Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1997 Nov;73(5):2489–2502. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78277-8

Proton conduction in gramicidin A and in its dioxolane-linked dimer in different lipid bilayers.

S Cukierman 1, E P Quigley 1, D S Crumrine 1
PMCID: PMC1181150  PMID: 9370442

Abstract

Gramicidin A (gA) molecules were covalently linked with a dioxolane ring. Dioxolane-linked gA dimers formed ion channels, selective for monovalent cations, in planar lipid bilayers. The main goal of this study was to compare the functional single ion channel properties of natural gA and its covalently linked dimer in two different lipid bilayers and HCl concentrations (10-8000 mM). Two ion channels with different gating and conductance properties were identified in bilayers from the product of dimerization reaction. The most commonly observed and most stable gramicidin A dimer is the main object of this study. This gramicidin dimer remained in the open state most of the time, with brief closing flickers (tau(closed) approximately 30 micros). The frequency of closing flickers increased with transmembrane potential, making the mean open time moderately voltage dependent (tau(open) changed approximately 1.43-fold/100 mV). Such gating behavior is markedly different from what is seen in natural gA channels. In PEPC (phosphatidylethanolamine-phosphatidylcholine) bilayers, single-channel current-voltage relationships had an ohmic behavior at low voltages, and a marked sublinearity at relatively higher voltages. This behavior contrasts with what was previously described in GMO (glycerylmonooleate) bilayers. In PEPC bilayers, the linear conductance of single-channel proton currents at different proton concentrations was essentially the same for both natural and gA dimers. g(max) and K(D), obtained from fitting experimental points to a Langmuir adsorption isotherm, were approximately 1500 pS and 300 mM, respectively, for both the natural gA and its dimer. In GMO bilayers, however, proton affinities of gA and the dioxolane-dimer were significantly lower (K(D) of approximately 1 and 1.5 M, respectively), and the g(max) higher (approximately 1750 and 2150 pS, respectively) than in PEPC bilayers. Furthermore, the relationship between single-channel conductance and proton concentration was linear at low bulk concentrations of H+ (0.01-2 M) and saturated at concentrations of more than 3 M. It is concluded that 1) The mobility of protons in gramicidin A channels in different lipid bilayers is remarkably similar to proton mobilities in aqueous solutions. In particular, at high concentrations of HCl, proton mobilities in gramicidin A channel and in solution differ by only 25%. 2) Differences between proton conductances in gramicidin A channels in GMO and PEPC cannot be explained by surface charge effects on PEPC membranes. It is proposed that protonated phospholipids adjacent to the mouth of the pore act as an additional source of protons for conduction through gA channels in relation to GMO bilayers. 3) Some experimental results cannot be reconciled with simple alterations in access resistance to proton flow in gA channels. Said differences could be explained if the structure and/or dynamics of water molecules inside gramicidin A channels is modulated by the lipid environment and by modifications in the structure of gA channels. 4) The dioxolane ring is probably responsible for the closing flickers seen in the dimer channel. However, other factors can also influence closing flickers.

Full text

PDF
2489

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akeson M., Deamer D. W. Proton conductance by the gramicidin water wire. Model for proton conductance in the F1F0 ATPases? Biophys J. 1991 Jul;60(1):101–109. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82034-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen O. S. Gramicidin channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 1984;46:531–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.46.030184.002531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Interfacial polarization effects on single-channel current measurements. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):135–146. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84415-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Single-channel measurements at very high potentials. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):119–133. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84414-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Studies on the diffusion-controlled association step. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):147–165. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84416-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen O. S., Koeppe R. E., 2nd Molecular determinants of channel function. Physiol Rev. 1992 Oct;72(4 Suppl):S89–158. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.suppl_4.S89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arseniev A. S., Barsukov I. L., Bystrov V. F., Lomize A. L., Ovchinnikov YuA 1H-NMR study of gramicidin A transmembrane ion channel. Head-to-head right-handed, single-stranded helices. FEBS Lett. 1985 Jul 8;186(2):168–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(85)80702-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bamberg E., Janko K. The action of a carbonsuboxide dimerized gramicidin A on lipid bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Mar 17;465(3):486–499. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90267-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Busath D. D. The use of physical methods in determining gramicidin channel structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol. 1993;55:473–501. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Busath D., Szabo G. Gramicidin forms multi-state rectifying channels. Nature. 1981 Nov 26;294(5839):371–373. doi: 10.1038/294371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crouzy S., Woolf T. B., Roux B. A molecular dynamics study of gating in dioxolane-linked gramicidin A channels. Biophys J. 1994 Oct;67(4):1370–1386. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80618-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cukierman S. Asymmetric electrostatic effects on the gating of rat brain sodium channels in planar lipid membranes. Biophys J. 1991 Oct;60(4):845–855. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82118-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cukierman S. Barium modulates the gating of batrachotoxin-treated Na+ channels in high ionic strength solutions. Biophys J. 1993 Sep;65(3):1168–1173. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81151-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeCoursey T. E., Cherny V. V. Deuterium isotope effects on permeation and gating of proton channels in rat alveolar epithelium. J Gen Physiol. 1997 Apr;109(4):415–434. doi: 10.1085/jgp.109.4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DeCoursey T. E., Cherny V. V. Voltage-activated hydrogen ion currents. J Membr Biol. 1994 Sep;141(3):203–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00235130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Deamer D. W., Nichols J. W. Proton flux mechanisms in model and biological membranes. J Membr Biol. 1989 Feb;107(2):91–103. doi: 10.1007/BF01871715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Decker E. R., Levitt D. G. Use of weak acids to determine the bulk diffusion limitation of H+ ion conductance through the gramicidin channel. Biophys J. 1988 Jan;53(1):25–32. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83062-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finkelstein A., Andersen O. S. The gramicidin A channel: a review of its permeability characteristics with special reference to the single-file aspect of transport. J Membr Biol. 1981 Apr 30;59(3):155–171. doi: 10.1007/BF01875422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Finkelstein A. Weak-acid uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation. Mechanism of action on thin lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970 Apr 7;205(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(70)90055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heberle J., Riesle J., Thiedemann G., Oesterhelt D., Dencher N. A. Proton migration along the membrane surface and retarded surface to bulk transfer. Nature. 1994 Aug 4;370(6488):379–382. doi: 10.1038/370379a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hladky S. B., Haydon D. A. Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. I. Studies of the unit conductance channel. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Aug 9;274(2):294–312. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Junge W. Protons, the thylakoid membrane, and the chloroplast ATP synthase. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;574:268–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb25164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ketchem R. R., Hu W., Cross T. A. High-resolution conformation of gramicidin A in a lipid bilayer by solid-state NMR. Science. 1993 Sep 10;261(5127):1457–1460. doi: 10.1126/science.7690158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koeppe R. E., 2nd, Anderson O. S. Engineering the gramicidin channel. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1996;25:231–258. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.25.060196.001311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levitt D. G., Decker E. R. Electrostatic radius of the gramicidin channel determined from voltage dependence of H+ ion conductance. Biophys J. 1988 Jan;53(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83063-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Levitt D. G., Elias S. R., Hautman J. M. Number of water molecules coupled to the transport of sodium, potassium and hydrogen ions via gramicidin, nonactin or valinomycin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Sep 22;512(2):436–451. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(78)90266-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Läuger P. Diffusion-limited ion flow through pores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Dec 2;455(2):493–509. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90320-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Myers V. B., Haydon D. A. Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. II. The ion selectivity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Aug 9;274(2):313–322. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nagle J. F., Morowitz H. J. Molecular mechanisms for proton transport in membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):298–302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nagle J. F., Tristram-Nagle S. Hydrogen bonded chain mechanisms for proton conduction and proton pumping. J Membr Biol. 1983;74(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/BF01870590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neher E., Eibl H. The influence of phospholipid polar groups on gramicidin channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Jan 4;464(1):37–44. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90368-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oiki S., Koeppe R. E., 2nd, Andersen O. S. Voltage-dependent gating of an asymmetric gramicidin channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):2121–2125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Paula S., Volkov A. G., Van Hoek A. N., Haines T. H., Deamer D. W. Permeation of protons, potassium ions, and small polar molecules through phospholipid bilayers as a function of membrane thickness. Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):339–348. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79575-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pomès R., Roux B. Structure and dynamics of a proton wire: a theoretical study of H+ translocation along the single-file water chain in the gramicidin A channel. Biophys J. 1996 Jul;71(1):19–39. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79211-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Prabhananda B. S., Kombrabail M. H. Two mechanisms of H+/OH- transport across phospholipid vesicular membrane facilitated by gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1996 Dec;71(6):3091–3097. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79503-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ring A. Brief closures of gramicidin A channels in lipid bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Apr 25;856(3):646–653. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(86)90160-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rosenberg P. A., Finkelstein A. Interaction of ions and water in gramicidin A channels: streaming potentials across lipid bilayer membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Sep;72(3):327–340. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.3.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. SARGES R., WITKOP B. GRAMICIDIN A. V. THE STRUCTURE OF VALINE- AND ISOLEUCINE-GRAMICIDIN A. J Am Chem Soc. 1965 May 5;87:2011–2020. doi: 10.1021/ja01087a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sigworth F. J., Urry D. W., Prasad K. U. Open channel noise. III. High-resolution recordings show rapid current fluctuations in gramicidin A and four chemical analogues. Biophys J. 1987 Dec;52(6):1055–1064. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83299-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Stankovic C. J., Heinemann S. H., Delfino J. M., Sigworth F. J., Schreiber S. L. Transmembrane channels based on tartaric acid-gramicidin A hybrids. Science. 1989 May 19;244(4906):813–817. doi: 10.1126/science.2471263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Teissié J., Prats M., Soucaille P., Tocanne J. F. Evidence for conduction of protons along the interface between water and a polar lipid monolayer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(10):3217–3221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Urry D. W., Goodall M. C., Glickson J. D., Mayers D. F. The gramicidin A transmembrane channel: characteristics of head-to-head dimerized (L,D) helices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1907–1911. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Urry D. W. The gramicidin A transmembrane channel: a proposed pi(L,D) helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Mar;68(3):672–676. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.3.672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wallace B. A. Gramicidin channels and pores. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:127–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES