Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1991 Jun;437:95–108. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018586

The two power limits conditioning step frequency in human running.

G A Cavagna 1, P A Willems 1, P Franzetti 1, C Detrembleur 1
PMCID: PMC1180038  PMID: 1890660

Abstract

1. At high running speeds, the step frequency becomes lower than the apparent natural frequency of the body's bouncing system. This is due to a relative increase of the vertical component of the muscular push and requires a greater power to maintain the motion of the centre of gravity, Wext. However, the reduction of the step frequency leads to a decrease of the power to accelerate the limbs relatively to the centre of gravity, Wint, and, possibly, of the total power Wtot = Wext + Wint. 2. In this study we measured Wext using a force platform, Wint by motion picture analysis, and calculated Wtot during human running at six given speeds (from 5 to 21 km h-1) maintained with different step frequencies dictated by a metronome. The power was calculated by dividing the positive work done at each step by the duration of the step (step-average power) and by the duration of the positive work phase (push-average power). 3. Also in running, as in walking, a change of the step frequency at a given speed has opposite effects on Wext, which decreases with increasing step frequency, and Wint, which increases with frequency; in addition, a step frequency exists at which Wtot reaches a minimum. However, the frequency for a minimum of Wtot decreases with speed in running, whereas it increases with speed in walking. This is true for both the step-average and the push-average powers. 4. The frequency minimizing the step-average power equals the freely chosen step frequency at about 13 km h-1: it is higher at lower speeds and lower at higher speeds. The frequency minimizing the push-average power approaches the freely chosen step frequency at high speeds (around 22 km h-1 for our subjects). 5. It is concluded that the increase of the vertical push does reduce the step-average power, but that a limit is set by the increase of the push-average power. Between 13 and 22 km h-1 the freely chosen step frequency is intermediate between a frequency minimizing the step-average power, eventually limited by the maximum oxygen intake (aerobic power), and a frequency minimizing the push-average power, set free by the muscle immediately during contraction (anaerobic power). The first need prevails at the lower speed, the second at the higher speed.

Full text

PDF
95

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander R. M., Ker R. F. Locomotion. Running is priced by the step. Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):220–221. doi: 10.1038/346220a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blickhan R. The spring-mass model for running and hopping. J Biomech. 1989;22(11-12):1217–1227. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90224-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavagna G. A. Force platforms as ergometers. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Jul;39(1):174–179. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1975.39.1.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavagna G. A., Franzetti P., Fuchimoto T. The mechanics of walking in children. J Physiol. 1983 Oct;343:323–339. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavagna G. A., Franzetti P., Heglund N. C., Willems P. The determinants of the step frequency in running, trotting and hopping in man and other vertebrates. J Physiol. 1988 May;399:81–92. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavagna G. A., Franzetti P. The determinants of the step frequency in walking in humans. J Physiol. 1986 Apr;373:235–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavagna G. A., Kaneko M. Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):467–-81. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cavagna G. A., Thys H., Zamboni A. The sources of external work in level walking and running. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):639–657. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavanagh P. R., Williams K. R. The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(1):30–35. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198201000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kram R., Taylor C. R. Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):265–267. doi: 10.1038/346265a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. OTIS A. B., FENN W. O., RAHN H. Mechanics of breathing in man. J Appl Physiol. 1950 May;2(11):592–607. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1950.2.11.592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES