Abstract
Background
The incidence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) has increased during the last decades in Europe. Our aim was to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with TBE in Region Stockholm, as a high-risk area in Sweden.
Methods
The notification database at the regional Department of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention was used to identify TBE cases during 2006–2015. Clinical data were retrieved from the included patients’ medical records. The associations of specific variables to predefined outcomes of disease severity were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression models.
Results
Of 1004 identified TBE cases, 703 adult patients were included. Sixty-one percent were men, and the median age was 50 years (range, 18–94 years). The majority of patients were nonvaccinated. Comorbidity was present in 34%, and 4% were receiving immunomodulatory therapy. Seventy-five percent were hospitalized, and 11% had severe disease. More than 70% of the 79 patients followed up for >6 months had persisting symptoms. The case fatality rate was 1.4%, 15% in the group with immunomodulatory treatment. In the multivariate analysis, severe disease was associated with underlying comorbid conditions, age ≥50 years, and previous complete TBE vaccination.
Conclusions
This is the largest cohort of patients with TBE in Scandinavia. Our findings of a more severe course of disease in older patients, those receiving immunomodulatory therapy, those with comorbid conditions, and those with vaccination breakthrough infections must be interpreted in the context of hospitalized patients. Optimized prevention is needed for patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy, given the considerable case fatality rate. Follow-up visits and rehabilitation should be better standardized.
Keywords: tick-borne encephalitis, severity, sequelae, healthcare utilization, Sweden
Among 703 patients with tick-borne encephalitis in Sweden, a more severe course of disease was found in older patients and in those with immunomodulatory therapy, comorbid conditions, or vaccination breakthrough infection. Patients with immunomodulatory therapy had a considerable case fatality rate.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.
This graphical abstract is also available at Tidbit: https://tidbitapp.io/tidbits/tick-borne-encephalitis-clinical-characteristics-in-adult-patients-a-10-year-retrospective-study-in-stockholm-sweden?utm_campaign=tidbitlinkshare&utm_source=ITP
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infectious disease involving the central nervous system and is predominantly transmitted to humans by infected hard ticks, mainly Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes persulcatus [1]. The infection is occasionally acquired by consumption of infected unpasteurized dairy products and more rarely by breastfeeding, blood transfusions, organ transplantation, or laboratory exposure [2–5].
TBE is a disease of varying severity, ranging from mild symptoms to severe encephalitis. It often presents with a biphasic course. The initial phase correlates with viremia and includes nonspecific symptoms, such as fever, headache, and myalgia [5, 6], and is followed by an asymptomatic period [2, 5–7]. In the second phase, meningitis or meningoencephalitis develops, while some patients present with spinal involvement (meningoencephalomyelitis) [2, 6]. The spectrum of neurological symptoms is broad [4]. Many patients are hospitalized, and some require intensive care, while the mortality rate is rather low with a case fatality rate of about 0.5%–2% [2, 4, 6–9]. At discharge from the hospital, many patients are still experiencing symptoms [7, 8], and 20%–50% report incomplete recovery [6, 10–12].
There is no available evidence-based treatment for TBE. However, there are highly effective, inactivated vaccines, with an estimated field effectiveness in adults of 96%–99% [13, 14]. TBE vaccination breakthrough cases are rare [5]. Increasing age has been suggested to be associated with an inferior vaccine response [15–17]. These findings, however, are subject to different definitions of breakthrough infections and to how and when immunizations were performed, and the immune status of the patients is often unknown.
Although TBE is preventable to a high extent by vaccination, the incidence is increasing and represents a growing public health problem [1, 5, 18]. This also applies to Sweden, with 300–600 current diagnoses each year. The average annual cost for TBE-related healthcare in Sweden for 2015–2019 was estimated at 24.5 million Euros [19].
Clinical data on TBE in the setting of Swedish healthcare are scarce [20–22]. Over the last years, several large cohort studies have been published from Europe, but none from high-endemic areas in the northern countries. The aim of the present study was to obtain detailed clinical characteristics of patients with TBE in Region Stockholm, with 2.1 million inhabitants, as one of the most highly endemic areas in Sweden, and to analyze potential risk factors for the development of severe TBE.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Study Design
We performed a retrospective longitudinal study of patients with TBE in Region Stockholm. All notified TBE cases from 2006 to 2015 were identified through the national notification database of the regional Department of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention. TBE is a notifiable disease in Sweden, with mandatory reporting by the clinicians and microbiology laboratories, providing a high notification rate. Defined cases followed the national notification definition [23], in agreement with the criteria of the European Centre for Disease Control [24]. TBE was verified in all patients by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of specific immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG antibodies in serum, performed by the hospitals’ laboratories. Additional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and/or neutralization tests were performed in patients with vaccination breakthrough infections, and these results have been previously published [17].
Previously vaccinated patients were categorized into previous vaccination according to the recommended schedule in Sweden during a specific year (described as “completely vaccinated” and thoroughly presented elsewhere [17]) and vaccination that did not adhere to the recommended vaccination schedule (“incompletely vaccinated”). The standard vaccination schedule was initially 2 primary doses (at 0 and 1–2 months), followed by additional doses at 5–12 months and 3 years, and further doses thereafter every 5 years. From 2010, an extra priming dose at month 3 was recommended for all individuals aged ≥60 years.
Ethical Considerations
The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm (Diary Number 2016/1902-31/4).
Data Collection
Adult patients, ≥18 years of age, were included in the study. Data were previously collected, including vaccine doses regarding the completely vaccinated patients [17], and used in the present study. Herein, we included all the patients with TBE seeking healthcare at the 4 main hospitals in Region Stockholm (Karolinska University Hospital, Danderyds Hospital, Södersjukhuset, and St Göran Hospital), both inpatients and outpatients. Clinical and laboratory data were retrieved retrospectively from medical records. Data on symptoms and findings were collected at 4 predefined time points: 0 to <2 weeks, ≥2 weeks to <3 months, ≥3 to <6 months, and ≥6 to 12 months.
Classification of Disease Severity
An assessment of the severity of the disease in the acute phase was performed, according to the definition used in earlier studies [25]. Patients were thereby classified as having mild, moderate, or severe TBE. Primarily meningeal symptoms, such as fever, headache, neck stiffness, and sensitivity to light and/or sound, were categorized as mild disease. Moderate signs of encephalitis, with or without altered consciousness, and/or diffuse or focal neurological symptoms were categorized as moderate disease. Multifocal symptoms and/or severe signs of encephalitis with altered consciousness were categorized as severe disease.
Statistical Analysis
Differences in clinical characteristics were presented by vaccination status, underlying comorbid conditions, immunomodulatory treatment, and for 2 age groups (<50 or ≥50 years). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies (percentages), and differences were determined by means of χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Continuous variables were expressed as medians and means, and differences in means were analyzed using t tests. P values <.05 indicate significant differences.
The relationships between age, sex, comorbidity, immunomodulatory treatment, previous TBE vaccination, and disease severity were measured as odds ratios through multivariate logistic regression models. The following categories were used as outcomes for disease severity: moderate and severe disease, hospitalization, hospitalization for >7 days, treatment in the ICU, assisted ventilation, and case fatality. SAS Enterprise software (SAS Institute) was used for all statistical analyses.
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Presentation
From 2006 to 2015, we retrieved data from a total of 703 patients, representing 81% (703 of 863) of notified adult TBE cases in Region Stockholm (Figure 1). Ninety-five percent of the included patients had accessible data regarding previous TBE vaccination, of whom 82% were nonvaccinated (Figure 1B). The patients’ characteristics and clinical presentations are presented in Table 1. Underlying comorbidity was present in 242 patients (34%), and 26 (4%) were on immunomodulatory therapy. The majority had mild or moderate disease. Seventy-five percent were hospitalized, and 6% required care within the ICU. The outcome was fatal in 10 patients, for a case fatality rate of 1.4%.
Figure 1.
A, Flow chart of the included and excluded patients in the study. B, Accessible data regarding previous tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination, among included patients.
Table 1.
Basic and Clinical Characteristics, Laboratory and Radiological Parameters, Hospitalization, and Case Fatality Rate Among 703 Adult Patients With Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Region Stockholm, 2006–2015
| Characteristics and Parameters | Patients, No. (%)a (n = 703) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Men | 430 (61.2) |
| Women | 273 (38.8) |
| Age, y | |
| Median (range) | 50 (18–94) |
| Mean (SD) | 50 (16) |
| 18–29 | 77 (11) |
| 30–49 | 269 (38.3) |
| 50–69 | 282 (40.1) |
| ≥70 | 75 (10.7 |
| Previous TBE vaccination | |
| NA | 33 (4.7) |
| Nonvaccinated | 551 (78.4) |
| Incompletely vaccinated | 68 (9.7) |
| Completely vaccinated | 51 (7.3) |
| Underlying comorbidity | |
| Any comorbid condition | 242 (34.4) |
| Neurological disease | 44 (6.3) |
| Hematological cancer | 10 (1.4) |
| Other cancers | 22 (3.1) |
| Inflammatory disease | 43 (6.1) |
| Cardiovascular disease | 102 (14.5) |
| Psychiatric disorder | 58 (8.3) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 28 (4) |
| Liver failure | 1 (0.1) |
| Other | 29 (4.1) |
| Immunomodulatory therapy | |
| Any | 26 (3.7) |
| Prednisolone equivalentsb | 13 (1.9) |
| Methotrexate | 9 (1.3) |
| TNF-α inhibitors | 6 (0.9) |
| Cytostatics | 4 (0.6) |
| Otherc | 9 (1.3) |
| Combination of therapiesd | 13 (1.8) |
| Clinical characteristic | |
| Biphasic course | 404 (57.5) |
| Fever | 644 (91.6) |
| Headache | 636 (90.5) |
| GCS score | |
| Median (range) | 15 (3–15) |
| Mean (SD) | 14 (2) |
| Severity of disease | |
| Mild | 313 (44.5) |
| Moderate | 301 (42.8) |
| Severe | 80 (11.4) |
| CSF findings | |
| Lumbar puncture performed | 581 (82.7) |
| Pleocytosise | 547 (94.1) |
| Mononuclear lymphocyte count, cells/μL | |
| Median (range) | 38 (0–679) |
| Mean (SD) | 62 (75) |
| Polymorphonuclear leukocyte count, cells/μL | |
| Median (range) | 6 (0–860) |
| Mean (SD) | 20 (56) |
| Albumin, mg/L | |
| Median (range) | 405 (52–1560) |
| Mean (SD) | 441 (193) |
| Lactate, mmol/L | |
| Median (range) | 2 (1–4) |
| Mean (SD) | 2 (1) |
| Glucose, mmol/L | |
| Median (range) | 3 (2–10) |
| Mean (SD) | 3 (1) |
| Radiology, other diagnostics | |
| MR imaging | 125 (17.8) |
| Electroencephalography | 65 (9.3) |
| Inpatient care | |
| Hospitalization | 529 (75.3) |
| Time in hospital, d | |
| Median (range) | 7 (1–521) |
| Mean (SD) | 13 (36) |
| 1–7 | 301 (42.8) |
| 8–14 | 137 (19.5) |
| 15–29 | 50 (7.1) |
| ≥30 | 35 (5) |
| ICU admission | 39 (5.6) |
| Time in the ICU, d | |
| Median (range) | 6 (1–519) |
| Mean (SD) | 33 (88) |
| Assisted ventilation | 20 (2.8) |
| Duration of assisted ventilation, d | |
| Median (range) | 26 (2–609) |
| Mean (SD) | 79 (169) |
| Rehabilitation | |
| Any rehabilitationf | 156 (22.2) |
| Inpatient | 88 (12.5) |
| Outpatient | 84 (12) |
| Case fatalities | 10 (1.4) |
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ICU, intensive care unit; MR, magnetic resonance; NA, no answer; TBE, tick-borne encephalitis; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
aData represent no. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified.
bAny dose of prednisolone equivalents.
cIncluding azathioprine and budesonide (3 patients each) and trastuzumab, sulfasalazine, and tacrolimus (1 patient each).
dCombination of ≥2 immunomodulatory therapies.
eOf those with lumbar puncture performed.
fIncluding inpatient care at a geriatric ward and outpatient visits to and inpatient care at a neurorehabilitation unit.
Clinical Features in the Acute Phase and at Follow-up
Headache was the most frequently observed symptom in the acute phase (Table 2). Ataxia and dysphasia were the most common neurological signs, and mental fatigue the dominating cognitive symptom. More than half of the patients, 428 (61%), were still treated as inpatients or registered visits to the clinic between 2 weeks to 3 months after the first signs of infection. Considerably fewer patients had later inpatient treatment or follow-up visits. Among the patients with available follow-up data, cognitive disabilities were the most described persisting symptoms over the first year, with mental fatigue dominating. Ataxia and spinal nerve paresis were the most reported neurological sequelae. Of the 79 patients with a visit at 6–12 months, 71% still reported existing symptoms.
Table 2.
Clinical Symptoms and Signs During the Acute Phase and at Follow-up Visits in Adult Patients With Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Region Stockholm, 2006–2015
| Symptoms and Signs | Patients, No. (%)a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to <2 wk (Acute Phase) (n = 703) | ≥2 wk to <3 mo (n = 428) | ≥3 to <6 mo (n = 89) | ≥6 to 12 mo (n = 79b) | |
| Headache | 636 (90.5) | 142 (33.2) | 25 (28.1) | 18 (22.8) |
| Sensitivity to light/sound | 215 (30.6) | 32 (7.5) | 11 (12.4) | 5 (6.3) |
| Radiculitis | 65 (9.3) | 20 (4.7) | 3 (3.4) | 2 (2.5) |
| Cranial nerve affection | 83 (11.8) | 12 (2.8) | 8 (9) | 4 (5.1) |
| Spinal nerve paresis | 73 (10.4) | 45 (10.5) | 24 (27) | 18 (22.8) |
| Dysphasia | 221 (31.4) | 19 (4.4) | 6 (6.7) | 5 (6.3) |
| Apraxia | 74 (10.5) | 3 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Ataxia | 283 (40.3) | 78 (18.2) | 21 (23.6) | 13 (16.5) |
| Epilepsy | 16 (2.3) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Concentration disability | 263 (37.4) | 164 (38.3) | 42 (42.7) | 30 (38) |
| Memory disturbance | 213 (30.3) | 92 (21.5) | 33 (37.1) | 24 (30.4) |
| Mental fatigue | 551 (78.4) | 230 (53.7) | 58 (65.2) | 31 (39.2) |
| Emotional lability | 137 (19.5) | 83 (19.4) | 29 (32.6) | 19 (24.1) |
| Any of the above | 700 (99.6) | 315 (73.6) | 73 (82) | 56 (70.9) |
aPercentages indicate the percentage of patients followed up at the specific time point.
bOf the 79 patients followed up at ≥6 to 12 months, 48 were also followed up at ≥3 to <6 months.
Sex and Disease Severity
The disease severity differed between the sexes. Women were treated in the hospital to a higher extent and had longer hospital stays, but there were no significant differences between the sexes for treatment in the ICU or assisted ventilation, nor in the case fatality rate. Women participated in rehabilitation to a higher extent. The association to sex in the multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, underlying comorbid conditions, and immunomodulatory therapy, was present only for moderate disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.7 [95% confidence interval [CI], .5–.97]) and hospitalization (0.7 [.5–.9]), using women as the reference (Supplementary Table 1).
Underlying Comorbid Conditions, Immunomodulatory Therapy, and Age and Correlation to Outcomes
Patients with underlying comorbid conditions were older than those without comorbid conditions (Table 3). Patients with comorbid conditions were more often classified into severe or moderate disease, hospitalized, and treated in the ICU. In the multivariate analysis, using no underlying comorbidity as the reference, and after adjustment for age, sex, and immunomodulatory therapy, underlying comorbid conditions were significantly associated with severe (aOR, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.6–5.4]) and moderate (1.7 [1.2–2.5]) disease, hospitalization for >7 days (1.7 [1.2–2.6]), treatment in the ICU (2.4 [1.1–4.9]), and assisted ventilation (4.5 [1.4–14.6]). The case fatality rate was 3.3% in this group, compared with 0.4% in the group without comorbid conditions, even if no association with a fatal outcome could be shown after adjustment for age, sex, and immunomodulatory therapy (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 3.
Clinical Characteristics in 703 Adult Patients With Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Region Stockholm, by Presence of Underlying Comorbidity, 2006–2015
| Characteristic | Patients, No. (%)a | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Comorbidity | Comorbidity | ||
| Total | 461 (65.6) | 242 (34.4) | … |
| Age, median (range), y | |||
| 46 (18–94) | 58 (19–88) | <.001b | |
| Age, mean (SD), y | 46 (15) | 56 (16) | |
| Male sex | 292 (63.6) | 138 (57) | .10 |
| Clinical characteristics | |||
| Biphasic course | 286 (62) | 118 (48.8) | <.001b |
| Fever | 425 (92.2) | 219 (90.5) | .44 |
| Headache | 426 (92.4) | 210 (86.8) | .06 |
| Severity of disease | |||
| Mild | 240 (52.1) | 73 (30.2) | <.001b |
| Moderate | 181 (39.3) | 120 (49.6) | .009b |
| Severe | 33 (7.2) | 47 (19.4) | <.001b |
| Inpatient care | |||
| Hospitalization | 330 (71.6) | 199 (82.2) | .001b |
| Time in hospital, d | |||
| Median (range) | 5 (1–102) | 8 (1–521) | <.001b |
| Mean (SD) | 8 (11) | 20 (54) | |
| ICU admission | 14 (3) | 25 (10.3) | <.001b |
| Time in the ICU, d | |||
| Median (range) | 2 (1–45) | 12 (1–519) | .25 |
| Mean (SD) | 10 (14) | 45 (107) | |
| Assisted ventilation | 4 (0.9) | 16 (6.6) | <.001b |
| Duration of assisted ventilation, d | |||
| Median (range) | 32 (10–36) | 21 (2–609) | .57 |
| Mean (SD) | 26 (14) | 89 (185) | |
| Any rehabilitationc | 80 (17.4) | 76 (31.4) | <.001b |
| Case fatalities | 2 (0.4) | 8 (3.3) | .004b |
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.
aData represent no. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified.
bSignificant at P < .05.
cIncluding inpatient care in a geriatric ward and outpatients visits to and inpatient care in a neurorehabilitation unit.
The same patterns were observed in patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy (Table 4). Moreover, a considerably high case fatality rate (15.4%) was observed in this group, and in the multivariate analysis, using no immunomodulatory therapy as the reference, after adjustment for age, sex, and underlying comorbid conditions, immunomodulatory therapy was significantly associated with a fatal outcome (aOR, 8. [95% CI, 1.8–36.8]; Supplementary Table 1).
Table 4.
Clinical Characteristics in 703 Adult Patients With Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Region Stockholm, by Receipt of Immunomodulatory Therapy, 2006–2015
| Characteristic | Patients, No. (%)a | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Immunomodulatory Therapy | Immunomodulatory Therapy | ||
| Total | 677 (96.3) | 26 (3.7) | … |
| Age, median (range), y | 49 (18–94) | 62 (34–83) | <.001b |
| Age, mean (SD), y | 49 (16) | 63 (12) | |
| Male sex | 415 (61.3) | 15 (57.7) | .71 |
| Clinical characteristic | |||
| Biphasic course | 389 (57.5) | 15 (57.7) | .98 |
| Fever | 621 (91.7) | 23 (88.5) | .56 |
| Headache | 617 (91.1) | 19 (73.1) | .004b |
| Severity of disease | |||
| Mild | 308 (45.5) | 5 (19.2) | .008b |
| Moderate | 290 (42.8) | 11 (42.3) | .96 |
| Severe | 70 (10.3) | 10 (38.5) | <.001b |
| Inpatient care | |||
| Hospitalization | 506 (74.7) | 23 (88.5) | .04b |
| Time in hospital, d | |||
| Median (range) | 6 (1–521) | 12 (2–466) | <.001b |
| Mean (SD) | 11 (29) | 36 (94) | |
| ICU admission | 34 (5) | 5 (19.2) | .002b |
| Time in the ICU, d | |||
| Median (range) | 5 (1–519) | 27 (1–156) | .7 |
| Mean (SD) | 30 (92) | 47 (62) | |
| Assisted ventilation | 16 (2.4) | 4 (15.4) | .005b |
| Duration of assisted ventilation, d | |||
| Median (range) | 25 (2–609) | 26 (18–466) | .48 |
| Mean (SD) | 63 (158) | 134 (221) | |
| Any rehabilitationc | 144 (21.3) | 12 (46.2) | .003b |
| Case fatalities | 6 (0.9) | 4 (15.4) | <.001b |
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.
aData represent no. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified.
bSignificant at P < .05.
cIncluding inpatient care in a geriatric ward and outpatient visits to and inpatient care in a neurorehabilitation unit.
We observed a similar sex distribution in the group of patients aged ≥50 years and in the group aged <50 years (Table 5). An age ≥50 years was associated with severe and moderate disease, and these patients were more likely to be hospitalized and admitted to the ICU. In addition, hospital stays were longer in the ≥50-year age group. The case fatality rate in that group was 2.8%, whereas none in the younger age group died of the disease. In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for sex, underlying comorbid conditions, and immunomodulatory therapy, the association remained significant for both severe (aOR, 5.8 [95%, CI, 3.1–10.8]) and moderate (1.9 [1.4–2.7]) disease in the ≥50-year age group. Moreover, hospitalization (aOR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2–2.5]), hospitalization >7 days (2.4 [1.7–3.5]), treatment in the ICU (3.0 [1.3–6.8]), and assisted ventilation (5.8 [1.3–25.8]) were significantly associated with older age (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 5.
Clinical Characteristics in 703 Adult Patients With Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Region Stockholm, by Age, 2006–2015
| Characteristic | Patients, No. (%)a | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age <50 y | Age ≥50 y | ||
| Total | 346 (49.2) | 357 (50.8) | … |
| Age, median (range) | 37 (18–49) | 61 (50–94) | … |
| Age, mean (SD) | 36 (9) | 62 (9) | |
| Male sex | 214 (61.9) | 216 (60.5) | .71 |
| Clinical characteristics | |||
| Biphasic course | 237 (68.5) | 167 (46.8) | <.001b |
| Fever | 316 (91.3) | 328 (91.9) | .79 |
| Headache | 339 (98) | 297 (83.2) | <.001b |
| Severity of disease | |||
| Mild | 195 (56.4) | 118 (33.1) | <.001b |
| Moderate | 131 (37.9) | 170 (47.6) | .009b |
| Severe | 15 (4.3) | 65 (18.2) | <.001b |
| Inpatient care | |||
| Hospitalization | 239 (69.1) | 290 (81.2) | <.001b |
| Time in hospital, d | |||
| Median (range) | 5 (1–263) | 8 (1–521) | .02b |
| Mean (SD) | 8 (21) | 16 (43) | |
| ICU admission | 8 (2.3) | 31 (8.7) | <.001b |
| Time in the ICU, d | |||
| Median (range) | 2 (1–79) | 10 (1–519) | .47 |
| Mean (SD) | 12 (27) | 38 (98) | |
| Assisted ventilation | 2 (0.6) | 18 (5) | <.001b |
| Duration of assisted ventilation, d | |||
| Median (range) | 25 (4–46) | 26 (2–609) | .65 |
| Mean (SD) | 25 (30) | 85 (179) | |
| Any rehabilitationc | 47 (13.6) | 109 (30.5) | <.001b |
| Case fatalities | 0 | 10 (2.8) | … |
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.
aData represent no. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified.
bSignificant at P < .05.
cIncluding inpatient care in a geriatric ward and outpatient visits to and inpatient care in a neurorehabilitation unit.
TBE Vaccination Status and Disease Severity
A subanalysis was performed on the 670 patients who had accessible data regarding previous TBE vaccination (Table 6). The majority were nonvaccinated (82%), 68 patients (10%) were vaccinated but had not adhered to the recommended vaccination schedule (incompletely vaccinated), while 51 (8%) were previously completely vaccinated. Data from the completely vaccinated subgroup have been thoroughly described elsewhere [17]. Within the incompletely vaccinated group, 31 individuals had received only 1 previous TBE vaccine dose, and 18 had received 2 doses more than a year before onset of disease (data not shown).
Table 6.
Basic and Clinical Characteristics, Laboratory and Radiological Parameters, Hospitalization, and Mortality Rate in 670 Adult Patients With Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) in Region Stockholm by TBE Vaccination Status, 2006–2015
| Variable | Patients, No. (%)a | P Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NV | IV | CV | NV vs CV | IV vs CV | NV vs IV | |
| Total | 551 (82.2) | 68 (10.1) | 51 (7.6) | … | … | … |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 339 (61.5) | 34 (50) | 32 (62.8) | .86 | .17 | .07 |
| Female | 212 (38.5) | 34 (50) | 19 (37.3) | |||
| Age, median (range), y | 48 (18–94) | 55 (21–86) | 62 (19–83) | <.001b | .04b | .002b |
| Age, mean (SD), y | 48 (15) | 54 (17) | 60 (14) | |||
| Any underlying comorbidity | 175 (31.8) | 26 (38.2) | 29 (56.9) | <.001b | .04b | .28 |
| Immunomodulatory therapy | ||||||
| Any | 14 (2.5) | 3 (4.4) | 7 (13.7) | .001b | .09 | .42 |
| Prednisolone equivalentsc | 6 (1.1) | 3 (4.4) | 2 (3.9) | .14 | .89 | .06 |
| Methotrexate | 4 (0.7) | 1 (1.5) | 4 (7.8) | .003b | .16 | .44 |
| TNF-α inhibitors | 3 (0.5) | 1 (1.5) | 2 (3.9) | .06 | .57 | .37 |
| Cytostatics | 3 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | .59 | … | .54 |
| Other | 7 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | .51 | .42 | .44 |
| Combination of therapiesd | 8 (1.5) | 2 (2.9) | 2 (3.9) | .18 | 1 | .3 |
| Clinical characteristics | ||||||
| Biphasic course | 351 (63.7) | 25 (36.8) | 12 (23.3) | <.001b | .12 | <.001b |
| Fever | 500 (90.7) | 65 (95.6) | 48 (94.1) | .60 | .72 | .18 |
| Headache | 508 (92.2) | 59 (86.8) | 41 (80.4) | .17 | .86 | .03 |
| Severity of disease | ||||||
| Mild | 261 (47.4) | 26 (38.2) | 10 (19.6) | <.001b | .03b | .15 |
| Moderate | 237 (43) | 32 (47.1) | 20 (39.2) | .59 | .39 | .52 |
| Severe | 46 (8.4) | 10 (14.7) | 20 (39.2) | <.001b | .002b | .08 |
| CSF findings | ||||||
| Lumbar puncture performed | 449 (81.5) | 60 (88.2) | 49 (96.1) | .008b | .18 | .17 |
| Pleocytosise | 425 (77.1) | 54 (79.4) | 49 (96.1) | .15 | .03b | .15 |
| Albumin, mg/L | ||||||
| Median (range) | 400 (131–1560) | 415 (136–1440) | 529 (254–1198) | .009b | .5 | .1 |
| Mean (SD) | 507 (160) | 479 (255) | 430 (183) | |||
| Radiology, other diagnostics | ||||||
| MR imaging | 82 (14.9) | 14 (20.6) | 24 (47.1) | <.001b | .002b | .22 |
| Electroencephalography | 32 (5.8) | 10 (14.7) | 21 (41.2) | <.001b | .001b | .02b |
| Inpatient care | ||||||
| Hospitalization | 403 (73.1) | 52 (76.5) | 44 (86.3) | .02b | .1 | .54 |
| Time in hospital, d | ||||||
| Median (range) | 6 (1–102) | 8 (1–93) | 14 (1–521) | <.001b | .05b | .005b |
| Mean (SD) | 9 (11) | 14 (18) | 52 (102) | |||
| ICU admission | 15 (2.7) | 9 (13.2) | 12 (23.5) | <.001b | .14 | <.001b |
| Time in the ICU, d | ||||||
| Median (range) | 2 (1–45) | 17 (1–78) | 7 (1–519) | .2 | .38 | .11 |
| Mean (SD) | 9 (14) | 23 (25) | 70 (155) | |||
| Assisted ventilation | 4 (0.7) | 5 (7.4) | 8 (15.7) | <.001b | .15 | <.001b |
| Duration of assisted ventilation, d | ||||||
| Median (range) | 21 (4–35) | 34 (6–40) | 21 (2–609) | .3 | .33 | .48 |
| Mean (SD) | 20 (16) | 29 (16) | 165 (258) | |||
| Case fatalities | 2 (0.4) | 4 (5.9) | 3 (5.9) | .005b | … | .002b |
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CV, completely vaccinated; ICU, intensive care unit; IV, incompletely vaccinated; NV, nonvaccinated; TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
aData represent no. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified.
bSignificant at P < .05.
cAny dose of prednisolone equivalents.
dCombination of ≥2 immunomodulatory therapies.
eOf those with lumbar puncture performed.
Completely vaccinated patients, compared with the nonvaccinated group, were older and had a higher prevalence of underlying comorbid conditions and immunomodulatory therapy. In the completely vaccinated group, a higher proportion of severe infection was observed, as well as higher rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and assisted ventilation and longer hospital stays. In patients with previous vaccinations (both incompletely and completely vaccinated) a biphasic course was less often observed, and these patients were more often treated in the ICU and had a higher case fatality rate (5.9%). Multivariate analysis was performed using nonvaccinated patients as the reference, with adjustment for age, sex, underlying comorbid conditions, and immunomodulatory therapy. Severe disease (aOR, 6.2 [95% CI, 2.4–16.0]), hospitalization >7 days (4.2 [1.8–10.2]), treatment in the ICU (6.6 [2.7–15.9]), and assisted ventilation (12.2 [3.3–44.7]) were significantly associated with being completely vaccinated. Significant association with incomplete vaccination status in the multivariate analysis, still using nonvaccinated patients as the reference, was seen for hospitalization >7 days (aOR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1–4.1]), treatment in the ICU (4.5 [1.8–11.3]), assisted ventilation (8.8 [2.1–36.5]), and fatal outcome (12.6 [2.0–81.3]; Supplementary Table 1).
DISCUSSION
TBE is an emerging infectious disease of substantial public health importance, associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. This is the largest cohort of patients with TBE studied in Sweden. The majority of the patients were previously nonvaccinated, and more cases occurred in men, similarly to findings in other European reports [6, 7, 9]. Fever, headache, and fatigue was the most noted clinical characteristics in the acute phase of disease. Ataxia was the most frequently observed neurological symptom, exceeding what has been previously observed [20, 25].
Many patients with TBE require hospitalization [9]. A recent study from Germany reported a hospitalization rate of almost 90%, higher than the 75% that we observed [26]. The length of hospital stays vary and has been reported at a median between 8–23 days, slightly longer than in our study [7, 26–29]. A median hospitalization of 7 days is comparable to that in previous Swedish cohorts [20, 21]. A significant proportion of patients with TBE are also treated within the intensive care unit (ICU), ranging from 7% to 30%, whereas we noted ICU treatment in about 6% of our cohort [7, 8, 26, 27, 29]. Difficulties in comparing hospitalization rates and lengths of stay between different countries include traditions and recommendations for hospitalizations as well as the number of hospital beds, where Sweden, together with 5 other European Union countries, has the lowest number of beds relative to population size [30].
There are also differences regarding the number of ICU beds and definitions of intensive care. The proportion of patients treated with assisted ventilation in our cohort (3%), is similar to that in other reports [7, 8, 29], potentially making this outcome easier to compare between different hospital settings. There are only a few studies on rehabilitation after TBE. In our cohort, about a fifth of the patients underwent any rehabilitation, similar to the rate in a German study from 1999 [31] but lower than what has been described more recently [26, 32]. Further research is needed on rehabilitation of patients with TBE to understand what best benefits these patients.
A variety of definitions on disease severity is used in studies on TBE. We used a similar classification of severity as used in a prospective study in Lithuania, and we demonstrated a distribution of severe and moderate disease consistent with the findings of that study, about 10% severe and 40% moderate cases [11]. Moreover, the distribution of severity was quite similar to that in previous Swedish studies, [20, 25]. Other studies categorize patients according to their clinical form of disease, where meningitis is comparable to mild disease in the classification used in our study, meningoencephalitis to moderate or severe disease, and meningoencephalomyelitis to severe disease, with distributions ranging from 36%–58% for meningitis, 28%–60% for meningoencephalitis, and 4%–14% for meningoencephalomyelitis [7, 28, 29, 33].
Increasing age has been demonstrated to be correlated with disease severity [8, 11, 26–29, 31, 33]. Here, we found that patients aged ≥50 years were more likely to be hospitalized, hospitalized for a longer period, and admitted to the ICU, as well as treated with assisted ventilation. Of note, there were no deaths among patients <50 years of age. The overall case fatality rate was 1.4%, in accordance with prior reports from Europe and Sweden [6–9, 21, 34]. We found far from negligible case fatality rates in patients ≥50 years old (2.8%), those with underlying comorbid conditions (3.3%), and especially in those receiving immunomodulatory therapy (15.4%). In addition to the higher case fatality rate among patients with underlying comorbid conditions, they had more severe disease, were hospitalized, and were treated in the ICU, including assisted ventilation, to a greater extent than patients without comorbid conditions.
Comorbid conditions have previously been found to be one of the prognostic factors associated with severe disease and severe meningoencephalitis [8]. A similar pattern of more severe disease and increased healthcare utilization was observed in patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy; however, the considerably high rate of fatal outcomes in this group is particularly noteworthy. Case fatality was also the only variable associated with immunomodulatory treatment in the multivariate analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the outcomes of TBE in patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy, even if multiple case reports have shown fatal TBE infection in immunosuppressed patients [35–37]. Our findings are implicative of a need for heightened vigilance in patients with TBE receiving immunomodulatory therapy and in those with comorbid conditions, as well as in those who are older.
Of the 10 patients who died, 8 were men, but the association with sex was present only for moderate disease and hospitalization. Similarly, in prior studies, disease severity did not differ by sex [26], nor was it associated with any specific clinical diagnoses [7]. In contrast, one study demonstrated that male sex was a risk factor for meningoencephalitis and meningoencephaloradiculatis [33]. Hence, there are somewhat conflicting results regarding a more severe outcome in men, and it remains unclear why men are affected by TBE to a greater extent than women.
We aimed to collect data for up to 12 months after onset of disease, but only 11% of the patients in our cohort had follow-up visits at the hospitals after 6 months. A high rate of the patients who were followed up reported persisting symptoms, mostly cognitive disturbances and headache, but also ataxia and spinal nerve paresis, similarly to reports in previous studies, although the frequency of long-term symptoms in our cohort is somewhat higher than what has been previously described [7, 10, 11, 21, 25, 31, 38, 39]. These findings could indicate the bias of including only hospital-based visits. In addition, the dropout of patients throughout the follow-up period may have had an increasing effect on the rates of sequelae, as it is likely that patients with persisting symptoms have further visits planned and may be more willing to adhere to them.
Vaccination breakthrough infection has been described in older patients [17, 40] and with a severe course of disease [13, 17, 27, 40], whereas no differences in age and disease severity have been found in other studies [7, 41]. In our study, a total of 119 patients had been previously vaccinated against TBE, of whom 51 had adhered to the recommended vaccination schedule. The previously completely vaccinated patients were older, had more comorbid conditions and immunomodulatory medications, had more severe disease, and were hospitalized to a greater extent and for longer, compared with both previously nonvaccinated and incompletely vaccinated patients. Strikingly, both completely and incompletely vaccinated patients, compared with nonvaccinated patients, were admitted to the ICU and treated with assisted ventilation to a greater extent, together with having a higher case fatality rate. With increased numbers of people vaccinated against the disease, an increasing number of vaccination breakthrough infections will be diagnosed, and it is thus important to understand these infections.
Importantly, our study was not designed to identify all breakthrough infections that occur, as we identified only patients seeking hospital care. As for our cohort, there is also most likely a diagnostic bias in the vaccination breakthrough population, as this group is more difficult to diagnose given that the current cornerstone for diagnosis of TBE is based on serology [42]. Patients with less severe breakthrough infection would thus not be diagnosed with TBE. In addition, the declining priming vaccination response in older and immunosuppressed individuals will inevitably lead to more breakthrough infections in these groups, as with other vaccines and diseases [43–45]. Given the selected cohort, our findings cannot find associations between vaccination per se and worsened outcome but rather underline the importance of initializing TBE immunization early in life, for optimal priming and before immunosenescence due to older age or potential immunomodulatory treatment.
Recent data on TBE virus (TBEV) infection and vaccination rates in Region Stockholm, based on serological assessment in blood donors, suggest that 874 500 people (57%) in Region Stockholm are vaccinated against the disease and 107 400 (7%) have had the infection, as assessed with whole-virus and NS1 multiplex assay [46], leaving the risk of clinically detectable vaccination breakthrough infections to very low levels, which would be in accordance with the high real-world effectiveness of available TBE vaccines [47]. Similar data on high incidence of predominantly silent TBEV infections (5.6% TBEV NS1 IgG seroprevalence) have been described in southwestern Germany [48].
This study has several limitations, including the retrospective design based on the assessment of medical records and the fact that patients included in the study were all examined at and/or treated in a hospital, excluding patients with milder disease who were handled at primary care centers. Consequently, only a selection of the TBEV-infected, especially patients who were more severely ill, was included in this study. Likewise, concerning sequelae, since we studied patients only with follow-up visits at a hospital we may have observed only the more severely affected patients with TBE.
A main strength of the current study is that the mandatory notifying system for TBE cases, with retrieval of medical records for 703 of the 704 reported cases, allowed for sound data collection and analysis. We also had access to detailed information on vaccinations for the majority of the patients.
In conclusion, TBE is associated with a high morbidity rate and risk of sequelae. The overall case fatality rate is relatively low but is considerable in older patients, in patients with underlying comorbid conditions, and especially in patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy. Severe TBE is associated with age ≥50 years, with underlying comorbid conditions, and with vaccination breakthrough infection. These findings can contribute to clinical practice and the care of patients with TBE and provide a base for the further assessment needed to understand the mechanisms of severe disease.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at The Journal of Infectious Diseases online (http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/). Supplementary materials consist of data provided by the author that are published to benefit the reader. The posted materials are not copyedited. The contents of all supplementary data are the sole responsibility of the authors. Questions or messages regarding errors should be addressed to the author.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Sofia Bartholdsson, Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria-Pia Hergens, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin E Hansson, Department of Infectious Diseases, Södersjukhuset Stockholm, Sweden.
Josef Ragnarsson, Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.
Peter Hodosi, Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ismail Kus, Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mona Insulander, Department of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sirkka Vene, The Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
Lars Lindquist, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helena H Askling, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Academic Specialist Centre, Stockholm Health Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara Gredmark-Russ, Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå, Sweden.
Notes
Author contributions. S. B., M-P. H., H. H. A., and S. G.-R. conceived and designed the study. S. B., M-P. H., K. E. H., J. R., P. H., I. K., M. I., H. H. A., and S. G.-R. were responsible for data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. S. B. and S. G.-R. wrote the manuscript, with support from M-P. H., K. E. H., J. R., P. H., I. K., M. I., S. V., L. L., and H. H. A. All authors approved the manuscript for publication.
Financial support. This work was supported by Region Stockholm (ALF project and Clinical Research Appointment); the Center for Innovative Medicine, Region Stockholm; the Swedish Research Council (Diary Number 2020-06249 and 2021-06602); and the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation (all to S. G.-R.).
References
- 1. Süss J. Tick-borne encephalitis 2010: epidemiology, risk areas, and virus strains in Europe and Asia—an overview. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2011; 2:2–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lindquist L, Vapalahti O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet 2008; 371:1861–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Martello E, Gillingham EL, Phalkey R, et al. Systematic review on the non-vectorial transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEv). Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2022; 13:102028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ruzek D, Avšič Županc T, Borde J, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe and Russia: review of pathogenesis, clinical features, therapy, and vaccines. Antiviral Res 2019; 164:23–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chiffi G, Grandgirard D, Leib SL, Chrdle A, Růžek D. Tick-borne encephalitis: a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, virology, and clinical picture. Rev Med Virol 2023; 33:e2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bogovic P, Strle F. Tick-borne encephalitis: a review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3:430–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kohlmaier B, Schweintzger NA, Sagmeister MG, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with tick-borne encephalitis (TBE): a European Multicentre Study from 2010 to 2017. Microorganisms 2021; 9:1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Radzišauskienė D, Urbonienė J, Kaubrys G, et al. The epidemiology, clinical presentation, and predictors of severe tick-borne encephalitis in Lithuania, a highly endemic country: a retrospective study of 1040 patients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Beauté J, Spiteri G, Warns-Petit E, Zeller H. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe, 2012 to 2016. Euro Surveill 2018; 23:1800201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bogovič P, Stupica D, Rojko T, et al. The long-term outcome of tick-borne encephalitis in Central Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2018; 9:369–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mickienė A, Laiškonis A, Günther G, Vene S, Lundkvist A, Lindquist L. Tickborne encephalitis in an area of high endemicity in Lithuania: disease severity and long-term prognosis. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35:650–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Czupryna P, Grygorczuk S, Krawczuk K, et al. Sequelae of tick-borne encephalitis in retrospective analysis of 1072 patients. Epidemiol Infect 2018; 146:1663–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Santonja I, Stiasny K, Essl A, Heinz FX, Kundi M, Holzmann H. Tick-borne encephalitis in vaccinated patients: a retrospective case-control study and analysis of vaccination field effectiveness in Austria from 2000 to 2018. J Infect Dis 2023; 227:512–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Heinz FX, Stiasny K, Holzmann H, et al. Vaccination and tick-borne encephalitis, central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2013; 19:69–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lindblom P, Wilhelmsson P, Fryland L, et al. Factors determining immunological response to vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis virus in older individuals. PLoS One 2014; 9:e100860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Weinberger B, Keller M, Fischer KH, et al. Decreased antibody titers and booster responses in tick-borne encephalitis vaccinees aged 50–90 years. Vaccine 2010; 28:3511–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hansson KE, Rosdahl A, Insulander M, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis vaccine failures: a 10-year retrospective study supporting the rationale for adding an extra priming dose in individuals starting at age 50 years. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 70:245–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dobler G, Gniel D, Petermann R, Pfeffer M. Epidemiology and distribution of tick-borne encephalitis. Wien Med Wochenschr 2012; 162:230–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Slunge D, Boman A, Studahl M. Burden of tick-borne encephalitis, Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:314–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Günther G, Haglund M, Lindquist L, Forsgren M, Sköldenberg B. Tick-bone encephalitis in Sweden in relation to aseptic meningo-encephalitis of other etiology: a prospective study of clinical course and outcome. J Neurol 1997; 244:230–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Haglund M, Forsgren M, Lindh G, Lindquist L. A 10-year follow-up study of tick-borne encephalitis in the Stockholm area and a review of the literature: need for a vaccination strategy. Scand J Infect Dis 1996; 28:217–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Haglund M, Günther G. Tick-borne encephalitis-pathogenesis, clinical course and long-term follow-up. Vaccine 2003; 21(suppl 1):S11–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. The Public Health Agency of Sweden . Falldefinitioner vid anmälan enligt smittskyddslagen. https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/d109fac1689846edxb6ce7292c0588e39/falldefinitioner-anmalan-smittskyddslagen.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2024.
- 24. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . Decisions. Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/945 of 22 June 2018 on the communicable diseases and related special health issues to be covered by epidemiological surveillance as well as relevant case definitions. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018D0945&from=EN#page=45. Accessed 25 April 2024.
- 25. Veje M, Nolskog P, Petzold M, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis sequelae at long-term follow-up: a self-reported case-control study. Acta Neurol Scand 2016; 134:434–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Nygren TM, Pilic A, Böhmer MM, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis: acute clinical manifestations and severity in 581 cases from Germany, 2018–2020. J Infect 2023; 86:369–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bogovič P, Lotrič-Furlan S, Avšič-Županc T, Lusa L, Strle F. Factors associated with severity of tick-borne encephalitis: a prospective observational study. Travel Med Infect Dis 2018; 26:25–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Czupryna P, Moniuszko A, Pancewicz SA, Grygorczuk S, Kondrusik M, Zajkowska J. Tick-borne encephalitis in Poland in years 1993–2008—epidemiology and clinical presentation: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18:673–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Logar M, Bogovič P, Cerar D, Avšič-Županc T, Strle F. Tick-borne encephalitis in Slovenia from 2000 to 2004: comparison of the course in adult and elderly patients. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2006; 118:702–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eurostat Healthcare resource statistics—beds. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Healthcare_resource_statistics_-_beds#Hospital_beds. Accessed 25 April 2024.
- 31. Kaiser R. The clinical and epidemiological profile of tick-borne encephalitis in southern Germany 1994–98: a prospective study of 656 patients. Brain 1999; 122:2067–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nygren TM, Pilic A, Böhmer MM, Wagner-Wiening C, Wichmann O, Hellenbrand W. Recovery and sequelae in 523 adults and children with tick-borne encephalitis in Germany. Infection 2023; 51:1503–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lenhard T, Ott D, Jakob NJ, et al. Predictors, neuroimaging characteristics and long-term outcome of severe European tick-borne encephalitis: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Varnaitė R, Gredmark-Russ S, Klingström J. Deaths from tick-borne encephalitis, Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:1471–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lipowski D, Popiel M, Perlejewski K, et al. A cluster of fatal tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in organ transplant setting. J Infect Dis 2017; 215:896–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Knight A, Pauksens K, Nordmark G, Kumlien E. Fatal outcome of tick-borne encephalitis in two patients with rheumatic disease treated with rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56:855–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Czarnowska A, Groth M, Okrzeja J, et al. A fatal case of tick-borne encephalitis in an immunocompromised patient: case report from Northeastern Poland and review of literature. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2024; 15:102273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Karelis G, Bormane A, Logina I, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Latvia 1973–2009: epidemiology, clinical features and sequelae. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19:62–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kaiser R. Tick-borne encephalitis: clinical findings and prognosis in adults. Wien Med Wochenschr 2012; 162:239–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lotrič-Furlan S, Bogovič P, Avšič-Županc T, Jelovšek M, Lusa L, Strle F. Tick-borne encephalitis in patients vaccinated against this disease. J Intern Med 2017; 282:142–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dobler G, Kaier K, Hehn P, Böhmer MM, Kreusch TM, Borde JP. Tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccination breakthrough infections in Germany: a retrospective analysis from 2001 to 2018. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26:1090.e7–e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Holzmann H, Kundi M, Stiasny K, et al. Correlation between ELISA, hemagglutination inhibition, and neutralization tests after vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. J Med Virol 1996; 48:102–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Brockman MA, Mwimanzi F, Lapointe HR, et al. Reduced magnitude and durability of humoral immune responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines among older adults. J Infect Dis 2022; 225:1129–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Song JY, Cheong HJ, Hwang IS, et al. Long-term immunogenicity of influenza vaccine among the elderly: risk factors for poor immune response and persistence. Vaccine 2010; 28:3929–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hertzell KB, Pauksens K, Rombo L, Knight A, Vene S, Askling HH. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine to medically immunosuppressed patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective, open-label, multi-centre study. Vaccine 2016; 34:650–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Albinsson B, Hoffman T, Kolstad L, et al. Seroprevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus and vaccination coverage of tick-borne encephalitis, Sweden, 2018 to 2019. Euro Surveill 2024; 29:2300221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Angulo FJ, Zhang P, Halsby K, et al. A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of tick-borne encephalitis vaccines in Europe. Vaccine 2023; 41:6914–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Euringer K, Girl P, Kaier K, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus IgG antibody surveillance: vaccination- and infection-induced seroprevalences, south-western Germany, 2021. Euro Surveill 2023; 28:2200408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


