Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1997 Aug;73(2):938–951. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78126-8

Mechanical components of motor enzyme function.

C J Brokaw 1
PMCID: PMC1180990  PMID: 9251810

Abstract

Motor enzymes use energy from ATP dephosphorylation to generate movement by a mechanical cycle, moving and pushing in one direction while attached to their cytoskeletal substrate, and recovering by moving relative to their substrate to a new attachment site. Mainstream models assert that movement while attached to the substrate results from preexisting strain in the attached motor. The additional underlying ideas can be described in terms of three components for strain amplification: a rotating lever arm, multiple attached states, and elastic compliance. These components determine how energy is recovered during the mechanical cycle and stored in a strained motor. They may coexist in a real motor; the challenge is to determine the contributions of each component. Because these components can generate similar relationships between strain energy and strain, standard measurements of motor function do not discriminate easily between these components. However, important information could be is provided by observations that suggest weak coupling between chemical and mechanical cycles, observations of negative force and movement events in single motor experiments, and the discovery that two motors that move in opposite directions have very similar structures. In models incorporating changes in conformation between attached states, these observations are only explained easily if the conformational changes are tightly coupled to changes in the strength of motor-substrate binding.

Full text

PDF
938

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnal I., Metoz F., DeBonis S., Wade R. H. Three-dimensional structure of functional motor proteins on microtubules. Curr Biol. 1996 Oct 1;6(10):1265–1270. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)70712-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Astumian R. D., Bier M. Mechanochemical coupling of the motion of molecular motors to ATP hydrolysis. Biophys J. 1996 Feb;70(2):637–653. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79605-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block S. M. Fifty ways to love your lever: myosin motors. Cell. 1996 Oct 18;87(2):151–157. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81332-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brokaw C. J. Weakly-coupled models for motor enzyme function. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1995 Jun;16(3):197–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00121129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooke R., Bialek W. Contraction of glycerinated muscle fibers as a function of the ATP concentration. Biophys J. 1979 Nov;28(2):241–258. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85174-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooke R., White H., Pate E. A model of the release of myosin heads from actin in rapidly contracting muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1994 Mar;66(3 Pt 1):778–788. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80854-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crevel I. M., Lockhart A., Cross R. A. Weak and strong states of kinesin and ncd. J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 22;257(1):66–76. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Córdova N. J., Ermentrout B., Oster G. F. Dynamics of single-motor molecules: the thermal ratchet model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):339–343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duke T., Leibler S. Motor protein mechanics: a stochastic model with minimal mechanochemical coupling. Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1235–1247. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79323-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Díaz Baños F. G., Bordas J., Lowy J., Svensson A. Small segmental rearrangements in the myosin head can explain force generation in muscle. Biophys J. 1996 Aug;71(2):576–589. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79292-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L. A cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1978;33(1):55–82. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(79)90025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L. Muscle contraction and free energy transduction in biological systems. Science. 1985 Mar 1;227(4690):999–1006. doi: 10.1126/science.3156404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Finer J. T., Simmons R. M., Spudich J. A. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature. 1994 Mar 10;368(6467):113–119. doi: 10.1038/368113a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guilford W. H., Dupuis D. E., Kennedy G., Wu J., Patlak J. B., Warshaw D. M. Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar unitary forces and displacements in the laser trap. Biophys J. 1997 Mar;72(3):1006–1021. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78753-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hackney D. D. The kinetic cycles of myosin, kinesin, and dynein. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:731–750. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.003503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Higuchi H., Yanagida T., Goldman Y. E. Compliance of thin filaments in skinned fibers of rabbit skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):1000–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79975-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill T. L. Theoretical formalism for the sliding filament model of contraction of striated muscle. Part I. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:267–340. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill T. L. Theoretical formalism for the sliding filament model of contraction of striated muscle. Part II. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1975;29(2):105–159. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(76)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirose K., Lockhart A., Cross R. A., Amos L. A. Three-dimensional cryoelectron microscopy of dimeric kinesin and ncd motor domains on microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9539–9544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoenger A., Milligan R. A. Motor domains of kinesin and ncd interact with microtubule protofilaments with the same binding geometry. J Mol Biol. 1997 Feb 7;265(5):553–564. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmes K. C. Muscle proteins--their actions and interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996 Dec;6(6):781–789. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J., Vale R. D. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature. 1989 Nov 9;342(6246):154–158. doi: 10.1038/342154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Huxley H. E., Stewart A., Sosa H., Irving T. X-ray diffraction measurements of the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments in contracting muscle. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2411–2421. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80728-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Irving M., St Claire Allen T., Sabido-David C., Craik J. S., Brandmeier B., Kendrick-Jones J., Corrie J. E., Trentham D. R., Goldman Y. E. Tilting of the light-chain region of myosin during step length changes and active force generation in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):688–691. doi: 10.1038/375688a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ishijima A., Kojima H., Higuchi H., Harada Y., Funatsu T., Yanagida T. Multiple- and single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor by nanometer-piconewton manipulation with a microneedle: unitary steps and forces. Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):383–400. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79582-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krupka R. M. Force generation, work, and coupling in molecular motors. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1863–1871. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79751-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lockhart A., Cross R. A. Origins of reversed directionality in the ncd molecular motor. EMBO J. 1994 Feb 15;13(4):751–757. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06317.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mijailovich S. M., Fredberg J. J., Butler J. P. On the theory of muscle contraction: filament extensibility and the development of isometric force and stiffness. Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1475–1484. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79348-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Milligan R. A. Protein-protein interactions in the rigor actomyosin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):21–26. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Molloy J. E., Burns J. E., Kendrick-Jones J., Tregear R. T., White D. C. Movement and force produced by a single myosin head. Nature. 1995 Nov 9;378(6553):209–212. doi: 10.1038/378209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Molloy J. E., Burns J. E., Sparrow J. C., Tregear R. T., Kendrick-Jones J., White D. C. Single-molecule mechanics of heavy meromyosin and S1 interacting with rabbit or Drosophila actins using optical tweezers. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4 Suppl):298S–305S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moss A. G., Gatti J. L., Witman G. B. The motile beta/IC1 subunit of sea urchin sperm outer arm dynein does not form a rigor bond. J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;118(5):1177–1188. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.5.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moy V. T., Florin E. L., Gaub H. E. Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):257–259. doi: 10.1126/science.7939660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nishizaka T., Miyata H., Yoshikawa H., Ishiwata S., Kinosita K., Jr Unbinding force of a single motor molecule of muscle measured using optical tweezers. Nature. 1995 Sep 21;377(6546):251–254. doi: 10.1038/377251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Peskin C. S., Odell G. M., Oster G. F. Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations: the Brownian ratchet. Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):316–324. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81035-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rayment I., Smith C., Yount R. G. The active site of myosin. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:671–702. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.003323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ruppel K. M., Spudich J. A. Structure-function analysis of the motor domain of myosin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:543–573. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sablin E. P., Kull F. J., Cooke R., Vale R. D., Fletterick R. J. Crystal structure of the motor domain of the kinesin-related motor ncd. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):555–559. doi: 10.1038/380555a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sale W. S., Fox L. A. Isolated beta-heavy chain subunit of dynein translocates microtubules in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;107(5):1793–1797. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.5.1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schoenberg M. Equilibrium muscle cross-bridge behavior. Theoretical considerations. Biophys J. 1985 Sep;48(3):467–475. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83802-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schutt C. E., Lindberg U. Actin as the generator of tension during muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):319–323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith D. A., Geeves M. A. Strain-dependent cross-bridge cycle for muscle. II. Steady-state behavior. Biophys J. 1995 Aug;69(2):538–552. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79927-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith D. A., Geeves M. A. Strain-dependent cross-bridge cycle for muscle. Biophys J. 1995 Aug;69(2):524–537. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79926-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tawada K., Sekimoto K. Protein friction exerted by motor enzymes through a weak-binding interaction. J Theor Biol. 1991 May 21;150(2):193–200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80331-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vale R. D., Funatsu T., Pierce D. W., Romberg L., Harada Y., Yanagida T. Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules. Nature. 1996 Apr 4;380(6573):451–453. doi: 10.1038/380451a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vale R. D., Oosawa F. Protein motors and Maxwell's demons: does mechanochemical transduction involve a thermal ratchet? Adv Biophys. 1990;26:97–134. doi: 10.1016/0065-227x(90)90009-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES