Skip to main content
Theranostics logoLink to Theranostics
. 2025 Jan 2;15(5):1760–1786. doi: 10.7150/thno.104944

Stimulus-responsive smart bioactive glass composites for repair of complex tissue defects

Yulian Yang 1,#, Yonghao Qiu 1,#, Cai Lin 2, Xiaofeng Chen 3,4,✉, Fujian Zhao 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11780539  PMID: 39897548

Abstract

Smart biomaterials with active environmental responsiveness have attracted widespread attention in recent years. Previous studies on bioactive glass (BG) have mainly focused on the property of bioactivity, while little attention has been paid to the property of smart response of BG. Herein, we propose the concept of Smart Bioactive Glass Composites (SBGC) which are capable of actively responding to the endogenous disease microenvironment or exogenous physical stimuli, thereby enabling active treatment of tissue defect sites and ultimately promoting tissue regeneration. In this review, the response characteristics of SBGC to different internal and external environments are described. Subsequently, the applications of SBGC in complex tissue defect repair of tumors, infections, and diabetes are reviewed. By deeply analyzing the recent progress of SBGC in different fields, this review will point out the direction for the research of next-generation BG.

Keywords: Smart, Bioactive glass, Stimulus-response, Complex tissue defect repair, Microenvironment

Introduction

Bioactive glass (BG) is a typical bioactive material that promotes tissue regeneration and repair by activating gene expression through the dissolution of bioactive ions. Due to its excellent biological activity, BG has been widely used in the repair of tissue defects, such as bone, skin and teeth. However, when tissue defects are combined with other diseases (e.g., refractory infections, tumors), the repair effect of BG is not ideal as it can only provide a basic therapeutic effect.

In recent years, smart repair materials that actively respond to the environment have become a hot research topic. Smart bioactive glass composites (SBGC) with smart properties have also been reported in various fields. It has been attempted for the treatment of complex diseases such as tissue defects combined with tumors, infectious diseases, acute bleeding, diabetes, and its complications. SBGC is mainly characterized by its ability to actively respond to the endogenous disease microenvironment (e.g., pH, reactive oxygen species, specific enzymes, etc.) and exogenous physical stimuli (e.g., magnetic field, light, electrical stimulation, etc.), thus enabling active treatment of the lesion and promoting tissue regeneration. This targeted responsiveness allows the SBGC to meet different treatment needs effectively, providing more precise control and customized treatment options. In addition, compared with other smart biomaterials, SBGC has specific advantages including bioactive ion dissolution, gene activation, and mineralization properties. Some summaries of BG research progress have been reported with the deepening of research. However, previous reviews on BG have mostly focused on its preparation method1, therapeutic effects2,3, molecular mechanisms4, and translational applications5. Studies related to the use of SBGC for complex tissue repair have not yet been summarized.

Therefore, this review will provide an overview of the response types of SBGC in various internal and external environments, as well as their applications in multiple fields. At the same time, the current situation of SBGC is analyzed and their future development is predicted (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of classification of SBGC and application in complex tissue defect repair.

Synthesis method of SBGC

The preparation of SBGC is to add ions, drugs and compounds with smart response functions to the BG composite material. According to the location of the smart response function about the BG particles, it can be divided into the inside, the surface, and the outside of the BG particle.

SBGCs with smart response points located inside the BG particles were mainly prepared by ion doping. The -Si-O- network structure of BG allows the internal incorporation of various ions during the sol-gel synthesis process6. This capability has led to the development of various ion-doped BGs that exhibit intelligent response properties. Recently reported dopant ions include manganese, cerium, and bismuth, among others, conferring a smart response to the BG7-9. This controlled degradation facilitates sustained and effective stimulus responses, enhancing the material's suitability for therapeutic applications that require continuous ion release.

SBGCs with smart response points on the BG surface were mainly constructed by physical adsorption and chemical grafting. Electrostatic attraction is a common method for loading smart response points by physical adsorption. Mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBG) with very high specific surface area are often used as carriers for therapeutic ions. The mesopore structure is an advantage of the template method of preparing BG which can modulate the mesopore size by controlling the experimental conditions10. Due to the abundance of negatively charged silicon hydroxyl groups on the BG surface, positively charged drugs and ions can easily bind to the BG surface by electrostatic attraction11-14. In addition, smart response functional groups can also be chemically grafted onto the surface of BGs, including peptides, enzymes, etc.15-17. It is also possible to graft functional groups with high drug loading efficiency onto the surface of BG, and then graft smart responsive drugs to improve stability. For example, amino-functionalized MBG are positively charged and help to load more negatively charged drugs18.

SBGCs with smart response points outside the BG mainly form composite materials by combining them with other polymers such as collagen, sodium alginate, chitosan, ethylene glycol, and so on19,20. Smart response components can be polymers or drugs loaded into polymers. Based on the advantages of excellent suspension and uniform particle size, BG particles can be evenly mixed with organic polymers to produce electrostatic films, injectable hydrogels, 3D printing scaffolds, etc.21-23.

Internal microenvironment-responsive SBGC

The internal microenvironment refers to the environment surrounding a cell in the body, including the chemical, physical, and mechanical conditions in which it is located and other cells and the extracellular matrix adjacent to it. The microenvironment influences the biological behavior of cells, such as their migration, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis24-27. Under disease conditions, some physicochemical parameters in the microenvironment, such as pH, reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentration, and temperature, undergo specific changes28-31. The SBGC specifically responds to changes in these parameters of the microenvironment and provides appropriate feedback, such as structural changes and drug release, leading to targeted treatment of diseases.

pH-responsive SBGC

In disease states such as infections and tumors, high levels of cellular glycolysis and lactic acid accumulation cause a decrease in the pH of the microenvironment at the site of the lesion32-35. The SBGC responds to this acidic environment by releasing therapeutic drugs, achieving disease treatment, and promoting tissue regeneration. Physical adsorption and chemical grafting are common methods for constructing pH-responsive SBGC.

Physical adsorption combines pH-sensitive components with the porous structure of mesoporous bioactive glass. For example, ZnO quantum dots (ZnO QDs) are often used as "gatekeepers" for mesoporous structures because of their unique acid responsiveness36,37. ZnO QDs, which coat the pore structure of MBG through simple electrostatic interactions, remain stable at pH 7.4 but immediately dissolve into zinc ions at pH values less than 5.538. At this point, the loaded drug is released to achieve specific treatment of the lesion. Another study took full advantage of the biological activity of BG to spontaneously mineralize through physical sedimentation, forming a hydroxyapatite (HAP) coating in the drug-carrying MBG pores, thereby limiting drug release. The gradual degradation of HAP in acidic environments and an ingenious realization of the pH response could then be utilized to control drug release39. In addition to the use of acid-sensitive materials to encapsulate drugs within MBG, some drugs themselves can be physically adsorbed onto the MBG surface40. For example, the amino groups in the antitumor drug doxorubicin (DOX) are readily protonated in acidic media to become positively charged NH3+, which allows DOX to desorb from the MBG surface by electrostatic effects41. Thus, DOX-loaded MBG has pH-sensitive drug release capabilities. In addition, the drug chelates with Ca2+ on the MBG and is released when Ca2+ is released from the MBG nanospheres. The ionic dissolution characteristics of BG provide a new idea for the design of pH-responsive SBGC42. The construction of a pH-responsive SBGC system by physical adsorption is a relatively simple method. However, considering the complex and changeable cellular microenvironment, its stability must be further studied.

In addition to physical methods, chemical grafting is also an effective method for constructing pH-responsive SBGC. Chemical grafting introduces acid-sensitive functional groups onto the MBG surface. Various anhydrides and polypeptides are common acid-sensitive functional groups. Under acidic conditions, the covalent bonds of these functional groups are broken for the controlled release of therapeutic drugs43-45. For example, poly-L-glutamic acid (PLGA) is a synthetic peptide that has been extensively studied for its pH response due to its modifiable carboxyl side groups46,47. Amino-silane-functionalized MBG is covalently linked to PLGA via an amide bond to construct a pH-responsive SBGC for the delivery of daunorubicin. At a pH value of approximately 5.5, daunorubicin is significantly released48.

However, tissue regeneration is a dynamic process. For example, the initial local environment of a fracture hematoma is acidic, gradually becoming neutral and eventually alkaline as healing progresses49. Therefore, real-time monitoring of pH at the lesion site helps to provide timely feedback on disease status. Aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens) have attracted much attention because of their high luminous intensity in the aggregation state50. AIEgens are attached to MBG by post-grafting. The emission wavelength of the SBGC reversibly changes with changing pH, which is used as an effective fluorescent probe for cell imaging. Moreover, SBGC, which has high drug loading efficiency, enables sustained, pH-responsive drug release51,52. In addition, the SBGC should be able to implement sequential responses based on changes in pH. In an acidic environment, one therapeutic drug is released to reduce the inflammatory response and treat the associated disease, whereas, in an alkaline environment, another drug is released to promote tissue repair. This dual drug delivery strategy enables precise drug release in different disease states and simplifies drug delivery procedures53.

pH-responsive SBGC has a wide range of applications in the field of tissue regeneration. However, MBG generally has high degradability in acidic environments. The release of calcium and phosphorus ions may lead to a sudden increase in local pH, which is not conducive to the precise release of drugs and may cause damage to normal cells54,55. To solve this problem measures such as changing the structure, composition, or assembly method of SBGC can be taken to adjust its solubility, thereby reducing drastic changes in pH. In addition, future research directions can focus on the development of systems for the timely monitoring of pH changes and drug release in the application area.

ROS-responsive SBGC

ROS are highly active oxygen compounds produced by cell metabolism. By mediating redox signaling, ROS maintain the intracellular redox state and regulate cellular function56. However, in the disease state, an imbalance in redox homeostasis leads to the overproduction of ROS, which leads to oxidative stress and ultimately induces inflammation and pathological responses57,58. SBGC utilizes polyphenols and antioxidant metal ions to relieve oxidative stress in response to excess ROS at the lesion site.

First, the grafting of polyphenols is a method to implement SBGC responses to ROS. Polyphenols have complex polyphenol structures, including benzene rings, hydroxyl groups, aldehyde groups, and other functional groups. These functional groups react with free radicals and exhibit antioxidant activity59,60. However, these chemical structures also mean that polyphenols are unstable and easily degraded, causing them to lose their antioxidant activity61. Polyphenols conjugated to BG improve their molecular stability and bioavailability to a certain extent62,63. For example, polytannic acid (PTA) and ε-polylysine (ε-PL) functionalize BG through layer-upon-layer assembly. The coordination interactions between the calcium ions in BG and PTA result in stable covalent bonds (Fig. 2A). The active hydroxyl group of PTA responds to high levels of ROS by donating hydrogen atoms to free radicals64,65.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ROS-responsive SBGC: (A) Description of the synthesis route of multi-layer BGN@PTA nanosystems. Adapted with permission from 65, copyright 2023 Elsevier. (B) Antioxidative mechanism diagram of Ce-BG. Adapted with permission from 66, copyright 2024 Elsevier. (C) Instructions for the preparation of injectable organic/inorganic composite CSP@BG-microsphere systems. Adapted with permission from 69, copyright 2023 Elsevier. (D) Synthesis and structural analysis of B-M with multifunctional activity. Adapted with permission from 71, copyright 2021 ACS publications.

Second, SBGC doped with various valence ions also actively responds to ROS. Cerium(Ce)-doped SBGC responds to and quenches ROS via a transition of oxidation states between Ce4+ and Ce3+(Fig. 2B)66. Notably, the ratio of Ce3+/Ce4+ affected the type of ROS catalysis. High Ce3+/Ce4+ ratios resulted in significant superoxide dismutase mimetic activity, whereas low Ce3+/Ce4+ ratios resulted in significant catalase (CAT) mimetic activity67,68. Therefore, the ratio of Ce3+/Ce4+ in the SBGC can be adjusted as needed. In further studies, injectable SBGC microspheres were developed by combining Ce-BG with chitosan (CS) using water-in-oil emulsification. The phenylboric acid group of CS endows SBGC with excellent tissue adhesion properties, whereas Ce-BG responds to and scavenges various reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ⋅OH, effectively alleviating oxidative stress (Fig. 2C)69. In addition to Ce, molybdenum (Mo) species, mainly Mo6+ and Mo4+ are also typical variable valence elements70. Mo4+ and Mo6+ can be added to the BG network using a hydrothermal-assisted classical synthesis method. This SBGC structure has many free electrons and oxygen vacancies, which are the main factors in the response to ROS. In addition, the stabilized free electron and oxygen vacancies endow SBGC with long-term effective antioxidant activity and photothermal properties (Fig. 2D)71.

To obtain SBGC with better ROS responsiveness, simultaneous loading of Ce and polyphenols has also been investigated72. Notably, however, moderate levels of ROS play a key role in regulating cellular metabolism and the stress response, which is conducive to maintaining cell and tissue health73. Current research on ROS-responsive SBGC focuses on how to maximize the response to and scavenging of ROS; however, the monitoring and regulation of ROS levels are still lacking. Therefore, it is possible to design an SBGC capable of maintaining stability over a specific range of ROS concentrations, which implies a more sensitive response of SBGC to ROS.

Temperature-responsive SBGC

The normal body temperature is usually between 36.5 °C and 37.5 °C. Within this temperature range, the physiological functions of the body can function normally74. The temperature-responsive SBGC uses human body temperature to trigger response behavior. When the SBGC experiences a change from ambient temperature to the physiological temperature of the human body, its shape and structure change.

The combination of BG and a temperature-sensitive hydrogel is a common method to construct a temperature-responsive SBGC. A temperature-responsive SBGC has the advantages of being injectable and undergoing a sol-gel transition at body temperature to form a stable structure75. Based on the source of raw materials, hydrogels are categorized into synthetic hydrogels and natural hydrogels. The p(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-butyl methylacrylate) (PIB) nanogels are synthetic crosslinked polymers. The dispersions show three phase states at different temperatures, including expansive gel, mobile sol, and shrink gel. For example, boron-containing MBG in combination with a PIB nanogel forms a temperature-responsive SBGC that undergoes rapid thermal gelation at body temperature and is suitable for the repair of irregularly shaped bone defects76.

In addition, hydrogels obtained by physical cross-linking of natural polysaccharides also respond to temperature77. The SBGC constructed with a combination of Cu-BG and CS/silk fibroin/sodium glycerophosphate hydrogels is capable of in situ gel formation triggered by body temperature and shows sustained and controlled release of Si, Ca, and Cu ions78,79. A similar study combined CS and gelatin polymers with BG nanoparticles to synthesize novel in situ-formed SBGC hydrogels. The incorporation of gelatin and BG significantly improved the elastic properties of SBGC and effectively shortened the gelation time80.

Fever has long been considered one of the indicators of the acute phase of infection or injury81,82. Current research on temperature-responsive SBGC has focused on the physical conformational changes that occur in hydrogels from room temperature to body temperature. However, this approach does not allow for a more precise and flexible temperature response. Responding to subtle changes in body temperature during disease states may be an interesting research direction for temperature-responsive SBGC.

Enzyme-responsive SBGC

Enzyme-responsive SBGC utilizes specific binding between the enzyme and the substrate83. The SBGC carries substrates that respond to enzymes that are abnormally expressed at the lesion site, triggering a catalytic reaction. As the substrate is consumed, the SBGC undergoes structural changes in which the encapsulated drug is released.

Enzyme-responsive SBGC is constructed by grafting an enzyme substrate onto MBG. The substrate acts as a molecular gate covering the mesoporous structure of MBG. When the enzyme whose expression is abnormally high at the lesion site reacts with the substrate, the molecular gate unblocks the mesoporous structure. For example, the high-energy phosphate compound adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a commonly used energy carrier in cells and is used as a substrate for building an SBGC against acid phosphatase (ACP), which is highly expressed at sites of bone infection. ATP forms covalent bonds with triamines on the outer surface of MBG to cover the pores and inhibit the release of antibiotics. The increased ACP at the infected bone tissue site causes hydrolysis of the phosphate bond of ATP, opening the entrance of the SBGC mesopore and releasing antibiotics84. In similar studies, high levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the serum of patients with osteosarcoma have been used as a target for an enzyme-responsive SBGC. ε-PL was shown to function as a molecular gate closure functionalized for MBG to enable targeted drug release at tumor sites in the presence of ALP85.

Enzyme-responsive SBGC is a less-studied area that needs to be further explored. Currently, the most common therapies for the enzyme response include self-assembly of peptides with enzyme cleavage sequences or covalent attachment of protease-sensitive peptides to biomaterials86,87. However, these methods have not been applied to construct an enzyme-responsive SBGC. In addition, some enzymes are distributed in multiple cells, such as glucokinase, which is widely distributed in the cytoplasm88. Nonspecific catalytic reactions inevitably lead to unintended side effects. In this case, membrane camouflage can provide a solution89. Membrane-camouflaged SBGC selectively enters specific cells to catalyze reactions with intracellular enzymes, which may be an interesting research direction.

In brief, we have summarized how SBGCs specifically respond to pH, ROS, temperature, and enzymes in the pathological microenvironment, providing new insights into the complex interactions between biomaterials and their cellular environment (Table 1). The cellular microenvironment is a complex, dynamic, three-dimensional environment. SBGCs modulate the cellular microenvironment and modulate its structure or function in response to changes in physical or chemical parameters surrounding the cell. At present, these types of SBGC are still in the preliminary stage of research, and further investigation is needed to optimize their composition and structure, as well as their interaction mechanisms with the cell surface. This includes how SBGCs affect key biological processes, such as cell signaling, gene expression, and the cell cycle, and precisely regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and function. In addition, other parameters in the disease microenvironment, such as potential and ion concentrations, are worthy of further study.

Table 1.

Internal microenvironment responsive SBGC

Response type of the SBGC Functional component How to respond Ref.
pH-responsive ZnO QDs ZnO QDs are released rapidly at pH 4.0. 38
HAP MBG spontaneously mineralizes to form HAP, rapidly degrading at pH = 4.0. 39
DOX DOX desorption from MBG at pH = 4.3.
Ca2+ chelated DOX is released as Ca2+ dissolves from MBG at pH = 4.0.
41
42
PLGA At pH ~ 5.5, the PLGA covalent bond is broken. 48
AIEgens The emission wavelength changes reversibly with pH from 2.0 to 4.0. 51,52
ROS-responsive SBGC Gallic acid
PTA
Reactive hydroxyl groups of polyphenols donate hydrogen atoms to free radicals to neutralize free radical activity 62,63
65
Ce Redox reaction
Redox reaction
66-69
Mo 71
Temperature-responsive SBGC PIB
CS
It changes from liquid to gel at body temperature.
It changes from liquid to gel at body temperature.
76
78-80
Enzyme-responsive SBGC ATP
ε-PL
The increased ACP causes hydrolysis of the phosphate bond of ATP.
ε-PL hydrolysis in the presence of protease.
84
85

External stimulus-responsive SBGC

An exogenous stimulus-responsive SBGC means that external stimuli change the structure, nature, or function of the cell to achieve specific treatment of diseases90-92. Common external stimuli include electric field, light, and magnetic field (Table 2).

Table 2.

Exogenous stimulus-responsive SBGC

Response type of the SBGC Functional component How to respond Ref.
Electrical stimulus-responsive SBGC BG Polarization changes the charge arrangement inside BG 96-98
CNT CNT forms a conductive network in BG 99,100
KNN Piezoelectric effect 102,158,159
PVFT Piezoelectric effect 103
BaTiO3 Piezoelectric effect 104
Magnetic field-responsive SBGC Fe3O4 Magnetocaloric effect 108,110,112,116
MnO2, Fe2O3 Magnetocaloric effect 109
γ-Fe2O3 Magnetocaloric effect 111
α-Fe2O3 Magnetocaloric effect 115
BF Magnetocaloric effect 117
Light-responsive SBGC Fe、Mn、Cu、Mo Photothermal effect caused by SPR 130
Bi Photothermal effect caused by SPR 127,131
Cu Photothermal effect caused by SPR 132
Nb2C Photothermal effect in response to NIR 135
carbon dots Photothermal effect in response to NIR 136
CuFeSe2 Photothermal effect in response to NIR 137
DTC Photothermal effect in response to NIR 140
Hematin Photothermal effect in response to NIR 141
PDA Photothermal effect in response to NIR 118-120]
coumarin UV light (>310 nm) induced photodimerization of coumarin, while UV light (250nm) induced lysis of coumarin dimer and regenerated coumarin monomer 139
Shape memory SBGC PCL-TES The triethoxy-silyl group is hydrolyzed and condensed with the silicon hydroxyl group of BG. 151
chitosan Shape memory properties are triggered by hydration. 152-155
Gelatin-hyaluronic acid hydrogel Shape memory properties are triggered by hydration 156

Electrical stimulus-responsive SBGC

Electrical stimulation (ES) is a physical therapy that promotes tissue healing and functional recovery through external electrical stimulation93. However, ES is not spatially limited and is less effective at repairing deep tissue. An electrical stimulus-responsive SBGC compensates for this shortcoming by responding to external electrical signals and delivering electrical stimulation to the target tissue while promoting tissue repair94,95.

Polarization and incorporation of conductive materials are effective methods for constructing an electrical stimulus-responsive SBGC. First, the polarization of the BG itself is a strategy for building a stimulus-responsive SBGC. High temperatures and voltages are applied to the BG to create a permanent electric dipole moment. Due to the migration of sodium ions, a large surface charge is stored in the BG, which changes the internal structure of the BG and results in a certain conductivity96,97. Polarization results in a change in the morphology of the BG silicon-rich layer. When external electrical stimulation is applied, the charge within the BG rearranges, triggering a specific bioactive response that regulates the growth rate of amorphous calcium phosphate and bone apatite98. Second, the BG is combined with highly conductive materials to form a conductive network. For example, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) coated on the surface of a BG scaffold by electrophoretic deposition respond to external electrical stimulation, which has the potential to increase cell viability and differentiation99. In addition, CNTs are used as sensors to monitor the bioactivity level of BG. CNTs form a conductive network in the BG matrix and use current-voltage characteristic changes as markers of biological activity to develop SBGCs with sensing functions100.

Some limitations remain in the process of electrical stimulus-response, such as the need for an external power supply to power and regulate the stimulus conditions of the exogenous electric field. Notably, piezoelectric materials provide a solution for generating charge distribution changes without the need for an external power source101. Piezoelectric materials promote bone regeneration by accumulating electrical charge in response to mechanical stress. For example, potassium sodium niobate (KNN) is a lead-free piezoelectric material. The KNN-doped SBGC (KNN/BG) is prepared via a solid-phase synthesis route. Subsequently, an external electronic device polarizes the KNN/BG to obtain P-KNN/BG, whose regular domain arrangement will help to improve the piezoelectric properties (Fig. 3A). The SBGC responds to mechanical energy to form a stable electrical stimulus that induces hyperpolarization of the cell membrane, increasing the inward flow of active ions into the cell. The enhancement of endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation through the activation of the eNOS/NO signaling pathway facilitates angiogenesis102. In addition, our group developed a biomimetic bioactive piezoelectric SBGC that utilizes piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) (PVFT) to mimic the periosteum and BG micro-nanoparticles to mimic the bone matrix (Fig. 3B). The PVFT gives full play to the electromechanical coupling effect, whereas the BG provides sufficient mineral ions (such as Ca and P) that are essential for bone formation103. However, the amount of BG loading is a factor to be considered. As shown in Fig. 3C, the BG content should be within a moderate range. High concentrations of BG limit the piezoelectric properties, thus eliminating the possibility of an electrical stimulation response104.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Electrical Stimulus-responsive SBGC: (A) Surface potential and ion release profiles of KNN / BG and P - KNN / BG. Adapted with permission from 102, copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH. (B) Preparation and observation of PVFT - BGM composite scaffolds. Adapted with permission from 103, copyright 2020 Elsevier. (C) Influence of BG loading on the basic properties of 3D-printed BaTiO3 / BG composites. Adapted with permission from 104, copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Magnetic field-responsive SBGC

Magnetic materials react in a certain way to an external magnetic field105. By changing their physicochemical properties and structure in response to a magnetic field, a magnetic field-responsive SBGC quickly and controllably achieves magnetothermal effects and the controlled release of therapeutic ingredients.

The magnetic field response capability of an SBGC is realized by introducing a magnetic phase. Iron oxides (such as Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3) are common magnetic phases106,107. BG has controllable magnetothermal properties due to the addition of iron oxide108-110. For example, iron oxide nuclei (γ-Fe2O3) are encapsulated within a BG shell to synthesize superparamagnetic SBGC, which is used as a bone filler material after tumor resection. This SBGC is obtained in two steps: coprecipitation of 16 nm iron oxide nanoparticles followed by growth of a bioactive glass shell layer by a modified Stöber method111. In addition to magnetothermal effects, SBGC also controls ion release in response to magnetic fields. High-porosity magnetic bioactive glass is prepared by the sol-gel method and then combined with calcium sulfate to form the SBGC. This SBGC releases Ca2+ in response to an in vitro magnetic field, leading to calcium overload and death of tumor cells while producing a magnetothermal effect112.

However, the bioactivity of BG decreases with increasing Fe concentration because the Fe content affects the nucleation and growth of apatite on the BG surface113; this may be due to the reaction of Fe in iron oxide with the Si, P, and Ca in the BG to form nonmagnetic phases, such as Fe2(SiO3)3 and FePO4114. To solve this problem, various methods have been adopted. First, a new sol-gel route was developed to prepare a field-responsive SBGC. Heat treatment of iron-doped BG promoted the growth of α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals, which endowed BG with superparamagnetic properties sufficient to generate heat under an applied alternating magnetic field. Moreover, The crystallization did not inhibit the biological activity of BG115. Second, iron oxide was modified with graphite. The chemically stable graphite is adsorbed on the surface of the iron oxide and remains between the iron oxide and the glass matrix, preventing the iron ions from forming a nonmagnetic phase. The SBGC formed by this method has considerable biological activity and a better magnetothermal response116. Finally, the iron oxide is replaced by Ba ferrite (BaFe12O19, BF) to form a magnetic field-response SBGC whose main phases are calcium sodium silicate and barium iron oxide. The magnetic field responsiveness and biological activity increased with increasing BF content117.

In terms of drug delivery, the timed and quantitative release of drugs is achieved by adjusting the intensity and frequency of the external magnetic field. This smart approach compensates for the shortcomings of traditional drug delivery, ensuring that the concentration of the drug in the body remains within the therapeutic range at all times118. No studies have focused on magnetic field-responsive SBGC for the controlled release of smart drugs. In addition, the magnetic field response ability of SBGC is combined with magnetic hyperthermia, chemotherapy, chemodynamic therapy, and other methods to improve the efficacy of tumor treatment119-122.

Light-responsive SBGC

The light response refers to the controlled and reversible change in a smart material after light irradiation123,124. The light response properties of SBGC are achieved by introducing specific light-sensitive components. After specific wavelengths of light are absorbed, certain chemical or physical changes, such as photothermal effects, drug release, and shape changes, occur within or between molecules, exhibiting specific functions125,126. The light-sensitive components introduced in SBGCs mainly include inorganic nanomaterials and organic compounds.

Certain inorganic nanomaterials, most notably metal nanoparticles, have been recognized as excellent reagents for light response, as have carbon-based nanomaterials and semiconductor nanoparticles127. First, the free electrons of the metal nanoparticles interact with the light field to produce the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect, which effectively absorbs and scatters light at specific wavelengths and converts the light energy into thermal energy128,129. Fe-, Mn-, Cu-, Mo-, and Bi-doped SBGCs show photothermal properties, indicating that they can be used for the photothermal treatment of tumors and infections. The final temperature of the SBGCs is controlled by varying the type and content of the doped metal and the laser power density71,130-133. In particular, Bi-doped SBGC effectively controls photothermal effects by quenching luminescence or depolymerizing glass networks127. In addition, nanoparticles modified with peptides can be used as molecular gated systems. The MBG loaded with simvastatin was terminated with gold nanoparticles modified with E7 peptide, and controlled release of simvastatin was achieved after NIR irradiation134. Second, carbon nanomaterials are also light-responsive. Two-dimensional ultrathin niobium carbide MXene nanosheets can be incorporated into 3D-printed BG scaffolds (NBGS) for treating osteosarcoma. NBGS has superior light-responsive properties in the near-infrared-II (NIR-II) biological window, allowing for deeper tissue penetration135. A similar study has incorporated carbon-doped BG nanoparticles into polymer hydrogels as photothermal converters for the delivery of parathyroid hormone. As shown in Fig. 4A, the lower critical dissolution temperature (LCST), as a switch to control drug release, is turned on or off during NIR irradiation136. Finally, Cupr-based chalcogenides, as semiconductors, constitute a new class of highly efficient photothermal reagents. CuFeSe2 nanocrystals are grown in situ on the surfaces of BG scaffolds during the solvothermal reaction. Under 808 nm NIR irradiation, the photothermal response of SBGC scaffolds can be adjusted by changing the CuFeSe2 nanocrystalline content and laser power density137; this provides a way to further develop light-responsive SBGCs. It is well known that BG contains a large amount of silicon, which is an excellent semiconductor material widely used in the manufacture of electronic devices138. Therefore, synthesizing light-responsive BG without relying on photosensitizers might be a challenging research direction.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Light-responsive SBGC: (A) LCST is a switch to control drug release by being turned on or off during NIR irradiation. Adapted with permission from 136, copyright 2023 Elsevier. (B) Characterization and photothermal performance of DTC cocrystal. Adapted with permission from 140, copyright 2020 ResearchGate. (C) PDA-functionalized BG nanoparticles and F127-ε-polylysine formed a hydrogel network via Schiff base reaction. Adapted with permission from 144, copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH.

The SBGC combined with organic compounds also shows light responsiveness. For example, coumarin groups are grafted onto MBG for a light-controlled molecular gate, effectively controlling the light response aperture. UV light (> 310 nm) irradiation induces photodimerization of coumarin to close the pores with cyclobutane dimers. At this point, drug molecules cannot escape from the individual pores of the MBG. However, irradiation with shorter wavelengths of UV light (250 nm) cleaves the coumarin dimer regenerating the coumarin monomer, opening the pore and allowing the drug molecule to be released139. In addition to the use of grafted organic compounds, the cocrystal strategy is also an effective method to impart BG scaffolds with light-responsive properties. A bifunctional SBGC scaffold (DTC@BG) is engineered by the in-situ growth of NIR-absorbing DTC cocrystals on the surface of a 3D-printed BG scaffold. Two small molecules, dibenzotrathiafulvalene as the electron donor and tetracyanobenzene as the electron acceptor are selected to prepare DTC cocrystals, which exhibit excellent photothermal conversion performance due to the intense charge transfer interaction between the acceptor and donor units (Fig. 4B)140. Finally, recent studies have shown that the introduction of substances such as hematin and polydopamine (PDA) into BG scaffolds also enhances their photothermal effects141,142. The light responsiveness of hematin may be derived from the iron ions in its molecular structure. PDA is an efficient photothermal conversion material and has the advantages of strong adhesion, easy preparation, and modification. The abundance of functional groups (e.g., catechol, amines, and imines) in PDA alters the surface properties of the BG143. PDA-functionalized BG is readily attached to other biopolymers by amidation with PDA or Schiff base reactions. As shown in Fig. 4C, PDA-functionalized BG nanoparticles, and F127-ε-polylysine form a hydrogel network via a Schiff base reaction, which exhibits excellent photothermal performance under NIR irradiation144.

In the process of photothermal therapy, the development of an SBGC with temperature monitoring and tissue repair functions is important. In recent years, rare earth ions (e.g., Eu3+ and Nd3+) have been widely used in the fields of bioimaging, biosensing, and self-monitoring therapy due to their excellent luminescence properties145-147. Nd-Ca-Si bioactive glass, which is a new kind of multifunctional smart material with photothermal functions, fluorescence temperature measurements, and bioactivity, is prepared using a containerless processing technique. Due to the linear correlation between fluorescence intensity and temperature, this SBGC is used in photothermal therapy for in situ temperature measurements at tumor sites148. This provides a new possibility for the construction of light-responsive SBGC.

Shape memory SBGC

The most remarkable feature of shape memory materials is their ability to restore their original shape in response to a stimulus, including heat, stress/pressure, current/voltage, magnetic field, pH change, solvent/moisture, and light149,150. Shape memory SBGC combines shape memory characteristics with the BG's biological activity and is perfectly adapted to the size and shape of the tissue site to be regenerated.

The main methods for constructing shape memory SBGC include combining BG with artificial and natural polymers with shape memory functions. For example, electrospun fibers of shape memory triethoxysilane-terminated poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL-TES) loaded with BG are produced. The triethoxysilanyl group in the polymer is hydrolyzed and condensed with the silicon hydroxyl group on the surface of the BG particles, forming a superjunction compared with the PCL-TES system. Finally, PCL-TES/BG fibers showed excellent shape memory performance in terms of shape fixation rate and shape recovery rate151.

Another way for BG to realize shape memory function is to combine it with natural polymers. Natural polymers such as chitosan can trigger a shape memory function through hydration152. The shape-responsive SBGC constructed using this method fully utilizes the shape memory ability of chitosan and the induced mineralization advantage of BG153. For example, BG nanofibers with excellent flexibility and bioactivity have been successfully developed by manipulating their crystallization and chain configuration. Using chitosan as a linker, the BG nanofibers are further assembled into a 3D fibrous scaffold that exhibits elastic behavior with full recovery from 80% compression. As shown in Fig. 5A, the elastic fiber scaffold deforms and adapts to irregularly shaped bone defects and subsequently undergoes a self-deployment behavior to achieve a perfect match with the defects154. The water absorption and expansion properties of chitosan result in excellent hemostatic ability. Quaternized chitosan (QCS) is mixed with MBG and frozen to promote cross-linking to prepare a multifunctional shape memory cryo-hydrogel. It is capable of rapidly absorbing blood and regaining its shape upon compression, ultimately forming a physical barrier to block sites of bleeding (Fig. 5B). Positively charged functional groups on the QCS molecular chain form an adhesion barrier by physically cross-linking blood cells. Moreover, MBG activates the intrinsic coagulation cascade through its surface negative potential, releasing bioactive ions to promote wound healing155. However, chitosan is not the only natural polymer with shape memory. Our research team selected a double cross-linked gelatin-hyaluronic acid hydrogel with self-expanding properties and successfully dispersed niobium-doped bioactive glass into the hydrogel network (Fig. 5C). In this study, the disadvantage of hydrogel self-expansion was the advantage of a shape memory response to achieve self-expansion bone increment156.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Shape memory SBGC: (A) Deformation and adaptation of irregularly shaped bone defects by elastic SBGC scaffolds. Adapted with permission from 154, copyright 2019 ACS Publications. (B) QCS-BG preparation method and its application as a crystalline gel. Adapted with permission from 155, copyright 2022 Elsevier. (C) Schematic diagram of GH-Nb BG hydrogel. Adapted with permission from 156, copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Shape memory SBGSs show great potential in bone tissue engineering. Nevertheless, the current materials have several limitations, including low mechanical strength to cope with the complex biomechanical environment of bone defects. 4D printing technology is emerging as the next generation of printing technology157. The preparation of shape-memory BG scaffolds by 4D printing may exploit the shape-memory properties of bioactive glass itself.

Applications of SBGC in complex tissue defects

Applications of SBGC in anti-tumor

Tumors are pathological tissues formed by the abnormal proliferation of cells, for which surgical removal is the primary treatment. However, removing residual tumor cells and repairing defective tissues are still major challenges160. Although the regenerative effects of BG on hard and soft tissues have been confirmed, the ability to remove residual tumor cells is limited161,162. SBGC targets and eliminates residual tumor cells by intelligently responding to internal environments and external stimuli while remodeling defective tissues. This section summarizes the application of SBGC in three areas: bone tumors, skin cancer, and breast cancer (Table 3).

Table 3.

The applications of SBGC

Type of Disease Functional component treatment strategy Ref.
Bone tumor DOX Drug delivery 42,165,166
UCNPs Bioimaging 167,170-173
Cu, Mn CDT 176
SrAl2O4: Eu, Dy PDT 177
Cu PTT 180
Mn PTT 181
Fe3O4 MTT 112
Skin tumor Mn PTT, immunotherapy 193
Ag2S nanodots PTT 194
PDA PTT 195
Nd PTT, temperature monitoring 148
Breast cancer Gox CDT 89
Cu, PDA PDT, PTT 201
R837, Nb2C PTT, immunotherapy 204
Oral infectious diseases QP5 Drug delivery 225
pluronic F127 Thermal response 226,227
hyaluronic acid Light response 230
Bone infection chitosan pH-response drug delivery 236
ZIF pH-response drug delivery 237
Ce Photothermal antibacterial 240
Skin wound infection Fe, tannin Photothermal antibacterial 242
PDA Photothermal antibacterial 245
Diabetes ZnO QDs, GOx/CAT Insulin delivery 253
GOx, CAT Insulin delivery 254
Diabetic ulcer Ce ROS is cleared by redox reaction 66
Co ROS is cleared by redox reaction 247
GA Photothermal antibacterial 260
MnO2, PDA Photothermal antibacterial 261
Diabetes with periodontitis EGCG ROS is cleared by redox reaction 249
Acute bleeding polyvinyl alcohol Shape memory 270
QCS Shape memory 155
Inflammatory bowel disease zein/sodium alginate Enzyme-response to drug delivery 271

Bone tumor

For bone tumors, especially osteosarcoma, surgical resection cannot completely remove the tumor cells. Moreover, bone defects removed by tumors cannot be repaired by themselves163. While filling bone defects, SBGC eliminates residual tumor cells in response to the bone tumor microenvironment and external stimuli. Advanced methods such as local chemotherapy, bioimaging, chemodynamic therapy (CDT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and hyperthermia are realized due to the responsiveness of SBGC.

First, SBGC achieves targeted release of anti-tumor drugs and bioimaging by responding to the internal and external environment. On the one hand, the acidic microenvironment of the tumor acts as the target of SBGC's response to achieve the release of anti-tumor drugs164. For example, DOX, a commonly used tumor chemotherapeutic, was loaded into functionalized MBG and targeted for release in the acidic microenvironment of bone tumors, effectively inhibiting bone tumor growth. Meanwhile, MBG contributes to long-term bone tissue regeneration42,165,166. On the other hand, monitoring drug release behavior and biomineralization is critical for the treatment of deep bone tumors167. Upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are widely used in bioimaging due to their ability to emit visible and NIR light under NIR excitation168,169. Among these, Er, Yb, etc. are often incorporated into the MBG networks to monitor biomineralization and DOX delivery behavior during bone tumor therapy167,170-173. For example, the results of biomineralization monitoring showed that the upconversion luminescence intensity of MBG:4Er/3Yb bursts with increasing biomineralization. Meanwhile, DOX quenched the green emission when loaded into MBG: 4Er/3Yb. When DOX was released, the green emissions recovered stably167. In another study, MBG/UCNPs (NaYF4: Yb/Er) were found to have intense red-light emission and could be used for drug delivery and drug delivery monitoring. In addition, MBG/UCNPs significantly enhanced the early osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in bone tumor defects through the activation of osteogenic markers ALP, Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), osteopontin, osteocalcin and bone salivary protein172.

Secondly, SBGC produces toxic chemicals through CDT and PDT that trigger apoptosis of bone tumor cells174,175. For example, Cu2+ and Mn3+ respond to the bone tumor microenvironment through ionic valence changes to enable CDT. While CDT induces apoptosis of tumor cells, the ions released by SBGC promote osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis, which have a good repair effect on the defect after bone tumor resection (Fig. 6A)176. Except for CDT, SBGC produces a large number of ROS to realize PDT in response to light stimulation, which induces apoptosis in tumor cells. For example, inside the SBGC scaffold, a persistent luminescent material (SrAl2O4: Eu, Dy) is used as a rechargeable internal light source. The material stores the energy produced by the excitation light and continues to emit light after the irradiation stops, achieving long-term effective progressive elimination of PDT osteosarcoma. The scaffold also directly promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and accelerates bone regeneration (Fig. 6B)177.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SBGC in bone tumors: (A) Schematic illustration of BSNs used for combined bone repair and anti-tumor. Adapted with permission from 176, copyright 2022 Elsevier. (B) In vivo osteosarcoma ablation efficacy of the BG@SAO-RB scaffold. Adapted with permission from 177, copyright 2024 Elsevier. (C) In vivo detection of osteogenesis by micro-CT and histopathological examination. Adapted with permission from 112, copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Finally, SBGC eliminates residual tumor cells through the high temperatures generated by thermotherapy. Tumor cells are poorly thermotolerant compared to normal cells. Therefore, thermotherapy can selectively kill tumor cells while protecting normal cells and tissues from damage178,179. Photothermal therapy (PTT) and magnetothermal therapy (MTT) are two methods of generating this therapeutic temperature. PTT is a treatment method that uses targeted recognition technology to gather near tumor tissue and convert light energy into heat energy under an external light source to kill cancer cells130. The light-responsive SBGC has the characteristics of photothermal conversion. For example, the Cu-doped SBGC composite hydrogels prepared by our research group inhibit tumor growth in vivo during the early implantation period, which stimulates the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by upregulating the expression of bone-related genes, significantly promoting new bone formation. The photothermal effect of this SBGC originates from the oxides formed by copper ions. The photothermal temperature can be controlled by Cu-BG concentration and NIR power density180. Similarly, another study used Mn to achieve controlled photothermal properties to promote bone regeneration while eliminating residual cancer cells181. Subsequently, SBGC produces a thermal effect in response to an alternating magnetic field to realize MTT182,183. Magnetic bioactive glass with high porosity by adding an appropriate proportion of Fe3O4 combined with calcium sulfate to form SBGC scaffolds. Under the magnetic field in vitro, the temperature of the scaffold can reach about 43°C, causing the apoptosis of bone tumor cells. Meanwhile, Ca2+ released by scaffolds promoted the proliferation and differentiation of BMSCs and achieved the repair of bone defects (Fig. 6C)112.

PTT and PDT summarized above can effectively induce apoptosis of bone tumor cells. However, it should be noted that for deep bone tumors, the insufficient penetration of NIR light may lead to treatment failure. In this condition, ultrasound is an effective alternative. In contrast to PDT, sonodynamic therapy is initiated by ultrasound and has a tissue penetration depth of more than 10 cm, which is widely used to ablate deep tumors. In addition to tumor ablation, ultrasound stimulates chondrocyte proliferation, accelerating the maturation of new bone184,185. Ultrasound-responsive hydrogels doped with HAP particles have been developed for bone regeneration. When triggered by ultrasound, this hydrogel can deliver therapeutic agents on demand. HAP particles as a solid phase to achieve a localized increase in ultrasound responsiveness186. Furthermore, silicon nanoparticles have been reported as sound sensitizers for ultrasound-assisted cancer therapy187. Based on these findings, we speculate that BG may be ultrasound-responsive, which is a promising treatment method for deep bone tumors.

Skin tumor

After surgical resection of a skin tumor, it is usually faced with the risk of large area defects difficult to heal, tissue infection, tumor recurrence, and so on188-190. PTT is the primary treatment method due to the superficial location of the skin wound. Light-responsive SBGC can inhibit the recurrence of skin tumors and promote the regeneration of damaged tissues.

Firstly, MBG can be used as a drug carrier for local administration to prevent tumor recurrence. Based on coaxial electrostatic spinning technology, a bifunctional topical wound dressing was prepared with MBG nanoparticles containing fluorouracil embedded in its core, which not only inhibits cancer but also promotes cell migration and proliferation, thus improving tissue regeneration191. Injectable hydrogel-based SBGC is an effective means to treat skin tumors and promote skin wound healing which forms a protective barrier over skin wounds, reducing the risk of infection192. Injectable hydrogels (BG-Mngel) formed by crosslinking sodium alginate with Mn-doped BG are used for anti-tumor immunotherapy of melanoma and postoperative wound healing. Mn2+ endows BG with excellent light responsiveness. NIR-mediated mild thermotherapy accelerates the release of Mn2+ from BG-Mngel and enhances the uptake of nanoparticles by cancer cells. Further, Mn2+ in synergy with mild hyperthermia activates the cGAS-STING immune pathway for tumor immunotherapy (Fig. 7A). The combination of BG-Mngel and immune checkpoint blockade such as α-PD-L1 can induce a robust T cell memory effect, thereby activating a long-term anti-tumor immune response (Fig. 7B). In addition, BG-Mngel upregulates the expression of genes related to angiogenesis and promotes skin tissue regeneration in the treatment of full-thickness wounds193. Similar hydrogel-based SBGC also achieves reproducible photothermal effects through doping with Ag2S nanodots and PDA. While efficiently ablating tumors, the SBGC effectively promotes epithelial reconstruction, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis in normal wounds194,195.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

SBGC in skin tumors: (A) BG-Mngel potentiates cGAS-STING activation enhanced by mild hyperthermia in vitro. Adapted with permission from 193, copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH. (B) Combination therapy of α-PD-L1 and BG-Mngel treatment activate long-term immune effects. Adapted with permission from193, copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH.

During PTT, one of the key issues is to ensure that the temperature is determined in situ to completely remove the tumor without damaging the surrounding normal tissues196. For this purpose, Nd-Ca-Si bioactive glass system composite hydrogels with tumor ablation and in situ temperature measurement functions were developed. This hydrogel-based SBGC has the best photothermal properties and fluoresces under 808 nm laser irradiation. This provides the optimal PTT temperature for effective tumor treatment with minimal normal tissue damage148.

Breast cancer

As one of the most common malignancies in women, breast cancer is highly invasive and recurrent197. SBGC responds to the tumor microenvironment and external stimuli to improve targeting and reduce side effects in breast cancer therapy. For both in situ and metastatic breast cancer, SBGC has shown great potential.

Cell membrane camouflage is an effective targeting method in the treatment of breast cancer lesions in situ. The key to cell membrane camouflage is its ability to mimic natural cellular characteristics, which allows BG to effectively evade recognition and attack by the immune system before reaching the tumor site198-200. Through The Cancer Genome Atlas Program TCGA database analysis, macrophages of the M0 phenotype have a specific high infiltration fraction in breast cancer patients and are therefore selected as cell-membrane-derived donors (Fig. 8A). Macrophage membrane camouflaged MBG avoids glucose and oxygen, which are found everywhere in the body, and delivers glucose oxidase (Gox) precisely to tumor lesions. In response to glucose and oxygen in the tumor environment, GOx produces ROS to induce oxidative stress and kill tumor cells89. Similar studies have utilized red blood cell membrane camouflage to avoid immune clearance, synergizing with chemotherapy, PDT, and PTT for anti-breast cancer therapy201.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Application of SBGC in breast cancer: (A)The cell membrane donor was identified as M0 phenotype macrophage by TCGA analysis. Adapted with permission from 89, copyright 2023 Elsevier. (B) Mechanism of BG@NbSiR-scaffold-based PTT plus anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy depicted by single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Adapted with permission from 204, copyright 2020 Wiley-VCH.

In addition to treating in situ lesions, another major challenge in breast cancer is the prevention and treatment of cancer metastasis202. Bone is the most common site of breast cancer metastasis, resulting in an imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation203. This requires the design of multifunctional SBGC that not only simultaneously eliminates primary/metastatic tumors, but also promotes bone tissue regeneration. The immunostimulant R837 and niobium carbide were combined in the BG scaffold (BG@NbSiR). SBGC responds to light stimulation to produce a thermal effect while incorporating PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade to activate the immune system to eliminate primary and metastatic tumors. In particular, the combination therapy stimulates the host to build a strong long-term immune memory, providing long-term protection against breast cancer, including bone metastases. The degradation products of the scaffold also facilitated the subsequent process of bone regeneration. In further studies, single-cell transcriptomics demonstrated that the combination therapy downregulated the level of copy number variation in tumors and suppressed tumor stem cells, thereby reducing the cancer burden (Fig. 8B)204.

The molecular mechanism of SBGC killing tumors is diverse and complex. Firstly, SBGC enhances the level of oxidative stress locally in tumors, inducing the accumulation of ROS and leading to apoptosis or necrosis of tumor cells. The tumor site is a chemical microenvironment that is slightly acidic and overexpresses H2O2 and glutathione205. Ions doped in SBGC respond to the acidic microenvironment of high levels of H2O2, generating hydroxyl radicals (·OH) with strong oxidizing properties that induce apoptosis in tumor cells206. Ions such as Fe, Cu, and Mn can all undergo this reaction in the bone tumor microenvironment207,208. Among them, Self-expanding cuproptosis further activates immunogenic cell death, triggering a powerful immune response that combines with immune checkpoint blockade to effectively eradicate metastatic tumors209. In addition, the SBGC responds to an exogenous magnetic field by releasing excess Ca2+, leading to calcium overload and tumor cell death112. SBGC can also enhance anti-tumor immune responses and induce long-term T-cell memory by activating the cGAS-STING pathway and PD-L1 immune checkpoint blocking193,204.

In terms of promoting bone tissue repair, SBGC is mainly adopted to enhance the early osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in bone tumor defects through the activation of osteogenic markers ALP, runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), osteopontin, osteocalcin and bone salivary protein172. In addition, the Ca2+ released by SBGC activates the calcium-sensitive receptor CaSR of osteoblasts, further promoting bone formation103.

In addition to the acidic environment mentioned above, hypoxia is an important tumor microenvironment210. Inadequate oxygen supply within the tumor due to rapid growth and irregular vascular network, resulting in local hypoxia211. However, SBGC in response to a hypoxic microenvironment has not been reported to treat tumors. Nanoparticles containing the hypoxia-responsive electron acceptor nitroimidazole or hypoxia-sensitive moieties are effective in achieving a response to the hypoxic environment of tumors212-214. Functionalized MBG can graft organic functional molecules or bioactive substances onto its surface. Therefore, this approach can be used to construct hypoxia-responsive SBGC for targeted tumor therapy. Moreover, inhibition of Na/K-ATPase is a promising cancer therapy. Ultra-small vanadate prodrug nanoparticles modified with bovine serum albumin were synthesized by a combined reductive coordination strategy with natural polyphenol tannic acid. During NIR irradiation, the interaction between vanadate(V) and Na/K-ATPase is selectively enhanced to achieve stronger inhibition of Na/ K-ATPase, resulting in a powerful cell-killing effect215.

Application of SBGC in infectious diseases

Infection control is particularly important in the field of tissue engineering. Although traditional treatments, such as systemic antibiotics, surgical debridement, wound drainage, and implant removal, have been widely used, the effect is not satisfactory216-218. By adjusting its physical or chemical structure in response to the internal and external environment, SBGC achieves adaptive antibacterial activity. In the treatment of oral infectious diseases, bone tissue infections, and skin wound infections, SBGC demonstrates excellent intelligent antimicrobial and restorative effects.

Oral infectious diseases

The oral cavity is a complex and complete micro-ecosystem with specific temperature, humidity, pH, and a rich microbiota, which together maintain the stability of the oral ecosystem219-222. SBGC responds to environmental changes in the oral cavity for better curative effects. The treatment of oral infections includes caries and periodontitis.

By responding to the acidic environment at the caries site and the constant temperature in the mouth, SBGC treats and restores caries. Plaque formation significantly lowers the local pH level. This acidic environment leads to demineralization of the teeth, which in turn leads to the formation of dental caries. This pathologic process can be used as a design idea for SBGC223,224. For example, amelogenin-derived peptide QP5 is loaded into the porous structure of MBG by enhanced electrostatic adsorption. MBG/QP5 shows pH responsiveness in acidic environments. Therapeutic ions and functional peptides are released in a sequential cascade and eventually, pH is regulated to a neutral state, preventing further progression of caries. At the same time, MBG/QP5 was internalized by dental pulp cells, which improved the retention of intracellular therapeutic ions and peptides (Fig. 9A). The migration, differentiation, and mineralization of dental pulp cells were further promoted, including the increase of ALP activity, the formation of mineralized nodules and the up-regulation of mineralization-related genes (Fig. 9B)225. In addition to pH changes, SBGC also responds to oral temperature to achieve restoration of caries. The temperature-sensitive hydrogel with fluorine-doped bioactive glass (F-BG) as the main body is gelled at room temperature while curing in response to oral temperatures. The cured F-BG has sufficient bond strength and long-term release of fluorine, which effectively prevents microleakage and secondary caries226. However, the oral environment is characterized by wetness. When fluids such as blood and saliva are present at the injection site, the coagulation properties of the hydrogel will be affected. Therefore, the ultrasonic scalar is introduced based on temperature response. Sufficient thermal energy is generated by sound waves to rapidly cure the injectable SBGC in situ. This can effectively repair dental tissue defects and promote dentin regeneration227.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

The application of SBGC in infectious diseases: (A) MBG/QP5 is internalized and exists in the cytoplasm of human dental pulp cells. Adapted with permission from 225, copyright 2022 SageJournals. (B) The combination of mesoporous bioactive glass MBG/QP5 treated the odontogenic differentiation and mineralization of progenitor pulp cells. Adapted with permission from 225, copyright 2022 SageJournals. (C) Levels of inflammation and angiogenesis in healed skin tissue. Adapted with permission from 242, copyright 2023 ACS publications.

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that invades the gums and periodontal tissues, which is the leading cause of tooth loss in adults. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and guided bone regeneration (GBR) are effective methods to promote periodontal tissue regeneration using physical barriers228,229. Gel-based SBGC gelatinizes in response to light stimulation, thus providing the barrier function required for GBR membranes. A light-responsive SBGC gel (MBGN-MNC1/MHA) loaded with minocycline hydrochloride can be injected directly into the irregular periodontal defect area, which then responds to ultraviolet light by rapidly solidifying and molding. MBGN-MNC1/MHA significantly decreased the expression of macrophage inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α, while promoting the expression of osteogenesis-related genes including ALP, Runx2, and OPN230. There is no doubt that SBGC shows potential in the treatment of irregular periodontal defects caused by periodontitis. However, due to its easy degradation and poor mechanical properties, the barrier function of hydrogels needs further investigation compared with traditional GBR membranes.

Bone infection

Bone tissue infections are common after fracture, bone grafting, or bone reconstruction surgery. Any surgical intervention involving the implantation of biomaterials and the application of fixation devices carries the risk of implant-associated infections231-233. Antimicrobial drug delivery and photothermal sterilization are the main modalities used by SBGC to treat bone tissue infections.

The microenvironment of infected bone tissue is slightly acidic due to bacterial metabolism234. SBGC responds to this microenvironment to ensure that antibiotics are released at the site of infection. This improves the bioavailability of the drug and avoids the side effects associated with systemic antibiotic use235. For example, BG-HA@CS has pH-responsive drug-release properties. The expansion of chitosan in an acidic environment opens holes in the hydroxyapatite shell, accelerating the release of vancomycin. With the release of the drug, the unconverted BG dissolves, raising the local pH. Changes in pH, in turn, regulate the solubilization behavior of chitosan, enabling self-regulated drug release236. Vancomycin-loaded zeolitic imidazolate frameworks-8 (ZIF-8@VAN) are deposited on a 3D-printed BG scaffold in another study. ZIF is acid-responsive and degrades at the site of infection to release antibiotics. Also, Zn2+ released by ZIF has antimicrobial activity237. Although the osteogenic effect of BG has been recognized, the above studies do not investigate the osteogenic effect after anti-infection.

In addition to antibiotics, metal ions also show excellent antibacterial effects238. Moreover, some metal ions also have excellent light responsiveness and can destroy bacteria through the photothermal effect239. Ce-BG showed excellent photothermal bactericidal properties under 808 nm laser irradiation while promoting osteoblast proliferation240. Combining the antimicrobial effect of metal ions with photothermal sterilization is expected to realize efficient antimicrobial treatment without antibiotics.

Skin wound infection

Infection control is an important step to ensure effective wound repair. Infection causes inflammation and tissue damage, which can delay healing time241. Light-responsive hydrogel-based SBGC has broad application prospects in treating wound infection and promoting wound healing.

Hydrogel provides the right microenvironment for repairing skin damage. For example, in the composite hydrogel containing Fe-BGs, the chelation of Fe3+ with tannin endowed the hydrogel with good photothermal antimicrobial ability, and the response to NIR effectively activated the angiogenic ability (Fig. 9C)242. In another study, Ag2S nano-dots conjugated with iron-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles (BGN-Fe-Ag2S) were incorporated into polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) in situ gel to develop a photoactivated injectable hydrogel. In a full-thickness skin wound model, this hydrogel can not only eliminate multidrug-resistant bacteria by hydrolysis of the bioactive glass but also accelerate wound healing and regenerate more skin attachments194. The Cu ion has effective antibacterial activity and destroys the cell membrane through electrostatic interaction between its positive charge and the negatively charged microbial cell membrane243. Cu-coordination PDA wrapped into bioactive BGN@PDA-Cu nanoparticles can significantly reverse the inflammatory phenotype of macrophages and promote angiogenesis by activating hypoxia-inducing factor HIF-1α and heat shock protein HSP90 pathway244. In addition, due to its photothermal properties and nitric oxide release activity, PDA is often used in skin injury repair. NO, Ca, and Si ions released by PDA-BGNPs modified with β-cyclodextrin have the benefit of regulating inflammation, promoting fibroblast proliferation, and stimulating angiogenesis245.

Other infectious diseases

In addition to localized tissue infections, SBGC also shows potential applications for the surveillance of systemic infectious diseases. Specific serum biomarkers are critical for early diagnosis of disease and assessment of disease progression. For example, procalcitonin (PCT), as a biomarker of sepsis, is beneficial for early diagnosis in critically ill patients. Researchers have proposed a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor that utilizes Pd nanoparticle-loaded Fe3S4 as a signal indicator and functionalized pineal MBG as a marker for signal amplification. Based on the response of the signal-off mode with sensitive changes in the current signal, this SBGC sensor can detect PCT with high sensitivity. This technique is suitable for the sensitive detection of PCT and the clinical diagnosis of other disease biomarkers and cells246.

The antibacterial mechanism of SBGC is firstly to induce oxidative stress by releasing ions to generate reactive oxygen species, which leads to DNA, protein, and lipid damage of pathogens247,248. In addition to reducing the expression of macrophage inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α230, SBGC can also directly regulate the transformation of macrophages from m1 type to m2 type by promoting autophagy and weakening the inhibition of autophagy flow. In addition, SBGC also indirectly regulates the polarization phenotype of macrophages by reducing the activation of NF-κb in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and restoring their immunomodulatory capacity249. In promoting soft tissue regeneration, SBGC activates the eNOS/NO signaling pathway to enhance the adhesion, migration, and differentiation of endothelial cells and promotes angiogenesis102, as well as the proliferation of fibroblasts, which promotes epithelial reconstruction and collagen deposition in normal wounds.

Application of SBGC in diabetes and its complications

Diabetes is a common metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia. The diabetes microenvironment is complex and variable, typically characterized by chronic inflammation, high oxidative stress, and local blood flow disturbances that lead to tissue dysfunction and prevent normal wound healing250-252. By responding to the diabetic microenvironment, SBGC delivers insulin to help regulate systemic blood glucose levels. At the same time, SBGC also accelerates the healing of difficult-to-heal wounds and promotes tissue regeneration and repair during localized treatment.

Insulin delivery

Daily subcutaneous insulin injections are the standard diabetes treatment, which is cumbersome and invasive. Therefore, a smart delivery system that is minimally invasive, painless, and controls the release of insulin with blood sugar levels is essential. A pH-responsive and glucose-mediated SBGC delivery system is developed to enable controlled and painless insulin administration. Insulin and glucose response factors (GOx/CAT) are encapsulated in MBG, and ZnO QDs act as pH response switches to coat MBG nanopores. GOx/CAT catalyzes the production of gluconic acid from glucose, resulting in a local decrease in pH. The ZnO QDs dissolve under acidic conditions, triggering the disassembly of pH-sensitive MBG, which releases pre-loaded insulin (Fig. 10A)253. Similar studies control insulin release with a complex enzyme layer of polyethyleneimine, GOx, and CAT. The complex enzyme layer converts glucose to gluconic acid. Changes in pH in the microenvironment lead to structural disruption of the complex enzyme layer, realizing the gradual release of insulin254.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Application of SBGC in diabetes and its complications: (A) Schematic preparation of glucose-mediated microneedles integrated with ZnO QDs capped MBG for transdermal delivery of insulin. Adapted with permission from 253, copyright 2018 ACS publications. (B) M/Q/CeBG hydrogel attenuates H2O2-induced L929 cell injury and apoptosis. Adapted with permission from 66, copyright 2024 Elsevier. (C) Schematic illustration of ABBSG@EGCG fabrication by functional Borosilicate bioactive glass and epigallocatechin gallate for healing of alveolar bone defects in diabetes. Adapted with permission from 249, copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Diabetic ulcer

Diabetic ulcers heal more slowly and are more susceptible to infection than normal wounds. Oxidative stress caused by excess ROS is the key factor in delayed healing. Unbalanced ROS not only delays angiogenesis but also leads to a long-term state of excessive inflammation that impedes wound healing. In addition, persistent high blood sugar in diabetic wounds makes them more susceptible to microbial infections250,255,256.

First, SBGC responds to high levels of ROS in the lesion environment, reducing oxidative stress, reversing inflammation, and promoting healing of difficult-to-heal wounds. For example, CeBG-based hydrogel responds to and scavenges ROS via redox reactions and attenuates H2O2-induced cell damage and apoptosis (Fig. 10B). At the same time, Ce-BG hydrogel stimulates the proliferation and migration of dermal fibroblasts66. Similarly, Co-doped BG also responds to ROS. Co3O4 microcrystals are formed in situ by the chemical reaction of cobalt with ROS (mainly H2O2), which plays a decisive role in clearing various ROS and inhibiting the inflammatory cascade. Moreover, cobalt shows specific therapeutic properties that promote angiogenesis, increasing endothelial migration and tubule formation247.

In addition to overproducing ROS, high glucose levels exacerbate wound bacterial infections. The high-glucose environment provides rich nutrients for the bacteria and suppresses the immune system's response, leading to more severe and stubborn infections257-259. Thus, a non-antibiotic drug formulation is proposed for diabetic wound infection. In this scheme, gallic acid (GA) and BG produce synergistic effects through multiple biological pathways. On the one hand, GA has an antibacterial effect and further enhances antibacterial ability through a photothermal effect. On the other hand, Si released by BG simultaneously regulates inflammation and promotes angiogenesis260. Although the antioxidant capacity of gallic acid has been extensively documented, the effect of GA@BG in controlling oxidative stress on diabetic-infected wounds is not described in detail. In another study, MnO2 is deposited on the surface of MBG to construct SBGC (MnO2@PDA-BGs) with dual antioxidant and antibacterial functions. MnO2@PDA-BGs show a photothermal effect under acidic conditions, showing excellent antibacterial properties. Meanwhile, MnO2 reduces oxidative stress by scavenging free radicals, releasing oxygen to improve the hypoxic microenvironment of the wound, which helps promote vascularization and collagen deposition261.

Diabetes with periodontitis

Periodontitis is the sixth most common complication of diabetes262. Plaque is the initiator of periodontitis, and diabetes exacerbates the localized inflammation caused by plaque. What's more, the high glucose environment and the formation of advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) induce ROS accumulation, further exacerbating the inflammatory response. In addition, the high glucose environment inhibited the bone regeneration capacity of BMSCs, leading to alveolar bone resorption and tooth loosening263-266. Therefore, SBGC needs to respond adaptively to this specific microenvironment to slow or reverse the process of periodontitis.

For hyperglycemia and oxidative stress in diabetes, a glucose-H2O2-responsive SBGC scaffold is prepared. The scaffold releases epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in the diabetic environment, synergically regulating abnormal inflammation by directly regulating the polarization state of macrophages. Further studies reveal that EGCG directly regulates the macrophage transition from M1-type to M2-type by promoting autophagy and attenuating the inhibition of autophagic flow. In addition, EGCG also indirectly regulates the polarization phenotype of macrophages by reducing the activation of NF-κb in BMSCs and restoring their immunomodulatory ability (Fig. 10C). Altered macrophage phenotype reduces local inflammation and thus improves the ability to repair diabetic alveolar bone249.

Applications of SBGC in other diseases

Acute bleeding

Acute bleeding refers to a condition in which a large amount of blood is lost in a short period, usually caused by trauma, surgery, or disease. Control of bleeding is a critical step in the management of acute trauma. Therefore, the development of rapid and efficient hemostatic methods is particularly important267-269.

Shape memory SBGC offers the possibility of rapid and effective hemostasis. A bioactive self-expanding cold gel (BGNCs) composed of highly flexible bioactive glass nanofibers and citric acid crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol. Due to the flexibility of BG nanofibers, BGNCs exhibit rapid self-expansion, injectability, and superelasticity, and firmly adhere to various tissues. These excellent properties make BGNCs exhibit excellent hemostatic performance in liver incompressible hemorrhage models and arterial injury models270. A similar shape-memory cryogel cross-links QCS to BG, which is capable of rapidly absorbing blood and regaining its shape upon compression, forming a physical barrier to block bleeding sites155.

Inflammatory bowel disease

The key to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease is to relieve inflammation and promote intestinal tissue regeneration. Core-shell microspheres of zein/sodium alginate are used for oral delivery of BG. The microspheres dissolve in a simulated intestinal environment, which helps prevent BG from dissolving prematurely in the stomach. In response to specific enzymes in the intestinal environment, the zein and alginate in the microspheres are degraded by the enzymes, releasing BG to exert therapeutic effects. In mouse models of acute and chronic colitis, BG significantly reduced intestinal inflammation, promoted epithelial tissue regeneration, and partially restored microbiota homeostasis. Thus, the targeted release of BG in the intestine provides a novel, cost-effective therapeutic approach for the effective treatment of inflammatory bowel disease271.

Perspectives

Although SBGC has shown great potential in tissue engineering and medical therapeutics, several challenges remain in the field. First, the microenvironment changes dynamically during disease progression, including pH, oxygen levels, levels of inflammatory factors and metabolites. Therefore, the design of SBGC needs to take these dynamic changes into account to ensure that they can still perform their functions effectively under different pathologic conditions. Second, the biocompatibility and immune response of SBGC in vivo is also a key issue. Although current studies have demonstrated the efficacy of SBGC in some applications, the immune response and the effect of biodegradation products on the organism after long-term implantation still need to be studied. Finally, the smart response capability of SBGC relies on their interaction with cells and tissues. To improve its performance, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of cell-material interactions is needed.

Individualized treatment is becoming a trend. Customization of the SBGC with in-depth study of the patient's genetic information, cellular status, and lesion characteristics to enable a more precise response to the disease state. Combining sensor technology and biofeedback systems, the SBGC monitors changes in the microenvironment in real time, such as changes in specific disease signals and inflammation levels. Based on this information, the SBGC provides feedback and adjusts treatment steps to maximize the effectiveness of treatment. In addition, appropriate signaling indicators and markers are selected for continuous and unencumbered remote monitoring of disease states and biomarkers. Examples include monitoring blood glucose levels for early diagnosis and subsequent treatment of diabetes, detecting troponin to help predict the risk of myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular events, and detecting tumor markers in serum for early screening and diagnosis of cancer, among others272-275.

3D-printed technology has greatly advanced the field of tissue engineering, brought great potential, and promised to the field of personalized medicine and injury repair. However, traditional 3D-printed still has some limitations, such as a lack of dynamism and responsiveness276. To overcome these limitations, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) came up with the concept of 4D-printed technology in 2013. Unlike traditional 3D-printed, 4D-printed considers changes in the material over time. The printed material automatically deforms or changes its properties under certain conditions277-279. The technology of BG in 3D-printed is relatively mature, but research in 4D-printed has not been reported. 4D-printed bioactive glass responds dynamically to the environment or stimuli to accommodate a variety of irregular defective morphologies. While 4D-printed adds design complexity, fabricated stimulus-responsive structures provide dynamic, reprogrammable deformations or actions that mimic the complex physical, biochemical, and mechanical processes of tissues280,281.

In addition to new preparation methods, novel types of materials have been developed recently including programmable, bioelectronic, and cell membrane coating materials. Combining SBGC with new materials will gain more functions which will better repair complex tissue defects. For example, bioelectronic materials have the problem of no detectable signal or low signal sensitivity; while SBGC has the function of generating acceptable signals such as temperature and pH by responding microenvironment, improving the sensitivity of bioelectronic materials. Meanwhile, the physical and chemical signals generated by smart response will also participate in the construction of programmable biomaterials, achieving dynamic construction of materials in vivo. In addition, to address the problem of low targeting of SBGC for tumor treatment, cell membranes can be wrapped around the SBGC particles to construct cell membrane-encapsulated materials to achieve precise targeting.

Most importantly, although this paper summarizes the SBGC, it is worth noting that most of the intelligent response to stimuli is the role played by other components of the composite. Therefore, in the future, the construction of real smart materials, in which only BG is involved, is the research direction.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32171311, U23A20692), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2022B1515120048) and the Young Talent Support Project of Guangzhou Association for Science and Technology (No. QT-2023-020).

Author contributions

Yulian Yang: Writing - original draft; Yonghao Qiu: Writing- original draft; Cai Lin: Revise the original draft; Xiaofeng Chen: Project administration, writing review & editing; Fujian Zhao: Project administration, writing review & editing.

Abbreviations

AIEgens

aggregation-induced emission luminogens

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

ACP

acid phosphatase

AGEs

advanced glycation end products

BG

bioactive glass

Bi

Bismuth

BF

barium ferrite

BMSCs

bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Ce

Cerium

CNT

carbon nanotube

CDT

chemodynamic therapy

CAT

catalase

Co

Cobalt

DOX

Doxorubicin

ES

electrical stimulation

EGCG

epigallocatechin gallate

Gox

glucose oxidase

GTR

guided tissue regeneration

GA

gallic acid

GBR

guided bone regeneration

HAP

hydroxyapatite

H2O2

hydrogen peroxide

KNN

potassium-sodium niobate

LCST

lower critical dissolution temperature

MBG

mesoporous bioactive glass

Mo

Molybdenum

MTT

magnetothermal therapy

NIR

near-infrared

PLGA

poly-L-glutamic acid

PLGA

poly-L-glutamic acid

PTA

polytannic acid

PIB

p (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-butyl methylacrylate)

PDA

polydopamine

PVFT

polyvinylidene difluoride

PDT

photodynamic therapy

PTT

photothermal therapy

PCT

procalcitonin

QCS

quaternized chitosan

ROS

reactive oxygen species

Runx2

runt-related transcription factor 2

SBGC

smart bioactive glass composites

SPR

surface plasmon resonance

UCNPs

upconversion nanoparticles

UV

ultraviolet

ZnO QDs

ZnO quantum dots

ZIF

zeolitic imidazolate frameworks

ε-PL

ε-polylysine

References

  • 1.Baino F, Fiorilli S, Vitale-Brovarone C. Bioactive glass-based materials with hierarchical porosity for medical applications: Review of recent advances. Acta Biomater. 2016;42:18–32. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simila HO, Boccaccini AR. Sol-gel bioactive glass containing biomaterials for restorative dentistry: A review. Dent Mater. 2022;38:725–47. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vallet-Regi M, Salinas AJ. Mesoporous bioactive glasses for regenerative medicine. Mater Today Bio. 2021;11:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Turner J, Nandakumar A, Anilbhai N, Boccaccini AR, Jones JR, Jell G. The effect of Si species released from bioactive glasses on cell behaviour: A quantitative review. Acta Biomater. 2023;170:39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shearer A, Montazerian M, Sly JJ, Hill RG, Mauro JC. Trends and perspectives on the commercialization of bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater. 2023;160:14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aslam AA, Akram J, Mehmood RA, Mubarak A, Khatoon A, Akbar U. et al. Boron-based bioactive glasses: Properties, processing, characterization and applications. Ceram Int. 2023;49:19595–605. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou D, Yan X, Xiao L, Wang J, Wei J. Gold capped mesoporous bioactive glass guides bone regeneration via BMSCs recruitment and drug adaptive release. Chem Eng J. 2024;487:150546. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gu J, Liu X, Cui P, Yi X. Multifunctional bioactive glasses with spontaneous degradation for simultaneous osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration. Biomater Adv. 2023;154:213626. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zambon A, Malavasi G, Pallini A, Fraulini F, Lusvardi G. Cerium Containing Bioactive Glasses: A Review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:4388–401. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cui Y, Hong S, Jiang W, Li X, Zhou X, He X. et al. Engineering mesoporous bioactive glasses for emerging stimuli-responsive drug delivery and theranostic applications. Bioact Mater. 2024;34:436–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu H, Monavari M, Zheng K, Distler T, Ouyang L, Heid S. et al. 3D Bioprinting of Multifunctional Dynamic Nanocomposite Bioinks Incorporating Cu-Doped Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering. Small. 2022;18:2104996. doi: 10.1002/smll.202104996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tabia Z, Mabrouk KE, Bricha M, Nouneh K. Mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles doped with magnesium: drug delivery and acellular in vitro bioactivity. RSC Adv. 2019;9:12232–46. doi: 10.1039/c9ra01133a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El-Fiqi A, Kim T-H, Kim M, Eltohamy M, Won J-E, Lee E-J. et al. Capacity of mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles to deliver therapeutic molecules. Nanoscale. 2012;4:7475–88. doi: 10.1039/c2nr31775c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anand A, Sengupta S, Kaňková H, Švančárková A, Beltrán AM, Galusek D. et al. Influence of Copper-Strontium Co-Doping on Bioactivity, Cytotoxicity and Antibacterial Activity of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass. Gels. 2022;8:743. doi: 10.3390/gels8110743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao S, Zhang J, Zhu M, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Ma Y. et al. Effects of functional groups on the structure, physicochem-ical and biological properties of mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:1612–23. doi: 10.1039/c4tb01287a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verné E, Ferraris S, Vitale-Brovarone C, Spriano S, Bianchi CL, Naldoni A. et al. Alkaline phosphatase grafting on bioactive glasses and glass ceramics. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:229–40. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gupta N, Singh A, Dey N, Chattopadhyay S, Joseph JP, Gupta D. et al. Pathway-Driven Peptide-Bioglass Nanocomposites as the Dynamic and Self-Healable Matrix. Chem Mater. 2021;33:589–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jiang S, Zhang Y, Shu Y, Wu Z, Cao W, Huang W. Amino-functionalized mesoporous bioactive glass for drug delivery. Biomed Mater. 2017;12:025017. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa645d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhu Y, Ma Z, Kong L, He Y, Chan HF, Li H. Modulation of macrophages by bioactive glass/sodium alginate hy-drogel is crucial in skin regeneration enhancement. Biomaterials. 2020;256:120216. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moreira CDF, Carvalho SM, Mansur HS, Pereira MM. Thermogelling chitosan-collagen-bioactive glass nanoparticle hybrids as potential injectable systems for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;58:1207–16. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Almeida AC, Vale AC, Reis RL, Alves NM. Bioactive and adhesive properties of multilayered coatings based on catechol-functionalized chitosan/hyaluronic acid and bioactive glass nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;157:119–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fu S, Du X, Zhu M, Tian Z, Wei D, Zhu Y. 3D printing of layered mesoporous bioactive glass/sodium alginate-sodium alginate scaffolds with controllable dual-drug release behaviors. Biomed Mater. 2019;14:065011. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab4166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu J, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Zhu W, Wang A, Xu M. et al. Rapid hemostasis and excellent antibacterial cerium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass/chitosan composite sponge for hemostatic material. Mater Today Chem. 2022;23:100735. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun Y, Chen CS, Fu J. Forcing Stem Cells to Behave: A Biophysical Perspective of the Cellular Microenvironment. Annu Rev Biophys. 2012;41:519–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sato A, Rahman NIA, Shimizu A, Ogita H. Cell-to-cell contact-mediated regulation of tumor behavior in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Sci. 2021;112:4005–12. doi: 10.1111/cas.15114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Keung AJ, Kumar S, Schaffer DV. Presentation Counts: Microenvironmental Regulation of Stem Cells by Biophysical and Material Cues. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:533–56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barthes J, Özçelik H, Hindié M, Ndreu-Halili A, Hasan A, Vrana NE. Cell microenvironment engineering and monitoring for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: the recent advances. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:921905. doi: 10.1155/2014/921905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yao Y, Zhang H, Wang Z, Ding J, Wang S, Huang B. et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive biomaterials mediate tissue microenvironments and tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:5019–37. doi: 10.1039/c9tb00847k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kato Y, Ozawa S, Miyamoto C, Maehata Y, Suzuki A, Maeda T. et al. Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2013;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-13-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deng Z, Li J, Liu H, Luo T, Yang Y, Yang M. et al. A light-controlled DNA nanothermometer for temperature sensing in the cellular membrane microenvironment. Biosens Bioelectron. 2022;216:114627. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barmaki S, Jokinen V, Obermaier D, Blokhina D, Korhonen M, Ras RHA. et al. A microfluidic oxygen sink to create a targeted cellular hypoxic microenvironment under ambient atmospheric conditions. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:167–79. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Y, Wu Y, Long L, Yang L, Fu D, Hu C. et al. Inflammation-Responsive Drug-Loaded Hydrogels with Sequential Hemostasis, Antibacterial, and Anti-Inflammatory Behavior for Chronically Infected Diabetic Wound Treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:33584–99. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c09889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yan L-X, Chen L-J, Zhao X, Yan X-P. pH Switchable Nanoplatform for In Vivo Persistent Luminescence Imaging and Precise Photothermal Therapy of Bacterial Infection. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1909042. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu W, Wang T, Yang C, Darvell BW, Wu J, Lin K. et al. Alkaline biodegradable implants for osteoporotic bone defects—importance of microenvironment pH. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:93–104. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3217-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gerweck LE, Seetharaman K. Cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: potential exploitation for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:1194–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang J, Wu D, Li M-F, Feng J. Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Based on Charge-Reversal Plug-Gate Nanovalves and Acid-Decomposable ZnO Quantum Dots for Intracellular Drug Delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:26666–73. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b08460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wu S, Huang X, Du X. pH- and redox-triggered synergistic controlled release of a ZnO-gated hollow mesoporous silica drug delivery system. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:1426–32. doi: 10.1039/c4tb01794c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng K, Lu M, Rutkowski B, Dai X, Yang Y, Taccardi N. et al. ZnO quantum dots modified bioactive glass nanoparticles with pH-sensitive release of Zn ions, fluorescence, antibacterial and osteogenic properties. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:7936–49. doi: 10.1039/c6tb02053d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang C, Guo W, Cui L, Xiang D, Cai K, Lin H. et al. pH-responsive controlled-release system based on mesoporous bioglass materials capped with mineralized hydroxyapatite. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;36:237–43. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li Y, Zhi X, Lin J, You X, Yuan J. Preparation and characterization of DOX loaded keratin nanoparticles for pH/GSH dual responsive release. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;73:189–97. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang X, Wang G, Zhang Y. Research on the biological activity and doxorubicin release behavior in vitro of mesoporous bioactive SiO2-CaO-P2O5 glass nanospheres. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;419:531–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu C, Fan W, Chang J. Functional mesoporous bioactive glass nanospheres: synthesis, high loading efficiency, controllable delivery of doxorubicin and inhibitory effect on bone cancer cells. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:2710–8. doi: 10.1039/c3tb20275e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zeng X, Liu G, Tao W, Ma Y, Zhang X, He F. et al. A Drug-Self-Gated Mesoporous Antitumor Nanoplatform Based on pH-Sensitive Dynamic Covalent Bond. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27:1605985. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang M, Xu L, Lin M, Li Z, Sun J. Fabrication of reversible pH-responsive aggregation-induced emission luminogens assisted by a block copolymer via a dynamic covalent bond. Polym Chem. 2021;12:2825–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tao A, Huang GL, Igarashi K, Hong T, Liao S, Stellacci F. et al. Polymeric Micelles Loading Proteins through Concurrent Ion Complexation and pH-Cleavable Covalent Bonding for In Vivo Delivery. Macromol Biosci. 2020;20:1900161. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201900161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bennewitz MF, Lobo TL, Nkansah MK, Ulas G, Brudvig GW, Shapiro EM. Biocompatible and pH-Sensitive PLGA Encapsulated MnO Nanocrystals for Molecular and Cellular MRI. ACS Nano. 2011;5:3438–46. doi: 10.1021/nn1019779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zolnik BS, Burgess DJ. Effect of acidic pH on PLGA microsphere degradation and release. J Controlled Release. 2007;122:338–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Das MP, Pandey G, Neppolian B, Das J. Design of poly-l-glutamic acid embedded mesoporous bioactive glass nanospheres for pH-stimulated chemotherapeutic drug delivery and antibacterial susceptibility. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;202:111700. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hollinger J, Wong MEK. The integrated processes of hard tissue regeneration with special emphasis on fracture healing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 1996;82:594–606. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80431-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Luo J, Xie Z, Lam JWY, Cheng L, Chen H, Qiu C. et al. Aggregation-induced emission of 1-methyl-1,2,3,4,5-pentaphenylsilole. Chem Commun. 2001;(18):1740–1. doi: 10.1039/b105159h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li D. Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Functionalized with AIEgens for pH Sensing and Drug Delivery. J Bionic Eng. 2017;14:672–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang D, Zhang C, Ren L, Li D, Yu J. Biodegradable AIEgen-functionalised mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for drug delivery and cell imaging. Inorg Chem Front. 2018;5:474–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xia W, Chang J, Lin J, Zhu J. The pH-controlled dual-drug release from mesoporous bioactive glass/polypeptide graft copolymer nanomicelle composites. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69:546–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen X, Tu Y, Cheng S, Guo X, Lu T, Guo Y. et al. A colorimetric and ratiometric fluorescent paper chip for biogenic amine monitoring based on a simple pH-sensitive AIEgen. Chem Eng J. 2022;450:137928. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang X, Zhang Y, Lin C, Zhong W. Sol-gel derived terbium-containing mesoporous bioactive glasses nanospheres: In vitro hydroxyapatite formation and drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;160:406–15. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li R, Jia Z, Trush MA. Defining ROS in Biology and Medicine. React Oxyg Species Apex NC. 2016;1:9–21. doi: 10.20455/ros.2016.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sies H. On the history of oxidative stress: Concept and some aspects of current development. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2018;7:122–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jones DP. Redefining Oxidative Stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:1865–79. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang S, Li Y, Ma C, Huang D, Chen S, Zhu S. et al. Enzymatic molecular modification of water-soluble polyphenols: Synthesis, structure, bioactivity and application. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63:12637–51. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2105301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bendary E, Francis RR, Ali HMG, Sarwat MI, El Hady S. Antioxidant and structure-activity relationships (SARs) of some phenolic and anilines compounds. Ann Agric Sci. 2013;58:173–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen Z, Farag MA, Zhong Z, Zhang C, Yang Y, Wang S. et al. Multifaceted role of phyto-derived polyphenols in nanodrug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;176:113870. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cazzola M, Corazzari I, Prenesti E, Bertone E, Vernè E, Ferraris S. Bioactive glass coupling with natural polyphenols: Surface modification, bioactivity and anti-oxidant ability. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;367:237–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang X, Ferraris S, Prenesti E, Verné E. Surface functionalization of bioactive glasses with natural molecules of biological significance, part II: Grafting of polyphenols extracted from grape skin. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;287:341–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gülçin İ, Huyut Z, Elmastaş M, Aboul-Enein HY. Radical scavenging and antioxidant activity of tannic acid. Arab J Chem. 2010;3:43–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang Y, luo M, Li T, Xie C, Li S, Lei B. Multi-layer-structured bioactive glass nanopowder for multistage-stimulated hemostasis and wound repair. Bioact Mater. 2023;25:319–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chang H, Tian P, Hao L, Hu C, Liu B, Meng F. et al. Antioxidative bioactive glass reinforced injectable hydrogel with reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity for diabetic wounds treatment. Chem Eng J. 2024;481:148768. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Matter MT, Furer LA, Starsich FHL, Fortunato G, Pratsinis SE, Herrmann IK. Engineering the Bioactivity of Flame-Made Ceria and Ceria/Bioglass Hybrid Nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:2830–9. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b18778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nicolini V, Varini E, Malavasi G, Menabue L, Menziani MC, Lusvardi G. et al. The effect of composition on structural, thermal, redox and bioactive properties of Ce-containing glasses. Mater Des. 2016;97:73–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xu W, Qin Z, Xu R, Li S, Zheng K, Tan H. Injectable, pro-osteogenic and antioxidant composite microspheres composed of cerium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass and chitosan for bone regeneration applications. Ceram Int. 2023;49:25757–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.de Castro IA, Datta RS, Ou JZ, Castellanos-Gomez A, Sriram S, Daeneke T. et al. Molybdenum Oxides - From Fundamentals to Functionality. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1701619. doi: 10.1002/adma.201701619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Niu W, Chen M, Guo Y, Wang M, Luo M, Cheng W. et al. A Multifunctional Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Nanodrug for Post-Surgical Infection/Cancer Therapy-Tissue Regeneration. ACS Nano. 2021;15:14323–37. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lusvardi G, Fraulini F, D'Addato S, Zambon A. Loading with Biomolecules Modulates the Antioxidant Activity of Cerium-Doped Bioactive Glasses. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8:2890–8. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:363–83. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gagge AP, Stolwijk JAJ, Hardy JD. Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures. Environ Res. 1967;1:1–20. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(67)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pontremoli C, Boffito M, Laurano R, Iviglia G, Torre E, Cassinelli C. et al. Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Incorporated into an Injectable Thermosensitive Hydrogel for Sustained Co-Release of Sr2+ Ions and N-Acetylcysteine. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1890. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chen X, Zhao Y, Geng S, Miron RJ, Zhang Q, Wu C. et al. In vivo experimental study on bone regeneration in critical bone defects using PIB nanogels/boron-containing mesoporous bioactive glass composite scaffold. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:839–46. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S69001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jiang C, Sun G, Zhou Z, Bao Z, Lang X, Pang J. et al. Optimization of the preparation conditions of thermo-sensitive chitosan hydrogel in heterogeneous reaction using response surface methodology. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;121:293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Couto DS, Hong Z, Mano JF. Development of bioactive and biodegradable chitosan-based injectable systems containing bioactive glass nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:115–23. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wu J, Zheng K, Huang X, Liu J, Liu H, Boccaccini AldoR. et al. Thermally triggered injectable chitosan/silk fibroin/bioactive glass nanoparticle hydrogels for in-situ bone formation in rat calvarial bone defects. Acta Biomater. 2019;91:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Moreira CDF, Carvalho SM, Sousa RG, Mansur HS, Pereira MM. Nanostructured chitosan/gelatin/bioactive glass in situ forming hydrogel composites as a potential injectable matrix for bone tissue engineering. Mater Chem Phys. 2018;218:304–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Heintzman DR, Fisher EL, Rathmell JC. Microenvironmental influences on T cell immunity in cancer and inflammation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:316–26. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00833-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Repasky EA, Evans SS, Dewhirst MW. Temperature Matters!. And Why It Should Matter to Tumor Immunologists. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1:210–6. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Arsalan A, Younus H. Enzymes and nanoparticles: Modulation of enzymatic activity via nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;118:1833–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Polo L, Gómez-Cerezo N, García-Fernández A, Aznar E, Vivancos J-L, Arcos D. et al. Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Equipped with Stimuli-Responsive Molecular Gates for Controlled Delivery of Levofloxacin against Bacteria. Chem - Eur J. 2018;24:18944–51. doi: 10.1002/chem.201803301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Polo L, Gómez-Cerezo N, Aznar E, Vivancos J-L, Sancenón F, Arcos D. et al. Molecular gates in mesoporous bioactive glasses for the treatment of bone tumors and infection. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:114–26. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yu X, Gou X, Wu P, Han L, Tian D, Du F. et al. Activatable Protein Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery of Therapeutic Peptides. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1705383. doi: 10.1002/adma.201705383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yang Y, Yue C, Han Y, Zhang W, He A, Zhang C. et al. Tumor-Responsive Small Molecule Self-Assembled Nanosystem for Simultaneous Fluorescence Imaging and Chemotherapy of Lung Cancer. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:8735–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stubbs M, Aiston S, Agius L. Subcellular localization, mobility, and kinetic activity of glucokinase in glucose-responsive insulin-secreting cells. Diabetes. 2000;49:2048–55. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sui B, Zhao J, Ding T, Ruan M, Sun J, Liu X. Cell membrane camouflaged mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles embedding glucose oxidase for enhancing targeted anti-tumor catalytic therapy. Appl Mater Today. 2023;32:101813. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Li F, Lu J, Kong X, Hyeon T, Ling D. Dynamic Nanoparticle Assemblies for Biomedical Applications. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1605897. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Alejo T, Uson L, Arruebo M. Reversible stimuli-responsive nanomaterials with on-off switching ability for biomedical applications. J Controlled Release. 2019;314:162–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gelmi A, Schutt CE. Stimuli-Responsive Biomaterials: Scaffolds for Stem Cell Control. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:2001125. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202001125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhao S, Mehta AS, Zhao M. Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:2681–99. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03446-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ferrigno B, Bordett R, Duraisamy N, Moskow J, Arul MR, Rudraiah S. et al. Bioactive polymeric materials and electrical stimulation strategies for musculoskeletal tissue repair and regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2020;5:468–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mata D, Oliveira FJ, Neto MA, Belmonte M, Bastos AC, Lopes MA. et al. Smart electroconductive bioactive ceramics to promote in situ electrostimulation of bone. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:1831–45. doi: 10.1039/c4tb01628a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Obata A, Nakamura S, Yamashita K. Interpretation of electrical polarization and depolarization mechanisms of bioactive glasses in relation to ionic migration. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5163–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mariappan CR, Roling B. Mechanism and kinetics of Na ion depletion under the anode during electro-thermal poling of a bioactive glass+ J Non-Cryst Solids. 2010;356:720–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mariappan CR, Yunos DM, Boccaccini AR, Roling B. Bioactivity of electro-thermally poled bioactive silicate glass. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1274–83. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Meng D, Rath SN, Mordan N, Salih V, Kneser U, Boccaccini AR. In vitro evaluation of 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds coated with carbon nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;99A:435–44. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Misra SK, Ohashi F, Valappil SP, Knowles JC, Roy I, Silva SRP. et al. Characterization of carbon nanotube (MWCNT) containing P(3HB)/bioactive glass composites for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:735–42. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Rajabi AH, Jaffe M, Arinzeh TL. Piezoelectric materials for tissue regeneration: A review. Acta Biomater. 2015;24:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Li C, Zhang S, Yao Y, Wang Y, Xiao C, Yang B. et al. Piezoelectric Bioactive Glasses Composite Promotes Angiogenesis by the Synergistic Effect of Wireless Electrical Stimulation and Active Ions. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12:2300064. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhao F, Zhang C, Liu J, Liu L, Cao X, Chen X. et al. Periosteum structure/function-mimicking bioactive scaffolds with piezoelectric/chem/nano signals for critical-sized bone regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2020;402:126203. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Polley C, Distler T, Scheufler C, Detsch R, Lund H, Springer A. et al. 3D printing of piezoelectric and bioactive barium titanate-bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today Bio. 2023;21:100719. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Thévenot J, Oliveira H, Sandre O, Lecommandoux S. Magnetic responsive polymer composite materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:7099–116. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60058k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liu G, Gao J, Ai H, Chen X. Applications and Potential Toxicity of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Small. 2013;9:1533–45. doi: 10.1002/smll.201201531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tong S, Zhu H, Bao G. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for disease detection and therapy. Mater Today. 2019;31:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wang H, Zhao S, Zhou J, Zhu K, Cui X, Huang W. et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenic capacity of borosilicate bioactive glass scaffolds loaded with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:4377–87. doi: 10.1039/c5tb00062a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Li G, Feng S, Zhou D. Magnetic bioactive glass ceramic in the system CaO-P2O5-SiO2-MgO-CaF2-MnO2-Fe2O3 for hyperthermia treatment of bone tumor. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22:2197. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4417-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhu Y, Shang F, Li B, Dong Y, Liu Y, Lohe MR. et al. Magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds: preparation, physicochemistry and biological properties. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:1279–88. doi: 10.1039/c2tb00262k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Vergnaud F, Kesse X, Jacobs A, Perton F, Begin-Colin S, Mertz D. et al. Magnetic bioactive glass nano-heterostructures: a deeper insight into magnetic hyperthermia properties in the scope of bone cancer treatment. Biomater Sci. 2022;10:3993–4007. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00319h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lei Q, Chen Y, Gao S, Li J, Xiao L, Huang H. et al. Enhanced magnetothermal effect of high porous bioglass for both bone repair and antitumor therapy. Mater Des. 2023;227:111754. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yazdanpanah A, Moztarzadeh F. Synthesis and characterization of Barium-Iron containing magnetic bioactive glasses: The effect of magnetic component on structure and in vitro bioactivity. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;176:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Da Li G, Zhou DL, Lin Y, Pan TH, Chen GS, Yin QD. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic bioactive glass-ceramics containing Mg ferrite for hyperthermia. Mater Sci Eng C. 2010;30:148–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Borges R, Mendonça-Ferreira L, Rettori C, Pereira ISO, Baino F, Marchi J. New sol-gel-derived magnetic bioactive glass-ceramics containing superparamagnetic hematite nanocrystals for hyperthermia application. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;120:111692. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Li G, Zhang K, Pei Z, Zhang N, Yu Y, Zhao S. et al. A novel method to enhance magnetic property of bioactive glass-ceramics for hyperthermia. Ceram Int. 2019;45:4945–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Leenakul W, Ruangsuriya J, Jantaratana P, Pengpat K. Fabrication and characterization of ferrimagnetic bioactive glass-ceramic containing BaFe12O19. Ceram Int. 2013;39:S201–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Adedoyin AA, Ekenseair AK. Biomedical applications of magneto-responsive scaffolds. Nano Res. 2018;11:5049–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhu W, Li G, Ma X. et al. Comprehensive understanding of magnetic hyperthermia for improving antitumor therapeutic efficacy. Theranostics. 2020;10:3793–815. doi: 10.7150/thno.40805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ying W, Zhang Y, Gao W, Cai X, Wang G, Wu X. et al. Hollow Magnetic Nanocatalysts Drive Starvation-Chemodynamic-Hyperthermia Synergistic Therapy for Tumor. ACS Nano. 2020;14:9662–74. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Chang M, Hou Z, Wang M, Li C, Lin J. Recent Advances in Hyperthermia Therapy-Based Synergistic Immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2004788. doi: 10.1002/adma.202004788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kim KS, Kim J, Lee JY, Matsuda S, Hideshima S, Mori Y. et al. Stimuli-responsive magnetic nanoparticles for tumor-targeted bimodal imaging and photodynamic/hyperthermia combination therapy. Nanoscale. 2016;8:11625–34. doi: 10.1039/c6nr02273a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Kim S, Roe DG, Choi YY, Woo H, Park J, Lee JI. et al. Artificial stimulus-response system capable of conscious response. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabe3996. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe3996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Zheng Q, Xu C, Jiang Z, Zhu M, Chen C, Fu F. Smart Actuators Based on External Stimulus Response. Front Chem. 2021;9:650358. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.650358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Fernández M, Orozco J. Advances in Functionalized Photosensitive Polymeric Nanocarriers. Polymers. 2021;13:2464. doi: 10.3390/polym13152464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kopyshev A, Galvin CJ, Patil RR, Genzer J, Lomadze N, Feldmann D. et al. Light-Induced Reversible Change of Roughness and Thickness of Photosensitive Polymer Brushes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:19175–84. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b06881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Wang L, Long NJ, Li L, Lu Y, Li M, Cao J. et al. Multi-functional bismuth-doped bioglasses: combining bioactivity and photothermal response for bone tumor treatment and tissue repair. Light Sci Appl. 2018;7:1. doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0007-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.de Melo C, Jullien M, Battie Y, En Naciri A, Ghanbaja J, Montaigne F. et al. Tunable Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance and Broadband Visible Photoresponse of Cu Nanoparticles/ZnO Surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:40958–65. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b17194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Watanabe K, Menzel D, Nilius N, Freund H-J. Photochemistry on Metal Nanoparticles. Chem Rev. 2006;106:4301–20. doi: 10.1021/cr050167g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Liu Y, Li T, Ma H, Zhai D, Deng C, Wang J. et al. 3D-printed scaffolds with bioactive elements-induced photothermal effect for bone tumor therapy. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:531–46. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Du J, Ding H, Fu S, Li D, Yu B. Bismuth-coated 80S15C bioactive glass scaffolds for photothermal antitumor therapy and bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;10:1098923. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1098923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kargozar S, Mozafari M, Ghodrat S, Fiume E, Baino F. Copper-containing bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics: From tissue regeneration to cancer therapeutic strategies. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;121:111741. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Wang H, Zeng X, Pang L, Wang H, Lin B, Deng Z. et al. Integrative treatment of anti-tumor/bone repair by combination of MoS2 nanosheets with 3D printed bioactive borosilicate glass scaffolds. Chem Eng J. 2020;396:125081. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Jayalekshmi AC, Sharma CP. Gold nanoparticle incorporated polymer/bioactive glass composite for controlled drug delivery application. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;126:280–7. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Yin J, Pan S, Guo X, Gao Y, Zhu D, Yang Q. et al. Nb2C MXene-Functionalized Scaffolds Enables Osteosarcoma Phototherapy and Angiogenesis/Osteogenesis of Bone Defects. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13:30. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00547-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Liu S, Han Z, Hao J-N, Zhang D, Li X, Cao Y. et al. Engineering of a NIR-activable hydrogel-coated mesoporous bioactive glass scaffold with dual-mode parathyroid hormone derivative release property for angiogenesis and bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2023;26:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Dang W, Li T, Li B. et al. A bifunctional scaffold with CuFeSe2 nanocrystals for tumor therapy and bone reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2018;160:92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sun B, Findikoglu AT, Sykora M, Werder DJ, Klimov VI. Hybrid Photovoltaics Based on Semiconductor Nanocrystals and Amorphous Silicon. Nano Lett. 2009;9:1235–41. doi: 10.1021/nl9001469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Lin H-M, Wang W-K, Hsiung P-A, Shyu S-G. Light-sensitive intelligent drug delivery systems of coumarin-modified mesoporous bioactive glass. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3256–63. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Xiang H, Yang Q, Gao Y, Zhu D, Pan S, Xu T. et al. Cocrystal Strategy toward Multifunctional 3D-Printing Scaffolds Enables NIR-Activated Photonic Osteosarcoma Hyperthermia and Enhanced Bone Defect Regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1909938. [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Dang W, Jin Y, Yi K, Ju E, Zhuo C, Wei H. et al. Hemin particles-functionalized 3D printed scaffolds for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Chem Eng J. 2021;422:129919. [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Su X, Lyu Z, Wu Y, Gu Y-H, Huo S, Zhou C. Strontium-doped bioactive glass/PDA functionalized polyetheretherketone with immunomodulatory property for enhancing photothermal clearance of Staphylococcus aureus. Mater Des. 2023;225:111552. [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Xue Y, Niu W, Wang M, Chen M, Guo Y, Lei B. Engineering a Biodegradable Multifunctional Antibacterial Bioactive Nanosystem for Enhancing Tumor Photothermo-Chemotherapy and Bone Regeneration. ACS Nano. 2020;14:442–53. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b06145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Zhou L, Xi Y, Xue Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Guo Y. et al. Injectable Self-Healing Antibacterial Bioactive Polypeptide-Based Hybrid Nanosystems for Efficiently Treating Multidrug Resistant Infection, Skin-Tumor Therapy, and Enhancing Wound Healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1806883. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kumar R, Nyk M, Ohulchanskyy TY, Flask CA, Prasad PN. Combined Optical and MR Bioimaging Using Rare Earth Ion Doped NaYF4 Nanocrystals. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19:853–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Escudero A, Becerro AI, Carrillo-Carrión C, Núñez NO, Zyuzin MV, Laguna M. et al. Rare earth based nanostructured materials: synthesis, functionalization, properties and bioimaging and biosensing applications. Nanophotonics. 2017;6:881–921. [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hemmer E, Venkatachalam N, Hyodo H, Hattori A, Ebina Y, Kishimoto H. et al. Upconverting and NIR emitting rare earth based nanostructures for NIR-bioimaging. Nanoscale. 2013;5:11339–61. doi: 10.1039/c3nr02286b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ma L, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Zhai D, Zhuang H. et al. Multifunctional bioactive Nd-Ca-Si glasses for fluorescence thermometry, photothermal therapy, and burn tissue repair. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabb1311. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Huang WM, Song CL, Fu YQ, Wang CC, Zhao Y, Purnawali H. et al. Shaping tissue with shape memory materials. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:515–35. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Sun L, Huang WM, Ding Z, Zhao Y, Wang CC, Purnawali H. et al. Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: A review. Mater Des. 2012;33:577–640. [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Liverani L, Liguori A, Zezza P, Gualandi C, Toselli M, Boccaccini AR. et al. Nanocomposite electrospun fibers of poly(ε-caprolactone)/bioactive glass with shape memory properties. Bioact Mater. 2022;11:230–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Leite ÁJ, Caridade SG, Mano JF. Synthesis and characterization of bioactive biodegradable chitosan composite spheres with shape memory capability. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2016;432:158–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Correia CO, Leite ÁJ, Mano JF. Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticles scaffolds with shape memory properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;123:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Wang L, Qiu Y, Guo Y, Si Y, Liu L, Cao J. et al. Smart, Elastic, and Nanofiber-Based 3D Scaffolds with Self-Deploying Capability for Osteoporotic Bone Regeneration. Nano Lett. 2019;19:9112–20. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Yao L, Gao H, Lin Z, Dai Q, Zhu S, Li S. et al. A shape memory and antibacterial cryogel with rapid hemostasis for noncompressible hemorrhage and wound healing. Chem Eng J. 2022;428:131005. [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zhao F, Yang Z, Xiong H, Yan Y, Chen X, Shao L. A bioactive glass functional hydrogel enhances bone augmentation via synergistic angiogenesis, self-swelling and osteogenesis. Bioact Mater. 2023;22:201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Miao S, Castro N, Nowicki M, Xia L, Cui H, Zhou X. et al. 4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Today. 2017;20:577–91. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Verma AS, Singh A, Kumar D, Dubey AK. Electro-mechanical and Polarization-Induced Antibacterial Response of 45S5 Bioglass-Sodium Potassium Niobate Piezoelectric Ceramic Composites. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:3055–69. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Verma AS, Kumar D, Dubey AK. Antibacterial and cellular response of piezoelectric Na0.5K0.5NbO3modified 1393 bioactive glass. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;116:111138. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Zhang X, Wei H, Dong C, Wang J, Zhang T, Huang L. et al. 3D printed hydrogel/bioceramics core/shell scaffold with NIR-II triggered drug release for chemo-photothermal therapy of bone tumors and enhanced bone repair. Chem Eng J. 2023;461:141855. [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Miguez-Pacheco V, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glasses beyond bone and teeth: Emerging applications in contact with soft tissues. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Jia W, Lau GY, Huang W, Zhang C, Tomsia AP, Fu Q. Bioactive Glass for Large Bone Repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:2842–8. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Liao J, Han R, Wu Y, Qian Z. Review of a new bone tumor therapy strategy based on bifunctional biomaterials. Bone Res. 2021;9:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41413-021-00139-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Feng L, Dong Z, Tao D, Zhang Y, Liu Z. The acidic tumor microenvironment: a target for smart cancer nano-theranostics. Natl Sci Rev. 2018;5:269–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Zhang Y, Wang X, Su Y, Chen D, Zhong W. A doxorubicin delivery system: Samarium/mesoporous bioactive glass/alginate composite microspheres. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;67:205–13. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Mehnath S, Karthikeyan K, Rajan M, Jeyaraj M. Fabrication of bone-targeting hyaluronic acid coupled alendronate-bioactive glass for osteosarcoma therapy. Mater Chem Phys. 2021;273:125146. [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhou Y. Erbium-ytterbium containing upconversion mesoporous bioactive glass microspheres for tissue engineering: luminescence monitoring of biomineralization and drug release. Acta Biomater. 2023;168:628–36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Lei P, Feng J, Zhang H. Emerging biomaterials: Taking full advantage of the intrinsic properties of rare earth elements. Nano Today. 2020;35:100952. [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Tan G-R, Wang M, Hsu C-Y, Chen N, Zhang Y. Small Upconverting Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Biosensing and Bioimaging. Adv Opt Mater. 2016;4:984–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Zhang Y. Luminescence biomonitoring and antibacterial properties of Er3+-doped SiO2-CaO-P2O5 bioactive glass microspheres. Ceram Int. 2023;49:22924–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Xue Y, Du Y, Yan J, Liu Z, Ma PX, Chen X. et al. Monodisperse photoluminescent and highly biocompatible bioactive glass nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery and cell imaging. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:3831–9. doi: 10.1039/c5tb00204d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Wang F, Zhai D, Wu C, Chang J. Multifunctional mesoporous bioactive glass/upconversion nanoparticle nanocomposites with strong red emission to monitor drug delivery and stimulate osteogenic differentiation of stem cells. Nano Res. 2016;9:1193–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Chen M, Wang M, Niu W, Cheng W, Guo Y, Wang Y. et al. Multifunctional Protein-Decorated Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles for Tumor-Specific Therapy and Bioimaging In Vitro and In Vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:14985–94. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Qin X, Wu C, Niu D, Qin L, Wang X, Wang Q. et al. Peroxisome inspired hybrid enzyme nanogels for chemodynamic and photodynamic therapy. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5243. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25561-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Huang L, Zhao S, Wu J, Yu L, Singh N, Yang K. et al. Photodynamic therapy for hypoxic tumors: Advances and perspectives. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;438:213888. [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Pang L, Zhao R, Chen J, Ding J, Chen X, Chai W. et al. Osteogenic and anti-tumor Cu and Mn-doped borosilicate nanoparticles for syncretic bone repair and chemodynamic therapy in bone tumor treatment. Bioact Mater. 2022;12:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Huang R, Ni N, Gu L, Su Y, Ju Y, Zhang D. et al. Chargeable persistent luminescence 3D-printed scaffolds: A stepwise tactic for osteosarcoma treatment. Chem Eng J. 2024;479:147436. [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Huang Z, Tian Z, Zhu M, Wu C, Zhu Y. Recent Advances in Biomaterial Scaffolds for Integrative Tumor Therapy and Bone Regeneration. Adv Ther. 2021;4:2000212. [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Gao X, Li L, Cai X, Huang Q, Xiao J, Cheng Y. Targeting nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy of bone tumors: Opportunities and challenges. Biomaterials. 2021;265:120404. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Yang Z, Zhao F, Zhang W, Yang Z, Luo M, Liu L. et al. Degradable photothermal bioactive glass composite hydrogel for the sequential treatment of tumor-related bone defects: From anti-tumor to repairing bone defects. Chem Eng J. 2021;419:129520. [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Liu Y, Lin R, Ma L, Zhuang H, Feng C, Chang J. et al. Mesoporous bioactive glass for synergistic therapy of tumor and regeneration of bone tissue. Appl Mater Today. 2020;19:100578. [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Liang B, Zuo D, Yu K, Cai X, Qiao B, Deng R. et al. Multifunctional bone cement for synergistic magnetic hyperthermia ablation and chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;108:110460. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Danewalia SS, Singh K. Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics for hyperthermia treatment of cancer: state-of-art, challenges, and future perspectives. Mater Today Bio. 2021;10:100100. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Wei H, Cui J, Lin K, Xie J, Wang X. Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration. Bone Res. 2022;10:1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41413-021-00180-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Han X, Yi W, Chen S, Cai Z, Zhu Y, Han W. et al. Ultrasound-responsive smart composite biomaterials in tissue repair. Nano Today. 2023;49:101804. [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Levingstone T, Ali B, Kearney C, Dunne N. Hydroxyapatite sonosensitization of ultrasound-triggered, thermally responsive hydrogels: An on-demand delivery system for bone repair applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021;109:1622–33. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Osminkina LA, Nikolaev AL, Sviridov AP, Andronova NV, Tamarov KP, Gongalsky MB. et al. Porous silicon nanoparticles as efficient sensitizers for sonodynamic therapy of cancer. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015;210:169–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Villanueva J, Herlyn M. Melanoma and the tumor microenvironment. Curr Oncol Rep. 2008;10:439–46. doi: 10.1007/s11912-008-0067-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Umansky V, Sevko A. Overcoming immunosuppression in the melanoma microenvironment induced by chronic inflammation. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61:275–82. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1164-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Marzagalli M, Ebelt ND, Manuel ER. Unraveling the crosstalk between melanoma and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;59:236–50. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Yuan C, Zhang D, Tang Y, Guo Z, Lin K, Yu Y. et al. Fibrous dressing containing bioactive glass with combined chemotherapy and wound healing promotion for post-surgical treatment of melanoma. Biomater Adv. 2023;149:213387. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Zhao X, Lang Q, Yildirimer L, Lin ZY, Cui W, Annabi N. et al. Photocrosslinkable Gelatin Hydrogel for Epidermal Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:108–18. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Liu X, Shen M, Bing T, Zhang X, Li Y, Cai Q. et al. A Bioactive Injectable Hydrogel Regulates Tumor Metastasis and Wound Healing for Melanoma via NIR-Light Triggered Hyperthermia. Adv. Sci. 2024;11:e2402208. doi: 10.1002/advs.202402208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Huang H, Wang X, Wang W, Qu X, Song X, Zhang Y. et al. Injectable hydrogel for postoperative synergistic photothermal-chemodynamic tumor and anti-infection therapy. Biomaterials. 2022;280:121289. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Chen M, Winston DD, Wang M, Niu W, Cheng W, Guo Y. et al. Hierarchically multifunctional bioactive nanoglass for integrated tumor/infection therapy and impaired wound repair. Mater Today. 2022;53:27–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 196.del Rosal B, Carrasco E, Ren F, Benayas A, Vetrone F, Sanz-Rodríguez F. et al. Infrared-Emitting QDs for Thermal Therapy with Real-Time Subcutaneous Temperature Feedback. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:6060–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Ashrafizadeh M, Zarrabi A, Bigham A, Taheriazam A, Saghari Y, Mirzaei S. et al. (Nano)platforms in breast cancer therapy: Drug/gene delivery, advanced nanocarriers and immunotherapy. Med Res Rev. 2023;43:2115–76. doi: 10.1002/med.21971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Zhu L, Zhong Y, Wu S, Yan M, Cao Y, Mou N. et al. Cell membrane camouflaged biomimetic nanoparticles: Focusing on tumor theranostics. Mater Today Bio. 2022;14:100228. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Xu C-H, Ye P-J, Zhou Y-C, He D-X, Wei H, Yu C-Y. Cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles as drug carriers for cancer therapy. Acta Biomater. 2020;105:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Dhas N, García MC, Kudarha R, Pandey A, Nikam AN, Gopalan D. et al. Advancements in cell membrane camouflaged nanoparticles: A bioinspired platform for cancer therapy. J Controlled Release. 2022;346:71–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Zhang J, Sun Y, Ren L, Chen L, Nie L, Shavandi A. et al. Red Blood Cell Membrane-Camouflaged Polydopamine and Bioactive Glass Composite Nanoformulation for Combined Chemo/Chemodynamic/Photothermal Therapy. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;10(1):442–454. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Liang Y, Zhang H, Song X, Yang Q. Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer: Molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;60:14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Wang S, Wu W, Lin X, Zhang KM, Wu Q, Luo M. et al. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers of bone metastasis in breast cancer: current status and future directions. Cell Biosci. 2023;13:224. doi: 10.1186/s13578-023-01171-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.He C, Yu L, Yao H, Chen Y, Hao Y. Combinatorial Photothermal 3D-Printing Scaffold and Checkpoint Blockade Inhibits Growth/Metastasis of Breast Cancer to Bone and Accelerates Osteogenesis. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31:2006214. [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Lin B, Chen H, Liang D, Lin W, Qi X, Liu H. et al. Acidic pH and High-H2O2 Dual Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Nanocatalytic Graphene Oxide for Cancer Selective Therapy and Recognition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:11157–66. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b22487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Wang X, Zhong X, Liu Z, Cheng L. Recent progress of chemodynamic therapy-induced combination cancer therapy. Nano Today. 2020;35:100946. [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Han Y-H, Liu C-G, Chen B-Q, Fu C-P, Kankala RK, Wang S-B. et al. Orchestrated tumor apoptosis (Cu2+) and bone tissue calcification (Ca2+) by hierarchical Copper/Calcium-ensembled bioactive silica for osteosarcoma therapy. Chem Eng J. 2022;435:134820. [Google Scholar]
  • 208.El-Fiqi A, Kim H-W. Iron ions-releasing mesoporous bioactive glass ultrasmall nanoparticles designed as ferroptosis-based bone cancer nanotherapeutics: Ultrasonic-coupled sol-gel synthesis, properties and iron ions release. Mater Lett. 2021;294:129759. [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Lu S, Li Y, Yu Y. Glutathione-Scavenging Celastrol-Cu Nanoparticles Induce Self-Amplified Cuproptosis for Augmented Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2024;36:2404971. doi: 10.1002/adma.202404971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Patel A, Sant S. Hypoxic tumor microenvironment: Opportunities to develop targeted therapies. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:803–12. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Petrova V, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Melino G, Amelio I. The hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Oncogenesis. 2018;7:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41389-017-0011-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Xie Z, Guo W, Guo N, Huangfu M, Liu H, Lin M. et al. Targeting tumor hypoxia with stimulus-responsive nanocarriers in overcoming drug resistance and monitoring anticancer efficacy. Acta Biomater. 2018;71:351–62. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Perche F, Biswas S, Wang T, Zhu L, Torchilin VP. Hypoxia-Targeted siRNA Delivery. Angew Chem. 2014;126:3430–4. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.He H, Zhu R, Sun W, Cai K, Chen Y, Yin L. Selective cancer treatment via photodynamic sensitization of hypoxia-responsive drug delivery. Nanoscale. 2018;10:2856–65. doi: 10.1039/c7nr07677k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Li Y, Wang J, Tang Y, Lu S, Lv Y, Li W. et al. Stimuli-responsive ultra-small vanadate prodrug nanoparticles with NIR photothermal properties to precisely inhibit Na/K-ATPase for enhanced cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2023;15:9116–22. doi: 10.1039/d2nr07117g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Zimmerli W. Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection. J Intern Med. 2014;276:111–9. doi: 10.1111/joim.12233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Inzana JA, Schwarz EM, Kates SL, Awad HA. Biomaterials approaches to treating implant-associated osteomyelitis. Biomaterials. 2016;81:58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Dréno B, Dagnelie MA, Khammari A, Corvec S. The Skin Microbiome: A New Actor in Inflammatory Acne. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:18–24. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00531-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Ptasiewicz M, Grywalska E, Mertowska P, Korona-Głowniak I, Poniewierska-Baran A, Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej P. et al. Armed to the Teeth-The Oral Mucosa Immunity System and Microbiota. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:882. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Mark Welch JL, Ramírez-Puebla ST, Borisy GG. Oral Microbiome Geography: Micron-Scale Habitat and Niche. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:160–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Joseph S, Curtis MA. Microbial transitions from health to disease. Periodontol 2000. 2021;86:201–9. doi: 10.1111/prd.12377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Besinis A, De Peralta T, Tredwin CJ, Handy RD. Review of Nanomaterials in Dentistry: Interactions with the Oral Microenvironment, Clinical Applications, Hazards, and Benefits. ACS Nano. 2015;9:2255–89. doi: 10.1021/nn505015e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Yu K, Zhang Q, Dai Z, Zhu M, Xiao L, Zhao Z. et al. Smart Dental Materials Intelligently Responding to Oral pH to Combat Caries: A Literature Review. Polymers. 2023;15:2611. doi: 10.3390/polym15122611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.He Y, Vasilev K, Zilm P. pH-Responsive Biomaterials for the Treatment of Dental Caries-A Focussed and Critical Review. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1837. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Lu J, Liu Z, Wang K, Gu M, Peng X, Zhang Y. et al. Odontogenesis by Endocytosis of Peptide Embedding Bioactive Glass Composite. J Dent Res. 2022;101:1055–63. doi: 10.1177/00220345221085186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Irshad N, Jahanzeb N, Alqasim A, Bousaleh R, Almehrij M, Ghafoor S. et al. Synthesis and analyses of injectable fluoridated-bioactive glass hydrogel for dental root canal sealing. PLOS ONE. 2023;18:e0294446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Malik Q ul A, Iftikhar S, Zahid S, Safi SZ, Khan AF, Nawshad M. et al. Smart injectable self-setting bioceramics for dental applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;113:110956. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Woo HN, Cho YJ, Tarafder S, Lee CH. The recent advances in scaffolds for integrated periodontal regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6:3328–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Takallu S, Mirzaei E, Zakeri Bazmandeh A, Ghaderi Jafarbeigloo HR, Khorshidi H. Addressing Antimicrobial Properties in Guided Tissue/Bone Regeneration Membrane: Enhancing Effectiveness in Periodontitis Treatment. ACS Infect Dis. 2024;10:779–807. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Hu Z, Lv X, Zhang H, Zhuang S, Zheng K, Zhou T. et al. An injectable gel based on photo-cross-linkable hyaluronic acid and mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for periodontitis treatment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;257:128596. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín I, Ortiz-Vigón A, Molina A, Sanz M. Complications in bone-grafting procedures: Classification and management. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88:86–102. doi: 10.1111/prd.12413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Ghimire A, Song J. Anti-Periprosthetic Infection Strategies: From Implant Surface Topographical Engineering to Smart Drug-Releasing Coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:20921–37. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Depypere M, Morgenstern M, Kuehl R, Senneville E, Moriarty TF, Obremskey WT. et al. Pathogenesis and management of fracture-related infection. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;26:572–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Zarghami V, Ghorbani M, Bagheri KP, Shokrgozar MA. In vitro bactericidal and drug release properties of vancomycin-amino surface functionalized bioactive glass nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;241:122423. [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Lv X, Zhang J, Yang D, Shao J, Wang W, Zhang Q. et al. Recent advances in pH-responsive nanomaterials for anti-infective therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:10700–11. doi: 10.1039/d0tb02177f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Zhang R, Ding J, Lu X, Yao A, Wang D. pH-responsive drug release and antibacterial activity of chitosan-coated core/shell borate glass-hydroxyapatite microspheres. Ceram Int. 2023;49:5161–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Han L, Huang Z, Zhu M, Zhu Y, Li H. Drug-loaded zeolite imidazole framework-8-functionalized bioglass scaffolds with antibacterial activity for bone repair. Ceram Int. 2022;48:6890–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Li R, Chen T, Lu J, Hu H, Zheng H, Zhu P. et al. Metal-organic frameworks doped with metal ions for efficient sterilization: Enhanced photocatalytic activity and photothermal effect. Water Res. 2023;229:119366. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Xu J-W, Yao K, Xu Z-K. Nanomaterials with a photothermal effect for antibacterial activities: an overview. Nanoscale. 2019;11:8680–91. doi: 10.1039/c9nr01833f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Wang C, Chen Q, Yin R, Yuan X, Kang H, Cai A. et al. Photothermal effect and antimicrobial properties of cerium-doped bioactive glasses. Ceram Int. 2024;50:20235–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Maleki A, He J, Bochani S, Nosrati V, Shahbazi M-A, Guo B. Multifunctional Photoactive Hydrogels for Wound Healing Acceleration. ACS Nano. 2021;15:18895–930. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c08334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Hou Q, Liu K, Lian C, Liu J, Wei W, Qiu T. et al. A Gelatin-Based Composite Hydrogel with a “One Stone, Two Birds” Strategy for Photothermal Antibacterial and Vascularization of Infected Wounds. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:3397–410. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Rauf A, Ye J, Zhang S, Qi Y, Wang G, Che Y. et al. Copper(II)-based coordination polymer nanofibers as a highly effective antibacterial material with a synergistic mechanism. Dalton Trans. 2019;48:17810–7. doi: 10.1039/c9dt03649k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Li T, Wang Y, Lei B. Photothermal-antibacterial bioactive noncrystalline nanosystem promotes infected wound tissue regeneration through thermo-ions activation. Chem Eng J. 2024;491:151799. [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Zhang M, Fan Z, Zhang J, Yang Y, Huang C, Zhang W. et al. Multifunctional chitosan/alginate hydrogel incorporated with bioactive glass nanocomposites enabling photothermal and nitric oxide release activities for bacteria-infected wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;232:123445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Qu L, Yang L, Ren Y, Ren X, Fan D, Xu K. et al. A signal-off electrochemical sensing platform based on Fe3S4-Pd and pineal mesoporous bioactive glass for procalcitonin detection. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2020;320:128324. [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Mandakhbayar N, Ji Y, El-Fiqi A, Patel KD, Yoon DS, Dashnyam K. et al. Double hits with bioactive nanozyme based on cobalt-doped nanoglass for acute and diabetic wound therapies through anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic functions. Bioact Mater. 2024;31:298–311. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Zhang Y, Hu M, Zhang W, Zhang X. Construction of tellurium-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for bone cancer therapy by promoting ROS-mediated apoptosis and antibacterial activity. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;610:719–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Tian P, Zhao L, Kim J, Li X, Liu C, Cui X. et al. Dual stimulus responsive borosilicate glass (BSG) scaffolds promote diabetic alveolar bone defectsrepair by modulating macrophage phenotype. Bioact Mater. 2023;26:231–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Zhao H, Huang J, Li Y, Lv X, Zhou H, Wang H. et al. ROS-scavenging hydrogel to promote healing of bacteria infected diabetic wounds. Biomaterials. 2020;258:120286. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Wang W, Zheng J, Hong X, Zhou J, Xiong Y, Yang H. et al. Micro-environment triple-responsive hyaluronic acid hydrogel dressings to promote antibacterial activity, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis for diabetic wound healing. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12:4613–28. doi: 10.1039/d4tb00261j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Li H, Li B, Lv D, Li W, Lu Y, Luo G. Biomaterials releasing drug responsively to promote wound healing via regulation of pathological microenvironment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;196:114778. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Xu B, Cao Q, Zhang Y, Yu W, Zhu J, Liu D. et al. Microneedles Integrated with ZnO Quantum-Dot-Capped Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses for Glucose-Mediated Insulin Delivery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4:2473–83. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Jiang G, Xu B, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Liu T, Song G. Polymer microneedles integrated with glucose-responsive mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for transdermal delivery of insulin. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2019;5:045038. [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Xing C, Zhu H, Dou X, Gao L, Baddi S, Zou Y. et al. Infected Diabetic Wound Regeneration Using Peptide-Modified Chiral Dressing to Target Revascularization. ACS Nano. 2023;17:6275–91. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c10039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Zhang S, Ge G, Qin Y, Li W, Dong J, Mei J. et al. Recent advances in responsive hydrogels for diabetic wound healing. Mater Today Bio. 2023;18:100508. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Moura J, Madureira P, Leal EC, Fonseca AC, Carvalho E. Immune aging in diabetes and its implications in wound healing. Clin Immunol Orlando Fla. 2019;200:43–54. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Louiselle AE, Niemiec SM, Zgheib C, Liechty KW. Macrophage polarization and diabetic wound healing. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med. 2021;236:109–16. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Daryabor G, Atashzar MR, Kabelitz D, Meri S, Kalantar K. The Effects of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Organ Metabolism and the Immune System. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1582. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Zeng H, Ying Z-R, Luo X, Tan S, Liu X-H, Zhao X-Y. et al. Gallic acid-modified bioglass with combined photothermal and antibacterial effects for the regeneration of infected diabetic wound. Compos Part B Eng. 2023;257:110668. [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Zhu S, Li M, Wang Z, Feng Q, Gao H, Li Q. et al. Bioactive Glasses-Based Nanozymes Composite Macroporous Cryogel with Antioxidative, Antibacterial, and Pro-Healing Properties for Diabetic Infected Wound Repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(29):e2302073. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202302073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Kocher T, König J, Borgnakke WS, Pink C, Meisel P. Periodontal complications of hyperglycemia/diabetes mellitus: Epidemiologic complexity and clinical challenge. Periodontol 2000. 2018;78:59–97. doi: 10.1111/prd.12235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Xu Z, Qi X, Bao M, Zhou T, Shi J, Xu Z. et al. Biomineralization inspired 3D printed bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds orchestrate diabetic bone regeneration by remodeling micromilieu. Bioact Mater. 2023;25:239–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.01.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Wu Z, Bai J, Ge G, Wang T, Feng S, Ma Q. et al. Regulating Macrophage Polarization in High Glucose Microenvironment Using Lithium-Modified Bioglass-Hydrogel for Diabetic Bone Regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11:2200298. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Knight ET, Liu J, Seymour GJ, Faggion CM, Cullinan MP. Risk factors that may modify the innate and adaptive immune responses in periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2016;71:22–51. doi: 10.1111/prd.12110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Chen Y, Chen L, Wang Y, Lin K, Liu J. Lithium-containing bioactive glasses enhanced 3D-printed PLGA scaffolds for bone regeneration in diabetes. Compos Part B Eng. 2022;230:109550. [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Hickman DA, Pawlowski CL, Sekhon UDS, Marks J, Gupta AS. Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1700859. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Dong R, Zhang H, Guo B. Emerging hemostatic materials for non-compressible hemorrhage control. Natl Sci Rev. 2022;9:nwac162. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Curry N, Hopewell S, Dorée C, Hyde C, Brohi K, Stanworth S. The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2011;15:R92. doi: 10.1186/cc10096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Lu X, Liu Z, Jia Q, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Li X. et al. Flexible Bioactive Glass Nanofiber-Based Self-Expanding Cryogels with Superelasticity and Bioadhesion Enabling Hemostasis and Wound Healing. ACS Nano. 2023;17:11507–20. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c01370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Zhu Y, Wang Y, Xia G, Zhang X, Deng S, Zhao X. et al. Oral Delivery of Bioactive Glass-Loaded Core-Shell Hydrogel Microspheres for Effective Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Sci. 2023;10:2207418. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Park KC, Gaze DC, Collinson PO, Marber MS. Cardiac troponins: from myocardial infarction to chronic disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113:1708–18. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Ellahham S. Artificial Intelligence: The Future for Diabetes Care. Am J Med. 2020;133:895–900. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Bidart JM, Thuillier F, Augereau C, Chalas J, Daver A, Jacob N. et al. Kinetics of serum tumor marker concentrations and usefulness in clinical monitoring. Clin Chem. 1999;45:1695–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Janse van Rensburg HJ, Spiliopoulou P, Siu LL. Circulating Biomarkers for Therapeutic Monitoring of Anti-cancer Agents. The Oncologist. 2022;27:352–62. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Lui YS, Sow WT, Tan LP, Wu Y, Lai Y, Li H. 4D printing and stimuli-responsive materials in biomedical aspects. Acta Biomater. 2019;92:19–36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Qu M, Wang C, Zhou X, Libanori A, Jiang X, Xu W. et al. Multi-Dimensional Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:e2001986. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202001986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Miri AK, Khalilpour A, Cecen B, Maharjan S, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A. Multiscale bioprinting of vascularized models. Biomaterials. 2019;198:204–16. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Li Y-C, Zhang YS, Akpek A, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A. 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials. Biofabrication. 2016;9:012001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/012001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Wang Y, Cui H, Esworthy T, Mei D, Wang Y, Zhang LG. Emerging 4D Printing Strategies for Next-Generation Tissue Regeneration and Medical Devices. Adv Mater. 2022;34:2109198. doi: 10.1002/adma.202109198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Joshi S, Rawat K, C K, Rajamohan V, Mathew AT, Koziol K. et al. 4D printing of materials for the future: Opportunities and challenges. Appl Mater Today. 2020;18:100490. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Theranostics are provided here courtesy of Ivyspring International Publisher

RESOURCES