Abstract
Tumor metastasis is the primary cause of cancer-related mortality and remains a major hurdle in cancer treatment. Traditional cigarette smoking has been extensively studied for its role in promoting metastasis. However, the impact of e-cigarette (e-cig) on cancer metastasis is not well understood despite their increasing popularity as a supposedly safer alternative. This mini review synthesizes current literature on the effects of e-cig on cancer metastasis, focusing on the processes of dissemination, dormancy, and colonization. It also incorporates recent findings from our laboratory regarding the role of e-cig in tumor progression. E-cig exposure enhances metastatic potential through various mechanisms: it induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), increasing cell migratory and invasive capabilities; promotes lymphangiogenesis, aiding tumor cell spread; and alters the pre-metastatic niche to support dormant tumor cells, enhancing their reactivation and colonization. Furthermore, e-cig induce significant epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, which regulate genes involved in metastasis. Our data suggest that e-cig upregulate histone demethylases like KDM6B in macrophages, impacting the TME and promoting metastasis. These findings underscore the need for further research to understand the long-term health implications of e-cig use and inform public health policies to reduce e-cig use.
Keywords: E-cigarette, Metastasis, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Tumor microenvironment, Epigenetic modifications
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction
Tumor metastasis, the spread of neoplastic cells to distant locations from the primary tumor site, is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and poses significant challenges for cancer treatment [1]. Conceptually, metastasis can be divided into three temporally overlapping stages: dissemination, dormancy, and colonization [2]. During this three-step metastatic cascade, metastatic tumor cells undergo a series of complex genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic changes while continuously interacting with immune cells and extracellular matrix components [3]. The role of cigarette smoking in promoting tumor metastasis is well-documented [4]. E-cigarette (e-cig) were introduced as a putatively healthier alternative to traditional smoking and have gained widespread popularity [5]. However, due to the high levels of toxins in e-cig aerosols, increasing concerns are being raised about their purported health benefits, including the claims of lesser carcinogenicity [6, 7]. Research on the impact of e-cig on tumor metastasis is limited, and no large-scale epidemiological results directly link e-cig usage to cancer. However, one recent case report suggests a link between extensive vaping and oral squamous cell carcinoma [8]. Current literature suggests that e-cig may play an important role on enhancing stemness, inducing EMT, promoting lymphangiogenesis, and shaping the TME, all contributing to metastasis. This mini review aims to summarize the current literature on this topic, supplemented by observations from our laboratory.
2. Current status of E-cigarette use
2.1. Trends in E-cigarette usage
Since their introduction to the US market in 2007, e-cig have rapidly gained acceptance, particularly among young individuals who have never used traditional tobacco products [5]. The prevalence of vaping is increasing, suggesting that e-cig may soon become the primary nicotine product in the USA. From 1997 to 2020, the percentage of traditional tobacco users aged 18–24 years decreased from 29.1 to 5.4% [9]. Meanwhile, current e-cig use among young adults exhibited a significant quadratic trend over 2014–2018 (5.1%, 5.2%, 4.7%, 5.2%, 7.6%), with approximately 13 million American adults currently using e-cig [10–13]. Among adults aged 18–24, 14.5% use e-cig compared to only 6.1% who smoke traditional cigarettes [10]. E-cig usage among adults aged 18–29 has increased from 8.8% in 2019 to 10.2% in 2021, with the increase being greatest among those who have never smoked (p = 0.01) [14]. Additionally, e-cig are often used as tools for smoking reduction or cessation [15–17]. In 2021, former smokers made up the largest group of e-cig users among adults over 30, accounting for about 50% of this demographic [15, 18]. Overall, as more adults in the USA start using e-cig, it is crucial to pay closer attention to the potential harmful effects of e-cig.
2.2. Composition of E-cigarettes and aerosols
E-liquids, the fluid that is vaporized in e-cig, generally contain solvents such as vegetable glycerin (VG) and propylene glycol (PG), along with nicotine or nicotine salts and various flavorings. As a result, the aerosol produced by e-cig contain numerous harmful substances, including carbonyls, volatile organic compounds, trace heavy metal elements, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines, all classified by the FDA as harmful or potentially harmful. Many of these toxic compounds are generated through chemical reactions that occur during the high-temperature vaporization process, which can reach approximately 250 °C [19]. Compared with traditional tobacco, the effects of these components on health less understood and warrant further study (Fig. 1, Composition of E-Cigarettes and Aerosols).
Fig. 1.

Composition of E-cigarettes and aerosols
2.3. Health concerns and toxicants
Despite being marketed as a safer alternative to smoking, e-cig use exposes individuals to significant levels of toxicants, including heavy metals that increase cancer risk. Some research also indicates that e-cig use is associated with respiratory injury, altered breath-control [20], increased arterial stiffness, and an altered response to hypoxia [21], potentially leading to peripheral tissue hypoxia, immune evasion and reactivation of disseminated tumor cells. E-cig use can also lead to various oral health issues, including mouth and throat irritation, periodontal disease, dental damage, and changes in the oral microbiome. Some components of e-cig vapor have cytotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic properties [22, 23]. Most importantly, e-cig use has been associated with acute lung toxicity, with over 2800 cases reported in the USA, some of which resulted in death [24]. E-cigarette use is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (LCa) and bladder cancer (BCa), although the risk is lower compared to traditional smoking. E-cigarette users are diagnosed with BCa at a younger age compared to non-users [25]. Emerging evidence in animal models suggests that e-cig inhalation enhances the development and progression of carcinoma and/or premalignant lesions in the lung and bladder, probably through increased DNA damage [26]. E-cigarette users have a lower overall prevalence of cancer compared to traditional smokers. However, specific cancers such as cervical cancer, leukemia, non-melanoma skin cancer, other skin cancers, and thyroid cancer show a higher prevalence among e-cigarette users compared to traditional smokers [27]. Our group is the first to assess the effects of e-cig on tumor metastasis; our results from animal models point to a metastasis-promoting effect of e-cig on breast carcinoma [28], the recent study also found that exposure to the main components of electronic cigarettes, PG/VG and nicotine, significantly promotes tumor invasion, metastasis, and immunosuppression, while also increasing immune checkpoint markers like CTLA4 and PD-1, although these effects could be mitigated through immune checkpoint blockade therapy. This suggests that, while not direct carcinogens, these components of e-cigarettes pose significant risks by accelerating tumor progression and impairing antitumor immunity [29]. While other groups found that compared with tobacco-Cig condensate exerts, e-Cig condensate has less cytotoxic effects on 16HBE cells and less influence on exosomal protein expression, suggesting a lower potential for tumor development and metastasis. Although e-cig are often marketed as safer alternatives to traditional smoking, they pose several health risks, particularly to cardiovascular, respiratory, and oral health. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term health implications of e-cig use, especially for tumor initiation and metastasis [30].
3. Mechanisms and impact of E-cigarette on metastasis
3.1. Dissemination
Dissemination is the initial stage of metastasis, where tumor cells detach from the primary tumor, invade surrounding tissues, and enter the bloodstream or lymphatic system to travel to distant sites [31, 32]. E-cigarettes have been shown to impact various cellular processes and signaling pathways that may facilitate this stage, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition, lymphangiogenesis, and stemness, as well as cancer cell plasticity.
3.1.1. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is a well-studied process in cancer development characterized by dynamic changes in cellular organization. It involves the loss of cell polarity and downregulation of epithelial cell adhesion molecules, leading to enhanced migratory and invasive capabilities that facilitate metastasis in vivo [33, 34]. In vitro studies have demonstrated that e-cig exposure can induce EMT in various cancer cell types. For example, long-term exposure of A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells to e-cig aerosols resulted in a fibroblast-like morphology, loss of cell–cell junctions, and upregulation of EMT markers, accompanied by the nuclear translocation of active β-catenin [35]. Additionally, nicotine, a key component of e-cig, has been shown to promote EMT in pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer cells via miRNA-mediated pathways [36, 37]. In an orthotopic mouse tongue cancer model, in vivo nicotine treatment promoted cervical lymph node metastasis of implanted oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells. This treatment downregulated E-cadherin expression and upregulated EMT markers vimentin and Snail [38]. An in vitro study also showed that e-cigarette liquid (e-liquid) induces gene expression changes indicative of EMT, evidenced by decreased levels of epithelial markers like E-cadherin and increased levels of mesenchymal proteins such as vimentin and β-catenin in both OSCC cell lines and normal oral epithelium cells [39].
3.1.2. Lymphangiogenesis
Accumulating evidence indicates that cancer cells can stimulate the development of lymphatic vessels within and near tumors in a process known as tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis, thereby facilitating the dissemination of tumor cells to lymph nodes (LN) [40]. Retrospective studies have shown that a history of smoking is associated with LN metastasis status at diagnosis and post-therapy in patients with esophageal, oral, lung, and cutaneous cancers [41–44]. In a recent study of esophageal cancer, it was demonstrated that nicotine exposure decreases the expression of OUT domain-containing protein 3 (OTUD3). OTUD3 directly interacts with ZFP36 ring finger protein (ZFP36) and stabilizes it by inhibiting FBXW7-mediated K48-linked polyubiquitination. ZFP36 binds to the VEGF-C 3′ untranslated region (UTR) and recruits the RNA degrading complex, leading to rapid mRNA decay. The downregulation of OTUD3 and ZFP36 is crucial for nicotine-induced VEGF-C expression, lymphangiogenesis, and subsequent lymphatic metastasis of esophageal cancer [45]. The available research indicates that e-cigarette flavors, particularly menthol, tobacco, and cinnamaldehyde, can induce inflammatory responses, cytotoxicity, and endothelial dysfunction. These effects are likely to impair lymphangiogenesis by disrupting the function of lymphatic endothelial cells and altering the immune environment [46–49]. Further studies are needed to fully understand the specific mechanisms by which e-cigarette flavors, or other specific e-cigarette components influence lymphangiogenesis.
3.1.3. Stemness and cancer cell plasticity
The current understanding of tissue stem cells extends beyond cancer cells to encompass a state that many cells can enter and exit through phenotypic plasticity during tissue regeneration [50, 51]. Stemness differentiation of cancer cells is a prime example of cancer cell plasticity, playing a crucial role in all stages of metastasis: dissemination, dormancy, and colonization. In mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma, a high-plasticity cell state with multilineage differentiation potential has been identified as a precursor to metastasis [52]. Additionally, the reacquisition of more developmentally primitive transcriptional gene programs has been observed in metastasis of both mouse and human lung adenocarcinoma [53].
Recently, Schaal et al. demonstrated that both e-cig vapor and nicotine can enhance the self-renewal capabilities of a subset of lung adenocarcinoma cells enriched in stem-like cell populations. This enhancement is accompanied by upregulation of classic embryonic stem cell transcription factors such as Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog, likely mediated through the induction of c-Kit ligand/Stem Cell factor [54].
In summary, compelling experimental evidence indicates e-cig as an important factor to promote metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhancing cancer cell stemness and plasticity, and increasing lymphangiogenesis, all of which facilitate tumor cell dissemination to distant sites.
3.2. Dormancy and colonization
Dormancy refers to a period when disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) remain in a quiescent state, evading immune surveillance and resisting therapeutic interventions. Reactivation of dormant cells can lead to metastatic outgrowth and disease relapse. Cigarette exposure may influence the tumor microenvironment (TME) to support dormancy and subsequent reactivation. Colonization is the final stage of metastasis, where DTCs exit dormancy, proliferate, and establish secondary tumors in distant organs. Cigarette exposure has been linked to changes in the TME that facilitate this process.
3.2.1. Tumor microenvironment (TME)
The TME is composed of extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, and immune cells, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs play a crucial role in tumor progression, metastasis, and immunosuppression. In human breast cancer (BC), TAM infiltration is associated with poor prognosis and metastatic disease. Single-cell RNA sequencing of 165,753 cells from 22 treatment-naive lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients revealed key differences in the TME between never-smokers and smokers. In smokers, the dysfunction of alveolar cells significantly contributes to the aggressiveness of LUAD, while in never-smokers, an immunosuppressive microenvironment plays a more prominent role. The study also identified SPP1hi pro-macrophages as an independent source of monocyte-derived macrophages. Additionally, higher expression of immune checkpoint CD47 and lower expression of MHC-I in cancer cells of never-smoker LUADs suggest that CD47 may be a more effective immunotherapy target for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). This study highlights the distinct tumorigenesis mechanisms between never-smoker and smoker LUADs and proposes a potential immunotherapy strategy for LCINS [55].
Some research indicates that e-cigarette use is associated with increased arterial stiffness and an altered response to hypoxia, potentially leading to adverse cardiovascular outcomes [21]. Additionally, chronic intermittent hypoxia can induce serotonin-dependent changes in breathing control [56], which may have implications for e-cigarette users experiencing intermittent hypoxic conditions. It is also a common feature of the TME in solid tumors and has been implicated in promoting tumor progression, metastasis and resistance to therapy. In the TME, hypoxia leads to decreased proliferation and cytotoxicity of immune cells, such as CD8 T cells and Natural Killer (NK) cells, contributing to an immunosuppressive environment [57–59]. At the same time, hypoxia can promote immune escape by creating a physical barrier and altering the TME to inhibit immune cell infiltration and function [58, 60]. It also contributes to resistance against immune checkpoint inhibitors by fostering an immune suppressive TME [61]. As the outcomes of the e-cig exposure, hypoxia is closely associated with an immunosuppressive TME, contributing to immune cell dysfunction, immune escape, and resistance to immunotherapies. Targeting hypoxia within the TME holds promise for enhancing the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies and improving patient outcomes.
3.2.2. Immune evasion of dormant tumor cells
PD-L1, mainly expressed on tumor cells and TME TAMs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells and DCs, is a ligand for the inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor PD-1. The PD-L1-PD-1 interaction inhibits T cell activity [62]. Some investigators have found that smoking is associated with elevated PD-L1 expression in tumors, showing a dose-dependent relationship [63, 64]. It is hypothesized that tobacco carcinogens, such as benzo[a]pyrene (BAP), may play a role in upregulating PD-L1 expression [63]. With respect to the impact of e-cig exposure on BAP, one study found that e-cig aerosol condensate (EAC) can increase the metabolism of BAP to genotoxic products. EAC can activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), inducing CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 mRNA and protein, and increasing the rate of conversion of PAHs to genotoxic products [65]. Remarkably, e-cig emissions reduce BAP by 99.7% compared to cigarette smoke [66]. Therefore, further research is needed to investigate the relationship between e-cig effects on PD-L1 function and expression.
3.2.3. Reactivation of dormant tumor cells
In murine metastasis models, cancer cells have been shown to induce neutrophils to produce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which support metastasis. These NETs stimulate breast cancer cell invasion, migration, and lung metastasis [67]. Factors such as tobacco smoke have been shown to trigger reactivation of dormant DTCs [68–70]. E-cig exposure can alter the TME, making it more conducive to tumor cell survival and reactivation. Nicotine exposure skews macrophages and microglia towards a pro-tumor M2 phenotype, enhancing the secretion of factors like IGF-1 and CCL20, which promote tumor cell survival and reactivation [71]. Chronic nicotine exposure promotes the formation of pre-metastatic niches by recruiting pro-tumor neutrophils, facilitating the survival and colonization of disseminated cancer cells [72]. Additionally, e-cig exposure also promotes the pro-Inflammatory changes in TME by activating tumor cells. For instance, treatment of oral SCC with e-cig vapor extracts resulted in increased cell invasion and upregulation of inflammatory markers like NF-kB, TNF-α, and MMP-13 [73]. These changes in the TME can promote the establishment and growth of metastatic tumors.
The key role of TAM or its relatives in e-cig-promoted tumor metastasis has been suggested by a series of recent studies including results from our own lab. Nicotine has been shown to enhance brain metastasis by promoting microglial activation and reducing phagocytic ability, aiding tumor cell colonization [71]. In an earlier publication, we showed that e-cigs promote human breast cancer cell mobility in vitro and lung colonization in vivo [74]. One of our other publications also indicated that e-cig exposure significantly promoted lung metastasis of xenograft breast carcinoma in all animals (6/6) compared to the control cohort (2/6). During metastasis, e-cig exposure aids the survival and colonization of disseminated breast cancer cells through interactions with infiltrated macrophages, regulated by VCAM-1 and integrin α4β1 [28]. Our latest data also showed that subcutaneous oral SCC (MOC-2) injection mouse models exposed to e-cig exhibit increased cancer cell migration to lung tissues (6/16) compared to air exposure (1/16). In this study, we generate an immunocompetent mouse model of HNSCC in which the mouse oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell line, Moc-2, has been orthotopically transplanted subcutaneously into C57BL/6 wild-type mice. 7 days after the Moc-2 injection, the mice were exposed to the e-cig by using the InExpose rodent exposure system (2 h/day, 5 days/week, 50% PG and 50% VG, 36 mg/ml nicotine salt) for 20 days, the filtered air exposure as the control group. e-cig significantly aggravate tumor growth, necrosis and skin ulcer formation in exposed mice induced by Moc-2 tumor cell injection. e-cig exposed subcutaneous Moc-2 tumors and their associated lung metastasis colonies contain more TAM compared to the air control (Fig. 2). These result parallel findings from our published study where breast cancer mouse models treated with e-cig also displayed cancer cell migration to lung [28].
Fig. 2.

The impact of E-cig exposure on lung metastasis of Moc-2 mouse oral squamous cell carcinoma cancer cell. E-cig exposure promote metastatic colonies in lung parenchyma, as well as F4/80 positive macrophage number in tumor microenvironment (Unpublished data). N = 16 for each group, two-tailed T test, * < 0.05
4. Epigenetic modifications of E-cigarette exposure
4.1. Epigenetic mechanisms in metastasis
Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone alterations, and ncRNA interactions, play a central role in cancer metastasis. These changes facilitate key processes such as EMT, invasion, and colonization of distant tissues [75]. The advent of CRISPR-based epigenomic editing tools has provided new opportunities to dissect and manipulate these alterations, offering insights into their roles and potential as therapeutic targets [76]. The DNA methylome of primary breast cancers contributes to transcriptomic heterogeneity and different metastatic behaviors [77]. Epigenetic and post-translational modifications, including E-cadherin repression via promoter hypermethylation and histone modifications, are important in regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [78]. Post-translational modifications of histones, such as methylation and acetylation, alter chromatin structure and gene expression. For example, EZH2-mediated H3K27 trimethylation suppresses metastasis-suppressing genes [79–81]. LncRNAs and microRNAs are also involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. LncRNAs can regulate STAT3 signaling, while miRNAs modulate STAT3 expression, which are important in affecting cancer cell proliferation and metastasis [82].
4.2. Impact of E-cig on epigenetic modifications
Although, there is no direct evidence to show that e-cig influence the metastatic phenotype via epigenetic modifications, both e-cig and traditional tobacco exposure have been shown to induce significant epigenetic changes [83]. For instance, IGFBP-3, a tumor suppressor gene that is often suppressed in lung cancer, was downregulated by NNK (a tobacco-specific carcinogen, which also found in e-cig) treatment via DNA methylation. This suppression of IGFBP-3 in BEAS-2B normal lung epithelial cells finally led to increased cell proliferation [84]. Cigarette smoke affects EZH2 expression and reduces DAB2IP via H3K27me3 in COPD patients, promoting the progression of airway inflammation toward lung cancer [85]. Changes of cigarette smoked induced DNA methylation are most extensively documented for genes including AHRR, F2RL3, DAPK, and p16. Similarly, miRNAs like miR16, miR21, miR146, and miR222 were identified to be differentially expressed in smokers and exhibit potential as biomarkers for determining susceptibility to COPD. In our previous study, long term exposure to e-cig aerosols in mouse also led to global WBCs DNA methylation changes, which may affect MAPK signaling pathway [86]. Furthermore, our latest data also show that e-cig exposure up-regulates a series of histone demethylases including KDM6B in macrophages (Fig. 3), which may influence the TME and reactivation of dormant tumor cells at distant metastatic niche.
Fig. 3.

E-cigarette exposure can influence KDM6B mRNA expression in macrophages. We treated mouse macrophage cells (Raw 264.7) with e-cigarette condensate medium, with and without the KDM6B inhibitor GSK-J4. After 48 h, cells were collected, and RNA was isolated for RT-qPCR analysis of target gene expression. A E-cigarette exposure upregulates histone demethylase KDM6B in Raw 264.7 cells. B The KDM6B inhibitor GSK-J4 reverses the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 upregulation induced by e-cigarette exposure (unpublished data). N = 4, two-tailed T test
In summary, e-cig generate cellular stress with the potential to induce epigenetic changes; when these changes affect the EZH2-mediated metastasis-suppressing genes [85], or foster EMT [78], the risk of metastasis may rise(Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Epigenetic modifications of E-cigarettes exposure and related cancer metastasis
5. Public health implications
5.1. Impact of E-cigarette on cancer metastasis
The evidence presented in this mini-review suggests that e-cig use can promote various mechanisms that facilitate tumor metastasis, including enhancing stemness, inducing EMT, promoting lymphangiogenesis, and altering the TME. These findings underscore the potential public health risks associated with e-cig use, particularly for individuals at risk of or currently battling cancer. The widespread use of e-cig, especially among young adults and teenagers, raises significant public health concerns. The potential for e-cig to exacerbate cancer metastasis adds to the growing list of health risks associated with vaping. Public health initiatives should focus on educating the public about these risks and implementing policies to reduce e-cig use.
5.2. Recommendations for research and policy
Given the growing prevalence of e-cig use and the emerging evidence of its impact on cancer metastasis, further research is urgently needed to fully understand the long-term effects of e-cig exposure on cancer progression. Studies should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects and exploring potential preventative/therapeutic targets to mitigate the risks associated with e-cig use. Additionally, regulatory policies should be developed to address the potential health risks of e-cig, including stricter regulations on e-cig marketing, especially towards youth, and increased public awareness of the potential dangers of vaping. Research should also investigate the effects of different e-cig components and flavors on cancer metastasis. Understanding the specific toxicants and mechanisms involved can inform the development of safer alternatives and targeted interventions. Collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and policymakers is essential to address the public health challenges posed by e-cig.
6. Conclusion
This mini-review has summarized the current literature on the impact of e-cig exposure on tumor metastasis, highlighting the various mechanisms through which e-cig can promote tumor spread and growth. E-cig exposure has been shown to enhance stemness, induce EMT, promote lymphangiogenesis, and modify the TME, all of which contribute to metastasis. Our preliminary data suggest that targeting epigenetic modifications, such as inhibiting KDM6B, could be a potential therapeutic strategy to counteract the pro-metastatic effects of e-cig exposure in TAMs (Fig. 3). As e-cig use continues to rise, understanding its effects on cancer progression is crucial for developing effective public health strategies and regulatory policies. Future research should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects and exploring potential preventative/therapeutic targets to mitigate the risks associated with e-cig use.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by a Developmental Research Program Grant from the Yale Head and Neck SPORE, P50 DE030707
Footnotes
Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- 1.Gao Y, Rosen JM, & Zhang XH (2023). The tumor-immune ecosystem in shaping metastasis. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology, 324(3), C707–C717. 10.1152/ajpcell.00132.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gerstberger S, Jiang Q, & Ganesh K (2023). Metastasis. Cell, 186(8), 1564–1579. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Han Y, Wang D, Peng L, Huang T, He X, Wang J, et al. (2022). Single-cell sequencing: A promising approach for uncovering the mechanisms of tumor metastasis. Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 15(1), 59. 10.1186/s13045-022-01280-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li Y, & Hecht SS (2022). Carcinogenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke: A 2022 update. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 165, 113179. 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morean ME, Bold KW, Kong G, Camenga DR, Simon P, Jackson A, et al. (2020). High school students’ use of flavored e-cigarette e-liquids for appetite control and weight loss. Addictive Behaviors, 102, 106139. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Szukalska M, Szyfter K, Florek E, Rodrigo JP, Rinaldo A, Makitie AA, et al. (2020). Electronic cigarettes and head and neck cancer risk-current state of art. Cancers (Basel), 12(11). 10.3390/cancers12113274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goniewicz ML, Smith DM, Edwards KC, Blount BC, Caldwell KL, Feng J, et al. (2018). Comparison of nicotine and toxicant exposure in users of electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. JAMA Network Open, 1(8), e185937. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Klawinski D, Hanna I, Breslin NK, Katzenstein HM, & Indelicato DJ (2021). Vaping the venom: Oral cavity cancer in a young adult with extensive electronic cigarette use. Pediatrics, 147(5). 10.1542/peds.2020-022301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pierce JP, Luo M, McMenamin SB, Stone MD, Leas EC, Strong D, et al. (2023). Declines in cigarette smoking among US adolescents and young adults: Indications of independence from e-cigarette vaping surge. Tobacco Control. 10.1136/tc-2022-057907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanford BT, Brownstein NC, Baker NL, Palmer AM, Smith TT, Rojewski AM, et al. (2024). Shift from smoking cigarettes to vaping nicotine in young adults. JAMA Internal Medicine, 184(1), 106–108. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dai H, Ramos AK, Faseru B, Hill JL, & Sussman SY (2021). Racial disparities of E-cigarette use among US youths: 2014–2019. American Journal of Public Health, 111(11), 2050–2058. 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gentzke AS, Wang TW, Cornelius M, Park-Lee E, Ren C, Sawdey MD, et al. (2022). Tobacco product use and associated factors among middle and high school students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 71(5), 1–29. 10.15585/mmwr.ss7105a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dai H, & Leventhal AM (2019). Prevalence of e-cigarette use among adults in the United States, 2014–2018. JAMA, 322(18), 1824–1827. 10.1001/jama.2019.15331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bandi P, Star J, Minihan AK, Patel M, Nargis N, & Jemal A (2023). Changes in E-cigarette use among U.S. adults, 2019–2021. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(2), 322–326. 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kosterman R, Epstein M, Bailey JA, Furlong M, & Hawkins JD (2021). The role of electronic cigarette use for quitting or reducing combustible cigarette use in the 30s: Longitudinal changes and moderated relationships. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 227, 108940. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Balfour DJK, Benowitz NL, Colby SM, Hatsukami DK, Lando HA, Leischow SJ, et al. (2021). Balancing consideration of the risks and benefits of E-cigarettes. American Journal of Public Health, 111(9), 1661–1672. 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Agaku I, Egbe CO, & Ayo-Yusuf O (2022). Associations between electronic cigarette use and quitting behaviours among South African adult smokers. Tobacco Control, 31(3), 464–472. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bandi P, Cahn Z, Goding Sauer A, Douglas CE, Drope J, Jemal A, et al. (2021). Trends in E-cigarette use by age group and combustible cigarette smoking histories, U.S. adults, 2014–2018. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 60(2), 151–158. 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eshraghian EA, & Al-Delaimy WK (2021). A review of constituents identified in e-cigarette liquids and aerosols. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, 7, 10. 10.18332/tpc/131111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Neczypor EW, Mears MJ, Ghosh A, Sassano MF, Gumina RJ, Wold LE, et al. (2022). E-Cigarettes and cardiopulmonary health: Review for clinicians. Circulation, 145(3), 219–232. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sayegh AL, Faroze F, Paton J, & Fisher J (2023). Arterial stiffness and peripheral chemoreflex responsiveness in electronic cigarette users. Physiology, 38. 10.1152/physiol.2023.38.S1.5734086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang I, Sandeep S, & Rodriguez J (2020). The oral health impact of electronic cigarette use: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 50(2), 97–127. 10.1080/10408444.2020.1713726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holliday R, Chaffee BW, Jakubovics NS, Kist R, & Preshaw PM (2021). Electronic cigarettes and oral health. Journal of Dental Research, 100(9), 906–913. 10.1177/00220345211002116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miyashita L, & Foley G (2020). E-cigarettes and respiratory health: The latest evidence. Journal of Physiology, 598(22), 5027–5038. 10.1113/JP279526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Herriges MJ, Shapiro O, Jacob JM, Basnet A, Bratslavsky G, & Goldberg H (2022). Are e-cigarette users at an increased risk of bladder and lung cancer? Research Square. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1215135/v2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tang MS, Wu XR, Lee HW, Xia Y, Deng FM, Moreira AL, et al. (2019). Electronic-cigarette smoke induces lung adenocarcinoma and bladder urothelial hyperplasia in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 116(43), 21727–21731. 10.1073/pnas.1911321116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chidharla A, Agarwal K, Abdelwahed S, Bhandari R, Singh A, Rabbani R, et al. (2022). Cancer prevalence in E-cigarette users: A retrospective cross-sectional NHANES study. World Journal of Oncology, 13(1), 20–26. 10.14740/wjon1438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 28.Pham K, Huynh D, Le L, Delitto D, Yang L, Huang J, et al. (2020). E-cigarette promotes breast carcinoma progression and lung metastasis: Macrophage-tumor cells crosstalk and the role of CCL5 and VCAM-1. Cancer Letters, 491, 132–145. 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Arias-Badia M, Pai CS, Chen P, Chang A, Lwin YM, Srinath A, et al. (2024). E-cigarette exposure disrupts antitumor immunity and promotes metastasis. Frontiers in Immunology, 15, 1444020. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1444020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang W, Zeng R, Liu M, Chen M, Wei S, Li B, et al. (2023). Exosome proteomics study of the effects of traditional cigarettes and electronic cigarettes on human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicology In Vitro, 86, 105516. 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Valastyan S, & Weinberg RA (2011). Tumor metastasis: Molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell, 147(2), 275–292. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rocken M (2010). Early tumor dissemination, but late metastasis: Insights into tumor dormancy. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120(6), 1800–1803. 10.1172/JCI43424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, & Thiery JP (2016). Emt: 2016. Cell, 166(1), 21–45. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang J, Antin P, Berx G, Blanpain C, Brabletz T, Bronner M, et al. (2020). Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 21(6), 341–352. 10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zahedi A, Phandthong R, Chaili A, Remark G, & Talbot P (2018). Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of A549 lung cancer cells exposed to electronic cigarettes. Lung Cancer, 122, 224–233. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ben Q, Sun Y, Liu J, Wang W, Zou D, & Yuan Y (2020). Nicotine promotes tumor progression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating the miR-155–5p/NDFIP1 axis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology, 20(4), 698–708. 10.1016/j.pan.2020.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Du X, Qi F, Lu S, Li Y, & Han W (2018). Nicotine upregulates FGFR3 and RB1 expression and promotes non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via downregulation of miR-99b and miR-192. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 101, 656–662. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang M, Niu W, Qi M, Chen H, Zhang M, Wang C, et al. (2019). Nicotine promotes cervical metastasis of oral cancer by regulating peroxiredoxin 1 and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in mice. Oncotargets and Therapy, 12, 3327–3338. 10.2147/OTT.S194129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.de Lima JM, Macedo CCS, Barbosa GV, Castellano LRC, Hier MP, Alaoui-Jamali MA, et al. (2023). E-liquid alters oral epithelial cell function to promote epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasiveness in preclinical oral squamous cell carcinoma. Science and Reports, 13(1), 3330. 10.1038/s41598-023-30016-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stacker SA, Williams SP, Karnezis T, Shayan R, Fox SB, & Achen MG (2014). Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 14(3), 159–172. 10.1038/nrc3677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Abrams JA, Lee PC, Port JL, Altorki NK, & Neugut AI (2008). Cigarette smoking and risk of lung metastasis from esophageal cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 17(10), 2707–2713. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hussain A, Waqar UD, Ahmad DF, Khawar A, Bangash W, & Khan MY (2005). Association of smoking with lymph node metastasis in early stages of squamous cell carcinoma of tongue. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons-Pakistan, 15(5), 273–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ding N, Mao Y, Gao S, Xue Q, Wang D, Zhao J, et al. (2018). Predictors of lymph node metastasis and possible selective lymph node dissection in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(7), 4061–4068. 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jones MS, Jones PC, Stern SL, Elashoff D, Hoon DSB, Thompson J, et al. (2017). The impact of smoking on sentinel node metastasis of primary cutaneous melanoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 24(8), 2089–2094. 10.1245/s10434-017-5775-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang M, Li Y, Xiao YY, Yang MW, Chen JX, Jian YT, et al. (2021). Nicotine-mediated OTUD3 downregulation inhibits VEGF-C mRNA decay to promote lymphatic metastasis of human esophageal cancer. Nature Communications, 12(1), 7006. 10.1038/s41467-021-27348-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rowell TR, Reeber SL, Lee SL, Harris RA, Nethery RC, Herring AH, et al. (2017). Flavored e-cigarette liquids reduce proliferation and viability in the CALU3 airway epithelial cell line. American Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 313(1), L52–L66. 10.1152/ajplung.00392.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Morris AM, Leonard SS, Fowles JR, Boots TE, Mnatsakanova A, & Attfield KR (2021). Effects of E-cigarette flavoring chemicals on human macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21). 10.3390/ijerph182111107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Clapp PW, Pawlak EA, Lackey JT, Keating JE, Reeber SL, Glish GL, et al. (2017). Flavored e-cigarette liquids and cinnamaldehyde impair respiratory innate immune cell function. American Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 313(2), L278–L292. 10.1152/ajplung.00452.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu Z, Zhang Y, Youn JY, Zhang Y, Makino A, Yuan JX, et al. (2022). Flavored and nicotine-containing E-cigarettes induce impaired angiogenesis and diabetic wound healing via increased endothelial oxidative stress and reduced NO bioavailability. Antioxidants (Basel), 11(5). 10.3390/antiox11050904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shivdasani RA, Clevers H, & de Sauvage FJ (2021). Tissue regeneration: Reserve or reverse? Science, 371(6531), 784–786. 10.1126/science.abb6848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kobayashi Y, Tata A, Konkimalla A, Katsura H, Lee RF, Ou J, et al. (2020). Persistence of a regeneration-associated, transitional alveolar epithelial cell state in pulmonary fibrosis. Nature Cell Biology, 22(8), 934–946. 10.1038/s41556-020-0542-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Marjanovic ND, Hofree M, Chan JE, Canner D, Wu K, Trakala M, et al. (2020). Emergence of a high-plasticity cell state during lung cancer evolution. Cancer Cell, 38(2), 229–246 e213. 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Laughney AM, Hu J, Campbell NR, Bakhoum SF, Setty M, Lavallee VP, et al. (2020). Regenerative lineages and immune-mediated pruning in lung cancer metastasis. Nature Medicine, 26(2), 259–269. 10.1038/s41591-019-0750-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schaal CM, Bora-Singhal N, Kumar DM, & Chellappan SP (2018). Regulation of Sox2 and stemness by nicotine and electronic-cigarettes in non-small cell lung cancer. Molecular Cancer, 17(1), 149. 10.1186/s12943-018-0901-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Luo W, Zeng Z, Jin Y, Yang L, Fan T, Wang Z, et al. (2023). Distinct immune microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers from smokers. Cell Reports Medicine, 4(6), 101078. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ling L, Fuller DD, Bach KB, Kinkead R, Olson EB Jr., & Mitchell GS (2001). Chronic intermittent hypoxia elicits serotonin-dependent plasticity in the central neural control of breathing. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(14), 5381–5388. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-14-05381.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Arvindam US, Kennedy P, Ettestad B, Phung SK, Hinderlie P, Lim J, et al. (2021). Hypoxia profoundly alters Natural Killer cell phenotype and function: Implications for immunotherapy within the solid tumor microenvironment. Journal of Immunology, 206, 56.17–56.17. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hatfield SM, Kjaergaard J, Lukashev D, Schreiber TH, Belikoff B, Abbott R, et al. (2015). Immunological mechanisms of the antitumor effects of supplemental oxygenation. Science Translational Medicine, 7(277), 277ra230. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa1260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zandberg DP, Menk AV, Velez M, Normolle D, DePeaux K, Liu A, et al. (2021). Tumor hypoxia is associated with resistance to PD-1 blockade in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, 9(5). 10.1136/jitc-2020-002088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Abou Khouzam R, Zaarour RF, Brodaczewska K, Azakir B, Venkatesh GH, Thiery J, et al. (2022). The effect of hypoxia and hypoxia-associated pathways in the regulation of antitumor response: Friends or foes? Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 828875. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.828875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tamura R, Tanaka T, Akasaki Y, Murayama Y, Yoshida K, & Sasaki H (2019). The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment: Perspectives for therapeutic implications. Medical Oncology, 37(1), 2. 10.1007/s12032-019-1329-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hudson K, Cross N, Jordan-Mahy N, & Leyland R (2020). The extrinsic and intrinsic roles of PD-L1 and its receptor PD-1: Implications for immunotherapy treatment. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 568931. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.568931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang GZ, Zhang L, Zhao XC, Gao SH, Qu LW, Yu H, et al. (2019). The Aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates tobacco-induced PD-L1 expression and is associated with response to immunotherapy. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1125. 10.1038/s41467-019-08887-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Calles A, Liao X, Sholl LM, Rodig SJ, Freeman GJ, Butaney M, et al. (2015). Expression of PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in smokers and never smokers with KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 10(12), 1726–1735. 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sun YW, Kosinska W, & Guttenplan JB (2019). E-cigarette aerosol condensate enhances metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene to genotoxic products, and induces CYP1A1 and CYP1B1, likely by activation of the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14). 10.3390/ijerph16142468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Pinto MI, Thissen J, Hermes N, Cunningham A, Digard H, & Murphy J (2022). Chemical characterisation of the vapour emitted by an e-cigarette using a ceramic wick-based technology. Science and Reports, 12(1), 16497. 10.1038/s41598-022-19761-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Park J, Wysocki RW, Amoozgar Z, Maiorino L, Fein MR, Jorns J, et al. (2016). Cancer cells induce metastasis-supporting neutrophil extracellular DNA traps. Science Translational Medicine, 8(361), 361ra138. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Obenauf AC, & Massague J (2015). Surviving at a distance: Organ-specific metastasis. Trends Cancer, 1(1), 76–91. 10.1016/j.trecan.2015.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Risson E, Nobre AR, Maguer-Satta V, & Aguirre-Ghiso JA (2020). The current paradigm and challenges ahead for the dormancy of disseminated tumor cells. Nat Cancer, 1(7), 672–680. 10.1038/s43018-020-0088-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Albrengues J, Shields MA, Ng D, Park CG, Ambrico A, Poindexter ME, et al. (2018). Neutrophil extracellular traps produced during inflammation awaken dormant cancer cells in mice. Science, 361(6409). 10.1126/science.aao4227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wu SY, Xing F, Sharma S, Wu K, Tyagi A, Liu Y, et al. (2020). Nicotine promotes brain metastasis by polarizing microglia and suppressing innate immune function. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 217(8). 10.1084/jem.20191131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tyagi A, Sharma S, Wu K, Wu SY, Xing F, Liu Y, et al. (2021). Nicotine promotes breast cancer metastasis by stimulating N2 neutrophils and generating pre-metastatic niche in lung. Nature Communications, 12(1), 474. 10.1038/s41467-020-20733-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 73.Robin HP, Trudeau CN, Robbins AJ, Chung EJ, Rahman E, Strickland OLG, et al. (2022). Inflammation and invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells exposed to electronic cigarette vapor extract. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, 917862. 10.3389/fonc.2022.917862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Huynh D, Huang J, Le LTT, Liu D, Liu C, Pham K, et al. (2020). Electronic cigarettes promotes the lung colonization of human breast cancer in NOD-SCID-Gamma mice. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 13(8), 2075–2081. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen JF, & Yan Q (2021). The roles of epigenetics in cancer progression and metastasis. The Biochemical Journal, 478(17), 3373–3393. 10.1042/BCJ20210084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Banerjee R, Smith J, Eccles MR, Weeks RJ, & Chatterjee A (2022). Epigenetic basis and targeting of cancer metastasis. Trends Cancer, 8(3), 226–241. 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Reyngold M, Turcan S, Giri D, Kannan K, Walsh LA, Viale A, et al. (2014). Remodeling of the methylation landscape in breast cancer metastasis. PLoS One, 9(8), e103896. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Serrano-Gomez SJ, Maziveyi M, & Alahari SK (2016). Regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition through epigenetic and post-translational modifications. Molecular Cancer, 15, 18. 10.1186/s12943-016-0502-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Tellez CS, Picchi MA, Juri D, Do K, Desai DH, Amin SG, et al. (2021). Chromatin remodeling by the histone methyltransferase EZH2 drives lung pre-malignancy and is a target for cancer prevention. Clinical Epigenetics, 13(1), 44. 10.1186/s13148-021-01034-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Souroullas GP, Jeck WR, Parker JS, Simon JM, Liu JY, Paulk J, et al. (2016). An oncogenic Ezh2 mutation induces tumors through global redistribution of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation. Nature Medicine, 22(6), 632–640. 10.1038/nm.4092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.McCabe MT, Graves AP, Ganji G, Diaz E, Halsey WS, Jiang Y, et al. (2012). Mutation of A677 in histone methyltransferase EZH2 in human B-cell lymphoma promotes hypertrimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 109(8), 2989–2994. 10.1073/pnas.1116418109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ashrafizadeh M, Gholami MH, Mirzaei S, Zabolian A, Haddadi A, Farahani MV, et al. (2021). Dual relationship between long non-coding RNAs and STAT3 signaling in different cancers: New insight to proliferation and metastasis. Life Sciences, 270, 119006. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.119006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Yan R, Chen XL, Xu YM, & Lau ATY (2021). Epimutational effects of electronic cigarettes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(14), 17044–17067. 10.1007/s11356-021-12985-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Harada A, Jogie-Brahim S, & Oh Y (2013). Tobacco specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone suppresses a newly identified anti-tumor IGFBP-3/IGFBP-3R system in lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer, 80(3), 270–277. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Anzalone G, Arcoleo G, Bucchieri F, Montalbano AM, Marchese R, Albano GD, et al. (2019). Cigarette smoke affects the onco-suppressor DAB2IP expression in bronchial epithelial cells of COPD patients. Science and Reports, 9(1), 15682. 10.1038/s41598-019-52179-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Peng G, Xi Y, Bellini C, Pham K, Zhuang ZW, Yan Q, et al. (2022). Nicotine dose-dependent epigenomic-wide DNA methylation changes in the mice with long-term electronic cigarette exposure. American Journal of Cancer Research, 12(8), 3679–3692. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
