Abstract
Background
Constructing suppressive regimens in individuals with MDR HIV-1 can be challenging. We assessed populations with limited ART options in the BRIGHTE study using FTR-based regimens and the VIKING-3 study using DTG-based regimens.
Methods
BRIGHTE was a phase 3 study (N=371; Randomized Cohort [RC], n=272; Non-randomized Cohort, n=99) in adults failing current ART (HIV-1 RNA > 400 c/mL) with ≤ 2 fully active approved ARVs. Participants (pts) with 1 or 2 active ARVs entered the RC and received open-label FTR + optimized background therapy (OBT) after an 8-day blinded placebo-controlled period. In the RC, the most common agent in initial OBT was DTG (84%), with 64% taking it twice daily (BID). VIKING-3 (n=183) was a single-arm open-label phase 3 study in adults with INI-resistant virus receiving DTG 50 mg BID + failing regimen (without raltegravir or elvitegravir) through Day 7, then the regimen was optimized with ≥ 1 fully active ARV and DTG continued. Virologic and immunologic response was analyzed by baseline (BL) demographics and characteristics.
Results
BRIGHTE pts were male (n=290, 78%), median age 48 years and White (n=259, 70%). Observed antiviral response in the RC was 81% (< 40 c/mL, n=128) and 88% (< 400 c/mL, n=140). Mean CD4 increase from BL was 204.7 cells/mm3, with BL mean CD4 count 152.5 cells/mm3. VIKING-3 pts were male (n=141, 77%), median age 48 years and 71% (n=130) White. Antiviral response observed in VIKING-3 was 84% (< 50 c/mL, n=101) and 93% (< 400 c/mL, n=111). Mean CD4 increase was 192 cells/mm3, with BL mean CD4 count 202 cells/mm3. Safety across study populations was as follows: BRIGHTE (RC), n=92 (34%) serious adverse events (AEs), n=57 (21%) drug-related AEs and n=7 (3%) AEs leading to withdrawal; VIKING-3, n=60 (33%) serious AEs, n=52 (28%) drug-related AEs and n=8 (4%) AEs leading to withdrawal.
Conclusion
Despite limited ARV options in individuals with MDR HIV-1, data demonstrate that over 96 weeks both DTG (BID) and FTR-based regimens provide robust viral suppression and CD4 T-cell improvement. Although differences in BL characteristics exist, immunosuppression was more profound in BRIGHTE pts. FTR and DTG were commonly used together in BRIGHTE, engaging different mechanisms of action. Data provide further support for effective ARVs for individuals living with MDR HIV-1.
Disclosures
Antonella Castagna, MD, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Honoraria|Merck Sharp & Dohme: Advisor/Consultant|Merck Sharp & Dohme: Grant/Research Support|Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria|ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV Healthcare: Grant/Research Support|ViiV Healthcare: Honoraria Natalia Gregori, MD, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: employee Iacopo Marcon, PhD, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: employee Fangfang Du, MS in Statistics, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Bo Li, PhD, GSK: Employee Marcia Wang, PhD, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Alftan Dyson, PharmD, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: Employee Clifford B. Jones, BSc MSc MB ChB, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: Employee Manyu Prakash, PhD, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: employee Andrew Clark, MD, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: employee