Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genome Biology and Evolution logoLink to Genome Biology and Evolution
. 2025 Jan 10;17(1):evaf003. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf003

Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genome Assemblies for the Endangered Wood-Decaying Fungus Somion occarium

Rowena Hill 1,✉,b, Jamie McGowan 2,b, Vendula Brabcová 3, Seanna McTaggart 4, Naomi Irish 5, Tom Barker 6, Vanda Knitlhoffer 7, Sacha Lucchini 8, Kendall Baker 9, Leah Catchpole 10, Chris Watkins 11, Karim Gharbi 12, Gemy Kaithakottil 13, Alan Tracey 14, Jonathan M D Wood 15, Michal Tomšovský 16, Petr Baldrian 17, David Swarbreck 18, Neil Hall 19,20
Editor: Li-Jun Ma
PMCID: PMC11783313  PMID: 39791427

Abstract

Somion occarium is a wood-decaying bracket fungus belonging to an order known to be rich in useful chemical compounds. Despite its widespread distribution, S. occarium has been assessed as endangered on at least 1 national Red List, presumably due to loss of old-growth forest habitat. Here, we present a near-complete, annotated nuclear genome assembly for S. occarium consisting of 31 Mbp arranged in 11 pseudochromosomes—9 of which are telomere-to-telomere—as well as a complete mitochondrial genome assembly of 112.9 Kbp. We additionally performed phylogenomic analysis and annotated carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) to compare gene and CAZyme content across closely related species. This genome was sequenced as the representative for Kingdom Fungi in the European Reference Genome Atlas Pilot Project.

Keywords: saprotroph, white-rot, cerrenaceae, polyporales, fungal conservation

Significance.

Wood-decaying fungi are not only the foundation of nutrient cycling in our forests, but also known to produce many medically relevant chemical compounds. As Somion occarium is also endangered in at least 1 country, it is doubly important to produce high-quality genomic resources to facilitate study of this species. The sole fungal representative sequenced as part of the European Reference Genome Atlas (ERGA) Pilot Project, this genome assembly leads the way for future sequencing efforts of fungi within ERGA.

Introduction

The species Somion occarium (Cerrenaceae, Polyporales, Basidiomycota) is a bracket fungus and polypore (Fig. 1a), both of which are polyphyletic groupings based on growth form rather than ancestry. Usually found on dead wood of hardwood trees—including oaks (Quercus spp.) and beech (Fagus spp.) (GBIF 2024)—S. occarium is predominantly a white-rot decayer, or saprotroph. Its occasional presence on living trees suggests it is also capable of facultative parasitic growth, similar to other species in the Cerrenaceae (Hallenberg et al. 2008; Justo et al. 2017). In addition to wood, the fungus has also occasionally been recorded from soil DNA metabarcoding (Větrovský et al. 2020). Such wood-decaying fungi are essential for carbon and nutrient cycling and the formation and stabilization of soil aggregates in forest ecosystems (Miller and Lodge 2007).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

a) Photograph of a S. occarium specimen from the same locality as the strain sequenced in this study, taken in 2018. b) A representation of the assembled pseudo-chromosomal contigs, with red bars at each end indicating predicted telomeres. c) The assembled and annotated mitogenome. d) Synteny between S. occarium gfSpoDele1 and L. sulphureus gfLaeSulp1. e) Comparison of gene content between S. occarium and closely related Polyporales species, with an emphasis on CAZymes. Known substrates are only shown for CAZyme genes with no contradictory substrate predictions by run_dbcan.

Somion occarium belongs to the order Polyporales, which contains many, but not all, of the polypore species. Polypores are iconic in forest ecosystems, and have long been culturally valued, including a rich history of their use in folk medicine (Grienke et al. 2014). Fittingly, the Polyporales are some of the highest known producers of bioactive compounds within fungi, including antibacterials, antifungals, and drugs or drug leads (Prescott et al. 2023). Generating genomic data for species in the order provides the groundwork to support further discovery of potentially useful compounds.

The Earth BioGenome Project (EBP) is an ambitious initiative to sequence reference genomes for all eukaryotic species (Lewin et al. 2018). The European Reference Genome Atlas (ERGA) is the European node of EBP, and has coordinated a pilot project to establish and test a decentralized infrastructure to deliver the EBP’s aspirations (Mc Cartney et al. 2024), for which S. occarium was selected as a representative for fungi. Somion occarium was previously known as Spongipellis delectans (or the synonym Hydnum occarium), but recent division of Spongipellis sensu lato into several genera following DNA-based and morphological revision saw the restoration of the suppressed older genus name Somion for the Sp. delectans complex (Miettinen et al. 2023). North American Sp. delectans is now Somion delectans, while European Sp. delectans is S. occarium. There is 1 existing assembly for the Cerrenaceae family, which S. occarium belongs to, for the species Cerrena unicolor (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Cerun2/Cerun2.home.html), although the S. occarium ERGA assembly reported here represents the first EBP-level reference genome for the family.

While S. occarium is found across the northern temperate zone in Europe and northernmost Africa (Miettinen et al. 2023), the species is classed as endangered on the national Red List for the Czech Republic (Zíbarová et al. 2024), the locality from which the strain sequenced here was collected. Wood-decaying fungi are predominantly dependent on deadwood, which is more available in old-growth forests compared with younger or managed forests/plantations, and so the ongoing loss of old-growth forest habitat means that wood-decaying fungi are increasingly threatened by niche reduction (Jönsson et al. 2008; Lonsdale et al. 2008). Incidentally, this also means that certain fungal species can be used as indicator species for old-growth forest (Halme et al. 2009). Recognition of fungi in conservation discourse is relatively new (May et al. 2018), but progress is being made thanks to the enduring efforts of mycologists to raise their profile in Red Lists (Dahlberg and Mueller 2011; Mueller et al. 2014), as well as growing public and political awareness of the importance of fungi to ecosystems (IUCN 2021). Producing high-quality genomic resources for endangered species such as S. occarium is foundational to understanding and protecting them.

Results and Discussion

Near-complete Genome Assembly for S. occarium

We assembled the S. occarium genome using hifiasm (Cheng et al. 2021) from ∼100-fold coverage of PacBio HiFi reads, with a mean read length of 18.6 Kbp. The final, manually curated assembly (Table 1) exceeded the minimum reference standard defined by EBP assembly quality metrics (EBP 2023). Note that this final version of the assembly is a primary assembly and is highly heterozygous (1.69%; supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online).

Table 1.

Summary statistics for the gfSpoDele1 assembly and annotation

Nuclear genome Mitogenome
Number of contigs 11 1
Total size (bp) 30,870,404 112,912
N50 (Mbp) 3.05 …
Kmer QV 66.53 …
Number of protein-coding genes (high confidence/low confidence) 11,245 (9,409/1,836) 14 (35 ORFs, 19 intronic ORFs)
BUSCO completeness (assembly) C: 94.4% [S: 93.8%, D: 0.6%], F: 0.8%, M: 4.8%, n: 4464 …
BUSCO completeness (annotation) C: 98.6% [S: 97.7%, D: 0.9%], F: 0.1%, M: 1.3%, n: 4464 …
Open in a new tab

We predicted telomeres on both ends of 9 out of the total 11 pseudo-chromosomes, with the remaining 2 contigs (SUPER_9 and SUPER_11) having a telomere at one end (Fig. 1b). A total of 11 chromosomes was slightly lower than the number that has been previously reported for other Polyporales species assembled to chromosome level, which ranges from 12 to 14 (Chen et al. 2012, 2022; Wright et al. 2022; Ma et al. 2024), although this was explained by 3 chromosomal “fusions” that were flagged when we examined synteny relative to the Laetiporus sulphureus gfLaeSulp1 assembly (Fig. 1d). Each of these fusion events was supported following curation and manual checking of read alignments.

In addition to the nuclear genome assembly, we assembled and annotated the mitochondrial genome (Fig. 1c), which was a single circular contig 112.9 Kbp in length and included all 14 core protein-coding genes typically present in fungal mitogenomes (Sandor et al. 2018).

Gene and CAZyme Content

Gene models were generated using REAT (Robust Eukaryotic Annotation Toolkit; https://github.com/EI-CoreBioinformatics/reat) and functionally annotated with AHRD (https://github.com/groupschoof/AHRD; supplementary file S1, Supplementary Material online). We compared gene content across species with available genome annotations within the Polyporales “residual” clade as defined by Justo et al. (2017), including L. sulphureus as an outgroup (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). This first involved inference of a species tree from orthologous genes using OrthoFinder (Emms and Kelly 2019), where we found that the divergence of families in the phylogenomic tree corresponded with previous multilocus phylogenetic analysis within the order (Justo et al. 2017). We additionally predicted carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) genes using run_dbcan (Zheng et al. 2023; supplementary file S2, Supplementary Material online), as CAZymes are a major component of the gene repertoire necessary for white-rot (Hage et al. 2021). The total number of genes and CAZymes was slightly lower than either the closest available relative within Cerrenaceae, Cerrena unicolor, or Panus rudis in the sister family of Panaceae (Fig. 1e). The proportions of CAZymes known to act on various substrates were similar across all taxa, however.

Conclusion

Here, we present the first near-complete, annotated genome assembly for the wood-decaying bracket fungus S. occarium (previously Sp. delectans). The first representative for Kingdom Fungi under the ERGA initiative, this new high-quality genome resource will enable further exploration of the genetic basis of saprotrophy in an ecologically and chemically important lineage of fungi, the Polyporales.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection and Isolation

The S. occarium strain sequenced here was collected as a fresh basidiome growing on dead wood of Quercus cerris, on 2005 October 20 at the Rendez-vous nature monument in Czech Republic (Valtice, Břeclav, South Moravian region, 48.7499006N, 16.7939872E). This is the same locality from which the epitype of S. occarium was collected (Miettinen et al. 2023). The basidiome was placed on a petri dish of 2% malt extract agar, and the resulting culture was deposited in the culture collection of MENDELU (accession MUcc 838) and simultaneously kept in the Culture Collection of Basidiomycetes of the Institute of Microbiology, Prague (accession CCBAS136). Its identity was confirmed using phylogenetic analysis by Tomšovský (2012), under the previous name of Sp. delectans.

Nucleic Acid Isolation and Sequencing

DNA and RNA Extractions

Fresh mycelia were obtained after 2 week of stationary cultivation in 2% malt extract liquid media (24 °C, dark), washed in deionized water, hand-squeezed, and stored at −80 °C prior to DNA or RNA extraction. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was isolated in 8 aliquots, each consisting of up to 200 mg of frozen biomass, using a modified phenol–chloroform extraction (Sagova-Mareckova et al. 2008). Frozen biomass was homogenized in liquid nitrogen to a fine powder. All vortexing steps in the workflow were replaced by 50× repeated inversions of tubes to prevent DNA fragmentation. DNA was eluted in 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.5, and stored at −80 °C. RNA was extracted in 6 aliquots of at least 50 mg of mycelia using the Quick RNA Fungal/Bacterial Miniprep kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, excepting DNAse treatment, which was carried out separately using the Turbo DNA-free kit (Invitrogen) and stored at −80 °C. The quality of the isolated DNA/RNA was checked with gel electrophoresis, where samples with HMW DNA or RNA showing 3 separate bands for RNA subunits were considered acceptable.

PacBio HiFi Genome Sequencing

Four HWM DNA extractions were combined to construct a PacBio HiFi library at the Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (PacBio, P/N 100-983-900). In total, 18 µg of HWM DNA was manually sheared with the Megaruptor 3 instrument (Diagenode, P/N B06010003) according to the operations manual. After shearing, the sample underwent AMPure PB bead (PacBio, P/N 100-265-900) purification and concentration before undergoing library preparation using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (PacBio, P/N 100-983-900). The library was prepared according to the HiFi protocol v03 (PacBio, P/N 101-853-100) and the final library was size fractionated using the SageELF system (Sage Science, P/N ELF0001) and a 0.75% cassette (Sage Science, P/N ELD7510). The library was quantified by fluorescence (Invitrogen Qubit 3.0, P/N Q33216) and the size of the library fractions was estimated from a smear analysis performed on the FEMTO Pulse System (Agilent, P/N M5330AA). The loading calculations for sequencing were completed using the PacBio SMRTLink Binding Calculator 10.1. Sequencing primer v2 was annealed to the adapter sequence of the HiFi library. The library was bound to the sequencing polymerase with the Sequel II Binding Kit v2.0 (PacBio, P/N 101-842-900). Calculations for primer and polymerase binding ratios were kept at default values for the library type. Sequel II DNA internal control 1.0 was spiked into the library at the standard concentration prior to sequencing. The sequencing chemistry used was Sequel II Sequencing Plate 2.0 (PacBio, P/N 101-820-200) and the Instrument Control Software v10.1.0.125432. The library was sequenced on the Sequel IIe on 1 Sequel II SMRTcell 8 M. The parameters for sequencing were diffusion loading, a 30-h movie, a 4-h pre-extension time, a 2-h immobilization, and 70 pM on plate loading concentration.

PacBio Iso-Seq

One PacBio Iso-Seq library was constructed starting from 315 ng of total RNA according to the guidelines laid out in the Iso-Seq protocol v02 (PacBio, 101-763-800), using SMRTbell express template prep kit 2.0 (PacBio, 102-088-900). Please see the Supplementary material for full details. The sequencing chemistry used was Sequel II Sequencing Plate 2.0 (PacBio, 101-820-200) and the Instrument Control Software v10.1.0.119549. The Iso-Seq library was sequenced on the Sequel IIe instrument with 1 Sequel II SMRTcell 8 M cell. The parameters for sequencing were diffusion loading, a 30-h movie, a 2-h immobilization time, a 2-h preextension time, and an 80 pM on plate loading concentration.

Illumina RNA-Seq

One RNA-Seq library was constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library prep for Illumina kit (NEB#E7760L), NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA magnetic isolation module (NEB#7490), and NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (E6440S) at a concentration of 10 µM. Please see the Supplementary material for full details. The library was loaded onto a v1.5 NovaSeq SP flow cell using the NovaSeq Xp flow cell dock. The flow cell was then loaded onto the NovaSeq 6000 along with a NovaSeq 6000 v1.5 SP cluster cartridge, a buffer cartridge, and a 300-cycle SBS cartridge (Illumina). The NovaSeq was run with NVCS v1.7.5 and RTA v3.4.4, and was set up to sequence 150 bp paired-end reads. The data were demultiplexed and converted to fastq using bcl2fastq2.

Genome Assembly

PacBio HiFi reads were randomly subsampled to ∼100× coverage and assembled using hifiasm v0.16.1 (Cheng et al. 2021). Alternative haplotypes were removed using purge_dups v1.0.1 (Guan et al. 2020). The assembly was manually curated by loading it into the Gap5 sequence editor (Bonfield and Whitwham 2010), and each contig’s integrity was assessed. Four breaks were made due to erroneously assembled reads at contig ends, and 1 join was made between 2 contigs based on repeat analysis and genome synteny with the Trametes hirsuta reference genome (accession GCA_001302255.2).

Assembly completeness was estimated using BUSCO v5.4.7 with the Polyporales_odb10 dataset (Manni et al. 2021). The assembly consensus quality value (QV) was estimated using Merqury v1.3 (Rhie et al. 2020). Telomeric repeats (TTAGGG) at the ends of fragments were identified using tidk v0.2.31 (Brown 2023), with at least 5 repeats required for positive telomere prediction. The mitochondrial genome was assembled separately using IPA (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbipa).

Genome Annotation

Annotation of repetitive elements was performed using the EI-Repeat pipeline v1.1.0 (https://github.com/EI-CoreBioinformatics/eirepeat), which masked the genome assembly using RepeatMasker v4.0.7 (Smit et al. 2015) with a repeat library from RepBase and a de novo library of repeats constructed using RepeatModeler v1.0.11 (Smit and Hubley 2015).

Gene models were annotated using REAT (https://github.com/EI-CoreBioinformatics/reat) and Minos (https://github.com/EI-CoreBioinformatics/minos), incorporating transcript assemblies from Illumina RNA-Seq and PacBio Iso-Seq data, alignment of protein sequences from related species, and evidence-guided gene prediction with AUGUSTUS (Stanke and Morgenstern 2005). Please see the Supplementary material for full details. Gene models were functionally annotated using EI-FunAnnot pipeline v1.3 (https://github.com/EI-CoreBioinformatics/eifunannot) utilizing AHRD v3.3.3 (https://github.com/groupschoof/AHRD) with hits against fungal proteins from both Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL (downloaded 2022 June 15; The UniProt Consortium 2021) generated with BLAST v2.6.0 (Camacho et al. 2009) as well as results from InterProScan v5.22.61 (Jones et al. 2014).

The mitochondrial genome was annotated using MFannot v1.35 (Lang et al. 2023) and visualized using OGDRAW (Greiner et al. 2019).

Assembly and annotation data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive using COPO (Shaw et al. 2020).

Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomics

Assessment of syntenic conservation and collinearity with the chromosome-scale genome assembly of L. sulphureus gfLaeSulp1 (Wright et al. 2022) was performed using MCScanX v1.1 (Wang et al. 2012) and visualized using SynVisio (Bandi and Gutwin 2020).

For phylogenomic reconstruction of the Polyporales “residual” clade sensu Justo et al. (2017), we inferred orthologous gene families by running OrthoFinder v2.5.4 (Emms and Kelly 2019) on the S. occarium proteome alongside proteomes from other residual Polyporales taxa with available data and L. sulphureus as an outgroup (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). CAZyme genes for all taxa were predicted using run_dbcan v4 (Huang et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2023) and visualized alongside the STAG species tree produced by OrthoFinder.

Supplementary Material

evaf003_Supplementary_Data
evaf003_supplementary_data.zip (736.9KB, zip)

Acknowledgments

We thank the essential work of the ERGA Pilot Project co-ordinators, Ann Mc Cartney, Giulio Formenti and Alice Mouton, in making this work possible with their coordination effort as part of the ERGA Pilot Project daily activities. Many thanks to Felix Shaw, Debby Ku and Aaliyah Providence for their assistance with the COPO data upload. We thank Steven Singer for permitting the use of unpublished data for Cerrena unicolor from Mycocosm. The authors acknowledge the work delivered via the Laboratory Managers and Research Computing Groups at Earlham Institute who manage and deliver High Performance Computing at EI. We thank Thomas Brabbs and James Lipscombe for assistance and advice with laboratory automation, and Neil Shearer for LIMS support.

Contributor Information

Rowena Hill, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Jamie McGowan, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Vendula Brabcová, Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.

Seanna McTaggart, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Naomi Irish, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Tom Barker, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Vanda Knitlhoffer, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Sacha Lucchini, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Kendall Baker, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Leah Catchpole, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Chris Watkins, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Karim Gharbi, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Gemy Kaithakottil, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Alan Tracey, Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.

Jonathan M D Wood, Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.

Michal Tomšovský, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Petr Baldrian, Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.

David Swarbreck, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Neil Hall, Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available at Genome Biology and Evolution online.

Author Contributions

Rowena Hill: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. Jamie McGowan: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. Vendula Brabcová: methodology, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. Seanna McTaggart: project administration, writing—review & editing. Naomi Irish: methodology, investigation, writing—original draft. Tom Barker: investigation, writing—original draft. Vanda Knitlhoffer: investigation. Sacha Lucchini: methodology. Kendall Baker: project administration. Leah Catchpole: supervision. Chris Watkins: project administration, supervision. Karim Gharbi: resources, supervision, writing—review & editing. Gemy Kaithakottil: formal analysis, resources, software, writing—review & editing. Alan Tracey: data curation. Jonathan M.D. Wood: data curation, supervision. Michal Tomšovský: resources, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. Petr Baldrian: resources, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. David Swarbreck: resources, software, supervision, writing—review & editing. Neil Hall: resources, supervision, writing—review & editing

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation, Core Capability Grant (BB/CCG1720/1). Part of this work was delivered via the BBSRC National Capabilities in Genomics and Single Cell Analysis grant (BBS/E/T/000PR9816) by members of the Technical Genomics and the Core Bioinformatics Groups, and in e-Infrastructure (BBS/E/T/000PR9814) by members of the e-Infrastructure group at the Earlham Institute. Part of this work was supported by the Earlham Institute Strategic Programme Grant Decoding Biodiversity (BBX011089/1) and its constituent work package—Decode WP2 Genome Enabled Analysis of Diversity to Identify Gene Function, Biosynthetic Pathways, and Variation in Agri/Aquacultural Traits (BBS/E/ER/230002B). P.B. and V.B. were supported by the Czech Science Foundation (21-09334J) and by the Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic; Talking microbes—understanding microbial interactions within One Health framework; CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004597).

Data Availability

Genome assembly and annotation data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProject PRJEB75241 and accession GCA_964035595.1.

Literature Cited

  1. Bandi  V, Gutwin  C. Interactive exploration of genomic conservation. In: Proceedings of the 46th graphics interface conference. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society: University of Toronto; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonfield  JK, Whitwham  A. Gap5—editing the billion fragment sequence assembly. Bioinformatics. 2010:26(14):1699–1703. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown  M. 2023. A Telomere Identification toolKit (tidk). https://github.com/tolkit/telomeric-identifier.
  4. Camacho  C, Coulouris  G, Avagyan  V, Ma  N, Papadopoulos  J, Bealer  K, Madden  TL. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009:10(1):421. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen  C-L, Li  W-C, Chuang  Y-C, Liu  H-C, Huang  C-H, Lo  K-Y, Chen  C-Y, Chang  F-M, Chang  G-A, Lin  Y-L, et al.  Sexual crossing, chromosome-level genome sequences, and comparative genomic analyses for the medicinal mushroom Taiwanofungus Camphoratus (syn. Antrodia Cinnamomea, Antrodia Camphorata). Microbiol Spectr. 2022:10(1):e02032-21. 10.1128/spectrum.02032-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen  S, Xu  J, Liu  C, Zhu  Y, Nelson  DR, Zhou  S, Li  C, Wang  L, Guo  X, Sun  Y, et al.  Genome sequence of the model medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Nat Commun. 2012:3(1):913. 10.1038/ncomms1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng  H, Concepcion  GT, Feng  X, Zhang  H, Li  H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021:18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahlberg  A, Mueller  GM. Applying IUCN red-listing criteria for assessing and reporting on the conservation status of fungal species. Fungal Ecol. 2011:4(2):147–162. 10.1016/j.funeco.2010.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. EBP . 2023. Report on Assembly Standards v5. https://www.earthbiogenome.org/report-on-assembly-standards (Accessed April 9, 2024).
  10. Emms  DM, Kelly  S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019:20(1):238. 10.1101/466201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GBIF . 2024. Spongipellis delectans (Peck) Murrill. https://www.gbif.org/species/2543646 (Accessed April 17, 2024).
  12. Greiner  S, Lehwark  P, Bock  R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019:47(W1):W59–W64. 10.1093/nar/gkz238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grienke  U, Zöll  M, Peintner  U, Rollinger  JM. European medicinal polypores—a modern view on traditional uses. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014:154(3):564–583. 10.1016/j.jep.2014.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guan  D, McCarthy  SA, Wood  J, Howe  K, Wang  Y, Durbin  R. Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2020:36(9):2896–2898. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hage  H, Miyauchi  S, Virágh  M, Drula  E, Min  B, Chaduli  D, Navarro  D, Favel  A, Norest  M, Lesage-Meessen  L, et al.  Gene family expansions and transcriptome signatures uncover fungal adaptations to wood decay. Environ Microbiol. 2021:23(10):5716–5732. 10.1111/1462-2920.15423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hallenberg  N, Ryberg  M, Nilsson  RH, Wood  AR, Wu  S-H. Pseudolagarobasidium (basidiomycota): on the reinstatement of a genus of parasitic, saprophytic, and endophytic resupinate fungi. Botany. 2008:86(11):1319–1325. 10.1139/B08-088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Halme  P, Kotiaho  JS, Ylisirniö  A-L, Hottola  J, Junninen  K, Kouki  J, Lindgren  M, Mönkkönen  M, Penttilä  R, Renvall  P, et al.  Perennial polypores as indicators of annual and red-listed polypores. Ecol Indic. 2009:9(2):256–266. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang  L, Zhang  H, Wu  P, Entwistle  S, Li  X, Yohe  T, Yi  H, Yang  Z, Yin  Y. dbCAN-seq: a database of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) sequence and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018:46(D1):D516–D521. 10.1093/nar/gkx894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. IUCN . 2021. Re:wild and IUCN SSC become first global organizations to call for the recognition of fungi as one of three kingdoms of life critical to protecting and restoring Earth. https://www.iucn.org/news/species-survival-commission/202108/rewild-and-iucn-ssc-become-first-global-organizations-call-recognition-fungi-one-three-kingdoms-life-critical-protecting-and-restoring-earth (Accessed April 17, 2024).
  20. Jones  P, Binns  D, Chang  H-Y, Fraser  M, Li  W, McAnulla  C, McWilliam  H, Maslen  J, Mitchell  A, Nuka  G, et al.  InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014:30(9):1236–1240. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jönsson  MT, Edman  M, Jonsson  BG. Colonization and extinction patterns of wood-decaying fungi in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. J Ecol. 2008:96(5):1065–1075. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01411.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Justo  A, Miettinen  O, Floudas  D, Ortiz-Santana  B, Sjökvist  E, Lindner  D, Nakasone  K, Niemelä  T, Larsson  K-H, Ryvarden  L, et al.  A revised family-level classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota). Fungal Biol.  2017:121(9):798–824. 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lang  BF, Beck  N, Prince  S, Sarrasin  M, Rioux  P, Burger  G. Mitochondrial genome annotation with MFannot: a critical analysis of gene identification and gene model prediction. Front Plant Sci. 2023:14:1222186. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1222186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewin  HA, Robinson  GE, Kress  WJ, Baker  WJ, Coddington  J, Crandall  KA, Durbin  R, Edwards  SV, Forest  F, Gilbert  MTP, et al.  Earth BioGenome project: sequencing life for the future of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.  2018:115(17):4325–4333. 10.1073/pnas.1720115115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lonsdale  D, Pautasso  M, Holdenrieder  O. Wood-decaying fungi in the forest: conservation needs and management options. Eur J Forest Res. 2008:127(1):1–22. 10.1007/s10342-007-0182-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma  J-X, Wang  H, Jin  C, Ye  Y-F, Tang  L-X, Si  J, Song  J. Whole genome sequencing and annotation of Daedaleopsis sinensis, a wood-decaying fungus significantly degrading lignocellulose. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024:11:1325088. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1325088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Manni  M, Berkeley  MR, Seppey  M, Simão  FA, Zdobnov  EM. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021:38(10):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. May  TW, Cooper  JA, Dahlberg  A, Furci  G, Minter  DW, Mueller  GM, Pouliot  A, Yang  Z. Recognition of the discipline of conservation mycology. Conserv Biol. 2018:33(3):733–736. 10.1111/cobi.13228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mc Cartney  AM, Formenti  G, Mouton  A, De Panis  D, Marins  LS, Leitão  HG, Diedericks  G, Kirangwa  J, Morselli  M, Salces-Ortiz  J, et al.  The European reference genome atlas: piloting a decentralised approach to equitable biodiversity genomics. NPJ Biodivers. 2024:3:28. 10.1038/s44185-024-00054-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Miettinen  O, Vlasák  J, Larsson  E, Vlasák  J, Seelan  JSS, Levicky  Q, Larsson  K-H, Spirin  V. A revised genus-level classification for Cerrenaceae (Polyporales, Agaricomycetes). Fungal Syst Evol.  2023:12(1):271–322. 10.3114/fuse.2023.12.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller  R, Lodge  D. Fungal responses to disturbance: agriculture and forestry. In: Kubicek  CP, Druzhinina  IS, editors. Environmental and microbial relationships. The mycota, A comprehensive treatise on fungi as experimental systems for basic and applied research, Vol. IV. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mueller  GM, Dahlberg  A, Krikorev  M. Bringing fungi into the conservation conversation: the global fungal red list initiative. Fungal Conserv. 2014:4:12–16. 10.1017/s0953756202226659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Prescott  TAK, Hill  R, Mas-Claret  E, Gaya  E, Burns  E. Fungal drug discovery for chronic disease: history, new discoveries and new approaches. Biomolecules. 2023:13(6):986. 10.3390/biom13060986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rhie  A, Walenz  BP, Koren  S, Phillippy  AM. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2020:21(1):245. 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sagova-Mareckova  M, Cermak  L, Novotna  J, Plhackova  K, Forstova  J, Kopecky  J. Innovative methods for soil DNA purification tested in soils with widely differing characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008:74(9):2902–2907. 10.1128/AEM.02161-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sandor  S, Zhang  Y, Xu  J. Fungal mitochondrial genomes and genetic polymorphisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018:102(22):9433–9448. 10.1007/s00253-018-9350-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shaw  F, Etuk  A, Minotto  A, Gonzalez-Beltran  A, Johnson  D, Rocca-Serra  P, Laporte  M-A, Arnaud  E, Devare  M, Kersey  P, et al.  COPO: a metadata platform for brokering FAIR data in the life sciences. F1000Res. 2020:9:495. 10.12688/f1000research.23889.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Smit  A, Hubley  R. 2015. RepeatModeler Open-1.0. http://www.repeatmasker.org.
  39. Smit  A, Hubley  R, Green  P. 2015. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. http://www.repeatmasker.org.
  40. Stanke  M, Morgenstern  B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acids Res.  2005:33(Web Server):W465–W467. 10.1093/nar/gki458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. The UniProt Consortium . UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res.  2021:49(D1):D480–D489. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tomšovský  M. Delimitation of an almost forgotten species Spongipellis litschaueri (polyporales, basidiomycota) and its taxonomic position within the genus. Mycol Progress. 2012:11(2):415–424. 10.1007/s11557-011-0756-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Větrovský  T, Morais  D, Kohout  P, Lepinay  C, Algora  C, Awokunle Hollá  S, Bahnmann  BD, Bílohnědá  K, Brabcová  V, D'Alò  F, et al.  GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Sci Data.  2020:7(1):228. 10.1038/s41597-020-0567-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang  Y, Tang  H, Debarry  JD, Tan  X, Li  J, Wang  X, Lee  T-h, Jin  H, Marler  B, Guo  H, et al.  MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012:40(7):e49. 10.1093/nar/gkr1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wright  R, Woof  K, Douglas  B, Gaya  E. The genome sequence of the chicken of the woods fungus, Laetiporus sulphureus (bull.) murrill, 1920. Wellcome Open Res. 2022:7:83. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17750.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang  H, Yohe  T, Huang  L, Entwistle  S, Wu  P, Yang  Z, Busk  PK, Xu  Y, Yin  Y. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018:46(W1):W95–W101. 10.1093/nar/gky418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zheng  J, Ge  Q, Yan  Y, Zhang  X, Huang  L, Yin  Y. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023:51(W1):W115–W121. 10.1093/nar/gkad328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zíbarová  L, Kolényová  M, Tejklová  T, Zehnálek  P. Red list of fungi (macromycetes) of the Czech republic. Příroda. 2024:46:1–192. https://www.priroda.nature.cz/index.php/priroda/issue/view/17. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

evaf003_Supplementary_Data
evaf003_supplementary_data.zip (736.9KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

Genome assembly and annotation data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProject PRJEB75241 and accession GCA_964035595.1.

Articles from Genome Biology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES