Abstract
Background
Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) by using sensitive and specific biomarkers is considered necessary. MiRNAs are master regulators of gene expression and several biological processes, and they are dysregulated in various cancers, where they play a vital role in either cancer progression or suppression. So, this study was designed to investigate the role of plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p expression as possible diagnostic markers in PC patients as compared to serum CA19-9. In addition, the correlation of those miRNAs and CA19-9 with clinical characteristics of PC patients was analyzed.
Methods
The expression levels of selected miRNAs and serum CA19-9 concentration were determined for 35 patients with PDAC and 15 healthy controls by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and electro-chemiluminescence immune assay, respectively. The sensitivities of miRNAs as biomarkers of PC were evaluated and compared with CA19-9 using a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Results
The levels of three miRNAs (miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p) and CA19-9 were significantly higher in PC patients, even those with early-stage disease (IB and IIB), than in healthy control. Both miRNAs and CA19-9 were associated with tumor stage. The high sensitivities of the three selected miRNAs and CA19-9 were observed.
Conclusion
The measurement of miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p may prove to have clinical utility in diagnosis of PC. Those miRNAs are ideal early biomarkers for PC diagnosis. So, they can effectively be used with serum CA19-9 for PC screening in early tumor stage.
Keywords: Pancreatic cancer, miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-885-5p, CA19-9 and real-time RTPCR
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents the 10th most frequent diagnosed malignancy in the world and recognized as 4th leading cause of deaths due to cancer with a 5-year survival rate of only 6 % (Rachagania et al. 2015). The most common type of PC is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that arises from the exocrine pancreas and represents about 95 % of pancreatic cancers and threats about 1.5 % of men and women life (Becker et al. 2014; Chitkara et al. 2015). The majority of patients present late with locally advanced or distant metastatic disease, making surgical resection impossible. Also, the lack of early diagnostic and prognostic markers for PC makes pancreatic carcinoma a lethal disease with high mortality and poor prognosis. So, novel trustful biomarkers are urgently needed to detect this disease at an early stage (Rachagania et al. 2015). Among these biomarkers, microRNAs (miRNAs) become an attractive focus of research.
MiRNAs are a family of short, noncoding endogenous single RNA molecules (19–24 nucleotides) that regulate the gene expression at posttranscriptional level through binding to the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of specific mRNA causing inhibition of translation or mRNA degradation depending on the degree of complementarily between miRNA and its target mRNA (Negrini et al. 2007; Abue et al. 2015).
MiRNAs are involved in different biological processes and pathways, for example cell proliferation, metabolism, differentiation, apoptosis, and tissue morphogenesis. On the other hand, miRNAs were found to be having altered expression in a variety of diseases including cancer (Yu et al. 2011). Where they play a vital role in either cancer progression or suppression (Zhang et al. 2007). The aberrant expression of miRNAs may function either as oncogenic miRNAs (oncomiRs) or tumor suppressor miRNAs (TSmiRs), and they appear to play necessary roles in the initiation, progression and metastasis in PDAC (Hawa et al. 2016).
MiRNAs have high stability in tissues and fluids, small size, abundance, tissues specificity (Yu et al. 2011), can be measured in very low quantities of material (Gayral et al. 2014), are located in fragile chromosomal regions that affected in various human cancers (Zhang et al. 2011), and moreover, their expression profiling signature can distinguish cancer from benign tissues (Nelson and Weiss 2008), so that miRNAs can be used as biomarkers to detect and monitor the cancer (Yu et al. 2011).
MiR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p are among those miRNAs which reveal differential expression in pancreatic cancer. MiR-22-3p is located at a fragile cancer-relevant genomic region in chromosome 17 (17p13.3) (Gurha et al. 2012), close to p53. MiRNA-22-3p might induce complex changes and extensive cooperation with p53 (Calin et al. 2004). MiR-22-3p plays essential roles in various types of cancer, such as breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer and gastric cancer (Xiong et al. 2010; Yamakuchi et al. 2011; Ling et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2013). MiR-642 is located on chromosome 19 and has two members miR-642a and miR-642b. The sequences of miR-642 members are certainly similar and only diverge by one base in their 3′end. Actually, miR-642b is positioned on the opposite strand to miR-642a. MiR-642b-3p is found to be over expressed in several types of diseases as adipogenesis (Zaragosi et al. 2011), ovarian cancer (Kumar et al. 2011) and human dermal papilla cells (Bae et al. 2014). MiR-885-5p is positioned in the 3p25.3 genomic region, and it has been shown to be a possible serum marker for liver pathologies including, liver cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C virus and hepatocellular carcinoma (Tian et al. 2012).
So, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p expression as possible diagnostic tumor markers in PC patients as compared to serum CA19-9. In addition, the correlation of miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3P, miR-885-5p and CA19-9 with clinical characteristics was analyzed.
Subject and methods
The present study was carried out on 50 participants. Fifteen healthy participants with no family history of pancreatic cancer, (age range, 25–58 years) and 35 patients with PC (age range, 35–75 years) were selected from those admitted to Experimental and Clinical Surgery Department, Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University, from 2014 to 2015.
Patients who had prior pancreatic cancer surgery, or other concomitant cancers, or a history of HIV infection, were excluded from the study. All patients were subjected to full medical history taking and routine laboratory investigation including: complete blood picture and liver function tests.
Patients were diagnosed by abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan (pancreatic-protocol) for disease staging (n = 33 early clinical stage and n = 2 advanced clinical stage). All patients had X-ray and/or CT chest. Cytological diagnosis was performed to all patients with CT-guided fine-needle aspiration (All of them had PDAC).
Patients with early clinical stage (IB and IIB) were referred for surgical decision, while those with late stage were referred for endoscopic drainage. Whipple operation was performed for 5 patients, distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for 3 patients and bypass surgeries in the form of hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis without resection of the primary tumor for 12 patients. Endoscopic drainage with stent insertion was performed for 15 patients (8 patients unfit for surgery, 5 patients starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol, and 2 patients with liver metastasis). Seven patients had postoperative complications (delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic anastomotic leaks and wound infection) and treated conservatively.
This study was approved by the local ethical committee of the Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University. Also assigned informed consent was obtained from all the participants in the present study.
Blood specimen collection and processing
Five milliliters blood samples was drawn from all participants. 2 mL blood was collected into tube with sodium citrate to separate plasma. The remaining 3 mL blood was pipetted into tube without anticoagulants and then left for 15 min at 37 °C before centrifuge to separate serum. Harvested plasma and serum were stored at −80 °C until used for determination of plasma miRNAs expression levels by real-time RT-PCR and serum CA19-9 concentration by electro-chemiluminescence immune assay (ECLIA).
Quantification of miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p expression by real-time RT-PCR (Ganepola et al. 2014)
miRNA extraction
The miRNeasy serum/plasma Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA-cat. no. 217184) is designed for purification of cell-free total RNA, primarily miRNA and other small RNA. To confirm the presence of miRNA in each sample, the total RNA was measured as ng/μL by using “Thermo Scientific NanoDrop instrument” (total RNA range 2.10–14.50 ng/μL).
The reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction
TaqMan™ MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for synthesis cDNA from total RNA. The reverse transcriptase reactions contained 5 μL of RNAs, 0.15 μL of 100 mM dNTPs, 1 μL 50 U/μL of MultiScribe™ Reverse Transcriptase, 1.5 μL of 10× Reverse Transcription Buffer, 0.19 μL of 20 U/μL RNase inhibitor, 4.16 μL of nuclease-free water and 3 μL of stem-loop RT primer. The reaction samples were incubated in PCR thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) for 30 min at 16 °C, 30 min at 42 °C, 5 min at 85 °C and then held at 4 °C. After the RT run, store the cDNA at 15–25 °C.
Real-time PCR
The quantification of each miRNA expression (miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p) was performed using TaqMan MicroRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). 1.33 μL of cDNA was amplified with 10 μL of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2X), 1 μL of gene-specific primers/probe, and 7.67 μL of nuclease-free water in a final volume of 20 μL. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 50 °C for 2 min then 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 60 s. Quantitative RT-PCR was run on the real-time PCR instruments (Applied Biosystems one step, Foster City, CA, USA). The TaqMan miRNA assays used were: hsa-miR 22-3p (ID#000398), hsa-miR-642b-3p (ID#462949_mat), hsa-miR-885-5p (ID#002296) and hsa-miR-3196 “housekeeping gene” (ID#241941_mat) (Ganepola et al. 2014).
Primer sequence of miR-22-3p:
5′-AAGCUGCCAGUUGAACUGU-3′
3′-GGAUCAUUGACCAGGUCAC-5′
Primer sequence of miR-642b-3P:
5′-AGACACAUUUGGAGAGGGACCC-3′
3′-GAGUGUGCCCAAGAGAAAGUUU-5′
Primer sequence of miR-885-5P:
5′-UCCAUUACACUACCCUGCCUCU-3′
3′-CUUGCCGUGUCGUUUCAUUCUC-5′
Primer sequence of miR-3196:
5′-CGGGGCGGCAGGGGCCUC-3′
3′-UAAAAUAAUGAAAAUUCU-5′
The relative quantification (RQ) of each miRNAs expression was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold Ct (2−ΔΔCt) method with miR-3196 as the endogenous control to normalize the quantitative PCR results (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Amplification curve for a housekeeping miR-3196, b miR-22, c miR-642b-3p and d miR-885-5p
Determination of CA19-9 by ECLIA
The assay is indicated for the serial measurement of CA 19-9 to aid in the management of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The analyzer automatically calculates the concentration of each sample in U/ml where the reference range is up to 33 U/mL.
Statistical analyses
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20. P values <0.05 were statistically significant. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables, to compare between different groups. For normally quantitative variables, Student’s t test was used to compare between two studied groups. For abnormally quantitative variables, Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare between two and more than two studied groups, respectively. Spearman coefficient was used to correlate between two abnormally quantitative variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) is generated by plotting sensitivity (TP) on Y-axis versus 1-specificity (FP) on X-axis at different cutoff values. The area under the ROC curve denotes the diagnostic performance of the test. Area more than 50 % gives acceptable performance, and area about 100 % is the best performance for the test.
Results
Demographic data and clinical characteristics
In PC patient, the mean level of total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, SGOT and SGPT was significantly increased as compared to control group (P < 0.001, Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic data and laboratory parameters in control and PC patient groups
| Control group (n = 15) | PC patients group (n = 35) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 4 (26.7 %) | 14 (40.0 %) | 0.368 |
| Female | 11 (73.3 %) | 21 (60.0 %) | |
| Age (years) | 40.93 ± 9.26 | 57.43 ± 10.82 | <0.001* |
| Total bilirubin | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 9.11 ± 6.01 | <0.001* |
| Direct bilirubin | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 5.69 ± 4.03 | <0.001* |
| SGOT | 18.67 ± 3.74 | 98.87 ± 53.67 | <0.001* |
| SGPT | 21.33 ± 4.24 | 100.29 ± 64.27 | <0.001* |
| WBC | 7.39 ± 1.83 | 8.37 ± 2.50 | 0.181 |
P value for Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis or Student’s t test for comparing PC patients with the control group
n = Number of cases in each group
* Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05
Table 2 demonstrates the CT findings for PC patients: All patients had mass size >2 cm, only one patient had tail mass (2.9 %), 2 patients had body mass (5.7 %), 4 patients had neck mass (11.4 %), and 28 patients had head mass (80 %). Only 24 patients (68.6 %) had common bile duct (CBD) dilatation. Out of all patients, only 2 patients (5.7 %) had liver metastasis, 10 patients (28.6 %) with regional lymph nodes, while no patients had ascites. Finally, there were 33 patients at an early stage {23 (65.7 %) with stage IB and 10 (28.6 %) with stage IIB} and 2 patients (5.7 %) with stage IV.
Table 2.
Association between miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-855-5p expression (copies), CA19-9 concentration (U/mL) and clinical criteria of PC patients
| n (%) | miR-22-3p | miR-642b-3p | miR-885-5p | CA19-9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 14 (40) | 1.65 | 6.45 | 4.90 | 507.0 |
| Female | 21 (60) | 2.20 | 4.60 | 2.80 | 342.0 |
| MW P value | 0.71 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.51 | |
| Mass size(>2 cm) | 35 (100) | ||||
| Mass site | |||||
| Head | 28 (80) | 2.09 | 4.70 | 2.80 | 429.60 |
| Neck | 4 (11.4) | 1.5 | 1.10 | 2.30 | 11.30 |
| Body | 2 (5.7) | 2.23 | 9.60 | 5.33 | 775.90 |
| Tail | 1 (2.9) | 1.79 | 10.0 | 7.95 | 97.0 |
| KW P value | 0.89 | 0.04* | 0.58 | 0.10 | |
| CBD dilatation | |||||
| Positive | 24 (68.6) | 2.20 | 5.20 | 3.20 | 571.50 |
| Negative | 11 (31.4) | 1.82 | 4.60 | 4.80 | 141.30 |
| MW P value | 0.28 | 0.85 | 0.49 | 0.13 | |
| Liver metastasis | |||||
| Positive | 2 (5.7) | 2.62 | 5.35 | 6.55 | 371.10 |
| Negative | 33 (94.3) | 1.98 | 5.20 | 3.60 | 443.0 |
| MW P value | 0.92 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 0.72 | |
| Lymph nodes | |||||
| Positive | 10 (28.6) | 1.76 | 5.20 | 3.28 | 466.0 |
| Negative | 25 (71.4) | 2.20 | 5.20 | 3.60 | 443.0 |
| MW P value | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.61 | |
| Ascites | |||||
| Positive | 0 | ||||
| Negative | 35 (100) | ||||
| Stage of PC | |||||
| IB | 23 (65.7) | 2.20 | 5.20 | 3.60 | 443.0 |
| IIB | 10 (28.6) | 1.76 | 5.20 | 3.28 | 466.0 |
| IV | 2 (5.7) | 2.62 | 8.35 | 6.55 | 371.10 |
| KW P value | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
The data were given as median
CBD Common bile duct, n number of PC patient, KW P value for Kruskal–Wallis test, MW P value for Mann–Whitney test
* Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05
Molecular and biochemical results
The mean values of miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p expression as well as CA19-9 concentration were significantly higher in PC patients than the corresponding values in the control group (P < 0.001) (Table 3). Also, there was significant increase in those miRNAs expression and CA19-9 concentration in patients with stages IB, IIB and IV as compared to the control group (Fig. 2a–d).
Table 3.
Plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-855-5p expression (copies) and CA19-9 concentration (U/mL) in control and PC patient groups
| Control group | Pancreatic cancer group | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR-22-3p | 0.89 ± 0.29 | 2.27 ± 1.18 | <0.001* |
| miR-642b-3p | 0.38 ± 0.42 | 6.41 ± 5.10 | <0.001* |
| miR-885-5p | 1.0 ± 0.08 | 5.18 ± 4.44 | <0.001* |
| CA19-9 | 25.67 ± 5.95 | 751.37 ± 1018.38 | <0.001* |
P value for Mann–Whitney test for comparing PC patients with the control group
* Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05
Fig. 2.
a MiR-22-3p, b MiR-642b-3p, c MiR-885-5p, d CA19-9 (U/mL) in control and PC patients groups with different stages
There was no association between miRNA-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-885-5p, CA19-9 and the abdominal CT finding (CBD dilatation, liver metastasis and peripancreatic Lymph nodes metastasis) in PC group except a significant association between miR-642-3p and pancreatic mass site (P = 0.042). For miRNAs and CA19-9, an association with tumor stage was found, as relative median expression of miRNAs increased with stage (P ≤ 0.001), while the relative median of CA19-9 decreased with stage (P ≤ 0.001) (Table 2).
There was no correlation between miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-885-5p expression, CA19-9 concentration and clinical parameters of PC patients except that there was significant positive correlation between CA19-9 and SGOT, SGPT and WBCs (P = 0.005, 0.003 and 0.011, respectively) (Fig. 3). In addition, there was no significant correlation between each of miRNAs expression and CA19-9 concentration.
Fig. 3.
Correlation between the CA19-9 concentration and a SGOT, b WBCs and c SGPT in patients group
The ROC curve analysis was used to compare the diagnostic values of miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-885-5p and CA 19-9 depending on AUC. The higher AUC corresponds to a better diagnostic test. MiR-22-3p showed a significant AUC (94.3 %, P < 0.001) with sensitivity (97.14 %) and specificity (93.33 %) at cutoff 0.96. Both miR-642b and miR-885-5p showed a significant AUC (100 %, P < 0.001) with sensitivity (100 %) and specificity (100 %) at cutoff 0.99 and 1.24, respectively. CA 19-9 showed a significant AUC (92.4 %, P < 0.001) with sensitivity (91.43 %) and specificity (100 %) at cutoff 34 (Table 4; Fig. 4).
Table 4.
Agreement (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) for miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-855-5p expression level and CA19-9 concentration
| Control | Cases | AUC | P | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiR-22-3p | ||||||||
| ≤0.96 | 14 | 1 | 0.943* | <0.001* | 97.14 | 93.33 | 96.0 | |
| >0.96 | 1 | 34 | ||||||
| MiR-642b-3p | ||||||||
| ≤0.99 | 15 | 0 | 1.000* | <0.001* | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| >0.99 | 0 | 35 | ||||||
| MiR-885-5p | ||||||||
| ≤1.24 | 15 | 0 | 1.000* | <0.001* | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| >1.24 | 0 | 35 | ||||||
| CA19-9 | ||||||||
| ≤34 | 15 | 3 | 0.924* | <0.001* | 91.43 | 100.0 | 94.0 | |
| >34 | 0 | 32 | ||||||
Asterisks indicate higher area under the curve corresponds to a better diagnostic test
Fig. 4.
ROC curve for miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p, miR-855-5p expression level and CA19-9 concentration to diagnose PC patients group
Discussion
Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer patients by using sensitive and specific biomarkers is considered necessary (Ko 2015). Although carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is the most common predictable diagnostic maker for PC patients, its levels often increase in the absence of PC (such as chronic pancreatitis or benign biliary obstruction) and it has poor sensitivity in the PC diagnosis (Winter et al. 2013).
MiRNAs have been well-known as master regulators of gene expression and many biological processes. MiRNAs are dysregulated in various cancers and can contribute to regulation of tumorigenesis and development by playing tumor suppressive and/or oncogenic roles (Price and Chen 2014). Definite miRNAs are involved in fundamental molecular processes associated with pancreatic cancer initiation and progression including cell cycle, DNA repair, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, metastasis and sensitivity to therapy through a mechanism including aberrant regulation of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes expression (Halkova et al. 2015).
Therefore, this study investigates the role of plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p expression levels as possible diagnostic tumor markers in PC patients as compared to serum CA19-9.
The plasma miRNAs expression levels (miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p) identified in this study were shown to be significantly up-regulated in PC patients as compared to the control group, and these results are in accordance with other studies (Ganepola et al. 2014; Li et al. 2013). The elevated level of circulating miRNAs (miR-22-3p, miR-885-5p and miR-642b-3p) in PC patients may be attributed to leak or release of tissue or organ-specific intracellular miRNAs into the circulation during processes accompanying cell death or apoptosis due to cell turnover, cellular destruction or pathological injury (Mitchell et al. 2008). In addition, the high level of miRNAs in the circulation could reflect a metabolic imbalance of these miRNAs in vivo (Gui et al. 2011).
In pancreatic cancer, the over-expression level of miRNA-22-3p induces inhibition of cell growth, metastasis and apoptosis through suppression its target genes; Sp1 transcription factor (SP1) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) (Park et al. 2011). Furthermore, miRNA-22-3p is proposed to be a putative tumor suppressor by repressing the EVI1 oncogene expression (Patel et al. 2011). MiRNA-22-3p inhibits cell cycle progression by post-transcription repression of Myc-associated factor x (Max) and ErbB3 expression, mediates the effects of the tumor-suppressor p53 and suppresses interferon gene expression by blocking interferon regulatory factor-5 (Ling et al. 2012; Ting et al. 2010; Polioudakis et al. 2013).
MiR-642 has putative targets involved in several important pathways including, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), apoptosis, tumor-suppressor protein (p53) and other signaling pathways. MAPK signaling is the most affected pathway by miR-642, and its activation by phosphorylation can result in either cell proliferation or apoptosis. TGF-β is involved in cell proliferation, cell adhesion, cell migration and cell differentiation. MiR-642 may regulate TGF-β-induced apoptosis and cell cycle (Kumar et al. 2011; Kim et al. 2000).
MiR-885-5p is recognized to have a tumor suppressive function by activating cell cycle arrest and induce apoptosis (Afanasyeva et al. 2011). MiR-885-5p inhibits cancer cell proliferation through induction of p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and leads to down-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK, proliferation-related genes) and mini-chromosome maintenance protein (MCM5). In addition, MiR-885-5p suppresses the expression of matrix metallopeptidase 9 and caspase genes such as CASP-3, which is an important mediator for apoptotic process (Afanasyeva et al. 2011; Yan et al. 2011; Guan et al. 2013). The overexpression of miR-885-5p in PC causes inhibition of tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis.
The data obtained from this study observed that the expression of three miRNAs (miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p) was significantly higher in PC patients with different stages IB, IIB and IV than that of the control group. Moreover, the expression of miRNAs tends to increase with PC stages. Previous study revealed that miRNA released from tumors tissue into the circulation by selective process of tumor derived exosomes, these may occur at an early stage in tumorigenesis as a mechanism for function regulation and miRNAs have been recognized in the blood stream at different stages of the disease (Taylor and Gercel-Taylo 2008; Schwarzenbach et al. 2014). Additionally, the plasma miRNAs expression level may be reflecting the degree of organ inflammation (Gui et al. 2011) and alterations of the entire organism homeostasis (Vietsch et al. 2015). From that, the aberrant high expression of miRNAs in circulation leads to use miRNAs as diagnostic marker of cancer at an early stage.
This study demonstrated that serum CA19-9 concentration was significantly higher in PC patients as well as in each stage of PC than the control group and these results concur with the findings of the previous studies (Ganepola et al. 2014; Li et al. 2013; Park et al. 2011). Since circulating CA19-9 is released from the cell surface of PC cells, the elevated level of CA19-9 in PC may be attributed to uncontrolled growth of aberrant epithelial cells and their continuous secretion of this antigen (Lin et al. 2014). In addition, any noxa (viral or toxic) causes stimulate tissue inflammatory damage and subsequently, reparative features with fibrotic tissue deposition and parenchymal regeneration can induce CA19-9 synthesis (Hekele and Muller 2006).
From the obtained data, the serum CA19-9 concentration tends to decrease with PC stages. CA19-9 is known to be sialylated Lewis (Le a) blood-group antigen. Serum level of CA19-9 varied according to the patient’s Lewis genotype and secretor status. In addition, the Lewis phenotype was determined by two independent genes: the Lewis gene or α1-4 fucosyltransferase (also known as FUT3) and the secretor gene or α1-2 fucosyltransferase (FUT2). Individuals who are Lewis blood type-negative (Lea−b−) do not express the CA19-9. The lower level of CA19-9 even when tumor burden is high may be attributed to deficiency of fucosyltransferase (enzyme essential for CA19-9 biosynthesis) and Lewis gene (Vestergaard et al. 1999; Su et al. 2015).
The results demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between miRNAs (miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p) and age, gender and some clinical parameters such as total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and tumor mass of PC patients. These results are in line with some previous studies by Gui et al. (2011) and Tian et al. (2012), who stated that there was no correlation between circulating miR-885-5p and traditional liver parameters (SGOT and SGPT). The lack of correlation may be the result of heterogeneity within the groups and/or to the small sample size (Garzon et al. 2008). Moreover, there was no correlation between miRNAs expression level and CA19-9 concentration and these was in accordance with previous study (Kojima et al. 2015).
There was a significant positive correlation between CA19-9 level and SGOT, SGPT and WBC’s count. These results agreed with Qureshi et al. (2006), Bertino et al. (2013), Amirkande et al. (2015). Serum CA19-9 up-regulation may be secondary to necroinflammatory processes, which in turn causes liver enzymes elevation in serum (Qureshi et al. 2006). On the other hand, there was no correlation between CA19-9 concentration and age, gender and some clinical parameters such as total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and tumor mass of PC patients. The lack of correlation could be attributed to the diversity of histological types of PC included in this study (Wang et al. 2013).
ROC curve approaches have been extensively used in evaluating the diagnosis power of markers. The values of plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p miR-885-5p expression levels and serum CA19-9 concentration in diagnosis of PC were evaluated by ROC curve analysis. The use of the area under ROC curve was useful in the elucidation of the validity of a specific marker in the diagnosis of PC. For plasma miRNA-22-3p, AUC = 94.3 %, P < 0.001, for both miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p, AUC = 100 %, P < 0.001, while for serum CA19-9, AUC = 92.4 %, P < 0.001. These results indicate the validity of using plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p miR-885-5p and serum CA19-9 as diagnostic markers for discriminating between PC patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, both plasma miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p were superior to plasma miR-22-3p followed by serum CA19-9 for diagnosis of PC. These results are consistent with previous study which indicated that circulating tumor miRNAs may be aberrantly highly expressed and therefore might be used as diagnostic markers (Liu et al. 2012), but with difference in sensitivity and specificity (Ganepola et al. 2014) and that may be attributed to variation in sample size, PC stage and histological types.
In conclusion, since circulating plasma miR-22-3p, miR-642b-3p and miR-885-5p are significantly elevated in PC patients, their measurement may prove to have clinical utility in diagnosis of PC. Those selected plasma miRNAs are ideal early biomarkers for PC diagnosis. So, they can effectively be used with serum CA19-9 for PC screening in early tumor stage.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the Local Ethical Committee of the Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.
References
- Abue M, Yokoyama M, Shibuya R, Tamai K, Yamaguchi K, Sato I (2015) Circulating miR-483-3p and miR-21 is highly expressed in plasma of pancreatic cancer. Int J Oncol 46:539–547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Afanasyeva EA, Mestdagh P, Kumps C, Vandesompele J, Ehemann V, Theissen J et al (2011) MicroRNA miR-885-5p targets CDK2 and MCM5, activates p53 and inhibits proliferation and survival. Cell Death Differ 18:974–984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amirkande SY, Assmar M, Faribors MG, Noor AM (2015) The frequency of CA15-3, CA125, CA19-9 in Patients with Hepatitis B and C. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 17:29–33 [Google Scholar]
- Bae S, Lim KM, Cha HJ, An IS, Lee JP, Lee KS et al (2014) Arctiin blocks hydrogen peroxide-induced senescence and cell death though microRNA expression changes in human dermal papilla cells. Biol Res 47:50–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becker AE, Hernandez YG, Frucht H, Lucas AL (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: risk factors, screening, and early detection. World J Gastroenterol 20:11182–11198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertino G, Ardiri AM, Calvagno GS, Malaguarnera G, Interlandi D, Vacante M et al (2013) Carbohydrate 19.9 antigen serum levels in liver disease. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, Yendamuri S et al (2004) Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2999–3004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chitkara D, Mittal A, Mahato RI (2015) MiRNAs in pancreatic cancer: therapeutic potential, delivery challenges and strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 81:34–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganepola GAP, Rutledge JR, Suman P, Yiengpruksawan A, Chang DH (2014) Novel blood-based microRNA biomarker panel for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 6:22–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garzon R, Volina S, Liu CG, Cymering CF, Palumbo T, Pichiorri F et al (2008) MicroRNA signatures associated with cytogenetic and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 111:3183–3189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gayral M, Jo S, Hanoun N, Vidoni AV, Lulka H, Delpu Y et al (2014) MicroRNAs as emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20:11199–11209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan X, Liu Z, Liu H, Yu H, Wang LE, Sturgis EM et al (2013) A functional variant at the miR-885-5p binding site of CASP3 confers risk of both index and second primary malignancies in patients with head and neck cancer. FASEB J 27:1404–1412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gui J, Tian Y, Wen X, Zhang W, Zhang P, Gao J (2011) Serum microRNA characterization identifies miR-885-5p as a potential marker for detecting liver pathologies. Clin Sci 120:183–193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gurha P, Abreu-Goodger C, Wang T, Ramirez MO, Drumond AL, Van Dongen S et al (2012) Targeted deletion of microRNA-22 promotes stress-induced cardiac dilation and contractile dysfunction. Circulation 125:2751–2761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halkova T, Cuperkova R, Minarik M, Benesova L (2015) MicroRNAs in pancreatic cancer: involvement in carcinogenesis and potential use for diagnosis and prognosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawa Z, Haque I, Ghosh A, Banerjee S, Harris LC, Banerjee SK (2016) The miRacle in Pancreatic Cancer by miRNAs: tiny Angels or Devils in Disease Progression. Int J Mol Sci 17:809–831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hekele MS, Muller C (2006) The combined elevation of tumor markers CA 19-9 and CA 125 in liver disease patients is highly specific for severe liver fibrosis. Dig Dis Sci 51:338–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JE, Kim SJ, Lee BH, Park RW, Kim KS, Kim IS (2000) Identification of motifs for cell adhesion within the repeated domains of transforming growth factor-beta-induced gene, betaig-h3. J Biol Chem 275:30907–30915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko AH (2015) Progress in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer and the search for next opportunities. J Clin Oncol 33:1779–1786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kojima M, Sudo H, Kawauchi J, Takizawa S, Kondou S, Nobumasa H et al (2015) MicroRNA markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary-tract cancers. PLoS ONE 10:1–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Kumar A, Shah PP, Rai SN, Panguluri SK, Kakar SS (2011) MicroRNA signature of cisplatin resistant vs. cisplatin sensitive ovarian cancer cell lines. J Ovarian Res 4:17–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li A, Yu J, Kim H, Wolfgang CL, Canto MI, Hruban RH et al (2013) MicroRNA array analysis finds elevated serum miR-1290 accurately distinguishes patients with low-stage pancreatic cancer from healthy and disease controls. Clin Cancer Res 19:3600–3610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin MS, Huang JX, Yu H (2014) Elevated serum level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in benign biliary stricture diseases can reduce its value as tumor marker. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:744–750 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ling B, Wang GX, Long G, Qiu JH, Hu ZL (2012) Tumor suppressor miR-22 suppresses lung cancer cell progression through post-transcriptional regulation of ErbB3. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:1355–1361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J, Gao J, Du Y, Li Z, Ren Y, Gu J et al (2012) Combination of plasma microRNAs with serum CA19-9 for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 131:683–691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL et al (2008) Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:10513–10518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Negrini M, Ferracin M, Sabbioni S, Croce CM (2007) MicroRNAs in human cancer: from research to therapy. J Cell Sci 120:1833–1840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson KM, Weiss GJ (2008) MicroRNAs and cancer: past, present, and potential future. Mol Cancer Ther 7:3655–3660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park JY, Helm J, Coppola D, Kim D, Mokenge M, Kim SJ (2011) MiroRNAs in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 17(7):817–827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel JB, Appaiah HN, Burnett RM, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Wang G, Mehta R et al (2011) Control of EVI-1 oncogene expression in metastatic breast cancer cells through microRNA miR-22. Oncogene 30:1290–1301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polioudakis D, Bhinge AA, Killion PJ, Lee BK, Abell NS, Iyer VR (2013) A Myc-microRNA network promotes exit from quiescence by suppressing the interferon response and cell-cycle arrest genes. Nucleic Acids Res 41:2239–2254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Price C, Chen J (2014) MicroRNAs in cancer biology and therapy: current status and perspectives. Genes Dis 1:53–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qureshi KM, Raman AK, Tan D, Fakih MG (2006) Leukemoid reaction in pancreatic cancer: a case report and review of the literature. JOP J Pancreas 7:631–634 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rachagania S, Machaa MA, Heimanna N, Seshacharyulua P, Haridasa D, Chugha S et al (2015) Clinical implications of miRNAs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 81:16–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzenbach H, Nishida N, Calin GA, Pantel K (2014) Clinical relevance of circulating cell-free microRNAs in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:145–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su SB, Qin SY, Chen W, Luo W, Jiang HX (2015) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 14(21):4323–4333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylo C (2008) MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110:13–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y, Gui J, Run W, Wen X, Zhang W, Zhang P (2012) Hepatic diseases related peripheral blood RNAs variation and their clinical significance. J Mol Biomark Diagn 3:39 [Google Scholar]
- Ting Y, Medina DJ, Strair RK, Schaar DG (2010) Differentiation-associated miR-22 represses Max expression and inhibits cell cycle progression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 394:606–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vestergaard EM, Hein HO, Meyer H, Grunnet N, Jørgensen J, Wolf H et al (1999) Reference values and biological variation for tumor marker CA 19-9 in serum for different Lewis and secretor genotypes and evaluation of secretor and Lewis genotyping in a Caucasian population. Clin Chem 45:54–61 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vietsch EE, Eijck CHJ, Wellstein A (2015) Circulating DNA and micro-RNA in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreat Disord Ther 5:1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang W, Li F, Zhang Y, Tu Y, Yang Q, Gao X (2013a) Reduced expression of miR-22 in gastric cancer is related to clinicopathologic characteristics or patient prognosis. Diagn Pathol 8:102–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang WS, Liu LX, Li GP, Chen Y, Li CY, Jin DY et al (2013b) Combined serum CA19-9 and miR-27a-3p in peripheral blood mononuclear cells to diagnose pancreatic cancer. Cancer Prev Res 6:331–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winter JM, Yeo CJ, Brody JR (2013) Diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 107:15–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong J, Yu D, Wei N, Fu H, Cai T, Huang Y et al (2010) An estrogen receptor alpha suppressor, microRNA-22, is downregulated in estrogen receptor alpha-positive human breast cancer cell lines and clinical samples. FEBS J 277:1684–1694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamakuchi M, Yagi S, Ito T, Lowenstein CJ (2011) MicroRNA-22 regulates hypoxia signaling in colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE 6:e20291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan W, Zhang W, Sun L, Liu Y, You G, Wang Y et al (2011) Identification of MMP-9 specific microRNA expression profile as potential targets of anti-invasion therapy in glioblastoma multiforme. Brain Res 1411:108–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu DC, Li QG, Ding XW, Ding YT (2011) Circulating microRNAs: potential biomarkers for cancer. Int J Mol Sci 12:2055–2063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaragosi LE, Wdziekonski B, Brigand KL, Villageois P, Mari B, Waldmann R et al (2011) Small RNA sequencing reveals miR-642a-3p as a novel adipocyte-specific microRNA and miR-30 as a key regulator of human adipogenesis. Genome Biol 12:1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP, Anderson TA (2007) MicroRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev Biol 302:1–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L, Jamaluddin MS, Weakley SM, Yao Q, Chen C (2011) Roles and mechanisms of microRNAs in pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 35:1725–1731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




