Dear Editor:
Cutaneous warts are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). They can be treated with various methods, such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, and topical applications1. However, some patients develop persistent warts that are resistant to conventional management. Previous studies have proposed HPV vaccination as an alternative treatment for recalcitrant warts2,3,4,5. There are several hypotheses on how HPV vaccination helps eradicate recalcitrant warts. The main hypothesis is that the HPV vaccine has cross-reactivity and stimulates the host’s immune system4,5 Due to the 6-month long injection course and its cost, it is important to identify the patient group that would benefit the most from HPV vaccination.
Additionally, although the recommended age range for HPV vaccination is 9 to 26 years, a significant number of patients with recalcitrant warts exceed this range. However, it remains unclear whether HPV vaccination is beneficial beyond the age group for which it was originally approved. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics associated with the success of HPV vaccination as a treatment modality for recalcitrant warts.
This retrospective study analyzed patients with cutaneous warts who received the HPV vaccination while undergoing conventional treatment for warts at the SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center between March 2010 and November 2023. We compared the clinical characteristics associated with treatment success in an HPV-vaccinated population instead of comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients because the unvaccinated patients were significantly younger and had less number and smaller size of warts than the HPV-vaccinated patients. Patients who were immunocompromised or vaccinated before wart treatment were excluded. Both 4-valent and 9-valent vaccines were administered. However, cryotherapy was not terminated after the initiation of HPV vaccination because we believed that the combination of cryotherapy with immunomodulating therapies could be better than immunomodulating therapy alone6. Cryotherapy was only terminated if the patient firmly requested it due to pain.
The patients were categorized into two groups based on treatment outcomes: complete and incomplete responses. A complete response was achieved when no visible warts were observed, and there was no recurrence for up to one month. Variables including age, sex, number and location of warts, treatment duration, and type of treatment were recorded. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 30-2024-17), and the requirement for informed consent was waived.
Fisher's exact test was used to compare the complete and incomplete response groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with complete responses. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 29.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with the significance level set at p<0.05.
The study included 60 patients with an average age of 26.4 years (standard deviation, 12.6). The sex distribution was almost equal, and the median duration of treatment before vaccination was 7.7 weeks (Table 1). The complete response group comprised 33 patients (55%). When stratified by vaccine type, 47.1% (16/34) of the 4-valent vaccine and 64.0% (16/25) of the 9-valent vaccine achieved a complete response.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population (n=60).
| Characteristics | Total (n=60) | Complete response (n=33) | Incomplete response (n=27) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 26.4±12.6 | 23.8±10.3 | 29.6±14.5 | |
| <40 | 52 | 33 | 21 | |
| ≥40 | 8 | 2 | 6 | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 32 | 19 | 13 | |
| Female | 28 | 14 | 14 | |
| Pre-vaccination treatment period (wk) | 7.7 (0–106.5) | 7.3 (0–75.9) | 9 (0–139.1) | |
| Number of warts | ||||
| <10 | 35 | 20 | 15 | |
| ≥10 | 25 | 13 | 12 | |
| Location of warts | ||||
| Subungual | 21 | 10 | 11 | |
| Hand | 28 | 14 | 14 | |
| Foot | 44 | 25 | 19 | |
| Previous treatment | ||||
| Cryotherapy | 47 | 29 | 18 | |
| Laser | 14 | 7 | 7 | |
| Topical 5-FU/salicylic acid | 27 | 14 | 13 | |
| Intralesional bleomycin | 18 | 12 | 6 | |
| Oral retinoids | 15 | 8 | 7 | |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (minimum–maximum). Among the total of 60 patients, 33 showed a complete response, and 27 showed an incomplete response. None of the above characteristics differed significantly between the complete and incomplete response groups.
FU: fluorouracil.
We analyzed the characteristics of patients who achieved a complete response after receiving HPV vaccination. The median time to complete responses was 18.1 weeks after the first injection (Supplementary Table 1). However, no complete resolution was observed in the incomplete response group despite a median follow-up of 25.1 weeks, with the longest follow-up extending to 106.7 weeks. Most patients received concurrent treatment similar to that administered before vaccination. Cryotherapy was the most common treatment (30/33 patients), followed by topical 5-fluorouracil/salicylic acid. Patients who received cryotherapy as concomitant therapy required a median of four sessions, which took a median of 10.9 weeks after vaccination.
The only significant factor affecting the achievement of complete responses was age ≥40 years, which was less likely to achieve complete responses compared to age <40 years (hazard ratio, 0.236; 95% confidence interval, 0.056–0.992; p=0.049). However, other factors, such as sex, number or location of warts, and type of vaccination, did not show significant differences. According to the survival curves, half of the patients under 40 years old achieved complete responses within 24 weeks. However, in the patients over 40 years old, less than half achieved complete responses (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Individuals under the age of 40 showed superior outcomes compared to those aged 40 and above. A 50% cure rate was achieved at 24 weeks for patients under 40. Survival curves were plotted using Cox proportional hazards regression.
The complete response rates of previous studies that used HPV vaccination for recalcitrant warts were 46.7% in a study that utilized the 4-valent vaccine4, while those for the 9-valent vaccine were 62.2%5. Similar complete response rates were observed. In addition, our study found significant differences in complete response rates based on age, with rates of 59.6% and 25% for those aged ≥ and <40 years, respectively. Previous studies that examined age-related differences showed reduced treatment efficacy in individuals aged 27 and above5. However, these studies included only partial responders and were conducted without concurrent conventional treatments, which differ from the results of our study.
We analyzed data from only 60 patients, which might be a relatively large sample size among studies on HPV vaccines and recalcitrant warts4,5,7,8, but still may not be sufficient. Furthermore, our study design was retrospective and may not have excluded all confounding factors
In conclusion, our results suggest that HPV vaccination could be an option for patients under 40 years of age with recalcitrant warts, particularly those aged 27–39 years, who are outside the recommended age range for HPV vaccination. The age-related decline of the immune system is accompanied by poor vaccine responses in older people9, which may partly explain why our results showed a difference according to age. For patients aged less than 40 years, HPV vaccination could be considered if the warts are resistant to conventional treatments for more than 2 months and waiting until the full vaccination course, as it is less invasive, causes less discomfort to the patient, and can be easily added to existing wart treatments. In contrast, it is difficult to recommend for patients aged 40 years and older who have low response rates despite adjunctive cryotherapy.
Footnotes
FUNDING SOURCE: None.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have nothing to disclose.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Characteristics of the complete response group
References
- 1.Sterling JC, Gibbs S, Haque Hussain SS, Mohd Mustapa MF, Handfield-Jones SE, Hughes JR, et al. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of cutaneous warts 2014. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:696–712. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Venugopal SS, Murrell DF. Recalcitrant cutaneous warts treated with recombinant quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) in a developmentally delayed, 31-year-old white man. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:475–477. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Daniel BS, Murrell DF. Complete resolution of chronic multiple verruca vulgaris treated with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:370–372. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang MY, Son JH, Kim GW, Kim HS, Ko HC, Kim MB, et al. Quadrivalent human papilloma virus vaccine for the treatment of multiple warts: a retrospective analysis of 30 patients. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019;30:405–409. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1527006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shin JO, Son JH, Lee J, Kim HS, Ko HC, Kim BS, et al. Nonavalent human papilloma virus vaccine for the treatment of multiple recalcitrant warts: an open-label study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:940–941. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Attwa E, Elawady R, Salah E. ‘Cryo-immuno-therapy’ is superior to intralesional Candida antigen monotherapy in the treatment of multiple common warts. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32:1018–1025. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1720585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Waldman A, Whiting D, Rani M, Alam M. HPV vaccine for treatment of recalcitrant cutaneous warts in adults: a retrospective cohort study. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45:1739–1741. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abeck D, Fölster-Holst R. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination: a promising treatment for recalcitrant cutaneous warts in children. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95:1017–1019. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Factors that influence the immune response to vaccination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32:e00084-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00084-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Characteristics of the complete response group

