Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2024 Nov 15;80(2):399–404. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae419

A case of penicillin-resistant group B Streptococcus isolated from a patient in the UK

E McGuire 1,, D Ready 2,3, N Ellaby 4,5, I Potterill 6,7, R Pike 8,9, K L Hopkins 10,11,12, R L Guy 13, T Lamagni 14,15, D Mack 16,17, A Scobie 18,19, S Warren 20,21, C S Brown 22,23,24, J Coelho 25,26
PMCID: PMC11787890  PMID: 39545469

Abstract

Objectives

In England, group B streptococci (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae) are considered universally susceptible to penicillin. Reports from Africa, Asia, North America and a few European countries have described GBS isolates with penicillin MICs above the epidemiological cut-off (0.125 mg/L). Our aim was to characterize a penicillin-resistant GBS (PRGBS) isolate recovered in 2016 from a patient treated with long-term antimicrobials in the UK.

Methods

Antibiotic susceptibility of a referred isolate from a discharging sinus overlying a chronic prosthetic joint infection was determined using gradient strip testing for seven antibiotics. Illumina short read sequencing was carried out using a HiSeq 2500 platform to determine MLST, capsular type, to detect mutations in the pbp genes, and to compare the isolate with contemporaneous GBS isolates circulating in the UK.

Results

The GBS isolate belonged to capsular type Ia and MLST 144. We observed resistance to penicillin (MIC = 1 mg/L) and tetracycline (32 mg/L) with susceptibility to linezolid (1 mg/L), erythromycin (0.064 mg/L), clindamycin (0.064 mg/L), teicoplanin (0.064 mg/L) and vancomycin (0.25 mg/L). Deduced amino acid sequences revealed substitutions and non-synonymous changes in PBP2x and PBP2b. Genomic analysis of contemporaneous cases (n = 34) from across the UK identified single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variation ranged from 153–6596 SNPs.

Conclusions

We confirm the first identification of a PRGBS isolate amongst referrals to the UK’s national reference laboratory. Substitutions in pbp1a, pbp2a, pbp2x and pbp2b were identified that likely developed in the face of long-term beta-lactam antibiotic use.

Introduction

Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus, GBS) is widely recognized as a leading cause of neonatal sepsis1 and when a mother is known to be vaginally colonized with GBS, intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is given during labour to prevent GBS disease in her infant by vertical transmission. GBS is also increasingly recovered from adults with invasive disease, particularly in older people or those with comorbidities.2 It is a well-described cause of osteoarticular infection including prosthetic joint infection.3 Penicillin is the first line antibiotic for both IAP and treatment of GBS infection.

EUCAST have determined the epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) for penicillin in GBS to be 0.125 mg/L. Isolates with MICs above this threshold are considered to have acquired resistance mechanisms. There is growing international literature reporting the isolation of clinical GBS strains that have MICs above the ECOFF (Table 1). In 2008 in Japan,4 researchers reported the first molecular characterization of such isolates, demonstrating point mutations in pbp genes (encoding PBP2x, PBP1a, PBP2a and PBP2b), which have subsequently been shown to encode for proteins with a low-affinity for β-lactam binding. Further reports from Japan,5,8–10 and from Canada,6,7,15 Korea,11 USA,13,14 Germany12 and Sweden,16 have also identified penicillin-resistant GBS (PRGBS) with mutations in pbp genes (Table 1). The aim of this work was to characterize a PRGBS isolate recovered from a UK patient with a chronic prosthetic joint infection in 2016, by determining antibiotic susceptibility, identifying potential genetic mechanism(s) of resistance and describing the isolate relatedness to other English GBS isolates.

Table 1.

Microbiological and genomic characteristics of our isolate compared to international published reports of isolates with non-wildtype or resistance to penicillina amongst Group B Streptococcus isolates

Study (author year) Country (study period) Patient/sample PR-GBS isolates reported (or n/N tested, %) Serotype Penicillin MIC Mutations identified (those identified in PRGBS only are in bold)
PBP2x PBP2a PBP2b PBP1a
Our findings UK (2016) Pus from prosthetic joint infection 1 isolate Ia 1.0 (n = 1) I342V
V475I
P160S
Y331H
P140L
N540D
A27T
N741A
V744A
V541I
V80A K63E
Kimura 20084 Japan (1995–2005) Sputum samples from elderly patients 14 isolates Ib (n = 1)
III (n = 8)
VI (n = 4)
VIII (n = 1)
0.25 (n = 8)
0.5 (n = 5)
1.0 (n = 1)
Q557E
V405A
ND ND ND
Nagano 20085 Japan (2003–04) Invasive infections (adults) 8 isolates Ia (n = 1)
Ib (n = 1)
VI (n = 5)
N-typ (n = 1)
0.25 (n = 1)
0.5 (n = 6)
1.0 (n = 2)
S353F, A374V, F395L, V405A, A400V, R433H, H438Y, A514V, Q557E, G648A, T77I E63K,
T175I, L285F, Y236C
V80A, Y262N, G539E, T567I, G613R L45P, N163K, Y470F, G527V, N723S
Gaudreau 20106 Canada (2004–07) Invasive infection (adults) 1 isolate NR 0.25 (n = 1) I377V, G627V, N575D S453N, N682D V625I, P278L T526A
Longtin 20117 Canada (2008) Invasive infection (adults) 1 isolate II (n = 1) 0.5 (n = 1) G371D E636G, S644F, S676F ND T546P
Nagano 20128 Japan (2007) Invasive infections (adults) 10 isolates VI (n = 10) 0.25 (n = 10) V405A, F395L, R433H, H438Y, G648A
I377V, V510I
NT T567I ND
Seki 20159 Japan (2012–13) Invasive infections 45/306 (14.7%) NR 0.25 (n = 19)
0.5 (n = 20)
1.0 (n = 6)
V405A, Q557E NT NT NT
Morozumi 201610 Japan (2010–13) Invasive infections (adults) 9/443 (2.0%) Ia (n = 2)
Ib (n = 1)
III (n = 6)
0.125 (n = 5)
0.25 (n = 3)
0.5 (n = 1)
K372E, I377V, G398A, V405A, Q412L, G429D, H438Y, D478A, E513Q, Q557E NT NT NT
Yi 201911 South Korea (NR) Invasive infections (adults) 2 isolates NR 0.5 (n = 2) G398A, V405A, Q557E NT NT NT
Van der Linden 202012 Germany (NR) Invasive infections (adults) 2 isolates Ia (n = 2) 0.5 (n = 1)
1.0 (n = 1)
I377V, F395L, V405A, H438Y, V510I, Q557E ND V80A A521V, del719–722, N723S, V726A, T526I
Metcalf 201713 USA (2015) Invasive infections 6 isolates II (n = 1)
V (n = 1)
III (n = 4)
0.25 (n = 6) 1377V
G406D
Q557E
NT NR NR
McGee 202114 USA (2015–17) Invasive infections 6 isolates Ia (n = 1)
II (n = 1)
III (n = 2)
V (n = 1)
0.25 (n = 6) 1377V
G406D
G398A
G627V
V5101
I510V
Q557E
L534S
G627V
NT NT NT

PR-GBS, penicillin-resistant group B Streptococcus; ND, not detected; NR, not reported; NT, not tested; N-typ, non-typable.

aDefined as penicillin MIC above the EUCAST epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) of 0.125 mg/L.

Materials and methods

Bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing

Bacterial swabs collected from a chronic discharging sinus overlying a prosthetic joint infection were cultured on Columbia Blood Agar overnight at 37°C in air supplemented with 5% CO2. Local genus and species confirmation was carried out using a streptococcal grouping latex kit (Prolex, Prolab Diagnostics, UK) and MALDI-ToF mass spectroscopy (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by disc diffusion and interpreted in accordance with EUCAST guidelines (http://www.eucast.org).

At the UKHSA (formerly PHE) Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections (AMRHAI) Reference Unit, MICs for penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, teicoplanin, vancomycin and linezolid were determined by gradient strip testing (Liofilchem S.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy and bioMérieux, France) using ISO-Sensitest agar supplemented with 5% whole horse blood (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK) and interpreted using EUCAST guidelines (http://www.eucast.org; v. 6.0).

Genomic sequencing

WGS was undertaken at UKHSA, on the PRGBS isolate and compared with WGS data from 34 capsular type Ia contemporaneous sporadic isolates (selected from the same region as the PRGBS isolate to determine any genomic relationship with isolates of the same serotype) recovered in England between 2014 and 2020, the GenBank reference GBS type Ia isolate CP000114.1 (PUBMED: 16172379) and two published PRGBS isolates ERR3464559 and ERR346455812 (to compare resistance-conferring mutations). Sequencing was carried out using a HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina; San Diego, CA, USA). Nucleotides with a Phred score less than Q30 at the ends of the reads were removed with Trimmomatic.17 SNPs were determined using the PHEnix pipeline (GitHub. phe-bioinformatics/PHEnix. San Francisco: GitHub; available from: https://github.com/phe-bioinformatics/PHEnix). Reads were mapped to reference strain CP000114.1 using bwa (version 0.7.12). Variants were called using Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) 2.6.5 and parsed to retain high-quality SNPs (conditions: depth of coverage10, AD ratio (ratio between variant base and alternative bases) ≥ 0.9, Mapping Quality040, ratio of reads with MQ0 to total number of reads ≤ 0.1). Positions that fulfilled the filtering criteria in >0.9 of the samples were joined to produce a multiple FASTA format file where the sequence for each strain consists of the concatenated variants. The FASTQ files for the isolates described in this study were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) study number ID PRJEB56528. GUBBINS (Genealogies Unbiased By recomBinations In Nucleotide Sequences version 2.0.0) was used to remove SNPs from suspected regions of recombination (high SNP density), and distances were calculated using the reduced FASTA, creating a pairwise distance matrix with SNP-dists (GitHub. Tseemann/snp-dists. Available from: https://github.com/tseemann/snp-dists). MLST profile was determined by the mapping tool MOST.18 Mutations in pbp1a, pbp2a, pbp2x and pbp2b were identified using GeneFinder, an in-house software where sequenced reads are mapped to reference sequences with bowtie2 and mpileup file generated with SAMtools version 0.1.18.19

Results

Case details

In January 2016, a 47-year-old woman presented with a chronic infection at the site of distal femoral replacement. Forty years previously, she had undergone total femoral replacement following a diagnosis of osteosarcoma. In the 10 years preceding presentation, she had undergone multiple revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture and prosthetic bone and joint infection. All of her surgery had taken place in the UK. Since 2007, multiple chronic discharging sinuses had developed over the tibia and distal femur, however she remained well in herself. She declined further surgery, which would have involved amputation or hip disarticulation and little chance of eradicating the infection, preferring to stay on long-term antibiotic suppressive therapy. This consisted of doxycycline and trimethoprim for 7 years, then doxycycline and penicillin for 2 years, followed by clindamycin. Swabs of pus from the sinus had previously grown GBS, MSSA and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. By 2016, these organisms were doxycycline and clindamycin resistant, and she was not able to tolerate trimethoprim. Clindamycin was therefore changed to co-amoxiclav in January 2016, and a swab was taken to guide further suppressive therapy. PRGBS was isolated on this single occasion and has not been identified since. As there were limited alternative oral antibiotic options, a decision was made to continue co-amoxiclav, which she has remained on ever since. At her most recent clinic visit in February 2024, she had ongoing copious sinus discharge and had developed ipsilateral inguinal lymphadenopathy but remained systemically well.

Bacteriology

The GBS isolate was found to have a reduced penicillin disc diffusion zone at the local microbiology laboratory and was sent to the UKHSA AMRHAI Reference Unit for further testing. The isolate was confirmed as Lancefield group B Streptococcus serotype Ia by agglutination with specific antisera and was resistant to penicillin (MIC = 1 mg/L) and tetracycline (32 mg/L) but susceptible to linezolid (1 mg/L), erythromycin (0.064 mg/L), clindamycin (0.064 mg/L), teicoplanin (0.064 mg/L) and vancomycin (0.25 mg/L).

Whole genome sequencing

The PRGBS isolate was identified as capsular type Ia and MLST 144 (belonging to CC23) by WGS analysis. SNP variation ranged from 153–6596 SNPs when the sequence of this isolate was compared with contemporaneous UK GBS sequences, suggesting that this was not closely related to the serotype Ia isolates from the same region. Genomic analysis of the current English PRGBS isolate and two published Japanese PRGBS isolates found differences in pbp1a, pbp2a, pbp2b and pbp2x genes in comparison with the sequence from penicillin-susceptible reference strain CP000114.1 genes (Tables S1 and S2, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online, respectively), revealing amino acid substitutions in pbp1a, pbp2a, pbp2x and pbp2b. We observed in total 55 SNPs, which include 18 non-synonymous changes between the penicillin binding protein genes from the three penicillin-resistant isolates and the reference CP000114.1. In pbp2x, 15 synonymous mutations were observed, as well as four new non-synonymous mutations in the English isolate (P160S, Y331H, P410L, N540D), four mutations unique to either published PRGBS isolates (F360L, V370A, H403Y, Q522E) and two mutations conserved across the English isolate and the published PRGBS isolates (I343V, V374I) (Table S1). Seven synonymous changes were identified in pbp2b compared to the penicillin-susceptible reference strain, and one non-synonymous mutation was identified in all PRGBS sequences (V80A) (Table S2). For pbp1a, nine synonymous mutations were observed, as well as one non-synonymous mutation that was conserved across the English isolate and the published PRGBS isolates (K63E) (Table S3). In pbp2a, eight synonymous mutations were observed, as well as one new non-synonymous mutation in the English isolate (V541I), two non-synonymous mutation in ERR3464558A (V541A, T546I) and four non-synonymous mutations that were conserved across the English isolate and the published PRGBS isolates (A27T, N741A, V744A) (Table S4).

Discussion

This is the first report of a penicillin-resistant group B Streptococcus (PRGBS) isolate amongst referrals to the national reference laboratory in England, UK. This may represent in-host evolution of resistance in the face of exposure to prolonged antibiotic use. Ongoing surveillance of routine laboratory surveillance data in England has recorded no additional confirmed instances of PRGBS.20

PRGBS isolates with MICs above the ECOFF have been reported sporadically around the world since 1994; however, reports from European countries have been less common.16 Several previous reports describe patients with similar case histories: individuals with chronic prosthetic joint infections who had failed surgical attempts to eradicate infection and had received long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy.6,7,12 This highlights the risk of point mutation accumulation with long-term antibiotic selection pressure.

Several previous publications have noted amino acid changes in the pbp2x genes V405A and Q557E.4,5,9–12 These mutations have been considered key in the development of PRGBS due to their proximity to the conserved transpeptidase domain active site.4,9,11,12 However, the Q557E mutation has been reported in penicillin-susceptible GBS with elevated MICs (0.125 mg/L), and it has been suggested that it is a common first step in the development of resistance through the additive accumulation of subsequent pbp2x mutations.21 However, V405A and Q557E mutations were not observed in the isolate described here. Two non-synonymous pbp2x mutations that were conserved across all PRGBS isolates (I343V and V374I) and four new non-synonymous pbp2x mutations were identified (P160S, Y331H, P410L, N540D). To our knowledge, these mutations have not previously been reported in PRGBS isolates. We identified one pbp2b mutation (V80) that has previously been described.5,12 It is likely that the mechanism of resistance in this isolate is a stepwise accumulation of mutations in PBP1a, PBP2a, PBP2b and PBP2x.4–11 However, further work is required to determine the significance of mutations identified in genes other than pbp2x in terms of the development of penicillin resistance. Limitations of this work include that growth characteristics and MLST types were not compared.

The clinical significance of this PRGBS isolate is uncertain, and no further PRGBS isolates were recovered from this patient despite continued selection pressure from long-term beta-lactam use. However, the impact of antimicrobial resistance is clear from this case in which development of resistance to tetracyclines in the GBS isolate, in conjunction with resistance to macrolides and lincosamides in the other organisms implicated in her infection left her with few options for effective treatment. Resistance to these antibiotic classes, which are often considered second-line agents in GBS therapy, is increasing,20 and commonly reported in conjunction with PRGBS.8,9,22 Repeated sampling of sites of chronic infection should be considered for patients taking long-term suppressive antibiotics to monitor any development of antibiotic resistance. In addition, penicillin remains the first line drug of choice for intra-partum antibiotics used in the prevention of maternal and neonatal invasive GBS disease.23 There may be considerable selection pressure from IAP, particularly in countries with universal screening for GBS such as the USA where 30% of labouring women receive antibiotics in labour.24 While PRGBS have not been identified in surveillance studies of neonatal invasive GBS isolates in the USA and UK, continued surveillance of penicillin-susceptibility in GBS isolates is essential to guide therapeutic and preventative measures.25–27 The importance of ongoing surveillance of penicillin-susceptibility in GBS isolates is highlighted by the establishment of PRGBS in the WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024.28 GBS is also a common pathogen in animals, and a One Health approach to antimicrobial stewardship is crucial in stemming the tide of the development of antimicrobial resistance.29,30 Resistance to penicillin in GBS is classed as an exceptional phenotype by EUCAST; non-wildtype isolates (penicillin MIC0.25 mg/L) should be referred to the AMRHAI Reference Unit for confirmation and further characterization.

Supplementary Material

dkae419_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank NHS trusts in England and Wales for referring GBS isolates to UK Health Security Agency and for their participation in the study. We would also like to thank all the staff at the Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit and Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections Reference Unit at UKHSA for their support with this work. This project was funded by UK Health Security Agency.

Contributor Information

E McGuire, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.

D Ready, Health Protection Operations, Field Service, UK Health Security Agency, Bristol, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

N Ellaby, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections (AMRHAI) Reference Unit, UKHSA, London, UK.

I Potterill, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections (AMRHAI) Reference Unit, UKHSA, London, UK.

R Pike, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections (AMRHAI) Reference Unit, UKHSA, London, UK.

K L Hopkins, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections (AMRHAI) Reference Unit, UKHSA, London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK.

R L Guy, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.

T Lamagni, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK.

D Mack, Division of Infection, Immunity and Rare Diseases, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Bone Infection Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

A Scobie, Division of Infection, Immunity and Rare Diseases, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Bone Infection Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

S Warren, Division of Infection, Immunity and Rare Diseases, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Bone Infection Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

C S Brown, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK; Division of Infection, Immunity and Rare Diseases, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

J Coelho, Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU), and Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Ethics

Informed patient consent to publish these data was obtained by clinical team.

Funding

This work was supported by internal UKHSA funding and data generated as part of the routine work of the AMRHAI Reference Unit, UKHSA.

Transparency declarations

None to declare.

Supplementary data

Tables S1–S4 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.

References

  • 1. Stoll  BJ, Hansen  NI, Sánchez  PJ  et al.  Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics  2011; 127: 817–26. 10.1542/peds.2010-2217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Francois Watkins  LK, McGee  L, Schrag  SJ  et al.  Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal infections among nonpregnant adults in the United States, 2008–2016. JAMA Intern Med  2019; 179: 479–88. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lamagni  T. Epidemiology and burden of prosthetic joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother  2014; 69: i5–10. 10.1093/jac/dku247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kimura  K, Suzuki  S, Wachino  J  et al.  First molecular characterization of group B streptococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2008; 52: 2890–7. 10.1128/AAC.00185-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nagano  N, Nagano  Y, Kimura  K  et al.  Genetic heterogeneity in pbp genes among clinically isolated group B streptococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2008; 52: 4258–67. 10.1128/AAC.00596-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gaudreau  C, Lecours  R, Ismaïl  J  et al.  Prosthetic hip joint infection with a Streptococcus agalactiae isolate not susceptible to penicillin G and ceftriaxone. J Antimicrob Chemother  2010; 65: 594–5. 10.1093/jac/dkp458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Longtin  J, Vermeiren  C, Shahinas  D  et al.  Novel mutations in a patient isolate of Streptococcus agalactiae with reduced penicillin susceptibility emerging after long-term oral suppressive therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2011; 55: 2983–5. 10.1128/AAC.01243-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nagano  N, Nagano  Y, Toyama  M  et al.  Nosocomial spread of multidrug-resistant group B streptococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility belonging to clonal complex 1. J Antimicrob Chemother  2012; 67: 849–56. 10.1093/jac/dkr546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Seki  T, Kimura  K, Reid  ME  et al.  High isolation rate of MDR group B streptococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother  2015; 70: 2725–8. 10.1093/jac/dkv203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Morozumi  M, Wajima  T, Takata  M  et al.  Molecular characteristics of group B streptococci isolated from adults with invasive infections in Japan. J Clin Microbiol  2016; 54: 2695–700. 10.1128/JCM.01183-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yi  A, Kim  CK, Kimura  K  et al.  First case in Korea of group B streptococcus with reduced penicillin susceptibility harboring amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 2X. Ann Lab Med  2019; 39: 414–6. 10.3343/alm.2019.39.4.414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. van der Linden  M, Mamede  R, Levina  N  et al.  Heterogeneity of penicillin-non-susceptible group B streptococci isolated from a single patient in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother  2020; 75: 296–9. 10.1093/jac/dkz465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Metcalf  BJ, Chochua  S, Gertz  RE  Jr  et al.  Short-read whole genome sequencing for determination of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and capsular serotypes of current invasive Streptococcus agalactiae recovered in the USA. Clin Microbiol Infect  2017; 23: 574.e7–e14. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. McGee  L, Chochua  S, Li  Z  et al.  Multistate, population-based distributions of candidate vaccine targets, clonal complexes, and resistance features of invasive group B streptococci within the United States, 2015–2017. Clin Infect Dis  2021; 72: 1004–13. 10.1093/cid/ciaa151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. de Azavedo  JC, McGavin  M, Duncan  C  et al.  Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in invasive and noninvasive group B streptococcus isolates from Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2001; 45: 3504–8. 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3504-3508.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Persson  E, Berg  S, Bergseng  H  et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of invasive group B streptococcal isolates from south-west Sweden 1988–2001. Scand J Infect Dis  2008; 40: 308–13. 10.1080/00365540701678702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Giufre  M, Accogli  M, Ricchizzi  E  et al.  Multidrug-resistant infections in long-term care facilities: extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and hypervirulent antibiotic resistant Clostridium difficile. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis  2018; 91: 275–81. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tewolde  R, Dallman  T, Schaefer  U  et al.  MOST: a modified MLST typing tool based on short read sequencing. PeerJ  2016; 4: e2308. 10.7717/peerj.2308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Doumith  M, Godbole  G, Ashton  P  et al.  Detection of the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene conferring colistin resistance in human and food isolates of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother  2016; 71: 2300–5. 10.1093/jac/dkw093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.UK Health Security Agency. English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) Report 2022 to 2023. UK Health Security Agency, November 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-surveillance-programme-antimicrobial-utilisation-and-resistance-espaur-report
  • 21. Dahesh  S, Hensler  ME, Van Sorge  NM  et al.  Point mutation in the group B streptococcal pbp2x gene conferring decreased susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2008; 52: 2915–8. 10.1128/AAC.00461-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. UK Health Security Agency . Laboratory surveillance of pyogenic and non-pyogenic streptococcal bacteraemia in England: 2022 update. Health Protection Report, volume 17, number 14, 21 November 2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/655dd0f7544aea0019fb3233/hpr1423-annual-strep-2022-update.pdf
  • 23. Hall  J, Adams  NH, Bartlett  L  et al.  Maternal disease with group B streptococcus and serotype distribution worldwide: systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis  2017; 65: S112–s24. 10.1093/cid/cix660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease: green-top guideline No. 36. BJOG  2017; 124: e280–305. 10.1111/1471-0528.14821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nanduri  SA, Petit  S, Smelser  C  et al.  Epidemiology of invasive early-onset and late-onset group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: multistate laboratory and population-based surveillance. JAMA Pediatr  2019; 173: 224–33. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. O'Sullivan  CP, Lamagni  T, Patel  D  et al.  Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90  days, 2014–15: a prospective surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis  2019; 19: 83–90. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30555-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Snider  JB, Mithal  LB, Kwah  JH  et al.  Antibiotic choice for group B Streptococcus prophylaxis in mothers with reported penicillin allergy and associated newborn outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth  2023; 23: 400. 10.1186/s12884-023-05697-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024 . Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance. World Health Organization, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cobo-Angel  CG, Jaramillo-Jaramillo  AS, Palacio-Aguilera  M  et al.  Potential group B Streptococcus interspecies transmission between cattle and people in Colombian dairy farms. Sci Rep  2019; 9: 14025. 10.1038/s41598-019-50225-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Oliveira  LMAd, Simões  LC, Crestani  C  et al.  Long-term co-circulation of host-specialist and host-generalist lineages of group B Streptococcus in Brazilian dairy cattle with heterogeneous antimicrobial resistance profiles. Antibiotics  2024; 13: 389. 10.3390/antibiotics13050389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

dkae419_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES