Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2003 Mar 13;72(4):1053–1057. doi: 10.1086/374383

Significant Linkage of Parkinson Disease to Chromosome 2q36-37

Nathan Pankratz 1, William C Nichols 2, Sean K Uniacke 2, Cheryl Halter 1, Alice Rudolph 3, Cliff Shults 4,5, P Michael Conneally 1, Tatiana Foroud 1; the Parkinson Study Group*
PMCID: PMC1180337  PMID: 12638082

Abstract

Parkinson disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, surpassed in frequency only by Alzheimer disease. Elsewhere we have reported linkage to chromosome 2q in a sample of sibling pairs with PD. We have now expanded our sample to include 150 families meeting our strictest diagnostic definition of verified PD. To further delineate the chromosome 2q linkage, we have performed analyses using only those pedigrees with the strongest family history of PD. Linkage analyses in this subset of 65 pedigrees generated a LOD score of 5.1, which was obtained using an autosomal dominant model of disease transmission. This result strongly suggests that variation in a gene on chromosome 2q36-37 contributes to PD susceptibility.


Parkinson disease (PD [MIM 168600]) is a common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting 3% of those >75 years of age (de Rijk et al. 1997). It is associated with resting tremor, postural rigidity, and progressive accumulation of protein inclusions containing ubiquitin and α-synuclein in the substantia nigra. The first causative PD mutation was identified in the α-synuclein gene on chromosome 4; however, only two mutations in a very small number of families have thus far been reported (Gwinn-Hardy 2002). Subsequently, mutations in the parkin gene on chromosome 6 were reported to result in autosomal recessive, juvenile parkinsonism (ARJP [MIM 600116]). Mutations in this gene may account for PD in as many as 50% of familial cases of ARJP (Lücking et al. 2000) and may also result in individuals with idiopathic late-onset PD, particularly those with a positive family history (Foroud et al. 2003). Recently, mutations in the DJ-1 gene on chromosome 1q were found to result in autosomal recessive, early-onset PD (Bonifati et al. 2002). In addition, linkage to four other chromosomal regions has been reported in families segregating either an autosomal dominant or an autosomal recessive form of PD; however, the causative genes have not yet been identified (Gwinn-Hardy 2002). We have recently identified linkage to chromosome 2q36–37 in a sample of 170 affected sibling pairs (Pankratz et al. 2002).

To identify susceptibility genes for PD, affected sibling pairs and more extended multiplex families with PD were recruited through the movement-disorder specialists of the Parkinson Study Group (PSG), a network of 60 centers located throughout North America. During an in-person study visit, the Diagnostic Checklist (Nichols et al. 2002; Pankratz et al. 2002) was completed by the neurologist; inclusion criteria consisted of clinical features highly associated with autopsy-confirmed PD, and exclusion criteria consisted of features highly associated with other non-PD pathological diagnoses (Hughes et al. 1992a, 1992b). Responses on the Diagnostic Checklist were used to classify study participants as having verified PD (417 subjects) or nonverified PD (163 subjects). Peripheral blood was obtained from all individuals after they completed the appropriate written informed consent form approved by each center's institutional review board.

A marker in intron 7 of the parkin gene (D6S305) was genotyped to identify families more likely to have a mutation in this known PD-susceptibility gene. Families having a positive LOD score at this marker (as determined using an autosomal recessive model of disease inheritance [n=94]), along with families that included at least one affected individual with an age at onset ⩽50 years (n=66; overlap n=30), were screened for parkin mutations, using both direct sequencing and fluorescent-dosage PCR analysis (Nichols et al. 2002). Linkage analyses on chromosome 2 were performed with and without the 47 families determined to have parkin mutations.

Thirty dinucleotide repeat markers from the ABI Prism Linkage Mapping Set (Applied Biosystems), with an average heterozygosity of 80% and an average intermarker spacing of 8.7 cM, were genotyped on chromosome 2. Marker order and the genetic distances between markers were estimated from the sex-averaged genetic maps from Marshfield Genetic Laboratory, ABI (ABI Linkage Mapping Set 2), and deCode (Kong et al. 2002). The maximum LOD score was within 0.01 for all analyses using the different maps. Therefore, only results obtained using the maps generated from Marshfield are reported. PCR amplification was performed for each of the markers, and the products were separated by electrophoresis, using an ABI 3700 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Genotypes were determined by Genescan 3.5, Genotyper 3.6, and Genemapper 2.0 software. Mendelian errors in the genotypic data were detected using the program PedCheck (O’Connell and Weeks 1998), and the marker genotypic data were used to verify all reported family relationships among the subjects, using the computer program Relative (Goring and Ott 1997). Allele frequencies were estimated from the full PD cohort of 1,352 chromosomes, using the Userm13 module from the Mendel software package (Lange et al. 1988). Nonparametric multipoint LOD scores were calculated using Mapmaker/Sibs (Kruglyak and Lander 1995).

We previously reported evidence of linkage to chromosome 2q (LOD = 3.1) in a sample of 104 families in which the affected individuals met the strictest diagnosis of PD (i.e., verified PD) (table 1; Pankratz et al. 2002). This sample included 90 families without a parkin mutation and 14 families with mutations in one or both parkin alleles. We have subsequently ascertained an additional 96 individuals from 46 families that meet our strictest diagnostic criteria. These families provide additional evidence of linkage to chromosome 2q36-37. Combined analyses of the 150 families yielded suggestive evidence of linkage in the region of three adjacent markers (D2S396, D2S206, and D2S338) and a resulting maximum LOD score of 3.5 (table 1). A total of 25 families with parkin mutations were identified in the initial and subsequently ascertained samples, including 14 families with a mutation in only one of their two parkin alleles, three families with homozygous parkin mutations, and eight families whose members were compound heterozygotes. When the 25 families with mutations in the parkin gene were removed from the sample, the LOD score was reduced to 2.5. The increased LOD score that resulted from the inclusion of the families that were positive for the parkin mutation may suggest a potential epistatic or additive interaction between the parkin gene and a chromosome 2q susceptibility locus. Most reported parkin mutations have been found only in patients with PD, but at least one of the mutations observed in our cohort (Ser167Asn) has been observed in a few control individuals who did not have PD (Oliveri et al. 2001). Therefore, it is possible that a mutation in only one of the two parkin alleles is not sufficient to cause PD. Rather, a mutation in a second PD susceptibility locus may be required for manifestation of disease.

Table 1.

Demographic Information and LOD Scores for Families with Verified PD

No. of
LOD Score
Sample Families SiblingPairs % Male Mean ± SDAge at Onset(years) Including Familieswith parkin Mutations Excluding Familieswith parkin Mutations
Original 104 116 61 60.4 ± 11.8 3.05a 1.87a
Expanded 150 170 60 60.0 ± 12.1 3.51a 2.47a
Strong family history 65 77 57 58.0 ± 12.2 5.14b 4.12b
a

Nonparametric LOD scores computed with Mapmaker/Sibs.

b

Parametric LOD scores computed using an autosomal dominant model with 80% penetrance, 0.005 disease allele frequency, and a 3% phenocopy rate.

Subsequent analyses were designed to further elucidate the role of the chromosome 2q susceptibility locus. A subset of families was identified that met the strictest diagnostic criteria of verified PD and also had a stronger family history of PD. We defined this subset as those families having at least four first-, second-, or third-degree relatives reported to have PD but not necessarily examined (n=40 families) and those families that included an affected sibling pair who also had a parent reportedly diagnosed with PD (n=49). The overlap between these two groups was substantial (n=24). A total of 65 families with verified PD were thus identified who were considered to have a more extensive family history. On the basis of the results of the previous analyses suggesting a potential interaction between parkin and the locus on 2q, kindreds meeting these family history criteria were included in the analysis regardless of the presence or absence of a parkin mutation(s).

It has been shown that employing a single-gene model for a disease with potentially complex inheritance can result in a potential gain in power, even if the disease model is incorrectly specified (Abreu et al. 1999; Hodge et al. 2002). Therefore, after review of our families with a strong family history of PD, an autosomal dominant model of PD susceptibility was postulated with 80% penetrance, a disease allele frequency of 0.005, and a 3% phenocopy rate. Two-point LOD scores were calculated using the MLINK program of the LINKAGE software package (Lathrop and Lalouel 1984). This model yielded a maximum two-point LOD score of 3.0 for θ=0 at marker D2S206. As with the nonparametric analyses, the flanking markers D2S396 (LOD=2.9) and D2S338 (LOD=2.4) also provided evidence of linkage under this model. The program Allegro (Gudbjartsson et al. 2000) was then used to perform multipoint linkage analysis, using this same parametric disease model. A maximum multipoint LOD score of 5.1 was computed at the marker D2S206 (fig. 1). Variation in marker allele frequencies resulted in only minor changes in the maximum LOD score. The 11 families positive for parkin mutation contributed a summed LOD score of 1.0. Given this relatively small sample of parkin-positive families with verified PD, it will be important to further study parkin-positive families to test whether there is evidence for an epistatic or additive interaction between the parkin locus and a PD susceptibility gene on chromosome 2q.

Figure 1.

Figure  1

Autosomal dominant multipoint LOD score plot for the 65 families with a strong family history of PD

Elsewhere, linkage to an autosomal dominant PD locus on chromosome 2p (PARK3 [MIM 602404]) was identified in a sample of families of European origin (Gasser et al. 1998). More recently, analyses of affected sibling pairs provided evidence that the PARK3 locus might affect age at onset in late-onset PD (DeStefano et al. 2002). However, our linkage to 2q36-37 is ∼140 cM away and therefore represents linkage to a gene that is distinct from the PARK3 locus.

In summary, our data provide strong evidence that a susceptibility gene for PD is located within a 20-cM region near the q terminus of chromosome 2. Future studies will focus on identifying genes in this chromosomal region, which might be tested as candidates for their role in PD susceptibility.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 NS37167. We thank the subjects for their participation in this research study. Parkinson Study Group Investigators are as follows: Steering Committee—Lawrence Golbe, M.D., UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, NJ; William Koller, M.D., Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York; Kelly Lyons, Ph.D., University of Miami, Miami; Karen Marder, M.D., Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York; Frederick Marshall, M.D., David Oakes, Ph.D., and Alice Rudolph, Ph.D., University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Cliff Shults, M.D., University of California San Diego, San Diego; Aileen Shinaman, J.D., University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; and Eric Siemers, Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis. Participating Investigators and Coordinators—Joanne Wojcieszek, M.D., and Joann Belden, R.N., Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; Julie Carter, R.N., M.N., A.N.P., Richard Camicioli, M.D., and Pamela Andrews, R.N., Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR; Magali Fernandez, M.D., Jean Hubble, M.D., and Carson Reider, Ph.D., Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ali Rajput, M.D., Alex Rajput, M.D., and Theresa Shirley, R.N., Saskatoon Health District Board, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Michel Panisset, M.D., and Jean Hall, R.N., McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Quebec, Canada; Tilak Mendis, M.D., David A. Grimes, M.D., and Peggy Gray, R.N., B.S.C.N., Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Carmen Serrano Ramos, M.D., Sandra Roque, R.N., University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico; Stephen Reich, M.D., and Becky Dunlop, R.N., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Robert Hauser, M.D., Juan Sanchez-Ramos, M.D., Theresa Zesiewicz, M.D., and Holly Delgado, R.N., University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Joseph Friedman, M.D., Hubert Fernandez, M.D., and Margaret Lannon, R.N., M.S., Brown University, Pawtucket, RI; Lauren Seeberger, M.D., Christopher O’Brien, M.D., and Deborah Judd, R.N., Colorado Neurological Institute, Englewood, CO; Lawrence Elmer, M.D., Ph.D., Kathy Davis, R.N., M.S.N., Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, OH; Cliff Shults, M.D., and Deborah Fontaine, R.N.C., G.N.P., University of California San Diego, San Diego; Ronald Pfeiffer, M.D., and Brenda Pfeiffer, R.N., B.S.N., University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, TN; Michael Aminoff, M.D., F.R.C.P., and Mariann DiMinno, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; Daniel Truong, M.D., Mayank Pathak, M.D., and Anhoa Tran, R.N., Parkinson’s and Movement Disorder Institute, Fountain Valley, CA; Robert Rodnitzky, M.D., and Judith Dobson, R.N., University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Rajesh Pahwa, M.D., and Stephanie Thomas, L.P.N., Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; Danna Jennings, M.D., Kenneth Marek, M.D., and Susan Mendick, M.P.H., Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT; Karen Marder, M.D., and Juliette Harris, M.S., Ph.D., Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York; William Koller, M.D., William Weiner, M.D., and Kelly Lyons, Ph.D., University of Miami, Miami; Roger Kurlan, M.D., and Debra Berry, M.S.N., N.P., University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Peter Lewitt, M.D., and Maryan DeAngelis, R.N., Clinical Neuroscience Center, West Bloomfield, MI; Paul Tuite, M.D., and Robyn Schacherer, R.N., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Wayne Martin, M.D., and Marguerite Wieler, B.S.C., P.T., University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Bala Manyam, M.D., and Patricia Simpson, R.N., B.S.N, Scott & White Hospital/Texas A&M University, Temple, TX; John Bertoni, M.D., Ph.D., and Carolyn Peterson, R.N., Creighton University, Omaha; Mark F. Gordon, M.D., and Joanna Hamann, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY; Joseph Jankovic, M.D., and Christine Hunter, R.N., Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Stewart Factor, D.O., and Sharon Evans, L.P.N., Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; Anette Nieves, M.D., and Julie So, R.N., Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto; Mark Stacy, M.D., and Kelli Williamson, R.N., Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix; Francis Walker, M.D., and Victoria Hunt, R.N., Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Un Jung Kang, M.D., and Shirley Uy, University of Chicago, Chicago; Karen Blindauer, M.D., and Jeannine Petit, C.N.R.N., G.N.P.C., Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; David Simon, M.D., and Lisa Scollins, R.N., Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; Rachel Saunders Pullman, M.D., and Karyn Boyar R.N.C, M.S., F.N.P., Beth Israel Medical Center, New York; Paul Gordon, M.D., and Joan Werner, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque; Brad Racette, M.D., and Laura Good, R.N., Washington University, St. Louis; Miodrag Velickovic, M.D., and Sabrina Phipps, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York; Arif Dalvi, M.D., and Donna Schweiterman M.A., C.C.R.C., University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati; Maureen Leehey, M.D., and Sharon Culver, A.N.P., University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver; Mandar Jog, M.D., Ph.D., and Cheryl Horn, R.N., London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada; Jayaraman Rao, M.D., Maureen Cook, R.N., B.S.N., Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans; Kapil Sethi, M.D., and Joan Carpenter, R.N., Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA; Paul Atchison, M.D., and Cathy Allen, R.N., B.S.N., University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham; Lewis Sudarsky, M.D., Claire Corwin, P.A.C., B.S., Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston; Tanya Simuni, M.D., and Michele Wolff B.A., Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago; Richard Dewey, M.D., and Melinda Jones, R.N., B.S.N., University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Neal Hermanowicz, M.D., and Cheryl Dutton, R.N., M.S., University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; G. David Podskalny, M.D., and Lisa Giffin, L.P.N., University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Stratford, NJ; Andrew Feigin, M.D., and Barbara Shannon, R.N., North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY; Vincent Calabrese, M.D., and Peggy Roberge, R.N., Hunter Homes McGuire Veterans Medical Center, Richmond, VA; James Sutton, M.D., and Brad Hutchinson, C.C.R.C., California Medical Clinic for Movement Disorders, Oxnard, CA; Lisa Shulman, M.D., and Kelly Dustin, R.N., University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore; Todd Ajax, M.D., and Janet Mannetter, R.N., McFarland Clinic, Mary Greely Hospital, Ames, IA; Oksana Suchowersky, M.D., and Mary Lou Klimek, R.N., B.N., M.A., University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and Ryan Uitti, M.D., and Margaret Foster Turk, R.N., Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL. Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Coordination Center’s Staff—David Oakes, Ph.D., Arthur Watts, B.S., Antai Wang, M.A., Tori Ross, M.A., Susan Bennett, A.A.S., Elaine Julian-Baros, and Susan Daigneault, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

Electronic-Database Information

URLs for data presented herein are as follows:

  1. Applied Biosystems, http://home.appliedbiosystems.com
  2. Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation http://research.marshfieldclinic.org/genetics/
  3. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for ARJP, PD, and PARK3)

References

  1. Abreu P, Greenberg DA, Hodge SE (1999) Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases. Am J Hum Genet 65:847–857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonifati V, Rizzu P, Van Baren MJ, Schaap O, Breedveld GJ, Krieger E, Dekker MC, Squitieri F, Ibanez P, Joosse M, Van Dongen JW, Vanacore N, Van Swieten JC, Brice A, Meco G, Van Duijn CM, Oostra BA, Heutink P (2003) Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early-onset parkinsonism. Science 299:256–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. de Rijk MC, Tzourio C, Breteler MM, Dartigues JF, Amaducci L, Lopez-Pousa S, Manubens-Bertran JM, Alperovitch A, Rocca WA (1997) Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study. European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 62:10–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeStefano AL, Lew MF, Golbe LI, Mark MH, Lazzarini AM, Guttman M, Montgomery E, et al (2002) PARK3 influences age at onset in Parkinson disease: a genome scan in the GenePD study. Am J Hum Genet 70:1089–1095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foroud T, Uniacke SK, Liu L, Pankratz N, Rudolph A, Halter C, Shults C, Marder K, Conneally PM, Nichols WC, the Parkinson Study Group (2003) Heterozygosity for a mutation in the parkin gene leads to later onset Parkinson Disease. Neurology 60:796–801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gasser T, Müller-Myhsok B, Wszolek ZK, Oehlmann R, Calne DB, Bonifati V, Bereznai B, Fabrizio E, Vieregge P, Horstmann RD (1998) A susceptibility locus for Parkinson’s disease maps to chromosome 2p13. Nat Genet 18:262–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goring HH, Ott J (1997) Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases. Eur J Hum Genet 5:69–77 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gudbjartsson DF, Jonasson K, Frigge M, Kong A (2000) Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis. Nat Genet 25:12–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gwinn-Hardy K (2002) Genetics of parkinsonism. Mov Disord 17:645–656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hodge SE, Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA (2002) HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet 70:556–558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes AJ, Ben-Schlomo Y, Daniel SE, Lees AJ (1992a) What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson’s disease: a clinicopathologic study. Neurology 42:1142–1146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992b) Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 55:181–184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardsson B, Sigurdardottir S, Barnard J, Hallbeck B, Masson G, Shlien A, Palsson ST, Frigge ML, Thorgeirsson TE, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K (2002) A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet 31:241–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kruglyak L, Lander ES (1995) Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 57:439–454 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M (1988) Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genet Epidemiol 5:471–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lathrop GM, Lalouel JM (1984) Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. Am J Hum Genet 36:460–465 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lücking CB, Durr A, Bonifati V, Vaughan J, De Michele G, Gasser T, Harhangi BS, Meco G, Denefle P, Wood NW, Agid Y, Brice A (2000) Association between early-onset Parkinson’s disease and mutations in the Parkin gene: French Parkinson’s Disease Genetics Study Group. N Engl J Med 342:1560–1567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nichols WC, Pankratz N, Uniacke SK, Pauciulo MW, Halter C, Rudolph A, Conneally PM, Foroud T, the Parkinson Study Group (2002) Linkage stratification and mutation analysis at the parkin locus identifies mutation positive, Parkinson disease families. J Med Genet 39:489–492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. O’Connell JR, Weeks DE (1998) PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 63:259–266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Oliveri RL, Zappia M, Annesi G, Bosco D, Annesi F, Spadafora P, Pasqua AA, Tomaino C, Nicoletti G, Pirritano D, Labate A, Gambardella A, Logroscino G, Manobianca G, Epifanio A, Morgante L, Savettieri G, Quattrone A (2001) The parkin gene is not involved in late-onset Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 57:359–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pankratz N, Nichols WC, Uniacke SK, Halter C, Rudolph A, Shults C, Conneally PM, Foroud T, the Parkinson Study Group (2002) Genome screen to identify susceptibility genes for Parkinson disease in a sample without parkin mutations. Am J Hum Genet 71:124–135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES