Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Jan 11;17(1):e77283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77283

Giant Cell Arteritis and the Use of Ultrasound in Its Diagnosis

Hridya Harimohan 1,, Rohini Bilagi 2,1, Quynh Huynh 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11809672  PMID: 39931599

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis is a form of vasculitis causing inflammation of large and medium-sized arteries, including the aorta and its major branches and the temporal artery. Temporal artery biopsy can confirm the diagnosis and should be performed as soon as possible after referral but should not interfere with the initiation of glucocorticoid therapy. A biopsy is typically performed within one week of starting glucocorticoids. However, false negatives may occur due to the segmental nature of giant cell arteritis, inadequate vessel length, or inadequate interpretation. A 60-year-old male with a past medical history of type II diabetes mellitus presented with a headache for the past three days. He did not report any worsening of vision. Physical examination was significant for prominent bilateral temporal arteries and bilateral shoulder, arm, and hip tenderness. Carotid artery duplex ultrasound showed less than 50% stenoses of the internal carotid arteries bilaterally. The patient reported improvement of symptoms, including headache and shoulder and hip pain following steroids. The patient was also continued on prednisone 20 mg and started on tocilizumab 162 mg once weekly. This case report highlights the significance of a duplex ultrasound of carotid arteries as an effective alternative to temporal artery biopsy. Duplex ultrasound is a more sensitive, non-invasive, and cost-effective test and could be considered as an aid in diagnosis.

Keywords: colored flow doppler ultrasound, giant cell arteritis (gca), halo, large vessel vasculitis, large vessel vasculitis

Introduction

Giant cell arteritis is a chronic systemic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, including the aorta and its major branches and the temporal artery, and is the most common form of systemic vasculitis affecting mostly women more than 50 years old [1]. It is more common among people of Northern European descent. Temporal arteritis is a medical emergency due to the risk of sudden blindness [2]. Forty percent to 60% of patients with giant cell arteritis have polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms while 10% of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica will develop giant cell arteritis [3]. Temporal artery biopsy can confirm the diagnosis and should be performed as soon as possible after referral but should not interfere with the initiation of glucocorticoid therapy. A biopsy is typically performed within one week of starting glucocorticoids; however, a biopsy may demonstrate positive results for two to six weeks after glucocorticoid therapy is initiated [4].

This case report was presented as a poster in the Clinical Congress of Rheumatology, West, 2024.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old male with a past medical history of type II diabetes mellitus presented with a headache for the past three days. He presented with a stabbing type of headache in the bilateral frontal, temporal, and posterior infra-occipital regions, worse in the right temporal area. The pain was constant in nature, moderate to severe in intensity, and aggravated while moving the jaw, with minimal improvement to over-the-counter analgesics. He denied any aura prior to the headache, associated nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or phonophobia.

He did not report any visual disturbances. The patient also reported muscle pain and stiffness, particularly in the neck, shoulders, upper arms, and hips, bilaterally, worse at night when he rested. Vitals were stable, with a blood pressure of 110/65 mmHg. His pulse rate was 82 beats per minute, respiratory rate was 16 per minute, and temperature was 36.1 °C. Physical examination was significant for prominent and tender bilateral temporal arteries. Bilateral shoulder, arm, and hip tenderness were also present. Laboratory markers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Laboratory markers.

Laboratory Markers (Unit) Value Reference Range
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (mm/hour)  49 Less than 20
C-Reactive Protein (mg/dl) 0.56 Less than 0.9
Anti-Nuclear Antibody Titer 1:80 Less than 1:40
Anti-Nuclear Antibody Pattern Nuclear dense pattern NA

A clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis associated with polymyalgia rheumatica was made. The patient was started on prednisone 20 mg three times daily. MRI brain without contrast showed no evidence of infarction, bleed, or mass. CT head without contrast was unremarkable without acute infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subdural hematoma. A carotid artery duplex ultrasound was done.

Carotid artery duplex ultrasound showed less than 50% stenoses of the internal carotid arteries bilaterally. A halo sign (Figure 1) was noted along the course of the right temporal artery consistent with giant cell vasculitis. The patient reported improvement of symptoms, including headache and shoulder and hip pain following steroids. The patient was also continued on prednisone with a plan to start on tocilizumab 162 mg once weekly for optimal glucose control because of the past medical history of diabetes mellitus.

Figure 1. Halo sign seen in the distal temporal artery (marked) in the carotid artery duplex ultrasound.

Figure 1

Discussion

Once giant cell arteritis is suspected, it is essential to start the patient on steroids before confirming the diagnosis with a temporal artery biopsy [4,5]. Biopsy when performed within one week of starting glucocorticoids ideally shows positive results. However, false-negative results, ranging from 9% to 61%, may occur due to the segmental nature of giant cell arteritis, inadequate vessel length, or inadequate interpretation [5,6]. Duplex ultrasound is a more sensitive, non-invasive, and cost-effective test and could be considered as an aid in diagnosis. Studies have shown that several European rheumatology centers have equipped themselves with fast-track giant cell arteritis clinics, which consist of same-day ultrasound and initiation of treatment with the relative risk of permanent blindness in the giant cell arteritis patients diagnosed through the fast-track clinic, 88% lower compared to those diagnosed by the conventional route via biopsy with a shorter mean duration of inpatient care by 3 days [7,8].

Conclusions

This case report highlights the significance of duplex ultrasound of carotid arteries as an effective alternative to temporal artery biopsy. The availability of temporal artery biopsy in a timely manner after the initiation of steroids is questionable, especially in resource-limited settings. Also, it is extremely essential to have a prompt diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, as it would aid in the necessity of long-term steroids or immunosuppressants as clinically important. Hence, because of the risks of false-negative results in the biopsy of temporal arteries, duplex ultrasound is an effective alternative.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Hridya Harimohan, Rohini Bilagi, Quynh Huynh

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Hridya Harimohan, Rohini Bilagi, Quynh Huynh

Drafting of the manuscript:  Hridya Harimohan, Rohini Bilagi, Quynh Huynh

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Hridya Harimohan, Rohini Bilagi, Quynh Huynh

Supervision:  Quynh Huynh

References

  • 1.Giant cell arteritis. Pepper K. Postgrad Med. 2023;135:22–32. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2023.2190288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Giant cell arteritis (GCA): pathogenesis, clinical aspects and treatment approaches. Ciofalo A, Gulotta G, Iannella G, et al. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2019;15:259–268. doi: 10.2174/1573397115666190227194014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis. Ness T, Bley TA, Schmidt WA, Lamprecht P. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110:376–385. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giant cell arteritis: a review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment. Borchers AT, Gershwin ME. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11:0–54. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giant cell arteritis. Hoffman GS. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:0–80. doi: 10.7326/AITC201611010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:19–30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Large vessel giant cell arteritis. van der Geest KSM, Sandovici M, Bley TA, Stone JR, Slart RHJA, Brouwer E. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024;6:0–408. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00300-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Monitoring giant cell arteritis with ultrasound. Schmidt WA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023;62:2948–2950. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES