Abstract
Organ fibrosis, considered as a major global health concern, is a pathological condition often occurring after tissue injury in various organs. The pathogenesis of fibrosis involves multiple phases and multiple cell types. Dopamine is involved in various life activities by activating five receptors (D1, D2, D3, D4, D5). Activation or loss of function of dopamine receptors has been reported to be associated with the fibrosis of several organs, such as ocular, lung, liver, heart, and kidney. In this paper, we review dopamine receptors’ potential roles in organ fibrosis and mechanisms by which organ fibrosis develops or decreases when dopamine receptors function is activated or perturbed.
Keywords: Dopamine, Dopamine receptors, Fibrosis
Highlights
-
•
Fibrosis is a major global health concern, resulting in tissue architecture disruption, organ dysfunction, and organ failure.
-
•
The specificities of dopamine receptors(DRs) in organs have been demonstrated to influence the development of fibrosis.
-
•
DRs affect organ fibrosis by inhibition of injury; deactivation of myofibroblasts and degradation of extracellular matrix.
1. Introduction
Fibrosis is an outcome of the tissue healing response to chronic damage in various organs. It is a disease state characterized by an abnormal increase in extracellular matrix (ECM) components like fibronectin and collagen. When damage is minor, there is only a transient increase in the deposition of ECM components and facilitating the restoration of functional tissue architecture. However, when the injury is severe, ECM components continue to accumulate, It can result in tissue architecture disruption, organ dysfunction, and eventual organ failure [1]. To some extent, fibrosis is a major global health concern, and it has been reported that up to 45 % of all deaths in developed countries are caused by fibrotic tissue responses [2]. The pathogenesis of fibrosis involves multiple phases and multiple cell types, along with the release of cytokines and growth factors caused by platelet aggregation and degranulation, proliferation and effector cell activation, and finally, ECM deposition and remodeling. The complex interactions among mesenchymal cells, epithelial cells, vascular endothelial cells, and cells related to inflammation are regulated by various soluble mediators in the microenvironment [[3], [4], [5]].
In recent years, researches have demonstrated the role of dopamine receptors (DRs) in regulating fibrosis in tissues such as in the lung, liver and kidney. To some extent, this is not surprising, because dopamine (DA), a catecholamine neurotransmitter, plays a role in the central nervous system and inflammation [6]. Dopamine exerts its effects through five receptors: dopamine D1 receptor (D1R), dopamine D2 receptor (D2R), dopamine D3 receptor (D3R), dopamine D4 receptor (D4R), and dopamine D5 receptor (D5R). DRs belong to the rhodopsin family/class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). DRs are located within many tissues, including the brain, spinal cord, eye, heart, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract [[7], [8], [9]].
In this review, we summarized the data on DA and DRs and their roles in organ fibrosis. We describe 1) the basic structure, distribution, and signal transduction mechanisms of DA and DRs and 2) the experimental and clinical evidences for the effects of DRs on organ fibrosis. These may strengthen our understanding of the role of dopamine and its receptors in organ fibrosis and highlight their potential as antifibrotic agents.
2. Dopamine, dopamine receptors and their signaling pathways
DA is synthesized from the nonessential amino acid l-tyrosine in the cytoplasm of noradrenergic and dopaminergic nerves, as well as non-neural tissues like the kidney and gastrointestinal tract [10]. After being produced, DA is moved into secretory vesicles for storage. Upon stimulation, DA-containing vesicles fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane and release DA into the synaptic cleft via exocytosis. DA works through binding to specific cell surface receptors and activating DA signaling. These receptors belong to the rhodopsin-like family and are characterized by having seven transmembrane domains and linkages to heterotrimeric G proteins, which consist of a, b, and g subunits. According to ligand recognition properties and physiological effects on cAMP production, DRs are initially divided into two pharmacological families [11]:D1-like and D2-like receptors. D1R and D5R are D1-like receptors which coupled to Gs and Golf proteins and then stimulating adenylyl cyclase (AC) and cAMP production, while D2R, D3R, and D4R are D2-like receptors which coupled to Go and Gi proteins and then inhibiting AC, resulting in a
Decrease in cytosolic cAMP levels. The roles of DA and DRs in the central nervous system (CNS) have been extensively studied [12,13]. DRs have also been identified outside the brain in various organs and tissues, comprising the immune cells, vascular beds, heart, gastrointestinal tract, eyes, kidney, and the pancreas [14,15]. DRs can act as monomers or form dimeric and/or oligomeric complexes through the combination of either a single species (homodimers or homomers) or distinct species (heterodimers or heteromers) [16,17]. Various dopamine-associated behaviors and functions are induced and regulated through dopamine signals and dopamine receptors. The main signaling pathways associated with dopamine include cAMP/PKA signaling, ERK signaling, Akt/GSK-3 signaling, phospholipase signaling and Ca2+ channel signaling [18]. D1-like receptors or D2-like receptors can activate or inactivate these signaling pathways by phosphorylating/dephosphorylating key enzymes [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]].
3. Dopamine receptors in organ fibrosis
3.1. Dopamine receptors and ocular fibrosis
Ocular fibrosis causes visual loss in millions of people worldwide [27]. It has been reported that retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells can synthesize both l-DOPA and dopamine [28,29]. DA and dopaminergic signaling in the retina have been thoroughly investigated. In Gao's study [30], compared with D1R, D3R, and D4R, D2R and D5R were prominently expressed in RPE cells. D5R expression in RPE cells rose after 24-h exposure to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), but this increase did not continue with further incubation, while D2R mRNA expression remained higher than that of D5R. According to Gao'study, because D2R and D5R are prominently expressed in RPE cells, so they focused on the relationship between these two DRs and ocular fibrosis. In the absence of profibrotic stimuli by TGF-β, loxapine (a D2R antagonist) and Fenoldopam (a D5R agonist) inhibited fibrotic activity in RPE cells. No matter Fenoldopam or Loxapine exerted their effects through interactions with DRs. Moreover, D2R is the dominant recipient of autocrine dopamine signaling in RPE cells exposed to TGF-βstimuli. When adding exogenous dopamine alone to the cells, adding loxapine or fenoldopam in the absence of TGF-β also had no effect in the fibrotic process. Another latest research also showed that besides loxapine, other D2R antagonists, for example, Fluphenazine exhibited anti fibrotic effects [31]. So far, there have been no studies reported changes in fibrosis after activation or antagonism of these three DRs (D1R、D3R、D4R), so the relationship between these three DRs and ocular fibrosis is still unclear.
3.2. Dopamine receptors and cardiac fibrosis
All DRs except for D4R are present within the heart in animals such as mice, or rats [[32], [33], [34]]. Furthermore, evidence links age-related cardiac fibrosis with the loss of functional D3R in D3R knockout mouse, leading to the over-accumulated collagen in the heart's interstitial space [35]. Another recent study suggested that pramipexole,a D3R agonist, could prevent morphine-induced hypertrophy, a state which may develop to cardiac fibrosis in C57BL/6 male mice [36]. D1R, the most abundant DR present in the CNS, is also expressed in various other organs [37,38]. The D1R in H9C2 cardiac myoblasts is more highly expressed compared to other cells and markedly increased following intervention with doxorubicin (DOX). Evidence suggested that A-68930, a specific D1R-specific agonist, could reduce cardiac damage and fibrosis in mice treated with DOX via the inhibition of the nucleotide-binding domain-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in the heart [39]. Previous studies have suggested that D1R and D3R participate in crosstalk in human and mice, but the question of functionality is still unclear [40]. However, considering the excitatory characteristics of D1R and its inhibitory effects on D3R, the combined effects of these two receptors on the heart may explain the mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis and heart failure. This finding will lead to identifying targets for halting the pro-fibrotic effects of these receptors.
3.3. Dopamine receptors and lung fibrosis
Lung fibrosis is a kind of lung disorder marked by the progressive and irreversible damage to alveolar epithelial architecture, which ultimately leads to respiratory failure. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) globally occurs among about 3 million people [41]. Dopamine and DRs are reported to be expressed in lung tissue; D1-like receptors (D1R, D5R) are present in nerve fibers in pulmonary nerve trunks, and D2-like receptors (D2R, D3R, D4R) are present in pulmonary trunks [42]. D1R was also reported to be expressed predominantly in fibroblasts, and D1R agonism could reduce lung collagen abundance after bleomycin (BLM)-trigged lung injury in mouse and stimulation of D1R prompted fibroblasts to present a pro-resolution phenotype by enhancing expression of matrix degrading enzymes and promoting fibroblasts to produce a less stiff ECM in vitro [43]. Dihydrexidine, one kind of D1R agonist, can inactivate YAP (Yes-associated protein)/TAZ (transcriptional coactivator with PDZ binding motif) in fibroblasts [44] and stimulate cathepsin K [45], a gene related to collagen I degradation and clearance [46], thereby reducing the expression of ECM, and TGF-β-stimulated collagen I accumulation. In a BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis mouse model, the use of spiperone and pegylated hyaluronidase (pegHYAL) represents a novel strategy for treating pneumofibrosis. Spiperone is a selective D2R antagonist and the pegHYAL can block D2R and subsequent changes in the hyaluronan matrix [47]. When administered singularly and in combination with pegHYAL, spiperone could reduce hydroxyproline and total collagen levels compared with monotherapy in mice. Despite the opposing functions of D1-like receptors and D2-like receptors, findings from Mou's study demonstrated that a selective D1R agonist (Fenoldopam, FNP) and a selective D2R agonist (sumanirole, SMR) protected mice from BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis. They achieved this by blocking TGF-β1/Smad2 signaling to inhibit fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, thereby decreasing the levels of fibrotic markers both in vitro and in vivo [48]. These DR agonists could be a promising treatment option for patients with IPF in clinical practice.
3.4. Dopamine receptors and liver fibrosis
Liver injury can stimulate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) to transition from a quiescent state to a fibrogenic, proliferative, and myofibroblastic phenotype. This transformation is crucial for the collagen progressive accumulation, which ultimately leads to liver fibrosis [49]. Liver fibrosis is a chronic and lethal complication of liver disease, and there is no effective treatment for this condition. It have been reported that sympathetic nervous system inhibitors could help in reducing liver fibrosis in CCl4 treated Wistar rats [50]. In another mice model, HSC was demonstrated it could express key enzymes for catecholamine biosynthesis, and produce norepinephrine and other catecholamines. Moreover, HSC could use catecholamines to autoregulate their growth. It suggested that HSCs could act as both a direct target and a source of norepinephrine [51]. This finding helps us better understand the mechanisms involved in the development of liver fibrosis due to catecholamines. It also indicates that targeted interruption of catecholamine signaling in HSCs could serve as a potential treatment strategy to inhibit the fibrogenic reaction to liver damage [52]. This inspire us that DA as a catecholamine neurotransmitter and DRs may play a role in the liver fibrosis. In Zhao's study, D2R expression was significantly upregulated in diabetic livers and HG-treated HSCs, which can lead to liver oxidative damage and inflammation, eventually resulting in hepatic fibrosis [53]. Recently, another study confirmed that immune cells play a role in liver fibrosis. Levels of YAP in macrophages were elevated in the livers of both humans and mice affected by liver fibrosis. Macrophage-specific YAP deficiency attenuated liver fibrosis. D2R antagonists could selectively block YAP expression within in macrophages and prevent liver fibrosis in murine models [54]. These results confirmed the association between D2R and liver fibrosis. Further research is needed to explore whether other DRs are also involved in the process of liver fibrosis.
3.5. Dopamine receptors and renal fibrosis
The renal dopaminergic system plays a crucial role in preserving normal renal function and blood pressure, as well as in regulating inflammatory reactions and tissue injury [55]. DA-mediated protection against renal inflammation and tissue injury is partly derived by D2R, for disruption of the D2R gene (D22/2) was associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [56]. Jiang's study showed that the existence of certain single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the D2R gene (namely, rs6277, rs6276, and rs1800497) caused a decrease in the expression of D2R in renal proximal tubule cells. This decrease led to a pro-inflammatory phenotype, characterized by elevated levels of cytokines, chemokines, and TNF-α, as well as a pro-fibrotic phenotype, characterized by heightened TGF-β1 expression [57]. D1R is also expressed in glomerular mesangial cells and plays an important physiological role. According to recent study, there was a decrease in the production of H2S, the expression of D1R and cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE) in the renal tissues of diabetic mice and mesangial cells exposed to high levels of glucose. However, SKF38393 (a D1R agonist) and NaHS (an exogenous H2S donor) reversed the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects of high glucose. The positive impacts of SKF38393 were comparable to those of the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 in this study. As per the findings, activating the D1R-CSE/H2S pathway can reduce diabetic mesangial cell proliferation and ECM deposition in renal [58].
3.6. Mechanism by which dopamine receptors affect organ fibrosis
As previously mentioned, DR agonists or antagonists can alleviate fibrosis. Studies with an association proven between DRs and organ fibrosis are summarized in Table 1. According to the available experimental models of organ fibrosis, the mechanisms by which DRs affect organ fibrosis regression mainly include three aspects: 1. inhibition of chronic tissue injury; 2. deactivation a nd elimination of myofibroblasts; and 3. degradation of the ECM. Fig. 1 illustrates the effects of DRs on the regulation of organ fibrosis.
Table 1.
Summary of Dopamine Receptors and experimental species.
Year published | Species studied | Organ system | Results summary | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | human retinal pigmented epithelial cells (hRPECs) | Ocular | A potential advantage of fenoldopam (D5R agonist) and loxapine (D2R antagonist) in selectively inhibiting fibrotic activity in profibrotic RPE cells | [30] |
2013 | mouse | cardiac | Loss of functional D3R in mice resulted in an excessive accumulation of collagen within the interstitial space of the heart. | [35] |
2020 | mouse | cardiac | Activation of D3R signaling could protect against morphine-induced cardiac fibrosis. | [36] |
2021 | mouse | cardiac | A-68930, a specific D1R-specifific agonist, could reduce cardiac injury and fibrosis in a Doxorubicin treated mouse model | [39] |
2015 | mouse | lung | Spiperone, selective D2R antagonist, instillation separately or together with pegHYAL reduced the MSC-like cells considerably, which considered as a new strategy in treatment of pneumofibrosis. | [47] |
2019 | mouse | lung | D1R agonist selectively inhibits YAP/TAZ function in mesenchymal cells and shifts their phenotype from profibrotic to fibrosis resolving, reversing in vitro extracellular matrix stiffening and in vivo tissue fibrosis in mouse models. | [44] |
2020 | primary normal human lung fibroblasts; mouse |
lung | D1R agonist played an important role in fibrosis resolution in vitro and in vivo by mediating collagen clearance. | [45] |
2021 | human; mouse |
lung | Fenoldopam (a selective D1R agonist) and sumanirole (a selective D2R agonist) exerted potent antifibrotic effects in BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis by attenuating the differentiation and proliferation of fibroblasts. | [48] |
2021 | Mouse | Liver | D2R inhibition can reduce diabetic HSCs oxidative damage and fibrotic proliferation partly via the TGF-β1/Smads and NFκB pathways. | [53] |
2022 | Human; Mouse; Minipig |
Liver | D2R antagonist selectively targeted YAP-dependent fibrogenic crosstalk between macrophages and CTGF+VCAM1+ vascular niche, promoting liver regeneration over fibrosis in both rodent and large animal models. | [54] |
2014 | Mouse renal proximal tubule cells | Kidney | Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the D2R increase inflammation and fibrosis in Human Renal Proximal Tubule Cells. | [57] |
2022 | Mouse Glomerular mesangial cell; Mouse |
Kidney | D1R-CSE/H2S pathway activation attenuated diabetic mesangial cells proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition by down-regulating the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. | [58] |
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of dopamine receptors and organ fibrosis. D1R, dopamine D1 receptor; D2R, dopamine D2 receptor; D3R, dopamine D3 receptor; D4R, dopamine D4 receptor; D5R, dopamine D5 receptor; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-beta 1; YAP, Yes-associated protein; TAZ,transcriptional coactivator with PDZ binding motif; NLRP3, nucleotide-binding domain-like receptor protein 3.
3.7. Inhibiting chronic tissue injury
DA or agonists of DRs have been documented to regulate the progression of inflammation through interaction with its receptors [59,60]. There are five subtypes of DRs (D1R–D5R). However, only D1R has been shown to mediate the DA-induced suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome activation [61]. NLRP3 inflammasome activation is a cytosolic protein complex consisting of NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1, and its activation promotes the maturation and release of some pro-inflammatory cytokines [62]. A specific D1R-specific agonist called A-68930 can suppress the NLRP3 inflammasome in the heart via the D1R/cAMP signaling axis [38]. A-68930 interfered with the inflammatory cascade in DOX-treated H9C2 cardiac myoblasts by decreasing the levels of NLRP3 protein and subsequently reducing the initiation and progression of IL-1β and caspase-1 in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Finally, it mitigated DOX-induced cardiac damage and myocardial fibrosis. The TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway plays a role in regulating liver fibrosis [63]. Increases in the expression of D2R, NOX-5, proteins associated with inflammation (TNF-α and IL-6), and proteins associated with fibrosis (MMP-2/9, CO–I/III/IV, TGF-β1, and fibronectin) were observed in a high glucose-treated rat model. Following the use of haloperidol (an inhibitor of D2R) and n-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC, an active oxygen scavenger), these changes were reduced. Haloperidol and NAC negatively regulated the expression of TGF-β1 and phosphorylated Smad2 and the phosphorylation of NFκB-p65 and IκBα [53]. Inhibition of D2R can mitigate diabetic HSC-mediated oxidative injury and fibrotic proliferation in some cases via the TGF-β1/Smad and NFκB pathways. At present, there are no literature reported on other DRs and renal fibrosis.
3.8. Deactivation and elimination of myofibroblasts
Elevated expression of D1R and D2R can be observed in myofibroblasts found in lung tissue of individuals with IPF. FNP and SMR promoted fibroblast differentiation by adversely influencing the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway and decreasing the levels of p-Smad2 and p-Smad 3. These proteins play a crucial role in the differentiation of fibroblasts in response to TGF-β1 [64]. YAP and TAZ are transcriptional coactivators that play pathological roles in mesenchymal cell activation and fibrosis [65,66]. YAP and TAZ are involved in many mechanical and biochemical signals related to fibrosis, such as metabolic reprogramming, matrix stiffness, TGF-β expression, myocardin-related transcription factor, along with WNT signaling [67]. GPCRs are linked to effector proteins of four primary categories of G proteins: Gαs, Gαi/o, Gαq/11, and Gα12/13. A study showed that the activation of receptors coupled to Gα12/13, Gαq/11, and Gαi/o stimulated YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity; moreover, receptors coupled to Gαs inhibited YAP/TAZ nuclear localization and activity by increasing cAMP [68]. DRs are members of the GPCR superfamily. D1R selectively couples to Gαs to promote an increase in cAMP [69] and overrides various profibrotic stimuli that promote fibroblast activation, switching fibroblasts to a state that favors matrix degradation and softening. Taken together, these findings revealed that a fibroblast-selective D1R agonist could reverse profibrotic phenotypes and promote matrix degradation by inhibiting YAP/TAZ nuclear localization in fibroblasts in experimental lung and liver fibrosis models [43].
3.9. Degradation of extracellular matrix
Imbalances in the deposition and resorption of ECM are the main characteristics of fibrotic diseases. The ECM is a complicated structure made up of collagen and fibronectin. This dynamic process is driven by the harmonized release and activation of cysteine cathepsins and matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), and the subsequent collagen internalization. Fibroblasts are responsible for classic ECM resorption, which involves internalization of collagen into lysosomes [70]. Cathepsin K is a key effector proteases involved in the degradation of both extracellular and intracellular collagen I [71], and is therefore related to collagen I clearance [72]. Dihydrexidine, a D1R agonist, could promote fibroblast-mediated breakdown of collagen I originating from cells through the activation of cathepsin K by targeting D1R.The primary pathological alterations linked to diabetic nephropathy involve the proliferation of glomerular mesangial cells (MC) and the ECM deposition. Under physiological conditions, MCs can proliferate abnormally and secrete significant quantities of ECM [73]. The CSE/H2S pathway of D1R activation hinders the collagen deposition caused by high glucose in MCs. D1R could increase endogenous H2S production by increasing Ca2+, which inhibits the proliferation of MC, and attenuate ECM deposition through the downregulation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway [58].
4. Perspectives
Despite increasing evidence demonstrating that DA and its receptors may help to regulate organ fibrosis, challenges wait to be resolved to develop effective anti-fibrotic therapies. First, animal models and ex vivo cultures of primary human tissues should be developed to better translate new mechanisms to clinical use. Second, selecting patients for clinical trials is challenging due to patient heterogeneity and the slow progression of fibrosis. Organ fibrosis is considered a highly complex disorder. With more research focused on mechanisms that drive fibrosis progression, more approaches will be developed to provide effective antifibrotic therapies in the future.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
ZhongLi Liao: Writing – original draft. XueFeng Tang: Writing – original draft. Bin Yang: Supervision, Project administration. Jian Yang: Supervision, Conceptualization.
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
None.
Funding
The study was supported by grants from the Special Key Projects for Technological Innovation and Application Development of Chongqing (grant number [2022TIAD-KPX0243]).
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the Special Key Projects for Technological Innovation and Application Development of Chongqing.
Contributor Information
Bin Yang, Email: yangbin4332@Outlook.com.
Jian Yang, Email: jianyang@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.
Abbreviations
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- DA
Dopamine
- D1R
dopamine D1 receptor
- D1R
dopamine D2 receptor
- D1R
dopamine D3 receptor
- D1R
dopamine D4 receptor
- D1R
dopamine D5 receptor
- DRs
dopamine receptors
- GPCRs
G protein-coupled receptors
- CNS
central nervous system
- RPE
retinal pigmented epithelial
- TGF-β
transforming growth factor beta
- DOX
doxorubicin
- NLRP3
nucleotide-binding domain-like receptor protein 3
- IPF
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- BLM
bleomycin
- YAP
Yes-associated protein
- TAZ
transcriptional coactivator with PDZ binding motif
- pegHYAL
pegylated hyaluronidase
- HSCs
hepatic stellate cells
- CSE
cystathionine-γ-lyase
- FNP
Fenoldopam
- SMR
sumanirole
Data availability
No data was used for the research described in the article.
References
- 1.Rockey D.C., Bell P.D., Hill J.A. Fibrosis--a common pathway to organ injury and failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1138–1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1300575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Henderson N.C., Rieder F., Wynn T.A. Fibrosis: from mechanisms to medicines. Nature. 2020;587:555–566. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2938-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weiskirchen R., Weiskirchen S., Tacke F. Organ and tissue fibrosis: molecular signals, cellular mechanisms and translational implications. Mol. Aspect. Med. 2019;65:2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gurtner G.C., Werner S., Barrandon Y., et al. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453:314–321. doi: 10.1038/nature07039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Horowitz J.C., Thannickal V.J. Mechanisms for the resolution of organ fibrosis. Physiology. 2019;34:43–55. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00033.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Campos J., Pacheco R. Involvement of dopaminergic signaling in the cross talk between the renin-angiotensin system and inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol. 2020;42 doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00819-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bucolo Claudio, Leggio Gian Marco, Drago Filippo, et al. Dopamine outside the brain: the eye, cardiovascular system and endocrine pancreas. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019;203 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cavallotti Carlo, Mancone Massimo, Bruzzone Paolo, et al. Dopamine receptor subtypes in the native human heart. Heart Ves. 2010;25:432–437. doi: 10.1007/s00380-009-1224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meneely Samantha, Dinkins Mai-Lynne, Kassai Miki, et al. Differential dopamine D1 and D3 receptor modulation and expression in the spinal cord of two mouse models of restless legs syndrome. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018;12:199. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zeng Chunyu, Eisner Gilbert M., Felder Robin A. Dopamine receptor and hypertension. Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents. 2005;3:69–77. doi: 10.2174/1568016052773289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gingrich J.A., Caron M.G. Recent advances in the molecular biology of dopamine receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1993;16:299–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Radl D., Chiacchiaretta M., Lewis R.G. Differential regulation of striatal motor behavior and related cellular responses by dopamine D2L and D2S isoforms. Pro Natl Acad U S A. 2018;115:198–203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717194115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leggio G.M., Bucolo C., Platania C.B. Current drug treatments targeting dopamine D3 receptor. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016;165:164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beaulieu J.M., Gainetdinov R.R. The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011;63:182–217. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.002642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bucolo C., Leggio G.M., Maltese A., et al. Dopamine-(3) receptor modulates intraocular pressure: implications for glaucoma. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012;83:680–686. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee Samuel P., So Christopher H., Rashid Asim J., et al. Dopamine D1 and D2 receptor co-activation generates a novel phospholipase C-mediated calcium signal. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:35671–35678. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401923200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fiorentini C., Busi C., Gorruso E., et al. Reciprocal regulation of dopamine D1 and D3 receptor function and traffificking by heterodimerization. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008;74:59–69. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.043885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Belkacemi Louiza, Darmani Nissar A. Dopamine receptors in emesis: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic function. Pharmacol. Res. 2020;161 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sidhu A., Niznik H.B. Coupling of dopamine receptor subtypes to multiple and diverse G proteins. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2000;18:669–677. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(00)00033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brown K.M., Lee L.C., Findlay J.E., et al. Cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase, PDE8A1, is activated by protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1631–1637. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Luo Y., Kokkonen G.C., Wang X., et al. D2 dopamine receptors stimulate mitogenesis through pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins and Ras-involved ERK and SAP/JNK pathways in rat C6-D2L glioma cells. J. Neurochem. 1998;71:980–990. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71030980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brami-Cherrier K., Valjent E., Garcia M., et al. Dopamine induces a PI3-kinase-independent activation of Akt in striatal neurons: a new route to cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:8911–8921. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-20-08911.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Senogles S.E. The D2 dopamine receptor stimulates phospholipase D activity: a novel signaling pathway for dopamine. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000;58:455–462. doi: 10.1124/mol.58.2.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Everett P.B., Senogles S.E. D3 dopamine receptor activates phospholipase D through a pertussis toxin-insensitive pathway. Neurosci. Lett. 2004;371:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Darmani N.A., Zhong W., Chebolu S., et al. Broad-spectrum antiemetic potential of the L-type calcium channel antagonist nifedipine and evidence for its additive antiemetic interaction with the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist palonosetron in the least shrew (Cryptotisparva) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014;722:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Perez M.F., Ford K.A., Goussakov, et al. Repeated cocaine exposure decreases dopamine D₂-like receptor modulation of Ca(2+) homeostasis in rat nucleus accumbens neurons. Synapse. 2011;65:168180168–168180180. doi: 10.1002/syn.20831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Friedlander M. Fibrosis and diseases of the eye. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:576–586. doi: 10.1172/JCI31030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Seagle B.L.L., Rezai K.A., Kobori Y., et al. Melanin photoprotection in the human retinal pigment epithelium and its correlation with light-induced cell apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102:8978–8983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501971102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ming M., Li X.P., Fan X.L., et al. Retinal pigment epithelial cells secrete neurotrophic factors and synthesize dopamine: possible contribution to therapeutic effects of RPE cell transplantation in Parkinson's disease. J. Transl. Med. 2009;7:53. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gao Ashley Y., Link Patrick A., Bakri Sophie J., et al. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2022;323:C116–C124. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00468.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gao A.Y., Whaley M.G., Saraf N., Bakri S.J., Haak A.J. Survey of dopamine receptor D2 antagonists as retinal antifibrotics. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Therapeut. 2024;40:536542536–536542542. doi: 10.1089/jop.2024.0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gómez Maria de Jesus, Rousseau Guy, Nadeau Réginald, et al. Functional and autoradiographic characterization of dopamine D2-like receptors in the Guinea pig heart. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2002;80:578–587. doi: 10.1139/y02-081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kisling Andrew, Byrne Shannon, Parekh Rohan U., et al. Loss of function in dopamine D3 receptor attenuates left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts migration and proliferation in vitro. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.732282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grilo G., Shaver P., Clemens S., et al. The roles of dopamine receptor 3 in age- and sex-dependent left ventricular remodeling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2017;112:148–149. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johnson Tracy L., Tulis David A., Keeler Benjamin E., et al. The dopamine D3 receptor knockout mouse mimics aging related changes in autonomic function and cardiac fibrosis. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gaweda Gabriel, Iyer Rugmani P., Shaver Patti R., et al. Dopamine receptor D3 agonist (Pramipexole) reduces morphineinduced cardiac fibrosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;529:1080–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cao J.Y., Zhou L.T., Li Z.L., et al. Dopamine D1 receptor agonist A68930 attenuates acute kidney injury by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;143:226e233. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2020.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yamaguchi T., Sumida T.S., Nomura S., et al. Cardiac dopamine D1 receptor triggers ventricular arrhythmia in chronic heart failure. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4364. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18128-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu Jiao, Jin Yuxuan, Wang Bei, et al. Dopamine D1 receptor alleviates doxorubicin-induced cardiac injury by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;561:7e13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.04.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rodgers H.M., Yow J., Evans E., et al. Dopamine D1 and D3 receptor modulators restore morphine analgesia and prevent opioid preference in a model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience. 2019;406:376–388. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Martinez F.J., Collard H.R., Pardo A., et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Amenta F., Ricci A., Tayebati S.K., et al. The peripheral dopaminergic system: morphological analysis, functional and clinical applications, Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. 2002;107:145–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Haak A.J., Ducharme M.T., Diaz Espinosa A.M., et al. Targeting GPCR signaling for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis therapies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;41:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Haak A.J., Kostallari E., Sicard D., et al. Selective YAP/TAZ inhibition in fibroblasts via dopamine receptor D1 agonism reverses fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau6296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Diaz-Espinosa Ana M., Link Patrick A., Sicard Delphine, et al. Dopamine D1 receptor stimulates cathepsin K-dependent degradation and resorption of collagen I in lung fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 2020;133 doi: 10.1242/jcs.248278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vidak E., Javorsek U., Vizovisek M., et al. Cysteine cathepsins and their extracellular roles: shaping the microenvironment. Cells. 2019;8:264. doi: 10.3390/cells8030264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Germanovich Skurikhin Evgenii, Pershina Olga Victorovna, Mikhaylovna Reztsova Alena, et al. Modulation of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis by pegylated hyaluronidase and dopamine receptor antagonist in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mou Yong, Liu Juan, Pan Ting, et al. Dopamine receptor agonists ameliorate bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by repressing fibroblast differentiation and proliferation. Biomedicine & harmacotherapy. 2021;139 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Friedman S.L. Molecular regulation of hepatic fibrosis, an integrated cellular response to tissue injury. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:2247–2250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dubuisson Liliane, Desmoulière Alexis, Decourt Boris, et al. Inhibition of rat liver fibrogenesis through noradrenergic antagonism. Hepatology. 2002;35:325–331. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.31166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Oben J.A., Roskams T., Yang S., et al. Hepatic fibrogenesis requires sympathetic neurotransmitters. Gut. 2004;53:438–445. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.026658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Papatheodorou K., Papanas N., Banach M., et al. Complications of diabetes. J. Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2016/6989453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhao Bingbing, Li Siwei, Guo Zuoming, et al. Dopamine receptor D2 inhibition alleviates diabetic hepatic stellate cells fibrosis by regulating the TGF-β1/Smads and NFκB pathways. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2021;48:370380370–370380380. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Qing J., Ren Y., Zhang Y., et al. Dopamine receptor D2 antagonism normalizes profibrotic macrophage-endothelial crosstalk in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 2022;76:394406394–394406406. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang Jian, Villar Van Anthony M., Jose Pedro A., et al. Renal dopamine receptors and oxidative stress: role in hypertension. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2021;34:716–735. doi: 10.1089/ars.2020.8106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang Y., Cuevas S., Asico L.D., et al. Deficient dopamine D2 receptor function causes renal inflammation independently of high blood pressure. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jiang X., Konkalmatt P., Yang Y., et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the dopamine D2 receptor increase inflammation and fibrosis in human renal proximal tubule cells. Hypertension. 2014;63:e74–e80. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li HongZhu, Sun FengQi, Bai ShuZhi, et al. The DR1-CSE/H2S system inhibits renal fibrosis by downregulating the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in diabetic mice. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2022;49:7. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.5062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Torres-Rosas R., Yehia G., Pena G., et al. Dopamine mediates vagal modulation of the immune system by electroacupuncture. Nat. Med. 2014;20:291–295. doi: 10.1038/nm.3479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Perry V.H. Innate inflflammation in Parkinson's disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012;2 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yan Yiqing, Jiang Wei, Liu Lei, et al. Dopamine controls systemic inflammation through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell. 2015;160:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Davis B.K., Wen H., Ting J.P. The inflflammasome NLRs in immunity, inflflammation, and associated diseases. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:707–735. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Xu Fengyun, Liu Changwei, Zhou Dandan, et al. TGF-beta/SMAD pathway and its regulation in hepatic fibrosis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2016;64:157–167. doi: 10.1369/0022155415627681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Barnes J.L., Gorin Y. Myofibroblast differentiation during fibrosis: role of NAD(P)H oxidases. Kidney Int. 2011;79:944–956. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu F., Lagares D., Choi K.M., et al. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ drives fibroblast activation and fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2015;308:L344–L357. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00300.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liang M., Yu M., Xia R., et al. Yap/Taz deletion in Gli+ cell-derived myofibroblasts attenuates fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;28:3278–3290. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015121354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Piersma B., Bank R.A., Boersema M. Signaling in fibrosis: TGF-β, WNT, and YAP/TAZ converge. Front. Med. 2015;2:59. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yu F.-X., Zhao B., Panupinthu N., et al. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Cell. 2012;150:780–791. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Flock T., Hauser A.S., Lund N., et al. Selectivity determinants of GPCR–G-protein binding. Nature. 2017;545:317–322. doi: 10.1038/nature22070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bonnans C., Chou J., Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:786–801. doi: 10.1038/nrm3904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sprangers S., Everts V. Molecular pathways of cell-mediated degradation of fibrillar collagen. Matrix Biol. 2019;75–76:190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vidak E., Javorsek U., Vizovisek M. Cysteine cathepsins and their extracellular roles: shaping the microenvironment. Cells. 2019;8:264. doi: 10.3390/cells8030264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Abboud H.E. Mesangial cell biology. Exp. Cell Res. 2012;318:979–985. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.