Abstract
The present study describes a rare case of hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (HCCC) of the tongue root and provides an analysis and review of the relevant literature to improve the understanding of its diagnosis and treatment. Clinical imaging and pathological data from a patient with primary HCCC of the tongue root were summarized, and previously published studies were reviewed through a literature search. The common symptoms, treatment strategies and prognoses reported in the literature were compared. A total of 16 cases of primary HCCC of the tongue were retrieved. Histologically, these cases had tumors characterized by clear cells arranged in sheets, nests and cords within the fibrous interstitium surrounding tumor cells, with round to oval cell nuclei occasionally containing small or inconspicuous nucleoli. Immunohistochemistry showed positive tumor cell staining for cytokeratin (CK)5/6, CK7 and p63, and negative for S-100, smooth muscle actin and calponin. Clinical symptoms included dysphagia, a painless mass, tongue root ulceration and a foreign body sensation in the throat. Treatment strategies included surgery, radiation therapy, repair and reconstruction, with no local recurrence or metastasis at any follow-up point. The present findings indicated that HCCC of the salivary glands is an inert malignant tumor, and a good prognosis can be achieved with both surgical resection and radiation therapy.
Keywords: HCCC, tongue, treatment, prognosis
Introduction
Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (HCCC), also known as clear cell carcinoma with hyalinization, is a rare, low-grade malignant neoplasm originating from the minor salivary glands. Initially described by Batsakis (1) in 1980, the definition of HCCC was later refined by Simpson et al (2) and Milchgrub et al (3). HCCC has been referred to as clear cell adenocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma (nonspecific) or clear cell carcinoma by various authoritative sources, including the Pathology Atlas Volume of the Military Forces Institute of Pathology (4), the 3rd edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Head and Neck Tumor Pathology and Genetics Classification (5), and the 4th edition of the WHO Head and Neck Tumor Classification (6). In the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors in 2022 it was renamed HCCC (7).
Salivary gland tumors account for 0.5% of all malignant tumors, with clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland representing ~1% of all salivary gland tumors globally. HCCC occurs only in the minor salivary glands and is characterized by slow growth, presenting as small inert masses with non-aggressive biological behavior (8). Morphologically, HCCC often presents as an irregularly shaped, hard mass with a rough, grayish-white and grayish-red surface. The tumor appears grayish-white in histological analysis, with hemorrhage and necrosis commonly seen in the center. The tumors exhibit poorly defined boundaries and infiltrate the surrounding tissues, with diameters typically ranging from 1 to 5 cm. A study in China involving 10 patients with clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland reported tumor diameters measuring 1.5-5.0 cm, with a mean of 3 cm (9). Additionally, Zhang et al (10) analyzed the histological morphology of eight cases diagnosed as HCCC of the salivary gland at the Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Fudan University between January 2015 and October 2019. A basal cell-like arrangement was seen in a few cases, with occasional keratinization in the nests. This previous study concluded that, histologically, the tumor showed infiltrative growth, and the tumor cells were arranged in trabecular, cord-like or solid nest structures.
Because of its rarity, HCCC lacks sufficient clinical trials to establish standardized treatment protocols. Moreover, it is not well known to pathologists, leading to frequent misdiagnoses. Therefore, the present study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of clear cell carcinoma of the salivary glands from various perspectives, including clinical signs, imaging features, pathological manifestations, treatment methods and prognosis, through a case report and literature review.
Case report
Clinical data and medical history
The patient was a 52-year-old woman who presented with a foreign body sensation at the root of the tongue and dysphagia for >1 month. The patient denied experiencing pain, dyspnea, voice changes or any generalized discomfort, and reported no history of smoking or alcoholism. No enlarged lymph nodes were detected in the bilateral maxillofacial area and neck. The tongue mobility was fair, with centered extension, and no apparent signs of enlargement were observed at the root of the tongue.
A total of 2 weeks before admission, the patient visited the otorhinolaryngology department of a local hospital, where a laryngoscopy revealed a new mass at the root of the tongue. The excised mass was then subjected to a biopsy, and the pathology results indicated a malignant tumor of small salivary gland origin, with a high likelihood of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC).
Preoperative imaging
Enhanced head and neck computed tomography (CT) revealed a homogeneously enhancing mass to the right of the tongue root, causing narrowing of the right epiglottic vallecular (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck showed an abnormal signal to the right of the posterior root of the tongue, suggesting an abnormal localization (Fig. 2).
Figure 1.
Preoperative enhanced CT images of the patient. The sagittal, horizontal and coronal planes of the CT images reveal a well-defined nodular soft tissue shadow on the right side of the tongue root (arrow). The lesion had regular edges, although the tongue border was unclear. The maximum cross-section measured ~3.7×2.3 cm, with no enlarged lymph nodes in the maxillofacial and cervical regions. Additionally, there was no apparent thickening or protrusion on either side of the inner wall of the vocal folds. The laryngeal soft tissue structure remained symmetrical, with no apparent high-density masses. The epiglottis was not visibly enlarged, the pyriform sinuses on both sides and the paralaryngeal space were clear, and there was no damage to the surrounding bone. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 2.
Preoperative laryngeal magnetic resonance imaging of the patient. The image revealed a soft tissue mass shadow on the right side of the posterior part of the tongue root with slightly high signal intensity on the T2WI fat-compression image (arrow), along with a linear isointense shadow within the lesion. The lesion measured ~3.5×2.3 cm, with compression of the epiglottic vallecula. The enhancement scan showed significant homogeneous lesion enhancement and no obviously enlarged lymph nodes were observed bilaterally in the neck.
Preoperative pathology result
Immunohistochemical staining revealed the following results: p40 (+), cytokeratin (CK)5/6 (+), p53 (+50%), CK7 (+) and P16 showing partial positivity. Following consultation with the local hospital pathology department, the diagnosis was refined to a salivary gland epithelial tumor with low malignancy.
Surgical procedure
The treatment plan and potential surgical complications were discussed with the patient and their family, and an informed consent form was signed. The procedure involved a right functional neck dissection, localized extended lumpectomy of the right tongue root, median mandibulotomy and anterolateral thigh flap transplantation.
A post-cervical lymphatic incision was made on the right side of the neck, allowing for clearance of the right functional cervical lymph nodes. The internal jugular vein and parasympathetic nerves were preserved and the tongue root and mass were fully exposed through the median mandibular splitting. Following the No-Tumor Principle (11), a partially enlarged surgical resection was performed at the edge of the mass, and an anterolateral thigh flap was used to repair the defective area of the tongue root. Postoperatively, a tracheostomy was performed, and the right side of the tongue root mass and the lymphatic tissue were histopathologically examined.
Postoperative pathological results
Histopathologically examining the tongue root mass revealed mucosal irregularities, measuring 6.2×5.4×3.8 cm, with grayish-white nodules. The tumor, measuring 4.2×2.3×2 cm, exhibited a relatively firm consistency. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed that the tumor cells were arranged in sheets, nests and thin cords. The cytoplasm of the tumor cells was transparent, the stroma around the nests of the cells was reddish-stained, and the mesenchymal stroma around the tumor showed fibrous changes (Fig. 3). The fixative was 10% formalin and the tissues were fixed at room temperature for 24 h. The thickness of the sections was 4 µm. Staining was performed at room temperature, with Hematoxylin applied for 5 min and Eosin for 2 min. We used a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 inverted microscope.
Figure 3.
Hematoxylin and eosin staining results of the tongue root mass. (A) The area indicated by the arrow shows the cell nuclei were small with inconspicuous nucleoli and distinct cell boundaries (magnification, ×40). (B) Hyaline cells formed strips or trabeculae, extruding hyalinized and sclerotic fibrous mesenchyme (arrow) (magnification, ×100). (C) The stroma surrounding the cell nests shows a fibrillary red staining, and the mesenchyme around the tumor was fibrocystic in nature. Tumor cells infiltrated into the fibrous interstitium as indicated by the arrow (magnification, ×200). (D) Cancer cells were distributed in nests within the fibrous interstitium with a more homogeneous nuclear morphology, and the phenomenon of nuclear fission was infrequent as indicated by the arrow (magnification, ×400).
Immunohistochemical staining revealed the following results: CK5/6 (+), CK7 (+), calponin (−), p63 (+), CD117 (−), p40 (+), Ki-67 (5% +), CD34 (−), S-100 (−) and SOX10 (−; Fig. 4). The tissues used for immunohistochemistry were paraffin-embedded, and the sections were cut to a thickness of 4 micrometers. The blocking reagent used was 5% BSA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), applied at room temperature for 1 h. The primary antibody was diluted to 1:200, obtained from Roche, America, catalogue number CK5/6: 790-4554; CK7: 790-4462; Calponin: 760-4376; P63: 790-4509; CD117: 08763909001; P40: 790-4950; Ki-67: 790-4286; CD34: 790-2927; SOX10: 790-4968; DOG-1: 760-4590; S-100: 790-2914, and incubated overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody dilution: 1:200, catalogue number: bs-9912R, supplier, conjugate, Bioss, China, temperature: 25°C and duration of incubation: 1 h. The images were captured using Nikon Eclipse Ti2 inverted microscope. Although acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were suspected, they were ruled out by a negative DOG1 result (Fig. 4) (12). DOG1, or discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumors 1, is an immunohistochemical marker primarily used to identify AciCC among salivary gland tumors, as AciCC often exhibits positive DOG1 expression. According to Khurram and Speight (12), DOG1 is valuable for differentiating AciCC from tumors with similar histological features, such as clear cell carcinoma, where DOG1 is typically negative. In the present case, the negative DOG1 result helped exclude AciCC, guiding toward a rarer diagnosis of HCCC of the tongue root. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results revealed positive breakage recombination of the EWSR1 gene (Fig. S1). Based on these findings, the morphology and immunophenotype of the mass were indicative of clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland. No metastasis was observed in the cervical lymph nodes (0/5).
Figure 4.
Immunohistochemical staining results of the tongue root mass. (A) CK5/6 (+), magnification ×100, (B) CK7 (+), magnification ×100, (C) calponin (−), magnification ×40, (D) p63 (+), magnification ×40, (E) Ki-67 (5%+), magnification ×40, (F) CD34 (−), magnification ×40, (G) S-100 (−), magnification ×40, (H) SOX10 (−), magnification ×40 and (I) DOG-1 (−), magnification ×40. CK, cytokeratin.
After consulting with the multidisciplinary tumor team and considering the extensive nature of the surgery, the patient received 1 month of adjuvant radiation therapy. The specific radiation therapy plan, based on the diagnosis of T3N0M0 clear cell carcinoma at the tongue root, outlined the target area as the preoperative tumor area and bilateral cervical lymph nodes (areas Ib, II and III). A total dose of 60 Gy was administered over 30 routine irradiation sessions, with each session delivering 2 Gy, conducted 6 times/week for 5 weeks. Because it was a low-grade malignant tumor, radiotherapy was not planned for the lymph node drainage area in zone IV. The target area, including the oropharyngeal mucosa, was relatively large, and the patient exhibited a slightly heightened radiation response.
Postoperative imaging examination
A total of 2 months following the operation, an enhanced CT scan of the tongue was performed. The results showed the structural disorder of the tongue root and disorganization of the mandibular operation area. Mixed-density and linear enhancement from the operative area to the right sternocleidomastoid muscle tract were also observed. The right submandibular gland was not visible (Fig. 5), consistent with the postoperative changes from the localized surgery. There were no apparent signs of recurrence or metastasis.
Figure 5.
Postoperative enhanced computed tomography of the tongue. The image revealed discontinuity in the alignment of the cortical and mandibular bones. The right side of the tongue was partially missing, and the structure of the operative area was disorganized (arrow). The right submandibular gland was not visible, and the operative area appeared as a dense nodular shadow. Pore patches of adipose tissue accumulation and soft tissue density shadows were observed from the operative area to the right sternocleidomastoid muscle. The enhancement scan of the operative area showed linear enhancement of density shadows. The right submandibular area of soft tissue was slightly swollen, and the surrounding fat interstitial space was slightly turbid. The right laryngopharyngeal and oropharyngeal cavities were slightly narrowed, indicative of postoperative change.
Medical history
The patient underwent a biopsy in August 2023, at the People's Hospital of Changji Hui Autonomous State (Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China. They were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, China) 7 days later and were treated by a surgeon 5 days after admission. The patient was discharged in September 2023. The patient was followed up at 1 month, three and six months after discharge, with the most recent follow-up in July 2024. The preoperative immunohistochemistry and biopsy pathology images are unavailable, as these diagnostic procedures were performed at another hospital (People's Hospital of Changji Hui Autonomous State).
Literature review
A comprehensive literature review was performed by searching the key words ‘clear cell carcinoma’ and ‘salivary gland’ in the PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and CNKI (cnki.net) databases. After excluding reports on clear cell carcinoma in non-salivary gland areas and non-tongue primary lesions, 277 reports were retrieved. After thoroughly reviewing these reports and their relevant references, 15 reports with adequate clinical data, including complete pre- and postoperative information, were identified (Fig. 6).
Figure 6.
Schematic diagram of the literature review for HCCC. HCCC, hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma.
Table I presents the clinical and statistical features of 16 cases of primary clear cell carcinoma of the tongue, including the present case (13–25). Among these patients, nine were female and seven were male, with an average age of 53 years (range: 33-69 years). Typical symptoms included dysphagia, a painless mass, tongue root ulceration and a foreign body sensation in the throat. Dysphagia occurred in eight cases and a painless mass was noted in three cases, with the duration of these symptoms ranging from 1 to 6 months. The tumor size was mentioned in 11 cases, with an average diameter of 3.27 cm (range: 1.00-5.50 cm). The primary tumor lesion was located in the tongue in all 16 patients, with 14 in the tongue root and two in the ventral tongue. Lymph node metastasis was observed in five patients.
Table I.
Published cases of primary clear cell carcinoma of the tongue root.
| First author, year | Age, years/sex | Clinical symptoms | Tumor size and location | Metastasis | Treatment | Follow-up | Results | (Refs.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present case | 52/F | Foreign body | 4.2×2.3×2.0 cm; | No metastasis | The right-side | No recurrence | CK5/6 (+), CK7 (+), | - |
| sensation at the | located on the | functional | within 3 months | calponin (−), p63 (+), | ||||
| tongue root | right side behind | neck dissection + | CD117 (−), p40 (+), | |||||
| with dysphagia | the tongue root | the right side of | Ki-67 (5% +), | |||||
| for 1 month | the tongue root | CD34 (−), S-100 (−), | ||||||
| local extended | SOX10 (−) and | |||||||
| lumpectomy + | DOG-1 (−); positive | |||||||
| median | breakage recom- | |||||||
| mandibulotomy + | bination of the | |||||||
| Anterolateral | EWSR1 gene | |||||||
| thigh flap | ||||||||
| transplantation + | ||||||||
| tracheostomy + | ||||||||
| postoperative | ||||||||
| radiotherap | ||||||||
| Dabas et al, 2023 | 33/F | Dysphagia, voice | 5.5×4.4×4.1 cm; | Not mentioned | Surgical excision + | No recurrence | Not mentioned | (13) |
| changes and right | located bilaterally | tracheostomy + | as of 2023 | |||||
| ear pain for | at the tongue root, | postoperative | ||||||
| 6 months | extending to the | radiotherapy | ||||||
| anterior tongue, | ||||||||
| adjacent to the | ||||||||
| epiglottis and | ||||||||
| tonsils | ||||||||
| Sento et al, 2020 | 59/M | A painless mass | 2.8×2.1×1.5 cm; | Not mentioned | Complete tumor | No local | p63 (+), S-100 (−), | (14) |
| on the inferior | located on the | resection + partial | recurrence or | αSMA (−), CD10 (−), | ||||
| surface of the | inferior surface | glossectomy with | metastasis at | GFAP (−), | ||||
| tongue | of the tongue | ~1 cm safe margin + | the 5-year | vimentin-Ki-67 | ||||
| reconstruction with | postoperative | <10% and | ||||||
| a free forearm flap | follow-up | EWSR1-ATF1 fusion | ||||||
| Yoldez et al, 2022 | 37/M | An ulcerated and | 3.0×0.5 cm; | Not mentioned | Surgical excision | Not mentioned | p40 (+), CD10 (−) | (15) |
| painful indu- | located at the | p40 (+), CD10 (−) | ||||||
| ration of the base | base of the tongue; | |||||||
| of the tongue | poorly circum- | |||||||
| scribed with | ||||||||
| infiltration of the | ||||||||
| adjacent tissue | ||||||||
| Pillai et al, 2019 | 42/M | Swallowing diffi- | 3.0×2.0 cm;a large, | No neck nodes | Excision biopsy + | No local | CK AE1/AE3 (+), | (16) |
| culty for 5 months | smooth, broad- | were palpable; | coblation + | recurrence at | CK5/6 (+), p63 (+), | |||
| and feeling of | based mass at the | no metastasis | postoperative | 1-year | S-100 (−) and | |||
| choking sensation | posterior one-third | radiotherapy | follow-up | CD10 (−) | ||||
| in the throat | of the tongue | |||||||
| intermittently. | obstructing the | |||||||
| No associated | laryngeal inlet | |||||||
| voice change or | ||||||||
| dyspnea | ||||||||
| Lin et al, 2015 | 37/F | Painless swelling | 1×1 cm nodule on | Not mentioned | Further excision | Not mentioned | CKAE1/3 (+), | (17) |
| on the ventral | the left ventral | with safe resection | p63 (+), SMA (−), | |||||
| tongue that had | tongue | margin | CD10 (−), S-100 (−), | |||||
| been present for | GFAP (−), MSA (−) | |||||||
| months | and EWSR1 gene | |||||||
| rearrangement | ||||||||
| Hu and Li, 2005 | 69/M | Restricted tongue | 5.0 cm maximum | 1/64 | Surgical excision + | No local | EMA (+), CK8 (+), | (18) |
| movement for | diameter at the | postoperative | recurrence or | CK18 (−), | ||||
| 5 months | base of the tongue | radiotherapy | metastasis at | CKHMW (−), | ||||
| 4-month | CK10/13 (−), | |||||||
| follow-up | S-100 (−), SMA (−), | |||||||
| and calponin (−) | ||||||||
| Bala- | 35/M | Swallowing | 3.0×2.0 cm; | Cervical | Excisional biopsy | No local | Immunohisto- | (19) |
| krishnan et al, | difficulty for | smooth and | second abdo- | was performed with | recurrence or | chemistry was not | ||
| 2002 | 5 months and | elevated yellowish- | minal lymph | the assistance of a | metastasis at | performed | ||
| feeling of choking | white lesion | nodes and | microlaryngoscope | 1-year | ||||
| sensation in the | extending from the | submandibular | and surgical | follow-up. | ||||
| throat | midline to the | lymph nodes | microscope; 2 weeks | The patient | ||||
| intermittently | lingual groove of | could be | later, extensive re- | accepted the | ||||
| the right tonsil | palpated on | section of the lesion | result because | |||||
| the right side, | through a trans- | of good | ||||||
| each | mandibular | phonetics | ||||||
| ~2.0×1.0 cm, | approach was | |||||||
| with no | performed, with the | |||||||
| pressure pain | defect reconstructed | |||||||
| with a tongue flap. | ||||||||
| A scapulohyoid | ||||||||
| supraglottic cervical | ||||||||
| lymph node dis- | ||||||||
| section and frozen- | ||||||||
| section biopsy of an | ||||||||
| isolated lymph node | ||||||||
| were performed | ||||||||
| prior to the resection | ||||||||
| Chapman et al, | 68/F | Not mentioned | 3.0 cm; the left | Not mentioned | Excisional biopsy | No local | CK5 (+), p63 (+), | (20) |
| 2018 | base of the tongue | with positive | recurrence or | S-100 (−), SMA (−), | ||||
| margins. Left level | metastasis at | negative MAML2 | ||||||
| II–III lymph node | 18-month | breakage, positive | ||||||
| clearance showed | follow-up | EWSR1 rearrange- | ||||||
| negative results. | ment and intact ATF1 | |||||||
| Wang et al, 2018 | 69/M | Not mentioned | The base of the | 1/64 | Combined left | No local | CK (+), S-100 (+) | (21) |
| left tongue | lingual and cervical | recurrence or | and SMA (−) | |||||
| curettage + right | metastasis at | |||||||
| zonal cervical | 42-month | |||||||
| lymph node | follow-up | |||||||
| dissection + | ||||||||
| pectoralis major | ||||||||
| myocutaneous flap | ||||||||
| repair | ||||||||
| Wang et al, 2018 | 47/F | Dysphagia | Base of the left | No metastasis | Extended resection + | No recurrence at | CK (+) and SMA (−) | (21) |
| tongue | adjacent flap repair | 12-month | ||||||
| without cervical | follow-up | |||||||
| lymph node | ||||||||
| dissection | ||||||||
| Wang et al, 2018 | 67/M | Not mentioned | The base of the | 0/17 | Extended resection + | No recurrence | CK (+), SMA (−) | (21) |
| right tongue | right zonal cervical | at 6-month | and S-100 (−) | |||||
| lymph node | follow-up | |||||||
| dissection + radial | ||||||||
| forearm free flap | ||||||||
| Al Zadjali et al, | 38/F | A 2-week history | 2.9×5.2×3.2 cm; | 2/32 | Tracheostomy + | No recurrence | CK5 (+), CK7 (+), | (22) |
| 2023 | of a sore throat | left root of the | Transcer-vical | at 12-month | p40 (+), p63 (+), | |||
| superimposed on | tongue and left | transmandibular | follow-up | S-100 (−), | ||||
| a 4-year history | tonsil | approach for wide | SOX10 (−) and | |||||
| of hemoptysis. | excision of the | EWSR1-ATF1 fusion | ||||||
| During this time, | lesion + neck | |||||||
| they also | dissection + radial | |||||||
| experienced | forearm free flap + | |||||||
| progressive | postoperative | |||||||
| dysphagia and | adjuvant | |||||||
| odynophagia | radiotherapy | |||||||
| O'Sullivan- | 59/F | Dysphagia | 3 cm; left root of | No metastasis | Surgical extended | No recurrence | CK (+), p63 (+), | (23) |
| Mejia et al. 2009 | the tongue. | resection | during | EMA (+), PAS (+), | ||||
| follow-up | CAM5.2 (weak +), | |||||||
| S-100 (−), desmin (−), | ||||||||
| TGB (−) and Mu (−) | ||||||||
| Suzuki et al, 2006 | 66/F | Dysphagia, denial | 4×3×2.5 cm; | No metastasis | Tracheostomy + | No recurrence | Not mentioned | (24) |
| of respiratory | tongue root | resection via the | at 21-month | |||||
| distress | paramedian | follow-up | ||||||
| mandibulotomy | ||||||||
| combined with a | ||||||||
| right-sided supra- | ||||||||
| omohyoid neck | ||||||||
| dissection. A macro- | ||||||||
| scopic surgical | ||||||||
| margin was set at | ||||||||
| ~10 mm. Both the | ||||||||
| lingual and | ||||||||
| hypoglossal | ||||||||
| nerves were | ||||||||
| preserved. | ||||||||
| Zhao et al, 2022 | 67/M | Neck mass found | The right root of | Right cervical | Extensive total | No recurrence | CK5/6 (+), p40 (+), | (25) |
| for >1 year | the tongue | lymph node | excision of the | at 26-month | p63 (+), CK7 (+), | |||
| metastasis | mass + cervical | follow-up | EMA (+), | |||||
| (3/16) | lymph node | Ki-67 (5-10% +), | ||||||
| dissection | CD117 (−), | |||||||
| CD10 (−), GFAP (−), | ||||||||
| SMA (−), S-100 (−), | ||||||||
| calponin (−), positive | ||||||||
| breakage recom- | ||||||||
| bination of EWSR1 |
CK, cytokeratin; HCCC, hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma; SMA, smooth muscle actin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; CAM5.2, cytokeratin antibody marker 5.2; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; PAS, periodic acid-schiff.
Treatment was consistent across cases, with all patients undergoing extended local tumor resection. Additionally, seven of the 16 patients underwent repair and reconstruction, and five received postoperative radiotherapy. Postoperative follow-up information was unavailable for two patients; however, no recurrence was observed in the other 14 patients during the follow-up period. The findings suggested that clear cell carcinoma has a good prognosis when treated with localized mass-enlarged resection and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy.
Discussion
HCCC of the salivary glands typically presents as a slow-growing, painless submucosal mass with no surface ulceration. Consequently, symptoms are often present for an extended period before the patient seeks treatment. Most of the aforementioned cases involve tumors with a size of 3-5 cm in diameter (13–25).
Clear cells are present in a number of other salivary gland tumors, necessitating differential diagnoses that rely on a combination of immunohistochemistry, specific staining and the morphological features of HCCC of the salivary glands. The histological features observed in the 16 cases reported on in the present study were as follows: Tumor cells were arranged in sheets, nests or thin cords with clear boundaries; the cytoplasm was transparent; the nuclei were round or oval in shape and relatively uniform in size; the nucleoli were inconspicuous; and mitotic figures were rare. In addition, nuclear fission was rare; the stroma around the cell nests was stained red, and the mesenchyme around the tumor was fibrous. The tumor cells grew infiltratively into the fibrous mesenchyme. Immunohistochemical results were positive for epithelial markers, such as CK5/6, CK7 and p63, and negative for myoepithelial markers, such as S-100 and SOX-10.
The immunohistochemical features of HCCC of the salivary gland overlap with those of various salivary tumors, such as MEC and squamous cell carcinoma, all of which are positive for CK7, p63 and p40, and negativity for S-100 and SOX-10. In the last decade, advances in molecular techniques have demonstrated recurrent genetic alterations in some salivary gland tumors, including the fusion of genes such as ETV6 in secretory carcinoma, MYB and MYBL1 in adenoid cystic carcinoma, and MAML2 in MEC (26–28). Additionally, EWSR1-ATF1 rearrangements have been found in HCCC, and HRAS exon three mutations are seen in most cases of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (29,30). HRAS exon three mutations and a high percentage of EWSR1 rearrangements are commonly detected in clear cell subtype myoepithelial carcinoma (31). FISH technology serves a vital role in pathological research, particularly in detecting recombination in the EWSR1 gene, a significant genetic alteration commonly observed across various tumor types (32–34). FISH allows for the precise detection of EWSR1 gene recombination, aiding in tumor characterization. The technique has high sensitivity and specificity for identifying chromosomal abnormalities, making it an integral part of diagnostic processes (35–37). In the present case, FISH results showed positive EWSR1 gene breakage recombination, confirming the diagnosis of HCCC of the salivary glands and ruling out MEC.
HCCC can be differentiated from MEC and metastatic clear cell carcinoma (MCCC) in several ways (31,38). First, MEC is a malignant tumor with varying proportions of mucous, intermediate and epidermoid cells. It can occasionally include columnar cells, clear cells and eosinophils. While the tumor often demonstrates cystic growth, a clear cell component is generally rare and atypical. Second, the most common origin site of clear cell carcinoma is the kidney, and thus, MCCC typically arises from distant organs, such as the kidneys. Clinically, MCCC presentation varies depending on the site of metastasis. Imaging studies such as CT, MRI and pathological evaluations, including immunohistochemical staining, are crucial for an accurate diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry of MCCC typically shows positivity for PAX8 and CK7, along with increased expression of HIF-1α and VEGF. The pathological features of MCCC resemble those of primary clear cell carcinoma, but a thorough medical history, imaging and specific immunohistochemical markers can help make a proper differentiation. Based on these differences and the tumor origin, the present study ruled out a diagnosis of either MEC or MCCC.
Due to the rarity of HCCC in the salivary glands, there are insufficient clinical trials to determine standardized treatment protocols. Most malignant salivary gland tumors require postoperative radiation therapy to reduce the recurrence rate owing to undesirable features, such as limited margins for resection. Postoperative radiation therapy is also indicated for some moderately to highly differentiated tumors with T-stage 3-4 or lymph node metastases (39). All 16 cases of primary HCCC of the tongue assessed in the present literature review underwent localized enlarged mass resection; five cases underwent postoperative radiotherapy, whereas 11 did not. None of the patients experienced local recurrence or lymph node metastasis during the follow-up period. Desai et al (40) specifically analyzed 201 of 254 cases of HCCC of the salivary glands and described the treatment options. The most common approach was surgical resection with extensive margins (81.1%). Cervical lymph node dissection was performed in 10.4% of the cases. Adjuvant treatments were rarely performed, with radiotherapy or chemotherapy administered in only 17.9% of the cases. Of the 223 cases in which recurrence was reported, at least one localized recurrence was observed in 15.2% of cases and more than one recurrence in 3.6%, resulting in a recurrence rate of 18.8% (40). Analyses of the salivary gland cases collected by Desai et al (40), along with the cases of primary HCCC of the tongue collected in the present study, showed a low recurrence rate, likely due to the low degree of malignancy, low biological aggressiveness, and low rate of lymphatic and distant metastasis of the tumors. It was also indicated that patients with HCCC of the salivary gland had a better overall prognosis if they underwent complete localized extended resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy. However, despite the low malignancy and recurrence rate of this type of cancer, lymph node, lung and spinal metastases have been reported in a number of cases (38,40–43). Therefore, long-term clinical follow-up after complete tumor resection is essential.
The present study has one specific limitation; photographic documentation of the surgical specimen was not obtained during the procedure. However, detailed written records and descriptions were meticulously maintained to ensure comprehensive case documentation.
In conclusion, HCCC is a rare, low-grade malignant salivary gland tumor characterized by slow clinical progression. It is often confused with benign or other salivary gland tumors, and its diagnosis relies on complete histological morphology and immunohistochemical examination. The FISH test for the fusion of the MAML2 and EWSR1 genes aids in making a conclusive diagnosis. The preferred treatment is extended resection of the localized mass, with radiotherapy based on lymph node metastasis and pathological examination to minimize local recurrence and improve the overall patient prognosis.
There are relatively few reports of HCCC occurring in the maxillofacial region, and the present case provides some new insights into its diagnosis and treatment. It is necessary to build a solid foundation to enhance knowledge of this disease, including its clinical manifestations, imaging features and treatment options. This will improve differential diagnosis for this rare disease when patients present with these characteristics. Surgical treatment of HCCC should be specialized and distinct from standard procedures. Future research may delve more deeply into the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying HCCC.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- CT
computed tomography
- FISH
fluorescence in situ hybridization
- HCCC
hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma
- WHO
World Health Organization
Funding Statement
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
Authors' contributions
BL, LL and XC conceived and designed the study. JW, YX, YF, XT collected and analyzed data. LL and XC drafted the initial manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. LL and BL confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (approval no. K202405-30), acknowledging the study's contribution to medical progress and patient safety. The study complied with ethical standards, ensuring the patient's autonomy, privacy and data confidentiality. The imaging and diagnostic data are used solely for academic and educational purposes. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Patient consent for publication
The patient provided written informed consent for publication, authorizing the use of their imaging, pathological and clinical data for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Batsakis JG. Clear cell tumors of salivary glands. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:196–197. doi: 10.1177/000348948008900222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Simpson RH, Sarsfield PT, Clarke T, Babajews AV. Clear cell carcinoma of minor salivary glands. Histopathology. 1990;17:433–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1990.tb00764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Milchgrub S, Gnepp DR, Vuitch F, Delgado R, Albores-Saavedra J. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of salivary gland. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:74–82. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199401000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Tumors of the salivary glands (fourth series, fascicle 9) ARP Press; Maryland: 2008. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) Atlas of tumor pathology; pp. 301–309. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thompson L. World Health Organization classification of tumors: Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumors. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006;85:74. doi: 10.1177/014556130608500201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ. 4th edition. IARC Press; Lyon: 2017. WHO classification of head and neck tumors; pp. 168–169. [Google Scholar]
- 7.WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, corp-author. WHO classification of tumours series. 5th edition. IARC Press; Lyon: 2022. Head and neck tumours; pp. 664–669. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sanjai K, Shivalingaiah D, Sharath R, Pandey B. Clear cell carcinoma of palatine salivary gland: A diagnostic challenge. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22:128–131. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_236_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gai J, Lu X. Clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis of nonspecific clear cell carcinoma of salivary gland. J Mod Med. 2013;41:520–522. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Y, Wang Z, Chen T, Bai Q, Li X. Clinicopathological characterization of 8 cases of vitelliform clear cell carcinoma of salivary gland. Chin J Cancer. 2023;33:168–173. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kamat M, Rai BD, Puranik RS, Datar UV. A comprehensive review of surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma highlighting the significance of tumor-free surgical margins. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15:449–454. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_273_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khurram SA, Speight PM. Characterisation of DOG-1 expression in salivary gland tumours and comparison with myoepithelial markers. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13:140–148. doi: 10.1007/s12105-018-0917-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dabas SK, Menon NN, Ranjan R, Tiwari S, Gurung B, Shukla H, Dua A, Sharma A, Sinha A, Singla R, et al. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of base of the tongue-case report and review of literature. Ann Indian Acad Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;7:11–17. doi: 10.4103/aiao.aiao_3_23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sento S, Kudo Y, Hibiya K, Ishimaru N, Sasabe E, Kitamura N, Yamamoto T. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of the anterior lingual salivary gland: A case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2020;32:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2020.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yoldez H, Rahma Y, Maha D. An unmistakable tumour of the tongue. J Oral Health Craniofac Sci. 2022;7:20–21. doi: 10.29328/journal.johcs.1001040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pillai N, Balasundaram P, Isaac N. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma: Base of tongue. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71((Suppl 1)):S239–S242. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-01573-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin JC, Liao JB, Fu HT, Chang TS, Wang JS. Salivary gland hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma. J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49:351–353. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2015.05.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu Y, Li J. Clinicopathologic analysis of 10 cases of clear cell carcinoma of salivary gland. Chin J Stomatol. 2005;40:54–57. (In Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Balakrishnan R, Nayak DR, Pillai S, Rao L. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116:851–853. doi: 10.1258/00222150260293718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chapman E, Skalova A, Ptakova N, Martinek P, Goytain A, Tucker T, Xiong W, Leader M, Kudlow BA, Haimes JD, et al. Molecular profiling of hyalinizing clear cell carcinomas revealed a subset of tumors harboring a novel EWSR1-CREM fusion: Report of 3 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:1182–1189. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Q, Shen Y, Sun J. Diagnosis and treatment of clear cell carcinoma of salivary gland. Chin J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008:266–269. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Al Zadjali F, Alsaffar H, Odell M, Wasserman JK, Tohme A, Johnson-Obaseki S. Base of the tongue hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma: Case report and literature review. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023;11:2050313X231209670. doi: 10.1177/2050313X231209670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O'Sullivan-Mejia ED, Massey HD, Faquin WC, Powers CN. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma: Report of eight cases and a review of literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:179–185. doi: 10.1007/s12105-009-0124-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Suzuki H, Katoh A, Udaka T, Shiomori T, Fujimura T, Fujimura K, Kitamura T. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma arising from the base of the tongue. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126:653–656. doi: 10.1080/00016480500452509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao S, Zhu Y, Pan MH, Hua HJ, Yang QY, Li X, Li H. Clinicopathologic features of head and neck salivary gland-type clear cell carcinoma. J Chin J Pathol. 2022;51:494–499. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20211117-00837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Toper MH, Sarioglu S. Molecular pathology of salivary gland neoplasms: Diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive perspective. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021;28:81–93. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kaur K, Mehta S, Vanik S, Trivedi P, Banerjee N, Dhar H, Datta S, Karanjai S. The evolving role of molecular pathology in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumours with potential pitfalls. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279:3769–3783. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07326-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pei J, Flieder DB, Patchefsky A, Talarchek JN, Cooper HS, Testa JR, Wei S. Detecting MYB and MYBL1 fusion genes in tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma by targeted RNA-sequencing. Mod Pathol. 2019;32:1416–1420. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0277-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hirose K, Usami Y, Kohara M, Sato S, Iwamoto Y, Murakami S, Uchihashi T, Oya K, Fukuda Y, Hori Y, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of palatal minor salivary gland harboring a novel EWSR1-ATF1 fusion gene: report of a case and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2021;15:676–681. doi: 10.1007/s12105-020-01211-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nojima S, Kohara M, Harada H, Kajikawa H, Hirose K, Nakatsuka SI, Nakagawa Y, Oya K, Fukuda Y, Matsunaga K, et al. Clear cell carcinoma in the oral cavity with three novel types of EWSR1-ATF1 translocation: A case report. Head Neck Pathol. 2022;16:560–566. doi: 10.1007/s12105-021-01356-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Skalova A, Leivo I, Hellquist H, Simpson RHW, Vander Poorten V, Willems SM, Mosaieby E, Slouka D, Ferlito A. Clear cell neoplasms of salivary glands: A diagnostic challenge. Adv Anat Pathol. 2022;29:217–226. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dragoescu E, Jackson-Cook C, Domson G, Massey D, Foster WC. Small cell osteosarcoma with Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 gene rearrangement detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013;17:377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ariasi C, Romanò C, Ghini I, Licata G, Rubelli L, Artelli GL, Calzavara-Pinton P, Arisi M. Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma with positive CD34 immunohistochemical staining: An unusual tumor and a challenging diagnosis. Dermatopathology (Basel) 2023;10:259–265. doi: 10.3390/dermatopathology10030034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Krystel-Whittemore M, Taylor MS, Rivera M, Lennerz JK, Le LP, Dias-Santagata D, Iafrate AJ, Deshpande V, Chebib I, Nielsen GP, et al. Novel and established EWSR1 gene fusions and associations identified by next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Pathol. 2019;93:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fukuda H, Kato I, Furuya M, Tanaka R, Takagi T, Kondo T, Nagashima Y. A novel partner of TFE3 in the Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma: Clinicopathological analyses and detection of EWSR1-TFE3 fusion. Virchows Arch. 2019;474:389–393. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2509-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vergara-Lluri ME, Stohr BA, Puligandla B, Brenholz P, Horvai AE. A novel sarcoma with dual differentiation: Clinicopathologic and molecular characterization of a combined synovial sarcoma and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1093–1098. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31824cd174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sidiropoulos M, Busam K, Guitart J, Laskin WB, Wagner AM, Gerami P. Superficial paramucosal clear cell sarcoma of the soft parts resembling melanoma in a 13-year-old boy. J Cutan Pathol. 2013;40:265–268. doi: 10.1111/cup.12058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Atkins MB, Tannir NM. Current and emerging therapies for first-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;70:127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pfister DG, Spencer S, Adelstein D, Adkins D, Anzai Y, Brizel DM, Bruce JY, Busse PM, Caudell JJ, Cmelak AJ, et al. Head and neck cancers, version 2.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18:873–898. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Desai A, Faquin WC, Iafrate AJ, Rivera MN, Jaquinet A, Troulis MJ. Clear cell carcinoma: A comprehensive literature review of 254 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51:705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang B, Brandwein M, Gordon R, Robinson R, Urken M, Zarbo RJ. Primary salivary clear cell tumors-a diagnostic approach: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 20 patients with clear cell carcinoma, clear cell myoepithelial carcinoma, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:676–685. doi: 10.5858/2002-126-0676-PSCCTA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jin R, Craddock KJ, Irish JC, Perez-Ordonez B, Weinreb I. Recurrent hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of the base of tongue with high-grade transformation and EWSR1 gene rearrangement by FISH. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6:389–394. doi: 10.1007/s12105-012-0338-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Newman WC, Williams L, Duvvuri U, Clump DA, II, Amankulor N. Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma with biopsy-proven spinal metastasis: Case report and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2016;90:699.e7–699.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.






