Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2005 Jul 8;102(29):10188–10193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503068102

The C-terminal lysines fine-tune P53 stress responses in a mouse model but are not required for stability control or transactivation

Kurt A Krummel *, Crystal J Lee *, Franck Toledo *,†, Geoffrey M Wahl *,
PMCID: PMC1177381  PMID: 16006521

Abstract

P53 is an unstable transcription factor that is mutated in a majority of human cancers. With a significant role in initiating cell elimination programs, a network has evolved to fine-tune P53 transcriptional output and prevent errant activation. Modifications of the C terminus have long been viewed as critical binary determinants of P53 stability or activation. However, these conclusions are based on in vitro transfection or biochemical analyses where the stoichiometries between P53 and its regulators are perturbed. Therefore, we tested the importance of the C-terminal regulatory region for P53 control in mice where the seven C-terminal lysines were changed to arginine (Trp-537KR). Surprisingly, the homozygous mutant mice are viable and phenotypically normal. We have functionally characterized the mutant protein in both MEFs and thymocytes, revealing the unexpected result that Trp-537KR exhibits a normal half-life and functions like WT P53 in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and in an E1A-ras xenograft tumor suppression assay. However, a significant difference is that P537KR is activated more easily by DNA damage in thymus than WT P53. Importantly, although MEFs encoding WT P53 spontaneously emerge from crisis to become immortal in a 3T3 growth protocol, we do not observe any such escape with the P537KR cells. We propose that the C-terminal modifications believed to be critical for proper P53 regulation are not essential, but contribute to a fine-tuning mechanism of homeostatic control in vivo.

Keywords: Mdm2, p53, tumor suppressor, Trp-53, ubiquitination


P53 can respond to a variety of stimuli to either initiate cell cycle arrest or initiate apoptosis. Therefore, it is critical to control the output of this short-lived transcription factor (1). It is generally accepted that P53 regulation involves competition between the E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 and histone acetyl transferases (HATs). MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of the conserved C-terminal lysines of P53 initiates proteasome-dependent degradation, while the HATs acetylate the same lysines, resulting in P53 stabilization and activation (2, 3). Other studies report that C-terminal lysine methylation is required for P53 stabilization (4), neddylation inhibits transactivation (3), and sumoylation may have positive or negative roles (5). Regardless of the modification, the C terminus is thought to be critical for P53 stability or activation. However, these conclusions are often based on nonnative conditions, where the ratios between P53 and its regulators are altered. Therefore, we tested the importance of the C-terminal regulatory region for P53 control in mice where the seven C-terminal lysines were changed to arginine (Trp-537KR).

Methods

Targeting Construct. Using ET recombination (GeneBridges, Dresden Germany), we recovered the WT Trp-53 locus from a 129 strain mouse BAC (a generous gift from Manuel Serrano, Spanish National Cancer Center, Madrid) with the following primers 5′-GAT AAG CAA GAC ATT GTA CCA GCA ATT AAC CCC CCA CCC CCA ACT CCA TAG CGG CCG CTG AAG ACG AAA GGG CCT CGT G-3′,5′-TGT TCT GAG CTC TGT GCT CTT TCC TAT CCA GCT AGA TAG TCA TAG CCA TCC GAT CGG CGC TAG CGG AGT GTA TAC TGG C-3′. This fragment comprises the genomic sequence of Trp-53 from 91 bp upstream of the beginning of exon 1 to 1,770 bp downstream of the last nucleotide of exon 11 in pACYC177 (NEB). The targeting construct contained extensive 5′ homology upstream of exon 2 (BamHI), followed by exons 2-10, then Exon 11 with the Trp-537KR mutation to the 3′ EcoRV site. The positive selection cassette fragment containing loxP-neo-loxP, from a modified pOG277 plasmid (6), follows the Trp-537KR mutation. The neo cassette introduces an additional EcoRI site that was used for Southern blot analyses. After the Neo cassette, 1.3 kb of Trp-53 3′ homology is present (EcoRV-ClaI). Finally, the thymidine kinase negative selection cassette is derived from the plasmid pNT and follows the 3′ homology region. Our final construct was assembled in pSP72N (Promega). Each exon, the intron-exon boundary, the neo and TK cassettes, and the entire 3′ homology region were sequenced to ensure Trp-53 status.

Homologous Recombination and Genotyping. PrmCre 129/SvJae ES cells (6) were electroporated with the linearized targeting construct. We screened G-418 and ganciclovir-resistant colonies for the presence of the EcoRI restriction site within the Neo cassette by using Southern blot hybridization of EcoRI-digested DNA with a 500-bp fragment 5′ (Eco0109I/StyI) and a 382-bp fragment 3′ (EcoRV/NotI) to the targeting construct as probes. Southern blotting was performed as described (7). Of 192 doubly resistant ES cell clones, 29 candidates were identified. The presence of the mutation was confirmed independently by PCR amplification in nine clones using primers flanking the mutation region 5′-TGG TGG TGG TGA CAG TTG TG-3′,5′-TCT CAG CCC TGA AGT CAT AAG-3′. The resulting PCR fragments were then digested with Bsu36I, because the 7KR mutation introduces this site. After digestion, a smaller band indicates the presence of the mutant. Two separate ES clones containing the targeted Trp-537KR allele were injected into blastocysts, which were then implanted into pseudopregnant females. Germ-line transmission was verified by genotyping MEFs from the breeding of two chimeras with Trp-53+/- mice. RNA was isolated from Trp-537KR/- MEFs, and we used a RT-PCR strategy to verify that the sequence was identical to the WT Trp-53 sequence except for the 7KR mutation. The chimeras were also bred to C57BL/6 Trp-53 mice to produce Trp-53+/7KR offspring. These offspring were genotyped, then interbred to produce homozygous mutant MEFs and mice. The Trp-53+/7KR mice were also backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice for functional studies to reflect the standard genetic background of Trp-53 mutant animals.

Cell Culture. Primary MEFs were isolated from 13.5-day-old embryos, genotyped, and cultured in DMEM with 15% FBS, 2-mercaptoethanol (0.1 mM), l-glutamine (2 mM), and antibiotics. MEFs were used at a passage number <5 for all analyses except 3T3, which was performed as described (8). ES cells were cultured on gelatinized plates on a feeder layer of mitomycin C-treated (Sigma) STO feeders in DMEM with nonessential amino acids (0.01 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (0.1 mM), l-glutamine (2 mM) (Specialty Media), 15% FBS (HyClone), penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), and supplemented with lymphocyte inhibitory factor (a generous gift of J. Rossant, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto).

Cells were γ irradiated at room temperature with a Co-60 radiation source. Other drugs used for cell treatments were: cycloheximide (U.S. Biological), resuspended in ethanol and used at 100 μg/ml, Nutlin was prepared in DMSO and then used at 10 μM, (a generous gift from L. Vassilev, Roche Research Center, Nutley, NJ), adriamycin was prepared in water at 5 mg/ml (Sigma), and MG132 was prepared in DMSO at 10 mM (Calbiochem). 2KO cells (Trp-53null, Mdm2null MEFs) were provided by A. Levine (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton). Transfection was carried out by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Retrovirus Preparation and MEF Infection. Retroviral stocks were prepared for plasmids pBABE-HrasV12 with puromycin resistance and pWZL-E1A12S with resistance to hygromycin B. Fifteen micrograms of each plasmid was cotransfected with 5 μg of pMDG (a gift from I. Verma, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) into 293 gag-pol cells by using CaPO4-based transfection. We collected virus-containing media on days 2, 3, and 4 after transfection. Log phase cells were infected with pWZL-E1A12S virus or sequentially infected with the pWZL-E1A12S and pBABE-HrasV12 viruses in media plus 8 μg/ml polybrene. Media was changed the following day. Twenty-four hours after changing media, selection was performed with hygromycin B (75 μg/ml; Boehringer) for 1 week, or puromycin (2 μg/ml; Sigma) for 2 days.

For the nude mouse tumorigenesis assay, single flanks of nude mice (NxGen Bioscience) were injected s.c. with a single-cell suspension of 5 × 106 MEFs in 200 μl of PBS, and tumors were allowed to form for 2 weeks before harvest. Sites of injection were dissected and any masses were removed and weighed.

Immunofluorescence. MEFs were cultured on 12-mm glass coverslips, exposed to adriamycin, and analyzed 24 h later. Coverslips were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde, blocked with 10% goat serum, and stained with primary antibodies to P53 CM-5 1:5,000 (Novacastra Laboratories), and secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 488 goat-α-rabbit 1:1,000 (Molecular Probes). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoescht dye 33342. Images were captured on a Zeiss epifluorescence microscope.

Western Blots. Cells were lysed on the dish in a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 10 mM NaF, and Complete Mini Protease Inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics), at 4°C for 30 min. Lysates were scraped, then spun at 6,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. Protein concentration in the supernatant was determined by using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay. Lysates were separated on single percentage SDS/PAGE gels, then electrophoretically transferred to poly(vinylidene difluoride), using standard procedures. Blots were incubated in 5% nonfat dried milk in TBST (0.02 M Tris, pH 7.6/0.35 M NaCl/0.1% Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature before probing with primary antibodies against P53 (CM-5) and α-actin (Sigma). Secondary antibodies used include peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG (Pierce). Probed blots were incubated with Pierce Supersignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate. Blots were exposed to x-ray films.

Ubiquitination. Ubiquitination was detected as described (9). Briefly, we transfected MEFs that are deleted for both Trp-53 and Mdm2 with exogenous Trp-53 or Trp-537KR, Mdm2, and Hisubiquitin. Cells were cultured for 24 h, then MG132 was added for an additional 3 h to one replicate sample of each genotype. We lysed the cells under conditions that prevent deubiquitination, and purified the lysates with Ni-agarose, performed SDS/PAGE, and immunoblotted for P53.

Quantitative PCR. Total RNA was extracted by using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and reverse transcribed by using Superscript III RT (Invitrogen). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on an Applied Biosystems PRISM 7700 sequence detection system using Platinum SYBR Green mastermix (Invitrogen). Primer sequences are available upon request for detecting cDNA sequence of Trp-53, p21, Mdm2, Noxa, and Puma, and control genes H6pd and Hprt.

Flow Cytometry. For cell cycle analyses, log phase cells were irradiated with 0.5, 2, or 6 Gy γ irradiation and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then pulse-labeled for 1 h with BrdUrd (10 μM), fixed in 70% ethanol, and stained with FITC anti-BrdUrd and propidium iodide as described (7). Apoptosis assays were performed on E1A expressing MEFs that were treated for 24 h with 0.25 μg/ml adriamycin or treated in culture with varying doses of γ irradiation. Thymocytes were isolated from mice exposed to whole-body irradiation at varying doses from a Co-60 source. The treated cells were harvested and stained with Annexin-V-FITC for analysis. For both cell cycle and apoptosis, the cells were sorted by using a Becton Dickinson FACScan machine, and data were analyzed by using Becton Dickinson cellquest pro, or winmdi 2.8.

Results and Discussion

We generated a mouse model of Trp-53 with C-terminal lysine mutations, shown by transfection studies to be stable and transcriptionally active (2, 10) (Fig. 1 a and b). Because the mouse Trp-53 gene contains seven lysines in the C terminus, all were changed to arginine (Trp-537KR). The sequence-confirmed construct (see Methods) was linearized and electroporated into PrmCre ES cells to allow excision of the Neo cassette upon passage through the male germ line, and putative recombinants were screened by both Southern blotting and allele-specific PCR (Fig. 1 c and d) (6, 7). Two homologous recombinant ES clones (designated B52 and B54) were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to produce Trp-537KR chimeras and Trp-53+/7KR mice. Transcription of the WT and Trp-537KR alleles were equivalent by quantitative RT-PCR analysis (data not shown). The entire Trp-53 coding region from Trp-537KR/7KR MEFs was sequenced and found to be WT at all codons except for the expected mutations of the seven C-terminal lysines (Fig. 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) (11).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Mice harboring the Trp-537KR mutant allele are viable. (a) Comparison of human and mouse C-terminal regions of Trp-53 in each species. Lysine residues are shown in bold. Numbering of amino acids in this region is shown for each species. (b) Homologous recombination construct diagram showing the endogenous Trp-53 locus with recombination product, followed by excision of LoxP-flanked Neo cassette upon passage through male germ line of protamine cre mice. The construct contains extensive 5′ homology upstream of exon 2, followed by exons 2-10. Exon 11 with the Trp-537KR mutation is shown in gray. The neomycin-positive selection cassette follows the Trp-537KR mutation region, and 1.3 kb of 3′ homology follows 3′ to the Neo cassette. Note that the neo cassette introduces an additional EcoRI site that was used for Southern blot analyses. Finally, the thymidine kinase negative selection cassette is shown as a white box following the 3′ homology region. Southern blot probes are shown as hashed boxes in their genomic locations 3′ and 5′ to the Trp-53 genomic sequence. (c) Southern blot of representative ES cell clones. The presence of the Neo cassette changes the hybridization pattern from a 17-kb EcoRI fragment for WT with both probes, to a 12.2-kb band for the 5′ probe, and a 5.9-kb band with the 3′ probe. (d) PCR genotype of ES cell clones and MEFs to confirm the presence of the Trp-537KR allele. The introduction of the Trp-537KR mutation introduces a silent Bsu36I site, which is used for detection of the allele. PCR is performed on the region surrounding the mutations. Only the Trp-537KR allele contains a cut site for Bsu36I in this PCR product, so the presence of the lower band indicates the presence of the Trp-537KR allele. (e) The expected and observed Mendelian ratios of mice produced from Trp-53+/Trp537KR mice are shown. The heterozygous mice have been backcrossed to a C57BL/6 background, and then intercrossed for this analysis. The differences between observed and expected frequencies are not significant by χ2 analysis (P = 0.05).

Expectations based on the stability and hyperactivity of the human P536KR protein suggested the possibility of early embryonic lethality, as observed in both Mdm2 and MdmX knockout mice (12, 13). However, Trp-537KR/7KR animals were physically indistinguishable from their WT (i.e., Trp-53) littermates, and the Mendelian ratio of Trp-537KR/7KR and Trp-53+/7KR mice was normal.

The apparent normality of the Trp-537KR mice was unexpected, leading us to thoroughly evaluate the properties of the encoded protein. Immunofluorescence analyses revealed that, during exponential growth and after adriamycin induced DNA damage, the subcellular localization and abundance of P53 and P537KR appeared equivalent (Fig. 7, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). More precise quantifications of protein levels by Western blotting demonstrate that WT and P537KR levels in normally growing early passage MEFs are similar, and that their increases in response to γ irradiation and adriamycin are equivalent (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

P537KR protein abundance, stabilization, half-life, and ubiquitination are similar to WT. (a) Western blot to determine Trp-53 protein levels in early passage MEFs in culture. MEFs less than passage 5 were treated with 0.25 μg/ml adriamycin for 24 h, followed by SDS/PAGE and detection with the anti-P53 antibody (CM-5). Alternatively, cells were treated with 5 Gy γ-irradiation, then allowed to recover for either 2 or 24 h before lysis. Actin is shown as a loading control. (b) Western blot detection of P53 in cells treated with the 10 μM proteasome inhibitor MG132 or 10 μM Nutlin for 4 h. (c) Determination of P53 half-life in early passage MEFs. MEFs were treated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide for the times indicated, then analyzed by Western blot. Trp-53 was detected with either CM-5 or Ab7, and actin was used as a loading control. P53 and actin were quantitated by using IMAGEQUANT. (d) Ubiquitination detection in P53/MDM2 deficient cells was performed as described (9). From left to right, His-ubiquitin and Mdm2 were introduced with exogenous Trp-53 (lanes 1 and 2) or Trp-537KR (lanes 3 and 4). After 24 h, 30 μM MG132 was added for 3 h (lanes 2 and 4), and cells were lysed. Lane 5 contains Trp-53 and His-ubiquitin without Mdm2. Lane 6 contains P53 and MDM2 without His-ubiquitin. Lysates were incubated with Ni-Agarose to bind His-ubiquitinated proteins. After several washes, bound proteins were eluted and SDS/PAGE was performed. Finally, we performed Western blot detection of P53 with CM-5 on the purified proteins. Molecular weights are indicated on the right.

P53 levels are largely determined by MDM2-dependent proteasomal degradation (14). The proteasome inhibitor MG132 led to equivalent increases in the levels of WT and P537KR, implying that their steady state levels are largely determined by proteasome-dependent processes. However, this result does not indicate the extent to which P537KR stability is regulated by MDM2 because additional ubiquitin ligases have recently been reported to mediate p53 degradation (14). Therefore, we used Nutlin to determine its effects on the abundance of WT and P537KR (15). We investigated the specific contribution of MDM2 to P537KR destabilization by using Nutlin, a small molecule that selectively inhibits the P53-MDM2 interaction by binding to MDM2 in the P53-binding pocket. Nutlin induced similar levels of accumulation for both WT and P537KR proteins (Fig. 2b). This finding indicates that P537KR protein degradation is determined primarily by MDM2, especially because Nutlin is unlikely to affect binding of another ubiquitin ligase for P53, such as PIRH2, which binds to a different region of P53 (16). These data contrast with previous transfection assays indicating that the human 6KR mutant is resistant to MDM2-mediated degradation (2). However, we observed that cotransfection of either MDM2 or HDM2 with human WT P53 or the 6KR mutant resulted in similar extents of degradation of both proteins (data not shown). Therefore, as in the mouse, mutation of the human C-terminal lysines does not generate an MDM2-resistant P53.

To directly address the stability of P537KR, the protein half-lives of P537KR and WT were compared in early passage MEFs treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. In accord with the data reported above, the half-life of P537KR was ≈20 min, which is equivalent to that of WT and consistent with numerous previous studies (Fig. 2c) (17). This finding is in stark contrast to the prediction that the seven C-terminal lysines are critical for P53 degradation.

Proteasomal degradation requires the addition of a ubiquitin chain on at least one lysine (14), or by recently reported ubiquitin-independent mechanisms (18, 19). Therefore, we determined whether P537KR is ubiquitinated. Attempts to detect endogenous ubiquitination on WT or P537KR were unsuccessful, even in the presence of exogenous Mdm2 and proteasome inhibition (data not shown). However, transfecting exogenous Trp-53, Mdm2, and His-ubiquitin into MEFs deleted for both Trp-53 and Mdm2 enabled detection of ubiquitinated WT and P537KR (Fig. 2d). Importantly, the ubiquitination patterns are qualitatively different. It is unclear which of the ubiquitinated molecules contain multiple mono- or polyubiquitinations (20), but MG132 increases many of the higher molecular weight ubiquitinated species for WT, and not for P537KR. A reasonable interpretation is that these bands correspond to ubiquitination of the seven C-terminal lysines. Although no increase as dramatic as this is observed in the P537KR lane, MG132 treatment does increase some ubiquitinated species, implying instability of the corresponding P537KR molecules.

The induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis are two Trp-53 functions critical for tumor suppression, and C-terminal acetylation has been suggested to be important for the execution of both. Analysis of the cell cycle arrest response in MEFs exposed to increasing doses of ionizing radiation revealed the previously reported lack of cell cycle arrest in Trp-53null cells exposed to high radiation doses. However both Trp-53 and Trp-537KR MEFs exhibited significant decreases in the S-phase fraction and increases in G1 content (Fig. 3 a and b). MEFs with Trp-53 are refractory to apoptosis and instead undergo G1 arrest (21). To analyze the apoptotic potential of P537KR, we infected MEFs with the E1A oncogene to sensitize them to apoptosis after DNA damage (22). Whereas Trp-53null MEFs exhibited little detectable apoptosis under these conditions, Trp-53 and Trp-537KR E1A-MEFs exhibited equivalent and substantial apoptotic levels (Fig. 3 c and d). Furthermore, analyses of apoptosis in thymi isolated directly from irradiated mice again demonstrated the response to be largely P53 dependent and equivalent in both Trp-53 and Trp-537KR animals at all radiation doses used (Fig. 3 e and f, and data not shown).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cell cycle and apoptosis response of P537KR is normal in MEFs and thymocytes. (a) Cell cycle arrest analysis in MEFs. Asynchronous cell populations of Trp-53null, Trp-53, and Trp-537KR MEFs were untreated or treated with 6 Gy γ irradiation, then analyzed by FACS after 24 h. A representative experiment for cells of each genotype is shown. (b) Cell cycle arrest analysis summary. The graph shows the G1/S ratios and SD from at least four independent experiments for each genotype from independent MEFs. (c) Analysis of apoptosis in vitro. Asynchronous cultures of E1A expressing Trp-53-/-, Trp-53, and Trp-537KR MEFs were untreated or treated with 6 Gyγ irradiation, and analyzed for apoptosis after 24 h by staining with Annexin-FITC and FACS. A representative experiment for cells of each genotype is shown. (d) Analysis of apoptosis in E1A-MEFs. The bar graph shows the mean percentage of apoptotic cells and the SD from at least three independent experiments for each genotype with independent MEFs. Asynchronous cultures of E1A expressing Trp-53-/-, Trp-53, and Trp-537KR MEFs were untreated or treated with various doses of γ irradiation, or 0.25 μg/ml adriamycin, then analyzed after 24 h by staining with Annexin-FITC and FACS. (e) Analysis of apoptosis in vivo. In four independent experiments, mice were untreated or exposed to 10 Gy whole-body irradiation. After 4 h, we measured the percentage of apoptotic thymocytes. Each experiment consisted of two mice for each genotype (Trp-53null, Trp-53, and Trp-537KR), one untreated and one irradiated. Representative FACS data are plotted. (f) Summary of in vivo apoptosis data. The mean percentage of apoptotic cells and SD from the experiments are shown. Black bars, WT P53; gray bars, P537KR; empty bars, P53null.(g) Xenograft assay of tumorigenicity. Equal numbers of E1A and Ras expressing MEFs of the indicated genotypes were injected into the flanks of nude mice and tumors were allowed to grow for 14 days. Mice were killed, and the weight of tumors was determined. Results are expressed as the weight of age-matched tumors. Mean and SD were calculated from six tumors for each genotype. Note that the y axis is a logarithmic scale.

We estimated the tumor suppressive capacity of each P53 allele by infecting MEFs of each genotype with retroviruses encoding the E1A and Ras oncogenes, followed by injection of the resulting cells into the flanks of nude mice (7). Injections of E1A-Ras Trp-53null MEFs produced large, rapidly growing tumors, whereas E1A-Ras MEFs expressing either WT or P537KR generated very small masses (Fig. 3g). We infer that the tumor suppressive function of P537KR is equivalent to that of WT using this xenograft assay.

In contrast to the prediction of hyperactivity of P537KR, based on in vitro studies, the above results suggest that WT and P537KR are functionally equivalent. We directly analyzed transcriptional output of both alleles in vitro in MEFs and in vivo in thymocytes. In agreement with the Western blot and functional analyses, target gene induction by P537KR was similar to that of WT in MEFs. However, we have often noted high basal activities for both alleles in putatively unstressed cells in culture, perhaps as a response to high oxygen or other cell culture related stresses. To eliminate such variables, we analyzed the irradiation dose-response of WT and P537KR in mouse thymocytes. In contrast to what was observed in MEFs, Western blot analysis showed that P537KR protein was stabilized at a dose of 1 Gy, whereas WT protein remained undetectable. Furthermore, at all radiation doses analyzed, P537KR was more abundant than WT (Fig. 4a). Consistent with these results, transactivation of the P53 target genes p21, Mdm2, Puma, and Noxa by quantitative PCR (Fig. 4b) demonstrated that P537KR elicited more robust target gene induction than WT. Therefore, in vivo, Trp-537KR encodes a protein that is more easily induced and activated than Trp-53, although the difference is more modest than suggested by in vitro analyses.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

γ irradiation in thymus reveals a sensitized transcriptional response of P537KR.(a) P53 protein induction after γ irradiation. WT P53, P537KR, and P53null mice were left untreated or submitted to increasing doses of γ irradiation as indicated. After 3 h, thymi were removed, and protein extracts were prepared for Western blot. P53 was detected with CM-5, and actin is used as a loading control. (b) Transcriptional analysis of P53 target genes in vivo. The thymi used for Western blot detection of P53 levels in a were divided and analyzed by QPCR for the four P53 target genes shown. Treatments for all genotypes are depicted relative to untreated WT P53, which is set to 1. WT P53 is shown in black bars, and P537KR is shown in gray bars. For P53null, only the response to 4-Gy irradiation is shown (empty bars). The data represent the results of duplicate experiments.

Each of the assays reported above is limited in that an acute function of P53 is evaluated. To assess the effects of P53 activity over a prolonged time period, we determined the consequences of Trp-53 and Trp-537KR expression by using an in vitro 3T3 immortalization protocol (23). Over time, Trp-53 MEFs exhibited increased doubling time, entered crisis, and emerged as immortal variants (24) (Fig. 5a). Trp-53null MEFs grew more rapidly than Trp-53 MEFs, failed to enter crisis, and spontaneously immortalized (Fig. 5a). By contrast, Trp-537KR MEF grew at about the same rate as Trp-53 until passage 7, then slowed down, and senesced consistently at approximately passage 10 (Fig. 5a). As seen in Fig. 5b, by passage 12, Trp-537KR MEFs exhibited a senescent “fried egg” morphology, increased cell size, and failure to increase in number. Therefore, the elevated activity of P537KR is manifested over numerous generations in vitro by a predisposition to an apparently irreversible senescence.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

P537KR MEFs exhibit an increased sensitivity to culture stress in a 3T3 protocol. (a) Analysis of immortalization using a 3T3 growth protocol. A representative graph showing sensitivity to senescence by P537KR MEFs is displayed. WT P53 (black diamonds), P53null (empty squares), and P537KR (gray triangles) MEFs were freshly isolated from embryos 13.5 days postcoitum, counted, and serially passaged at 3 × 105 cells in duplicate every 3 days for up to 20 passages. (b) Representative images are shown from passage 12 MEFs showing P537KR cells displaying a senescence-like morphology.

The fact that P537KR has the same abundance and half-life as endogenous WT disproves the model that ubiquitination of P53 C-terminal lysines directly determines its degradation. There are several alternative possibilities for the regulation of P53 stability. First, it is possible that ubiquitination of alternative sites by MDM2 can mediate P53 degradation, but those in the C terminus are preferred or more accessible. An alternative explanation stems from the observation that some proteins are degraded by the proteasome without a requirement for their own ubiquitination (18, 19). This raises the formal possibility that mere association of ubiquitinated MDM2 with P53 may be sufficient for degradation of the entire complex by the proteasome. Our findings also disprove the model that C-terminal lysine acetylation or other modifications are required for function. Indeed, our data show that in the absence of a capacity for C-terminal lysine modifications, P537KR is equally or more active than WT.

Therefore, these data suggest that the C-terminal lysines may have evolved to enable the fine-tuning of P53 activity over the lifespan of the metazoans in which it functions. For example, without C-terminal ubiquitination, perhaps P537KR is cleared less efficiently from target gene promoters, enabling more efficient target gene activation than WT. In MEFs passaged in vitro, this activation is not detectable, but in longer term analyses involving exposure to more subtle stresses, or in vivo, the importance of these residues is manifested.

Finally, our data regarding P53 stability control may have broad implications for the regulation of numerous other short-lived transcription factors whose degradation is mediated by interaction with ubiquitin ligases. Although P53 has been intensively studied for many years by using in vitro models, our studies raise questions about the applicability of the mechanisms deduced from these studies for regulating P53 stability and function in vivo.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Figures

Acknowledgments

We thank Lyubomir Vassilev for the invaluable Nutlin reagents, J. Rossant for LIF, A. Francis Stewart (University of Technology, Dresden, Germany) for ET Recombination, Manuel Serrano for the mouse BAC used in producing our construct, and Mark Wade for many helpful discussions. This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA100845 and CA61449 (to G.M.W.), National Institutes of Health Grant 5 T32 CA009370-23 (to K.A.K.), and a fellowship from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (to F.T.).

Author contributions: K.A.K. and G.M.W. designed research; K.A.K., C.J.L., and F.T. performed research; K.A.K., C.J.L., F.T., and G.M.W. analyzed data; and K.A.K. and G.M.W. wrote the paper.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

References

  • 1.Wahl, G. M., Stommel, J. M., Krummel, K. & Wade, M. (2005) in 25 Years of P53 Research, eds. Hainaut, P. & Wiman, K. (Springer, Berlin), p. 446.
  • 2.Rodriguez, M. S., Desterro, J. M., Lain, S., Lane, D. P. & Hay, R. T. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8458-8467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xirodimas, D. P., Saville, M. K., Bourdon, J. C., Hay, R. T. & Lane, D. P. (2004) Cell 118, 83-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chuikov, S., Kurash, J. K., Wilson, J. R., Xiao, B., Justin, N., Ivanov, G. S., McKinney, K., Tempst, P., Prives, C., Gamblin, S. J., et al. (2004) Nature 432, 353-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muller, S., Ledl, A. & Schmidt, D. (2004) Oncogene 23, 1998-2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O'Gorman, S., Dagenais, N. A., Qian, M. & Marchuk, Y. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14602-14607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jimenez, G. S., Nister, M., Stommel, J. M., Beeche, M., Barcarse, E. A., Zhang, X. Q., O'Gorman, S. & Wahl, G. M. (2000) Nat. Genet. 26, 37-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones, S. N., Sands, A. T., Hancock, A. R., Vogel, H., Donehower, L. A., Linke, S. P., Wahl, G. M. & Bradley, A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14106-14111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xirodimas, D., Saville, M. K., Edling, C., Lane, D. P. & Lain, S. (2001) Oncogene 20, 4972-4983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luo, J., Su, F., Chen, D., Shiloh, A. & Gu, W. (2000) Nature 408, 377-381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jimenez, G. S., Nister, M., Beeche, M., Stommel, J. S., Barcarse, E., O'Gorman, S. & Wahl, G. M. (2005) Nat. Genet. 37, 205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jones, S. N., Roe, A. E., Donehower, L. A. & Bradley, A. (1995) Nature 378, 206-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Migliorini, D., Denchi, E. L., Danovi, D., Jochemsen, A., Capillo, M., Gobbi, A., Helin, K., Pelicci, P. G. & Marine, J. C. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5527-5538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brooks, C. L. & Gu, W. (2004) Cell Cycle 3, 895-899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vassilev, L. T., Vu, B. T., Graves, B., Carvajal, D., Podlaski, F., Filipovic, Z., Kong, N., Kammlott, U., Lukacs, C., Klein, C., Fotouhi, N. & Liu, E. A. (2004) Science 303, 844-848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leng, R. P., Lin, Y., Ma, W., Wu, H., Lemmers, B., Chung, S., Parant, J. M., Lozano, G., Hakem, R. & Benchimol, S. (2003) Cell 112, 779-791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moll, U. M. & Petrenko, O. (2003) Mol. Cancer Res. 1, 1001-1008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen, X., Chi, Y., Bloecher, A., Aebersold, R., Clurman, B. E. & Roberts, J. M. (2004) Mol. Cell 16, 839-847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bossis, G., Ferrara, P., Acquaviva, C., Jariel-Encontre, I. & Piechaczyk, M. (2003) Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7425-7436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li, M., Brooks, C. L., Wu-Baer, F., Chen, D., Baer, R. & Gu, W. (2003) Science 302, 1972-1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kastan, M. B., Zhan, Q., el-Deiry, W. S., Carrier, F., Jacks, T., Walsh, W. V., Plunkett, B. S., Vogelstein, B. & Fornace, A. J., Jr. (1992) Cell 71, 587-597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lowe, S. W., Ruley, H. E., Jacks, T. & Housman, D. E. (1993) Cell 74, 957-967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Todaro, G. J. & Green, H. (1963) J. Cell Biol. 17, 299-313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Parrinello, S., Samper, E., Krtolica, A., Goldstein, J., Melov, S. & Campisi, J. (2003) Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 741-747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Figures
pnas_0503068102_1.pdf (505.3KB, pdf)
pnas_0503068102_2.pdf (253.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES