Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1992 Aug;454:533–547. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019278

Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components.

R C Fitzpatrick 1, J L Taylor 1, D I McCloskey 1
PMCID: PMC1175619  PMID: 1474502

Abstract

1. It has been demonstrated that subjects can alter the reflex stiffness of the elbow and wrist in response to imperceptibly slow perturbations applied through a complaint coupling. We used this technique to measure ankle stiffness in standing subjects as a means of examining reflex activity. 2. During unperturbed stance, a linear relationship between ankle torque and ankle angle is expressed as a load stiffness. The load stiffness predicted from a subject's measured physical dimensions corresponds closely with the value measured by standing the subject on a force platform. 3. Slow perturbations were applied at waist level, through a spring, to standing subjects. The perturbations caused sway similar in magnitude and rate to the sway of normal stance. Ankle stiffness was measured during the period when the perturbations were unperceived. The contribution to ankle stiffness of reflexes that use visual information was assessed by eye closure. The ability of reflexes based on sensory information from the legs to maintain upright posture was assessed when subjects balanced a load equivalent to their own body, in a situation where neither visual nor vestibular information could assist. Ankle stiffness was measured while the load was perturbed. 4. The results show that a simple mechanical model of stance predicts the torque-angle relationship at the ankle. This relationship determines the minimal ankle stiffness required to stand, and reflex muscle stiffness is a necessary component of this ankle stiffness. Visual, vestibular and lower limb sensorimotor reflexes each contribute to ankle stiffness; however, the local sensory reflexes alone are sufficient to stand. For responses to unperceived perturbations, standing subjects can alter their reflex ankle stiffness according to intentional set.

Full text

PDF
533

Images in this article

541Fig. 5
on p.541

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allum J. H., Büdingen H. J. Coupled stretch reflexes in ankle muscles: an evaluation of the contributions of active muscle mechanisms to human posture stability. Prog Brain Res. 1979;50:185–195. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60819-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aniss A. M., Diener H. C., Hore J., Gandevia S. C., Burke D. Behavior of human muscle receptors when reliant on proprioceptive feedback during standing. J Neurophysiol. 1990 Aug;64(2):661–670. doi: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.2.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke D., Eklund G. Muscle spindle activity in man during standing. Acta Physiol Scand. 1977 Jun;100(2):187–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1977.tb05936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colebatch J. G., McCloskey D. I. Maintenance of constant arm position or force: reflex and volitional components in man. J Physiol. 1987 May;386:247–261. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crago P. E., Houk J. C., Hasan Z. Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Sep;39(5):925–935. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.5.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diener H. C., Dichgans J., Bruzek W., Selinka H. Stabilization of human posture during induced oscillations of the body. Exp Brain Res. 1982;45(1-2):126–132. doi: 10.1007/BF00235771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diener H. C., Dichgans J., Guschlbauer B., Mau H. The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia. Brain Res. 1984 Mar 26;296(1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90515-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evarts E. V., Granit R. Relations of reflexes and intended movements. Prog Brain Res. 1976;44:1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60719-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HAMMOND P. H. The influence of prior instruction to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuro-muscular response. J Physiol. 1956 Apr 27;132(1):17–8P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hore J., McCloskey D. I., Taylor J. L. Task-dependent changes in gain of the reflex response to imperceptible perturbations of joint position in man. J Physiol. 1990 Oct;429:309–321. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JOSEPH J., NIGHTINGALE A. [Electromyography of muscles of posture: leg muscles in males]. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):484–491. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katz R., Meunier S., Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Changes in presynaptic inhibition of Ia fibres in man while standing. Brain. 1988 Apr;111(Pt 2):417–437. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.2.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LEVY R. The relative importance of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the ankle jerk of man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1963 Apr;26:148–150. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.26.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marsden C. D., Merton P. A., Morton H. B. Servo action in the human thumb. J Physiol. 1976 May;257(1):1–44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mauritz K. H., Dietz V. Characteristics of postural instability induced by ischemic blocking of leg afferents. Exp Brain Res. 1980;38(1):117–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00237939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nardone A., Giordano A., Corrà T., Schieppati M. Responses of leg muscles in humans displaced while standing. Effects of types of perturbation and of postural set. Brain. 1990 Feb;113(Pt 1):65–84. doi: 10.1093/brain/113.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nashner L. M. A model describing vestibular detection of body sway motion. Acta Otolaryngol. 1971 Dec;72(6):429–436. doi: 10.3109/00016487109122504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nashner L. M. Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res. 1976 Aug 27;26(1):59–72. doi: 10.1007/BF00235249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nashner L. M. Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance. Exp Brain Res. 1977 Oct 24;30(1):13–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00237855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nashner L., Berthoz A. Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control. Brain Res. 1978 Jul 14;150(2):403–407. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90291-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nichols T. R., Houk J. C. Reflex compensation for variations in the mechanical properties of a muscle. Science. 1973 Jul 13;181(4095):182–184. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4095.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rack P. M., Westbury D. R. The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties. J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):331–350. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SMITH J. W. The forces operating at the human ankle joint during standing. J Anat. 1957 Oct;91(4):545–564. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Woollacott M. H., von Hosten C., Rösblad B. Relation between muscle response onset and body segmental movements during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1988;72(3):593–604. doi: 10.1007/BF00250604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Asten W. N., Gielen C. C., Denier van der Gon J. J. Postural adjustments induced by simulated motion of differently structured environments. Exp Brain Res. 1988;73(2):371–383. doi: 10.1007/BF00248230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES