Skip to main content
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications logoLink to Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
. 2024 Dec 27;43:101422. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101422

Corrigendum to “Protocol for double-blind RCT of acupuncture for vulvodynia” [Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. (2022) 1–8 101029]

Judith M Schlaeger a,, Marie L Suarez a, Jennifer E Glayzer a, William H Kobak b, Monya Meinel a, Alana D Steffen c, Larisa A Burke d, Heather A Pauls d, Yingwei Yao e, Miho Takayama f, Hiroyoshi Yajima f, Ted J Kaptchuk g, Nobuari Takakura f, David Foster h, Diana J Wilkie e
PMCID: PMC11784261  PMID: 39895859

The authors regret <1. In the Abstract, Methods section “(pain intensity)” should be changed to “(average pain intensity)”. 2. In section 2.6 Measures, 3rd paragraph, “The primary outcome, vulvar pain intensity” (provoked by the tampon insertion and removal stimulus), is measured with the Pain Intensity Number Scale (PINS) … should correctly read “The primary outcome, vulvar pain, (PAINReportIt® average pain intensity [API]: average of current pain, and least and worst pain in the last 24 hours), measured with the Pain Intensity Number Scale (PINS) [16] … >.

The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.


Articles from Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES