Skip to main content
Tumour Virus Research logoLink to Tumour Virus Research
. 2025 Jan 2;19:200312. doi: 10.1016/j.tvr.2024.200312

Rapid-onset cancer

Andrea Bilger 1,, Paul F Lambert 1
PMCID: PMC11764593  PMID: 39755235

Abstract

Human cancers are generally thought to develop over the course of decades. Such slow progression is well documented for a variety of cancers that we designate “slow-onset” cancers. “Rapid-onset” cancers, in contrast, can develop in a matter of months in humans or in as little as 9 days in mice. These cancers often develop under conditions that might be expected to accelerate cancer development: early development, immune deficiency, or viral infection. We will discuss rapid-onset cancers in the context of the "hallmarks of cancer" – properties cells must acquire in order to become malignant – focusing on how viruses are particularly well suited to causing rapid-onset cancer.

Keywords: Rapid, Slow, Onset, Cancer, Virus, Congenital, Carcinogenesis

1. What is “rapid-onset" cancer?

To understand what it means for a cancer to develop rapidly, we need to know what it means for cancers to develop slowly. This review will summarize some of the decades of data on cancer development in tissues where available evidence supports a multistep process that requires decades in people or several months in rodent models: “slow onset” cancers. We will then describe a variety of “rapid onset” cancers: genetically engineered, congenital, and virus-induced cancers in patients and/or animals where onset occurs in as little as months in people or weeks in animal models. Some of these rapid-onset cancers are also "early-onset" cancers – cancers that develop in young patients or animals; others – particularly virus-induced cancers – can develop rapidly even in adults.

2. Multistep carcinogenesis: “slow-onset cancer”

Cancer is generally considered a disease of aging, with a median age at diagnosis in the United States of 67 [1,2]. In the 1950s, analysis of cancer mortality statistics, relating the frequency of deaths from cancer to the age of those deaths, suggested that many cancers result from the accumulation of six to seven mutations [1]. A correction for mutations that confer a proliferative advantage reduced this number to 4–5 mutations per cancer cell [2]. Mutational analysis has largely validated this hypothesis for a variety of cancers, revealing an average of 4–5 cancer driver mutations – including mutations that confer a proliferative advantage – for nearly 2700 cancers of 38 types [3].

Analyses of cancer latency in cases likely initiated by exposure to chemicals such as asbestos (mesothelioma) or arsenic (bladder cancer) suggest such cancers develop over the course of decades, with a median time to onset of 40+ years [[4], [5], [6], [7]]. Analyses of lesions of increasing dysplasia, some longitudinal, have confirmed that many types of cancer evolve slowly, through the stepwise accumulation of mutations. Such multistep carcinogenesis has been described for colorectal, head-and-neck, and a variety of other cancers [[8], [9], [10], [11]].

In mice, cancers induced by chemical carcinogenesis develop months or more after carcinogen treatment. When adult mice susceptible to liver cancer (F1 hybrids of the inbred C57BL/6 and C3H/He strains) were treated with a nearly lethal dose of the carcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DEN), hepatocellular carcinomas - the most common carcinogen-induced cancer in the National Toxicology Program’s two-year bioassay - were diagnosed more than 14 months later [12]. Treating pre-weanling mice with a lower dose of DEN and assessing lesions at regular intervals reveals preneoplastic lesion development by 10 weeks and hepatocellular carcinoma by 20 weeks in susceptible males [13]. Chronic treatment with the carcinogen 4-NQO in drinking water yields oral cancers in adult mice on a similar timeline, with dysplasia developing at 8 weeks and cancer at 20 weeks or more [14].

2.1. The "slow-onset" colorectal cancer paradigm

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has provided a paradigm for understanding slow-onset, multistep carcinogenesis [10,11,15]. Analysis of a range of tumors from small, benign adenomas to large cancers has yielded a robust composite profile in which the first step generally consists of activation of the WNT signaling pathway (mutated in ∼93 % of CRCs), commonly via mutation of the APC (Adenomatous Polyposis Coli) tumor suppressor gene [11,15]. Later steps involve growth promotion via gain-of-function mutations in the RAS and/or PI3K signaling pathways and mutation of TP53, suppressing apoptosis and promoting invasion (Figure) [11,[15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. Mutations that disrupt DNA repair generally lead to mutations arising in the same pathways [15]. Recent DNA sequencing confirmed that the accumulation of genetic changes relevant to colon cancer correlates with time. Intestinal crypts of people from 11 to 78 years old harbor a variety of mutations, including mutations in driver genes and whole-chromosome copy number changes, that accumulate with age [21].

Figure.

Figure

Time as a factor in acquiring the classic hallmarks of cancer in multi-step colorectal cancer relative to virally induced cancer. Left: Colorectal cancer develops over time, with mutations acquired in multiple steps [10,[16], [17], [18], [19]]. Each concentric central circle represents a critical genetic change, with larger circles representing later changes. The "Time" axis is shown as a dotted blue line. Right: The central circle represents multiple genetic changes that occur simultaneously with papillomavirus infection. High-risk human papillomaviruses such as HPV 16 express multiple oncogenic proteins – E5, E6, and E7 – soon after infection. Each of these proteins affects one or more hallmarks of cancer [22,23].

2.2. Germline APC mutations

The time of initial mutation for some colorectal cancers is known. Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (FAP) carry a germline mutation in the APC gene [11], which is mutated in ∼77 % of colorectal cancers [15]. Congenital mutation of APC leads to the development of tens to thousands of polyps in teenagers. A subset of these tumors go on to become malignant, with an average age of colorectal cancer diagnosis of approximately 40 [24]. However, colorectal cancer has been detected in children with FAP as young as 9 [25].

Inherited mutations that cause hypermutation, such as inactivation of DNA repair genes in Lynch Syndrome patients, also accelerate colorectal carcinogenesis [11,24]. Lynch Syndrome patients develop far fewer tumors than FAP patients. This suggests that APC mutation more frequently initiates neoplastic growth than DNA repair mutation does, as might be expected: whereas APC directly suppresses tumor initiation via the WNT pathway, tumor initiation in response to DNA repair protein loss requires an additional step in which loss of DNA repair leads to mutation of oncogenic or tumor suppressor proteins such as APC. However, the mutator phenotype of Lynch Syndrome appears to accelerate tumor progression – resulting in a similar age of colorectal cancer diagnosis for FAP and Lynch Syndrome patients [11,24].

Mutation of Apc in mice causes intestinal polyposis much like that seen in FAP patients [26]. Polyps remain benign for the first 4 months after birth but can become invasive by approximately 8 months of age [27]. The difference in time to onset between humans and mice with inherited mutations in APC/Apc correlates with a general difference in susceptibility to oncogenic transformation between human and mouse cells, with mouse cells transforming more easily – at least in part due to a qualitative difference in telomerase expression [28].

2.3. “Slow onset:” ∼40 years

From these detailed studies of colorectal carcinogenesis and the longitudinal tracking of people and animals exposed to chemicals such as asbestos, arsenic, and DEN, we have a baseline for “slow-onset cancer.” Such cancers develop over approximately 40 years in people, whether initiated due to mutations present at birth in the case of FAP and Lynch Syndrome patients, or later in life due to chemical exposure. In mice, comparable mutations lead to malignancy in approximately 6 months.

3. Rapid-onset cancer

While many cancers evolve over decades, others develop remarkably rapidly – in as little as months in people or weeks in animals. Cancer can be induced rapidly by engineering cells to carry the same set of driver mutations identified in slow-onset cancers. But rapid-onset cancers can also arise more naturally. Some develop in the presence of factors that would be expected to accelerate carcinogenesis based on their ability to affect multiple hallmarks of cancer simultaneously, such as embryonic development or viral infection. Others develop in the event of immune deficiency, which eliminates the need to evade immune destruction – one of the emerging hallmarks of cancer [19]. Yet others involve combinations of these factors.

3.1. Genetically engineered cancers

Many species, from zebrafish to pigs, have been engineered to carry transgenic oncogenes and/or mutated tumor suppressors that are known to drive slow-onset cancers [[29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]]. Eliminating the requirement for time to accumulate these changes dramatically accelerates carcinogenesis [29,31,33,34].

A particularly rapid-onset adult mouse model combines several changes known to occur in cervical cancer: expression of the viral oncogenes HPV16 E6 and E7, activating mutation of the cellular proto-oncogene Kras, and knockout of the tumor suppressor gene Pten [29,35]. These changes require excision of floxed "stop" sequences knocked into the endogenous, mutated Kras locus and inserted in an HPV E6 and E7 transgene driven by the Keratin 14 promoter, and excision of a floxed exon of Pten (Table). These mutations can be induced nearly simultaneously by delivery of adeno-Cre to the cervicovaginal mucosa of adult mice. Mice treated with adeno-Cre become moribund due to invasive cancer as soon as 23 days after treatment [29] (personal communication). These results indicate that these 4 genetic changes are sufficient to cause malignancy without a time lag. Heterozygosity of Pten, or the absence of E6 and E7 or mutated Kras, delayed tumor development by one to several months. The longest delay in visible tumor development, 9 months, was caused by absence of E6 and E7 expression [29].

Table.

1Rapid-onset cancer.

Category Cancer Species Age Average or modal age at diagnosis Earliest diagnosis found in literature Frequent genetic changes Frequent spontaneous regression References
Genetically Engineered Cervicovaginal Mouse Adult 53 days post inductiona 23 days post inductiona Induced HPV16 E6, E7, KrasG12D; PTEN−/− No [29]
Genetically Engineered Mammary Mouse Pup/Adult 8–12 weeks ∼21 days MMTV-PyMT; Chr. 11 amplification; Ptprh mutation No [[36], [37], [38]]
Congenital/Pediatric Retinoblastoma (bilateral) Human Infant 12–14 months 20 day old infant RB−/−; MYCN amplification No [47,48]
Congenital/Pediatric Neuroblastoma Human Infant 17 months 4 day old infant MYCN amplification/overexpression Yes [50,51,102,103]
Congenital/Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma Human Fetus/Child <10 years 20 week fetus Maternal chr. 11p loss No [62,63]
Congenital/Pediatric Melanoma Human Child 12 years 6 week old infant MAPK, PI3K pathway mutations (N/H/KRAS, BRAF, NF1) Yes [[65], [66], [67], [68],70]
Congenital/Pediatric Melanoma Pig (MeLiM) Piglet 0–2 months Birth Candidates on Chr 2,5 7, 8, 16 Yes [67]
Marek's Disease Virus T-cell Lymphoma Chicken Chick 32–50 days. post infection 16 days post infection ND No [85,104]
Murine Leukemia Virus Myeloid Leukemia Mouse Adult 38 days 9–15 days post infection ND No [81,83]
Mouse Papillomavirus Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mouse Adult 2 weeks post infection 2 weeks post infection ND Yes [89]
EBV B-cell Lymphoma Human Immune-suppressed Adult 4.3 months post transplant 2 months post transplant ND No [91]
EBV B-cell Lymphoma Human cord blood cells in Mouse Immune-deficient Adult 28–35 days post infection 28 days post infection ND No [92]

ND: Not Determined.

a

Age when moribund.

Similarly, simultaneous expression of the three most frequent mutated genes found in human colorectal cancer - Apc, Kras, and Tp53 - causes rapid-onset cancer in mice [17]. Organoids of engineered cells carrying mutant Apc, inducible mutant Kras, and inducible mutant Tp53, implanted orthotopically in the mouse colon, yield stage 1 cancers within 4 weeks of Cre-mediated mutant KRAS and TP53 induction [17].

A third rapid-onset model relies entirely on the expression of a single viral gene encoding the mouse polyomavirus middle T antigen (PyMT), which acts as a scaffold signal adaptor and activates SRC and SRC-like tyrosine kinases [36] (Table). Mouse PyMT expressed constitutively can induce tumors of a variety of cell types, including mammary cancers when PyMT is expressed from a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter [[36], [37], [38]]. Cancers induced in this model frequently show Chromosome 11 amplification, which is associated with PI3K pathway activation due to ERBB2 amplification [37]. The vast majority of MMTV-PyMT-induced tumors also carry mutations in the Ptprh gene that lead to constitutive activation of EGFR [37]. PyMT-induced mammary cancers can develop as early as 3 weeks after birth [38].

3.2. Congenital and perinatal cancers

Approximately 130 malignant solid tumors are diagnosed in fetuses or newborns in the United States each year [39]. Some of these cancers are unique to early development, requiring transformation of a transient cell type, while others involve earlier onset of cancers also diagnosed in adults. While critical tumor suppressors have been identified for many of these cancers, including retinoblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma, the details of their genetic/epigenetic routes to carcinogenesis are generally not well understood [40,41]. However, it is clear that the sets of mutations that drive pediatric cancers only partially overlap with those that drive adult cancers [40,42,43]. Here we review a selection of rapid-onset cancers comprised of congenital and perinatal cancers notable for their historic importance in cancer genetics (retinoblastoma), frequency (neuroblastoma), particularly early onset (rhabdomyosarcoma), spontaneous regression (neuroblastoma, melanoma), and spontaneous occurrence in both people and robust animal models (melanoma).

3.2.1. Retinoblastoma (humans)

Analysis of retinoblastoma genetics gave rise to the concept of a tumor "suppressor" [44]. Retinoblastoma is a cancer of the retina, most likely derived from cone cell precursors [45,46]. The median age at diagnosis of familial, bilateral retinoblastoma is 12–14 months in the US and Canada but can be as early as 20 days [47,48] (Table). Retinoblastoma develops due to mutation of the Retinoblastoma (RB1) gene and consequent loss of RB protein, which regulates the cell cycle. Retinoma is a benign precursor of retinoblastoma that involves disruption of both alleles of the RB1 gene [49]. Loss of RB protein is therefore not sufficient to cause malignancy. Retinoblastomas carry additional mutations, such as the amplification of Chromosome 2p carrying MYCN. Knockdown of MYCN restricts the growth of retinoblastoma cells [45,49].

Familial retinoblastoma appears analogous in some ways to colorectal cancer in FAP patients: both cancers are initiated by an inherited, heterozygous mutation in a tumor suppressor gene. Both involve the loss of the remaining allele in the development of a benign tumor. However, lesions can become malignant by 20 days of age in retinoblastoma patients, while FAP patients rarely develop colorectal cancer as early as 9 years of age. The reason for this difference in the rapidity of cancer onset has not been determined. Cone cell precursors in the retina may be particularly susceptible to carcinogenesis caused by the loss of RB because of elevated expression of MYCN and MDM2 and downregulation of p27 (CDKN1B) with cone cell maturation [46].

3.2.2. Neuroblastoma (humans)

Neuroblastoma is a cancer of the sympathetic nervous system, typically occurring in the adrenal medulla and the paraspinal sympathetic ganglia [50,51]. Neuroblastoma is the most common cancer diagnosed in children under 1 year old [52]. Many neuroblastomas, including Stage IV, are diagnosed in children 0–5 months old [53] (Table). Very young patients (<1 year) are disproportionately likely to have a special form of Stage IV cancer designated Stage IVS (“S” for “Special”), in which infants have tumors in multiple tissues [51,53]. Notably, these Stage IVS cancers generally regress spontaneously. Spontaneous regression might be due to a reversal of replicative immortality caused by epigenetic reduction of telomerase activity [50,51]. High-risk neuroblastomas that do not regress frequently carry rearrangements of the TERT gene, with concomitant increased expression and activity of the encoded telomerase [54,55].

Neuroblastoma development is still poorly understood: no minimal set of drivers has been defined [50,51]. Most neuroblastomas amplify MYCN or delete miRNAs that bind to MYCN mRNA, suggesting that MYCN is a key driver. Expression of the pluripotent regulator LIN28B, which increases MYC expression, can initiate neuroblastoma development in transgenic mice [56]. Mutations in ALK (Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase) are associated with familial neuroblastoma, but this gene is rarely mutated somatically [50,51]. Expression of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway mRNAs is also frequently upregulated. Chromosome 17q is amplified in the vast majority of neuroblastomas, and 11q, carrying a negative regulator of MYCN expression, is lost in about half. However, 10–30 % of neuroblastomas have no large-scale genetic aberrations, somatic mutations are infrequent, few genes are recurrently mutated, and – for high-risk neuroblastomas in older children – there is no correlation between age at diagnosis and mutation frequency [50,51,57]. These observations raise an alternative explanation in which epigenetic abnormalities during development might be involved in the initiation of neuroblastoma tumorigenesis [50,51,57]. Alternatively, cancer development might involve mutation of micro-protein-coding open reading frames not previously recognized as genes, as has recently been shown for medulloblastoma [58].

3.2.3. Rhabdomyosarcoma (humans)

Rhabdomyosarcomas are cancers that appear to derive from muscle, with a median age of onset of 15 years [59]. However, some of these cancers develop within weeks or months in utero (Table). In one case, a fetus with no visible tumor at 28 weeks was found to have a 12 × 5.4 cm tumor at 33 weeks and died with diffusely spread tumor by 34 weeks of gestation [60]. In a second case, a tumor was detected in an 18-week fetus during a routine ultrasound. When the pregnancy was terminated 2 weeks later, the fetus was diagnosed with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma [61].

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, found almost exclusively in patients less than 10 years old, has a different genetic profile than the alveolar subtype found mostly in patients over 10 [62]. Over 60 % of both types of rhabdomyosarcoma have lost the maternal chromosome 11p (most with duplication of the paternal chromosome), including the imprinted region on 11p15.5 that carries the maternally expressed tumor suppressor gene H19 that encodes a regulatory untranslated RNA [63]. The alveolar subtype as a rule involves a gene fusion (PAX3-FOXO1 or PAX7-FOXO1) that is diagnostic and oncogenic, but not sufficient for tumorigenesis in vivo (shown for the more potent PAX3-FOXO1 fusion) [64]. Small subsets of embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas have mutations such as activated RAS genes or other known drivers; however not all do [62,63]. This suggests that the large-scale genomic aberrations that are more prevalent in the embryonal subtype than in the alveolar subtype, such as amplification of multiple chromosomes, are likely to be critical in the development of rapid-onset rhabdomyosarcomas [62].

3.2.4. Melanoma (human, pig)

Childhood melanomas have an average onset of about 12 years; however, some develop within the first year of life [65,66] (Table). These infancy-onset melanomas often arise from large congenital melanocytic lesions (nevi) that derive from neural crest cells, develop in utero, and differ histopathologically from adult melanomas [65,67,68]. Most of these congenital precancerous lesions affect the MAPK pathway, carrying activating NRAS (80 %) or BRAF (10 %) mutations. Nevi that develop postnatally carry these same mutations in inverse proportion (5 % and 80 %, respectively). Some nevi carry neither NRAS nor BRAF mutations but instead involve gene fusions that lead to overexpression of part of the ALK gene also associated with familial neuroblastoma [50,51,65,67,68].

One particularly aggressive case of melanoma was detected at 6 weeks of age. This cancer involved a ZEB2:ALK fusion gene, as well as amplifications of parts of chromosomes 6p and 11q that are frequently seen in melanoma in addition to other chromosomal aberrations [66]. ZEB2 (zinc finger E−box-binding homeobox 2) is often highly expressed in melanomas and is a 5′ fusion partner in other chimeric oncogenes in a variety of cancers [66]. In the 6-week-old infant with melanoma and a second case occurring at 10 months, a ZEB2:ALK fusion were found in associated benign tumors, up to 10 months before malignancy was detected. This suggests that the fusion is not sufficient for malignancy. No additional somatic sequence changes were detected in these infant melanomas, suggesting that some of the other chromosomal aberrations that were found - amplifications and losses - or epigenetic factors were critical factors in progression [66].

Melanoma-bearing Lipichov Mini-pigs (MeLiM) and the related Sinclair mini-pigs also develop melanoma congenitally, as in humans, with diagnosis at birth or within the first 2 postnatal months [67] (Table). These melanomas resemble their human counterparts histopathologically and immunohistochemically, and they can metastasize to a variety of organs [67]. A number of chromosomal alterations, but no confirmed driver mutations, have been identified [67]. Notably, as is true of neural-crest-cell-derived neuroblastomas, these congenital cancers frequently regress spontaneously - even when metastatic [67,69]. Melanoma regression in pigs correlates with early macrophage infiltration and later T-cell infiltration [67,69]. Regression usually results in depigmentation of the entire animal, indicating that both normal and cancerous melanocytes are targeted. Depigmentation also correlates with spontaneous or immunotherapeutic regression in humans, where regression correlates with an increase in T cell infiltration - particularly CD8+ cytotoxic T cells - as in pigs [69,70]. Regression generally occurs between the second and sixth months, with temporary relapses frequently occurring before complete regression in the MeLim model [67].

3.3. Viral infection

The seven known oncogenic human viruses, including EBV (Epstein-Barr virus) and HPV (Human Papillomavirus), are increasingly recognized for their ability to induce multiple hallmarks of cancer [19,22,23,[71], [72], [73], [74]]. Oncogenic viruses express proteins that, among other functions, inhibit apoptosis; enable immune evasion; induce angiogenesis; promote inflammation; cause immortalization; induce chromosomal instability and epigenetic reprogramming; promote invasion and metastasis; induce metabolic reprogramming; and increase proliferation (Figure) [23,[71], [72], [73], [74], [75]].

Oncogenic viruses induce multiple hallmarks of cancer at least in part by targeting multiple tumor suppressors and proto-oncogenes [22]. Examples include: HPV16 proteins E5, E6, and E7 promoting proliferation via the EGFR signaling pathway and inactivating the tumor suppressors TP53 and RB (Figure) [22,76], and EBV proteins LMP-1 and LMP-2 suppressing apoptosis via NFKB and promoting proliferation via the PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways [22].

It seems logical that if viruses can target multiple tumor suppressors and oncogenes, inducing multiple hallmarks of cancer, they should also accelerate carcinogenesis relative to the multistep slow-onset model (Figure). Some data argue against such acceleration: while the median age of HPV infection that leads to cancer is estimated to be 21 years, the median age at which cancer is detected, depending on the tissue, is 50–68 years [77,78]. This 30–50 year lag time matches that of slow-onset cancers. However, observations in both animals and people indicate that viruses can cause cancer much more rapidly.

Below, we describe notable examples from decades of publications on rapid-onset virus-associated cancers. Much of the literature describing these cancers involves experimental animals, where the time of infection can be determined precisely and even very small lesions can be analyzed to assess malignancy. Whereas slow-onset, chemically induced malignancy in small animals requires 4 months or more (see above), virus-induced cancers can develop within little over a week. Many of these animal studies, as well as cases of human patients with rapid-onset viral cancer, have involved infection under conditions where one of the hallmarks of cancer might be achieved without mutation, with developing tumors benefitting from the rapid proliferation associated with embryonic or early postnatal tissue growth, the natural invasiveness of infected immune cells, or the susceptibility of immune-deficiency [36,[79], [80], [81]].

3.3.1. Murine leukemia virus (mouse)

Murine Leukemia Viruses (MLVs) are retroviruses found as integrated proviruses in most inbred mouse strains [82]. In what might be the most rapid documented onset of cancer, leukemia filtrate from the RF/Up strain caused myeloid leukemia in adult mice as soon as 9 days post intravenous injection [81] (Table). Injection of virus derived from the RFM/Un strain yielded comparably rapid-onset leukemias (as early as 15 days post infection; Table) [83].

MLV carcinogenesis has been ascribed to viral integration near cellular proto-oncogenes, which are then expressed at higher levels, and to the MLV P50 protein that regulates transcription from the MLV promoter and cellular genes [84]. P50 can promote proliferation and growth independence while suppressing apoptosis [84]. MLV-induced leukemias might also benefit from myeloid cells’ natural ability to enter tissues, becoming malignant more rapidly because they need not acquire mutations or epigenetic changes to achieve the invasiveness that is a hallmark of cancer.

3.3.2. Marek’s disease (chicken)

Another striking example of particularly rapid onset viral cancer is Marek’s disease, an avian cancer caused by a herpesvirus: Marek’s Disease Virus (MDV) [85]. Marek's disease has a historic role in cancer prevention, as vaccines first developed in the 1970s - pioneering anti-cancer vaccines - have mostly controlled transmission and cancer in chicken flocks. MDV infection is associated with permanent immune suppression in susceptible chicken strains or in infections involving highly oncogenic virus strains. Chicks infected with MDV develop gross T-cell lymphomas in as little as 16 days post infection [80] (Table). Lymphomas can also develop in adults of susceptible strains [86].

3.3.3. MmuPV1 (mouse)

The study of papillomavirus-induced cancer was transformed with the discovery, reported in 2011, of papillomavirus MmuPV1 in the cutaneous warts of immune-deficient mice [87,88]. This virus can also infect immune-competent laboratory mice, inducing cancer in both cutaneous and mucosal squamous epithelial tissues, in the presence or absence of cofactors such as carcinogens or estrogen. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is generally diagnosed 4–6 months post infection [88].

Recently, however, MmuPV1-induced SCC was shown to arise within 2 weeks of infection - more rapidly than any previously reported epithelial cancer [89] (preprint; Table). These rapid-onset SCCs developed following infection of adult, immune-competent FVB/N mice, in tissues prone to papillomavirus-associated SCC in human patients such as the base of the tongue and the anus. Remarkably, these invasive tongue and anal cancers regressed completely, spontaneously, within 2–6 weeks. T cells, implicated in the spontaneous regression of childhood cancers and neonatal swine melanoma described above, were required for this regression. However, tumors in the skin, where this virus was originally found, only regressed partially [89] (preprint). These results indicate that tumor cell invasion can precede the ability to evade the immune system. The factors responsible for these rapid-onset cancers and their differential susceptibility to regression have not been identified.

3.3.4. EBV (human)

EBV, which is associated with 2 % of human cancers, infects and causes tumorigenesis in lymphocytes as well as epithelial cells [73,90]. In the specialized context of iatrogenic immune suppression associated with organ transplantation, cases of lymphoma have been diagnosed less than 2 months post apparent primary infection of an EBV-negative patient by tissue from an EBV-positive donor [91]. Similarly, in immune-deficient mice, EBV-infected, CD34-depleted human cord blood injected into the peritoneum yields lymphomas in as little as 4 weeks [92].

3.3.5. HPV (human)

HPVs are associated with approximately 5 % of human cancers [73]. Like MmuPV1 and other papillomaviruses, HPVs infect and cause tumors of squamous epithelium [22,23,74]. The majority of HPV-associated malignancies worldwide are cancers of the cervix, the fourth most common cancer [23]. HPV is associated with over 95 % of cervical cancers, which generally develop over decades after sexually transmitted HPV infection [73,77,78]. However, some cervical cancers develop much more rapidly, with diagnosis in women in their late teens and early twenties [93]. This apparent rapid onset is corroborated by the observation that 10–25 % of invasive cervical cancers develop within 1–5 years of a normal cytological screen, particularly in younger women [93,94]. Development of rapid-onset cervical cancers is not strongly linked to HPV genotype or to other assessed risk factors such as number of pregnancies, contraceptive use, or smoking [93]. Younger women are more likely to have rapid-onset cervical cancer as assessed by pap smear [93,94]. Rapid-onset cases far more frequently involve a glandular component compared with normal-onset cases. The multipotent progenitors that can give rise to both squamous epithelium and glandular epithelium lie in the cervical transformation zone [95]. These multipotent progenitors may have more stem-like properties [95] and may therefore require fewer genetic changes to achieve the hallmarks of cancer.

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has overtaken cervical cancer in the United States as the most common HPV-associated malignancy, with 70 % of OPSCCs testing positive for HPV [96]. Oropharyngeal cancers are often detected only after they have metastasized to local lymph nodes, and the corresponding primary cancers are often small and notoriously hard to find [[97], [98], [99]]. Robotic surgery has been used to detect initially unknown primary cancers at the base of the tongue, some as small as 2 or 3 mm [97,98]. These small cancers might reflect rapid progression from initiation to metastasis. Consistent with this possibility, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis suggests that OPSCC is often diagnosed long after onset [100] (preprint). Blood samples collected prospectively from patients up to 10 years before OPSCC diagnosis revealed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sharing the cancer's mutational signature [100]. Such early cancer development could be explained by recent computer analysis of HNSCC mutations that infers the timing of progression [101]. This modeling suggested that key drivers of HPV+ OPSCC and other head-and-neck cancers, such as HPV integration and PIK3CA amplification, occur 20–30 years before diagnosis [101]. These results suggest that development of some HPV-associated HNSCCs might involve rapid onset.

4. Conclusion

While slow-onset cancers develop over decades in people and over 4 months or more in rodents, rapid-onset cancers develop one to two orders of magnitude faster. These cancers grow quickly, invade, and can metastasize. However, a subset regress spontaneously - apparently failing to acquire robust hallmarks of cancer such as replicative immortality or evasion of the immune system. While rapid-onset cancers require some of the same factors required for slow-onset cancers, critical cellular, genetic or epigenetic factors responsible for the rapidity of their onset have yet to be determined.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Andrea Bilger: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Paul F. Lambert: Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank Magdalena Murray and Bill Sugden for insights, discussions, and comments. This project was supported by NIH grants P01 CA022443 and R35 CA210807 (PFL) and by the Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) program, through the National Cancer Institute grant P50CA278595. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of sponsoring institutions.

Contributor Information

Andrea Bilger, Email: bilger@oncology.wisc.edu.

Paul F. Lambert, Email: plambert@wisc.edu.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  • 1.Armitage P., Doll R. The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer. Dec. 2004;91(12):1983–1989. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Armitage P., Doll R. A two-stage theory of carcinogenesis in relation to the age distribution of human cancer. Br. J. Cancer. Jun. 1957;11(2):161–169. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1957.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature. Feb. 2020;578(7793):82–93. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brims F., Kumarasamy C., Menon L., Olsen N., de Klerk N., Franklin P. The western Australian mesothelioma registry: analysis of 60 years of cases. Respirol. Carlton Vic. Apr. 2024;29(4):288–294. doi: 10.1111/resp.14648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klebe S., Hocking A.J., Soeberg M., Leigh J. The significance of short latency in mesothelioma for attribution of causation: report of a case with predisposing germline mutations and review of the literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. Dec. 2021;18(24) doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marinaccio A., et al. Analysis of latency time and its determinants in asbestos related malignant mesothelioma cases of the Italian register. Eur. J. Cancer Oxf. Engl. 1990;43(18):2722–2728. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.018. Dec. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith A.H., Marshall G., Roh T., Ferreccio C., Liaw J., Steinmaus C. Lung, bladder, and kidney cancer mortality 40 Years after arsenic exposure reduction. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Mar. 2018;110(3):241–249. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Califano J., et al. Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization. Cancer Res. Jun. 1996;56(11):2488–2492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chin D., Boyle G.M., Theile D.R., Parsons P.G., Coman W.B. Molecular introduction to head and neck cancer (HNSCC) carcinogenesis. Br. J. Plast. Surg. Oct. 2004;57(7):595–602. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fearon E.R., Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. Jun. 1990;61(5):759–767. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kinzler K.W., Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. Oct. 1996;87(2):159–170. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clapp N.K. Carcinogenicity of nitrosamines and methanesulphonate esters given intraperitoneally, in RF mice. Int. J. Cancer. Nov. 1973;12(3):728–733. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910120320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldfarb S., Pugh T.D., Koen H., He Y.Z. Preneoplastic and neoplastic progression during hepatocarcinogenesis in mice injected with diethylnitrosamine in infancy. Environ. Health Perspect. Apr. 1983;50:149–161. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8350149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lu G., et al. Detection and delineation of squamous neoplasia with hyperspectral imaging in a mouse model of tongue carcinogenesis. J. Biophot. Mar. 2018;11(3) doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. Jul. 2012;487(7407):330–337. doi: 10.1038/nature11252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nakayama M., et al. Intestinal cancer progression by mutant p53 through the acquisition of invasiveness associated with complex glandular formation. Oncogene. Oct. 2017;36(42):5885–5896. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Rourke K.P., et al. Transplantation of engineered organoids enables rapid generation of metastatic mouse models of colorectal cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. Jun. 2017;35(6):577–582. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. Jan. 2000;100(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. Mar. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakayama M., Wang D., Kok S.Y., Oshima H., Oshima M. Genetic alterations and microenvironment that drive malignant progression of colorectal cancer: lessons from mouse and organoid models. J. Cancer Prev. Mar. 2022;27(1):1–6. doi: 10.15430/JCP.2022.27.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee-Six H., et al. The landscape of somatic mutation in normal colorectal epithelial cells. Nature. Oct. 2019;574(7779):532–537. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1672-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Galati L., Chiantore M.V., Marinaro M., Di Bonito P. Human oncogenic viruses: characteristics and prevention strategies-lessons learned from human papillomaviruses. Viruses. Mar. 2024;16(3):416. doi: 10.3390/v16030416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rosendo-Chalma P., Antonio-Véjar V., Ortiz Tejedor J.G., Ortiz Segarra J., Vega Crespo B., Bigoni-Ordóñez G.D. The hallmarks of cervical cancer: molecular mechanisms induced by human papillomavirus. Biology. Jan. 2024;13(2):77. doi: 10.3390/biology13020077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pearlman R., et al. Prevalence and spectrum of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol. Apr. 2017;3(4):464–471. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eccles D.M., et al. An unusually severe phenotype for familial adenomatous polyposis. Arch. Dis. Child. Nov. 1997;77(5):431–435. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.5.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moser A.R., Pitot H.C., Dove W.F. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science. Jan. 1990;247(4940):322–324. doi: 10.1126/science.2296722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Halberg R.B., et al. Long-lived Min mice develop advanced intestinal cancers through a genetically conservative pathway. Cancer Res. Jul. 2009;69(14):5768–5775. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hahn W.C., Counter C.M., Lundberg A.S., Beijersbergen R.L., Brooks M.W., Weinberg R.A. Creation of human tumour cells with defined genetic elements. Nature. Jul. 1999;400(6743):464–468. doi: 10.1038/22780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Böttinger P., et al. Cooperation of genes in HPV16 E6/E7-dependent cervicovaginal carcinogenesis trackable by endoscopy and independent of exogenous estrogens or carcinogens. Carcinogenesis. Nov. 2020;41(11):1605–1615. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brown H.K., Schiavone K., Tazzyman S., Heymann D., Chico T.J. Zebrafish xenograft models of cancer and metastasis for drug discovery. Expet Opin. Drug Discov. Apr. 2017;12(4):379–389. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2017.1297416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cho K., et al. Genetically engineered mouse models for liver cancer. Cancers. Dec. 2019;12(1):14. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kalla D., Kind A., Schnieke A. Genetically engineered pigs to study cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. Jan. 2020;21(2):488. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kaushal J.B., Takkar S., Batra S.K., Siddiqui J.A. Diverse landscape of genetically engineered mouse models: genomic and molecular insights into prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. Jul. 2024;593 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee Y.-R., et al. WWP1 gain-of-function inactivation of PTEN in cancer predisposition. N. Engl. J. Med. May 2020;382(22):2103–2116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nero C., Ciccarone F., Pietragalla A., Scambia G. PTEN and gynecological cancers. Cancers. Sep. 2019;11(10):1458. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fluck M.M., Schaffhausen B.S. Lessons in signaling and tumorigenesis from polyomavirus middle T antigen. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR. Sep. 2009;73(3):542–563. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00009-09. Table of Contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Attalla S., Taifour T., Bui T., Muller W. Insights from transgenic mouse models of PyMT-induced breast cancer: recapitulating human breast cancer progression in vivo. Oncogene. Jan. 2021;40(3):475–491. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01560-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guy C.T., Cardiff R.D., Muller W.J. Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease. Mol. Cell Biol. Mar. 1992;12(3):954–961. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.954-961.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cass D.L. Fetal abdominal tumors and cysts. Transl. Pediatr. May 2021;10(5):1530–1541. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Giannikopoulos P., Parham D.M. Rhabdomyosarcoma: how advanced molecular methods are shaping the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. Off. J. Soc. Pediatr. Pathol. Paediatr. Pathol. Soc. 2021;24(5):395–404. doi: 10.1177/10935266211013621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Marshall G.M., et al. The prenatal origins of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. Apr. 2014;14(4):277–289. doi: 10.1038/nrc3679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gröbner S.N., et al. The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers. Nature. Mar. 2018;555(7696):321–327. doi: 10.1038/nature25480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ma X., et al. Pan-cancer genome and transcriptome analyses of 1,699 paediatric leukaemias and solid tumours. Nature. Mar. 2018;555(7696):371–376. doi: 10.1038/nature25795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Murphree A.L., Benedict W.F. Retinoblastoma: clues to human oncogenesis. Science. Mar. 1984;223(4640):1028–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.6320372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xu X.L., et al. Retinoblastoma has properties of a cone precursor tumor and depends upon cone-specific MDM2 signaling. Cell. Jun. 2009;137(6):1018–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu X.L., et al. Rb suppresses human cone-precursor-derived retinoblastoma tumours. Nature. Oct. 2014;514(7522):385–388. doi: 10.1038/nature13813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nag A., Khetan V. Retinoblastoma - a comprehensive review, update and recent advances. Indian J. Ophthalmol. Jun. 2024;72(6):778–788. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2414_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Saiju R., Duwal S. Bilateral retinoblastoma in early infancy. Nepal. J. Ophthalmol. Biannu. Peer-Rev. Acad. J. Nepal Ophthalmic Soc. NEPJOPH. 2013;5(1):124–128. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v5i1.7840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Athavale V., Khetan V. Knudson to embryo selection: a story of the genetics of retinoblastoma. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2018;8(4):196–204. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_37_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Aygun N. Biological and genetic features of neuroblastoma and their clinical importance. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2018;14(2):73–90. doi: 10.2174/1573396314666180129101627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tsubota S., Kadomatsu K. Origin and initiation mechanisms of neuroblastoma. Cell Tissue Res. May 2018;372(2):211–221. doi: 10.1007/s00441-018-2796-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ward E., DeSantis C., Robbins A., Kohler B., Jemal A. Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2014;64(2):83–103. doi: 10.3322/caac.21219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coldman A.J., Fryer C.J., Elwood J.M., Sonley M.J. Neuroblastoma: influence of age at diagnosis, stage, tumor site, and sex on prognosis. Cancer. Oct. 1980;46(8):1896–1901. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19801015)46:8&#x0003c;1896::aid-cncr2820460833&#x0003e;3.0.co. 2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peifer M., et al. Telomerase activation by genomic rearrangements in high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature. Oct. 2015;526(7575):700–704. doi: 10.1038/nature14980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Valentijn L.J., et al. TERT rearrangements are frequent in neuroblastoma and identify aggressive tumors. Nat. Genet. Dec. 2015;47(12):1411–1414. doi: 10.1038/ng.3438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Molenaar J.J., et al. LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression. Nat. Genet. Nov. 2012;44(11):1199–1206. doi: 10.1038/ng.2436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pugh T.J., et al. The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nat. Genet. Mar. 2013;45(3):279–284. doi: 10.1038/ng.2529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hofman D.A., et al. Translation of non-canonical open reading frames as a cancer cell survival mechanism in childhood medulloblastoma. Mol. Cell. Jan. 2024;84(2):261–276.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ferrari A., et al. Soft tissue sarcoma across the age spectrum: a population-based study from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. Dec. 2011;57(6):943–949. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Onderoğlu L.S., Yücel A., Yüce K. Prenatal sonographic features of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Mar. 1999;13(3):210–212. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13030210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hart P.S., et al. Prenatal detection of non-cardiac rhabdomyosarcoma. Prenat. Diagn. Mar. 1990;10(3):169–173. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970100306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shern J.F., et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a landscape of alterations affecting a common genetic axis in fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors. Cancer Discov. Feb. 2014;4(2):216–231. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vicha A., et al. Changes on chromosome 11p15.5 as specific marker for embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma? Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Dec. 2023;62(12):732–739. doi: 10.1002/gcc.23194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Linardic C.M. PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Lett. Oct. 2008;270(1):10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pampena R., et al. Melanoma in children: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. JEADV. Sep. 2023;37(9):1758–1776. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Perkins I.U., et al. Melanoma in infants, caused by a gene fusion involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. Jan. 2024;37(1):6–14. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.13115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Horak V., Palanova A., Cizkova J., Miltrova V., Vodicka P., Kupcova Skalnikova H. Melanoma-bearing libechov minipig (MeLiM): the unique swine model of hereditary metastatic melanoma. Genes. Nov. 2019;10(11):915. doi: 10.3390/genes10110915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Scard C., Aubert H., Wargny M., Martin L., Barbarot S. Risk of melanoma in congenital melanocytic nevi of all sizes: a systematic review. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. JEADV. Jan. 2023;37(1):32–39. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Planska D., Horak V. Spontaneous regression of swine melanoma: the role of tumour-infiltrating T and NK cells. Anticancer Res. Feb. 2023;43(2):631–638. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Maio M. Melanoma as a model tumour for immuno-oncology. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. Sep. 2012;23(Suppl 8) doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds257. viii10-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Choi U.Y., Lee S.H. Understanding metabolic pathway rewiring by oncogenic gamma herpesvirus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Aug. 2024;34(11):1–10. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2407.07039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dorothea M., Xie J., Yiu S.P.T., Chiang A.K.S. Contribution of epstein-barr virus lytic proteins to cancer hallmarks and implications from other oncoviruses. Cancers. Apr. 2023;15(7):2120. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.MacLennan S.A., Marra M.A. Oncogenic viruses and the epigenome: how viruses hijack epigenetic mechanisms to drive cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. May 2023;24(11):9543. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mallick S., Choi Y., Taylor A.M., Cosper P.F. Human papillomavirus-induced chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in squamous cell cancers. Viruses. Mar. 2024;16(4):501. doi: 10.3390/v16040501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Padarath K., Deroubaix A., Kramvis A. The complex role of HBeAg and its precursors in the pathway to hepatocellular carcinoma. Viruses. Mar. 2023;15(4):857. doi: 10.3390/v15040857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bhattacharjee R., et al. Mechanistic role of HPV-associated early proteins in cervical cancer: molecular pathways and targeted therapeutic strategies. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. Jun. 2022;174 doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Burger E.A., Kim J.J., Sy S., Castle P.E. Age of acquiring causal human papillomavirus (HPV) infections: leveraging simulation models to explore the natural history of HPV-induced cervical cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. Sep. 2017;65(6):893–899. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Viens L.J., et al. Human papillomavirus-associated cancers - United States, 2008-2012. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. Jul. 2016;65(26):661–666. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6526a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Atkin S.J.L., Griffin B.E., Dilworth S.M. Polyoma virus and simian virus 40 as cancer models: history and perspectives. Semin. Cancer Biol. Aug. 2009;19(4):211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Calnek B.W. Marek's disease--a model for herpesvirus oncology. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1986;12(4):293–320. doi: 10.3109/10408418509104432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jenkins V.K., Upton A.C. CELL-FREE transmission of radiogenic myeloid leukemia in the mouse. Cancer Res. Dec. 1963;23:1748–1755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Risser R., Horowitz J.M., McCubrey J. Endogenous mouse leukemia viruses. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1983;17:85–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tanaka T., Craig A.W. Cell-free transmission of murine myeloid leukaemia. Eur. J. Cancer. Aug. 1970;6(4):329–333. doi: 10.1016/0014-2964(70)90098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Akkawi C., et al. Murine leukemia virus (MLV) P50 protein induces cell transformation via transcriptional regulatory function. Retrovirology. Sep. 2023;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12977-023-00631-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhu Z.-J., et al. Immune escape of avian oncogenic Marek's disease herpesvirus and antagonistic host immune responses. NPJ Vaccines. Jun. 2024;9(1):109. doi: 10.1038/s41541-024-00905-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Calnek B.W. Influence of age at exposure on the pathogenesis of Marek's disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Sep. 1973;51(3):929–939. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.3.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ingle A., Ghim S., Joh J., Chepkoech I., Bennett Jenson A., Sundberg J.P. Novel laboratory mouse papillomavirus (MusPV) infection. Vet. Pathol. Mar. 2011;48(2):500–505. doi: 10.1177/0300985810377186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Spurgeon M.E., Lambert P.F. Mus musculus papillomavirus 1: a new frontier in animal models of papillomavirus pathogenesis. J. Virol. Apr. 2020;94(9) doi: 10.1128/JVI.00002-20. 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bilger A., et al. Invasive cancer and spontaneous regression two weeks after papillomavirus infection. BioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. Sep. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.09.04.611275. p. 2024.09.04.611275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yu H., Robertson E.S. Epstein-barr virus history and pathogenesis. Viruses. Mar. 2023;15(3):714. doi: 10.3390/v15030714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ho M., et al. Epstein-Barr virus infections and DNA hybridization studies in posttransplantation lymphoma and lymphoproliferative lesions: the role of primary infection. J. Infect. Dis. Nov. 1985;152(5):876–886. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.5.876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bilger A., et al. Leflunomide/teriflunomide inhibit Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)- induced lymphoproliferative disease and lytic viral replication. Oncotarget. Jul. 2017;8(27):44266–44280. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hildesheim A., et al. Risk factors for rapid-onset cervical cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Mar. 1999;180(3 Pt 1):571–577. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70256-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Janerich D.T., et al. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am. J. Publ. Health. Jun. 1995;85(6):791–794. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.6.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Regauer S., Reich O. The origin of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) - induced cervical squamous cancer. Curr. Opin. Virol. Dec. 2021;51:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.CDC, “Cancers Linked With HPV Each Year,” Cancer. Accessed: November. 8, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/cases.html.
  • 97.Channir H.I., et al. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135(10):1051–1057. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1052983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mehta V., et al. A new paradigm for the diagnosis and management of unknown primary tumors of the head and neck: a role for transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope. Jan. 2013;123(1):146–151. doi: 10.1002/lary.23562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Seo S., Rooper L., Seiwert T.Y., Fakhry C. Spontaneous regression of an human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. Jan. 2023;45(1):E1–E4. doi: 10.1002/hed.27226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Das D., et al. Blood-based screening for HPV-associated cancers. MedRxiv Prepr. Serv. Health Sci. Feb. 2024:2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.04.24300841. 01.04.24300841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Leshchiner I., et al. Inferring early genetic progression in cancers with unobtainable premalignant disease. Nat. Can. (Ott.) Apr. 2023;4(4):550–563. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00533-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Xue H., et al. Malignant solid tumors in neonates: a 40-year review. J. Pediatr. Surg. Apr. 1995;30(4):543–545. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90126-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.London W.B., et al. Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children's Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Sep. 2005;23(27):6459–6465. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Glass M.C., Smith J.M., Cheng H.H., Delany M.E. Marek's disease virus telomeric integration profiles of neoplastic host tissues reveal unbiased chromosomal selection and loss of cellular diversity during tumorigenesis. Genes. Oct. 2021;12(10):1630. doi: 10.3390/genes12101630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.


Articles from Tumour Virus Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES