Abstract
1. Several lac diploid strains of Escherichia coli were constructed and tested to discover whether mutations in the lac promoter alleviate catabolite repression. 2. In each of these diploids the chromosome carries one of the promoter mutations, L8, L29 or L1; so that the rate of synthesis of the enzymes of the lac operon is only 2–6% of the fully induced wild-type. Each diploid harbours the episome F′lacM15 that specifies the synthesis of thiogalactoside transacetylase under the control of intact regulator, promoter and operator regions, but has a deletion in the structural gene for β-galactosidase. In each diploid more than 90% of the thiogalactoside transacetylase is synthesized from the episome, and 100% of the β-galactosidase is synthesized from the chromosome, and comparison of the extent of catabolite repression that the two enzymes suffered indicated whether the chromosomal promoter mutation relieves catabolite repression. 3. In the strains in which the promoter carries either of the point mutations L8 or L29 the enzymes were equally repressed, suggesting that neither L8 nor L29 affects catabolite repression. 4. In a diploid strain harbouring the same episome but carrying deletion L1 on the chromosome, synthesis of β-galactosidase suffered much less repression than that of thiogalactoside transacetylase. 5. In a diploid strain in which the chromosome carries L1 and also a second mutation that increases the rate of expression of lac to that permitted by L8 or L29, the synthesis of β-galactosidase again suffered much less repression than the synthesis of thiogalactoside transacetylase. 6. The effect of L1 (which deletes the boundary between the i gene and the lac promoter) is ascribed to its bringing the expression of lac under the control of the promoter of the i gene. 7. Even in strains carrying L1, some catabolite repression persists; this is not due to a trans effect from the episome since it occurs equally in a haploid strain with L1.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Grodzicker T., Zipser D. A mutation which creates a new site for the re-initiation of polypeptide synthesis in the z gene of the lac operon of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1968 Dec;38(3):305–314. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90388-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JACOB F., ULLMAN A., MONOD J. LE PROMOTEUR, 'EL'EMENT G'EN'ETIQUE N'ECESSAIRE 'A L'EXPRESSION D'UN OP'ERON. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1964 Mar 16;258:3125–3128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LENNOX E. S. Transduction of linked genetic characters of the host by bacteriophage P1. Virology. 1955 Jul;1(2):190–206. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(55)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leive L., Kollin V. Synthesis, utilization and degradation of lactose operon mRNA in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1967 Mar 14;24(2):247–259. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90330-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loomis W. F., Jr, Magasanik B. Genetic control of catabolite repression of the lac operon in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1965 Jul 12;20(2):230–234. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(65)90351-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller J. H., Ippen K., Scaife J. G., Beckwith J. R. The promoter-operator region of the lac operon of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1968 Dec;38(3):413–420. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90395-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moses V., Yudkin M. D. Catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. A study of two hypotheses. Biochem J. 1968 Nov;110(1):135–142. doi: 10.1042/bj1100135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Müller-Hill B., Crapo L., Gilbert W. Mutants that make more lac repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Apr;59(4):1259–1264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.4.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PRESTIDGE L. S., PARDEE A. B. A SECOND PERMEASE FOR METHYL-THIO-BETA-D-GALACTOSIDE IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 May 4;100:591–593. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(65)90029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reznikoff W. S., Miller J. H., Scaife J. G., Beckwith J. R. A mechanism for repressor action. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jul 14;43(1):201–213. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90089-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rickenberg H. V., Hsie A. W., Janecek J. The CR mutation and catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1968 May 23;31(4):603–608. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(68)90521-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scaife J., Beckwith J. R. Mutational alteration of the maximal level of Lac operon expression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:403–408. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverstone A. E., Magasanik B., Reznikoff W. S., Miller J. H., Beckwith J. R. Catabolite sensitive site of the lac operon. Nature. 1969 Mar 15;221(5185):1012–1014. doi: 10.1038/2211012b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yudkin M. D. Catabolite repression of the lac operon. Separt epressionof two enzymes. Biochem J. 1969 Sep;114(2):313–319. doi: 10.1042/bj1140313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yudkin M. D. Catabolite repression of the lac operon. The contribution f trascriptional repression. Biochem J. 1969 Sep;114(2):307–311. doi: 10.1042/bj1140307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yudkin M. D., Moses V. Carabolite repression of the lac operon. Repression of translation. Biochem J. 1969 Jun;113(2):423–428. doi: 10.1042/bj1130423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
