Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1992 May;450:325–340. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019129

Pulsatile release of acetylcholine by nerve terminals (synaptosomes) isolated from Torpedo electric organ.

R Girod 1, L Eder-Colli 1, J Medilanski 1, Y Dunant 1, N Tabti 1, M M Poo 1
PMCID: PMC1176124  PMID: 1432711

Abstract

1. Electrophysiological detection of acetylcholine (ACh) release by synaptosomes from the electric organ of Torpedo was searched for by laying the isolated nerve terminals on a culture of Xenopus embryonic muscle cells (myocytes), and by recording the ACh-induced inward currents in the myocytes. 2. Whole-cell recording in one of the myocytes revealed rapid inward currents that where generated soon after synaptosome application. These pulsatile events strongly resembled those occurring normally during the early phase of synaptogenesis after nerve-muscle contact in Xenopus cell cultures. They were called spontaneous synaptic currents (SSCs). 3. The SSCs produced by the synaptosomes had a rapid time course, with mean time-to-peak and half-decay times of 2.6 +/- 0.4 ms and 6.0 +/- 1.1 ms, respectively. Most events had a falling phase that could be fitted with a single exponential. The mean time constant of decay was 6.2 +/- 1.1 ms. More than half of the SSCs (approximately 60%) constituted a rather homogenous population in which the time-to-peak versus amplitude showed a positive relationship, the smallest events displaying a shorter time course. The rest of the SSCs had a more variable and slower time course. Such events are also observed in young and mature junctions in situ. 4. The amplitudes of SSCs had a wide distribution which was skewed towards the smallest values. The mean amplitude was 65.2 +/- 16.1 pA. 5. During the minutes following an application of synaptosomes, the frequency of the SSCs tended to decrease, but their mean amplitude remained constant. Such behaviour could be reproduced during several successive additions of synaptosomes while recording in the same myocyte. 6. Just after synaptosome application, the SSCs were superposed to a noisy inward current that lasted for 20-60 s. Noise analysis of this current gave the values of 0.7 +/- 0.1 pA for the mean amplitude of the elementary event, and 4.7 +/- 0.2 ms for its mean duration, values that compare well with those reported for the activation of frog embryonic nicotinic receptor. This suggests that the noisy current was due to ACh molecules set free by synaptosomes which were either damaged or which released ACh at some distance. This view was strengthened by biochemical analysis of ACh release by synaptosomes in vitro. 7. Tubocurarine reversibly abolished the appearance of both the noise and the synaptosome-generated SSCs, showing that these currents were due to the action of ACh.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
325

Images in this article

329Fig. 1
on p.329

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W., Zorychta E. Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):731–756. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brehm P., Steinbach J. H., Kidokoro Y. Channel open time of acetylcholine receptors on Xenopus muscle cells in dissociated cell culture. Dev Biol. 1982 May;91(1):93–102. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchanan J., Sun Y. A., Poo M. M. Studies of nerve-muscle interactions in Xenopus cell culture: fine structure of early functional contacts. J Neurosci. 1989 May;9(5):1540–1554. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-05-01540.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chow I., Poo M. M. Release of acetylcholine from embryonic neurons upon contact with muscle cell. J Neurosci. 1985 Apr;5(4):1076–1082. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-04-01076.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunant Y., Muller D. Quantal release of acetylcholine evoked by focal depolarization at the Torpedo nerve-electroplaque junction. J Physiol. 1986 Oct;379:461–478. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evers J., Laser M., Sun Y. A., Xie Z. P., Poo M. M. Studies of nerve-muscle interactions in Xenopus cell culture: analysis of early synaptic currents. J Neurosci. 1989 May;9(5):1523–1539. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-05-01523.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grinnell A. D., Gundersen C. B., Meriney S. D., Young S. H. Direct measurement of ACh release from exposed frog nerve terminals: constraints on interpretation of non-quantal release. J Physiol. 1989 Dec;419:225–251. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hartzell H. C., Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. Post-synaptic potentiation: interaction between quanta of acetylcholine at the skeletal neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):427–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Israël M., Lesbats B. Continuous determination by a chemiluminescent method of acetylcholine release and compartmentation in Torpedo electric organ synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1981 Dec;37(6):1475–1483. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb06317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Israël M., Manaranche R., Mastour-Frachon P., Morel N. Isolation of pure cholinergic nerve endings from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata. Biochem J. 1976 Oct 15;160(1):113–115. doi: 10.1042/bj1600113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kidokoro Y., Rohrbough J. Acetylcholine receptor channels in Xenopus myocyte culture; brief openings, brief closures and slow desensitization. J Physiol. 1990 Jun;425:227–244. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Land B. R., Harris W. V., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Diffusion and binding constants for acetylcholine derived from the falling phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1594–1598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Acetylcholine receptor site density affects the rising phase of miniature endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3736–3740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Kinetic parameters for acetylcholine interaction in intact neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Michaelson D. M., Sokolovsky M. Induced acetylcholine release from active purely cholinergic Torpedo synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1978 Jan;30(1):217–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1978.tb07055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morel N., Israel M., Manaranche R. Determination of ACh concentration in torpedo synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1978 Jun;30(6):1553–1557. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1978.tb10492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morel N., Israel M., Manaranche R., Mastour-Frachon P. Isolation of pure cholinergic nerve endings from Torpedo electric organ. Evaluation of their metabolic properties. J Cell Biol. 1977 Oct;75(1):43–55. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muller D., Dunant Y. Spontaneous quantal and subquantal transmitter release at the Torpedo nerve-electroplaque junction. Neuroscience. 1987 Mar;20(3):911–921. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(87)90252-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spitzer N. C., Lamborghini J. E. The development of the action potential mechanism of amphibian neurons isolated in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 May;73(5):1641–1645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WHITTAKER V. P. The isolation and characterization of acetylcholine-containing particles from brain. Biochem J. 1959 Aug;72:694–706. doi: 10.1042/bj0720694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xie Z. P., Poo M. M. Initial events in the formation of neuromuscular synapse: rapid induction of acetylcholine release from embryonic neuron. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(18):7069–7073. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.18.7069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES