Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Jan 28;15:3465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87308-w

A fractal–fractional order modeling approach to understanding stem cell-chemotherapy combinations for cancer

Esam Y Salah 1,2, Bhausaheb Sontakke 1, Ahmed A Hamoud 3, Homan Emadifar 4,5,6,, Atul Kumar 7
PMCID: PMC11772579  PMID: 39870737

Abstract

The main objective of this work is to study the mathematical model that combines stem cell therapy and chemotherapy for cancer cells. We study the model using the fractal fractional derivative with the Mittag-Leffler kernel. In the analytical part, we study the existence of the solution and its uniqueness, which was studied based on the fixed point theory. The equilibrium points were also studied and discussed after stem cell therapy, and the approximate solutions for the given model were obtained using the Adam Bashford method, which depends on interpolation with Lagrange polynomials. Finally, the model was simulated using the Mathematica software, and through the figures, we found that the components of the model approach the equilibrium point, which indicates the stability of the model at the equilibrium point. Also, the result of the numerical simulation and graphic for the concentration of cells over time indicate the effects of the therapies on the decay rate of tumor cells and the growth rate of effector cells to modify the cancer patient’s immune system. It is worth noting that we simulated all the model components with different fractional orders, confirming the effect of stem cell therapy and chemotherapy on the cells and the decay of cancer cells.

Keywords: Mathematical model, Fractional derivative, Matignon criterion, Adams-Bashforth method

Subject terms: Cancer, Mathematics and computing

Introduction

Despite remarkable advancements in science and technology, cancer continues to pose a formidable challenge to human health. While conventional treatment approaches like surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and gene therapy have made progress, the core methods for tackling cancer have not transformed significantly. However, mathematical modeling offers a powerful tool to gain valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of cancer progression, immune responses, and potential therapeutic interventions1,2. In3,4, researchers have increasingly explored mathematical frameworks to enhance our understanding of cancer biology and develop more effective treatment strategies. Several studies have employed models to investigate the interactions between T-cells, particularly effector T-cells, and tumor cells, elucidating how these interactions influence cancer development; these quantitative models provide a comprehensive perspective that complements experimental research on the complex immune dynamics as in58.

The authors in9,10 clarified that stem cells have revolutionized the treatment of numerous diseases due to their remarkable ability to differentiate and proliferate. The researchers confirmed in11,12 that studying stem cells mathematically has excellent importance for considering their therapeutic potential; mathematical modeling of stem cell growth dynamics can help medical scientists determine optimal screening and treatment protocols since stem cell therapies are costly. Quantitative analyses of stem cell behavior through modeling provide the key insights that complement experimental stem cell research, highlighting promising directions for medical applications of stem cells. Fractional calculus and its various applications have recently witnessed remarkable developments as many fractional differential operators have emerged, such as Riemann-Liouville,Caputo,Grunwald-Letnikov, Atangana-Baleanu, Conformable Fractional, and Opsi Hilfer. For more information about these operators, see1315. Furthermore, numerical and analytical methods have been formulated to meet the challenges of fractional calculus1619. The power of fractional or non-classical calculus has been effectively harnessed across a wide range of disciplines, including computer science, physics, biology, social sciences, economics, engineering, epidemiology, and beyond2026. A key advantage of employing fractional calculus with its various differential and integral operators lies in the ability to utilize fractional operators of arbitrary order, a flexibility not afforded by conventional derivatives of integer order. In recent years, there has been increased interest in mathematically modeling infectious diseases using fractional-order systems of equations. Fractional-order models are more accurate than integer-order models in representing memory effects over time and nonlocal phenomena in space. Overall, fractional calculus allows more precise modeling of infectious disease dynamics. A key benefit of fractional-order models is reducing errors from omitting parameters in natural processes see,2733. In34, the authors apply time-fractional derivatives to model tumor growth dynamics involving cancer stem cells, generalizing an integer-order model previously analyzed. The aim is to investigate the sensitivity of the cancer growth paradox to differing mortality rates of non-stem cancer cells. It demonstrates that the paradox occurs across various parameter values in the proposed fractional-order model. A mathematical model of stem cells and chemotherapy for cancer treatment using fractional-order differential equations with the Caputo sense is used to represent the model by Özköse et al.35.

In34, the authors apply time-fractional derivatives to model tumor growth dynamics involving cancer stem cells, generalizing an integer-order model previously analyzed. The aim is to investigate the sensitivity of the cancer growth paradox to differing mortality rates of non-stem cancer cells. It demonstrates that the paradox occurs across various parameter values in the proposed fractional-order model. A mathematical model of stem cells and chemotherapy for cancer treatment using fractional-order differential equations with the Caputo sense is used to represent the model by Özköse et al.35.

In 2017, Atangana36 introduced a new class of operators called fractal–fractional operators (FFOs), combining concepts from fractional and fractal calculus. A recently developed fractal–fractional operator holds promise for addressing such mathematical challenges37,38. Furthermore, the fractal–fractional formulation allows us to account for biological systems’ inherent complexities and memory effects, potentially leading to more accurate and realistic predictions. Over the past few years, a growing number of researchers have applied this fractal–fractional operator to model various real-world scenarios, demonstrating its potential for capturing complex system behaviors, see3946. Farman et al.47 proposed a fractional order model to study the sustainable approach for cancer treatment with chemotherapy by utilizing a fractional operator. The model incorporated the fractal–fractional Mittag-Leffler operator with non-integer order derivatives to capture the complex dynamics and memory effects of cancer progression and treatment response. We developed a mathematical model of stem cells and chemotherapy for cancer treatment using a mathematical fractal–fractional model via the generalized Mittag-Leffler-type kernel. The model provides insights into how stem cells support effector cells that combat tumor cells, thereby boosting the immune system of cancer patients. At the same time, the model incorporates chemotherapy, killing infected cancer cells. By modeling the dynamics of stem cells, immune cells, and chemotherapy, it is possible to understand their complex interactions during cancer treatment. The quantitative framework enables predicting how stem cell therapies and chemotherapy could be optimized to improve outcomes for cancer patients. Overall, the mathematical modeling approach furthers comprehension of combination therapies involving immune system modulation through stem cells and direct tumor cell cytotoxicity from chemotherapy. Overall, this work highlights the potential of mathematical modeling in guiding the development of innovative and effective cancer treatment approaches, paving the way for future experimental studies and clinical applications.

This research paper consists of seven sections. The second section presents a set of fundamental definitions, while the third section discusses the mathematical model. The fourth section addresses the existence and unit of a solution to the mathematical model. The fifth section examines stability and then calculates the approximate solution in the sixth section. The seventh section is dedicated to discussing the results.

Preliminaries

Here are some fundamental ideas that will be used in this study:

Definition 1

48 Let Inline graphic be continuous in (ab) , if Inline graphic is fractal differentiable on (ab) with order Inline graphic then, the fractal–fractional derivative of Inline graphic of order Inline graphic in the Riemann-Liouville sense using the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel is given as

graphic file with name M6.gif 1

where Inline graphic,  and  Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

Definition 2

36 If Inline graphic is continuous in an opened interval (ab) , then the fractal–fractional integral of Inline graphic with order Inline graphic is defined as:

graphic file with name M14.gif

The formulation of the model

Before starting our study, we will take this model that the authors presented in1, which includes three distinct patterns of cell division. Specifically,they assume that stem cells (denoted S) can either:

  1. Undergo symmetric self-renewing divisions with probability Inline graphic, generating two new stem cell daughters.

  2. Divide asymmetrically with probability Inline graphic, resulting in one stem cell and one differentiated progeny that lacks stemness.

  3. Or differentiate symmetrically into two non-stem daughters with probability Inline graphic. We constrain the relative probabilities such that Inline graphic Furthermore, we define the rates of stem cell division and cell death as k and Inline graphic, respectively. Given that the stem cell pool can be replenished via both asymmetric and symmetric differentiating divisions, we derive an equation to capture the time evolution of stem cell numbers. This theoretical framework allows us to make quantitative predictions about how different division modalities influence net stem cell expansion or depletion. By fitting our model to experimental data, we can potentially infer the probabilities governing cell fate choices in vivo.

Initially, Alqudah et al.1, developed a mathematical model to explore the potential of stem cell therapy in treating cancer. The model considers the interactions between three cell populations over time:

  1. E(t) effector immune cells,

  2. T(t) tumor cells,

  3. S(t) therapeutic stem cells.

To capture the downstream impact of stem cell activity, they introduced an amplification factor A. Using these elements, we derived a simplified system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) describing how effector cells, tumour cells, and amplified stem cell signals modulate one another. We can predict the efficacy of stem-cell-based approaches by analyzing this theoretical model under different conditions. Fitting this model to preclinical/clinical data could help refine the quantitative assumptions regarding stem cell amplification effects and immune system activation. Overall, this general modelling framework provides a means to theoretically investigate anti-cancer stem cell therapies before experimental testing.

graphic file with name M20.gif 2

In building upon the model presented in equation (2), they propose an extension incorporating combination therapy with both chemotherapy and stem cell treatment for cancer as:

graphic file with name M21.gif 3

where Inline graphic,

subject to Inline graphic and Inline graphic, where U(t) is chemotherapy concentration drug. In our current work, we present the model (3) on a mathematical fractal–fractional model via the generalized Mittag-Leffler-type kernel because this operator gives accurate results for describing models and phenomena that describe real-world biological systems, such as memory effects, long-range interactions, and anomalous dynamics. So, the model (3) become as

graphic file with name M25.gif 4

The first equation in model (4) captures the interplay between the stem cell population (S) and chemotherapy drug concentration (U) over time Inline graphic. Furthermore, the model incorporates a decline in viable stem cells directly induced by the chemotherapeutic agent, occurring at rate Inline graphic.

The second equation represents the dynamics of effector cells. These cells have a constant source rate Inline graphic, which is the sum of a natural source rate Inline graphic and a rate Inline graphic derived from the transformation of stem cells. The equation accounts for the death rate of effector cellsInline graphic, their proliferation stimulated by stem cells, and their interaction with tumour cells and chemotherapy drugs at rates Inline graphic respectively.

The third equation shows the rate of cancer cell production minus the amount of decrease in it as a result of the interaction between the responding cells and the chemical drug with rates Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively. The last equation represents the rate of change in the concentration of the chemical drug.

Existence and uniqueness of solution

Establishing the existence and uniqueness of solutions plays a crucial role in validating the outcomes of a study. It ensures the robustness and stability of the analyses performed and facilitates meaningful comparisons with other research endeavours. Furthermore, these results provide a solid theoretical foundation, guiding the applicability and broader generalization of the findings. Consequently, emphasizing the importance of existence and uniqueness within the study context helps reinforce the reliability and significance of the research conclusions drawn. In this section, we prove the existence of a solution for model (4) by using fixed point theory. Let Inline graphic be a non empty set in Banach space, s.t Inline graphic where Inline graphic with norm Inline graphic. For Inline graphic.

Now, we rewrite the R.H.S of model (4) as following

graphic file with name M51.gif 5

By Using definition 1

graphic file with name M52.gif 6
graphic file with name M53.gif 7
graphic file with name M54.gif 8
graphic file with name M55.gif 9

Then

graphic file with name M56.gif 10

become

graphic file with name M57.gif 11

So the fractal–fractional Atangana-Baleanu of (4) in the Riemann-Liouville sense is become as:

graphic file with name M58.gif 12

also, we can rewrite (12) in form of initial value problem as the following

graphic file with name M59.gif 13

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic

and

graphic file with name M62.gif 14

By definition 1 and equation (13) we get

graphic file with name M63.gif 15

By taking the fractal-fractionl Atangana- Baleanu integral on (15) we obtain

graphic file with name M64.gif 16

Now we extend the (16) as

graphic file with name M65.gif 17

We defined the oprator Inline graphic to derive a fixed-point problem as

graphic file with name M67.gif 18

Theorem 1

49 Let E be a Banach space, Inline graphic a convex closed bounded set, Inline graphic an open set, and Inline graphic. Then for the continuous and compact map Inline graphic either:

  1. Inline graphic s.t. Inline graphic or

  2. Inline graphic and Inline graphic s.t. Inline graphic

Theorem 2

Let Inline graphic. Assume:

(Inline graphic)

Inline graphic and Inline graphic s.t. Inline graphic and Inline graphic, Inline graphic .

(Inline graphic)
graphic file with name M85.gif 19

with Inline graphic.

Then the solution of (4), and then for (13) exists on J.

Proof

Let Inline graphic and assume Inline graphic. Evidently, as K is continuous, so too is F. From (A1) we obtain

graphic file with name M89.gif

for Inline graphic. Then

graphic file with name M91.gif 20

Thus F is uniformly bounded on Inline graphic. Now, take Inline graphic s.t. Inline graphic and Inline graphic. and let Inline graphic, we find

graphic file with name M97.gif

Now when Inline graphic, we see that the expression

Inline graphic when Inline graphic. This gives the equicontinuity of F and, accordingly, the compactness of F on Inline graphic by the Arzela-Ascoli thoerem. Since all conditions of Theorem 1 are fulfilled on F, we have one of (1) or (2). From (Inline graphic), we set Inline graphic for some Inline graphic s.t.

graphic file with name M105.gif

Form (A1) and (20), we get

graphic file with name M106.gif 21

Assume that there are Inline graphic and Inline graphic such that. Inline graphic. Then, by the above inequality, we obtain

graphic file with name M110.gif

this contradiction with our hypthesis (A2), then F has a fixed point in P by Theorem 1. This demonstrates a solution to the model (4) exists. Inline graphic

Now, we prove the uniqueness of the solution of the model (4).

Lemma 1

Let Inline graphic and let Inline graphic, where Inline graphic.

Then the kernels Inline graphic and Inline graphic defined in (5) are satisfies the Lipschitz condition.

Proof

For Inline graphic, we take Inline graphic, and we get

graphic file with name M119.gif

we obtain

graphic file with name M120.gif

Then Inline graphic satisfy the Lipschitze condition w.r.t. S. Similarly we can prove that Inline graphic satisfy the Lipschitz condition w.r.t. U as the following:

graphic file with name M123.gif

we get

graphic file with name M124.gif

Now, we can prove that Inline graphic satisfy the Lipschitz condition w.r.t. E as the following:

graphic file with name M126.gif

we obtain

graphic file with name M127.gif

Finally, we can prove that Inline graphic satisfy the Lipschitz condition w.r.t. A as the following:

graphic file with name M129.gif

we obtain

graphic file with name M130.gif

Consequently, Inline graphic and Inline graphic are satisfying the Lipschitz condition. Inline graphic

Theorem 3

Assume that lemma 1be hold. Then the model (4) has exactly one solution if

graphic file with name M134.gif 22

Proof

Suppose that there is an other solution for the model (4), namely Inline graphic with the initial condition Inline graphic.

So by using the model (17)

graphic file with name M137.gif

Now, we calculate

graphic file with name M138.gif

We can say the above inequality holds if Inline graphic or Inline graphic by the same way we can prove that Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

Then Inline graphic. Then the model (4) has a unique solution. Inline graphic

Equilibrium point

Stability theories play a significant role in understanding the long-term dynamics of our model. They provide a theoretical framework that predicts whether a system will converge to a steady state, oscillate, or diverge under small perturbations. We perform numerical simulations using the Adams-Bashforth method to validate these theoretical predictions, as detailed in Section 6. These simulations not only confirm the stability or instability of the equilibrium points but also provide insight into the behavior of the system under initial conditions. In this segment, we initiate our inquiries by conducting a local stability analysis within the framework of fractional-order derivatives. The conventional approach employed for examining local stability using the Jacobian matrix differs from that of the fractional context. The Matignon criterion50 is utilized in fractional scenarios. The equilibrium point Inline graphic for the fractional differential equation Inline graphic is considered locally stable only when the following condition is met50 :

graphic file with name M148.gif 23

The approach for local stability analysis in the fractional context is detailed in51. This method involves several steps, starting with calculating the Jacobian matrix using integer-order derivatives. Subsequently, the characteristic polynomial is determined through the standard process, and the eigenvalues are computed using algebraic methods. The final step involves testing all eigenvalues against the Matignon criterion (23), incorporating the fractional order. Initially, equilibrium points for the fractional (4) are derived by solving the equations.

graphic file with name M149.gif 24

Following the calculations, the obtained equilibrium points are as follows:

Inline graphic,

Inline graphic,

Inline graphic

where

Inline graphic

Now, we calculate the Jacobian matrix of the model (4) as the following :

graphic file with name M154.gif 25

To simplify, we directly utilize the values of the parameters as outlined in Table 1. So Inline graphic become Inline graphic, the Jacobian matrix at the point Inline graphic is given by

graphic file with name M158.gif 26

After performing the calculations, the characteristic polynomial of the Jacobian matrix is expressed in the following form:

graphic file with name M159.gif 27

The eigenvalues of the Inline graphic are given by Inline graphic We note that

graphic file with name M162.gif

This fulfills the Matignon criterion,then the equilibrium point Inline graphic is locally stable.

Table 1.

Parameters description and values.

Parameter Description Value/ Unit.day
Inline graphic Stem cell therapy attrition rate − 0.028251
Inline graphic Effector cell turnover rate 0.171
Inline graphic Attrition rate due to natural death of effecror cells 0.031
Inline graphic Ability to destroy cancer cells Inline graphic1
Inline graphic Attrition rate of stem cells by Chemotherapy 11
r Tumor growth rate 0.181
Inline graphic Maximum effect of effector cells 0.12451
Inline graphic Attrition rate due to cancer and Chemotherapy of effector cells 11
Inline graphic FDeath rate due to Chemotherapy of cancer cells 0.91
Inline graphic Attrition rate of cancer cells due to effector cells 0.91
Inline graphic Decomposition rate of chemotherapy 6.41
V The rate of the Chemotherapy entering the system at a specific schedule 11

Inline graphic, the Jacobian matrix at the point Inline graphic is given by

graphic file with name M166.gif 28

After performing the calculations, the characteristic polynomial of the Jacobian matrix is expressed in the following form:

graphic file with name M167.gif 29

The eigenvalues of the Inline graphic are given by Inline graphic We note that

graphic file with name M170.gif

This fulfills the Matignon criterion,then the equilibrium point Inline graphic is locally stable.

Inline graphic, the Jacobian matrix at the point Inline graphic is given by

graphic file with name M174.gif 30

After performing the calculations, the characteristic polynomial of the Jacobian matrix is expressed in the following form:

graphic file with name M175.gif 31

The eigenvalues of the Inline graphic are given by Inline graphic We note that

graphic file with name M178.gif

but

graphic file with name M179.gif

This not fulfills the Matignon criterion,then the equilibrium point Inline graphic is unstable.

Numerical treatment

In this part, we develop a numerical approach for the fractal–fractional model (4). We use the fractional Adams-Bashforth approach based on two-step Lagrange interpolation polynomials to do this. This method offers a potent combination of accuracy, efficiency, and user-friendliness. Notably, it exhibits rapid convergence to the precise solution, even when employing a substantial discretization step (h), thereby streamlining the overall30,52. We redefine fractal fractional integral equations (17) at Inline graphic. In reality, these integrals (17) for Inline graphic are discretized as follows:

graphic file with name M183.gif 32

The formulation of the approximation of the integrals mentioned above is as follows:

graphic file with name M184.gif

After that we use two-step Lagrange interpolation polynomial to approximate Inline graphic on the interval Inline graphic with step size Inline graphic as the following:

graphic file with name M188.gif 33
graphic file with name M189.gif 34
graphic file with name M190.gif 35
graphic file with name M191.gif 36

where

Inline graphic,

Inline graphic.

Discussion and numerical findings

Here, the actual data for initial values Inline graphic, Inline graphic Inline graphic and the parameters in the table is utilized. Table 1 assumed by1 to simulate and describe the dynamic behaviors of the fractals model (4).

The study investigates the dynamic behavior of the approximate solution of the model (4) under the influence of various fractional orders, specifically Inline graphic, through applying the Adams-Bashforth method. When we implemented the algorithms in Mathematica, we got the solution almost as shown in the figures above where: In Fig. 1, we notice that the stem cells decrease and return to the initial value very quickly in the first moments. They decrease until they reach equilibrium, indicating the stem cells’ depletion by chemotherapy. In contrast, in Fig. 2, we notice that the immune cells responding to the treatment decrease in the first days, and then these cells begin to increase until they reach the value 0.9, representing the equilibrium point for this component. In addition, Fig. 3 shows the behavior of cancer cells, as we notice a rapid decrease in cancer cells until they disappear, which is a positive indicator of the response to therapy by chemotherapy and stem cells. In Fig. 4, we notice at the beginning the fluctuation of the concentration of chemotherapy so that it increases very quickly inside the cancer cells, leading to stability. Furthermore, in Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4, we notice that higher values of Inline graphic influence how quickly the system approaches equilibrium, representing a more realistic memory.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

This figure shows the approximate solution of function S(t) under the influence of different values of the fractional orders Inline graphic.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

This figure shows the approximate solution of function E(t) under the influence of different values of the fractional orders Inline graphic.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

This figure shows the approximate solution of function T(t) under the influence of different values of the fractional orders Inline graphic.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

This figure shows the approximate solution of function U(t) under the influence of different values of the fractional orders Inline graphic.

The Fig. 1 highlights the pivotal role of stem cells in fortifying the immune system against cancer by facilitating the regeneration of healthy tissues. Additionally, the effectiveness of chemotherapy in directly targeting and eradicating cancer is visually evident in Figs. 3 and 4. It is noteworthy that chemotherapy, while instrumental in cancer eradication, initially exerts a suppressive effect on the immune system. However, immune cell counts gradually rebound, as depicted in Fig. 2. The model emphasizes the importance of achieving a delicate balance between stem cell-based therapies and chemotherapy to combat cancer while concurrently supporting immune functionality effectively. These simulations confirm the stabilization or stabilization of equilibrium points and provide insight into the system’s behavior under initial conditions.

The visual representations reveal how the stem cells aid in replenishing the effector cell population, enabling a sustained immune response against the tumour cells. Concurrently, the chemotherapy agent exerts cytotoxic effects on the tumour cells, potentially reducing their population. However, as mentioned earlier, chemotherapy can initially suppress the immune system, leading to a temporary decrease in effector cell numbers.

The study’s findings underscore the importance of carefully balancing the stem cell-based immunotherapy and chemotherapy components to maximize their synergistic effects. By leveraging stem cells’ regenerative capabilities and chemotherapy’s direct tumor-killing properties, the model suggests an optimized treatment strategy can be developed, potentially leading to improved cancer management and patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Mathematical modelling is vital in understanding, anticipating, and mitigating the devastating societal impacts of infectious diseases throughout history. Fractional-order derivatives have emerged as a more prevalent and insightful framework for capturing the intricate dynamics of real-world phenomena compared to classical integer-order models. We have presented an integer-order and fractional-order mathematical model describing the interactions between stem cells, immune effector cells, tumour cells, and chemotherapy over time. The theoretical model provides insights into how the introduction of stem cells could potentially boost anti-cancer immune responses while chemotherapy acts to kill tumour cells directly. By fitting the model to experimental data in future work, the contributions of stem cell effects on immune activation could be parsed out from the direct tumoricidal impacts of chemotherapy. Additionally, the fractional-order model enables more precise dynamics capturing than traditional integer-order modelling. Our stability analysis of the fractional system revealed that the equilibrium points are locally stable under the Matignon criterion. To facilitate numerical simulations and explore the model’s dynamics, we employed the Adams-Bashforth method, which is based on two-step Lagrange polynomials to approximate the solutions of the system. The numerical simulation was done using Mathematica. Overall, the quantitative modelling approach presented here furthers understanding of the complex interplay between combination stem cell and chemotherapy treatments, highlighting promising new therapeutic avenues for combating cancer. In the future, continued theoretical developments combined with experimental validation will aid the development of potent immuno-oncology therapies harnessing the power of stem cells. A key avenue for future research involves investigating the controllability of the cancer model, specifically by incorporating the effects of chemotherapy treatment. This would enable the design and analysis of feedback control strategies, where the therapeutic input (chemotherapy dosing) is dynamically adjusted based on the observed response of the system. Also, in the future, it would be interesting to determine whether manipulating external signals can modulate Inline graphic and Inline graphic, thereby providing a means to control stem cell self-renewal versus differentiation programmatically. Inline graphic. The research results emphasize the critical need to carefully balance stem cell-based immunotherapy and chemotherapy components to optimize their combined effects. The study demonstrates that by harnessing the regenerative abilities of stem cells in conjunction with the tumor-targeting efficacy of chemotherapy, an optimized treatment strategy can be achieved, potentially improving cancer management and patient outcomes.

Author contributions

E.S. and B.S.:Conceptualized the study, developed the mathematical model, and contributed to the theoretical analysis. A.H.: Performed numerical simulations and stability analysis. H.E. and A.K.: Interpreted the results and provided guidance for model validation.

Funding

No funding.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Alqudah, M. A. Cancer treatment by stem cells and chemotherapy as a mathematical model with numerical simulations. Alex. Eng. J.59(4), 1953–1957 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kirschner, D. & Panetta, J. C. Modeling immunotherapy of the tumor-immune interaction. J. Math. Biol.37, 235–252 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Makhlouf, A. M. et al. Mathematical modelling for the role of CD4 + T cells in tumor-immune interactions. Comput. Math. Methods Med.2020 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Umar, M., Sabir, Z., Amin, F., Guirao, J. L. & Raja, M. A. Z. Stochastic numerical technique for solving HIV infection model of CD4 + T cells. Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, 1–19 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ndenda, J., Njagarah, J. & Shaw, S. Role of immunotherapy in tumor-immune interaction: Perspectives from fractional-order modelling and sensitivity analysis. Chaos Solitons Fractals148, 111036 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Robertson-Tessi, M., El-Kareh, A. & Goriely, A. A mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions. J. Theor. Biol.294, 56–73 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang, L. et al. Fractal-fractional anthroponotic cutaneous leishmania model study in sense of Caputo derivative. Alex. Eng. J.61(6), 4423–4433 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yu, J.-L. & Jang, S.R.-J. A mathematical model of tumor-immune interactions with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Appl. Math. Comput.362, 124523 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ma, X., Luan, Z. & Li, J. Inorganic nanoparticles-based systems in biomedical applications of stem cells: Opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Nanomed. 143–182 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Ossanna, R. et al. Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cells (muse cells): An easily accessible, pluripotent stem cell niche with unique and powerful properties for multiple regenerative medicine applications. Biomedicines11(6), 1587 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pedersen, R. K. et al. Hsc niche dynamics in regeneration, pre-malignancy, and cancer: Insights from mathematical modeling. Stem Cells41(3), 260–270 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uçar, E., Özdemir, N. & Altun, E. Qualitative analysis and numerical simulations of new model describing cancer. J. Comput. Appl. Math.422, 114899 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller, K. S. & Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations (Wiley, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salah, E. Y. et al., Conformable fractional-order modeling and analysis of HIV/AIDS transmission dynamics. Int. J. Differ. Equ.2024 (2024).
  • 15.Khan, H., Gomez-Aguilar, J. F., Abdeljawad, T. & Khan, A. Existence results and stability criteria for ABC-fuzzy-Volterra integro-differential equation. Fractals28(08), 2040048 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yadav, P., Jahan, S. & Nisar, K. S. Shifted fractional order Gegenbauer wavelets method for solving electrical circuits model of fractional order. Ain Shams Eng. J.14(11), 102544 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khan, H., Khan, A., Chen, W. & Shah, K. Stability analysis and a numerical scheme for fractional Klein-Gordon equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.42(2), 723–732 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Farman, M., Shehzad, A., Akgül, A., Baleanu, D. & De la Sen, M. Modelling and analysis of a measles epidemic model with the constant proportional Caputo operator. Symmetry15(2), 468 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hadhoud, A. R., Srivastava, H. M. & Rageh, A. A. Non-polynomial B-spline and shifted Jacobi spectral collocation techniques to solve time-fractional nonlinear coupled Burgers’ equations numerically. Adv. Differ. Equ.2021(1), 439 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ravichandran, C., Logeswari, K., Khan, A., Abdeljawad, T. & Gómez-Aguilar, J. F. An epidemiological model for computer virus with Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. Results Phys.51, 106601 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khan, A., Abdeljawad, T. & Alqudah, M. A. Neural networking study of worms in a wireless sensor model in the sense of fractal fractional. AIMS Math.8(11), 26406–26424 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hadhoud, A. R., Agarwal, P. & Rageh, A. A. Numerical treatments of the nonlinear coupled time-fractional Schrödinger equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.45(11), 7119–7143 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu, X., Arfan, M., Ur Rahman, M. & Fatima, B. Analysis of SIQR type mathematical model under Atangana-Baleanu fractional differential operator. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin.26(1), 98–112 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khan, M. A., DarAssi, M. H., Ahmad, I., Seyam, N. M. & Alzahrani, E. The transmission dynamics of an infectious disease model in fractional derivative with vaccination under real data. Comput. Biol. Med.181, 109069 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meetei, M. Z. et al. Analysis and simulation study of the HIV/AIDS model using the real cases. Plos One19(6), e0304735 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Addai, E. et al. A nonlinear fractional epidemic model for the Marburg virus transmission with public health education. Sci. Rep.13(1), 19292 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Agarwal, P., Ramadan, M. A., Rageh, A. A. & Hadhoud, A. R. A fractional-order mathematical model for analyzing the pandemic trend of COVID-19. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.45(8), 4625–4642 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li, B., Eskandari, Z. & Avazzadeh, Z. Dynamical behaviors of an SIR epidemic model with discrete time. Fractal Fract.6(11), 659 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.ur Rahman, M., Althobaiti, A., Riaz, M. B. & Al-Duais, F. S. A theoretical and numerical study on fractional order biological models with Caputo Fabrizio derivative. Fractal Fract.6(8), 446 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yadav, P., Jahan, S. & Nisar, K. S. Fractional order mathematical model of Ebola virus under Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo operator. Results Control Optim.13, 100332 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yadav, P., Jahan, S., Shah, K., Peter, O. J. & Abdeljawad, T. Fractional-order modelling and analysis of diabetes mellitus: Utilizing the Atangana-Baleanu Caputo (ABC) operator. Alex. Eng. J.81, 200–209 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmed, S., Jahan, S. & Nisar, K. S. Hybrid Fibonacci wavelet method to solve fractional-order logistic growth model. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.46(15), 16218–16231 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nisar, K. S., Farman, M., Abdel-Aty, M. & Cao, J. A review on epidemic models in sight of fractional calculus. Alex. Eng. J.75, 81–113 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aliasghari, G., Mesgarani, H., Nikan, O. & Avazzadeh, Z. On fractional order model of tumor growth with cancer stem cell. Fractal Fract.7(1), 27 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Özköse, F., Şenel, M. T. & Habbireeh, R. Fractional-order mathematical modelling of cancer cells-cancer stem cells-immune system interaction with chemotherapy. Math. Model. Numer. Simul. Appl.1(2), 67–83 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Atangana, A. Fractal-fractional differentiation and integration: Connecting fractal calculus and fractional calculus to predict complex system. Chaos Solitons Fractals102, 396–406 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Atangana, A. & Goufo, E. F. D. Some misinterpretations and lack of understanding in differential operators with no singular kernels. Open Phys.18(1), 594–612 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Asamoah, J. K. K. Fractal-fractional model and numerical scheme based on Newton polynomial for Q fever disease under Atangana-Baleanu derivative. Results Phys.34, 105189 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Haidong, Q. et al. Fractal–fractional dynamical system of Typhoid disease including protection from infection. Eng. Comput. 1–10 (2021).
  • 40.Khan, H., Li, Y., Khan, A. & Khan, A. Existence of solution for a fractional-order Lotka-Volterra reaction-diffusion model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.42(9), 3377–3387 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li, B., Zhang, T. & Zhang, C. Investigation of financial bubble mathematical model under fractal-fractional Caputo derivative. Fractals31(05), 1–13 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shah, K., Abdalla, B., Abdeljawad, T. & Alqudah, M. A. A fractal-fractional order model to study multiple sclerosis: A chronic disease. Fractals 2440010 (2024).
  • 43.Rezapour, S. et al. On the fractal-fractional Mittag-Leffler model of a COVID-19 and Zika Co-infection. Results Phys.55, 107118 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kanwal, T. et al. Dynamics of a model of polluted lakes via fractal-fractional operators with two different numerical algorithms. Chaos Solitons Fractals181, 114653 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rezapour, S., Etemad, S., Avcı, İ, Ahmad, H. & Hussain, A. A study on the fractal-fractional epidemic probability-based model of SARS-CoV-2 virus along with the Taylor operational matrix method for its Caputo version. J. Funct. Spaces2022(1), 2388557 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Farman, M., Sarwar, R. & Akgul, A. Modeling and analysis of sustainable approach for dynamics of infections in plant virus with fractal fractional operator. Chaos Solitons Fractals170, 113373 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Farman, M., Batool, M., Nisar, K. S., Ghaffari, A. S. & Ahmad, A. Controllability and analysis of sustainable approach for cancer treatment with chemotherapy by using the fractional operator. Results Phys.51, 106630 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jan, R., Razak, N. N. A., Qureshi, S., Ahmad, I. & Bahramand, S. Modeling Rift Valley fever transmission: Insights from fractal-fractional dynamics with the Caputo derivative. Math. Model. Control4(2), 163–177 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Atangana, A. & Araz, S. I. New Numerical Scheme with Newton Polynomial: Theory, Methods, and Applications (Academic Press, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Matignon, D. Stability results on fractional differential equations with applications to control. In Proceedings of Computational Engineering in Systems and Application Multiconference, vol. 2 9633–968.
  • 51.Ahmed, E., El-Sayed, A. & El-Saka, H. A. On some Routh-Hurwitz conditions for fractional order differential equations and their applications in Lorenz, Rössler, Chua and Chen systems. Phys. Lett. A358(1), 1–4 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Toufik, M. & Atangana, A. New numerical approximation of fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel: Application to chaotic models. Eur. Phys. J. Plus132, 1–16 (2017). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES