Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Dec 30;16(12):e76636. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76636

Management of Unruptured Infectious Intracranial Aneurysms in Infective Endocarditis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Anh Tran Hue 1, Tatsuya Tanaka 1,, Fumitaka Yamane 2, Hiroshi Itokawa 1, Kimihiro Nakahara 1, Akira Matsuno 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11779502  PMID: 39881902

Abstract

Infectious intracranial aneurysms (IIAs) are rare lesions with fragile arterial walls located within the aneurysms, carrying a high risk of rupture. Standard management often involves antibiotic therapy and parent artery occlusion; however, the latter carries a significant risk of cerebral infarction. This report presents a case of an unruptured IIA following cerebral infarction, successfully treated with coil embolization while preserving the parent artery.

A 54-year-old man with a history of smoking and alcohol consumption presented with fever and impaired consciousness. Upon admission, he exhibited signs of sepsis and meningitis, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8. Imaging revealed multiple cerebral infarctions alongside embolic lesions in the kidney and spleen. Transthoracic echocardiography confirmed mitral valve infective endocarditis. The patient was started on antibiotics and underwent mitral valve repair on hospital day 4. On hospital day 44, MRI and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) identified a 5-mm unruptured aneurysm in the left middle cerebral artery, consistent with an IIA. Coil embolization was performed on hospital day 60 under general anesthesia, achieving complete aneurysm obliteration without compromising the parent artery. Postoperatively, the patient experienced no new infarctions and demonstrated a favorable recovery, leading to discharge on hospital day 110. Follow-up MRI and MRA performed 18 months post-treatment confirmed the absence of aneurysm recurrence.

This case highlights the importance of individualized treatment strategies in managing IIAs. While parent artery occlusion remains the standard approach, coil embolization offers a viable alternative in select cases, particularly for preserving parent artery integrity and reducing the risk of cerebral infarction.

Keywords: acute ischemic stroke, cerebral infarction, coil embolization, endovascular therapy, infective endocarditis, intracranial infectious aneurysm, valvular disease

Introduction

Infectious intracranial aneurysms (IIAs) are rare but potentially life-threatening complications of infective endocarditis (IE), occurring in approximately 2-10% of cases [1-4]. Timely diagnosis and management are crucial, as the rupture of an IIA can lead to catastrophic outcomes [5-7]. Systemic antibiotic therapy is the primary treatment for unruptured IIAs and can often result in aneurysmal shrinkage or resolution [5-7]. However, conservative treatment alone is associated with high mortality in cases of rupture or progressive aneurysmal enlargement, necessitating endovascular or surgical intervention [5-7].

IIAs are commonly located in peripheral cerebral arteries and are characterized by fragile vessel walls, a fusiform shape, and small size [8]. These features often require parent artery occlusion during endovascular treatment [8], which carries a significant risk of ischemic complications. To mitigate this risk, various treatment strategies have been applied, including coil embolization, aneurysm resection with bypass surgery, and pre-occlusion balloon test occlusion [9-11]. Despite these advances, an optimal treatment strategy for IIAs remains undefined, highlighting the need for individualized approaches.

This report describes a case of an unruptured IIA that developed following a cerebral embolism secondary to IE. The case highlights the success of coil embolization in preserving parent artery integrity and includes a review of the literature on unruptured IIAs, focusing on treatment indications and management strategies.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a fever and impaired consciousness that had developed over several days. The patient’s medical history includes disc herniation, hepatitis C, a 10-cigarette-per-day smoking habit, and regular alcohol consumption of approximately 120 g four times per week. Upon admission, body temperature was 39.2°C, heart rate 120 beats per minute, blood pressure 130/91 mmHg, respiratory rate 24 breaths per minute, and percutaneous oxygen saturation 99% on room air. Neurological examination revealed a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 (E3V2M3), neck stiffness, and no limb paralysis. The oral examination noted multiple dental caries and tooth loss.

Laboratory investigations revealed leukopenia (WBC count, 3,450/μL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 38,000/μL), elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, 27.4 mg/dL), and coagulopathy (D-dimer, 30.8 μg/mL). CSF analysis showed a cell count of 154/μL, protein level of 122.2 mg/dL, and glucose level of 39 mg/dL. The initial laboratory tests are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Laboratory test on initial presentation.

MCV: Mean Corpuscular Volume; MCHC: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration; RDW: Red Cell Distribution Width; MPV: Mean Platelet Volume; BUN: Blood Urea Nitrogen; ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase.

Laboratory test Result Normal range
WBCs 3,450 /μL 4,000-8,000 /μL
RBCs 4.30 x 106/μL 4.35-5.55 x 106/μL
Hemoglobin 13.6 g/dL 13.7-16.8 g/dl
Hematocrit 38.10% 40.7-550.1 %
MCV 88.6 fL 83.6-98.2 fl
MCHC 35.70% 31.7-35.3 %
RDW 14.0 fL 11.8-14.5 fL
MPV 11.5 fL 8-12 fL
Platelet Count 38,000 /μL 140,000-340,000/μL
Neutrophils 93% 38.5-80.5%
Lymphocytes 3.00% 16.5-49.5 %
Monocytes 3.30% 2.0-10.0%
Eosinophils 0.00% 0.0-8.5 %
Basophils 0.60% 0.0-2.5 %
Glucose 113 mg/dL 73-109 mg/dL
BUN 14.9 mg/dL 8.0-20.0 mg/dL
Creatinine 1.17 mg/dL 0.65-1.07 mg/dL
Sodium 136 mEq/L 138-145 mEq/L
Potassium 3.7 mEq/L 3.6-4.8 mEq/L
Chloride 103 mEq/L 101-108 mEq/L
Calcium 8.1 mg/dL 8.8-10.1 mg/dL
Phosphorous 1.8 mg/dL 2.7-4.6 mg/dL
Protein, Total 5.4 g/dL 6.6-8.1 g/dL
Albumin 2.5 g/dL 3.4-5.4 g/dL
Bilirubin, Total 3.3 mg/dL 0.4-1.5 mg/dL
ALT 58 U/L 10-42 U/L
AST 101 U/L 13-30 U/L
Alkaline Phosphatase 72 U/L 38-113 U/L
Lactate 0.75 mmol/L 0.7-2.1 mmol/L
C-Reactive Protein 27.40 mg/L 0.00-0.14 mg/dL
Procalcitonin 9.43 ng/mL <0.05 ng/mL
D-dimer 30.8 μg/mL <1.0 μg/mL
CSF, cell count 154 /μL
CSF, protein 122.2 mg/dL 10.0-35.0 mg/dL
CSF, glucose 39 mg/dL 50-80 mg/dL

A CT scan of the head, performed without the intravenous administration of contrast material, showed hypodense areas in the left cerebellar hemisphere and left parietal-occipital region, consistent with cerebral infarction (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Initial head CT.

Figure 1

(A, B, C): Non-contrast head CT images; (D, E, F): Contrast-enhanced head CT images. Multiple infarcts are observed in the left cerebellum, left temporal lobe, and parietal lobe. No evidence of brain tumors, brain abscesses, venous sinus thrombosis, or major cerebral artery occlusion is detected.

Contrast-enhanced thoracoabdominal CT showed wedge-shaped hypodense areas in the right kidney and spleen, consistent with infarctions (Figures 2A-2B). Transthoracic echocardiography revealed two 30-mm linear vegetations on the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve, confirming mitral valve infective endocarditis (Figure 2C).

Figure 2. Abdominal CT and transthoracic echocardiography findings.

Figure 2

(A, B): Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT reveals infarctions in the spleen and right kidney (white arrows). (C): Transthoracic echocardiography shows two threadlike to bandlike vegetations exceeding 30 mm attached to the anterior mitral leaflet (red arrows).

Blood culture was positive for Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).

The patient was diagnosed with sepsis, infective endocarditis, systemic embolism, and meningitis, likely originating from dental caries. Initial treatment included vancomycin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, acyclovir, and dexamethasone. On day 4, mitral valve repair was performed to prevent further embolization, and MSSA was again isolated from the vegetation. Antibiotic therapy was subsequently adjusted to cefazolin on day 8, later changed to meropenem on day 47, and oral cephalexin on day 102. Anticoagulation therapy with aspirin and warfarin was initiated to reduce the risk of further embolization.

The patient’s level of consciousness improved to a GCS score of 14. However, due to the presence of aphasia and right hemispatial neglect, the patient was kept hospitalized for rehabilitation purposes. On day 44, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) detected a newly developed unruptured cerebral aneurysm in the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Post-mitral valve repair head MRI/MRA.

Figure 3

(A) FLAIR image; (B) T2-weighted image; and (C) MRA. Chronic cerebral infarcts are observed, along with an aneurysm in the left middle cerebral artery (arrow).

MRA: Magnetic Resonance Angiography; FLAIR: Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery image.

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) characterized the aneurysm as having a neck measuring 1.5 mm, a long axis of 5.4 mm, and a short axis of 3.8 mm, consistent with an infectious aneurysm (Figure 4A).

Figure 4. Coil embolization for the cerebral aneurysm.

Figure 4

(A) Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) reveals an aneurysm with a maximum diameter of 5.4 mm in the M2-3 segment of the left middle cerebral artery. (B) Microcatheter placement within the aneurysm. (C) Post-coil embolization, no visualization of the aneurysm is evident.

To prevent aneurysm rupture, endovascular coil embolization was performed on day 60. Under general anesthesia, an 8-Fr balloon guiding catheter (Optimo; Tokai Medical Products, Aichi, Japan) was positioned in the left internal carotid artery. Using a distal access catheter (Tactics; Technocrat Corporation, Aichi, Japan), a microcatheter (Headway DUO; Terumo Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and a microguidewire (Synchro SELECT Soft; Stryker, Fremont, CA, USA), the aneurysm was accessed (Figure 4B). Coiling was initiated with a Target 360 Ultra (3 mm × 10 cm; Stryker) to establish a frame, followed by three additional coils (Hyper Soft 3D and i-ED COIL Complex Infini; Terumo and Kaneka Medix, Osaka, Japan), achieving complete aneurysm occlusion (Figure 4C).

Postoperative MRI revealed no new cerebral infarctions (Figures 5A-5B), and MRA confirmed the absence of residual blood flow within the aneurysm (Figure 5C).

Figure 5. Post-coil embolization head MRI/MRA.

Figure 5

(A) FLAIR image and (B) T2-weighted image reveal no new cerebral infarcts. (C) MRA confirms the complete obliteration of the aneurysm.

MRA: Magnetic Resonance Angiography; FLAIR: Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery image.

After completing a rehabilitation program, the patient was discharged on day 110 with a modified Rankin Scale score of 2. At an 18-month follow-up, no recurrence of the aneurysm was detected.

Discussion

IIAs are relatively rare, accounting for 0.5-6.5% of all intracranial aneurysms [4, 12-14]. The precise mechanism underlying the spread of infection sources is uncertain but is thought to involve three possible pathways: endovascular, extravascular, and cryptogenic. The most common route is the endovascular pathway, where septic emboli originating from infected valve cusps in IE lead to IIAs of distal arteries [15-17]. The extravascular route involves direct spread from adjacent infected tissues, such as meningitis, cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis, orbital cellulitis, or post-neurosurgical infections, and typically affects proximal vessels passing through the infected area [15-17]. In the cryptogenic route, the mechanism is unknown and no systemic infection is evident [4, 6]. The MCA is the most frequently affected site, with 56.9% of cases. The morphology of IIAs is often fusiform, followed by saccular. Most IIAs are small to medium in size, with 44.2% measuring less than 5 mm, 30.8% between 5 and 10 mm, and 25.0% exceeding 10 mm, but their size can increase rapidly, up to several centimeters [4]. IE is the most common underlying cause of IIAs, accounting for approximately 70% of cases. The primary causative organisms are Viridans Streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus [4, 6, 14]. Although IIAs are reported in 2-10% of patients with IE, this prevalence may be underestimated due to spontaneous resolution or shrinkage following antibiotic treatment. Given this high prevalence and rapid, unpredictable progression, many literatures recommend routine screening for IIAs in IE patients, particularly within the first five weeks after symptom onset, as this is the period of highest risk for IIA formation and rupture [4, 18]. DSA is considered the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting IIAs, particularly small lesions, but its invasive nature limits its utility in critically ill patients. Although MRA and CTA cannot serve as perfect replacements, they are less invasive alternatives [4, 19].

In this case, the aneurysm was located in the artery responsible for the cerebral embolism and was not identified during the initial vascular screening. The patient might have undergone cardiac surgery while the aneurysm was likely forming. This underscores the importance of serial imaging evaluations in IE patients, as aneurysms may develop or enlarge after initial imaging, necessitating repeated assessments before any surgical intervention.

Currently, no randomized controlled trials or clear guidelines exist for the management of IIAs [4, 13].

Treatment options include antibiotic therapy, surgical intervention, and endovascular treatment (EVT). Alawieh AM et al.'s systematic review proposed treatment strategies based on factors such as rupture status, the necessity for cardiac surgery, patient surgical tolerance, the presence of hematomas causing mass effects, and the need for bypass surgery [4]. For unruptured IIAs, conservative therapy has traditionally been the treatment of choice [6]. However, mortality rates with antibiotic management alone remain significant, reported at 17.1% for unruptured IIAs and 25.8% for ruptured IIAs. In contrast, early surgical intervention is associated with substantially lower mortality rates, reported at 0% for unruptured IIAs and 6% for ruptured IIAs, highlighting the need for early surgical or endovascular intervention [13].

In recent years, EVT has gained prominence due to favorable outcomes, especially in patients with poor cardiac function or in cases involving distal aneurysms that are challenging to access surgically [18]. Endovascular procedures include coil embolization and parent artery occlusion (PAO) using coils or liquid embolic agents [6]. While PAO achieves higher aneurysm occlusion rates, it carries significant risks, including ischemic stroke and complications related to catheter removal or vessel injury [14]. Coil embolization is effective for obliterating the aneurysm sac while preserving the parent artery, but it comes with risks such as rupture during coil placement due to the distally located IIAs and the fragile vessel wall of the parent artery, coil compaction, and recanalization [8].

Concerns regarding the introduction of foreign objects into an infected site, potentially exacerbating infection or causing abscess formation, have not been proven. No documented cases of infectious complications or brain abscesses related to EVT in infective endocarditis (IE)-associated IIAs have been reported [20-22]. It has been suggested that septic emboli predominantly occur in the acute phase, whereas IIAs develop during the subacute phase when the patient is generally aseptic at the time of detection [23].

In this case, the patient required anticoagulation therapy following mitral valve repair and presented with a saccular aneurysm without mass effect. Considering these factors, coil embolization was chosen. To mitigate the risk of device-related infections, intravenous antibiotics were administered for two months preoperatively. The procedure successfully obliterated the aneurysm while preserving the parent artery, with no subsequent ischemic events or recurrence observed.

To our knowledge, including the present case, a total of 16 cases (involving 18 aneurysms) of unruptured IIAs treated with coil have been reported across 11 studies [15, 19, 22-30] (Table 2).

Table 2. Summary of coil embolization for unruptured infectious cerebral aneurysms.

NA: Not available; IE: Infective endocarditis; MCA: Middle cerebral artery; ACA: Anterior cerebral artery; PCA: Posterior cerebral artery; EVT: Endovascular treatment; NBCA: N-butyl cyanoacrylate; BOT: Balloon occlusion test; GOS: Glasgow Outcome Scale; mRS: Modified Rankin Scale.

*The age was not reported; the value of n=4 refers to four patients included in the analysis whose ages were unspecified.

Author (year) Age Sex Presenting Symptoms Imaging findings on admission Etiology (Organism) Aneurysm Location/Size Aneurysm Type Duration of Antibiotic Treatment Before EVT EVT Complete Obliteration Complication/Outcome
Asai T, et al. (2002) [29] 21 M Hemiparesis, dysarthria CI with right MCA occlusion IE (Streptococcus uberis) Left distal MCA (M3) NA 6 weeks Trapping (Coil with NBCA) Yes No / Hemiplegia was improved
Chapot R, et al. (2002) [24] 55 M NA SAH with left distal MCA IE (Streptococcus uberis) Right proximal MCA Saccular 10 weeks Selective Yes No/ Normal
Nakahara I, et al. (2006) [25] 56 M Low grade fever Unruptured right PCA aneurysm IE (Streptococcus oralis) 1: Right distal PCA/ 9.2 mm 2: left distal ACA/ 5.7 mm NA NA 1: 3+ weeks 2: 6+ weeks 1: Selective 2: Trappping Yes No/ No neurologic deficit
Wajnberg E, et al. (2008) [26] 39 M CN III palsy NA IE BA Tip NA NA Selective Yes No/ GOS 5
Martindale JL, et al. (2011) [27] 33 F Fever, right arm numbness, confusion CI with left MCA aneurysm IE (Streptococcus sanguinis) Left distal MCA (M3)/ 4 mm Fusiform 3+ days Selective Yes No/ Mild right hand paresthesias
Lv N, et al. (2016) [28] 45 M Headache NA IE 1: Left distal MCA (M3)/ 5.0 mm 2: Left distal MCA (M4)/ 7.8 mm NA NA NA Yes No/ Good 
Matsubara N, et al. (2015) [23] 27 F Mass effect NA Sepsis (Enterococcus) ICA cavernous/ 15 mm Fusiform NA Trapping Yes No/ mRS 1
Matsubara N, et al. (2015) [23] 51 F Mass effect NA Meningitis (Streptococcus) ICA cavernous 5.5 mm Saccular NA Selective Yes No/ mRS 0
Esenkaya A, et al. (2016) [15] 40 M NA CI in deep parietal lobe IE Left MCA (M2-M3)/ 8 mm Saccular NA Selective Yes No/ mRS 0
Nonaka S, et al. (2016) [19] 47 M Hemianopia CI with left PCA aneurysm IE (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) Right distal PCA (P3-4)/ 10×8 mm Saccular NA Trapping after BOT Yes No/ mRS 0
Ando K, et al. (2019) [30] 43 M Sudden headache, sensory aphasia Partially thrombosed aneurysm IE (Enterococcus faecalis) Left proximal MCA/ 50mm Fusiform NA Trapping with revascularization Yes No/ mRS 3
Lai PM, et al. (2022) [22] n= 4※ NA NA NA IE NA NA NA Selective Yes NA/ NA
Present case 54 M Fever, impaired consciousness CI IE (Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) Left MCA (M2-M3)/ 5.4× 3.8 mm Saccular 8 weeks Selective Yes No/ mRS2

The mean age at diagnosis was 43 years (median 44; range 21-56 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1 (data unavailable for four cases). The most common etiology was IE (14 cases), with sepsis and meningitis accounting for one case each. The middle cerebral artery (MCA) was the most frequently affected location (6 cases), followed by the posterior cerebral artery (2 cases), basilar artery (1 case), and cavernous internal carotid artery (2 cases). The mean aneurysm size was 11.4 mm (median 7.8 mm; range 4-50 mm; data unavailable for seven cases). Saccular morphology was observed in 5 cases, fusiform in 3 cases, and unspecified in 10 cases. The interval between antibiotic initiation and EVT ranged from 3 days to 10 weeks (data unavailable for 11 cases); in one case it was three days, but in the rest it was three weeks or more. Coil embolization was performed in 11 aneurysms, and PAO in five cases. All cases demonstrated favorable outcomes without complications. Notably, small aneurysms (<10 mm) were more likely to be treated with coil embolization.

Based on the existing literature, coil embolization is a viable management option for unruptured IIAs smaller than 10 mm, provided the patient has undergone at least three weeks of adequate antibiotic therapy. This approach minimizes the risk of procedural complications while effectively managing the aneurysm, offering a balance between efficacy and safety.

This study has several limitations. First, the small sample size limits comprehensive statistical analyses. Second, incomplete information in reported cases restricts detailed evaluation of factors influencing treatment outcomes and complications. Third, reporting bias inherent to literature reviews cannot be excluded. To address these limitations, future prospective studies or multicenter collaborative research with larger sample sizes are required to establish optimal treatment strategies for unruptured IIAs.

Conclusions

In this case report, EVT with coil embolization was successfully performed for an IIA associated with IE, while preserving the parent artery, resulting in a favorable clinical outcome. Several factors likely contributed to this success, including the small size of the aneurysm (<10 mm), its saccular morphology, and its accessible location. Additionally, the administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy both before and after the procedure was critical in minimizing infection-related complications. This case highlights the importance of a tailored treatment strategy for individual patients.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Tatsuya Tanaka, Anh Tran Hue, Hiroshi Itokawa, Kimihiro Nakahara, Akira Matsuno

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Tatsuya Tanaka, Anh Tran Hue, Fumitaka Yamane

Drafting of the manuscript:  Tatsuya Tanaka, Anh Tran Hue

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Tatsuya Tanaka, Anh Tran Hue, Fumitaka Yamane, Hiroshi Itokawa, Kimihiro Nakahara, Akira Matsuno

Supervision:  Akira Matsuno

References

  • 1.National treatment practices in the management of infectious intracranial aneurysms and infective endocarditis. Singla A, Fargen K, Blackburn S, et al. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:741–746. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Effect of early cerebral magnetic resonance imaging on clinical decisions in infective endocarditis: a prospective study. Duval X, Iung B, Klein I, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:497–504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Epidemiology and risk factors of mycotic aneurysm in patients with infective endocarditis and the impact of its rupture in outcomes. Analysis of a National Prospective Cohort. Calderón-Parra J, Domínguez F, González-Rico C, et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11:0. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Management and long-term outcomes of patients with infectious intracranial aneurysms. Alawieh AM, Dimisko L, Newman S, et al. Neurosurgery. 2023;92:515–523. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Intracranial microbial aneurysm (infectious aneurysm): current options for diagnosis and management. Kannoth S, Thomas SV. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:120–129. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9208-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clinical course of infectious intracranial aneurysm undergoing antibiotic treatment. Rice CJ, Cho SM, Marquardt RJ, et al. J Neurol Sci. 2019;403:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Endovascular treatment of cerebral mycotic aneurysm: a review of the literature and single center experience. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, et al. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:151643. doi: 10.1155/2013/151643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parent artery occlusion for posterior cerebral artery aneurysms. Hoya K, Nagaishi M, Yoshimoto Y, Morikawa E, Takahashi H. Interv Neuroradiol. 2006;12:125–128. doi: 10.1177/15910199060120S120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Endovascular treatment of posterior cerebral artery aneurysms: a single center's experience of 55 cases. Qin X, Xu F, Maimaiti Y, Zheng Y, Xu B, Leng B, Chen G. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:1094–1105. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Endovascular treatment of intracranial infectious aneurysms in eloquent cortex with super-selective provocative testing: case series and literature review. Fusco MR, Stapleton CJ, Griessenauer CJ, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22:148–152. doi: 10.1177/1591019915617326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Infectious intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review of epidemiology, management, and outcomes. Alawieh A, Chaudry MI, Turner RD, Turk AS, Spiotta AM. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:708–716. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.When the heart rules the head: ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage complicating infective endocarditis. Jiad E, Gill SK, Krutikov M, Turner D, Parkinson MH, Curtis C, Werring DJ. Pract Neurol. 2017;17:28–34. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2016-001469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Initial treatment strategy for intracranial mycotic aneurysms: 2 case reports and literature review. Ohtake M, Tateishi K, Ikegaya N, Iwata J, Yamanaka S, Murata H. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:1051. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Erratum to evaluating the safety and efficacy of various endovascular approaches for the treatment of infectious intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Desai B, Soldozy S, Desai H, Kumar J, Shah S, Raper DM, Park MS. World Neurosurg. 2020;144:293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Endovascular treatment of intracranial infectious aneurysms. Esenkaya A, Duzgun F, Cinar C, Bozkaya H, Eraslan C, Ozgiray E, Oran I. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:277–284. doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1633-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.JCS 2017 Guideline on Prevention and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis. Nakatani S, Ohara T, Ashihara K, et al. Circ J. 2019;83:1767–1809. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Septic cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to sinusitis: are anticoagulants indicated? A review of the literature. Bhatia K, Jones NS. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116:667–676. doi: 10.1258/002221502760237920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for intracranial infectious aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Petr O, Brinjikji W, Burrows AM, Cloft H, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G. J Neuroradiol. 2016;43:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2016.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Endovascular therapy for infectious intracranial aneurysm: a report of four cases. Nonaka S, Oishi H, Tsutsumi S, et al. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:0. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Endovascular treatment for bilateral mycotic intracavernous carotid aneurysms. Case report and review of the literature. Yen PS, Teo BT, Chen SC, Chiu TL. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:868–872. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/10/0868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stent-assisted coil embolization of a mycotic renal artery aneurysm by use of a self-expanding neurointerventional stent. Rabellino M, García-Nielsen L, Zander T, Baldi S, Llorens R, Maynar M. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34:0. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9971-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Safety profile and factors associated with good outcome for endovascularly treated infectious intracranial aneurysms. Lai PM, Caragher S, Patel NJ, Du R, Ali Aziz-Sultan M. Neurosurgery. 2022;90:233–239. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Results and current trends of multimodality treatment for infectious intracranial aneurysms. Matsubara N, Miyachi S, Izumi T, Yamanouchi T, Asai T, Ota K, Wakabayashi T. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015;55:155–162. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Endovascular treatment of cerebral mycotic aneurysms. Chapot R, Houdart E, Saint-Maurice JP, Aymard A, Mounayer C, Lot G, Merland JJ. Radiology. 2002;222:389–396. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2222010432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Different modalities of treatment of intracranial mycotic aneurysms: report of 4 cases. Nakahara I, Taha MM, Higashi T, et al. Surg Neurol. 2006;66:405–409. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Endovascular treatment for intracranial infectious aneurysms. Wajnberg E, Rueda F, Marchiori E, Gasparetto EL. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008;66:790–794. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000600002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Neurologic complaints in a patient with infective endocarditis. Martindale JL, Hayden EM. J Emerg Med. 2012;43:0. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Endovascular treatment of distal middle cerebral artery aneurysms: report of eight cases and literature review. Lv N, Zhou Y, Yang P, et al. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22:12–17. doi: 10.1177/1591019915617317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Endovascular treatment for intracranial mycotic aneurysms prior to cardiac surgery. Asai T, Usui A, Miyachi S, Ueda Y. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:948–950. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Treatment strategies for infectious intracranial aneurysms: report of three cases and review of the literature. Ando K, Hasegawa H, Kikuchi B, Saito S, On J, Shibuya K, Fujii Y. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019;59:344–350. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES