Skip to main content
Future Healthcare Journal logoLink to Future Healthcare Journal
. 2025 Jan 10;12(1):100222. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100222

Embedding into the ways of working in the NHS: A seamless transition and reflective learning as a clinical observer in general internal medicine

George I Varughese a,, Jovito James a, Athira Mukunda a, Rhea Jacob a, Victoria Burnham b
PMCID: PMC11804547  PMID: 39926478

Abstract

The transition of embedding into the National Health Service (NHS) healthcare system in the UK is accompanied by significant social, cultural and educational challenges. The common educational barriers faced by international medical graduates (IMGs) are usually related to lack of appreciation of the values and structure of the NHS as well as understanding the ethical and medicolegal issues. Clinical observer roles or attachments are an opportunity for doctors who are IMGs to gain direct experience of the NHS system, enhancing their knowledge of the ways of working in the UK, and thereby improving their chances of getting to know the system and potentially assisting with finding employment. The UK will remain reliant on the skills and expertise of IMGs for the foreseeable future; predicted 32 % IMG doctors in 2036 according to the General Medical Council (GMC). They will therefore represent an important part of the NHS workforce, many of whom commence work as locally employed doctors (LEDs) and contribute significantly to the success of NHS services. This article describes the information gathered from clinical observers within one department at an NHS trust in general internal medicine (GIM). We elaborate on how this experience enabled an enhanced awareness of knowing how to go about the routine daily working pattern in the NHS. The recent Royal College of Physicians (RCP) guidance on LEDs and IMGs highlights the importance of educational supervision for this group of doctors within the NHS workforce. Similarly, the GMC has reiterated the need to support the growing number of LEDs in their latest workforce planning report 2024.

Keywords: Acculturation, Acclimatisation, Attachment, Observer, Supervisor, General internal medicine

Introduction

Clinical observer roles or attachments are an opportunity for doctors who are international medical graduates (IMGs) to gain direct experience of the National Health Service (NHS) system, enhancing their knowledge of the ways of working in the UK, and thereby improving their chances of getting to know the system and potentially assisting with finding employment. Unfortunately, these placements are very hard to find these days, and the experience can be variable.1

This article describes the information gathered from clinical observers from one department at an NHS hospital in general internal medicine (GIM) and elaborates on how this experience enabled an enhanced awareness for not only IMG doctors, but also work experience secondary school students aspiring to work in the NHS and for educational supervisors (ES) to view things from a very different perspective.

The mutually beneficial shared learning obtained from directly observing the patient journey on a general medical ward, with the support and guidance from UK qualified resident doctors in training, are invaluable.

Background

The transition of embedding into the NHS healthcare system in the UK is accompanied by significant social, cultural and educational challenges. The common educational barriers faced by IMGs are usually related to lack of appreciation of the values and structure of the NHS as well as understanding the ethical and medicolegal issues. This warrants the need to address specific educational needs such as NHS structure at all levels, including the various administrative protocols, hospital policies and community services, as well as receiving feedback from colleagues about the different learning strategies in the UK.2

Clinical observer roles or attachments are a useful introduction into the ways of working to the NHS and previous studies have demonstrated that 90.4 % of responders found it to be helpful. 56.8 % would not wish to take up a substantive post without having done a voluntary placement, giving reasons of increased responsibility and, in addition, it makes it easier to apply for substantive posts.3

Overseas doctors continue to contribute significantly to the UK NHS, but arriving from a different culture and healthcare system creates specific challenges. IMGs need to understand the differences, while the organisation can help by making important information about the NHS and British culture readily accessible.4 IMGs represent an important part of the NHS workforce and contribute significantly to the success of NHS services. Despite this, they continue to face important challenges and unique obstacles compared to their British peers, particularly during their first transition year.5 It is therefore essential that doctors from a range of backgrounds are welcomed into supportive teams as per the vision and recommendations of the General Medical Council (GMC).

It is well recognised that IMGs face many difficulties when applying for their first post in the UK, as they spend long periods of time unemployed while waiting for examination results, sponsorship and registration processes before commencing their first post in the NHS.6

In the past, recommendations have been made to ensure that locally employed doctors (LEDs) appointed by NHS trusts should be developed with the same educational structure as training posts and the flexibility to suit the varying educational requirements of an IMG, with more than a third of the doctors working in the UK having qualified abroad.6,7

Discussion

We discuss the social, cultural and educational aspects as well as the awareness of various aspects of settling into a new system from a very broad context and perspective to help new IMGs and LEDs embed into the NHS.

Patient-centred decision making

Decision making, communication and the evidence base: The concept of shared decision making, when both parties adopt an approach where clinicians and patients make decisions jointly together using the best available evidence, is not necessarily always the case in some countries outside the UK.8 The most rewarding aspect was to see that shared decision making respects patient autonomy and promotes patient engagement. Effective communication between clinicians and their patients has a positive impact indeed, not only on clinical outcomes but also on their overall experience of care.9 These patient-centred experience models have been instrumental in enhancing evidence-based clinical care guidelines.10

ReSPECT (DNAR), palliative care, end of life journey and bereavement: Patients and their relatives having the right to be consulted before a Do nNot Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) documentation,11 and the involvement of terminally ill patients and the next of kin at their request, in deciding on the next course of action is readily seen. The early implementation of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT), which replaced the previous documentation of DNAR, embeds cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and gives recommendations within wider emergency treatment plans.12 In conjunction, the involvement of hospital-based specialist palliative care offers immense benefits for person-centred outcomes, including health-related quality of life, as well as symptom burden, incorporating patient depression scores and satisfaction with care, while also increasing the chances of patients dying at their preferred place of choice with little evidence of harm.13

Witnessing and recognising that a patient may be nearing the end of their life is a key consideration and early recognition of dying is vital to allow discussions to be started about the patient’s wishes.14 Observing how rapid discharge home in the patient’s last days of life is possible and can happen, with the involvement of local specialist palliative care teams who are very knowledgeable. The intricacies of how sensitive communication needs to take place between the dying person, and those friends and family identified as important and close to them with participation of members of the healthcare team were clearly noticeable. Of note, bereavement follow-up with relatives was another conspicuous practice that was evident, making collaboration easier thereafter with near and dear ones of the patient who died.15

Clinical governance and patient safety

Clinical governance is the framework for ownership and accountability in the NHS and is certainly not an optional prerequisite, but a mandatory requirement to work in the UK,16 as this may not always be defined similarly in other countries.

Medical examiner: The role of the medical examiner in finding facts about avoidable hospital deaths, working in partnership with families and carers, in identifying the cause of death was very informative.17 It is therefore crucial to understand the discussions about each death, which happens in a supportive and constructive manner. Similarly, it is imperative to know about harm reduction, root-cause analysis, incident reporting, datix and risk assessment when things happen that should not have occurred, and when things that should not have happened did unfortunately occur due to negligence, oversight or unforeseen circumstances.18, 19, 20, 21, 22

Infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship: This may be an unknown entity for some trainees who transitioned across from another continent; however, it is of paramount importance in the NHS, and one needs to embrace the underlying ethos of this agenda. The RCP has provided effective guidance on antibiotic prescribing, and the purpose of antibiotic stewardship has two primary goals – (1) to ensure effective treatment for patients with bacterial infection and (2) to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and minimise collateral damage.23, 24, 25 At a patient level, stewardship has been defined as ‘the optimal selection, dosage and duration of antimicrobial treatment that results in the best clinical outcomes’.23

Support services – BNF, TOXBASE, PACS: It is also prudent to be aware of using the aid of the British National Formulary (BNF) before prescribing medications to avoid drug and dosing errors,26 and if in doubt always check with the ward pharmacists who are more than happy to help. It is equally important to be aware of TOXBASE and the National Poisons Information Service and how to access this, especially when attending to specific clinical situations.27 Another very useful service for patients who have been to other hospitals within the UK is the option to transfer images through the PACS link system via radiology.28

DoLs, MCA, PALS and never events: These are abbreviations used commonly, but for an IMG who is new to the system, it is very tricky to understand the meaning or their importance and it takes a while to appreciate the finer details, hence it is always worth exploring with colleagues who know more and also read about them.29, 30, 31 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), ‘best interest’ Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and Patient Advice and Liaison Services (PALS) are systems in place to protect patients and one needs to know about these and enquire with the relevant personnel. What an NHS ‘never event’ means is important to assimilate.32

Interdisciplinary working and learning

Allied healthcare professionals and inter-professional learning: It is helpful to meet and be aware of allied healthcare professionals who visit the ward, with whom we must work together and foster a collaborative approach. These are healthcare staff in niche areas with expertise that help our patients during their hospital stay. In addition to physiotherapists, occupational therapists and pharmacists based on the ward, there are other staff with specific skills such as speech and language therapists, tissue viability nurses, diabetes specialist nurses, clinical nurse specialists for cancer-related illness or other benign conditions such as thrombosis, stoma care, spinal injury team, podiatrists, district nurses in the community and several other staff with whom we need to establish a rapport that will make the routine daily work seamless.33, 34, 35, 36, 37 In other healthcare systems, there may not necessarily be named personnel for such specific roles. There are also lots of opportunities to learn from the specialist skill mix of these various professionals in their respective areas of expertise while discussing mutual patients on the ward.

One must also make an effort, to understand the difference between advanced nurse practitioners (ANP) and clinical nurse specialists (CNS). ANPs are clinically based with education, leadership and research components, while CNS roles are specialist.38 It is important to recognise their defined individual domains as CNS teams are always the link for patients with their specialist teams, while ANPs have more generic roles in ensuring that routine clinical care happens effectively and efficiently. There is a lot to learn from both ANP and CNS colleagues, given their wealth of experience within their respective roles in clinical medicine.

Educational supervision for IMGs and LEDs new to the NHS

An ES can only help if the trainee appreciates what they also need to do from their perspective. Acting as an ES to a trainee is the first and foremost relationship between the ES and the allocated trainee, in which the trainee’s personal and professional development is the primary focus. A good ES is an individual who puts the trainee’s personal and professional relationship in focus and, at the same time, one who understands the importance of fairness, empathy and trust involved in that specific role. At the same time the ES is also willing to invest both time and emotional effort in the development of the trainee on a personal and professional basis. They should be able to commit to the extra challenges that may have to be faced, the skills that may have to be used and to devote in the time needed to provide support to the trainee.39 However, the LED/IMG trainee, who has not got formal NHS England annual review of competencies (ARCP) in place, has also got to mutually engage in the process with their appraisals. They need to familiarise themselves with what it entails to complete their electronic portfolios for appraisals and revalidation, in addition to getting involved in audit projects for their own learning, leadership skills and self-development.40, 41, 42

Teaching and feedback: There are enormous opportunities to teach undergraduate students who are always keen to be taught if pitched at their level of understanding.43 In addition, students from allied healthcare-related affiliated courses are usually on placement in general medical wards and it helps to learn from one another to benefit from the skill mix among all healthcare professions. Formal feedback can be obtained using validated forms, which can be used for appraisal portfolios. The offer to teach and practice objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) skills44 are always available with supervision from the resident doctors in training.

Exception reporting and guardian of safe working: While LED appointments do not usually fall under the remit of exception reporting,45 there is no reason why individual NHS trusts cannot implement these for this cohort of doctors. LEDs always have the option to contact the freedom to speak up guardian if ever needed.46 It is therefore essential for IMGs to be on board with the terminology that is commonly used in educational discussion forums.

IMGs through these observerships can recognise the importance of being able to adjust to the needs of individual patients and approaching them sensitively while taking a history, are essential communication skills. They also appreciate the empathy and compassion shown to patients, to display understanding and resilience, with the potential frustration of their current illness, situational needs, and circumstances in hospital. However, in the process everyone values the enhanced knowledge gained through these observed clinical attachments.47

Conclusion

We feel that the prospects to learn as an IMG and LED new to the NHS are significant,48,49 and there are vast opportunities for acculturation and a seamless transition as an observer to acquire clinical acumen. In addition, one can also learn about organisation, management, leadership, teaching, and training-related skills to adopt to the various aspects of working in GIM. One must embrace change and adapt to the NHS ethos to embed seamlessly, and ES roles should encompass these factors for LEDs and IMGs. In addition, the NHS remains a benchmark for postgraduate training worldwide, and working in GIM prepares one to be well on track for the well-recognised membership (MRCP) examination conducted by the Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians.50 Above all, what has been apparent to the IMGs is the impact of being polite and courteous all the time with one another and the kindness between teams as well as the compassion and empathy towards our patients. The collaborative approach of teamwork, and helping one another is very obvious in the NHS.

There is a call for more generalist physicians in the NHS with the various challenges in the system.51, 52, 53 Several of the doctors who applied and were appointed in the initial rounds of the recruitment process for standalone GIM training posts were IMGs who came via the ‘alternate route’ of certification.52,54 The current and evolving trends to enhance the experience of LEDs and IMGs is promising.55 The State of Medical Education and Practice Workforce report 2023,56 from the GMC suggests that the UK will remain reliant on the skills and expertise of IMGs for the foreseeable future (predicted 32 % IMG doctors in 2036). The need to support the growing number of LEDs has been specifically cited, highlighted and endorsed in the recent 2024 workforce report from the GMC.57 Moreover, the RCP has also produced guidance on LEDs and IMGs.58 The GMC’s Welcome to UK practice workshop highlights the need to adapt to the UK medical culture and ethics, which can be difficult for any doctor, regardless of their ethnicity and prior experience, while NHS trusts can arrange organised programmes to acculturate IMGs and deliver high-quality doctors who value patient safety.59

Disclosures

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors both from the perspective of providing placements and also thriving from opportunities for learning by observing as well, from the viewpoint as a clinical observer and we feel this will help new entrants into the NHS to get to grips with the routine working pattern.

Funding

None.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

George I Varughese: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Jovito James: Writing – original draft. Athira Mukunda: Writing – original draft. Rhea Jacob: Writing – original draft. Victoria Burnham: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Formal analysis.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: George I Varughese (GIV) and Victoria Burnham (VB) are project leads to scope the unmet need for training and mentoring of locally employed doctors and international medical graduates and involved with the recruitment of doctors. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We are also very grateful to Chloe Talbot and Craig Wallace at the Healthcare Skills Academy, Royal Stoke University Hospital for facilitating the clinical observer placements for us at the University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

Footnotes

This article reflects the opinions of the author(s) and should not be taken to represent the policy of the Royal College of Physicians unless specifically stated.

Data availability

  • No data involved - this is a generic opinion article from evidence in the literature - no data or patient information included.

References

  • 1.Ong YL, Idowu A. Structured clinical attachments for international medical graduates. Hosp Med. 2005;66(6):353–355. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2005.66.6.18404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hashim A. Educational challenges faced by international medical graduates in the UK. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:441–445. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S126859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wawdhane S, Saraf V, Davidson S, Trewby P. Clinical attachments: fond farewell or new beginning? A survey of the attitudes and practice of medical consultants and international medical graduates. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(977):196–199. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.050799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jalal M, Bardhan KD, Sanders D, Illing J. International: Overseas doctors of the NHS: migration, transition, challenges and towards resolution. Future Healthc J. 2019;6(1):76–81. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sonker P, Irimia M, Aboelnas M. Specific challenges faced by NHS overseas doctors and how to overcome them: a quality improvement project. Future Healthc J. 2023;10(Suppl 3):42. doi: 10.7861/fhj.10-3-s42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Trewby PN. Assisting international medical graduates applying for their first post in the UK: what should be done? Clin Med (Lond) 2005;5(2):126–132. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-2-126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Trewby P. Migrating doctors. Clin Med (Lond) 2017;17(1):4–5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–1367. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leonard P. Exploring ways to manage healthcare professional-patient communication issues. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(Suppl 1):7–9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3635-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L, et al. The Warwick patient experiences framework: patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(2):151–157. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Griffith R. Do not attempt resuscitation: patients and families must have a say. Br J Nurs. 2015;24(9):498–499. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.9.498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hawkes CA, Griffin J, Eli K, et al. Implementation of ReSPECT in acute hospitals: A retrospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2022;178:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bajwah S, Oluyase AO, Yi D, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9(9) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Borrill DJ, Gillon SC. Discharging patients home from hospital at the end of life. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2017;78(2):97–102. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.2.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Labram AH, Johnston B, McGuire M. An integrative literature review examining the key elements of bereavement follow-up interventions in critical care. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2023;17(3):193–207. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crinson I. Clinical governance: the new NHS, new responsibilities? Br J Nurs. 1999;8(7):449–453. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.7.6650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fletcher A, Coster J, Goodacre S. Impact of the new medical examiner role on patient safety. BMJ. 2018;363:k5166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dea S. Toward a Philosophy of Harm Reduction. Health Care Anal. 2020;28(4):302–313. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00405-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harrison A. A guide to risk assessment. Nurs Times. 2003;99(9):44–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Owusu R, Sathiavageeswaran M. Datix reporting in University Hospitals of North Midlands: what can trainees learn from this? Future Healthc J. 2023;10(Suppl 3):118–119. doi: 10.7861/fhj.10-3-s118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar S, Kline R, Boylin T. Root cause analysis in the NHS: time for change? Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2020;81(4):1–4. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wilson J. Incident reporting. Br J Nurs. 1998;7(11):670–671. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1998.7.11.5674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hand K. Antibiotic stewardship. Clin Med (Lond) 2013;13(5):499–503. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-5-499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ratnaraja NVDV, Davies AP, Atkins BL, et al. Best practice standards for the delivery of NHS infection services in the United Kingdom. Clin Infect Pract. 2021;12 doi: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2021.100095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dyar OJ, Huttner B, Schouten J, Pulcini C, ESGAP (ESCMID Study Group for Antimicrobial stewardshiP) What is antimicrobial stewardship? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(11):793–798. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Recent updates from the BNF (BNF 86) Drug Ther Bull. 2023;61(11):166–167. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2023.000050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bateman DN, Good AM, Laing WJ, Kelly CA. TOXBASE: poisons information on the internet. Emerg Med J. 2002;19(1):31–34. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sutton LN. PACS and diagnostic imaging service delivery–a UK perspective. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(2):243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shortis EJ, Newton-Clarke AJ, Verma A, Allen DE, Viola E, Metcalfe NH. Reforming DoLS: liberty protection safeguards. Postgrad Med J. 2023;99(1173):788–793. doi: 10.1136/pmj-2022-141611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marshall H, Sprung S. The Mental Capacity Act: 'Best interests'-a review of the literature. Br J Community Nurs. 2017;22(8):384–390. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.8.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shepard K, Buivydaite R, Vincent C. How do National Health Service (NHS) organisations respond to patient concerns? A qualitative interview study of the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) BMJ Open. 2021;11(11) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Omar I, Graham Y, Singhal R, Wilson M, Madhok B, Mahawar KK. Identification of Common Themes from Never Events Data Published by NHS England. World J Surg. 2021;45(3):697–704. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05867-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zuydam AC, Rogers SN, Roe JWG. Addressing patients' concerns in speech and language therapy consultations following the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;31(3):159–164. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Carlin AS. Essentials of wound care: assessing and managing impaired skin integrity. Nurs Stand. 2022;37(10):69–74. doi: 10.7748/ns.2022.e11964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kleebauer A. More district nurses are qualifying but numbers in NHS still 'eroded. Nurs Stand. 2014;28(48):13. doi: 10.7748/ns.28.48.13.s18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akiboye F, Sihre HK, Al Mulhem M, Rayman G, Nirantharakumar K, Adderley NJ. Impact of diabetes specialist nurses on inpatient care: A systematic review. Diabet Med. 2021;38(9):e14573. doi: 10.1111/dme.14573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Clatworthy N, Bird J. Celebrating the cancer clinical nurse specialist. Br J Nurs. 2023;32(5):S3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.5.S3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cooper MA, McDowell J, Raeside L, Group ANP–CNS. The similarities and differences between advanced nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists. Br J Nurs. 2019;28(20):1308–1314. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.20.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Barrie J, Walwyn S. Being a good educational supervisor. BJA Educ. 2021;21(3):102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stewart K, Bray B, Buckingham R. Improving quality of care through national clinical audit. Future Hosp J. 2016;3(3):203–206. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Launer J. In defence of appraisal. Postgrad Med J. 2019;95(1122):235–236. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-136500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ahmed MH. Reflection for the undergraduate on writing in the portfolio: where are we now and where are we going? J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018;6(3):97–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Varadhan L, Rowley C, Varughese GI. Medical student evaluation of clinical teaching sessions in diabetes and endocrinology: a quantitative analysis based on formatted feedback over 1 year. Diabet Med. 2010;27(11):1329–1331. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yeates P, Maluf A, Kinston R, et al. A realist evaluation of how, why and when objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs) are experienced as an authentic assessment of clinical preparedness. Med Teach. 2024;18:1–9. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2339413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Roycroft M. Exception reporting in 2018: how often is it happening? Future Healthc J. 2020;7(3):230–233. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jones A, Maben J, Adams M, et al. National Institute for Health and Care Research; Southampton (UK): 2022. Implementation of ‘Freedom to Speak Up Guardians’ in NHS Acute and Mental Health Trusts in England: the FTSUG Mixed-Methods Study. Accessed December 3, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rowland E, Trueman H. Improving healthcare student experience of clinical placements. BMJ Open Qual. 2024;13(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Varughese GI, Burnham V. Fellowships and international medical graduates: the need for a reappraisal. BMJ. 2023;383:2765. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Castelhano R, Kakkar V, McKinlay C, et al. Recruitment of medical graduates from Prague to foundation programme jobs in a UK hospital: results of a 6-year project. Future Healthc J. 2023;10(2):124–128. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Varughese GI. General internal medicine: acquiring clinical acumen from bedside to front door with opportunities for undergraduate and postgraduate training. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2024;85(4):1–4. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bright P, Silverton R. The FHJ debate generalist skills: For the many or the few? Future Healthc J. 2024;11(2) doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Riley J, Varughese GI. Generalism and specialism within medicine: a viewpoint from internal medicine training and perspective on the challenges of enthusing undergraduate UK medical students. Future Healthc J. 2024;11(4) doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Estabrook E, Dhaliwal G, Bright P. Why the NHS needs adult generalists: A call for single certification in general internal medicine. Future Healthc J. 2024;11(4) doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Estabrook E, Langford C, Curtis S. Programme evaluation of the general internal medicine training programme. Future Healthc J. 2024;11(2) doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Burnham V, Varughese GI. Locally employed doctors and international medical graduates in the NHS: current and evolving trends. Br J Hosp Med. 2025 doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.GMC: 2023 https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/workforce-report-2023-full-report_pdf-103569478.pdf (Accessed December 3, 2024)
  • 57.GMC: 2024 https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/somep-workforce-report-2024-full-report_pdf-109169408.pdf (Accessed December 3, 2024)
  • 58.RCP: 2024 https://www.rcp.ac.uk/media/tfkj52qc/educational-and-career-support-for-locally-employed-leds-and-imgs.pdf (Accessed December 3, 2024)
  • 59.Thacker J, Gadde R, Sathiakeerthy R, Unnithan A. Acculturation of international medical graduates into the NHS. Future Healthc J. 2022;9(1):11–12. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

  • No data involved - this is a generic opinion article from evidence in the literature - no data or patient information included.


Articles from Future Healthcare Journal are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES