) is the subset of the network that consists of point within a network distance h of pi in P; N(h,pi,LTi(h)) is the total number of points in the subset LTi(h).

To describe the distribution of the n points in the network, Monte Carlo simulations are performed to generate a series of random distributions of n points to obtain KExp(h) value and the upper and lower envelopes of CRS for a given network. If KObs(h) is in the range of the CSR, the point set P is in a random distribution, where each point has an equal opportunity to occur at any location in the network; the presence of one point at a certain location does not impact the probability of other points occurring at any location in the network. If KObs(h) is above the upper envelope of CSR, the point set P is in a clustered distribution. If KObs(h) is below the lower envelope of CSR, the point set P is in a dispersed distribution.

For the estimation of the planar and network K-function and their statistical significance, two widely used software packages were utilized: the Spatstat of R language for the planar K-function [61] and the SANET [62] tool for the network K-function. Given the excessive calculation (especially for the network K-function) and distribution characteristics of mass store POIs [39], all store food outlets are aggregated into 805 points based on the method of point cluster simplification with spatial distribution properties preserved [63].

3 Result and discussion

3.1 Comparison of estimated KDE value between planar and network method

Fig 1 shows that the majority of food outlets are concentrated in the central city and in the urban fringe, with a very few located around major roads and intersections in urban fringe. The estimated KDE values under the planar and network space for the walk, bicycle, metro and taxi transport modes are displayed in Figs 69, where the property of “none” presents low food accessibility with a value of zero.

Fig 6. The estimated KDE value of walk mode.

Fig 6

(a) presents the estimated planar KDE value of walk mode, where the KDE values range from 7.7 to 1973.0. (b) presents the estimated network KDE value of walk mode, where the KDE values range from 0.6 to 567.5. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

Fig 9. The estimated KDE value of metro mode.

Fig 9

(a) presents the estimated planar KDE value of metro mode, where the KDE values range from 8.0 to 2049.2. (b) presents the estimated network KDE value of metro mode, where the KDE values range from 2.3 to 667.5. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

Being equal to the proportion of area with none-zero KDE value, the scope of accessibility is an expression for service scope of food outlets within a defined time or distance threshold via different modes. Table 2 shows the calculated results of all types of transportation. From the perspective of value range, the planar method is likely to overestimate the concentration of food activities in comparison to the network method under the walk, metro and bike modes, but it is almost equal to the network method under taxi mode. From the perspective of scope of the accessibility, the region of low accessibility calculated by planar method is far larger than that identified by the network method.

Table 2. The results of KDE analysis in planar and network methods.

travel mode scope (%) value range
planar network planar network
walk 62.2 56.0 7.7–1973.0 0.6–567.5
bicycle 90.6 50.5 5.1–1306.5 5.5–1031.1
taxi 84.0 47.3 5.5–1416.4 18.2–1569.4
metro 58.9 51.8 8.0–2049.2 2.3–667.5

In fact, the analysis results of the planar KDE method for the walk, bicycle and taxi transport modes simply reflect the performance of different bandwidth values. It is clear that from metro (Fig 9(A)), walk (Fig 6(A)), taxi (Fig 8(A)) to bicycle (Fig 7(A)) modes, the bandwidth becomes larger, the density surface becomes smoother and the scope of KDE result also becomes larger (Table 2). The distribution of the KDE values under the four transport modes all shows a core-periphery pattern with higher values in the more central neighborhoods, where the higher value clusters are mostly located in southeast of Putuo District, south of Zhabei District, central region of Hongkou, Huangpu and Yangpu District, with the remaining clusters being scattered around the urban fringe. It suggests that food accessibility estimated by the planar method in all transport modes just depends on the distance from food outlets. And the planar KDE method can only simulate the “distance-decay effect” of the service capacity of food POIs.

Fig 8. The estimated KDE value of taxi mode.

Fig 8

(a) presents the estimated planar KDE value of taxi mode, where the KDE values range from 5.5 to 1416.4. (b) presents the estimated network KDE value of taxi mode, where the KDE values range from 18.2 to 1569.4. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

Fig 7. The estimated KDE value of bicycle mode.

Fig 7

(a) presents the estimated planar KDE value of bicycle mode, where the KDE values range from 5.1 to 1306.5. (b) presents the estimated network KDE value of bicycle mode, where the KDE values range from 5.5 to 1031.1. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

As shown in Figs 6(B), 7(B), 8(B) and 9(B), as the bandwidth increases from taxi, bicycle, metro to walk mode, the density value becomes smoother and the scope of KDE value becomes larger based on the network method, which is consistent with the conclusion of planar method. However, different from the similar distribution pattern in the planar method, the estimated KDE values of four transport modes based on network KDE method have different distribution characteristics. Only in the walk and metro modes do the network KDE analysis results reveal a smooth core-periphery pattern similar to that of planar analysis. In particular, the network KDE result of walk mode has the distribution pattern most similar to the corresponding result for the planar space by visually comparing Figs 6 and 9. In the central areas with red outlines displayed in Fig 6, the higher KDE values of walk mode in both planar and network space are clustered in a large area. As for the metro-based results, the higher value clusters in the network result are more scattered in central city compared with planar result, as shown in the red outlines of Fig 9. From the network results of bicycle and taxi modes, it is clear that higher values are no longer concentrated in the central city, but they are dispersed along the network (Figs 7(B) and 8(B)), which is completely different from the planar results. Similar to the distribution of KDE values in planar results, for all transport-based accessibility results, low access values identify places where food outlets do not exist and road infrastructure is limited, especially in the fringe of the south and the north.

Compared the similar distribution of KDE value among the four modes based on the planar method, the differences in the network-based results proves that food accessibility is influenced by the space-time constraints calculated by the trajectory data, not just the distance from food POIs. Furthermore, the differences between the results of the network KDE method and the planar KDE method indicate two circumstances: 1) Bicycle-based and taxi-based food accessibility based on the network method are susceptible to two main external constraints: the real-time traffic condition and road planning. In the linear tessellation model, the speed of each road segment is calculated by the trajectory data, which reflects the real-time traffic condition of the road segments. Besides, in these two travel modes, some road segments have no corresponding trajectory data. It is largely due to the impassability of bikes or taxis on these road segments, which is related to the road planning. 2) Although metro-based and walk-based estimated results are less affected by the real-time traffic condition, the difference of network results between these two modes described above indicates that accessing food by walking is mainly influenced by the distance from nearby retails, however, accessing food by underground depends on not only the location of food outlets but also other realistic factors such as the accessibility of metro stations and metro lines to the destinations for residents. Therefore, the network method can not only simulate the “distance-decay effect” of the service capacity of food outlets, which is also reflected by the planar KDE method. But it also simulates the real situations of each transport mode in the process of obtaining food within the road network, including the real-time traffic conditions, road planning and the accessibility of transport facilities. In conclusion, the network KDE method has a better ability to analyze food access which is a kind of human activities occurring in the road network.

3.2 Analysis for the results of the planar and network K-function methods

As presented in Figs 10 and 11, the results of the K-function are represented by the cumulative number of points at a given distance, where the parameter Obs is the observed K-function, and the parameter Exp(Mean) is the expectation of random distribution. Furthermore, the parameters Exp(upper 5.0%) and Exp(lower 5.0%) are, respectively, the upper and lower envelope curves of the Monte Carlo simulation at a significance level of 0.05. The spatial pattern under analysis is characterized as “clustered” if observed curve is above expectation curve; “random” if observed curve nearly coincides with the expectation curve; “dispersed” if the observed curve is below the expectation curve; “significantly clustered” or “significantly dispersed” if the observed curve is outside of the confidence interval envelope of the CSR hypothesis.

Fig 10. The results of the K-function method within the urban center region and the urban fringe region.

Fig 10

(a) presents the planar K function curves of urban cente. (b) presents the network K function curves of urban center. (c) presents the planar K function curves of urban fringe. (d) presents the network K function curves of urban fringe.

Fig 11. The results of the K-function method within the suburb region and the entire city region.

Fig 11

(a) presents the planar K function curves of suburb. (b) presents the network K function curves of suburb. (c) presents the planar K function curves of whole region. (d) presents the network K function curves of whole region.

To compare the spatial distribution patterns of food outlets, we analyze the planar and network K-function results based on the above spatial pattern characterization and the aggregation intensity for four areas: urban centers, urban fringes, suburbs and whole city (Fig 1(A)). Figs 10(A), 10(C) and 11(A), 11(C) show that the observed value (blue line) of planar K-function of all four areas is out of the upper envelope curve (green line) of the Monte Carlo simulation. It indicates that the food outlets in the planar space of four areas are all significantly clustered. However, the distribution patterns in the corresponding network space show obvious differences from those in planar space, especially in urban areas. As shown in the dashed lines of Fig 10(B), within 4.5 km, the observed curve of network K-function in urban center is above expectation curve (red line) but below upper envelope curve, which implies that the food outlets in the road network of the urban center present an insignificantly clustered pattern. In 4.5–5.0 km, the observed value is below expectation curve but above lower envelope curve. Therefore, the food outlets are insignificantly dispersed in 4.5–5.0 km. However, on the whole, the observed curve nearly coincides with the expectation curve, which implies that the distribution of food outlets in network space is even in urban center area. Fig 10(D) shows that the observed curve nearly coincides with the upper envelope curve under the CSR hypothesis. Reflected by the dashed lines of Fig 10(D), the food outlets are slightly significantly clustered within 6.4 km, while they have a tendency towards insignificant aggregation over 6.4km in the urban fringe network. As seen in Fig 11(B) and 11(D), the K-function results in the suburbs and the whole city are that with the observed curve is out of upper envelope curve, inferring that the food outlets are significantly clustered in these two study areas.

Comparing the K-function results for planar and network space in each study area, the cumulative number of points in planar space is more than ten times higher than it in network space at the same distance. For example, in the 4.5 km of urban center region, the observed cumulative number of points is around 250 in planar result and 13 in network result, as shown in dashed lines of Fig 10(A) and 10(B). This difference of results between planar and network space also exists in the estimated number of fringe, suburb and whole city, which indicates the intensity of food outlet aggregation in planar space is far stronger than it is in network space. It is clear that the intensity of food outlet aggregation in both planar and network space become stronger from center to fringe, with an increase in the cumulative number of points that reveals the distribution imbalance of food outlets between urban and suburb areas, particularly in network space. The random spatial distribution pattern in the urban center network space demonstrates that food outlets are evenly distributed in the road network, where food accessibility is relatively balanced for residents. Nevertheless, for the fringe region, the clustered pattern of food POIs results in food-access inequality to some extent. On the one hand, aggregated food outlets narrow the whole service scope, contributing to inaccessibility for people due to distance. On the other hand, the clustering of food POIs may result in crowded access behavior and further result in longer time to obtain food, contributing to inaccessibility for people in the aspect of time, especially for residents by car.

3.3 Identification and assessment for “food desert” phenomenon

According to the identification criterion, people in the “food desert” areas are of both low food accessibility and low income. Annual salary below 27,600 is defined as low income by the Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau [64]. Applying the finer income data instead of administration-based statistic data to the analysis, we utilize the house price POIs data to fit resident income with the housing price income ratio indicator [65]. The formula for income calculated by this ratio is expressed as:

I=Ph*AhR (7)

where I is per capita disposable income; Ph is the average house price per square meter; Ah is housing per capita; R is the value of the housing price income ratio indicator. According to the “Statistical bulletin of Shanghai national economic and social development in 2017” from the Shanghai Statistics Bureau and the Yiju Real Estate College, Ah is defined as 36.7 square meters, and R is defined as 17.1. By employing the Kriging interpolation method, the calculated income result is mapped in Fig 12. It is no surprising that the higher income areas are in the more central neighborhoods, while the low-income areas mostly locate in the city fringe.

Fig 12. The distribution of income calculated by the house price-to-income ratio.

Fig 12

The shaded areas indicate the income of residents is below 27,600. The colored areas indicate the income of residents is above 27,600, with the color getting darker referring the higher income. The shaded areas indicate the income of residents is below 27,600. The colored areas indicate the income of residents is above 27,600, with the color getting darker referring the higher income.

To further find areas where residents might be at risk of experiencing a “food desert” phenomenon, the estimated income is combined with the KDE value by spatial overlay analysis. Firstly, the Kriging interpolation method is utilized to calculate the KDE value of every location within the entire study area based on estimated network KDE value of four modes, as shown in Fig 13. This method can obtain the KDE value data suitable for spatial overlay analysis with income data. Although the Kriging interpolation results provides values for food accessibility in locations where addresses may not presently exist, it allows for an understanding of accessibility in areas of future development and provides a unique tool for visualizing accessibility across the whole city [10]. Then, we reclassify the interpolated KDE value data and income data to 0 and 1, respectively, where 0 represents low accessibility and low income, while 1 represents the high accessibility and high income, as shown in Table 3. Finally, we can obtain four patterns with cross combination, as shown in Table 4. The four patterns are named as HH, HL, LH and LL, corresponding to the risk level 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The higher risk level represents the higher risk of “food desert”. Residents in areas of pattern HH have higher access to food outlets and higher incomes, so they are not at risk of “food desert” phenomenon. On the contrary, the people who live in areas of pattern LL are characterized by low food accessibility and low income, which are exactly the characteristics of the “food desert” phenomenon. Comparing the explanation of pattern HL and pattern LH, people in areas of pattern HL have more access to healthy food, although they are lower-income. The areas of pattern LH are mainly located at the suburb fringe. As displayed in Fig 12, although they are defined as “higher-income” areas, the incomes of residents in most of these areas slightly exceed the minimum wage standard. Therefore, people in pattern LH with low food accessibility are more vulnerable to “food desert” phenomenon compared with the people in pattern HL. Based on the analysis for the four patterns, we define pattern HH as the risk-free areas, pattern HL as the low risk level areas, pattern LH as the high risk level areas, and pattern LL as the top risk level areas which are the “food desert” areas.

Fig 13. The results of the Kriging interpolation method based on the network KDE value in four transport modes.

Fig 13

(a), (b), (c) and (d) present the KDE values estimated by the Kriging interpolation method of walk mode, bicycle mode, taxi mode and metro mode, respectively, where the shaded areas indicate that the KDE values are equal to 0, the areas with darker color indicate that those KDE values are higher. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

Table 3. Reclassification of the KDE value and income value.

new value original value explanation
KDE value income value KDE value income value
0 = 0 ≤27600 Low food accessibility Low income
1 >0 >27600 Higher food accessibility Higher income

Table 4. Four patterns with a cross combination of KDE value and income value.

pattern name pattern form explanation risk level proportion (%)
walk bike taxi metro
planar network planar network planar network planar network
HH (1,1) higher accessibility and higher income 0 47.2 47.1 59.3 39.1 57.0 33.4 45.4 40.0
HL (1,0) higher accessibility and low income 1 15.1 16.2 31.3 12.1 27.0 10.0 13.6 11.9
LH (0,1) low accessibility and higher income 2 16.1 16.1 4.0 24.1 6.2 29.8 17.9 23.2
LL (0,0) low accessibility and low income 3 21.7 20.6 5.4 24.7 9.8 26.8 23.1 24.9

Table 4 displays the proportion of four patterns’ areas for each transport modes based on planar method and network method. By analyzing the four patterns in general, there are great disparities between the estimated patterns with planar method and network method under bicycle and taxi modes. From the planar results of these two modes, the total proportions of patterns LH and LL of planar space are both approximately 10% (Table 4), which is far smaller than the same proportions in the network estimation. This shows that the identified risk level is much lower when the planar KDE method is applied; that is to say, the quantity and distribution of food outlets satisfy the majority of residents’ demands for food access considering the aspect of distance but without taking into account the fact that the real process of acquiring food occurs in the road network. Additionally, the great disparities between the results of the planar method and network method under bicycle and taxi modes are mostly reflected in urban fringe and suburb areas (Fig 14). According to the network-based results in bicycle (Fig 14(B)) and taxi modes (Fig 14(D)), residents living in fringe areas are vulnerable to food inaccessibility when they choose these two modes. It is understandable that the insufficient but clustered food retails among the roads of fringe areas provide limited service capability and scopes for residents. Furthermore, the heavy traffic aggravates the food inaccessibility of residents living in fringe areas. However, similar to the results between the KDE method in planar and network spaces, the proportions and distributions of the four patterns related to the walk and metro modes also have similar representations, as shown in Fig 15. In addition, it is easier to see that the great majority of estimated patterns in the urban hub areas are pattern HH, with no risk of being a “food desert” based on all modes in two spaces. In the results of planar method, the clustered but adequate food retails ensure that the residents demand for food will be met. In addition, in the results of the network method, the even distribution of food outlets along the roads ensures widespread accessibility in all modes, except in areas with heavy traffic jams.

Fig 14. The distribution of “food desert” patterns in bicycle and taxi mode.

Fig 14

(a) presents the results of the planar KDE analysis in bicycle mode. (b) presents the results of the network KDE analysis in bicycle mode. (c) presents the results of the planar KDE analysis in taxi mode. (d) presents the results of the network KDE analysis in taxi mode. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

Fig 15. The distribution of “food desert” patterns in walk and metro mode.

Fig 15

(a) presents the results of the planar KDE analysis in walk mode. (b) presents the results of the network KDE analysis in walk mode. (c) presents the results of the planar KDE analysis in metro mode. (d) presents the results of the network KDE analysis in metro mode. Date Source: Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.

As a whole, identification results for all modes based on the planar method underestimate the severity of the “food desert” compared with the results of network method, especially for the bicycle and taxi modes. The simulation of traffic conditions with real-time trajectory data and human activities of accessing food means that the network KDE method under linear tessellation model identifies this phenomenon with a more accurate and finer-grained location. Based on the network-based results in Table 4, we can draw following conclusions. Comparing the proportion between patterns HL and LL and the proportion between patterns HH and LH in all modes, the results from the network method show that residents in two-thirds of low-income areas are more likely to suffer from the “food desert”, whereas residents in two-thirds of the high-income areas have a better food-access environment. Judging from the proportion between patterns HH and HL and the proportion between patterns LH and LL, people with higher accessibility are more possibly to be of higher income; however, the low-income population is slightly greater than the high-income population in low access areas, except for in taxi mode. As found in previous studies in other cities [13, 40], people in disadvantaged areas of Shanghai are more susceptible to negative food-access environments.

Visualizing the above results in Figs 14(B), 14(D) and 15(B), 15(D), we find that “food desert” phenomenon is mostly located in southwest of the city fringe and northwest of Chongming District, which are areas of agricultural land with poor development, but “food deserts” are rarely distributed in the developed central city area, which is the core carrier of economy, finance, trade and shopping centres in Shanghai. It is not difficult to understand that inequality of food access may result from the imbalance development between the city fringe and center to some extent. To alleviate this issue, the government is making an effort to balance the development of urban and rural areas, which has published in “Shanghai Comprehensive Master Plan (2017–2035 years)” [66].

Note that the population living in pattern LH area are potentially at risk of this phenomenon, but they are easier to be ignored by public policymakers. Examining the characteristics of the people in this pattern, a fraction of them are located around “food desert” area, the rest are located in the southeast. However, the incomes of most of them are just slightly higher than the low-income standard. In particular, the southeast area located in the tail of “urban development east-west spindle” has a powerful development momentum, which is resulting in rising house price and inflation [47]. As a consequence, people in this area are becoming unable to afford the rising prices. If this trend continues, people in pattern LH will be prone to suffer from the unavailability of affordable healthy food.

3.4 Implications for urban planning

As shown, no matter which transport mode citizens choose, there is indeed an imbalance in the food environment between the urban and the suburb within the Shanghai region. Therefore, it is the responsibility of urban planners to develop appropriate planning to help residents address the limited access to affordable healthy foods, especially for the low-income people.

On the one hand, reasonable planning for the distribution and number of full-service healthy food outlets is undoubtedly the more immediate solution in the short term for all transport modes. In particular, the problem of clustered food POIs in the fringe regions needs to be improved by means of setting new food outlets or rearranging existing food outlets. In corresponding planning, the site selection of food outlets is supposed to ensure the uniform distribution of food resources within the fringe regions. In addition, more markets with low prices should be established in low-income residential areas to improve the “food desert” phenomenon.

On the other hand, different plannings of transportation can be made for different areas to relief the phenomenon of food deserts. First, increasing the popularity of subway facilities is a worthwhile approach that has been put on the agenda by urban planners as a planning to alleviate the “food desert” phenomenon in the long run. Second, increasing the number of shared bikes in city fringes is an effective solution to relieve the “food desert” phenomenon. Because the popularity of “bike sharing” and “e-bike sharing” project has benefited many people in China due to its low cost and convenience, which lead people to prefer to select shared bikes when traveling within a short distance [67]. With the expansion of urbanization and private cars, bikeway has been occupied by other transportation modes, especially in urban hubs, which increases the difficulty of performing indispensable activities by bike [68]. To address this issue, local planning departments are suggested to strengthen the construction of “slow traffic facilities”, make streets one-way to improve safety for cyclists, build protected bike lanes [69, 70], and establish more bike lanes and docking points along the main trunk traffic road to alleviate traffic pressure so as to enhance the food accessibility in urban center with heavy traffic. For the taxi mode, “odd-and-even license plate rule” has played a role in managing traffic congestion in urban areas [71], it may improve food acquisition to a small degree.

4 Conclusions

4.1 Summary

This paper proposed a linear tessellation model to simulate activities of food acquisition within road networks and applies it to identify the “food desert” phenomenon of walk, bicycle, taxi and metro mode within a city of developing country, namely Shanghai, China. We developed a network KDE analysis method under a linear tessellation model with real-time trajectory data for four transport modes. The KDE values of the planar method were greater than those of the network method, especially in walk and metro modes, where the KDE value ranges were 7.7–1973.0 and 8.0–2049.2 in the planar results and they were 0.6–567.5 and 2.3–667.5 in the network results. The greatest KDE values of the planar results were nearly three times higher than those of the network results in walk and metro modes. The planar KDE results had larger scope than the network KDE results, which was obvious in bicycle and taxi modes, as evidenced by the fact that the scopes of the planar results with 90.6% and 84.0% were almost twice as large as those of the network results with 50.5% and 47.3%. These differences between two KDE methods under four transport modes indicated that food accessibility was not only related to the distance to food outlets, but also related to the actual travel constraints encountered in the process of acquiring food, such as real-time traffic conditions, road planning and the accessibility of transport facilities. The cumulative number of points in the results of the K-function method within planar space was more than ten times higher than that within network space at the same distance. Taking the K-function results of urban center region for instance, the cumulative number of points at 4.5km was around 250 in the planar method but it was 13 in the network method. According to these differences of results of the K-function method between two spaces within urban centers, urban fringes, suburbs and whole city areas, we analyzed the reasons of unbalanced food accessibility from the perspective of food outlets’ distribution pattern. The income data was further overlaid with the estimated KDE value data to identify the “food desert” areas and assess the risk level of other areas with a cross combination of two indicators: low income and low accessibility. As can be seen in the results, 50% of Shanghai was characterized by low food accessibility, and half of these areas were disadvantaged and low-income areas in suburbs, which were the locations experiencing the “food desert” phenomenon. It demonstrated that the food environment was severely lacking equality between urban and suburb areas under all transport modes. Therefore, we provided countermeasures for urban planners to prevent this imbalance from worsening in Shanghai from the planning of food outlets’ distribution and transportation facilities.

4.2 Innovation points

In contrast to previous network analysis on food accessibility, we divided the road network segments into isochronal linear units based on real-time speed to measure a fine-grained level of accessibility in network space, which translated the analysis scale from distance to time and allowed exploration of diversity within the same road segment. Then, conforming to Tobler’s First Law, introducing the KDE method to network space provided a comprehensive density measurement for more than food outlets and road density. The KDE value reflected all possible paths for all stores within the time threshold rather than using minimum, maximum or mean travel time single indicators adopted in traditional studies. The linear tessellation model has offered a reasonable space and flexible scale for analyzing food-access activities constrained by road networks. It would provide an innovative analytical framework that can be applied to other human activities in network space, such as traffic accidents, street crimes and urban function partition.

4.3 Limitations and future research

There were several limitations in this study. Firstly, we identified the locations of “food desert” areas (pattern LL) based on the definition and assess the risk of “food desert” in other areas (patterns HH, HL, LH) but did not explore the association between socioeconomic variables and the disparity of food accessibility. Secondly, we ignored the scale among different food stores, the relationship between service capability and population, and the dietary habit of residents. We simply measured food acquisition in terms of travel time cost. Thirdly, we analyzed the “food desert” phenomenon using data from only one time period, lacking data from different time periods to explore that how an area deteriorates into a food desert over time. Finally, subject to income data acquisition at the non-administrative level, we had to utilize an indicator of the housing price-to-income ratio to deduce the income distribution by extracting the house price data within the whole city, which may result in deviation of defined results for “food desert” areas. Further research would treat population density and the diversity of food outlets as analysis factors weighted in the linear tessellation model to more fully estimate the food accessibility. We will utilize data from more time periods and combine socioeconomic variables and data to analysis the “food desert” phenomenon in more depth.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate academic editor Ph.D. Mohamed R. Abonazel and all editorial assistant, reviewer Tejwant Singh Brar and other anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which significantly improved the quality of this paper.

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from Github (https://github.com/wl7/A-linear-tessellation-model-for-the-identification-of-food-desert-A-case-study-of-Shanghai-China).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [grant number ZR2024QD123]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 42001336]. The funder of the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [grant number ZR2024QD123] is the first author of this paper, Lu Wang, who was mainly responsible for experimentalizing, writing original draft, revising and so on. The funder of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 42001336] is the 8th author of this paper, Junxiao Zhang, who was mainly responsible for revising the manuscripts and so on.

References

  • 1.Ver Ploeg M, Breneman V, Farrigan T, et al. Access to affordable and nutritious food: measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences: Report to Congress. Washington, D.C: USDA Administrative Publication AP. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Key T J. Fruit and vegetables and cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2011; 104(1): 6–11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bader M D, Purciel M, Yousefzadeh P, et al. Disparities in neighborhood food environments: Implications of measurement strategies. Econ Geogr. 2010; 86(4): 409–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01084.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moore K, Roux A V D, Auchincloss A, et al. Home and work neighbourhood environments in relation to body mass index: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). J Epidemiol Commun H. 2013; 67(10): 846–853. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang H, Tao L, Qiu F, et al. The role of socio-economic status and spatial effects on fresh food access: Two case studies in Canada. Appl Geogr. 2016; 67: 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Powell L M, Slater S, Mirtcheva D, et al. Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Prev Med. 2007; 44(3): 189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cummins S, Macintyre S. The location of food stores in urban areas: a case study in Glasgow. Brit Food J. 1999; 101(7): 545–553. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beaumont J, Lang T, Leather S, et al. Report from the Policy Sub-group to the Nutrition Task Force Low Income Project Team of the Department of Health. Radlett: Institute of Grocery Distribution. 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Larsen K, Gilliland J. A farmers’ market in a food desert: Evaluating impacts on the price and availability of healthy food. Health Place. 2009; 15(4): 1158–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yeager C D, Gatrell J D. Rural food accessibility: An analysis of travel impedance and the risk of potential grocery closures. Appl Geogr. 2014; 53: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barnes T L, Colabianchi N, Hibbert J D, et al. Scale effects in food environment research: Implications from assessing socioeconomic dimensions of supermarket accessibility in an eight-county region of South Carolina. Appl Geogr. 2016; 68: 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mah C L, Pomeroy S, Knox B, et al. An assessment of the rural consumer food environment in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. J Hunger Environ Nut. 2018; 14(4): 490–510. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Su S, Li Z, Xu M, et al. A geo-big data approach to intra-urban food deserts: Transit-varying accessibility, social inequalities, and implications for urban planning. Habitat Int. 2017; 64: 22–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Giang T, Karpyn A, Laurison H B, et al. Closing the grocery gap in underserved communities: the creation of the Pennsylvania fresh food financing initiative. J Public Health Man. 2008; 14 (3): 272–279. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000316486.57512.bf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moore L V, Diez Roux A V. Associations of neighborhood characteristics with the location and type of food stores. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(2): 325–331. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morland K, Filomena S. Disparities in the availability of fruits and vegetables between racially segregated urban neighbourhoods. Public Health Nutr. 2007; 10(12): 1481–1489. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Curtis K A, McClellan S. Falling through the safety net: poverty, food assistance and shopping constraints in an American City. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development. 1995; 24: 93–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hendrickson D, Smith C, Eikenberry N. Fruit and vegetable access in four low-income food deserts communities in Minnesota. Agr Hum Values. 2006; 23: 371–383. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Glanz K, Sallis J F, Saelens B E, et al. Nutrition environment measures survey in stores (NEMS-S): development and evaluation. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32 (4): 282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Raja S, Ma C, Yadav P. Beyond food deserts: measuring and mapping racial disparities in neighborhood food environments. J Plan Educ Res. 2008; 27: 469–482. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Walker R E, Keane C R, Burke J G. Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature. Health Place. 2010; 16(5): 876–884. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Charreire H, Casey R, Salze P, et al. Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(11): 1773–1785. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O’Sullivan D, Unwin D J. Geographic information analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kestens Y, Lebel A, Chaix B, et al. Association between activity space exposure to food establishments and individual risk of overweight. Plos One. 2012; 7(8): e41418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buck C, Börnhorst C, Pohlabeln H, et al. Clustering of unhealthy food around German schools and its influence on dietary behavior in school children: a pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2013; 10: 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kauhl B, Schweikart J, Krafft T, et al. Do the risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus vary by location? A spatial analysis of health insurance claims in Northeastern Germany using kernel density estimation and geographically weighted regression. Int J Health Geogr. 2016; 15: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tobler W R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr. 1970; 46(sup1): 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tang L, Kan Z, Zhang X, et al. A network Kernel Density Estimation for linear features in space–time analysis of big trace data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2016; 30(9): 1717–1737. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ripley B. D. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J Appl Probab. 1976; 13(2): 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Austin S B, Melly S J, Sanchez B N, et al. Clustering of fast-food restaurants around schools: a novel application of spatial statistics to the study of food environments. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(9), 1575–1581. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Day P L, Pearce J. Obesity-promoting food environments and the spatial clustering of food outlets around schools. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(2): 113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Costa B V L, Oliveira C D L, Lopes A C S. Food environment of fruits and vegetables in the territory of the Health Academy Program. Cad Saude Publica. 2015; 31(suppl 1): 159–169. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00027114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rundle A, Neckerman K M, Freeman L, et al. Neighborhood food environment and walkability predict obesity in New York City. Environ Health Persp. 2009; 117(3): 442–447. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Salze P, Banos A, Oppert J M, et al. Estimating spatial accessibility to facilities on the regional scale: an extended commuting-based interaction potential model. Int J Health Geogr. 2011; 10: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dai D, Wang F. Geographic disparities in accessibility to food stores in southwest Mississippi. Environ Plann B. 2011; 38(4), 659–677. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen X, Huang L, Dai D, et al. Hotspots of road traffic crashes in a redeveloping area of Shanghai. Int J Inj Control Sa. 2018; 25(3): 293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dutko P, Ver Ploeg M, Farrigan T. Characteristics and influential factors of food deserts. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service (Ed.), U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu W, Ai T, Shao S. The analysis and delimitation of Central Business District using network kernel density estimation. J Transp Geogr. 2015; 45: 32–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu Y, Chen X. On the false alarm of planar K-function when analyzing urban crime distributed along streets. Soc Sci Res. 2007; 36 (2): 611–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Black C, Moon G, Baird J. Dietary inequalities: what is the evidence for the effect of the neighbourhood food environment?. Health Place. 2014; 27: 229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sparks A, Bania N, Leete L. Finding Food Deserts: Methodology and Measurement in Food Access in Portland, Oregon. Understanding the Economic Concepts and Characteristics of Food Access. In Proceedings of the National Poverty Center/United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) Research Conference. Washington DC. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shannon J. What does SNAP benefit usage tell us about food access in low-income neighborhoods?. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 107: 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Burns C M, Inglis A D. Measuring food access in Melbourne: access to healthy and fast foods by car, bus and foot in an urban municipality in Melbourne. Health Place, 2007; 13(4): 877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen X, Clark J. Interactive three-dimensional geovisualization of space–time access to food. Appl Geogr. 2013; 43: 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen X. Take the edge off: A hybrid geographic food access measure. Appl Geogr. 2017; 87: 149–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gantner L A, Olson C M, Frongillo E A, et al. Prevalence of nontraditional food stores and distance to healthy foods in a rural food environment. J Hunger Environ Nut. 2011; 6(3): 279–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang Y, Jiang Y. An Empirical Analysis of Factors Affecting the Housing Price in Shanghai. Asian J Econ Model. 2016; 4(2): 104–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Borruso G. Network density estimation: a GIS approach for analysing point patterns in a network space. T Gis. 2008; 12(3): 377–402. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Okabe A, Yamada I. The K-function method on a network and its computational implementation. Geogr Anal. 2001; 33(3): 271–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yamada I, Thill J C. Comparison of planar and network K-functions in traffic accident analysis. J Transp Geogr. 2004; 12(2): 149–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rui Y, Yang Z, Qian T, et al. Network-constrained and category-based point pattern analysis for Suguo retail stores in Nanjing, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2016; 30(2): 186–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Khalid S, Shoaib F, Qian T, et al. Network Constrained Spatio-Temporal Hotspot Mapping of Crimes in Faisalabad. Appl Spat Anal Polic. 2018; 11: 599–622. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Widener M J, Li W. Using geolocated Twitter data to monitor the prevalence of healthy and unhealthy food references across the US. Appl Geogr. 2014; 54: 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wadlington T D. 2017. Access to Healthy Foods: A Descriptive Analysis of Farmers’ Markets, Food Deserts & USDA Food Assistance Programs in Tennessee Census Tracts. Johnson City, TN, USA: East Tennessee State University. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu M, Xu Y, Hu Y, et al. A century of the evolution of the urban area in Shenyang, China. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e98847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.He Y, Ai T, Yu W, et al. A linear tessellation model to identify spatial pattern in urban street networks. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2017; 31(8): 1541–1561. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fan P, Xu L, Yue W, et al. Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape Urban Plan. 2017; 165: 177–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Punzo V, Formisano D J, Torrieri V. Nonstationary Kalman filter for estimation of accurate and consistent car-following data. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board. 2005; 1934: 2–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kloog I, Haim A, Portnov B A. Using kernel density function as an urban analysis tool: Investigating the association between nightlight exposure and the incidence of breast cancer in Haifa, Israel. Comput Environ Urban. 2009; 33(1): 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ripley B D. Spatial Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Baddeley A, Turner R. Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw. 2005; 12: 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Okabe A, Okunuki K, Shiode S. SANET: a toolbox for spatial analysis on a network. Geogr Anal. 2006; 38(1): 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ai T, Liu Y. A method of point cluster simplification with spatial distribution properties preserved. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica. 2002; 31(2): 175–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau. Available from: http://service.shanghai.gov.cn/XingZhengWenDangKu/XZGFDetails.aspx?docid=REPORT_NDOC_000312. 2017.
  • 65.Lv G. The study on housing price income ratio in Shanghai. Shanghai, China: Fudan University. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shanghai Municipal Government. Shanghai Comprehensive Master Plan (2017–2035 years). Shanghai. 2018.
  • 67.Zhang L, Zhang J, Duan Z, et al. Sustainable bike-sharing systems: characteristics and commonalities across cases in urban China. J Clean Prod. 2015; 97: 124–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tang Y, Liu W, Pan H. The influence of city policy on bicycle development and cycling in Shanghai. In Proceedings of the 2014 China urban planning annual conference, Urban and rural governance and planning reform. Shanghai, China. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sudmant A, Mi Z, Oates L, et al. Towards Sustainable Mobility and Improved Public Health: Lessons from bike sharing in Shanghai, China. Washington, DC: Coalition for Urban Transitions. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Świgost-Kapocsi A. The Development of Bike-Sharing Systems in Poland. The Study of Wavelo System in Kraków. Logistics and Transport. 2019; 44(4): 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Xie X, Tou X, Zhang L. Effect analysis of air pollution control in Beijing based on an odd-and-even license plate model. J Clean Prod. 2017; 142: 936–945. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mohamed R Abonazel

25 Jun 2023

PONE-D-23-15204A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. He,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 09 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohamed R. Abonazel, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

4. We note that Figures 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Additional Editor Comments:

The authors are requested to make appropriate modifications to this manuscript as suggested by the reviewers.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study evaluates the "food desert" phenomenon in Shanghai using a linear tessellation and network constrained kenel density methods. It is an interesting topic and also an important issue in China that has rarely been concerned. This work presents a certain level of novelty and significance. However, some contents are not very clear and the details should be clarified. Here are my comments, and i hope they would be helpful for improvement:

1. The English is fluent but some expressions are weird to me. For example, in section 2.1, "numbering 12419 in total" could be presented in a simpler way like "We obtained 12,419 records of the food retail outlets via ....". In section 3.3, "average house price square meter" could be "averge house price per square meter". Please ask a native speaker to polish this article and make a throughout check on such issues.

2. Equation 1 seems to be unclear. Firstly, some varibles are repeatly defined in equation 1 and 2. Secondly, what is f_j means in this study? Is this variable equivalent to f^i (speed-based weight). Why this weight is calculated as the ratio between the speed and l_e? In that sense L_i should equal to vi if there is only one f? In the experiment, L_i seems to represent the movement that an object could move in 1s, which is confused to me. Please clarify this.

3. I dont this k((s-c)/tau) is a good expression in equation 4, whilst k(x), x= (s-c)/tau might be more clear.

4. What do the street speed means in metro mode and how does it measures? Because the metro network should be another network rather that the road, it is hard to interpret the results in street-level on metro mode.

5. In section 3.3, the conclusion "the results from the network method show that two-thirds of the low-income residents are more likely to suffer from the “food desert”, whereas two-thirds of the high-income residents have a better food-access environment" could be problematic because i don' think the actual population distribution has been considered in this study. The statistic here is just the propotion of area rather than the real population number.

minor comments:

1. section 2.2.1, please add some reference for Kalman filtering and state the benefit for using it here.

2. The authors may want to add the name of travel mode as the title of every subplot in like figure 10, 11.

Reviewer #2: [Summary of contributions]

The paper presents an in-depth analysis of food accessibility in urban and suburban areas, focusing on the phenomenon of "food deserts". It uses a combination of Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) and spatial overlay analysis to identify areas at risk of becoming a food desert. The paper also provides a comparative analysis of the planar and network methods in estimating the patterns of food accessibility. Further, the paper provides a nuanced understanding of the food desert phenomenon by defining four patterns of risk, which can be useful for policymakers and urban planners.

[Strong points]

S1. An innovative framework for identifying "food desert" areas, which is highly meaningful for urban planning and public health.

S2. Real-world Application with different modes of transport and their impact on food accessibility.

S3. A detailed classification of the "food desert" phenomenon with four patterns of risk, ranging from risk-free areas to top risk level areas, which are the actual "food deserts".

S4. A comparative analysis of the planar and network methods in estimating the patterns of food accessibility.

[Opportunities for improvement]

O1. The results in this paper are mostly statistical and rather abstract. It would improve the paper if the authors add some concrete case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. In particular, it would be nice if the authors can show examples of different stages of food deserts.

O2. The paper can benefit from analysis on the impact of different government policies or interventions aimed at improving food accessibility and reducing "food desert" phenomena.

O3. The authors apply specifically KDE and spatial overlay analysis. I'm curious if other data analysis methods can be used for the same purpose, such as clustering, graph analytics, and dimensionality reduction methods.

O4. Finally, the study can be enriched by also analyzing the temporal aspects of the data, e.g., a longitudinal study showing how an area deteriorates into a food desert over time, and how different classes of food deserts can gradually transform into other classes.

I suggest that the authors carefully revise the paper to address the above points.

[Minor issues]

D1. The phrase "the quantity and distribution of food outlets satisfy the majority of residents’ demands for food access considering the aspect of distance but without considering the real behaviour of acquiring" could be rephrased for clarity. It's not entirely clear what "the real behaviour of acquiring" refers to.

D2. The sentence "Furthermore, the heavy traffic aggravates their inaccessibility" could be more specific. It's not clear whose inaccessibility is being referred to.

D3. The phrase "the even distribution of food outlets along the roads determines the widespread accessibility in all modes except for the areas with heavy traffic jams" could be rephrased for clarity. It might be clearer to say something like "the even distribution of food outlets along the roads ensures widespread accessibility in all modes, except in areas with heavy traffic jams".

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317003.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


26 Mar 2024

All the responds to the comments from reviewers and editors have unloaded in the file named "Response to Reviewers.docx". It is hard to show the revised figures and formulas in this box. Here we show the responds simply. Please refer to the file named "Response to Reviewers.docx" for detail responds.

Responses

We thank the editors and reviewers for their valuable requirements and comments, which have enabled us to significantly improve this paper. We carefully revised the manuscripts and corresponding figures. We chose the track changes mode in Word to highlight our changes in the manuscripts, where the texts in blue and strikethrough refers to the deleted contents, and the texts in red and underline refers to the added contents. The original Figures 1 to 12 have been modified and renumbered as Figures 1 to 15.

Please find our responses to each individual requirement and comment below.

Comments from the Editors and Reviewers:

Editors

Requirements to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Journal requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Thank you for this requirement.

We have revised the title page, manuscripts, figures and other submitted files according to PLOS ONE's style requirements. And we uploaded a separate document in “.doc” format containing all the modified figures, and uploaded each revised figure in “.tif” format in the document named “Figures.rar” as Supporting Information.

We hope you are satisfied with all the modifications.

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Thank you for this reminder.

We have provided repository information for our data in the form of private link. When our manuscript is accepted, we will change the private link to a public link for readers to browse and download our experimental data.

We hope you are satisfied with this operation.

3. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

Thank you for your requirement.

We have added the separate caption for subgraphs in each figure, as seen in the document named “Figure.doc” and the submitted figures in “.tif” format in the document named “Figures.rar”.

We hope you are satisfied with the modifications about all the figures.

4. We note that Figures 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission.

Thank you for this reminder.

In our manuscripts, all the figures are created by Lu Wang who is the first author of this paper. Therefore, she is the copyright holder of Figures 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12. We have sought permission to use the figures 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15 from her. And we uploaded the document named “Permission form.pdf” as a submission file labeled with the file type “Other” in new submission.

5. We note that your author list was updated during the revision process. Please complete our Authorship Change Form by following this link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=13d0/plos-one-change-to-authorship-form.docx If you are adding or removing more than 2 authors, you can complete multiple forms and submit as many forms as needed to reflect the updates. Please return the form(s) as an attachment by emailing plosone@plos.org or by uploading it as a submission file labeled with the file type ‘Other’. Please note that if your manuscript is accepted, we will not be able to complete the publication process without the completed form.

Thank you for your reminder.

We have uploaded the document named “Request for change to authorship.pdf” as a submission file labeled with the file type “Other” in new submission.

6. Please note that PLOS ONE is unable to publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images, or images created using proprietary data. For these reasons, we cannot publish images generated by software which copyrights their output (such as Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). In order to use these images in your submission, we require explicit permission from the copyright owner to publish the figures under the CC BY 4.0 license.

At this time, please kindly clarify the following regarding Figures 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15:

a) Where did the authors obtain the [maps, satellite images, basemaps, shapefiles, map data, etc.] in Figures 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15?

Thank you for your question.

The data named City boundary, District and Road network in Figures 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 were downloaded from OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/), which is an open-source platform. We checked the journal's requirements for publication of figures, the data downloaded from the OpenStreetMap conforms to the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license as long as the statement "Contains information from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation, which is made available under the Open Database License.” (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures) We have added this statement to the title of the corresponding figures, as shown in the document named “Figure.docx”

The data named “Food outlets” in Figure 1 was obtained via the Baidu API (http://lbsyun.baidu.com/index.php?title=webapi/guide/webservice-placeapi), which is an open-source platform.

The estimated data in Figures 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15 were calculated by the methods of our study.

All the data we used to create maps was is uploaded to figshare at a private link (https://figshare.com/s/267dbe734ba492ac41d6), which has been explained in Data availability statement. When we uploaded data on this website, the licence of data is selected as CC BY 4.0. therefore, our data conforms to CC BY 4.0. When the article is accepted, we will make this link public for everyone to download our data.

b) Please state whether the [map/satellite images] have been previously copyrighted to your knowledge.

Thank you for this question.

As we have explained in the question 4, all the figures are created by Lu Wang who is the first author of this paper. Therefore, we have sought permission to use the figures 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15 from her. And we uploaded the document named “Permission form.pdf” as a submission file labeled with the file type “Other” in new submission.

c) If any of the [map/satellite] images have been previously copyrighted, we require specific consent from the copyright holder to publish these images in PLOS ONE, under the CC BY 4.0 license. To seek permission from the copyright owner to publish your map figures under the specific Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL), CC BY 4.0, please contact them with the following text and PLOS ONE Request for Permission form (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf):

Thank you for your reminder.

All the figures were created by Lu Wang who is the first author of this paper. Therefore, we do not have the [map/satellite] images which have been previously copyrighted.

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish the maps in Figures 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15 under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish these maps under a CC BY license.” Please upload the granted permission to the manuscript as an other file. In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Republished from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

Thank you for this reminder.

We have uploaded the document named “Permission form.pdf” as a submission file labeled with the file type “Other” in new submission.

Reviewer 1:

Comments to the Author:

This study evaluates the "food desert" phenomenon in Shanghai using a linear tessellation and network constrained kernel density methods. It is an interesting topic and also an important issue in China that has rarely been concerned. This work presents a certain level of novelty and significance. However, some contents are not very clear and the details should be clarified. Here are my comments, and I hope they would be helpful for improvement.

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Comments:

1. The English is fluent but some expressions are weird to me. For example, in section 2.1, "numbering 12419 in total" could be presented in a simpler way like "We obtained 12,419 records of the food retail outlets via ....". In section 3.3, "average house price square meter" could be "average house price per square meter". Please ask a native speaker to polish this article and make a throughout check on such issues.

Thank you for your corrections.

We have revised the two sentences you mentioned in this comment. The corresponding changes in the manuscripts are as follows:

We obtained 12,419 records of the food retail outlets via the Baidu API (http://lbsyun.baidu.com/index.php?title=webapi/guide/webservice-placeapi), including full-service supermarket chains, fresh markets, sea food stores, fruit and vegetable grocery stores (Su et al., 2017); (Lines 194-198)

Ph is the average house price per square meter; (Lines 526-527)

In addition, our original manuscripts have been edited for proper English language, grammar, punctuation, spelling, and overall style by one or more of the highly qualified native English-speaking editors at AJE which is a professional polish website for papers.

We hope you are satisfied with all the modifications.

2. Equation 1 seems to be unclear. Firstly, some varibles are repeatly defined in equation 1 and 2. Secondly, what is f_j means in this study? Is this variable equivalent to f^i (speed-based weight). Why this weight is calculated as the ratio between the speed and l_e? In that sense L_i should equal to vi if there is only one f? In the experiment, L_i seems to represent the movement that an object could move in 1s, which is confused to me. Please clarify this.

Thank you for these commons.

For the problem about “some varibles are repeatly defined in equation 1 and 2”, we have rewritten the equations 1 and 2 to help the readers understand them more clearly and deleted the repeated defined varible l_e. (Lines 249-252 and Lines 255-258)

For the second problem, we are sorry that the equation 1 we expressed in the original manuscripts was not clear. We have rewritten the equations 1 and 2 to help the readers understand them more clearly, as shown above.

For the last problem about the definition of the speed-based weight function, the weight calculated by the ratio between the speed and le in order to ensure that the road network is divided into a series of isochronous basic units, where each basic unit represents 1 second. Therefore, Li is equal to vi with this definition of weight function fi, as you mentioned in common. This definition would simply the identification process of “food desert” with the network Kernel Density Estimation method. Because in the process of network kernel density calculation, it is not necessary to calculate the length of the road segments cumulatively, only the number of road segments need to be counted.

The corresponding explanation about the definition of weight function fi had been mentioned in the original manuscripts, as follows:

Based on this speed-based weight, the road network is divided into a series of isochronous basic units with varying lengths, where each basic unit represents 1 second. (Lines 263-264)

We hope you are satisfied with all the modifications and explanation.

3. I dont think((s-c)/tau) is a good expression in equation 4, whilst k(x), x= (s-c)/tau might be more clear.

Thank you for your suggestion.

We have modified the expression of equations 3 and 4. (Lines 278-280 and Lines 337-341)

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications about equations 3 and 4.

4. What do the street speed means in metro mode and how does it measures? Because the metro network should be another network rather that the road, it is hard to interpret the results in street-level on metro mode.

Thank you for this common.

As shown in Fig 2(d), the speed of metro network with 14 lines were calculated by the average speed of the corresponding line, the speed of road network utilized the calculated speed of the bicycle mode. Because the metro lines are connected with the road lines. The behavior of residents going to the metro station to take the metro usually occurs in the road network. Therefore, we utilized the speed of bicycle mode to simulate the behavior of residents going to the metro station.

We hope you are satisfied with this explanation.

5. In section 3.3, the conclusion "the results from the network method show that two-thirds of the low-income residents are more likely to suffer from the “food desert”, whereas two-thirds of the high-income residents have a better food-access environment" could be problematic because i don' think the actual population distribution has been considered in this study. The statistic here is just the proportion of area rather than the real population number.

Thank you for this correction.

We are sorry that the description of this conclusion is not accurate. We have modified it.

The corresponding changes in the manuscripts are as follows:

Comparing the proportion between patterns 1 and pattern 3 and the proportion between patterns 0 and pattern 2 in all modes, the results from the network method show that residents in two-thirds of low-income areas are more likely to suffer from the “food desert”, whereas residents in two-thirds of the high-income areas have a better food-access environment. (Lines 656-660)

We hope you are satisfied with this modification.

Minor comments:

1. Section 2.2.1, please add some reference for Kalman filtering and state the benefit for using it here.

Thank you for your suggestion.

We have added the references for Kalman filtering and stated its benefit in the revised manuscripts. The corresponding changes in the manuscripts are as follows:

The average speed of each road segment is calculated by trajectory data with Kalman filtering method (Kobayashi et al., 1995). Because Kalman filter can estimate the position and speed of a vehicle from a series of incomplete and noisy data, which makes it an optimal estimation method and is widely used in the field of automatic driving. (Lines 258-262)

The added reference is as follows:

Kobayashi, K., Cheok, KC., & Watanabe, K., 1995. Estimation of absolute vehicle speed using fuzzy logic rule-based

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Mohamed R Abonazel

3 Jun 2024

PONE-D-23-15204R1A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. He,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 18 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohamed R. Abonazel, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author has essentially addressed the issues I raised last time. I believe that the overall technical approach and conclusions of this article are not problematic, but there are still some areas that need improvement in terms of writing. Here are some of my suggestions:

1. In the abstract and on line 65, the author specifically mentions the US. Since the subsequent text does not focus on the issue of food deserts in the US, it would be more appropriate to use “in many countries worldwide” here.

2. On line 80, the term “Density” requires clarification. What density is being referred to? The author needs to be more specific.

3. On line 93, there is no need to quote Professor Tobler's original statement.

4. On line 96, the k-function is introduced. This can be presented as a separate paragraph since it is quite different from the previous contents.

5. On line 148, what does it mean by “current study”? Is there a significant difference between this and a literature review?

6. On line 186, abbreviations like POI should be accompanied by their full name the first time they appear.

7. On line 193, the full name of SODA might be “Shanghai Open Data Apps”, and at least should not include “competition.”

8. From line 192 to 199, the information about these websites can be inserted as footnotes in the document.

9. For Figures 14 and 15, I do not think using “pattern 0-4” is a good idea. Firstly, there is no “pattern 2” here, which seems odd. Moreover, using numbers does not convey the actual meaning of the patterns. You can refer to the commonly used expressions in GIS, such as LL (low-low), to express the patterns you are interested in.

10. There are too many references in this article, and some of them are ever redundant. For example, it might not be necessary to cite ten references to demonstrate the importance of food accessibilty to low income population without reviewing in their details.

11. Figure 3, please keep the font and style consistent in figures. For exmaple, some words are relatively too small in figure 3 and the first-letter vary between uppercase and lowercase. Similar issues also exist in Figure 4. it will be better if "the result of..." could be "The result of ...", "projection point" could be "Projection point"....

12. The unit for distance measurement should be consistent throughout the manuscipt. In Figure 11, the distance unit is meter, while in figure 13, for instance, the unit is mile.

Reviewer #3: Conclusions Should be supported by data, Kindly add data to support the conclusions with KDE values and K Function Curves.

No References should be added in conclusion section so remove all in text references from conclusion section.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Tejwant Singh Brar

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317003.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


7 Jul 2024

Responses

We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which have enabled us to significantly improve this paper. We carefully revised the manuscripts and corresponding figures. We chose the track changes mode in Word to highlight our changes in the manuscripts, where the texts in blue and strikethrough refers to the deleted contents, and the texts in red and underline refers to the added contents. The line number mentioned is the revised manuscript without changes marked.

Please find our responses to each individual comment below.

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Thank you for your requirement.

According to a comment from reviewer 1, he/she thinks there are too many references in our paper, and some of them are ever redundant. Therefore, we remove some redundant references, and the number of references is reduced from 90 to 72 in the revised manuscripts.

The removed 18 references are as follows:

[1] Apparicio, P., Cloutier, M. & Shearmur, R., 2007. The case of Montréal's missing food deserts: Evaluation of accessibility to food supermarkets. Int. J. Health Geogr. 6(4), 1-13.

[2] Bailey, T. C., Gatrell, A.C., 1995. Interactive spatial data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

[3] Bailey, T.C., Gatrell, A.C., 1995. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman Scientific, Harlow, UK.

[4] Basu, S., & Vasudevan, V., 2013. Effect of bicycle friendly roadway infrastructure on bicycling activities in urban India. Part of Special Issue: 2nd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India. P. Chakroborty, H.K. Reddy and A. Amekudzi (eds.). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 104, 1139-1148.

[5] Bell, J., Mora, G., Hagan, E., et al., 2013. Access to healthy food and why it matters: A review of the research. Philadelphia, PA: The Food Trust.

[6] Bureau, S. S., 2018. Shanghai statistical bulletin on national economic and social development. Statistical science and practice. 03, 11-21.

[7] Cummins, S., & Macintyre, S., 2002. “Food deserts”—evidence and assumption in health policy making. BMJ. 325(7361), 436-438.

[8] Cummins, S., 2014. Food deserts. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society.

[9] Epanechnikov, V. A., 1969. Non-parametric estimation of a multivariate probability density. Theory Probab. Appl. 14(1), 153-158.

[10] Kobayashi, K., Cheok, KC., & Watanabe, K., 1995. Estimation of absolute vehicle speed using fuzzy logic rule-based Kalman filter. In: Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference-ACC'95. IEEE, Vol. 5, pp. 3086-3090.

[11] Nie, K., Wang, Z., Du, Q., et al., 2015. A network-constrained integrated method for detecting spatial cluster and risk location of traffic crash: A case study from Wuhan, China. Sustainability. 7(3), 2662-2677.

[12] Rhone, A., Ver Ploeg, M., Dicken, C., et al., 2017. Low-income and Low-supermarket-access Census Tracts, 2010-2015. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

[13] Silverman, B.W., 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman Hall, London, UK.

[14] Wang, M., 2018. Exploring the direction of “city-oriented policy” in key cities from the perspective of “price-to-income ratio deviation”. Shanghai Real Estate. 376(06):14-17.

[15] Wang, S., Zhang, J., Liu, L., et al., 2010. Bike-Sharing-A new public transportation mode: State of the practice & prospects. In: Emergency Management and Management Sciences (ICEMMS), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 222e225

[16] Wang, S., Zhang, J., Liu, L., et al., 2010. Bike-Sharing-A new public transportation mode: State of the practice & prospects. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Emergency Management and Management Sciences, ICEMMS 2010, Beijing, China, August 8, 2010 - August 10, 2010, pp. 222-225.

[17] Wrigley, N., Warm, D., & Margetts, B., 2003. Deprivation, diet, and food-retail access: Findings from the Leeds ‘food deserts' study. Environ. Plan. A. 35(1), 151-188.

[18] Xie, Z., Yan, J., 2013. Detecting traffic accident clusters with network kernel density estimation and local spatial statistics: an integrated approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 64-71.

[19] Zhang, T. W., 2002. Urban development and a socialist pro-growth coalition in shanghai. Urban Aff. Rev. 37(4), 475-499.

In addition, we have completed and corrected all the references. And we numbered the references in the order in which they were cited and inserted the numbers in the corresponding places.

We hope you are satisfied with all the modifications of references.

Comments from Reviewers:

Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Reviewer 1:

Comments to the Author:

The author has essentially addressed the issues I raised last time. I believe that the overall technical approach and conclusions of this article are not problematic, but there are still some areas that need improvement in terms of writing.

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Comments:

1. In the abstract and on line 65, the author specifically mentions the US. Since the subsequent text does not focus on the issue of food deserts in the US, it would be more appropriate to use “in many countries worldwide” here.

Thank you for your corrections.

We have changed “in the United States and other countries” to “in many countries worldwide” in the revised manuscripts. (Lines 63-64)

2. On line 80, the term “Density” requires clarification. What density is being referred to? The author needs to be more specific.

Thank you for this suggestion.

We have a more specific explanation of density-based methods in the revised manuscripts. The corresponding changes are as follows:

The density-based methods quantify the accessibility of food outlets with total count, count per population or count per square area using the buffer method, kernel density estimation (KDE) or spatial clustering. (Lines 75-77)

We hope you are satisfied with all the modifications and explanation.

3. On line 93, there is no need to quote Professor Tobler's original statement.

Thank you for your suggestion.

We have deleted the Professor Tobler's original statement of Tobler's First Law in the revised manuscripts. (Line 86)

4. On line 96, the k-function is introduced. This can be presented as a separate paragraph since it is quite different from the previous contents.

Thank you for this common.

According to your suggestion, the introduction of the k-function has been as a separate paragraph in the revised manuscripts. (Line 90)

5. On line 148, what does it mean by “current study”? Is there a significant difference between this and a literature review?

Thank you for this question.

The section 1.3 Current study refer to our study objective of this paper. To make this section clearer for readers, we changed the title to “Study objective” in the revised manuscripts. (Line 136)

6. On line 186, abbreviations like POI should be accompanied by their full name the first time they appear.

Thank you for this correction.

We have added the full name of POIs in the revised manuscripts. (Line 171)

7. On line 193, the full name of SODA might be “Shanghai Open Data Apps”, and at least should not include “competition.”

Thank you for this correction.

We have corrected the full name of SODA as “Shanghai Open Data Apps” in the revised manuscripts. (Line 178)

8. From line 192 to 199, the information about these websites can be inserted as footnotes in the document.

Thank you for your suggestion.

The corresponding the URL has been inserted as footnotes in the revised manuscripts. (Lines 167-182)

9. For Figures 14 and 15, I do not think using “pattern 0-4” is a good idea. Firstly, there is no “pattern 2” here, which seems odd. Moreover, using numbers does not convey the actual meaning of the patterns. You can refer to the commonly used expressions in GIS, such as LL (low-low), to express the patterns you are interested in.

Thank you for this comment.

According to your suggestion, we added the pattern name to express four patterns. Pattern name HH expresses pattern of the higher accessibility and higher income. Pattern name HL expresses pattern of the higher accessibility and lower income. Pattern name LH expresses pattern of the low accessibility and higher income. Pattern name LL expresses pattern of the low accessibility and low income. The original pattern index is changed to risk level in the revised manuscripts and Table 3. We have added explanation of the corresponding modification. The changes are as follows:

Finally, we can obtain four patterns with cross combination, as shown in Table 4. The four patterns are named as HH, HL, LH and LL, corresponding to the risk level 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively, where the higher risk level represents the higher risk of “food desert”. (Lines 494-496)

In addition, we have changed patterns 0, 1, 2 and 3 to patterns HH, HL, LH and LL, respectively, in the revised manuscripts and Figures 14 and 15.

We hope you are satisfied with all the modifications.

10. There are too many references in this article, and some of them are ever redundant. For example, it might not be necessary to cite ten references to demonstrate the importance of food accessibilty to low income population without reviewing in their details.

Thank you for this suggestion.

We have removed the redundant references. The number of references has been reduced from 90 to 72 in the revised manuscripts.

The removed 18 references are as follows:

[1] Apparicio, P., Cloutier, M. & Shearmur, R., 2007. The case of Montréal's missing food deserts: Evaluation of accessibility to food supermarkets. Int. J. Health Geogr. 6(4), 1-13.

[2] Bailey, T. C., Gatrell, A.C., 1995. Interactive spatial data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

[3] Bailey, T.C., Gatrell, A.C., 1995. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman Scientific, Harlow, UK.

[4] Basu, S., & Vasudevan, V., 2013. Effect of bicycle friendly roadway infrastructure on bicycling activities in urban India. Part of Special Issue: 2nd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India. P. Chakroborty, H.K. Reddy and A. Amekudzi (eds.). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 104, 1139-1148.

[5] Bell, J., Mora, G., Hagan, E., et al., 2013. Access to healthy food and why it matters: A review of the research. Philadelphia, PA: The Food Trust.

[6] Cummins, S., & Macintyre, S., 2002. “Food deserts”—evidence and assumption in health policy making. BMJ. 325(7361), 436-438.

[7] Cummins, S., 2014. Food deserts. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society.

[8] Epanechnikov, V. A., 1969. Non-parametric estimation of a multivariate probability density. Theory Probab. Appl. 14(1), 153-158.

[9] Kobayashi, K., Cheok, KC., & Watanabe, K., 1995. Estimation of absolute vehicle speed using fuzzy logic rule-based Kalman filter. In: Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference-ACC'95. IEEE, Vol. 5, pp. 3086-3090.

[10] Nie, K., Wang, Z., Du, Q., et al., 2015. A network-constrained integrated method for detecting spatial cluster and risk location of traffic crash: A case study from Wuhan, China. Sustainability. 7(3), 2662-2677.

[11] Rhone, A., Ver Ploeg, M., Dicken, C., et al., 2017. Low-income and Low-supermarket-access Census Tracts, 2010-2015. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

[12] Silverman, B.W., 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman Hall, London, UK.

[13] Wang, M., 2018. Exploring the direction of “city-oriented policy” in key cities from the perspective of “price-to-income ratio deviation”. Shanghai Real Estate. 376(06):14-17.

[14] Wang, S., Zhang, J., Liu, L., et al., 2010. Bike-Sharing-A new public transportation mode: State of the practice & prospects. In: Emergency Management and Management Sciences (ICEMMS), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 222e225

[15] Wang, S., Zhang, J., Liu, L., et al., 2010. Bike-Sharing-A new public transportation mode: State of the practice & prospects. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Emergency Management and Management Sciences, ICEMMS 2010, Beijing, China, August 8, 2010 - August 10, 2010, pp. 222-225.

[16] Wrigley, N., Warm, D., & Margetts, B., 2003. Deprivation, diet, and food-retail access: Findings from the Leeds ‘food deserts' study. Environ. Plan. A. 35(1), 151-188.

[17] Xie, Z., Yan, J., 2013. Detecting traffic accident clusters with network kernel density estimation and local spatial statistics: an integrated approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 64-71.

[18] Zhang, T. W., 2002. Urban development and a socialist pro-growth coalition in shanghai. Urban Aff. Rev. 37(4), 475-499.

[19] Zhang, T. W., 2002. Urban development and a socialist pro-growth coalition in shanghai. Urban Aff. Rev. 37(4), 475-499.

We hope you are satisfied with our modifications.

11. Figure 3, please keep the font and style consistent in figures. For example, some words are relatively too small in figure 3 and the first-letter vary between uppercase and lowercase. Similar issues also exist in Figure 4. it will be better if "the result of..." could be "The result of ...", "projection point" could be "Projection point"....

Thank you for this correction.

To keep the font and style consistent in figures, the first letter of words in Figures 3 and 4 has been changed to uppercase. The subtitles of each figure are lowercase. In addition, the words in Figure 3 have been enlarged. All the changes are as seen in the document named “Figure.doc” and the submitted figures in the document named “Figures.rar”

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications.

12. The unit for distance measurement should be consistent throughout the manuscipt. In Figure 11, the distance unit is meter, while in figure 13, for instance, the unit is mile.

Thank you for this comment.

We have standardized the distance measurement to kilometer throughout all the figures, as seen in the document named “Figure.doc” and the submitted figures in the document named “Figures.rar”.

We hope you are satisfied with all modifications of figures.

Reviewer 3:

Comments to the Author:

1. Conclusions Should be supported by data, kindly add data to support the conclusions with KDE values and K Function Curves.

Thank you for your meaningful suggestion.

We have added the data to describe the differences of KDE values and K-function results between planer and network space in section Conclusion to support findings of our study. The corresponding changes are as follows:

The KDE values of the planar method are greater than those of the network method, especially in walk and metro modes, where the values of the planar results are nearly three times higher than those of the network results. The planar KDE results have larger scope than the network KDE results, which is obvious in bicycle and taxi modes, as evidenced by the fact that the scopes of the planar results are almost twice as large as those of the network results. These differences between two KDE methods under four transport modes indicate that food accessibility is not only related to the distance to food outlets, but also related to the actual travel constraints encountered in the process of acquiring food, such as real-time traffic conditions, road planning and the accessibility of transport facilities. The cumulative number of points in the results of the K-function method within planar space

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0317003.s002.docx (30.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Mohamed R Abonazel

29 Jul 2024

PONE-D-23-15204R2A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. He,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 12 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohamed R. Abonazel, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: 1. Title of Section 1.3 Should be Objectives of the Study and it should be followed by section on Limitation of the study which now is part of conclusions section

2. Line 635-642 in Conclusion is part of introduction and is repetition in summary

3. Write conclusion in present perfect tense (presently written in present tense).

4. Conclusions should be supported by data from analysis, write values to support three times in line 645, and ten times line 653

5. Innovation points Section Should also be written in Present perfect tense.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Dr. Tejwant Singh Brar

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317003.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


4 Aug 2024

Responses

We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which have enabled us to significantly improve this paper. We carefully revised the manuscripts. We chose the track changes mode in Word to highlight our changes in the manuscripts, where the texts in blue and strikethrough refers to the deleted contents, and the texts in red and underline refers to the added contents. The line number mentioned is the revised manuscript without changes marked.

Please find our responses to each individual comment below.

Journal Requirements:

1.Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Thank you for your notice.

According to comments from reviewer in the last revision, we have removed some redundant references and checked all the remained references to ensure the completeness and accuracy of references.

2. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

Thank you for your requirement.

The link showed in Data availability statement was dead. We have shared our data via Github. The new link of our data is public for everyone, which is https://github.com/wl7/A-linear-tessellation-model-for-the-identification-of-food-desert-A-case-study-of-Shanghai-China.

Comments from Reviewer 3:

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Comments:

1. Title of Section 1.3 Should be Objectives of the Study and it should be followed by section on Limitation of the study which now is part of conclusions section

Thank you for your corrections.

Section 1.3 was intended to introduce the purpose of this study to the readers. We feel sorry about the inappropriate descriptions of this section. To make it clearer for readers to understand our study purpose and contents, we revised the texts in the manuscripts. The corresponding changes are as follows:

Based on the proposed linear tessellation model, this study attempts to: (1) introducing the network Kernel Density Estimation analysis method into the linear tessellation model to measure transit-varying food accessibility in Shanghai with trajectory data; (2) applying the network K-function method to analyze the estimated food accessibility from the perspective of food outlets’ distribution pattern; (3) identifying the "food desert" areas by the food accessibility and income and discussing the implications for urban planning The proposed model aims to provide an innovative thought with a rational analysis space for food acquirement issue, and to provide reasonable implications for public policymakers by exploring the state of “food desert” at a finer size. (Lines 147-154)

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications.

2. Line 635-642 in Conclusion is part of introduction and is repetition in summary

Thank you for your comment.

We have deleted the part of the conclusion that duplicates the text in summary. And the corresponding changes in the revised manuscripts are as follows:

This paper proposed a linear tessellation model to simulate activities of food acquisition within road networks and applies it to identify the “food desert” phenomenon of walk, bicycle, taxi and metro mode within a city of developing country, namely Shanghai, China. (Lines 596-598)

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications.

3. Write conclusion in present perfect tense (presently written in present tense).

Thank you for your correction.

We have revised the tense of section Conclusion according to the description of each sentence. For example, the sentences describing research results are in past tense or in present perfect tense, the sentences describing research significance are in present tense, the sentences describing research prospect are in future tense.

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications.

4. Conclusions should be supported by data from analysis, write values to support three times in line 645, and ten times line 653

Thank you for your suggestion.

We have added the experimental data to support three times and ten times in the conclusion. The corresponding are as follows:

The KDE values of the planar method were greater than those of the network method, especially in walk and metro modes, where the KDE value ranges were 7.7-1973.0 and 8.0-2049.2 in the planar results and they were 0.6-567.5 and 2.3-667.5 in the network results. The greatest KDE values of the planar results were nearly three times higher than those of the network results in walk and metro modes. (Lines 600-604)

The planar KDE results had larger scope than the network KDE results, which was obvious in bicycle and taxi modes, as evidenced by the fact that the scopes of the planar results with 90.6% and 84.0% were almost twice as large as those of the network results with 50.5% and 47.3%. (Lines 604-607)

The cumulative number of points in the results of the K-function method within planar space was more than ten times higher than that within network space at the same distance. Taking the K-function results of urban center region for instance, the cumulative number of points at 4.5km was around 250 in the planar method but it was 13 in the network method. (Lines 610-614)

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications.

5. Innovation points Section Should also be written in Present perfect tense.

The responses are same as question 3.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0317003.s003.docx (23.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Mohamed R Abonazel

15 Sep 2024

PONE-D-23-15204R3A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. He,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 30 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohamed R. Abonazel, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: 1. Add Limitations Section after objectives as communicated earlier.

2. Revise the section on Objectives as required

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Tejwant Singh Brar

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317003.r008

Author response to Decision Letter 3


22 Oct 2024

Responses

We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which have enabled us to significantly improve this paper. We carefully revised the manuscripts. We chose the track changes mode in Word to highlight our changes in the manuscripts, where the texts in blue and strikethrough refers to the deleted contents, and the texts in red and underline refers to the added contents. The line number mentioned is the revised manuscript without changes marked.

Please find our responses to each individual comment below.

Journal Requirements:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Thank you for your notice.

According to comments from reviewer in the last revision, we have removed some redundant references. This time, we checked all the remained references and revised references 1, 2, 8, 42, 54, 58, 59, 62, 67 to make them complete and correct.

We hope you are satisfied with these modifications.

Comments from Reviewer 3:

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Comments:

1. Add Limitations Section after objectives as communicated earlier.

Thank you for this comment.

The comment you made in the last revision is “Title of Section 1.3 Should be Objectives of the Study and it should be followed by section on Limitation of the study which now is part of conclusions section”.

In our last response, we have revised the context of Section 1.3 as follows:

Based on the proposed linear tessellation model, this study attempts to: (1) introducing the network Kernel Density Estimation analysis method into the linear tessellation model to measure transit-varying food accessibility in Shanghai with trajectory data; (2) applying the network K-function method to analyze the estimated food accessibility from the perspective of food outlets’ distribution pattern; (3) identifying the "food desert" areas by the food accessibility and income and discussing the implications for urban planning The proposed model aims to provide an innovative thought with a rational analysis space for food acquirement issue, and to provide reasonable implications for public policymakers by exploring the state of “food desert” at a finer size.

We apologize for not explaining this revision well enough in our last response. In Section 1.2 Literature review, we summarized the problems that exist in the current researches on the analysis of food deserts phenomenon. Therefore, in Section 1.3, we present that our study intends to propose a linear tessellation model to address the problems summarized in Section 1.2, and we simply listed three study objectives to be achieved based on the proposed linear tessellation model. The context of subsequent Section 2 and 3 mainly focused on the linear model and three study objectives.

The Section 4.3 Limitations you mentioned in this comment is summarized based on the experimental results of this study and provides directions for future research. If Section 4.3 Limitations is placed after Section 1.3 Study objectives, readers may be confused about Section 4.3 because they have not yet understood the methods and experiments.

Therefore, in our last revision, we modified the contents of Section 1.3, and Limitations wad still placed in the Section 4 conclusions, which aims to make the article logic smoother. To more accurately express the content of section 4.3, the title of this section is changed as “Limitation and future researches”.

We hope you are satisfied with our explanation.

2. Revise the section on Objectives as required.

Thank you for this comment.

In our last response, we have revised Section 1.3 Study objective to make it clearer for readers to understand our study purpose and contents. The corresponding changes are reflected in the response to question 1.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0317003.s004.docx (19.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 4

Mohamed R Abonazel

11 Nov 2024

PONE-D-23-15204R4A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. He,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 26 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohamed R. Abonazel, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: 1. Check the grammar in the title of Section 4.3, Its title should be Limitations and Future Research.

2. Remove References from Objectives Section they should be part of literature review section and objectives should be framed by you based on the research gap identified after the literature review.

3. Paragraph one in Section 1.3 should be part of literature review and paragraph 2 of section should only be part of objectives section.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: Yes: Tejwant Singh Brar

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317003.r010

Author response to Decision Letter 4


1 Dec 2024

Responses

We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which have enabled us to significantly improve this paper. We carefully revised the manuscripts. We chose the track changes mode in Word to highlight our changes in the manuscripts, where the texts in blue and strikethrough refers to the deleted contents, and the texts in red and underline refers to the added contents. The line number mentioned is the revised manuscript without changes marked.

Please find our responses to each individual comment below.

Journal Requirements:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Thank you for your notice.

We have corrected the references in the last revision.

2. Please ensure that you include a legends for Figure 1 and 2 within your main document. We do appreciate that you have a figure legends document uploaded as a separate file, however, we do require this to be part of the manuscript file itself and not uploaded separately.

Thank you for your suggestion.

We have added the legends of Figs 1 and 2 in our revised manuscripts.

The changes are as follows: (Lines 161-185)

Shanghai’s rapid urbanization and expansion have been affecting the communication, travel, work and lifestyles of millions of residents. It displays the positive and negative outcomes of urban growth, which makes it a typical place for diverse urban research [57].

To apply the proposed method to identify the food accessibility in the Shanghai region as shown in Fig 1(a), where the urban center and urban fringe area is within the red line and blue line, respectively, the remaining area is suburb.

The study data are as follows:

(1) Healthy food retail outlets. We obtained 12,419 records of the food retail outlets via the Baidu API, including full-service supermarket chains, fresh markets, sea food stores, fruit and vegetable grocery stores [13], as shown in the green points in Fig 1(b);

(2) Entire road networks. These data are downloaded from OpenStreetMap, as shown in the grey lines in Fig 1(b);

(3) House price Point of Interests (POIs). These data are obtained from the houses put up for sale in the Lianjia website in March, 2017. The total number of points is 91,619.

(4) Trajectory data. Allowing for the travel mode of residents and low ownership rate for private cars, four types of trajectory data, walk, bicycle, metro and taxi, are selected to calculate the average speed of each road segment for the corresponding travel mode. The estimated speed of the walk, bicycle, taxi and metro mode is shown in Fig 2(a), (b), (c) and (d), respectively.

GPS trajectory data of walk and bicycle are obtained from Yidong GPS APP. GPS trajectory data for taxi are obtained from SODA (Shanghai Open Data Apps). All the GPS trajectory data are in the same time period (March 1 to 31, 2017). The speed of metro mode is set based on the average speed of 14 metro lines in Shanghai, as shown in the illustration in the lower right corner of Fig 1(b). The average speed of 14 metro lines is calculated according to the total metro lines’ length provided by the Shanghai Survey and Mapping Institute and the total metro operation time provided by the Shanghai Metro official website.

3. Can you please upload an additional copy of your revised manuscript that does not contain any tracked changes or highlighting as your main article file. This will be used in the production process if your manuscript is accepted. Please amend the file type for the file showing your changes to Revised Manuscript w/tracked changes. Please follow this link for more information: http://blogs.PLOS.org/everyone/2011/05/10/how-to-submit-your-revised-manuscript/

Thank you for this notice.

We have uploaded the revised manuscript without tracked changes in the submission system.

4. Please ensure that you include a legends/captions for Figure 1 and 15 within your main document.

Thank you for this requirement.

We have added all the figures and their captions in the main document.

Comments from Reviewer 3:

The responses to all comments are as follows:

Comments:

1. Check the grammar in the title of Section 4.3, Its title should be Limitations and Future Research.

Thank you for your correction.

We have changed the title of Section 4.3 as “Limitations and Future Research” in the revised manuscripts. (Line 655)

We hope you are satisfied with our modification.

2. Remove References from Objectives Section they should be part of literature review section and objectives should be framed by you based on the research gap identified after the literature review.

Thank you for this comment.

We have moved the first paragraph of Section 1.3 to the end of Section 1.2. There are no references in the remained content of Section 1.3.

We hope you are satisfied with this modification.

3. Paragraph one in Section 1.3 should be part of literature review and paragraph 2 of section should only be part of objectives section.

Thank you for this comment.

We have moved the first paragraph of Section 1.3 to the end of Section 1.2 according to your suggestion.

We hope you are satisfied with this revision.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0317003.s005.docx (21.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 5

Mohamed R Abonazel

20 Dec 2024

A linear tessellation model for the identification of “food desert”: A case study of Shanghai, China

PONE-D-23-15204R5

Dear Dr. He,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mohamed R. Abonazel, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Authors should consider the comments of the third reviewer if possible but are not obliged to implement them.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: 1. In Section 3.4 Implication for Urban Planning, In this section proposed implications should be supported by arguments and data from the analysis not by reference to the published work as have been done in Lines 665, 671, 673, 676 have in text references.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: Yes: Tejwant Singh Brar

**********

Acceptance letter

Mohamed R Abonazel

10 Jan 2025

PONE-D-23-15204R5

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. He,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Mohamed R. Abonazel

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0317003.s002.docx (30.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0317003.s003.docx (23.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0317003.s004.docx (19.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0317003.s005.docx (21.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from Github (https://github.com/wl7/A-linear-tessellation-model-for-the-identification-of-food-desert-A-case-study-of-Shanghai-China).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES