Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2025 Feb 7;12:RP87092. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87092

Il-6 signaling exacerbates hallmarks of chronic tendon disease by stimulating reparative fibroblasts

Tino Stauber 1, Greta Moschini 1,2, Amro A Hussien 1, Patrick Klaus Jaeger 1, Katrien De Bock 2, Jess G Snedeker 1,
Editors: Valerie Horsley3, Hiroshi Takayanagi4
PMCID: PMC11805502  PMID: 39918402

Abstract

Tendinopathies are debilitating diseases currently increasing in prevalence and associated costs. There is a need to deepen our understanding of the underlying cell signaling pathways to unlock effective treatments. In this work, we screen cell signaling pathways in human tendinopathies and find positively enriched IL-6/JAK/STAT signaling alongside signatures of cell populations typically activated by IL-6 in other tissues. In human tendinopathic tendons, we also confirm the strong presence and co-localization of IL-6, IL-6R, and CD90, an established marker of reparative fibroblasts. To dissect the underlying causalities, we combine IL-6 knock-out mice with an explant-based assembloid model of tendon damage to successfully connect IL-6 signaling to reparative fibroblast activation and recruitment. Vice versa, we show that these reparative fibroblasts promote the development of tendinopathy hallmarks in the damaged explant upon IL-6 activation. We conclude that IL-6 activates tendon fibroblast populations which then initiate and deteriorate tendinopathy hallmarks.

Research organism: Human, Mouse

Introduction

Tendons are essential to every human movement (Kirkendall and Garrett, 1997). Tendinopathies represent the largest group of common tendon diseases and approximately 22% of all sport-related injuries (Florit et al., 2019). They can strike tendons at many different anatomical locations, can dramatically diminish quality of life by limiting the associated movements, and often share a history of repetitive overuse-induced damage and repair cycles (Florit et al., 2019; McElvany et al., 2015; Snedeker et al., 2017; Yelin et al., 2016). Once adult tendon regions fail to keep up with functional demands, they fall into a state of non-resolving, uncontrolled lesion repair (Lipman et al., 2018; Riley, 2008; Soslowsky et al., 2000; Järvinen et al., 2005; Magnusson et al., 2010; Willett et al., 2007; Howell et al., 2017).

These chronic tendon lesions underlying tendinopathies feature characteristics of normal wound healing including accelerated extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover and proliferation of reparative fibroblast populations as well as their migration to replace and repopulate damaged tissues (Howell et al., 2017; Li et al., 2007; Millar et al., 2021; Gelberman et al., 1986; Sharma and Maffulli, 2006; Harvey et al., 2019). In tendon, reparative (e.g. Scx+) fibroblast populations are assumed to reside primarily in the extrinsic compartment comprising epitenon and paratenon from where they are recruited to the damaged intrinsic compartment embodied by the load-bearing tendon core (Gelberman et al., 1986; Dyment et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2021; Mendias et al., 2012; Mienaltowski et al., 2013). While the mechanisms governing activation, proliferation, and recruitment of these populations are unclear, some insight can be gleaned from studies on other musculoskeletal tissues (Snedeker et al., 2017; Gelberman et al., 1991).

In acute muscle lesions, mechanisms for repair, hypertrophy, and hyperplasia are dominated by the satellite cells residing in the muscle basal lamina (Serrano et al., 2008; Yin et al., 2013; Cosgrove et al., 2009; Ceafalan et al., 2014). Satellite cells in muscle and dermal fibroblasts in skin are activated and recruited by interleukin-6 (IL-6), a key player in the acute phase response to stress (Serrano et al., 2008; Ceafalan et al., 2014; Muñoz-Cánoves et al., 2013). Stress-related mechanisms activating IL-6 mRNA transcription in the absence of exogenous pathogens include damage-associated molecular patterns, calcium signaling after membrane depolarization, but also energetic stressors like glycogen depletion and redox signaling following exercise (Tanaka et al., 2014; Kistner et al., 2022). In humans, IL-6 transmits its signal via classical or trans-signaling (Su et al., 2017). Classical signaling involves the membrane-bound receptor IL-6R, which forms a homodimer with gp130 upon IL-6 binding. Trans-signaling works similarly, except that the IL-6R has been solubilized (sIL-6R) by metalloproteases (mostly ADAM10 and 17) (Villar-Fincheira et al., 2021), which cleave it from the cell membrane (Su et al., 2017; Villar-Fincheira et al., 2021). Since not all cell populations express IL-6R, trans-signaling via sIL-6R enables IL-6 signaling for a wider range of cell populations. Regardless of classical or trans-signaling initiation, further transduction of the IL-6 signal runs via two major pathways (JAK/STAT/ERK [Zhang et al., 2013; Watanabe et al., 2004] and SHP2/GAB2/MAPK [Ernst and Jenkins, 2004; Eulenfeld et al., 2012]) to turn on cellular processes inducing proliferation, migration, metabolic adaptations, and tissue turnover (Su et al., 2017; Choy and Rose-John, 2017). In chronic muscle lesions like Duchenne muscular dystrophy, IL-6 is persistently upregulated, and anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies have been proposed as treatment options (Wada et al., 2017). Anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies (IL-6 inhibitors) like tocilizumab inhibit both classical and trans-signaling and are routinely used in other chronic inflammatory diseases like systemic sclerosis, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis (Tanaka et al., 2014; Choy et al., 2020; Srirangan and Choy, 2010; Lewinson et al., 2018; Simone et al., 2003). In this context, IL-6 inhibitors have been shown to reduce disease hallmarks including arthritis-concomitant tendon inflammation (Poutoglidou et al., 2021; Choy et al., 2002; Emery et al., 2008). Analogous to these chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases, tendinopathies present with localized pain, swelling, and functional decline in the affected organ (Snedeker et al., 2017; Riley, 2008; Colquhoun et al., 2022; Aström and Rausing, 1995). Histological and molecular characteristics of tendinopathy include hypercellularity, disorganized collagen fibers including mechanically inferior collagen-3, and dysregulated ECM homeostasis (Millar et al., 2021; Andersson et al., 2011; Jones et al., 2006; Riley et al., 1994). Based on this research performed in other tissues, repair-competent fibroblasts appear as prime targets and effectors for IL-6 signaling in a tendon wound healing context (Muñoz-Cánoves et al., 2013; Moresi et al., 2019; Nowell et al., 2003; McFarland-Mancini et al., 2010).

Here, we investigated the hypothesis that IL-6 plays a vital role in activating reparative fibroblasts within the extrinsic tissue compartment (i.e. epitenon or paratenon) and recruitment of these cells to the damaged tendon core tissue in non-sheathed tendons (Howell et al., 2017; Stauber et al., 2021; Sakabe et al., 2018). While this likely represents a critical step in normal tendon healing (Lin et al., 2006; Nakama et al., 2006; Stauber et al., 2020), we propose that extended and excessive IL-6 signaling may causally exacerbate tendinopathy in non-sheathed tendons (Legerlotz et al., 2012).

We experimentally tested and confirmed these hypotheses in four steps:

  1. We showed that the IL-6/JAK/STAT signaling cascade is positively enriched in (non-sheathed) human tendinopathic tendons alongside gene signatures typical for fibroblasts as well as downstream gene sets suggesting excessive cell proliferation (hypercellularity), imbalanced ECM turnover, and neo-vascularization.

  2. We verified increased IL-6 and IL-6R levels in tendinopathic human tissue samples with fluorescence microscopy. We also co-stained these sections with a marker for reparative fibroblasts (CD90+) to confirm their increased presence and gauge their contribution to the elevated IL-6 and IL-6R levels in tendinopathic human tissues.

  3. We exploited an explant-based assembloid model system to confirm the causal effect of IL-6 signaling on extrinsic fibroblast activation, recruitment, and proliferation in tendinopathic niche conditions.

  4. We followed the downstream effects of enhanced extrinsic fibroblast activation and accumulation on the tendon core embedded in our assembloids. Here, we document the emergence of central tendinopathic hallmarks including aberrant (catabolic) matrix turnover, hypercellularity, and hypoxic responses with a stronger fibroblast presence, which is reduced when IL-6 core signaling is inhibited.

Results

The IL-6/JAK/STAT signaling signature is positively enriched in human tendinopathic tendons alongside signatures of extrinsic cell population activation and hallmarks of clinical tendinopathy

To better illuminate the ongoing wound healing processes that are a central feature of chronic tendon disease, we first searched for enriched signaling pathways underlying tendinopathic tendons in a publicly available dataset (GEO: GSE26051) (Jelinsky et al., 2011). To deduce common disease patterns affecting tendons from diverse anatomical locations, the microarray dataset contained analyzed samples from 23 normal and 23 tendinopathic human tendons of mixed anatomical origin. We excluded 5 normal and 5 tendinopathic samples from sheathed tendons originally included in the dataset, as those tendons are organized into different sub-compartments than the non-sheathed tendons remaining in the dataset (Figure 1—figure supplement 1, Supplementary file 1). Overall, we found 240 significantly upregulated genes, 474 significantly downregulated genes, and 20,359 not-differentially regulated genes in tendinopathic compared to normal control tendons.

Further analysis revealed significantly upregulated IL6 and IL6 signaling transducer (IL6ST, also known as GP130) transcripts in tendinopathic tendon tissue (Figure 1A and B, Table 1). Conversely, IL6 receptor (IL6RA) expression trended toward downregulation. Focusing on proteases that generate soluble IL6RA, we found significant upregulation of both ADAM10 and ADAM17 in human tendinopathic tendons. Downstream of IL6 receptor binding, JAK1 trended toward upregulation and STAT3 was upregulated significantly. Other IL6 regulated signaling checkpoints such as MAPK3 and GAB2 trended toward downregulation. Aside from IL6, another significantly upregulated member of the IL-6 family was interleukin-11 (IL11).

Figure 1. Transcriptome analysis of up- and downregulated genes and pathways in tendinopathic compared to normal control human tendons (non-sheathed).

(A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) comparing tendinopathic to normal human tendons. Genes colored in red have a log2 (fold change)>1, a p-value<0.05, and are therefore considered to be significantly increased in tendinopathic tendons. Genes colored in blue have a log2 (fold change)<–1, a p-value<0.05, and are therefore considered to be significantly decreased in tendinopathic tendons. The log2 and p-value thresholds are represented by the dashed lines. Annotated genes are part of the IL-6 cytokine superfamily, the IL-6 signaling cascade, or involved in matrix turnover. (B) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of expression values from members of the IL-6 cytokine superfamily, their receptors, and parts of the IL-6 signaling cascade (biological replicates: N=18 normal, N=18 tendinopathic). Genes are clustered by color with positive (red) or negative (blue) row-scaled z-scores. (C) Dotplot showing significantly enriched gene sets (p-value<0.05) as determined by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) based on the MSigDB human hallmark gene sets. The color of the circles represents their p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the position on the x-axis the enrichment score as well as its direction. (D) GSEA plot for the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling hallmark contained in the MSigDB human hallmark gene sets. The green line traces the running enrichment score on the y-axis while going down the rank of genes listed on the x-axis, the black lines standing in blue and red bars indicate the locations of the genes related to the pathway in the ranked list, and the gray histogram shows the running list score across the ranks. (E) Dotplot showing the top 10 gene ontology (GO) gene sets for biological processes most significantly enriched by overlapping DEG sets. The color of the circles represents their adjusted p-value (false discovery rate [FDR]), the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the position on the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio). (F) Dotplot showing significantly enriched fibroblast signature gene sets (p-value<0.05) as determined by GSEA based on the MSigDB human cell-type signature gene sets. The color of the circles represents their p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the position on the x-axis the enrichment score as well as its direction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) plots of the human tendon microarray data.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Principal components 1 and 2 for the full dataset with tendinopathic (red) and normal (blue) tendons. Tendons surrounded by a sheath in vivo are delineated by a dashed border. (B) Principal components 1 and 2 for the same dataset after excluding sheathed tendons as delineated in A.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Detailed transcriptome analysis of up- and downregulated genes and pathways in normal and human tendinopathic tendons (non-sheathed).

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Dotplot showing the top 20 GO gene sets for biological processes significantly enriched by transcripts increased in human tendinopathic tendons. (B) Dotplot showing all the GO gene sets for biological processes enriched by transcripts decreased in human tendinopathic tendons. In all the dotplots, the color of the circles represents their adjusted p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the position on the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Detailed transcriptome analysis of up- and downregulated genes and pathways in normal and human tendinopathic tendons (non-sheathed).

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Dotplot showing all the GO gene sets for molecular functions enriched by transcripts increased in human tendinopathic tendons. (B) Dotplot showing all the GO gene sets for molecular functions enriched by transcripts decreased in human tendinopathic tendons. In all the dotplots, the color of the circles represents their adjusted p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the position on the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).

Table 1. Effect sizes and p-values for selected transcripts.

The data describes the differences between tendinopathic and normal control human tendons (non-sheathed).

Transcript Effect size p-Value
IL6 1.529 0.021
IL6RA –0.423 0.116
IL6ST / GP130 0.399 0.035
ADAM10 0.606 0.023
ADAM17 0.541 0.014
JAK1 0.344 0.078
STAT1 0.224 0.305
STAT3 0.36 0.036
MAPK1 0.3 0.086
MAPK3 –0.386 0.085
GAB2 –0.517 0.057
IL11 0.913 0.048
IL11RA –0.053 0.844
COL1A1 0.523 0.04
COL1A2 0.624 0.013
COL3A1 0.408 0.106
COL18A1 1.112 0.009
MMP9 1.556 0.083
MMP13 0.981 0.151
MMP3 –2.779 0.005

In line with aberrant matrix turnover generally featured in tendinopathy, the transcripts of the following genes were significantly increased in the tendinopathic samples: COL1A1, COL1A2, COL18A1.

Since changes in single transcripts alone have a limited predictive value for pathway-level changes, we next performed unbiased gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using the human hallmark dataset from MSigDB (Subramanian et al., 2005; Liberzon et al., 2015). Confirming the trends from the single transcript analysis, GSEA revealed a positive enrichment of the IL-6/JAK/STAT pathway (q-value: 0.003) alongside gene sets matching well-known tendinopathy hallmarks such as neo-vascularization (i.e. angiogenesis, mTORC1 signaling) and hypercellularity (i.e. G2M checkpoint, mitotic spindle, MYC targets v1, epithelial mesenchymal transition, and E2F targets) in the tendinopathic samples compared to the normal controls (Figure 1C and D). We then looked further into aberrant biological processes by mapping the significantly changed single transcripts (p-value<0.01) to the respective gene ontology (GO) database in an overrepresentation analysis (ORA) (Figure 1E, Figure 1—figure supplement 2, Figure 1—figure supplement 3). The emerging processes pointed toward ongoing morphogenesis and wound healing favoring hypercellularity (i.e. proliferation, migration) and ECM turnover, which are both established hallmarks of tendinopathy. Lastly, we matched the detected transcript changes to the human cell-type signature gene sets from MSigDB in a GSEA to estimate the contribution of fibroblasts to the aberrant processes (Subramanian et al., 2005; Liberzon et al., 2015). While this database does not yet include tendon-specific fibroblast populations, the signature gene sets of several fibroblast populations were significantly enriched by the transcript changes detected in tendinopathic tendons (Figure 1F). To confirm the increase of transcripts related to IL-6 signaling and fibroblast presence on the protein level, we next assessed human patient samples using fluorescence microscopy.

IL-6, IL-6R, and CD90 are elevated on the protein level in tendinopathic human tendons compared to normal control tendons

In a second step, we sought to validate the gene array analysis highlighting elevated IL-6-IL-6R signaling as well as the elevated presence of fibroblasts in non-sheathed tendinopathic tendons compared to non-sheathed normal control tendons on the protein level. We thus extracted tissue sections from tendinopathic biceps tendons and from normal control tendons leftover after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery (Figure 2A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1) and stained them with fluorescently labeled IL-6, IL-6R, and CD90 antibodies.

Figure 2. Distribution of IL-6, CD90, and IL-6R in normal control and tendinopathic human tendons (non-sheathed).

(A) Illustrative depiction of the origins of the tendons used in this experiment. Normal control tendon tissues were taken from semitendinosus and gracilis tendons leftover from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Tendinopathic tissues were taken from painful shoulders during surgery (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of normal control (left) and tendinopathic tendons (right) stained with DAPI (blue) and an IL-6 antibody (red). Boxplots depict the quantified co-localization of DAPI and IL-6 (IL-6+ cells) calculated as percentage of the total number of cells. Biological replicates: N=8. (C) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of normal control (left) and tendinopathic tendons (right) stained with DAPI (blue) and a CD90 antibody (green). Boxplots depict the quantified co-localization of DAPI and CD90 (CD90+ cells) calculated as percentage of the total number of cells. Biological replicates: N=7. (D) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of normal control (left) and tendinopathic tendons (right) stained with DAPI (blue) and an IL-6R antibody (magenta). Boxplots depict the quantified co-localization of DAPI and IL-6R (IL-6R+ cells) calculated as percentage of the total number of cells. Biological replicates: N=7. In all boxplots, each datapoint was calculated from eight representative fluorescence microscopy images taken from the same sample. The colored datapoint matches the presented fluorescence microscopy image. The upper and lower hinges correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extend from the hinges no further than 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the points beyond the whiskers are treated as outliers. Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: n.s.p ≥ = 0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01. The applied statistical test was the Student’s t-test.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Metadata of the human patient-derived tissues analyzed with fluorescence microscopy.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Tendinopathic tissues were gathered from a total of 10 patients with painful biceps tendons. The photographic images depict the tendons from which the sections were collected. Normal control tissues were gathered from the leftover semitendinosus or gracilis tendons of a total of eight patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. No images were taken from the normal control tendons.

In normal control tendons, the fluorescent signal stemming from the IL-6 antibody (Figure 2B, left side, red) appeared to be confined to the extrinsic compartment, which we identified based on the clustering of cells with a roundish nucleus (blue). In tendinopathic tendons (Figure 2B, right side), it was challenging to identify the extrinsic compartment due to the characteristic change in cell shape from elongated to more roundish in both the extrinsic compartment and the load-bearing core tissue. While the signal of the IL-6 antibody was more evenly distributed over the tendinopathic tissue section and tendon compartments compared to the control, it was still more prominent around roundish than elongated cells. Using the nuclear staining as a mask, we attributed IL-6 secretion to cells based on spatial proximity. The percentage of IL-6 secreting cells was only slightly increased in tendinopathic compared to healthy control tendons (Table 2).

Table 2. Percentages of IL-6+, CD90+, and IL-6R+ cells of all cells in tendinopathic and normal control tissues derived from human patients.

The values are given as median(IQR).

Condition IL-6+ % all cells CD90+ % all cells IL-6R+ % all cells
Tendinopathic 33.3 (38.4) 45.6 (36.3) 37.5 (41.2)
Normal control 22.5 (17.2) 4.3 (9.0) 5.3 (10.2)

The cell surface protein CD90 is a common marker of reparative fibroblasts (Ho et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021). Here, we visually detected its signal on only a few cells in the normal control tendons (Figure 2C, left side, green) but on a large number of cells in the tendinopathic tendons (Figure 2C, right side). The subsequent spatial proximity-based quantification confirmed this initial visual impression by detecting a statistically significant difference in the percentage CD90+ in the normal control compared to the tendinopathic tendon (Table 2).

The IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) is another central part of the IL-6 signaling cascade. While some cells in the normal control tendons stained positively for IL-6R, many more seemed to be present in the tendinopathic tendons. We could confirm this again with spatial proximity-based quantification detecting a statistically significant difference in the percentage of IL-6R+ cells in normal control compared to tendinopathic tendons (Table 2).

Both IL-6 and IL-6R appear in spatial proximity to CD90+ and CD68+ cells in non-sheathed human tendinopathic tendons

In another study conducted in mouse tendons, immune cells such as macrophages were reported as major sources of IL-6R during tendon growth (Bautista et al., 2023). We therefore co-stained cells with IL-6, IL-6R, and the established human macrophage surface marker CD68 to see whether this was also true in the context of human tendinopathic tendons. To further check whether (reparative) fibroblasts could indeed be involved in IL-6-IL-6R signaling as initially hypothesized, we also co-stained human tendinopathic tendons with CD90, IL-6, and IL-6R. We again used tendinopathic tissues extracted from diseased biceps tendons (Figure 3A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Figure 3. Co-localization of IL-6, IL-6R, CD90, and CD68 in tendinopathic human tendons (non-sheathed).

Figure 3.

(A) Illustrative depiction of the origin of the tendon used in this experiment (painful biceps tendons, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of tendinopathic tendons stained with DAPI (blue), an IL-6 antibody (red), and either a CD90 antibody (left image, green) or a CD68 antibody (right image, green). Boxplots depict the quantified co-localization of DAPI, IL-6, and either CD90 (biological replicates: N=7) or CD68 (biological replicates: N=8) calculated as percentage of the number of DAPI+IL-6+ cells. (C) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of tendinopathic tendons stained with DAPI (blue), an IL-6R antibody (magenta), and either a CD90 antibody (left image, green) or a CD68 antibody (right image, green). Boxplots depict the quantified co-localization of DAPI, IL-6, and either CD90 or CD68 calculated as percentage of the number of DAPI+IL-6R+ cells (biological replicates: N=7). In all boxplots, each datapoint was calculated from eight representative fluorescence microscopy images taken from the same sample. The colored datapoint matches the presented fluorescence microscopy image. The upper and lower hinges correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extend from the hinges no further than 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the points beyond the whiskers are treated as outliers. Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01. The applied statistical test was the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.

We found a high percentage of cells in close spatial proximity to fluorescent signals generated by the IL-6 antibodies (Figure 3B, left side, red) to be CD90+ (green and blue), identifying them as a likely source of IL-6. Again, IL-6 secreting, CD90+ cells assumed a more roundish phenotype in contrast to the CD90+ cells not secreting IL-6. The overlap between signals from CD68+ cells (Figure 3B, right side, green and blue) and the IL-6 antibodies (red) seemed less pronounced. Indeed, quantification of the spatial signal overlay showed a significantly higher percentage of cells in spatial proximity to IL-6 to be CD90+ rather than CD68+ cells (Table 3).

Table 3. CD90+ and CD68+ cells as percentages of IL-6+ and IL-6R+ cells in tendinopathic tissues derived from human patients.

The values are given as median(IQR).

CD90+ (median(IQR)) CD68+ (median(IQR))
% of IL-6+ 50.2 (27.6) 5.02 (21.1)
% of IL-6R+ 95.0 (25.1) 37.0 (20.6)

The presence of IL-6R on different cell populations could provide cues on the targets of IL-6 signaling in tendinopathic tendons. In the tendinopathic sections probed here, almost all cells that stained positively for IL-6R (Figure 3C, left side, magenta) were also CD90+ (green and blue) but less than half of them were CD68+ cells (Figure 3C, right side, green and blue). Quantifying the difference based on spatial proximity confirmed this impression (Table 3) and the statistical analysis judged it to be statistically significant. The staining antibody and quantification method deployed here likely cannot discriminate between IL-6R produced by the cell carrying it and IL-6R that was solubilized participates in trans-signaling.

We conclude from the above analysis that IL-6 signaling in non-sheathed tendinopathic tendons plausibly contributes to chronic tendinopathic hallmarks like hypercellularity and aberrant matrix turnover, potentially by activating reparative (CD90+) fibroblast populations through IL-6R. On this basis, we sought to directly test whether a causal relationship exists between the observed changes in IL-6 signaling and the associated disease processes. To this end, we harnessed an in vitro assembloid model of inter-compartmental crosstalk to better dissect the role of IL-6 in tendinopathy.

IL-6 signaling by tendon core explants activates extrinsic fibroblasts

We have previously validated a hybrid explant // hydrogel assembloid model that reproduces the in vivo tissue compartment interface between the load-bearing tendon core and the extrinsic compartment (i.e. epitenon and paratenon) of non-sheathed tendons (Stauber et al., 2021; Stauber et al., 2024). We exploited this model to test whether IL-6 signaling across tissue compartments could activate fibroblast populations in the peritendinous space in a manner that mimics the IL-6 signaling signatures we uncovered in the human data analysis (Figure 4A). Briefly, we isolated and clamped mouse tail tendon fascicles to represent the tendon core while selecting (mainly Scx+ and CD146+) fibroblasts from digested Achilles tendons based on plastic adherence growth and surface marker expression as established previously and repeated here (Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Figure 4—figure supplement 2; Stauber et al., 2021; Tarafder et al., 2017). To form the artificial extrinsic compartment, we encapsulated these fibroblast populations into a collagen hydrogel which we then let polymerize around the clamped core explants (Figure 4C).

Figure 4. Concept behind the in vitro hybrid explant // hydrogel assembloid system.

(A) Abstract representation of the in vivo load-bearing tendon core subunits (light blue/white) surrounded by the extrinsic compartment (white) containing, i.e., extrinsic fibroblasts (light brown). (B) Sources of the in vitro model system components with the IL-6 knock-out core (KO core) in violet, the IL-6 wildtype core (WT core) in light blue, the IL-6 wildtype fibroblasts in light brown, and the ScxGFP fibroblasts in green. Core explants were clamped, and the fibroblasts embedded in a (liquid) collagen solution before crosslinking the mixture into a hydrogel around the clamped core explants in various combinations. (C) Photographic and light microscopic images of the in vitro assembloid model system. Lid of a 15 ml Falcon tube (Ø: 17 mm) used for scale.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Characterization of cell populations derived from Achilles tendons and tail tendon fascicles of ScxGFP mice (morphology and surface markers).

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative light microscopy images depicting tail tendon fascicle-derived fibroblasts and Achilles tendon-derived fibroblasts cultured on standard tissue culture plastic before being passaged for the first time (P1) or the second time (P2). The Achilles tendon-derived fibroblasts were embedded in the collagen hydrogels at P2. (B) Presence of a selection of cell surface markers on cell populations isolated from tail tendon fascicles or Achilles tendons immediately after the digestion (left) and after passaging them twice (P2, right). Using flow cytometry, the following markers were analyzed after excluding doublets and dead cells: Scx, CD45, CD34, CD31, and CD136.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Characterization of cell populations derived from Achilles tendons and tail tendon fascicles of ScxGFP mice (gene transcripts).

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Presence of a selection of gene transcripts in cell populations isolated from tail tendon fascicles or Achilles tendons after passaging them twice. Using RT-qPCR, the following gene transcripts were measured: Spp1, Scx, Mkx, Col1a1, Dpt, Tnmd, Ctgf, Acta2, and Pdgfra. The dots indicate the relative expression values (dCt) of the transcripts normalized to that of Eif4a2, an established housekeeping gene, for a different animal each (biological replicates: N=3). The depicted gene transcripts and their typical expression levels in different cell populations were previously reported in mouse Achilles tendons analyzed with single-cell RNA-seq (De Micheli et al., 2020).
Figure 4—figure supplement 3. Identification of cellular IL-6 and IL-6R sources in mouse tendon assembloids using flow cytometry and analyzing the supernatant.

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

(A) Detection of IL-6 protein level differences in the supernatants obtained from IL-6 wildtype core explant surrounded by a collagen hydrogel (WT core // cell-free, light blue), IL-6 knock-out core explants surrounded by a collagen hydrogel (KO core // cell-free, violet), and extrinsic, IL-6 wildtype fibroblasts seeded into a collagen hydrogel (fibroblasts [in hydrogel], light brown) after 7 days in culture (biological replicates: N=6). The upper and lower bounding boxes correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile) and the middle bar to the median. Whiskers extend from the upper/lower hinge to the largest/smallest value no further than 1.5 the interquartile range. Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: **p<0.01, n.s.p>=0.05. The applied statistical test was the Wilcoxon rank sum. (B) On the left side: Flow cytometric analysis of digested wildtype core explants (WT core // cell-free) surrounded by a collagen hydrogel after 7 days in culture. The different colors indicate different biological replicates (N=3). On the right side: Flow cytometric analysis of extrinsic fibroblast cultured on tissue culture plastic before being passaged for the second time (P2, biological replicates: N=1). Assessed markers include the hematopoietic lineage marker CD45 and the IL-6R.

In a separate experiment, we verified the presence and located the cellular sources of IL-6 and IL-6R using supernatant and flow cytometric analysis respectively (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Both were present in the supernatant (IL-6) and on CD45+ cell populations (IL-6R) from core explants, but not in the supernatant or on the surface of extrinsic fibroblasts cultured in a collagen hydrogel. This indicates that the following described effects of IL-6 on extrinsic fibroblasts could be dominated by trans-signaling.

To dissect the effect of IL-6 signaling on the extrinsic target populations, we integrated either wildtype-derived (WT) or IL-6 knock-out-derived (KO) explants from the B6.129S2-Il6tm1Kopf/J (Kopf et al., 1994) mouse line (Figure 5A). We then performed bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) on the extrinsic populations after 1 week of co-culture in tendinopathic niche conditions (Stauber et al., 2021; Blache et al., 2021; Wunderli et al., 2020).

Figure 5. Transcript changes in hydrogel-embedded fibroblasts seeded around an IL-6 knock-out (KO) core explant compared to those seeded around a wildtype (WT) core.

(A) Illustration of the assembloid combinations compared here (KO core // fibroblasts vs. WT core // fibroblasts), the assessed timepoint (d7), and the analyzed compartment (extrinsic fibroblasts only). (B) RNA-seq volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Genes colored in red have a log2 (fold change)>0.5, a p-value<0.05, and are considered to be significantly increased in the extrinsic compartment of KO core // fibroblast assembloids. Genes colored in blue have a log2 (fold change)<–0.5, a p-value<0.05, and are considered to be significantly increased in the extrinsic compartment of WT core // fibroblast assembloids. The log2 and p-value thresholds are represented by the dashed lines. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top 50 DEGs. Genes are clustered by color with positive (red) or negative (blue) row-scaled z-scores. Columns represent individual samples (biological replicates: N=6). (D) Dotplots depicting a selection of gene ontology (GO) annotations significantly enriched (adjusted p-value<0.05) by the DEGs. The selection was biased by GO biological process annotations enriched in the human dataset (Figure 1E). The color of the circles represents their adjusted p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Detailed transcriptome analysis of genes up- and downregulated in hydrogel-embedded fibroblast seeded around an IL-6 knock-out (KO) core explant compared to those seeded around a wildtype (WT) core.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) Illustration of the assembloid combinations compared here (KO core // fibroblasts vs. WT core // fibroblasts), the assessed timepoint (d7), and the analyzed compartment (extrinsic fibroblasts only). (B) Dotplot showing significantly enriched gene sets (p-value<0.05) as determined by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) based on the MSigDB mouse hallmark gene sets. The +/- signs indicate the direction of the enrichment in the extrinsic fibroblasts around a KO core compared to those around a WT core. (C) Dotplot showing the top 20 gene ontology (GO) gene sets for biological processes significantly enriched by transcripts increased in fibroblasts seeded around a KO core. (D) Dotplot showing the top 20 GO gene sets for biological processes significantly enriched by transcripts decreased in fibroblasts seeded around a KO core. In all the dotplots, the color of the circles represents their p-value, their size the number of enriched genes (count), and their position on the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).

Overall, integration of an IL-6 KO core increased transcripts of 256 genes in the surrounding extrinsic compartment, decreased transcripts of 98 genes, and left 15,295 unchanged (Figure 5B and C). After mapping the significant transcript changes to biological processes in the GO database, we conducted a biased search for processes matching those dysregulated in human tendinopathic tendons. Out of the 195 significantly enriched biological processes (adjusted p-value<0.05) in the extrinsic compartment of KO core // fibroblast assembloids, 10 (5.1%) could be linked to changes in local cellularity and another 10 to ECM turnover (Figure 5D).

When stratifying the respective contribution of transcripts increased and decreased around a KO core compared to a WT core to the top 20 enriched GO biological processes and significantly enriched MSigDB mouse hallmarks, we found that IL-6 signaling by the core correlated positively with processes aimed at increasing cellularity and ECM turnover (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B–D), which are both hallmarks of tendinopathic tissues and indicators of an activated tissue state.

To verify the transcript-level differences connected to hypercellularity also on the tissue level, we next performed a proliferation and migration analysis in our assembloid model system.

IL-6 signaling by tendon core explants stimulates cell proliferation and Scx+ cell recruitment to the signaling tendon core

Using the assembloid model, we investigated whether IL-6 signaling could play a causative role in the hypercellularity that is a major hallmark of tendinopathy. Closely mimicking human tendinopathic tendons, we indeed found cellularity-increasing biological processes to be positively enriched in cell populations around WT compared to those around IL-6 KO tendon core explants. We then assessed whether these IL-6-dependent transcript-level changes would translate to an increased cell density. To do this, we seeded tendon fibroblast populations isolated from ScxGFP mice (co-expressing the tendon marker scleraxis [Scx] with a green fluorescent protein) into the hydrogel extrinsic compartment of our assembloids and incorporated either a WT or an IL-6 KO core into the center (Figure 6A, top panels).

Figure 6. Cell proliferation around and ScxGFP fibroblast recruitment to core explants.

Figure 6.

(A) Illustrative depictions and representative fluorescence microscopy images of wildtype (WT) core explants surrounded by fibroblast populations from ScxGFP mice cultured with or without tocilizumab (10 µg/ml), and IL-6 knock-out (KO) explants cultured with or without recombinant IL-6 (25 ng/ml) for 7 days. All cells are colored in blue (NucBlue), ScxGFP fibroblasts in green (GFP), and dead cells in red (EthD). (B, C, D) Boxplots depicting the total number of cells, the number of ScxGFP cells, and the ratio between core-resident and extrinsic ScxGFP cells normalized to the WT median. Each datapoint was calculated from three representative fluorescence microscopy images taken from the same sample. The red datapoint matches the presented fluorescence microscopy image. The upper and lower hinges correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extend from the hinges no further than 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the points beyond the whiskers are treated as outliers. (E) Lineplot depicting the cumulative percentage of ScxGFP cells depending on their distance from the center line of the core explant. The points and the line represent the mean cumulative percentages and the error bands the standard error of the mean (sem). The dashed line indicates locations inside the core area (biological replicates: N=12). Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01. The applied statistical test was the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, and lower hinges correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extend from the hinges no further than 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the points beyond the whiskers are treated as outliers. (E) Lineplot depicting the cumulative percentage of ScxGFP cells depending on their distance from the center line of the core explant. The points and the line represent the mean cumulative percentages and the error bands the standard error of the mean (sem). The dashed line indicates locations inside the core area (biological replicates: N=12). Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01. The applied statistical test was the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.

Representative fluorescence microscopy images taken after 7 days in co-culture confirmed a higher total cell number in WT core // ScxGFP fibroblast assembloids compared to KO core // ScxGFP fibroblast assembloids. These cell number differences were not confined to ScxGFP fibroblasts (green) but extended to other populations (blue). In addition, ScxGFP fibroblasts only accumulated around the WT core in WT core // ScxGFP fibroblast assembloids, presumably either through increased core-directional migration or faster proliferation closer to the core. These observations are consistent with IL-6 being essential to increased cellularity and core (damage)-directed migration in this model (Stauber et al., 2021).

We went on to confirm these visual impressions using quantitative methods, finding a significantly increased total cell number in assembloids with a WT core compared to those with a KO core (Figure 6B, Table 4). The effect of IL-6 signaling on the proliferation of ScxGFP fibroblasts (Figure 6C, Table 4) was less pronounced compared to that on all populations, but the trend remained the same. To quantify migration, we analyzed the spatial distribution of ScxGFP fibroblasts by calculating the ratio between core-resident and extrinsic ScxGFP fibroblasts (Figure 6D, Table 4). The WT core // ScxGFP fibroblast assembloids exhibited the highest core-resident to extrinsic ScxGFP fibroblast ratio and KO core // ScxGFP fibroblast assembloids had a significantly lower core-resident to extrinsic ScxGFP fibroblast ratio. The cumulative spatial distribution of ScxGFP fibroblasts (Figure 6E, Table 4) supported these insights.

Table 4. Total cell numbers, ScxGFP cell numbers, and the ratios between core-resident and extrinsic ScxGFP cells in assembloids.

The values were normalized to the wildtype (WT) median and are given as median(IQR).

Condition Total cell number norm. to WT(median(IQR)) ScxGFP cell number norm. to WT(median(IQR)) Core/extrinsic ScxGFP ratio, norm. to WT (median(IQR))
WT core // ScxGFP fibroblasts 100 (20.1)% 100 (19.4)% 100 (52.3)%
WT core // ScxGFP fibroblasts+tocilizumab 87.7 (23.5)% 40.7 (49.3)% 51.5 (14.8)%
KO core // ScxGFP fibroblasts 77.6 (14.1)% 62.2 (66.1)% 73(40)%
KO core // ScxGFP fibroblasts+IL-6 97.7 (22.8)% 89.7 (86.1)% 66.1 (45.9)%

To further confirm the specific impact of IL-6 signaling on overall cell proliferation and core-directed migration of Scx+ fibroblasts, we desensitized the WT core // fibroblast assembloids to IL-6 by neutralizing IL-6R with tocilizumab and attempted to rescue the KO core // fibroblast assembloids by adding recombinant IL-6 to compensate for their reduced IL-6 levels (Figure 6A, bottom panels). In alignment with the previous results and the hypothesis, IL-6 desensitization decreased the total cell number in trend (Figure 6B, Table 4), the ScxGFP cell number significantly (Figure 6C, Table 4), and the ratio between core-resident and extrinsic ScxGFP fibroblasts significantly as well (Figure 6D, Table 4). The addition of recombinant IL-6 to KO core // fibroblast assembloids significantly increased the total cell number and the number of ScxGFP cells, rescuing the WT phenotype of IL-6 enhanced cell proliferation in the extrinsic compartment. However, core-directed migration was not rescued by recombinant IL-6.

Fully in line with transcript signature changes detected in the extrinsic compartment, these data suggest that IL-6 signaling increased local cellularity in at least one of two ways. First, IL-6 stimulated both overall and specific ScxGFP cell proliferation. Second, IL-6 gradient effects (i.e. IL-6 induced secondary gradients) caused core-directed ScxGFP cell migration.

Disrupting IL-6 signaling does not detectably alter Scx+ cell proliferation or recruitment into an acutely damaged Achilles tendon in vivo

After clarifying the role of IL-6 in activating fibroblasts in the assembloid model of chronic tendon disease, we sought to assess whether IL-6 signaling also enhances overall cell proliferation and migration of Scx+ fibroblasts to acute tendon damage. To test this, we first bred IL-6 WT and IL-6 KO mice with ScxGFP mice. Then, we assessed the presence of ScxGFP cells in the Achilles tendons of four IL-6 WT mice compared to those of four IL-6 KO mice 14 days after Achilles tenotomy. In addition, we used an 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining to assess the proliferation of cells within the healing tendon (Figure 7A).

Figure 7. Cell proliferation around and Scx+ fibroblasts recruitment to acutely damaged mouse Achilles tendons 14 days after injury.

(A) Illustrative depiction of the experimental setup and the time schedule. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images from all four mice assessed showing longitudinal mouse hindleg sections from IL-6 wildtype, ScxGFP (IL-6 WT x ScxGFP) Achilles tendons (AT) that underwent tenotomy (left), the contralateral untreated control (middle), as well as sections from IL-6 knock-out (IL-6 KO x ScxGFP) AT that underwent tenotomy (right). In addition to the signal provided by the ScxGFP cells (green), NucBlue was used to identify all cell nuclei (blue), and 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) was used to identify proliferating cells (magenta). The dashed circles indicate the remaining AT stump close to the calcaneus. The healing neo-tendon tissue surrounding the calcaneal AT stump bridges the gap to the AT stump connected to the calf muscles further down (not shown). In both compartments, ScxGFP cell distribution was highly variable across acutely damaged samples, with no observable trends or statistically detectable differences between the conditions (biological replicates: N=4).

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Cell proliferation around and Scx+ fibroblast recruitment to damaged mouse Achilles tendons.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A) Illustrative depiction of the experimental setup and the time schedule. (B) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of mouse hindleg cross-sections from wildtype (WT) Achilles tendons that underwent tenotomy (left), the contralateral untreated control (middle), as well as cross-sections from IL-6 knock-out (KO) Achilles tendons that underwent tenotomy (right). (C) Total number of cells stained with NucBlue. (D) Number of Scx+ cells. (E) Ratio between core-resident and extrinsic Scx+ cells depicted on a logarithmic y-axis (biological replicates: N=7). The upper and lower hinges correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extend from the hinges no further than 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the points beyond the whiskers are treated as outliers. (F) Lineplot depicting the cumulative percentage of Scx+ cells depending on their distance from the Achilles tendon center. The points and the line represent the mean cumulative percentages and their error bands the standard error of the mean (sem). The dashed line indicates locations inside the Achilles tendon stump. Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: *p<0.05. The applied statistical test was the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2. CD146+ and TPPP3+ fibroblast recruitment to damaged mouse Achilles tendons.

Figure 7—figure supplement 2.

(A) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of mouse hindleg sections from wildtype (WT) and IL-6 knock-out (KO) Achilles tendons that underwent unilateral tenotomy. (B) Boxplot reporting the number of CD146+ cells normalized to the WT median. (C) Boxplot reporting the number of TPPP3+ cells normalized to the WT median. In these boxplots, the upper and lower hinges correspond to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extend from the hinges no further than 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the points beyond the whiskers are treated as outliers. (D, E) Lineplots depicting the cumulative percentages of CD146+ and TPPP3+ cells depending on their distance from the Achilles tendon center. The points and the line represent the mean cumulative percentages and the error bands their standard error of the mean (sem). The dashed line indicates locations inside the Achilles tendon stump (biological replicates: N=4). The applied statistical test was the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test and no significant differences were detected.

Overall, the fluorescence microscopy images revealed a strong presence of ScxGFP cells (green) and EdU+ cells (magenta) in the neo-tendon (Figure 7B, tissue around the dashed circles) formed around the calcaneal Achilles tendon stumps (Figure 7B, AT within the dashed circles) after tenotomy (Figure 7B, left), but not in undamaged hindleg tendons (Figure 7B, middle). Similar levels of overall cellularity and presence of ScxGFP and EdU+ cells were observed in the calcaneal Achilles tendon stump and the surrounding neo-tendon of IL-6 WT and IL-6 KO mice. No observable trends or statistically detectable differences in the highly variable and complex ScxGFP cell migration patterns were detected between IL-6 WT and IL-6 KO mice (Figure 7B, left and right).

Activated, recruited, and proliferating extrinsic fibroblasts promote tendinopathy hallmarks in tendon core explants

Building upon the evidence that IL-6 potentiates tendon fibroblast activation and migration to damage in vitro, we then sought to clarify the nature of interactions between these recruited repair cells and the damaged tissue. We asked whether these activated fibroblasts might be capable of driving disease-relevant tissue processes. To assess this, we first looked at transcriptional changes induced in core explants when fibroblasts were present in the artificial extrinsic compartment by comparing them to explants cultured in an initially cell-free hydrogel (Figure 8A).

Figure 8. Transcript analysis of differentially regulated genes and pathways in wildtype (WT) core explants surrounded by a hydrogel seeded with fibroblasts compared to a WT core surrounded by a cell-free hydrogel.

(A) Illustration depicting the assembloid combinations compared here (WT core // fibroblasts vs. WT core // cell-free), the assessed timepoint (d7), and the analyzed compartment (core only). (B) RNA-seq volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Genes colored in red have a log2 (fold change)>0.5, an adjusted p-value<0.05, and are considered to be significantly increased in the core of WT core // fibroblast assembloids. Genes colored in blue have a log2 (fold change)<–0.5, an adjusted p-value<0.05, and are considered to be significantly increased in the core of WT core // cell-free assembloids. The log2 and p-value thresholds are represented by the dashed lines. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top 50 DEGs. Genes are clustered by color with positive (red) or negative (blue) row-scaled z-scores. Columns represent individual samples (biological replicates: N=4). (D) Dotplots depicting a selection of gene ontology (GO) annotations significantly enriched (adjusted p-value<0.05) by the DEGs. The selection was biased by GO biological processes and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) hallmark annotations enriched in the human dataset (Figure 1C and E). The color of the circles represents their adjusted p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. Detailed transcriptome analysis of genes up- and downregulated in wildtype (WT) core explants surrounded by a hydrogel seeded with extrinsic fibroblasts compared to a WT core surrounded by a cell-free hydrogel.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

(A) Illustration of the assembloid combinations compared here (WT core // fibroblasts vs. WT core // cell-free), the assessed timepoint (d7), and the analyzed compartment (core only). (B) Dotplot depicting the top 6 significantly enriched gene sets as determined by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) based on the MSigDB mouse cell-type signature gene sets. The color of the circles represents their p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), the position on the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio), and the +/- signs the direction of the enrichment in the WT core surrounded by fibroblasts compared to the WT core surrounded by a cell-free hydrogel. (C) Detailed annotation of the enrichment map plot clustering the top 30 biological processes significantly enriched by DEG sets. The color of the circles represents their adjusted p-values, the size represents the number of enriched genes (count), and the gray lines connect GO annotations that share the same gene subsets.
Figure 8—figure supplement 2. Overlap between differentially expressed transcripts in in vitro assembloids and differentially expressed transcripts between Achilles tendon fibroblasts from the extrinsic compartment and the tendon core in vivo.

Figure 8—figure supplement 2.

(A) Illustrative depiction of the comparisons whose overlap was investigated here: The core explants of wildtype (WT) core // fibroblast vs. the WT core // cell-free assembloids (in vitro, red) and the extrinsic (paratenon-derived) vs. the core (tendon proper-derived) fibroblasts (in vivo, blue). (B) Venn diagram depicting the number and the overlap (violet) of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as well as the top 7 gene ontology (GO) gene sets for biological processes significantly enriched by the overlapping DEGs. (C) Venn diagram depicting the number and the overlap (violet) of significantly enriched GO annotations for biological processes. (D) Dotplot depicting the top 30 biological processes significantly enriched by DEGs in tendon fibroblasts derived from the extrinsic compartment (paratenon-derived) compared to those derived from the core compartment (tendon proper-derived) colored in a blue to black gradient. The plot is augmented by the data of matched biological processes also significantly enriched in the core of WT core // fibroblast compared to that of the WT core // cell-free assembloids colored in a red to black gradient. The color gradient of the circles represents their adjusted p-values, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).

Exposing WT core explants to fibroblasts (WT core // fibroblasts) for 7 days increased 446 transcripts, decreased 217 transcripts, and left 19,694 transcripts unchanged (Figure 8B and C). In line with the previous paragraphs reporting fibroblast migration in vitro, some of the increased transcripts (i.e. Scx and Sox9) indicated an enrichment of Scx+ and/or Sox9+ fibroblasts in the WT core explants of WT core // fibroblast assembloids compared to those of WT core // cell-free assembloids. Similarly, GSEA on the full MSigDB cell-type signature gene sets proposed an amplified contribution of fibroblasts, fibroblast-like cells, and progenitor cells to the emerging assembloid phenotype (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B). In vivo, extrinsic (i.e. paratenon-derived) fibroblasts differentially express selected genes compared to tendon core (i.e. tendon proper-derived) fibroblasts (Mienaltowski et al., 2019). The GO gene sets annotated with these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) overlap with those enriched by DEGs between WT core // fibroblast and WT core // cell-free assembloids (Figure 8—figure supplement 2A–D). This could mean that the core explants exposed to extrinsic fibroblasts change into more paratenon-like tissue and again highlights the contribution of extrinsic fibroblast migration and accumulation to assembloid behavior.

To compare this phenotype to human tendinopathic tendons, we looked for ECM turnover-related transcripts that were enriched in human tendinopathic tendons compared to normal controls. Indeed, transcripts for Col3a1, Col1a1, Mmp13, Mmp3, and Mmp9 were increased in core explants co-cultured with fibroblasts (Figure 8, Table 5). When combined through ORA, many of the top 30 biological processes enriched by significantly changed transcripts (adjusted p-value<0.01) were also enriched in human tendinopathic tendons (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). The curated list presented here (Figure 8D) pinpoints significantly enriched processes likely to be involved in tendinopathic hallmarks such as ECM turnover and tissue development, hypoxia and glucose metabolism, and hypercellularity.

Table 5. Effect sizes and p-values for selected transcripts.

The data describes differences in transcripts between the core explants from wildtype (WT) core // fibroblasts and those from WT core // cell-free assembloids.

Transcript Effect size p-Value
Col3a1 1.1 8.40E-11
Col1a1 0.8 0.06
Mmp13 0.91 1.20E-06
Mmp3 0.64 0.0006
Mmp9 1.45 0.019
Scx 0.98 0.00006
Sox9 0.6 0.001

Overall, it appears that extrinsic fibroblasts are sufficient to invoke several tendinopathic hallmarks in tendon core explants and accelerated catabolic matrix turnover in particular. We have previously reported an increase of IL-6 in the supernatant of WT core // fibroblast assembloids that correlated with an increased catabolic breakdown of the core (Stauber et al., 2021). The insights gained here connect this catabolic breakdown to gene sets involved in ECM remodeling. Another set of previously published experiments suggests that the ERK1/2 signaling cascade enriched in the core of WT core // fibroblast favors tissue breakdown as well (Blache et al., 2021; Wunderli et al., 2020).

Disrupting IL-6 signaling in core explants diminishes emergence of tendinopathic hallmarks

So far, our results have shown that IL-6 signaling enhances proliferation and migration of fibroblasts toward the tendon core and that the presence of fibroblasts invokes tendinopathy-like changes in the tendon core in vitro. Consequently, the last step was to see whether an IL-6 KO not only prevents the fibroblast migration and proliferation, but also reduces fibroblast-invoked tendinopathic hallmarks in the core. To assess this, we again studied assembloids containing an IL-6 KO core, but this time focused on biological processes emerging in the core by leveraging bulk RNA-seq (Figure 9A).

Figure 9. Transcript analysis of differentially regulated genes and pathways in IL-6 knock-out (KO) core explants surrounded by a hydrogel seeded with fibroblasts compared to a wildtype (WT) core surrounded by fibroblasts.

(A) Illustration depicting the assembloid combinations compared here (KO core // fibroblasts vs. WT core // fibroblasts), the assessed timepoint (d7), and the analyzed compartment (core only). (B) RNA-seq volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Genes colored in red have a log2 (fold change)>0.5, a p-value<0.05, and are considered to be significantly increased in the core of KO core // fibroblast assembloids. Genes colored in blue have a log2 (fold change)<–0.5, a p-value<0.05, and are considered to be significantly increased in the core of WT core // fibroblast assembloids. The log2 and p-value thresholds are represented by the dashed lines. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top 50 DEGs. Genes are clustered by color with positive (red) or negative (blue) row-scaled z-scores. Columns represent individual samples (biological replicates: N=4). (D) Dotplots depicting a selection of gene ontology (GO) annotations significantly enriched (adjusted p-value<0.05) by the DEGs in both the WT core // cell-free vs. WT core // fibroblast assembloid comparison (red to black gradient) and the KO core // fibroblast vs. WT core // fibroblast assembloid comparison (light blue to black gradient). The selection was biased by enriched GO biological process and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) hallmark annotations in the human dataset (Figure 1C and E). The color gradient of the circles represents their adjusted p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio). (E) Venn diagram depicting the number and the overlap (violet) of significantly enriched GO annotations for biological processes between the WT core // cell-free vs. WT core // fibroblast assembloid comparison (red) and the KO core // fibroblast vs. WT core // fibroblast assembloid comparison (blue). (F) Linear elastic moduli of devitalized (Devital.), IL-6 knock-out (KO), and wildtype (WT) core explants surrounded by hydrogel-embedded fibroblast populations at day 21 normalized to day 0 (biological replicates: N=8). The data are displayed as barplots with mean ± standard error of the mean (sem). The applied statistical test was the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test and yielded no significant differences.

Figure 9.

Figure 9—figure supplement 1. Detailed transcriptome analysis of genes up- and downregulated in knock-out (KO) core explants surrounded by a hydrogel seeded with fibroblasts compared to a wildtype (WT) core surrounded by a hydrogel seeded with fibroblasts.

Figure 9—figure supplement 1.

(A) Illustration depicting the assembloid combinations compared here (KO core // fibroblasts vs. WT core // fibroblasts), the assessed timepoint (d7), and the analyzed compartment (core only). (B) Dotplot depicting the top 6 significantly enriched gene sets as determined by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) based on the MSigDB mouse cell-type signature gene sets. The +/- signs indicate the direction of the enrichment in the KO core surrounded by fibroblasts compared to the WT core surrounded by fibroblasts. (C) Dotplot showing the top 20 gene ontology (GO) gene sets for biological processes significantly enriched by transcripts increased in the core of KO core // fibroblast assembloids. (D) Dotplot showing the top 20 GO gene sets for biological processes significantly enriched by transcripts decreased in the core of KO core // fibroblast assembloids. (E) Dotplot showing the top 20 GO gene sets for molecular functions significantly enriched by transcripts increased in the core of KO core // fibroblast assembloids. (F) Dotplot showing the top 20 GO gene sets for molecular functions significantly enriched by transcripts decreased in the core of KO core // fibroblast assembloids. In all the dotplots, the color of the circles represents their p-value, the size the number of enriched genes (count), and the position on the x-axis the number of enriched genes in ratio to the total number of genes annotated to the gene set (gene ratio).

On the transcript level, we found 276 upregulated, 192 downregulated, and 20,204 unchanged genes in the core of KO core // fibroblast assembloids compared to that of WT core // fibroblast assembloids (Figure 9B and C). To see whether an IL-6 KO would partially reverse fibroblast-invoked hallmarks, we matched the list of DEGs (p-value <0.01) to the signatures in the GO database and then compared the surfacing enriched biological processes with those enriched by DEGs between the core of a WT core // fibroblast assembloid and a WT core // cell-free assembloid. The largest overlap lay in the signaling pathways (Wnt, ERK1/2, and IL-6), where 5/5 signatures for biological processes remained similarly enriched (Figure 9E). We found slightly fewer overlapping signatures connected to ECM turnover (6/14) and cellularity (6/18) while there seemed to be a disconnect in hypoxia and glucose metabolism (2/8). Overall, about a third of all signatures enriched by the presence of fibroblasts were also enriched by the IL-6 KO (Figure 9E). In contrast to the signatures emerging from the presence of fibroblasts however, the respective contribution of transcripts increased and decreased by the IL-6 KO to the enriched GO biological processes and molecular functions indicates a decreasing cellularity and ECM turnover in the core (Figure 9—figure supplement 1), which could mean that IL-6 signaling contributes to the gene expression behind these tendinopathy hallmarks.

As we have already demonstrated the tissue-level effects of IL-6 signaling on cellularity (Figure 6), we next wanted to examine the tissue-level consequences of changed transcript signatures for ECM turnover on core biomechanics. To do so, we measured the assembloid’s linear elastic modulus as an indicator for their ability to resist longitudinal tension, which is one of the main functions of adult tendons (Figure 9F). In WT core // fibroblast assembloids, the linear elastic modulus decreased the most between the initial clamping of the core explant and 21 days of co-culture (light blue). The linear elastic modulus of assembloids containing a KO core (violet) or a WT core explant devitalized through multiple freeze-thaw cycles (black) decreased as well, but not as fast or as strongly. In connection with the bulk RNA-seq data, the changes in the assembloid’s ability to resist tension suggest that IL-6 signaling accelerates (catabolic) ECM turnover.

Normally, it would be hard to predict the effect of an accelerated catabolic ECM turnover in vitro on wound healing in vivo since both ECM degradation and synthesis are required to replace damaged tissue structures. However, previous studies have already reported a delayed wound healing response in IL-6 KO mice and our experiments here suggest that the decelerated catabolic ECM turnover could be responsible for this (Lin et al., 2006).

Discussion

IL-6 is an attractive translational research target. Signaling cascades related to IL-6 are upregulated in tendon tissues after exercise, acute tissue damage, and in chronic tendon disease (Nakama et al., 2006; Legerlotz et al., 2012; Langberg et al., 2002). Little is currently understood of the precise role that IL-6 plays in these processes (Arvind and Huang, 2021). The goal of the present work was to clarify the role of IL-6 signaling in the tissues of non-sheathed tendons in the context of chronic damage, with a particular focus on inter-compartmental crosstalk between the damaged tendon core and extrinsic (reparative) fibroblasts populations targeted by it.

We first reanalyzed existing microarray data of (non-sheathed) tendinopathic tendons to verify a hypothesized (dys)functional role of IL-6 that seems to run partially via the JAK/STAT pathway enriched by transcripts increased in the tendinopathic samples. The JAK/STAT pathway interweaves with ERK1/2 downstream, which fits with recent data from our lab showing that ERK inhibition alone can prevent tendon matrix deterioration while reducing the secretion of IL-11, another member of the IL-6 cytokine family that was also upregulated in the tendinopathic tendons analyzed here (Blache et al., 2021; Wunderli et al., 2020). More generally, overactivation of JAK/STAT/ERK has been associated with autoimmune arthritis (Ernst and Jenkins, 2004; Eulenfeld et al., 2012).

While analysis of human samples indicated the expression of IL6, IL6ST, and ADAM10 (known to transform membrane-bound IL-6R into soluble IL-6R) to be upregulated in tendinopathic tendons, the expression of IL6RA itself was downregulated. We speculate that this points toward increased trans-signaling aimed at stromal cells unable to express IL6RA, in this tendinopathic context particularly the stromal fibroblasts and fibroblast-like cell populations indicated to be enriched by the cell-type signatures (Nowell et al., 2003; Rose-John, 2012). This theory is supported by GO terms enriched in tendinopathic samples compared to controls relating to increased morphogenesis and wound healing, both processes supposedly powered by (reparative) fibroblasts (Dyment et al., 2014; Niu et al., 2020). Most of the remaining top 20 enriched GO terms pointed toward increased cell proliferation, potentially increasing the leverage of the proliferating fibroblasts. Indeed, staining human samples with CD90, an established marker of reparative fibroblasts typically present in healing tissues, Ho et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021, confirmed a higher percentage of CD90+ cells in (non-sheathed) tendinopathic compared to normal control tendons.

While beneficial in controlled dosages during normal wound healing, both excessive hypercellularity and imbalanced wound healing are hallmarks of tendinopathy (Li et al., 2007; Millar et al., 2021; Sharma and Maffulli, 2006; Harvey et al., 2019). To decipher their connections to IL-6 signaling, we investigated IL-6/IL-6R concentration gradients, sources, and targets in patient-derived tissue sections. In tendinopathic patients, the presence of IL-6 over the whole tissue was smaller than expected. However, while IL-6 seemed to be largely confined to the extrinsic compartment in normal control tendons, it was distributed across compartments in tendinopathic tendons. The resulting gradient differences could play a role in the emergence of disease hallmarks (Crowe et al., 2023). In contrast to the relative transcript-level decrease of IL6RA in tendinopathic tendons indicated by the microarray, its presence was increased on the protein level. Although we can only speculate on the clearance rate of both soluble and membrane-bound IL-6R as well as of the cells carrying them, the mismatch in its presence on the gene transcription and the protein expression levels could be a legacy from earlier disease stages.

To identify sources and targets of IL-6 and IL-6R, we co-stained the tendinopathic tissue sections with established markers for macrophages (CD68) and reparative fibroblasts (CD90). Presuming that IL-6 is more concentrated around its sources than its targets due to diffusion, it seems that although both CD68+ and CD90+ cells express IL-6, the contribution of CD90+ cells is significantly larger. This observation is in line with sources of IL-6 identified in growing mouse tendons (Bautista et al., 2023). The number of CD90+ cells among IL-6R+ cells was also significantly larger than that of CD68+ cells. Since it has yet to be shown that stromal fibroblasts express and translate IL-6R, a better explanation might be that the IL-6R on CD90+ cells were originally produced by, i.e., the CD68+ cells and ended up on CD90+ cells as part of a trans-signaling process. Why and how CD90+ cells are targeted by soluble IL-6R as part of IL-6 trans-signaling could be an interesting part of future research.

To dissect the specific effect of IL-6 signaling on reparative fibroblasts, we turned to tendon assembloids: hybrid explant // hydrogel models of core tendon damage and repair that were recently developed in our lab and which identified an underloaded core explant as a potentially biologically relevant source of IL-6 (Stauber et al., 2021). The simultaneously increased and imbalanced matrix tissue turnover perpetuated by the crosstalk between the core and an extrinsic fibroblast population seemed to put the system into a prime position to decipher the connections between IL-6, hypercellularity, and (catabolic) matrix turnover. Furthermore, their compartmentalized design adequately mimics the structure of non-sheathed tendons.

Replacing the WT core explant with an IL-6 KO core explant in our assembloids was sufficient to reduce the expression of genes in gene sets related to matrix turnover, proteolysis, cell proliferation, and cell migration in the extrinsic fibroblast population. We confirmed the IL-6-induced gene-level differences regarding cell migration by exploiting trackable ScxGFP fibroblasts and demonstrated effective manipulation of both recruitment and proliferation of ScxGFP cells through IL-6. We did so by using the IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab to desensitize resident cell populations to IL-6 and recombinant IL-6 to replace the IL-6 not secreted by an IL-6 KO core. Recombinant IL-6 rescuing proliferation but not migration of ScxGFP cells highlights the necessity of an IL-6 gradient and/or the establishment of a secondary cytokine gradient (e.g. TGF-β) by IL-6 (Tan et al., 2021). Alternatively, IL-6 has also been described as an energy allocator in other musculoskeletal tissues and could in this function be accelerating a diverse range of processes (i.e. migration) by increasing the baseline cell metabolism (Kistner et al., 2022). Fittingly, the extrinsic cell populations around an IL-6 KO core upregulated biological processes related to oxidative stress and hypoxia, which indicates a disrupted energy allocation. Since we found similar biological processes to be positively enriched in human tendinopathic tendons compared to controls, future studies should more closely examine the role of hypoxic signaling in the pathogenesis of tendinopathy.

To transfer these insights from our in vitro experiments to an in vivo setup, we used an Achilles tenotomy model of the in vivo tendon damage response. Although the number of Scx+ fibroblasts did increase in injured tendons, the in vivo experiments did not detect an effect of IL-6 on activating Scx+ fibroblasts (Korcari et al., 2022) and making them migrate into or proliferate faster in the damaged and unloaded Achilles tendon stump. In addition, previous studies with mice subjected to a patellar punch procedure reported only marginally reduced mechanical properties in the healing patellar tendon of IL-6 KO mice compared to the WT after an acute injury (Lin et al., 2006). However, we are cautious in interpreting these in vivo results, mainly because 14 days after an Achilles tenotomy, the tendon niche condition represents an acute rather than a chronic tendon lesion (Jones et al., 2006; Sugg, 2014). Also, even with breeding a novel IL-6 KO x ScxGFP mouse line to alleviate widely known problems of Scx antibodies, the collagen matrix still caused considerable background noise in our images (Lin et al., 2006). Furthermore, the ablation of IL-6 might have led to the elevation of compensatory IL-6 superfamily ligands (or other attractant chemokines or cytokines) and one can currently only speculate on their in vivo distribution as well as the resulting patterns of fibroblast migration (Dyment et al., 2013; Langberg et al., 2002). To confirm this hypothesis, future in vivo studies could deploy IL-6 inhibitors targeting other members of the IL-6 superfamily as well.

Since the migrating Scx+ fibroblasts in vitro were apparently targeting the damaged core tissue (likely to support the limited intrinsic regenerative potential of the explanted tendon core secreting IL-6 in the first place) (Stauber et al., 2020), the next set of experiments we conducted in this work focused on the effects of the activated and recruited fibroblasts on the tendon core.

According to existing literature and results presented here, Scx+ fibroblasts are increasingly present in in vivo murine adult tendon lesions (Dyment et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2021) and depleting them alternately improves or impairs adult tendon healing depending on the timepoint of depletion (Korcari et al., 2022; Best et al., 2021). One underlying reason could be that adult, Scx+ fibroblasts hold a bi-fated potential that enables a cartilage-like differentiation when exposed to mechanical compression or tensile unloading (Howell et al., 2017; Kult et al., 2021). Our in vitro assembloid model captured these behaviors as well with increased Scx/Sox9 transcripts and enriched gene sets indicating a stronger presence of fibroblasts alongside cartilage development in a core surrounded by (migrating) fibroblasts compared to one embedded in a cell-free hydrogel. Besides, genes differentially expressed in a core explant surrounded by fibroblasts enriched gene sets related to hypercellularity, ERK1/2 signaling, oxygen/glucose metabolism, and ECM turnover. Most of these processes were reduced in an IL-6 KO core, speculatively because of the reduced presence of extrinsic fibroblasts resulting from the reduced migration and proliferation. On the tissue level, we also found signs for a decreased catabolic matrix turnover in the more stable mechanical properties of IL-6 KO core explants, a process likely linked to ERK1/2 signaling (Blache et al., 2021).

In summary, our data consistently point to IL-6 signaling targeting reparative fibroblasts being upregulated in chronic human (non-sheathed) tendon lesions in a manner that directly leads to fibroblast recruitment and proliferation as well as aberrant morphogenesis/matrix turnover. This activity contributes to typical hallmarks of tendinopathy including hypercellularity and loss of biomechanical tissue integrity.

Materials and methods

Human microarray data analysis

We reanalyzed a microarray dataset (GEO: GSE26051) from 2011 with contemporary methods (principal component analysis, volcano plots, heatmaps, GSEA, and ORA), focusing on the IL-6 signaling cascade. All steps from downloading the dataset to the differential expression computation were conducted in RStudio (‘Prairie Trillium’, https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio; rstudio, 2022) running R version 4.1.2. Overall, we closely followed the steps described here: https://sbc.shef.ac.uk/geo_tutorial/tutorial.nb.html (last visited: May 2, 2022). First, we log2-transformed the expression values and checked their distribution with boxplots. Since the original dataset was gathered from a wide variety of anatomical locations and differently aged patients (Supplementary file 1), we started with a principal component analysis to filter out outliers. Based on the clustering, we identified differences between sheathed and non-sheathed tendons (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). For the following analysis, we therefore excluded samples gathered from sheathed tendons:

GSM639749 (EDC), GSM639751 (Flexor-Pronator), GSM639756 (Flexor-Pronator), GSM639761 (ECRB), GSM639765 (ECRL), GSM639772 (ECRB), GSM639774 (Flexor-Pronator), GSM639779 (Flexor-Pronator), GSM639784 (ECRB), GSM639788 (ECRB).

To improve the power to detect DEGs, we filtered out genes with very low expression. We considered 50% of genes to not be expressed and therefore used the median expression as the cut-off. In addition, we only kept genes expressed in more than two samples for further analysis and calculated the average of replicated probes. Afterward, we applied the empirical Bayes’ step to receive the differential expression values and p-values. We plotted the DEGs as a volcano plot and annotated IL-6 signaling-related genes, other cytokines of the IL-6 family, their respective receptors, and genes involved in matrix turnover. Here, we considered genes with a p-value<0.05 to be differentially expressed. In addition, we plotted the row scaled z-scores of a selection of the annotated genes in a heatmap.

To produce the GO annotations, we fed the list of IDs from DEGs into the enrichGO function from the clusterProfiler package (version 3.0.4, here, last visited: October 31, 2022) using the org.Hs.eg.db as reference and the Benjamini-Hochberg method to calculate the false discovery rate (FDR)/adjust the p-values. To visualize the data, we used the dotplot function from the enrichPlot package (https://rdrr.io/bioc/enrichplot/, last visited: October 31, 2022). We also looked at the increased (logFC>0) and decreased (logFC<0) transcripts in isolation to estimate their contribution to the enrichment and give it directionality.

For the GSEA performed in RStudio with clusterProfiler, we used the human hallmark and the cell-type signature gene set annotations from the molecular signature database (MSigDB, https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/, last visited: October 31, 2022) after ranking the genes according to their p-value. We used the following input parameters: pvalueCutoff = 1.00, minGSSize = 15, maxGSSize = 500, and eps = 0. Lastly, we used the gseaplot and dotplot functions from the enrichPlot package to plot the data and the sign of the enrichment score/NES to estimate the directionality. The exact code can be found in the supplementary material (Source code 1).

Human immunohistological stainings

Tendon tissues from tendinopathic and normal control tendons were collected with informed consent including consent to publish from human patients undergoing treatment at the University Hospital Balgrist (ethical permission numbers 2016-02665 and 2020-0119 as approved by the institutional review board of the Canton of Zurich). Patient data and images are depicted in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. We cut transversal cryosections (10 µm thickness) using a low-profile microtome blade (DB80 LX, BioSys Laboratories), collected them on a glass slide, and let them dry for 1 hr before storing them at –80°C until further use. Prior to staining, sections were air-dried for 30 min at RT (room temperature) and washed 3× with PBS for 5 min each. Then, sections were permeabilized and blocked with 3% BSA (bovine serum albumin) in PBS-T (PBS+0.1% Triton X) for 1 hr at RT. We washed the sections again, added the primary antibody for CD90 (Abcam, ab181469, diluted 1:100 for the co-staining with IL-6R and GeneTex, GTX130072 diluted 1:200 for the co-staining with IL-6), CD68 (Abcam, ab955, diluted 1:50), IL-6 (R&D Systems, MAB2061R, diluted 1:200), and IL-6R (Absolute Antibody, ab00737-23.0, diluted 1:100) in PBS-T with 1% BSA. We covered them with parafilm and left them overnight in a humid chamber at 4°C. Afterward, we washed them again (3×5 min with PBS) before adding the matching secondary antibodies (diluted 1:200 in PBS with 1% BSA) to the samples as well as the secondary antibody controls.

The sections were then washed again (3×5 min with PBS+1×5 min with ultra-pure water) before mounting the coverslip with ROTIMount FluorCare DAPI (Roth). We used the Leica SP8 automated inverse confocal laser scanning microscope for acquiring the images, which we then processed with ImageJ 1.53q and RStudio (Source code 2 and Source code 3).

Mouse tissue harvest

All animal experiments were approved by the responsible authorities (Canton Zurich license number ZH104-18 and ZH058-21).

We extracted tail tendon core explants and Achilles tendons from 12- to 15-week-old male and female Tgf(Scx-GFP)1Stzr and B6.129S2-Il6tm1Kopf/J mice (knock-out: KO, wildtype: WT) as described previously (Figure 4B and C; Stauber et al., 2021; Stauber et al., 2024). We isolated the core explants from the tail and only kept those with a mean diameter between 100 and 150 µm in standard culture medium (DMEM/F12 GlutaMAX with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% amphotericin, 200 µM L-ascorbic acid) until clamping them. Meanwhile, we separated the Achilles tendon from the calcaneus and the calf muscle using a scalpel and washed them with PBS before starting the digestion process (Standard culture medium without L-ascorbic acid but 2 mg/ml collagenase for 24 hr at 37°C). After digestion, we cultured the cells on 2D tissue culture plastic in standard culture medium and used the resulting mixed fibroblast population between passage 2 and 4 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Figure 4—figure supplement 2). All medium components were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, except for the ascorbic acid (Wako Chemicals) and the collagenase (Thermo Fisher).

Collagen isolation

We isolated collagen-1 from rat tail tendon fascicles following an established protocol (Rajan et al., 2006). Briefly, tendon explants were extracted from the tail of adult (>8 weeks) female Sprague-Dawley rats with surgical clamps. Then, the collagen was dissolved by sequentially putting the core explants into acetone (5 min), 70% isopropanol (5 min), and finally 0.02 N acetic acid (48 hr). The resulting viscous solution was mixed in a house-ware blender and then frozen at –20°C. Lyophilization at –20°C turned the viscous solution into a dry collagen sponge, which was stored at –80°C and aliquots thawed when needed. Upon thawing, the collagen aliquot was mixed with 0.02 N acetic acid and then centrifuged (15,000 rpm for 45 min) at 4°C. The supernatant was then sterilized with SPECTRAPOR dialysis bags first in non-sterile acetic acid (1 hr), then 1% chloroform in ddH2O (1 hr), and finally sterile acetic acid (three times for 2 days each). The concentration of the resulting solution was determined with a hydroxyproline assay (Sigma-Aldrich, MAK008), the purity was assessed with SDS-PAGE and western blots, and the solution itself was stored at 4°C until usage in the experiments.

Hydrogel preparation, core explant embedding, and assembloid culture

As described previously (Stauber et al., 2021; Stauber et al., 2024), core explants were fixated with clamps, placed into molds lining silicone chambers, and tensioned. These molds were then filled with cell-free or extrinsic fibroblast-laden collagen hydrogels. One hydrogel consisted of 10 µl PBS (20×), 1.28 µl of 1 M NaOH (125×), 8.72 µl double-distilled water (ddH2O, 23×), 80 µl collagen-1 (2.5× or 1.6 mg/ml) and 100 µl culture media or cell suspension (2×). All hydrogel components were kept on ice to prevent pre-mature crosslinking. Co-culture medium (DMEM/F12 high glucose, 10% FBS, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% amphotericin, 200 µM L-ascorbic acid, 20 ng/ml macrophage-colony stimulating factor) was added to stable hydrogels after 50 min of polymerization at 37°C and tension was released. The assembloids were then cultured under tendinopathic niche conditions (37°C, 20% O2) with two media changes per week until the determined timepoint (Wunderli et al., 2020). We used a final concentration of 25 ng/ml recombinant IL-6 (PeproTech, 216-16) in those assembloids to be stimulated by it, and a final concentration of 10 µg/ml tocilizumab (TargetMol, T9911) in those assembloids to be inhibited by it.

RNA isolation for genome-wide RNA-seq (bulk RNA-seq)

We pooled 20–24× 2 cm core explants and 2 extrinsic fibroblast-laden collagen hydrogels separate from each other and snap-froze them in liquid nitrogen. The core explant pools were generated from a single mouse and represent one biological replicate each. The collagen hydrogel pools contained a mixed population comprising migratory cells from the embedded core (same mouse) and the initially seeded mixed fibroblast population (cells pooled from six mice). The frozen samples were pulverized by cryogenic grinding (FreezerMill 6870, SPEX SamplePrep) and further processed with the RNeasy micro kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We used the NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer 3.7.1 (Thermo Fisher) to measure RNA concentration and purity, and the 4200 TapeStation System (Agilent) to measure RNA quality. For each condition (WT core // cell-free, WT core // fibroblasts, KO core // fibroblasts), all six of the collagen hydrogels pools but only four of the core explant pools passed both integrity control (RIN≥2) and had a sufficiently high RNA concentration (30–100 ng/µl) for genome-wide RNA-seq.

We submitted those pools to the functional genomics center Zurich (https://fgcz.ch/, last visited May 6, 2022) for the Illumina (NovaSeq 6000) TruSeq TotalRNA stranded sequencing protocol including library construction from total RNA using ribo-depletion, library QC, sequencing, and data delivery.

RNA-seq data processing and bioinformatic analysis

We used the R-based SUSHI framework of the Functional Genomics Center Zurich (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) to perform primary level bioinformatics. Specifically, we used the FastqcApp, the FastqScreenApp, and the RnaBamStatsApp for quality control, the KallistoApp (sleuth) to calculate transcript abundance after pseudoalignment, the CountQCApp to quality control after counting reads, and the DESeq2App for differential expression analysis. We then used the shiny toolset developed by the Functional Genomics Center Zurich (https://github.com/fgcz/bfabricShiny, copy archived at Functional Genomics Center Zurich ETHZ | UZH, 2022, last visited May 6, 2022) based on b-fabric and R to generate the annotated volcano plots, heatmaps, and gene set functional enrichment by applying the hypergeometric ORA with the following settings:

Volcano plot

Comparison p-Value p-Value threshold Log2FC threshold
Core of WT core // cell-free –
Core of WT core // fibroblasts
FDR-adjusted 0.05 0.5
Core of WT core // fibroblasts –
Core of KO core // fibroblasts
Raw 0.05 0.5
Fibroblasts from WT core // fibroblasts –
Fibroblasts from KO core // fibroblasts
Raw 0.05 0.5

Heatmap

Comparison #Genes Scale Count method
WT core // cell-free –
WT core // fibroblasts
Top 50 up and down Diverging Normalized+Log2
Core of WT core // fibroblasts –
Core of KO core // fibroblasts
Top 50 up and down Diverging Normalized+Log2
Fibroblasts from WT core // fibroblasts –
Fibroblasts from KO core // fibroblasts
Top 50 up and down Diverging Normalized+Log2

Overrepresentation analysis

Comparison Input p-value Output p-value
WT core // cell-free –
WT core // fibroblasts
FDR-adjusted<0.01 FDR-adjusted<0.05
Core of WT core // fibroblasts –
Core of KO core // fibroblasts
Raw<0.01 FDR-adjusted<0.05
Fibroblasts from WT core // fibroblasts –
Fibroblasts from KO core // fibroblasts
Raw<0.01 FDR-adjusted<0.05

We also looked at the increased (logFC>0) and decreased (logFC<0) transcripts in isolation to estimate their contribution to the enrichment and give it directionality. The emapplot of enriched biological processes independent of increased and decreased transcripts was generated in RStudio using the enrichPlot package.

We again used RStudio and the clusterProfiler package to perform the GSEA, taking the mouse hallmark and the cell-type signature gene set annotations from the molecular signature database (MSigDB, https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/, last visited: October 31, 2022) as reference after ranking the genes according to their signed log2 ratio. We used the following input parameters: pvalueCutoff = 1.00, minGSSize = 15, maxGSSize = 500, and eps = 0. Lastly, we used the gseaplot and dotplot functions from the enrichPlot package to plot the data and the sign of the enrichment score/NES to estimate the directionality.

The RNA-seq data gathered from assembloids as discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (Edgar et al., 2002) and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE214015 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE214015).

The in vivo mouse RNA-seq data comparing paratenon-derived to tendon proper-derived fibroblasts have previously been published in an open-access database (PRJNA399554) (Mienaltowski et al., 2013). To reanalyze this data, we used the same tools and parameters as for the assembloid analysis (GO input: FDR-adjusted p-value<0.01). The overlapping DEGs and GO terms were calculated and the resulting Venn diagrams plotted with basic RStudio functions (i.e. intersect & draw.pairwise.venn).

Quantifying total cell proliferation, ScxGFP cell proliferation, and ScxGFP cell recruitment to WT and KO core explants

In the assembloids used here, core explants from WT and homozygous IL-6 KO B6.129S2-Il6tm1Kopf/J mice were embedded with ScxGFP fibroblasts from homo- and heterozygous Tgf(Scx-GFP)1Stzr mice. After 7 days, the assembloids were removed from the clamps and washed with PBS before staining them with ethidium homodimer (EthD-1, Sigma-Aldrich, 2 mM stock in DMSO) diluted to 4 µM with PBS (20 min, 37°C). They were then again washed with PBS, fixated with 4% formaldehyde (Roti-Histofix, Karlsruhe) for 1 hr at RT, washed again with PBS, and stored in PBS at 4°C. Immediately before the imaging, nuclei were stained with NucBlue Live Ready Probes Reagent (R37605, Thermo Fisher) for 1 hr at RT. We used the Nikon Eclipse Ti2 confocal scanning microscope controlled by NIS-Elements to acquire the images (three per sample), which we then processed with ImageJ 1.53q. Briefly, we first registered all cell locations by creating a mask from the NucBlue channel. Then, we put this mask over the ScxGFP channel and measured the fluorescence intensity at the identified cell locations. We then transferred the signal intensity per location data to RStudio, where we first calculated the total cell numbers of all the images of one sample combined and normalized them to the WT median. Afterward, we determined the fluorescence threshold for the ScxGFP-signal (using density plots and a negative control image) and applied this threshold to the dataset. We then calculated the total ScxGFP cell numbers for each sample and normalized them to the WT median. Finally, we combined the cell location with the fluorescence intensity data to find the distance from the core where most of the ScxGFP cells were located and to calculate the ratio between ScxGFP present at the core and those present in the surrounding extrinsic hydrogel (Source code 4, Source code 5).

Quantifying mechanical properties of assembloids

We mounted the assembloids to a custom-made uniaxial stretching device equipped with a load cell as described previously (Stauber et al., 2021). After five cycles of pre-conditioning to 1% L0, the assembloids were then stretched up to 2% L0 to measure the linear elastic modulus (Emod) with a pre-load of 0.03 N. This measurement was repeated after 21 days (d21) of culture. We used MATLAB R2017a and RStudio to read out the linear elastic modulus and normalize it to the measurement immediately after assembloid fabrication (d0). Media was changed every 2–3 days. For the corresponding condition, the core explants were devitalized by snap-freezing them repeatedly in liquid nitrogen.

Achilles tenotomy

Adult WT and homozygous IL-6 KO B6.129S2-Il6tm1Kopf/J (Kopf et al., 1994) x Tg(Scx-GFP)1Stzr mice (between 12 and 15 weeks of age) of both genders were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation. While the mice were anesthetized, we transected the Achilles tendon of the right hindlimb by creating a small incision in the tendon midsubstance (Figure 7A). The contralateral hindlimb was used as the undamaged control. After the surgical intervention, we closed the skin wound with an 8/O prolene suture (Ethicon, W8703) and administered an analgesic (buprenorphine, 0.1 mg/kg s.c., 26 G needle). At 1 week (Figure 7—figure supplements 1 and 2) and 2 weeks (Figure 7) post-tenotomy, we injected 10 µl/g of EdU into each mouse of the 3 weeks group and euthanized them 24 hr later with CO2. We collected the plantaris and Achilles tendon/neotendon from both hindlegs for histology. The isolated tissues were placed in OCT (TissueTek), cooled down on dry ice, and then stored at –80°C until further use.

Immunofluorescence microscopy of mouse Achilles tendon sections

We cut transversal (1 week) and longitudinal (3 weeks) cryosections (10 µm thickness) using a low-profile microtome blade (DB80 LX, BioSys Laboratories), collected them on a glass slide, and let them dry for 1 hr before storing them at –80°C until further use. Prior to staining, sections were air-dried for 30 min at RT and washed 3× with PBS for 5 min each. Then, sections were permeabilized and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS-T (PBS+0.1% Triton X) for 1 hr at RT. We then washed the sections again and incubated the sections that were previously stained with EdU with a reaction cocktail (Jena Bioscience, CLK-074, CuAAC Cell Reaction Buffer Kit [THPTA based]) prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (440 µl reaction buffer, 10 µl CuSO4, 1 µl (2 µM) Alexa Fluor azide 647, and 50 µl reducing agent) at RT for 45 min. We washed the sections again, added the primary antibody for Scx (abcam, ab58655, diluted 1:200 in PBS-T with 1% BSA), TPPP3 (Invitrogen, PA5-24925, 1:200), or CD146 (BIOSS, bs-1618R, 1:200) to the sections from the 1-week timepoint, and a GFP-antibody (Abcam, ab290, 1:500 in PBS-T with 1% BSA) to those from the 3-week timepoint. We covered all the sections with parafilm and left them overnight in a humid chamber at 4°C. Afterward, we washed them again (3×5 min with PBS) before adding the matching secondary antibodies (diluted 1:200 in PBS with 1% BSA) to the samples as well as the secondary antibody controls.

The sections were then washed again (3×5 min with PBS+1×5 min with ultra-pure water) before mounting the coverslip with ROTIMount FluorCare DAPI (Roth). We used the Nikon Eclipse Ti2 confocal scanning microscope controlled by NIS-Elements for acquiring the images, which we then processed with ImageJ 1.53q and RStudio as described previously (see ‘Quantifying total cell proliferation, ScxGFP cell proliferation, and ScxGFP cell recruitment to WT and KO core explants’). To quantify the migration through the location of Scx+/TPPP+/CD146+ cells in Figure 7—figure supplements 1 and 2, we defined the lesional Achilles tendon area as a circle with a 480 μm radius set in the center of the Achilles tendon.

The researcher performing the staining, imaging, and analysis of the Achilles tendon sections was blinded to the conditions by marking the samples with numbers only.

Secretome analysis

Culture medium was enriched with the secretome of the different assembloids (WT core // cell-free, KO core // cell-free, WT fibroblasts in a hydrogel) for 3 days and until day 7 of the assembloid/hydrogel culture. IL-6 was quantified using a custom-made multiplex U-PLEX for mouse biomarkers (Meso Scale Discovery) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Plates were read with the MESO Quickplex SQ120 (Meso Scale Discovery) and analyzed with Discovery Workbench 4.0.13 (https://www.mesoscale.com/en/products_and_services/software). The plate was read with the Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer (Biotek), and the data were analyzed with RStudio.

Statistical analysis and graph design

Data curation, statistical analysis, and plotting was done in RStudio (‘Prairie Trillium’, 9f796939, February 16, 2022, https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio, copy archived at rstudio, 2022) running R version 4.1.2. For normally distributed datasets, statistical information was obtained by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc tests for pairwise comparisons. Else, the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied, directionally matching the data (less, greater, two-sided). For all tests, we tested the level of p-values. The mean and the standard error of the mean (sem) were reported for the following data: cumulative percentages of ScxGFP fibroblasts in assembloids, elastic modulus of the assembloids, and cumulative percentages of Scx+/TPPP+/CD146+ cells in the in vivo tenotomy model. We used bar and/or point plots to depict the mean and error bars/bands to depict the sem. We reported the median and interquartile range (IQR) in assembloids for the total cell number, the number of ScxGFP cells, and the ratio between core-resident and extrinsic ScxGFP cells, as well as for the total cell number, the number of Scx+ cells, and the ratio between Achilles and neotendon-resident Scx+/ TPPP+/CD146+ cells in the in vivo tenotomy. These values were depicted as boxplots with the upper and lower hinges corresponding to the first and third quartile (25th and 75th percentile), the middle one to the median, the whiskers extending from the upper/lower hinge to the largest/smallest value no further than 1.5 times the IQR, and dots representing data beyond the whiskers. Results of the statistical analysis are indicated as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.01.

The open-source graphics software Inkscape 0.92.3 (https://inkscape.org/, last visited May 9, 2022) was used to finalize the graph design.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the ETH Grant 1-005733. We would like to thank the Functional Genomics Center Zurich, and in particular Lennart Opitz and Dr. Maria Domenica Moccia, for their support on the RNA-seq data analysis and Dr. Roberto Fiore from the System Neuroscience Lab at ETH Zurich for providing the rat tails for the collagen-1 extraction. We further acknowledge Dr. Evi Masschelein for performing the Achilles tenotomies and the Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics for the access to their Tapestation. We also thank our own Lab Technicians Barbara Niederöst and Maja Bollhalder for their practical and emotional support. Finally, we thank Dr. Knut Husmann and Dr. Annamari Katariina Alitalo for their help and support with obtaining the license for animal experimentation and animal husbandry.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Jess G Snedeker, Email: jess.snedeker@hest.ethz.ch.

Valerie Horsley, Yale University, United States.

Hiroshi Takayanagi, The University of Tokyo, Japan.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grant:

  • ETH Zürich Foundation 1-005733 to Katrien De Bock.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Software, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

Tendon tissues from tendinopathic and normal control tendons were collected with informed consent including consent to publish from human patients undergoing treatment at the University Hospital Balgrist (ethical permission numbers 2016-02665 and 2020-0119 as approved by the institutional review board of the Canton of Zurich).

All experiments were approved by the responsible authorities (Canton Zurich license number ZH104-18 & ZH058-21).

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Human patient microarray metadata.

GEO accession number, patient sex, source tissue, patient age, donor number, and disease state of the isolated tissue ordered by GEO accession number. Samples from sheathed tendons are strikethrough and were excluded from further analysis.

elife-87092-supp1.docx (50.8KB, docx)
MDAR checklist
Source code 1. R code file used for the human microarray analysis.
elife-87092-code1.zip (18.6KB, zip)
Source code 2. ImageJ code file used for the analysis of histological sections from humans.
elife-87092-code2.zip (5.7KB, zip)
Source code 3. R code file used for the analysis of histological sections from humans.
elife-87092-code3.zip (8.1KB, zip)
Source code 4. ImageJ code file used for the analysis of histological sections from assembloids.
elife-87092-code4.zip (5.8KB, zip)
Source code 5. R code file used for the analysis of histological sections from assembloids.
elife-87092-code5.zip (5.9KB, zip)

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE214015. The image and sequencing data analysis code (R and ImageJ) is included in the supporting files (Source code 1–5). Metadata on the human patients is included in the supporting files (Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

The following dataset was generated:

Stauber T, Moschini G, Hussien AA, Jaeger PK, de Bock K, Snedeker JG. 2023. Il-6 signaling exacerbates hallmarks of tendon lesions by stimulating progenitor proliferation & migration to damage. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE214015

The following previously published dataset was used:

Jelinsky SA. 2010. Analysis of Human Tendinopathy Gene Expression. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE26051

References

  1. Andersson G, Backman LJ, Scott A, Lorentzon R, Forsgren S, Danielson P. Substance P accelerates hypercellularity and angiogenesis in tendon tissue and enhances paratendinitis in response to Achilles tendon overuse in a tendinopathy model. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011;45:1017–1022. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.082750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arvind V, Huang AH. Reparative and maladaptive inflammation in tendon healing. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2021;9:719047. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.719047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aström M, Rausing A. Chronic achilles tendinopathy: a survey of surgical and histopathologic findings. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1995;1:151–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bautista CA, Srikumar A, Tichy ED, Qian G, Jiang X, Qin L, Mourkioti F, Dyment NA. CD206+ tendon resident macrophages and their potential crosstalk with fibroblasts and the ECM during tendon growth and maturation. Frontiers in Physiology. 2023;14:1122348. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1122348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Best KT, Korcari A, Mora KE, Nichols AE, Muscat SN, Knapp E, Buckley MR, Loiselle AE. Scleraxis-lineage cell depletion improves tendon healing and disrupts adult tendon homeostasis. eLife. 2021;10:e62203. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blache U, Wunderli SL, Hussien AA, Stauber T, Flückiger G, Bollhalder M, Niederöst B, Fucentese SF, Snedeker JG. Inhibition of ERK 1/2 kinases prevents tendon matrix breakdown. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:6838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85331-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ceafalan LC, Popescu BO, Hinescu ME. Cellular players in skeletal muscle regeneration. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:957014. doi: 10.1155/2014/957014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choy EHS, Isenberg DA, Garrood T, Farrow S, Ioannou Y, Bird H, Cheung N, Williams B, Hazleman B, Price R, Yoshizaki K, Nishimoto N, Kishimoto T, Panayi GS. Therapeutic benefit of blocking interleukin-6 activity with an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2002;46:3143–3150. doi: 10.1002/art.10623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Choy E, Rose-John S. Interleukin-6 as a multifunctional regulator: inflammation, immune response, and fibrosis. Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders. 2017;2:S1–S5. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Choy EH, De Benedetti F, Takeuchi T, Hashizume M, John MR, Kishimoto T. Translating IL-6 biology into effective treatments. Nature Reviews. Rheumatology. 2020;16:335–345. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0419-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colquhoun M, Gulati M, Farah Z, Mouyis M. Clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Medicine. 2022;50:138–142. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2021.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cosgrove BD, Sacco A, Gilbert PM, Blau HM. A home away from home: challenges and opportunities in engineering in vitro muscle satellite cell niches. Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity. 2009;78:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Crowe LAN, Akbar M, de Vos R-J, Kirwan PD, Kjaer M, Pedret C, McInnes IB, Siebert S, Millar NL. Pathways driving tendinopathy and enthesitis: siblings or distant cousins in musculoskeletal medicine? The Lancet. Rheumatology. 2023;5:e293–e304. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Micheli AJ, Swanson JB, Disser NP, Martinez LM, Walker NR, Oliver DJ, Cosgrove BD, Mendias CL. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identifies extensive heterogeneity in the cellular composition of mouse Achilles tendons. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 2020;319:C885–C894. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00372.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dyment NA, Liu CF, Kazemi N, Aschbacher-Smith LE, Kenter K, Breidenbach AP, Shearn JT, Wylie C, Rowe DW, Butler DL. The paratenon contributes to scleraxis-expressing cells during patellar tendon healing. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e59944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dyment NA, Hagiwara Y, Matthews BG, Li Y, Kalajzic I, Rowe DW. Lineage tracing of resident tendon progenitor cells during growth and natural healing. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e96113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002;30:207–210. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Emery P, Keystone E, Tony HP, Cantagrel A, van Vollenhoven R, Sanchez A, Alecock E, Lee J, Kremer J. IL-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab improves treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals: results from a 24-week multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2008;67:1516–1523. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ernst M, Jenkins BJ. Acquiring signalling specificity from the cytokine receptor gp130. Trends in Genetics. 2004;20:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eulenfeld R, Dittrich A, Khouri C, Müller PJ, Mütze B, Wolf A, Schaper F. Interleukin-6 signalling: more than Jaks and STATs. European Journal of Cell Biology. 2012;91:486–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Florit D, Pedret C, Casals M, Malliaras P, Sugimoto D, Rodas G. Incidence of tendinopathy in team sports in a multidisciplinary sports club over 8 seasons. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2019;18:780–788. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Functional Genomics Center Zurich ETHZ | UZH BfabricShiny. 4d4f419GitHub. 2022 https://github.com/fgcz/bfabricShiny
  23. Gelberman RH, Manske PR, Akeson WH, Woo SL, Lundborg G, Amiel D. Flexor tendon repair. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1986;4:119–128. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100040116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gelberman RH, Steinberg D, Amiel D, Akeson W. Fibroblast chemotaxis after tendon repair. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1991;16:686–693. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(91)90195-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harvey T, Flamenco S, Fan CM. A Tppp3+Pdgfra+ tendon stem cell population contributes to regeneration and reveals A shared role for PDGF signalling in regeneration and fibrosis. Nature Cell Biology. 2019;21:1490–1503. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0417-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ho JD, Chung HJ, Ms Barron A, Ho DA, Sahni D, Browning JL, Bhawan J. Extensive cd34-to-cd90 fibroblast transition defines regions of cutaneous reparative, hypertrophic, and keloidal scarring. The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2019;41:16–28. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Howell K, Chien C, Bell R, Laudier D, Tufa SF, Keene DR, Andarawis-Puri N, Huang AH. Novel model of tendon regeneration reveals distinct cell mechanisms underlying regenerative and fibrotic tendon healing. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:45238. doi: 10.1038/srep45238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Järvinen TAH, Kannus P, Maffulli N, Khan KM. Achilles tendon disorders: etiology and epidemiology. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2005;10:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2005.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jelinsky SA, Rodeo SA, Li J, Gulotta LV, Archambault JM, Seeherman HJ. Regulation of gene expression in human tendinopathy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones GC, Corps AN, Pennington CJ, Clark IM, Edwards DR, Bradley MM, Hazleman BL, Riley GP. Expression profiling of metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in normal and degenerate human achilles tendon. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2006;54:832–842. doi: 10.1002/art.21672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kirkendall DT, Garrett WE. Function and biomechanics of tendons. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 1997;7:62–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kistner TM, Pedersen BK, Lieberman DE. Interleukin 6 as an energy allocator in muscle tissue. Nature Metabolism. 2022;4:170–179. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00538-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kopf M, Baumann H, Freer G, Freudenberg M, Lamers M, Kishimoto T, Zinkernagel R, Bluethmann H, Köhler G. Impaired immune and acute-phase responses in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Nature. 1994;368:339–342. doi: 10.1038/368339a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Korcari A, Nichols AEC, Buckley MR, Loiselle AE. Depletion of Scleraxis-Lineage Cells Accelerates Tendon ECM Aging and Promotes Retention of a Specialized Remodeling Tenocyte Population That Drives Enhanced Tendon Healing. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.01.20.477119. [DOI]
  35. Kult S, Olender T, Osterwalder M, Markman S, Leshkowitz D, Krief S, Blecher-Gonen R, Ben-Moshe S, Farack L, Keren-Shaul H, Salame T-M, Capellini TD, Itzkovitz S, Amit I, Visel A, Zelzer E. Bi-fated tendon-to-bone attachment cells are regulated by shared enhancers and KLF transcription factors. eLife. 2021;10:e55361. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Langberg H, Olesen JL, Gemmer C, Kjaer M. Substantial elevation of interleukin-6 concentration in peritendinous tissue, in contrast to muscle, following prolonged exercise in humans. The Journal of Physiology. 2002;542:985–990. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.019141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Legerlotz K, Jones ER, Screen HRC, Riley GP. Increased expression of IL-6 family members in tendon pathology. Rheumatology. 2012;51:1161–1165. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lewinson RT, Vallerand IA, Parsons LM, LaMothe JM, Frolkis AD, Lowerison MW, Kaplan GG, Patten SB, Barnabe C. Psoriasis and the risk of foot and ankle tendinopathy or enthesopathy in the absence of psoriatic arthritis: a population-based study. RMD Open. 2018;4:e000668. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li J, Chen J, Kirsner R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clinics in Dermatology. 2007;25:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li Y, Wu T, Liu S. Identification and distinction of tenocytes and tendon-derived stem cells. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;9:629515. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.629515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Systems. 2015;1:417–425. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin TW, Cardenas L, Glaser DL, Soslowsky LJ, Biomech J. Tendon healing in interleukin-4 and interleukin-6 knockout mice. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006;39:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lipman K, Wang C, Ting K, Soo C, Zheng Z. Tendinopathy: injury, repair, and current exploration. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2018;12:591–603. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S154660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Magnusson SP, Langberg H, Kjaer M. The pathogenesis of tendinopathy: balancing the response to loading. Nature Reviews. Rheumatology. 2010;6:262–268. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. McElvany MD, McGoldrick E, Gee AO, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA. Rotator cuff repair: published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;43:491–500. doi: 10.1177/0363546514529644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. McFarland-Mancini MM, Funk HM, Paluch AM, Zhou M, Giridhar PV, Mercer CA, Kozma SC, Drew AF. Differences in wound healing in mice with deficiency of IL-6 versus IL-6 receptor. The Journal of Immunology. 2010;184:7219–7228. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mendias CL, Gumucio JP, Bakhurin KI, Lynch EB, Brooks SV. Physiological loading of tendons induces scleraxis expression in epitenon fibroblasts. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2012;30:606–612. doi: 10.1002/jor.21550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mienaltowski MJ, Adams SM, Birk DE. Regional differences in stem cell/progenitor cell populations from the mouse achilles tendon. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2013;19:199–210. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mienaltowski MJ, Cánovas A, Fates VA, Hampton AR, Pechanec MY, Islas-Trejo A, Medrano JF. Transcriptome profiles of isolated murine Achilles tendon proper- and peritenon-derived progenitor cells. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2019;37:1409–1418. doi: 10.1002/jor.24076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Millar NL, Silbernagel KG, Thorborg K, Kirwan PD, Galatz LM, Abrams GD, Murrell GAC, McInnes IB, Rodeo SA. Tendinopathy. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2021;7:1. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00234-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Moresi V, Adamo S, Berghella L. The JAK/STAT pathway in skeletal muscle pathophysiology. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019;10:500. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Muñoz-Cánoves P, Scheele C, Pedersen BK, Serrano AL. Interleukin-6 myokine signaling in skeletal muscle: a double-edged sword? The FEBS Journal. 2013;280:4131–4148. doi: 10.1111/febs.12338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nakama K, Gotoh M, Yamada T, Mitsui Y, Yasukawa H, Imaizumi T, Higuchi F, Nagata K. Interleukin-6-induced activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 in ruptured rotator cuff tendon. The Journal of International Medical Research. 2006;34:624–631. doi: 10.1177/147323000603400607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Niu X, Subramanian A, Hwang TH, Schilling TF, Galloway JL. Tendon cell regeneration is mediated by attachment site-resident progenitors and bmp signaling. Current Biology. 2020;30:3277–3292. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Nowell MA, Richards PJ, Horiuchi S, Yamamoto N, Rose-John S, Topley N, Williams AS, Jones SA. Soluble IL-6 receptor governs IL-6 activity in experimental arthritis: blockade of arthritis severity by soluble glycoprotein 130. The Journal of Immunology. 2003;171:3202–3209. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Poutoglidou F, Pourzitaki C, Manthou ME, Samoladas E, Saitis A, Malliou F, Kouvelas D. Infliximab prevents systemic bone loss and suppresses tendon inflammation in a collagen-induced arthritis rat model. Inflammopharmacology. 2021;29:661–672. doi: 10.1007/s10787-021-00815-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rajan N, Habermehl J, Coté MF, Doillon CJ, Mantovani D. Preparation of ready-to-use, storable and reconstituted type I collagen from rat tail tendon for tissue engineering applications. Nature Protocols. 2006;1:2753–2758. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Riley GP, Harrall RL, Constant CR, Chard MD, Cawston TE, Hazleman BL. Tendon degeneration and chronic shoulder pain: changes in the collagen composition of the human rotator cuff tendons in rotator cuff tendinitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1994;53:359–366. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.6.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Riley G. Tendinopathy--from basic science to treatment. Nature Clinical Practice. Rheumatology. 2008;4:82–89. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rose-John S. IL-6 trans-signaling via the soluble IL-6 receptor: importance for the pro-inflammatory activities of IL-6. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;8:1237–1247. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. rstudio Rstudio. 9f796939GitHub. 2022 https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio
  62. Sakabe T, Sakai K, Maeda T, Sunaga A, Furuta N, Schweitzer R, Sasaki T, Sakai T. Transcription factor scleraxis vitally contributes to progenitor lineage direction in wound healing of adult tendon in mice. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2018;293:5766–5780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Serrano AL, Baeza-Raja B, Perdiguero E, Jardí M, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Interleukin-6 is an essential regulator of satellite cell-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Cell Metabolism. 2008;7:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sharma P, Maffulli N. Biology of tendon injury: healing, modeling and remodeling. Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions. 2006;6:181–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Simone C, Giampietruzzi AR, Costantini M, Amerio P. Achilles tendinitis in psoriasis: clinical and sonographic findings. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2003;49:217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Snedeker JG, Foolen J, Biomater A. Tendon injury and repair - a perspective on the basic mechanisms of tendon disease and future clinical therapy. Acta Biomaterialia. 2017;63:18–36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Soslowsky LJ, Thomopoulos S, Tun S, Flanagan CL, Keefer CC, Mastaw J, Carpenter JE. Neer Award 1999: overuse activity injures the supraspinatus tendon in an animal model: a histologic and biomechanical study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2000;9:79–84. doi: 10.1067/mse.2000.101962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Srirangan S, Choy EH. The role of interleukin 6 in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. 2010;2:247–256. doi: 10.1177/1759720X10378372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stauber T, Blache U, Snedeker JG. Tendon tissue microdamage and the limits of intrinsic repair. Matrix Biology. 2020;1:68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stauber T, Wolleb M, Duss A, Jaeger PK, Heggli I, Hussien AA, Blache U, Snedeker JG. Extrinsic macrophages protect while tendon progenitors degrade: insights from a tissue engineered model of tendon compartmental crosstalk. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2021;10:e2100741. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Stauber T, Wolleb M, Snedeker JG. Engineering tendon assembloids to probe cellular crosstalk in disease and repair. Bioengineering. 2024;1:e65987. doi: 10.3791/65987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Su H, Lei CT, Zhang C. Interleukin-6 signaling pathway and its role in kidney disease: an update. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8:405. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. PNAS. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sugg KB. Changes in macrophage phenotype and induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition genes following acute Achilles tenotomy and repair. J Orthop Res. 2014;32:944–951. doi: 10.1002/JOR.22624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tan GK, Pryce BA, Stabio A, Keene DR, Tufa SF, Schweitzer R. Cell autonomous TGFβ signaling is essential for stem/progenitor cell recruitment into degenerative tendons. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16:2942–2957. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2014;6:a016295. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tarafder S, Chen E, Jun Y, Kao K, Sim KH, Back J, Lee FY, Lee CH. Tendon stem/progenitor cells regulate inflammation in tendon healing via JNK and STAT3 signaling. FASEB Journal. 2017;31:3991–3998. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700071R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Villar-Fincheira P, Sanhueza-Olivares F, Norambuena-Soto I, Cancino-Arenas N, Hernandez-Vargas F, Troncoso R, Gabrielli L, Chiong M. Role of interleukin-6 in vascular health and disease. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2021;8:641734. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.641734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wada E, Tanihata J, Iwamura A, Takeda S, Hayashi YK, Matsuda R. Treatment with the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody attenuates muscular dystrophy via promoting skeletal muscle regeneration in dystrophin-/utrophin-deficient mice. Skeletal Muscle. 2017;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s13395-017-0140-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Watanabe S, Mu W, Kahn A, Jing N, Li JH, Lan HY, Nakagawa T, Ohashi R, Johnson RJ. Role of JAK/STAT Pathway in IL-6-induced activation of vascular smooth muscle cells. American Journal of Nephrology. 2004;24:387–392. doi: 10.1159/000079706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Willett TL, Labow RS, Avery NC. Increased Proteolysis of Collagen in an In Vitro Tensile Overload Tendon Model. Springer Nature; 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wunderli SL, Blache U, Beretta Piccoli A, Niederöst B, Holenstein CN, Passini FS, Silván U, Bundgaard L, Auf dem Keller U, Snedeker JG. Tendon response to matrix unloading is determined by the patho-physiological niche. Matrix Biology. 2020;89:11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2019.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yelin E, Weinstein S, King T. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2016;46:259–260. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Yin H, Price F, Rudnicki MA. Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiological Reviews. 2013;93:23–67. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang C, Li Y, Wu Y, Wang L, Wang X, Du J. Interleukin-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway is essential for macrophage infiltration and myoblast proliferation during muscle regeneration. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:1489–1499. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.419788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Valerie Horsley 1

This important study defines signaling mechanisms in tendinopathy development, which is significant as there is a clear need to identify therapeutic targets to prevent or reverse tendon pathology. The evidence supporting the conclusions are compelling combining an existing human tendinopathy transcriptomics dataset with ex-vivo assembloid model, and an in vivo injury model using genetic reporter mice. This work will be of interest to developmental and stem cell biologists.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

This work by Stauber et al., is focused on understanding the signaling mechanisms that are associated with tendinopathy development, and by screening a panel of human tendinopathy samples, identified IL-6/JAK/STAT as a potential mediator of this pathology. Using an innovate explant model they delineated the requirement for IL-6 in the main body of the tendon to alter the dynamics of extrinsic fibroblasts. These studies are complemented by in vivo studies that include a Scx-GFP reporter. This approach facilitates examination of the effects of IL6-/- on Scx+ cells, and the differences observed between ex vivo and in vivo contexts.

The use of a publicly available existing dataset is considered a strength, since this dataset includes expression data from several different human tendons experiencing tendinopathy. The revised analysis that includes only non-sheathed tendons facilitates the identification of potentially conserved regulators of the tendinopathy phenotype, with immunostaining for CD90, IL-6R, and IL-6 expression in human tendinopathy samples providing important validation of the transcriptomic studies.

eLife. 2025 Feb 7;12:RP87092. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87092.3.sa2

Author response

Tino Stauber 1, Greta Moschini 2, Amro A Hussien 3, Patrick Klaus Jaeger 4, Katrien De Bock 5, Jess G Snedeker 6

Author response:

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

eLife assessment:

This important study details an enrichment of the IL-6 signaling pathway in human tendinopathy and applies transcriptional profiling to an advanced in vitro model to test IL-6 specific phenotypes in tendinopathy. Overall, the strength of evidence is solid yet incomplete, as transcriptomic measurements provide clarity, though functional studies including analysis of proliferation are needed to confirm these findings. This work will be of interest to stem cell biologists and immunologists.

To functionally assess the effect of IL-6 on Scx+ fibroblast proliferation in an acute injury, we repeated the in vivo studies with an EdU staining and a newly established IL-6 KO x ScxGFP+ mouse line. We found no evidence for this effect in acute injuries and acknowledge this in the revised manuscript.

We further added data collected by combining fluorescence microscopy with human patient-derived tissue to strengthen the link between IL-6, IL-6R, and proliferation of CD90+ cells in chronic injuries.

See comment 1.1.

See comment 2.4.

Changes:

- Title

- Abstract

- Figure 2 and 3 (new data)

- Figure 7 (new data)

- Results

- Discussion

Reviewer 1

(1.1) First, the experimental approach does not directly assess proliferation, as such the conclusions regarding proliferation are not well supported. In the ex-vivo model, the use of cell counting approaches is somewhat acceptable since the system is constrained by the absence of potential influx of new cells. However, given the nearly unlimited supply of extrinsically derived cells in vivo (vs. the explant model), assessment of actual proliferation (e.g. Edu, BrdU, Ki67) is critical to support this conclusion.

To assess the effect of IL-6 on Scx+ fibroblast proliferation in an acute injury, we repeated the in vivo studies with an EdU staining and a newly established IL-6 KO x ScxGFP+ mouse line to combat the considerable background noise of currently available Scx antibodies.

Under the improved design of these experiments, we could detect no effect of IL-6 on ScxGFP+ cells in an acute injury in vivo. We have therefore replaced figure 5 with the new results in figure 7 and moved figure 5F to the supplementary materials (Supplementary figure 9).

We acknowledge and discuss this in the discussion section.

See comment 2.4.

See comment 2.11.

Changes:

- Title

- Abstract

- Figure 7 (new data)

- Supplementary Figure 9

- Results

- Discussion

(1.2) Second, the justification for the use of Scx-GFP+ cells as a progenitor population is not well supported. Indeed, in the discussion, Scx+ cells are treated as though they are uniformly a progenitor population, when the diversity of this population has been established by the cited studies, which do not suggest that these are progenitor populations. Additional definition/ delineation of these cells to identify the subset of these cells that may actually display other putative progenitor markers would support the conclusions. As it stands, the study currently provides important information on the impact of IL6 on Scx+ cells, but not tendon progenitors.

We further delineated the extrinsic cell populations isolated from mouse Achilles tendons of ScxGFP+ mice using flow cytometric analysis and RT-qPCR. We used tendon population markers suggested by sc-RNA-seq of mouse Achilles tendons.

(De Micheli et al., Am. J. Physiol. - Cell Physiol., 2020, 319(5), DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00372.2020)

While a small subpopulation of these cells expressed typical progenitor markers (i.e. CD45 and CD146), we could detect no overlap with Scx+ cells. As suggested by the reviewer, we therefore replaced occurrences of “progenitor” in the manuscript with “fibroblast” and performed additional experiments with human patient-derived tissue sections and the fibroblast marker CD90.

See comment 2.1.

Changes:

- Title

- Abstract

- Figure 2 (new data)

- Figure 3 (new data)

- Supplementary Figure 6 (new data)

- Results

- Discussion

(1.3) Clarity regarding the relevance of the 'sheath-like' component of the assembloid would provide helpful context regarding which types of tendons are likely to have this type of communication vs. those that do not, and if there are differences in tendinopathy prevalence. Understanding why/how this communication between structures is relevant is important.

Our assembloid concept is inspired by the structure of unsheathed tendons (i.e. biceps, semitendinosus, gracilis) and not sheathed tendons like the flexor tendons.

We agree that clarity regarding the tendon type having this type of communication is important, so we sharpened previously blurry text passages in the revised manuscript.

Text changes:

- Introduction, page 3

- Results, page 4

- Results, page 8

- Results, page 9

- Results, page 11

- Discussion, page 25

- Discussion, page 26

- Experimental section, page 28

- Figure 1

- Figure 2

- Figure 3

- Supplementary Table 1

- Supplementary Figure 3

- Supplementary Figure 4

(1.4) Minor: in the text for Figure 6 (2nd paragraph), the comma in 19,694 is superscripted.

Corrections were made throughout the manuscript.

Text changes:

- Results, page 4

- Results, page 12

- Results, page 19

- Results, page 21

(1.5) Minor: The inclusion of the Scx-GFP mouse should be included in the schematic Figure 5.

The results presented in the previous draft did not feature tissues from ScxGFP mice but used a Scx-antibody to visually detect Scx+ cells. In anticipation of the revision process, we bred a new IL-6 KO x ScxGFP+ mouse line and repeated the experiment. As suggested by the reviewer, the new schematic figure 7 as well as the former figure 5 moved to the supplementary material now includes this mouse.

Figure changes:

- Supplementary Figure 9 (former figure 5)

- Figure 7

Reviewer 2

(2.1) One question that comes to mind is whether the fibroblast progenitors in the extrinsic sheath of Achilles tendon is similar to those surrounding the tail tendon. The similarity of progenitors between different tendons is assumed with this model. I would consider this to be a minor issue.

Tail tendon fascicles are thought to have a low number of reparative fibroblasts / progenitor cells because they lack a developed extrinsic compartment. Achilles tendons are supposed to have a higher number of reparative fibroblasts / progenitor cells, as their fascicles are surrounded by an extrinsic compartment.

To verify this here, we added a better characterization and comparison of the cell populations isolated from the tail tendon fascicles and the Achilles tendons.

First, we added representative light microscopy images of these cells at different timepoints after being cultured on tissue-culture plastic.

Second, we performed flow cytometric analysis not only on the freshly digested tail tendon fascicles and Achilles tendons, but also on the cultured cells at the timepoint when they would have been embedded into the assembloids.

Third, we compared the expression of population-specific markers in cells derived from tail tendon fascicle and Achilles tendons.

As expected, tail tendon fascicle-derived cell populations appeared to be more elongated than Achilles tendon-derived populations shortly after isolation. Similarly, the “maintenance” fibroblasts in healthy tendons are more elongated than the reparative fibroblasts in diseased ones. After culture and priming in tendinopathic niche conditions, both populations assumed a more roundish, reparative phenotype.

This was consistent with the flow cytometric analysis, which revealed a large difference between freshly isolated populations, that disappeared after extended culture and priming in tendinopathic niche conditions. Gene expression in tail tendon fascicle-derived and Achilles tendon-derived cells was similar after extended culture and priming in tendinopathic niche conditions.

See comment 1.2.

See comment 2.10.

Changes:

- Supplementary Figure 6 (new data)

- Results, page 11

(2.2) The authors use core tendons from IL-6 knockout mice and progenitors from wild-type mice. The reasoning behind this approach was a little confusing... is IL-6 expressed solely in the tendon core compared to the extrinsic sheath?

Insights gained from human patient-derived tissues (Figure 2) suggest that in a healthy tendon, most of the IL-6 is located in the extrinsic compartment but distributed over compartments in the tendinopathic ones.

Our assembloid design mimicks this by embedding wildtype fibroblasts into the extrinsic compartment. Our hypothesis was that a wildtype core in tendinopathic niche conditions attracts reparative fibroblasts through IL-6, while an IL-6 knock-out core does not. Therefore, it was important to establish IL-6 gradients close to what they seem to be in vivo.

Nevertheless, we have to acknowledge that the amount of IL-6 secreted by extrinsic fibroblasts in isolation is quite small compared to what is secreted by a wildtype core (Supplementary Figure 7). Attributing IL-6 in the supernatant of a WT core // WT fibroblast assembloid to the correct cell population is challenging but could be part of future research.

Changes:

- Figure 2 (new data)

- Supplementary Figure 7 (new data)

- Results, page 12

(2.3) Is a co-culture system for 7 days appropriate to model tendinopathy without the supplementation of exogenous inflammatory compounds? The transcriptomic differences in Figure 3 seem to be subtle, and may perhaps suggest that it could be a model that more closely resembles steady state compared to tendinopathy. If so, is IL-6 still relevant during steady state?

The collective experience in our lab is that core explants exposed to tendinopathic niche conditions (i.e. serum, 37°C, high oxygen, and high glucose levels) assume a disease-like phenotype. (i.e. Wunderli et al., Matrix Biology, 2020, Volume 89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2019.12.003 and Blache et al., Sci. Rep., 2021, 11(1), DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-85331-1).

Specifically for our core // fibroblast co-culture system, we have reported the emergence of exaggerated tendinopathic hallmarks in a previous publication (Stauber et al., Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2021, 10(20), https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100741).

We clarified the use of previously validated tendinopathic niche conditions in this manuscript.

Changes:

- Introduction, page 3

- Results, page 12

(2.4) The results presented in Figures 4 and 5 are impressive, demonstrating a link between IL-6 and fibroblast progenitor numbers and migration. Their experimental design in these figures show strong evidence, using Tocilizumab and recombinant IL-6 to rescue shown phenotypes. I would reduce the claims on proliferation, however, unless a proliferation-specific marker (e.g., Ki67, BrdU, EdU) is included in confocal analyses of Scx+ progenitors.

As reviewer 1 pointed out as well, it is important to use a proliferation-specific marker “given the nearly unlimited supply of extrinsically derived cells in vivo (vs. the explant model)”.

To assess the effect of IL-6 on Scx+ fibroblast proliferation in vivo, we repeated those experiments with a proliferation-specific EdU staining and a newly established IL-6 KO x ScxGFP+ mouse line.

Under this improved design, we could not detect an effect of IL-6 on proliferation in an acute injury in vivo.

We have therefore replaced figure 5 with the new results in figure 7 and moved figure 5F to the supplementary materials (Supplementary figure 9).

We acknowledge and discuss this in the discussion section and softened our statements in the title and the abstract.

See comment 1.1.

See comment 2.11.

Changes:

- Title

- Abstract

- Figure 7 (new data)

- Supplementary Figure 9

- Results

- Discussion

(2.5) I think it would significantly strengthen the study if they could measure tendon healing in IL-6 knockouts or in wild-type mice treated with IL-6 inhibitors, since conventional ablation of IL-6 may lead to the elevation of compensatory IL-6 superfamily ligands that could activate STAT signaling. The authors claim that reducing IL-6 signaling decreases transcriptomic signatures of tendinopathy, but IL-6 may be necessary to promote normal healing of the tendon following injury. It is supposed that a lack of Scx+ progenitor migration would delay tendon healing.

Indeed, another study using the same IL-6 knock-out strain showed that a lack of IL-6 signaling resulted in slightly inferior mechanical properties in healing patellar tendons (Lin et al., J. Biomech., 39(1), 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.009)

Also, it might be due to the elevation of compensatory IL-6 superfamily ligands that we found no effect of IL-6 on the proliferation of Scx+ cells in an acute injury in vivo.

Therefore, assessing the effects of IL-6 inhibitors on tendon healing following an acute injury would have been of great interest to us. Unfortunately, getting the necessary permission from the animal experimentation office for a new invasive treatment protocol was outside of our scope due to the severity degree and time limitations.

We incorporated and acknowledged these important points in the discussion.

Text changes:

- Introduction, page 3

- Discussion, page 26

(2.6) Do IL-6 knockout mice and/or mice treated with IL-6 inhibitors have delayed healing following Achilles tendon resection? Please provide experimental evidence.

See comment 2.5.

(2.7) I would suggest reducing claims on proliferation, or include a proliferation specific marker (e.g., Ki67, BrdU, EdU) in confocal analyses of Scx+ progenitors.

See comment 1.1.

See comment 2.4.

(2.8) Supplementary Figures 1 and 2: the authors removed outliers. Please specify exactly which outliers were removed in the figures, and provide additional information on the criteria used to identify these outliers.

To address this comment, we sharpened our criteria for identifying outliers and re-did the analysis depicted in figure 1.

Briefly, we excluded 5 normal and 5 tendinopathic samples from sheathed tendons which have a different compartmental structure than unsheathed tendons.

A complete separate analysis of the sheathed tendons would have been beyond the scope of this manuscript, but early screening suggested that IL-6 transcripts are not increased in sheathed tendinopathic tendons.

We made text changes throughout the manuscript and to the supplementary table 1 and supplementary figure 2 to clearly state our criteria for excluding samples / outliers.

Changes:

- Introduction, page 3

- Results, page 4

- Results, page 8

- Results, page 9

- Results, page 11

- Discussion, page 25

- Discussion, page 26

- Experimental section, page 28

- Figure 1,

- Figure 2,

- Figure 3,

- Supplementary table 1,

- Supplementary figure 2,

- Supplementary figure 3,

- Supplementary figure 4,

(2.9) Whenever "positive enrichment" is mentioned in the text, please specify in what group. It is presumed that the enrichment, for example, in the first figure is associated with tendinopathy samples compared to controls, though it is a bit unclear.

The direction of the enrichment was added to the text.

Text changes:

- Abstract, page 1

- Introduction, page 3

- Results, page 4

- Results, page 6

- Results, page 12

- Results, page 14

- Results, page 19

- Results, page 21

- Discussion, page 25

- Discussion, page 26

- Discussion, page 27

- Figure 1

- Figure 5

- Figure 8

- Figure 9

- Supplementary figure 3

- Supplementary figure 4

- Supplementary figure 6

- Supplementary figure 8

- Supplementary figure 11

- Supplementary figure 12

- Supplementary figure 14

(2.10) Are tail tendon progenitors similar to Achilles tendon progenitors? Please provide a statement that shows similarity (in function, transcriptome, etc.) to support the in vitro tendon model.

See comment 1.2.

See comment 2.1.

(2.11) Are the results in Figure 5F significant? It seems that your pictures show a dramatic change in migration, but the quantification does not?

We repeated the in vivo studies with a newly established IL-6 KO x ScxGFP+ mouse line to combat the considerable background noise of currently available Scx antibodies.

Under the improved design of these experiments, we could not detect an effect of IL-6 on ScxGFP+ cells migration in an acute injury in vivo.

We have therefore replaced figure 5 with the new results in figure 7 and moved figure 5F to the supplementary materials (Supplementary figure 9)

We acknowledge and discuss this in the discussion section.

See comment 1.1.

See comment 2.4.

Changes:

- Title

- Abstract

- Figure 7 (new data)

- Supplementary Figure 9

- Results

- Discussion

(2.12) Please provide additional discussion points on cis- versus trans-IL6 signaling in your results found in mouse. Do you think researchers/clinicians would want to target trans-IL6 signaling based on your results? Please support these statements with the expression of IL6R on cells found in the tendon core and external sheath progenitors.

To address this comment, we performed flow cytometric analysis on Achilles tendon-derived fibroblasts expanded in 2D and digested sub-compartments of the assembloids (Supplementary Figure 7).

These data suggest that IL6R is neither expressed by core nor extrinsic fibroblasts, but mainly comes from core-resident CD45+ tenophages.

Human samples co-stained for IL6R and CD68 (an established human macrophage marker) confirmed macrophages as a source of IL-6R in vivo. However, human samples co-stained for IL6R and CD90 (an established marker of reparative fibroblasts in humans) also detected IL6R on CD90+ cells, which have not yet been reported to express IL6R themselves.

Overall, it is likely that trans-IL-6 signaling is more important for the activation of reparative fibroblasts than cis-IL-6 signaling. We added these statements to the manuscript.

Changes:

- Results, page 9

- Results, page 12

- Discussion, page 25

- Discussion, page 26

- Figure 3 (new data)

- Supplementary figure 7 (new data)

(2.13) Please provide more detail on collagen isolation from rat tail in the methods section.

We provided more details on collagen isolation from rat tail in the experimental section (page 29)

Changes:

- Experimental section, page 29

(2.14) Please comment on whether your in vitro system resembles tendinopathy or a steady state tendon. If it models more of a steady state system, would IL-6 still be relevant?

See comment 2.3.

Detailed feedback:

Reviewer 1:

This work by Stauber et al. is focused on understanding the signaling mechanisms that are associated with tendinopathy development, and by screening a panel of human tendinopathy samples, identified IL-6/JAK/STAT as a potential mediator of this pathology. Using an innovative explant model they delineated the requirement for IL-6 in the main body of the tendon to alter the dynamics of cells in the peritendinous synovial sheath space.

The use of a publicly available existing dataset is considered a strength since this dataset includes expression data from several different human tendons experiencing tendinopathy. This facilitates the identification of potentially conserved regulators of the tendinopathy phenotype.

The clear transcriptional shifts between WT and IL6-/- cores demonstrates the utility of the assembloid model, and supports the importance of IL6 in potentiating the cell response to this stimuli.

Reviewer 2:

The authors of this study describe a goal of elucidating the signaling pathways that are upregulated in tendinopathy in order to target these pathways for effective treatments. Their goal is honorable, as tendinopathy is a common debilitating condition with limited treatments. The authors find that IL-6 signaling is upregulated in human tendinopathy samples with transcriptomic and GSEA analyses. The evidence of their initial findings are strong, providing a clinically-relevant phenotype that can be further studied using animal models.

Along these lines, the authors continue with an advanced in vitro system using the mouse tail tendon as the core with progenitors isolated from the Achilles tendon as the external sheath embedded in a hydrogel matrix. One question that comes to mind is whether the fibroblast progenitors in the extrinsic sheath of Achilles tendon is similar to those surrounding the tail tendon. The similarity of progenitors between different tendons is assumed with this model. I would consider this to be a minor issue, and would consider the in vitro system to be an additional strength of this study.

In order to address the IL-6 signaling pathway, the authors use core tendons from IL-6 knockout mice and progenitors from wild-type mice. The reasoning behind this approach was a little confusing... is IL-6 expressed solely in the tendon core compared to the extrinsic sheath? Furthermore, is a co-culture system for 7 days appropriate to model tendinopathy without the supplementation of exogenous inflammatory compounds? The transcriptomic differences in Figure 3 seem to be subtle, and may perhaps suggest that it could be a model that more closely resembles steady state compared to tendinopathy. If so, is IL-6 still relevant during steady state?

Nevertheless, the results presented in Figures 4 and 5 are impressive, demonstrating a link between IL-6 and fibroblast progenitor numbers and migration. Their experimental design in these figures show strong evidence, using Tocilizumab and recombinant IL-6 to rescue shown phenotypes. I would reduce the claims on proliferation, however, unless a proliferation-specific marker (e.g., Ki67, BrdU, EdU) is included in confocal analyses of Scx+ progenitors. The Achilles tendon injury model provides a nice in vivo confirmation of Scx-progenitor migration to the neotendon.

Given their goal to elucidate signaling pathways that could be targeted in the clinic, I think it would significantly strengthen the study if they could measure tendon healing in IL-6 knockouts or in wild-type mice treated with IL-6 inhibitors, since conventional ablation of IL-6 may lead to the elevation of compensatory IL-6 superfamily ligands that could activate STAT signaling. The authors claim that reducing IL-6 signaling decreases transcriptomic signatures of tendinopathy, but IL-6 may be necessary to promote normal healing of the tendon following injury. It is supposed that a lack of Scx+ progenitor migration would delay tendon healing.

Overall, the authors of this study elucidated IL-6 signaling in tendinopathy and provided a strong level of evidence to support their conclusions at the transcriptomic level. However, functional studies are needed to confirm these phenotypes and fully support their aims and conclusions. With these additional studies, this work has the potential to significantly influence treatments for those suffering from tendinopathy.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Stauber T, Moschini G, Hussien AA, Jaeger PK, de Bock K, Snedeker JG. 2023. Il-6 signaling exacerbates hallmarks of tendon lesions by stimulating progenitor proliferation & migration to damage. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE214015
    2. Jelinsky SA. 2010. Analysis of Human Tendinopathy Gene Expression. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE26051

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary file 1. Human patient microarray metadata.

    GEO accession number, patient sex, source tissue, patient age, donor number, and disease state of the isolated tissue ordered by GEO accession number. Samples from sheathed tendons are strikethrough and were excluded from further analysis.

    elife-87092-supp1.docx (50.8KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist
    Source code 1. R code file used for the human microarray analysis.
    elife-87092-code1.zip (18.6KB, zip)
    Source code 2. ImageJ code file used for the analysis of histological sections from humans.
    elife-87092-code2.zip (5.7KB, zip)
    Source code 3. R code file used for the analysis of histological sections from humans.
    elife-87092-code3.zip (8.1KB, zip)
    Source code 4. ImageJ code file used for the analysis of histological sections from assembloids.
    elife-87092-code4.zip (5.8KB, zip)
    Source code 5. R code file used for the analysis of histological sections from assembloids.
    elife-87092-code5.zip (5.9KB, zip)

    Data Availability Statement

    Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE214015. The image and sequencing data analysis code (R and ImageJ) is included in the supporting files (Source code 1–5). Metadata on the human patients is included in the supporting files (Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

    The following dataset was generated:

    Stauber T, Moschini G, Hussien AA, Jaeger PK, de Bock K, Snedeker JG. 2023. Il-6 signaling exacerbates hallmarks of tendon lesions by stimulating progenitor proliferation & migration to damage. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE214015

    The following previously published dataset was used:

    Jelinsky SA. 2010. Analysis of Human Tendinopathy Gene Expression. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE26051


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES