Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2025 Jan 23;16:965. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56376-x

Step-necking growth of silicon nanowire channels for high performance field effect transistors

Lei Wu 1, Zhiyan Hu 1, Lei Liang 1, Ruijin Hu 2,, Junzhuan Wang 1,, Linwei Yu 1,
PMCID: PMC11754803  PMID: 39843569

Abstract

Ultrathin silicon nanowires (diameter <30 nm) with strong electrostatic control are ideal quasi-1D channel materials for high-performance field effect transistors, while a short channel is desirable to enhance driving current. Typically, the patterning of such delicate channels relies on high-precision lithography, which is not applicable for large area electronics. In this work, we demonstrate that ultrathin and short silicon nanowires channels can be created through a local-curvature-modulated catalytic growth, where a planar silicon nanowires is directed to jump over a crossing step. During the jumping dynamic, the leading droplet undergoes significant stretching, producing a short necking segment of <100 nm in length, with a reduced diameter from approximately 45 nm to <25 nm. Compared to the FETs with uniform silicon nanowire channels, our step-necked silicon nanowire FETs exhibit substantially enhanced on/off current ratio Ion/off > 8 × 107 and a sharper subthreshold swing of 70 mV/dec, thanks to a stronger gating effect in the middle channel and markedly improved electric contacts at the thicker source/drain ends. These findings mark the pioneering experimental demonstration of catalytic growth acting as a deterministic fabrication method for precisely crafting engineered FET channels, ideally fitting the requirements of high-performance large-area displays and sensors.

Subject terms: Nanowires, Electronic devices


Ultrathin and short silicon nanowires are ideal for high-performance field effect transistors but require high-precision lithography. The authors use step-necking catalytic growth to create thick/thin/thick SiNW channels, ensuring efficient gate control and favorable electric contact.

Introduction

Metal-droplet-mediated catalytic growth offers a rather cost-effective, versatile, and high-yield approach to manufacturing ultrathin silicon nanowires (SiNWs) that are optimal quasi-one-dimensional (1D) channels for building high-performance field effect transistors (FETs)113. Typically, to attain enhanced electrostatic control and increased drive current, it is imperative to scale down the diameter of the SiNW channels to <30 nm and shorten the channel length to <100 nm, as evidenced in the latest fin or gate-all-around FETs1419. However, the fabrication of such ultrathin and short c-Si channels necessitates the use of advanced deep/extreme ultraviolet or electron beam lithography techniques, which are incompatible with large area electronics, such as the thin film transistor (TFT) logics utilized in flat panel display, which are fabricated on glass/polymer substrates with a limited thermal budget <500 °C and a coarser lithography resolution usually >1.5 μm11. This limitation makes it impossible to define and pattern any delicate channel or source/drain (S/D) electrodes with feature dimensions <100 nm.

Indeed, ultrathin catalytic SiNWs with diameters <30 nm have previously been fabricated using tiny metallic droplets as catalyst20 in what is known as the vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) mechanism2125. However, one of the challenges associated with the VLS-grown SiNWs is their formation as typically standing arrays, which complicates their post-growth transfer and integration onto flat substrates for scalable electronic applications2532. Moreover, the creation of FET prototypes with very short channel LSD < 200 nm33,34 continues to rely solely on the use of the high-precision EBL technique, which remains a bottleneck for mass production and scalable application of the catalytic SiNW FET devices.

Inspired by the channel configuration in fin-gate FETs, as depicted schematically in Fig. 1a, where a short ultrathin c-Si channel is sandwiched between a pair of bulky S/D contacts, one is drawn to ponder the possibility of replicating such thick/thin/thick short-channel geometry through a single-run catalytic growth process. In theory, this will require precise manipulation of the soft leading droplet during catalytic growth, enabling its substantial deformation to effectively modulate the diameter of the resulting SiNWs. Despite of several reports in the literature on the diameter variation during VLS growth3537, deterministic control over the SiNW diameter at designated locations, and the shaping thereof into a specific channel geometry, has not yet been achieved, particularly on planar substrate surfaces.

Fig. 1. Step-necking growth of ultrathin and short SiNW channels.

Fig. 1

a Illustration of a conventional fin-type field-effect transistor (finFET) architecture for logic circuits, featuring a narrow channel and wider source/drain (S/D) contacts. Fabrication involves extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) for patterning and epitaxial growth for the S/D regions. b,c Demonstration of the step-necking catalytic growth technique, which results in a distinctive thick/thin/thick channel profile. As depicted in f SiNWs grown over a convex edge exhibit a narrowed (necked) diameter (Dneck) compared to those on a flat substrate (Dnwflat) when the curvature radius of the bending track (Rb) is comparable to the size of indium catalyst droplet (Rc). d Schematics of a guided growth of a parallel array of IPSLS SiNWs to grow over a jumping step to form an array of necked SiNWs with middle diameters <20 nm and a short channel length (Lch) of <100 nm. e Short-channel FET built upon necked SiNWs, where the thin middle serves as the channel and two thick ends as de facto source/drain electrodes. g Detailed fabrication steps for the step-necking SiNWs, including guiding step formation, jumping step etching, catalyst deposition/a-Si precursor coating, and annealing growth.

Built upon our previous works on an in-plane solid-liquid-solid (IPSLS) growth mechanism3840, we explore here a geometry control strategy, based on a local-curvature-modified growth necking dynamic, as showcased in Fig. 1b. This can help to achieve a designable diameter necking at predetermined locations, creating such a highly modulated thick/thin/thick short channel configuration. Specifically, the IPSLS process employs indium (In) droplets as catalysts and produces SiNWs confined onto the substrate surface pre-coated with amorphous Si (a-Si) precursor thin film4146. Thanks to a step-guiding-growth technology of IPSLS mechanism, the catalyst droplet, and thus the SiNW, can be directed by a guiding step to grow/jump over another crossing step, providing a high-curvature edge surface akin to the diameter of the droplet. As a result, a SiNW with an initial diameter of around 45 nm can be continuously narrowed down to <25 nm during the step-jumping dynamic, forming a middle channel of <100 nm long, connected by two thicker segments at both ends as de facto S/D electrodes. Compared to the uniform channel SiNW FETs, these step-necked FETs achieve a much higher Ion/Ioff ratio >8 × 107 and a steeper subthreshold swing (SS) of 70 mV/dec, thanks to a stronger electrostatic gating in the middle thinner channel and improved S/D contacts at the thicker ends, as revealed in a TCAD model analysis.

Results

Guiding step formations and IPSLS growth procedure

In order to direct the catalyst droplet to grow/jump over a step edge at the desired location, a guiding growth technology established in our previous works37 has been adopted here. As schematically illustrated in Fig. 1g, a parallel array of guiding steps was first patterned on a planar c-Si wafer substrate coated with a 2 μm SiO2 layer, by using conventional lithography to define the terrace position. A total of 3 layers of high-density mini-steps (~100 nm wide) were formed at the terrace edge, via an alternating etching-oxidation procedure as detailed in the the Methods section. Note that this alternating mini-step etching doesn’t require high-resolution lithography, but can help to achieve a high-density growth integration of SiNWs to boost the driving current.

Then, the jumping steps, perpendicular to the guiding steps, are patterned and etched to the desired heights, as showcased in Supplementary Fig. 1. For the IPSLS growth of SiNWs, In strips were first evaporated and defined at the starting ends of the guiding steps, as depicted in the 3rd panel in Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 2. After loading the sample into a PECVD system for H2 plasma treatment at 250 °C, the In strips were transformed into discrete droplets, followed by coating with an a-Si layer at 100 °C, and annealing in vacuum at 350 °C to kick off the IPSLS growth of SiNWs. During the annealing growth, the In droplets became molten and started to absorb the a-Si nearby to move along the guiding steps to produce crystalline SiNWs.

Jumping step design for step-necking dynamic

The role of the jumping step, formed by a cross-etching as depicted in the middle panel of Fig. 1g, is to introduce a short segment of sharply turning edge surface, with local curvature radius reduced to that comparable to the In droplet size, as illustrated in Fig. 1b,c. Generally, a curved surface will alter the supply of a-Si for the IPSLS growth, thereby causing a change in the local SiNW diameter. Although our previous study has showcased a guided growth of IPSLS SiNW over large bending tracks, with curvature radius significantly larger than catalyst droplet size, Rb >> Rc47, the impact of curvature on diameter variation was found to be negligible. In this work, when the bending radius is aggressively reduced to approximately the droplet size, Rb ~ Rc, the growth balance condition could be significantly modified. To formularize this effect, we consider the scenario illustrated in Fig. 1f, where a catalyst droplet traverses a distance Lsub on a flat substrate surface coated with a thin a-Si layer. During movement, the droplet absorbs the a-Si layer from the surface, producing a SiNW segment of length Lnw=Lsub with a diameter of Dflatnw. However, when the catalyst droplet encounters a curved surface with a local bending radius of Rb, the relationship between the length of the SiNW produced and the distance traveled by the droplet along the substrate changes. Specifically, the SiNW length becomes longer relative to the substrate distance, with a ratio of Lnw/Lsub = 1+ h/Rb, where h=Rccosθ is the average height of the catalyst droplet above the substrate surface, and θ is the contact angle of the catalyst liquid to the surface. As the amount of absorbed a-Si supply is always proportional to the travel distance of Lsub, a longer SiNW segment produced at the convex edge surface will lead to a thinner diameter:

Dnw~Dnwflat/1+RcRbcosθ 1

Note that, according to Eq. (1), this diameter-necking will become more significant when the curvature radius decreases and approaches to the droplet size. This also highlights the sensitivity of the SiNW diameter to the surface topology during the growth process.

While it is challenging to pattern a highly curved surface with Rb < 100 nm using conventional lithography, such geometries naturally emerge at the convex upper corners of the jumping steps, as exemplified in Fig. 1d. More importantly, the step-necking effect is localized specifically at the jumping step, leading to the formation of a narrowed short channel at the predetermined location. The length of the narrowed channel is proportional to the periphery of the convex step-edge, that’s Lch~Rb < 100 nm. Away from the jumping step, the SiNW growth returns to a balanced state, resulting in thicker segments that are well-suited to function as favorable thicker electrodes to improve the electrical S/D contacts.

Step-necking dynamics at jumping steps

As a reference for comparison, Fig. 2a,b present the typical SEM images of the normal (without jumping step) guided growth of SiNWs upon three terrace mini-steps. The SiNWs highlighted in green feature a uniform diameter of Dnw=39±8nm, as evidenced by the statistics in Fig. 2c. Note that the surface roughness of SiNWs, resulting from fluctuations in the guiding steps, can be mitigated by refining the lithography and etching processes, as demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. Upon introducing a jumping step with a height of Hstep~100nm and a local curvature radius of Rb~35nm, as observed in the SEM images shown in Fig. 2d,e, the SiNWs growing from left to right remarkably thin out gradually at the jumping step. As indicated in Fig. 2e and corroborated by the statistics in Fig. 2f, the SiNWs that initially pose a diameter of Dnwtop=43±9nm on the top platform, shrink to a reduced diameter of Dnwneck=22±5nm over the step corner section, followed by returning to thicker segments at the flat bottom edges, forming thus a thick/thin/thick channel with an effective narrow channel length of Lch~95nm. This finding highlights the potential of a simple catalytic growth to shape delicate and precise nanoscale geometries – a capability that has remained uncharted until now. It is also noteworthy that this step-necking dynamic has been consistently observed across hundreds of independent growth experiments, provided the catalyst size, a-Si thickness, and jumping step are appropriately designed.

Fig. 2. Morphology and statistics of SiNWs guided by terraces without and with jumping steps.

Fig. 2

a SEM image of the multi-level guiding steps with the growth direction of SiNWs marked by a white arrow. b Typical SEM images of the SiNWs grown upon the flat guiding steps. c Statistics on the diameter of SiNWs. d Empty terraces with jumping steps, where the catalyst In droplets will be led to grow from the left (top) to the right (bottom) over the crossing step. e SEM image of the step-necked SiNWs, where the diameter of the necked segment is only half of that in the thicker ends. f Statistics on the diameters of SiNWs at different step-necking stages.

Parametric control of step-necking dynamics

To serve as advantageous channels in FETs, it is preferable that the middle segment becomes thinner (Dneck) to facilitate complete gate depletion, while the two ends remain thicker (Dnw) to ensure a larger contact area for improved S/D contact. To this end, a continuous SiNW with a lower necking ratio (NR) of NR=Dneck/Dnw is desirable for achieving excellent field effect device performance. As one of the key tuning parameters, the impact of the In droplet size (Rc) on NR was first investigated. The Rc can be effectively adjusted by varying the thickness of the indium film and the H2 plasma treatment conditions, including duration, power, and temperature. As depicted in Fig. 3a, for the same jumping step profile and a-Si coating, a larger Rc leads to the formation of a longer SiNW (represented by the green segment) over the convex corner, coated with a constant a-Si supply. So, according to Eq. 1, the local SiNW will be reduced to a much thinner diameter, thus lowering the NR, as the size of the catalyst droplets increases. Interestingly, this is indeed observed in the experiment, as shown in Fig. 3bd, where the smaller droplets with Rc=30nm, as inferred from the diameter of the as-grown SiNW, produce continuous SiNW with only a slight diameter shrinkage at the jumping step. In contrast, the step-necking phenomenon becomes far more significant for the double-sized droplets with Rc=60nm, and even breaks up at the jumping step for even larger ones, as witnessed in Fig. 2c,d, respectively. This evolution trend can be better seen in the extracted statistics in Fig. 3e, which indicate that the NR factor can be steadily reduced to around 47%, with Rc up to 60 nm, while preserving a continuous growth of SiNW, a criterion for the FET channel. The breakage of SiNW for larger droplets with Rc > 85 nm can be attributed to the insufficient a-Si supply, which causes the soft In droplet to experience a stretching force exerted by the front In/a-Si absorption and the rear SiNW/In deposition interfaces, as explained with more details in our previous works48. This thus forces the liquid droplet to deform or elongate, against the surface tension, up to a limit where the pulling force will suddenly break the contact between the In droplet and the SiNW end. After that, a new segment of SiNW will nucleate and grow starting from the bottom edge of the jumping step, leaving a gap proportional to the diameter of the leading droplets (~2Rc).

Fig. 3. Necking structure tailoring by the size of In droplets and the height of the jumping step.

Fig. 3

a Schematic illustration of the evolution of Dneck grown via different droplet sizes, with the corresponding SEM images of the as-grown SiNWs provided in bd. e Statistics on neck ratio. f Schematic diagram of SiNWs growing over a lower jumping step. g,h SEM images of SiNWs grown with different jumping step heights.

In parallel, the height of the jumping step emerges as a critical factor in regulating the step-necking geometry, thereby influencing the NR factor (Fig. 3f). Ideally, the step height should be higher than the local bending radius, a condition met in the aforementioned examples where Hstep~120nm>Rb. Although the a-Si layer thickness coated on the step sidewall depends on the step height, we focus here solely on the shallow step scenarios for the sake of simplicity, where Hstep<3Rb and assuming that variations in a-Si thickness are negligible for the PECVD deposition conditions employed herein. Therefore, as the step height is gradually reduced from Hstep=120 nm to 100 nm and 50 nm, even the large droplets, which previously resulted in broken SiNWs, as seen in Fig. 3d, begin to yield continuous channels. This transition is accompanied by a notable rise in the NR factor, from 30% to 70%, as evidenced in Fig. 3g,h, respectively. Additionally, the step-necking growth is performed for deep jumping steps with heights up to 1 μm. Given that the influence of gravity is negligible compared to the surface or interfacial tensions due to the small size of the In droplets and the vacuum growth environment, the droplets can maintain stable contact with the sidewall of the jumping step, enabling the growth of a long vertical SiNW segment, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. While more comprehensive studies are still needed to fully elucidate the intricacies of this step-necking dynamics, these preliminary experimental findings underscore the efficacy of both the step profile and droplet size as highly effective and adjustable control parameters for fabricating short-necked channels through a single-run catalytic growth.

Device performances of short-necked channel FETs

To testify the influence of channel engineering on the device performance, a group of prototype junctionless FETs were built upon SiNWs with or without the step-necked channel geometries. For all the FET devices, the channel is composed of 3 parallel SiNWs, connected by a pair of Pt/Al metal pads as S/D electrodes, separated 3 μm apart and defined by using conventional lithography, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 5. Then, the samples were coated with a dielectric layer of 25 nm Al2O3 by using atomic layer deposition (ALD), followed by patterning and deposition of a 60 nm thick Al film as top-gate electrodes. As illustrated schematically in Fig. 4a,c,e, the devices with necked SiNW channels are referred to as NK-FET, while the devices with uniform-diameter thick or thin SiNWs are designated as THK-FET and THN-FET, respectively. Notably, all three types of devices use the same gate stack. The transfer characteristics of these three types of FETs are shown in Fig. 4b,d,f, while the corresponding output curves are provided in Supplementary Fig. 6. All these SiNW FETs exhibit p-type channel FET behavior, which can be assigned to the incorporation of In atoms, a p-type dopant in c-Si, into the SiNW channels during the IPSLS growth40,49.

Fig. 4. Comparison of SiNW FETs with step-necked and uniform channels.

Fig. 4

a Short-channel transistor built upon step-necking SiNWs with Lch controlled by the height of jumping steps, where the thinner middles serve as the channel and the thicker ends act as the S/D contacts. b Improvement of device performance with step-necking SiNWs. c Illustration of the transistor based on uniform thick channels, where the source/drain contact area is proportional to the diameter of SiNWs. d Transfer characteristic of the long-channel transistor with Lch defined by lithography. e Device structure with uniform thin channels, while the Ids–Vgs curve is demonstrated in f. g,h Comparison of key performance indicators for devices with uniform thick (THK-FET), uniform thin (THN-FET), and necked SiNWs (NK-FET), respectively. i, Statistics on SS of THK-FETs and NK-FETs.

Specifically, the Ids-Vgs curve shown in Fig. 4d reveals that the THK-FET, with a uniform channel diameter of Dnw~45nm, achieves a high current Ion up to 1.7 × 10−5 A, accompanied by a high leakage/off current Ioff of 8.4 × 10−11 A, and a SS of 202 mV/dec, indicating an insufficient gate depletion of these relatively thick SiNW channels. In comparison, the use of a thinner SiNW channel, with a reduced diameter down to 20 nm, can help to suppress the off current to 1.5 × 10−14 A and obtain a steeper SS of 133 mV/dec, as witnessed in Fig. 4f. However, this comes with a significant drop in the on-current Ion of 2.8 × 10−7 A, which results from a reduced S/D contact area, and thus larger contact resistances. A consistent conclusion is drawn from the on-state resistance (Ron), where Ron increases by over an order of magnitude when Dnw is reduced from 45 nm (THK-FET) to 20 nm (THN-FET). This represents a dilemma for the junctionless SiNW FETs with Schottky barrier (SB) contacts at the S/D electrode, which demands a trade-off between seeking a higher drive current and better electrostatic control for lower leakage and sharper SS.

Fortunately, this dilemma can be better addressed using the step-necking channel design. As shown in Fig. 4b, a rather steep SS down to 70 mV/dec, a higher Ion and an excellent on/off current ratio of 8.8 × 107 have been accomplished simultaneously in the NK-FET, outperforming all FETs fabricated based on the catalytically grown SiNW channels. These overall device performance improvements can be clearly seen in Figs. 4g-h, where the SS, on/off ratio, and leakage current are extracted and summarized for stagging more straightforward comparisons. Notably, an oxidation process, conducted at 850 °C for 1 minute, is used to introduce a thin, high-quality SiO2 layer between the high-k dielectric and the SiNWs surface to reduce the interface states. This rapid thermal oxidation process can be replaced by a low-temperature annealing step at 500 °C for 2 h. Decent device performance, with an SS of 78 mV/dec, an on/off current ratio > 107, and an on-current of 3.2 × 10−7 A, has been achieved as demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 7, although a lower Ion is observed compared to those with high-temperature oxidation. This may result from a higher defect density in the SiNWs without the high-temperature process, which reduces the probability of hole tunneling from Pt/Al metal film into the thick SiNW source segment. Nevertheless, these results represent the demonstration of catalytic SiNW FETs with an SS < 100 mV/dec, achieved with the entire device fabrication procedure carried out below 500 °C, highlighting the advancement of combining ultrathin channels with naturally connected thick source/drain ends.

The benefit of forming the necking channel can also be learned by comparing the NK-FETs with different NR factors. As shown in Fig. 4i, with a gradual decrease of NR from 100% (THK-FET), to 70% and 50%, the SS has steadily improved from >140 mV/dec to 100 mV/dec, and then to 70 mV/dec, respectively. These findings highlight the benefits of combining a short (<100 nm) and ultrathin (~20 nm) middle channel and a pair of thicker SiNW segments for improved S/D contacts. Note that all these devices are fabricated by exclusively employing the lithography with a resolution of 3 μm.

Compared to the p-type and short channel FETs reported in the literature, especially those with channel materials prepared within a thermal budget of 500 °C as summarized in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, the necked channel FETs achieve a high on-current of 32 μA/μm and a sharp SS of 70 mV/dec. While even higher device performance can be achieved for the FETs fabricated with higher thermal budget of 800–1000 °C, this high-temperature processes or the reliance on the use of silicon wafers are incompatible with large-area electronics. Moreover, the step-necking growth method offers several additional advantages: First, it eases the lithography resolution demand for fabricating short-channel FETs, facilitating their use in large-area electronics; Second, the thick/thin/thick structure enables an efficient gate control capability owing to the ultrathin necked segment, while also providing favorable source/drain contact conditions through the thick ends; Third, the natural connection between the necked channel and thick source/drain segments eliminates the need for high-temperature epitaxial process to form source/drain, simplifying device fabrication procedure.

Compared to the conventional SiNW FETs, targeting at large area electronics, the fabrication of necked channel FETs requires just one more step, that is the patterning and etching of a jumping edge, by using conventional lithography and a dry etching process. This extra cost will be justified by a significant device performance improvement of the necked-channel SiNW FET, which can outperform basically all the other TFT technologies, in terms of on/off ratio and SS (now arriving at <70 mV/dec, while the others typically at >100 mV/dec, as seen in Table S1). So, this step-necking channel technology, based on a scalable guided growth of SiNWs, has an important potential to boost the TFT performances for large-area display logics, with just one more step and minimal additional complexity and cost.

Device model and analysis

To gain deeper insights into the enhanced performance of the NK-FET, a numerical model has been built by using the TCAD simulation suite. Despite the actual channel length of the fabricated FETs being 3 μm, to reduce simulation resources and time, this model employs a simplified geometry. Specifically, the length of the thinner channel has been set to 100 nm, while the thicker segments to 200 nm at each end. Note that this simplification in the simulation model, with the shorter thick ends, leads to an overestimation of Ion due to the increased Vds applied to the thin channel. Additionally, the Ioff is lower than that of the experimental device since the simulation allows the demonstration of currents far below 10−14 A, the lowest detectable value of our measurement system. Furthermore, to facilitate comparative analysis, a model of a traditional, thick-channel FET (THK-FET) with an extended length of 500 nm has also been constructed (Supplementary Fig. 8). The simulated electrical characteristics reproduce very well the key features of the experimentally measured Ids−Vgs curves, as evidenced in Fig. 5a,d, where the off-state current (Ioff) is notably higher for the THK-FET, but accompanied by a greater SS.

Fig. 5. Device simulation and model analysis.

Fig. 5

a Comparison of the measured Ids-Vgs curve for THK-FET and NK-FET. b Band alignments in the off state for the THK-FET extracted from the TCAD simulated model. c Potential on the uniform thick channel. d Simulated transfer curve for THK-FET and NK-FET. e Band alignments in the off-state for the NK-FET. f Partial pressure on the thin channel. g The distribution of hole carrier along the channel direction.

This can be understood from the band alignment profile extracted from the model in Fig. 5b, which shows a large number of hole carriers (~1016 cm−3) in the thick channel even in the off-state, resulting in the high leakage current. Indeed, in the case of the THK-FET, it is more difficult to achieve a full depletion of the heavily doped channel, caused by dissolved In atoms in SiNWs, about 1 × 1019 cm−3 as revealed by atom probe tomography (APT) mapping10,50, when its diameter exceeds 40 nm.

With regard to the NK-FET, the ultrathin middle, with a diameter down to ~20 nm, enables a full depletion of this short segment, thus blocking thoroughly the majority hole transportation, and resulting in a low off current, as revealed in Fig. 5e. As for the two thicker ends, the larger NW/metal contact area ensures a lower resistance at the S/D electrode (Fig. 5g). A better view of this point is provided by examining the potential profile within the NK-FET channel. As showcased in Fig. 5f, the Vds is mainly applied on the thin and short middle NW segment, while there is minimal voltage drop on the two thicker ends, different from that of the THK-FET (Fig. 5c). Therefore, it is based on this observation that the effective channel length (Lch) should be defined as the length of the short necked middle segment in NK-FET, rather than the edge distance between two S/D electrodes. In other words, the step-necking growth dynamic offers a strategy to construct ultrathin short-channel FETs on designated locations, without the need for high-precision EBL or D/EUV lithography.

In summary, we report a step-necking growth strategy to fabricate ultrathin and short-necked SiNW channels for building high-performance FETs. It has been shown that these thick/thin/thick SiNW channels, with a necked diameter down to <25 nm, a short effective channel length <100 nm, and a pair of thicker ends of 45 nm, can be steadily obtained by adjusting the size of In droplets and the height of the jumping steps. This intricate channel engineering has indeed contributed to demonstrating high-performance SiNW-FETs, featuring a steep SS < 70 mV/dec and a high Ion/Ioff current ratio > 107. This significantly outperforms their counterparts with uniformly sized SiNW channels. These results highlight the potential of a relatively simple yet highly efficient, but so far unexplored, catalytic growth shaping strategy, which is widely applicable for high-performance large-area electronics and sensor applications.

Methods

Notably, lithography with a resolution of 3 μm was used exclusively in all fabrication procedures.

Jumping steps formation

First, a photolithography process was conducted to define the locations of the guiding steps on a silicon substrate coated with a 2-μm-thick SiO2 layer. Then, the sample was alternately etched by C4F8 and O2 plasma in an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) system, to form multiple layers of mini-steps. The RF power, ICP power, gas flow rate, and chamber pressure for C4F8 plasma etching were 30 W, 400 W, 12.5 sccm, and 2 mtorr, respectively. As for the O2 plasma etching, the parameters were set to an RF power of 50 W, gas flow of 30 sccm, and a chamber pressure of 30 mtorr. Next, the jumping steps were patterned orthogonally to the guiding steps, and etched by SF6 with RF power of 30 W, bias power of 400 W, gas flow of 10 sccm, chamber pressure of 1.5 mtorr.

Step-necking SiNW channels growth

In stripes were patterned at one end of the guiding steps, i.e. the top surface near the jumping step, by lithography. Subsequently, In film with designated thickness was deposited using a thermal evaporation system at a rate of 0.1 Å/s, followed by a lift-off process via N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone (NMP). Then, the sample was loaded into the PECVD system for H2 plasma treatment at 250 °C with a chamber pressure of 140 Pa, and an RF power of 10 W, to transfer the In film into discrete In droplets and remove the outer oxide layer. After that, a-Si thin film as precursor was deposited at 100 °C by pure silane plasma with an RF power of 2 W and a chamber pressure of 20 Pa. Next, the growth was activated in a vacuum at 350 °C where the In catalyst droplets started to absorb the nearby precursor and move along the guiding steps to form SiNWs. Finally, the remnant a-Si was etched by H2 plasma at 150 °C with an RF power of 20 W, and a chamber pressure of 140 Pa.

FET device fabrication

First, SiNWs were oxidized in a tube furnace at 850 °C for 1 minute or at 500 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, source and drain electrode regions with a separation of 3 μm were defined at the two sides of the jumping steps via lithography. Before depositing Pt/Al (5 nm/55 nm) electrodes by an electron beam evaporation (EBE) system, the oxide layer of SiNWs was removed by soaking in BOE solution for 4 s. Then, the Al2O3 layer with a thickness of 25 nm was deposited as a dielectric layer using an atomic layer deposition (ALD) system at 200 °C. After that, the gate region, which overlapping the Pt/Al electrodes, was defined by lithography, followed by the evaporation of a 60-nm thick aluminum (Al) gate electrode using a magnetron sputtering system. Finally, the devices were annealed in the vacuum at 300 °C for 100 s by a rapid thermal processing (RTP) system.

Electrical measurement

The electrical measurements were conducted using a dual-channel source meter unit (Keithley 2636B instrument) at room temperature in ambient air.

Simulation setup

The electrical behavior of FETs was simulated by using the Silvaco-TCAD simulator. All devices were configured with Ohmic contacts between the SiNWs and metal electrodes, and a gate-all-around (GAA) structure. For the NK-FET model, the SiNW channel consisted of a necked region with a diameter of 20 nm and a length of 100 nm, connected to two thick segments, each with a diameter of 45 nm and length of 200 nm. For the THK-FET and THN-FET models, SiNW channels with a diameter of 45 nm and 20 nm were used, respectively, with a consistent channel length of 500 nm. The simulation incorporated several physical models, including SRH, Fermi, and CVT.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (642.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledged the financial support from the National Key Research Program of China under Grant No. 92164201 (L. Y.), National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars No. 62325403 (L. Y.), National Natural Science Foundation of China under No. 61934004 (J. W.) and No. 62304200 (R. H.), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under No. BK20230562 (R. H.), and Innovation Technology platform project jointly built by Yangzhou City and Yangzhou University (No. YZ2020268).

Author contributions

J.W. and L.Y. proposed and supervised the project. R.H. and L.Y. designed the experiments. L.W. performed the sample fabrication and device measurement. Z.H. and L.L. contributed to the data analysis. R.H., J.W. and L.Y. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Guilhem Larrieu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Ruijin Hu, Email: huruijin@yzu.edu.cn.

Junzhuan Wang, Email: wangjz@nju.edu.cn.

Linwei Yu, Email: yulinwei@nju.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-56376-x.

References

  • 1.Colinge, J.-P. et al. Nanowire transistors without junctions. Nature Nanotechnology5, 225–229 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang, W. et al. p-type field effect transistors based on Schottky junction Ag@SnO nanostructures. ACS Applied Electronic Materials1, 727–734 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Qiu, C. et al. Scaling carbon nanotube complementary transistors to 5-nm gate lengths. Science355, 271–276 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sun, D.-M. et al. Flexible high-performance carbon nanotube integrated circuits. Nature Nanotechnology6, 156–161 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Cui, Y., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., Wang, W. U. & Lieber, C. M. High performance silicon nanowire field effect transistors. Nano Letters3, 149–152 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee, B.-H. et al. A vertically integrated junctionless nanowire transistor. Nano Letters16, 1840–1847 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heinzig, A., Slesazeck, S., Kreupl, F., Mikolajick, T. & Weber, W. M. Reconfigurable silicon nanowire transistors. Nano Letters12, 119–124 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yin, H. et al. High performance Si nanowire TFTs with ultrahigh on/off current ratio and steep subthreshold swing. IEEE Electron Device Letters41, 46–49 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Song, X. et al. Highly stretchable high-performance silicon nanowire field effect transistors integrated on elastomer substrates. Advanced Science9, 2105623 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liang, L. et al. Performance improvement of planar silicon nanowire field effect transistors via catalyst atom doping control. Journal of Alloys and Compounds1001, 175189 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Song, X. et al. High-performance transparent silicon nanowire thin film transistors integrated on glass substrates via a room temperature solution passivation. Advanced Electronic Materials9, 2201236 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liao, W., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Wang, J. & Yu, L. High-density integration of uniform sub-22 nm silicon nanowires for transparent thin film transistors on glass. Applied Surface Science679, 161213 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lan, K. et al. Flexible silicon nanowires sensor for acetone detection on plastic substrates. Nanotechnology33, 155502 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jung, H. et al. Hyper-FET’s phase-transition-materials design guidelines for ultra-low power applications at 3 nm technology node. Nanomaterials12, 4096 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee, Y. et al. Investigation on the effects of interconnect RC in 3nm technology node using path-finding process design kit. IEEE Access10, 80695–80702 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ha, D. et al. in Symposium on VLSI Technology. T68-T69.2017
  • 17.Narasimha, S. et al. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).29, 21–29 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mukesh, S. & Zhang, J. A Review of the Gate-All-Around Nanosheet FET Process Opportunities. Electronics11 (2022).
  • 19.Liu, S. et al. Performance limit of gate-all-around Si nanowire field-effect transistors: an Ab initio quantum transport simulation. Phys. Rev. Applied18, 054089 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang, Z., Shimizu, T., Chen, L., Senz, S. & Gösele, U. Bottom-imprint method for VSS growth of epitaxial silicon nanowire arrays with an aluminium catalyst. Advanced Materials21, 4701–4705 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu, L., Alet, P.-J., Picardi, G., Maurin, I. & Cabarrocas, P. R. i. Synthesis, morphology and compositional evolution of silicon nanowires directly grown on SnO2substrates. Nanotechnology1910.1088/0957-4484/19/48/485605 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Wang, H., Zepeda-Ruiz, L. A., Gilmer, G. H. & Upmanyu, M. Atomistics of vapour–liquid–solid nanowire growth. Nature Communications4, 1956 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tang, W., Dayeh, S. A., Picraux, S. T., Huang, J. Y. & Tu, K.-N. Ultrashort channel silicon nanowire transistors with nickel silicide source/drain contacts. Nano Letters12, 3979–3985 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kilian, S. et al. Temperature induced diameter variation of silicon nanowires via a liquid–solid phase transition in the Zn seed. Chemical Communications57, 12504–12507 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eom, N., Johansson, J. & Deppert, K. Dynamics of VLS-grown Si nanowires: insights from molecular dynamics simulations on facet evolution, twinning, nucleation, and impurity dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C128, 17971–17983 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xu, L. et al. Design and synthesis of diverse functional kinked nanowire structures for nanoelectronic bioprobes. Nano Letters13, 746–751 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee, C. H., Kim, D. R. & Zheng, X. Fabricating nanowire devices on diverse substrates by simple transfer-printing methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 9950–9955 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Agarwal, R. et al. Manipulation and assembly of nanowires with holographic optical traps. Opt. Express13, 8906–8912 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wong, W. S., Raychaudhuri, S., Lujan, R., Sambandan, S. & Street, R. A. Hybrid Si nanowire/amorphous silicon FETs for large-area image sensor arrays. Nano Letters11, 2214–2218 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Whang, D., Jin, S., Wu, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Large-scale hierarchical organization of nanowire arrays for integrated nanosystems. Nano Letters3, 1255–1259 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tao, A. et al. Langmuir blodgett silver nanowire monolayers for molecular sensing using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nano Letters3, 1229–1233 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heitsch, A. T., Fanfair, D. D., Tuan, H.-Y. & Korgel, B. A. Solution−liquid−solid (SLS) growth of silicon nanowires. Journal of the American Chemical Society130, 5436–5437 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cohen-Karni, T. et al. Synthetically encoded ultrashort-channel nanowire transistors for fast, pointlike cellular signal detection. Nano Letters12, 2639–2644 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miao, X. et al. High-speed planar GaAs nanowire arrays with fmax > 75 GHz by wafer-scale bottom-up growth. Nano Letters15, 2780–2786 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kilian, S. et al. Temperature induced diameter variation of silicon nanowires via a liquid-solid phase transition in the Zn seed. Chem Commun (Camb)57, 12504–12507 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Küpers, H. et al. Diameter evolution of selective area grown Ga-assisted GaAs nanowires. Nano Research11, 2885–2893 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li, Y. et al. Spontaneous, defect-free kinking via capillary instability during vapor–liquid–solid nanowire growth. Nano Letters16, 1713–1718 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu, L., Alet, P.-J., Picardi, G. & Roca i Cabarrocas, P. An In-Plane Solid-Liquid-Solid Growth Mode for Self-Avoiding Lateral Silicon Nanowires. Physical Review Letters10210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.125501 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Yu, L., Oudwan, M., Moustapha, O., Fortuna, F. & Roca i Cabarrocas, P. Guided growth of in-plane silicon nanowires. Applied Physics Letters9510.1063/1.3227667 (2009).
  • 40.Yu, L. & Roca i Cabarrocas, P. Initial nucleation and growth of in-plane solid-liquid-solid silicon nanowires catalyzed by indium. Physical Review B8010.1103/PhysRevB.80.085313 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 41.Xu, S. et al. Terrace-confined guided growth of high-density ultrathin silicon nanowire array for large area electronics. Nanotechnology3210.1088/1361-6528/abf0c9 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 42.Sun, Y. et al. Meandering growth of in-plane silicon nanowire springs. Applied Physics Letters11410.1063/1.5097429 (2019).
  • 43.Xue, Z. et al. Engineering in-plane silicon nanowire springs for highly stretchable electronics. Journal of Semiconductors3910.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011001 (2018).
  • 44.Hu, R. et al. Ultra-confined catalytic growth integration of sub-10 nm 3D stacked silicon nanowires via a self-delimited droplet formation strategy. Small18, e2204390 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hu, R. & Yu, L. Review on 3D growth engineering and integration of nanowires for advanced nanoelectronics and sensor applications. Nanotechnology3310.1088/1361-6528/ac547a (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 46.Xu, M. et al. High performance transparent in-plane silicon nanowire Fin-TFTs via a robust nano-droplet-scanning crystallization dynamics. Nanoscale9, 10350–10357 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xue, Z. et al. Deterministic line-shape programming of silicon nanowires for extremely stretchable springs and electronics. Nano Letters17, 7638–7646 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xue, Z. et al. Engineering island-chain silicon nanowires via a droplet mediated Plateau-Rayleigh transformation. Nature Communications7, 12836 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yu, L. et al. Growth-in-place deployment of in-plane silicon nanowires. Applied Physics Letters9910.1063/1.3659895 (2011).
  • 50.Chen, W. et al. Incorporation and redistribution of impurities into silicon nanowires during metal-particle-assisted growth. Nature Communications5, 4134 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (642.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES