Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1986 Nov;380:311–328. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016287

Intrinsic reflexes underlying peristalsis in the small intestine of the domestic fowl.

J P Hodgkiss
PMCID: PMC1182939  PMID: 3612565

Abstract

Peristalsis in the chicken small intestine was studied using either a modified Trendelenburg method or a technique in which changes in circular muscle activity were recorded in response to application of a localized radial distension. A localized radial distension had no effect on either the resting tension or the spontaneous activity of the circular muscle on the oral side of distension. On the aboral side of the distension a transient contraction was recorded in the ileum and jejunum after a mean delay of 2.74 s at 37 degrees C. In about a third of the preparations a tonic contraction was also present which persisted for as long as distension was maintained. The transient contraction was blocked by hyoscine (0.6-2.3 microM) and hexamethonium (275 microM); whereas the tonic contraction persisted in the presence of hyoscine. Both types of contraction were blocked by tetrodotoxin (0.31 microM). No such responses were recorded in the duodenum. The descending excitatory reflex responses were followed in all preparations by a fall in the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous contractions and in a few preparations by a concomitant fall in the tone of the circular muscle lasting for up to 3 min. This inhibitory component of the descending reflex was not blocked by guanethidine (3-10 microM). The transient contraction, which originated most frequently at the site of distension, always propagated aborally at a mean speed of 14.2 mm s-1. Surgical interruption of the longitudinal muscle and myenteric plexus effectively blocked the transmission of the excitatory and inhibitory components of the descending reflex past the site of the lesion. In the modified Trendelenburg apparatus raising the intraluminal pressure elicited peristalsis in the isolated ileum. Peristaltic contractions never started at the most oral end of the preparation but appeared instead at any other point on the ileum. This resulted in several contractions contributing to each emptying cycle. Peristalsis was blocked by tetrodotoxin (0.31 microM). These results are discussed in the terms of the organization of the descending reflex. It is suggested that within the enteric nervous system of the ileum and jejunum of the chicken, there are cholinergic and non-cholinergic excitatory neurones and non-adrenergic inhibitory neurones. The results of this study demonstrate that neurogenic peristalsis in the avian small intestine does not conform to the 'law of the intestine' as originally postulated by Bayliss & Starling (1899).

Full text

PDF
311

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams W. B., Levitan I. B. Voltage and ion dependences of the slow currents which mediate bursting in Aplysia neurone R15. J Physiol. 1985 Mar;360:69–93. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr L., Berger W., Dewey M. M. Electrical transmission at the nexus between smooth muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Mar;51(3):347–368. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartlet A. L. Myogenic peristalsis in isolated preparations of chicken oesophagus. Br J Pharmacol. 1973 May;48(1):36–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb08220.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayliss W. M., Starling E. H. The movements and innervation of the small intestine. J Physiol. 1899 May 11;24(2):99–143. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1899.sp000752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayliss W. M., Starling E. H. The movements and innervation of the small intestine. J Physiol. 1901 Feb 28;26(3-4):125–138. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1901.sp000827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayliss W. M., Starling E. H. The movements and the innervation of the large intestine. J Physiol. 1900 Dec 31;26(1-2):107–118. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1900.sp000825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa M., Furness J. B. The peristaltic reflex: an analysis of the nerve pathways and their pharmacology. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1976 Jul;294(1):47–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00692784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daniel E. E., Daniel V. P., Duchon G., Garfield R. E., Nichols M., Malhotra S. K., Oki M. Is the nexus necessary for cell-to-cell coupling of smooth muscle? J Membr Biol. 1976 Aug 26;28(2-3):207–239. doi: 10.1007/BF01869698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duke G. E. Gastrointestinal motility and its regulation. Poult Sci. 1982 Jul;61(7):1245–1256. doi: 10.3382/ps.0611245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Furness J. B., Costa M. The participation of enteric inhibitory nerves in accommodation of the intestine to distension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1977 Jan-Feb;4(1):37–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1977.tb02375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gabella G. Detection of nerve cells by a histochemical technic. Experientia. 1969 Feb 15;25(2):218–219. doi: 10.1007/BF01899135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gabella G. Structure of the musculature of the chicken small intestine. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1985;171(2):139–149. doi: 10.1007/BF00341408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hirst G. D., Holman M. E., McKirdy H. C. Two descending nerve pathways activated by distension of guinea-pig small intestine. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(1):113–127. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirst G. D. Mechanisms of peristalsis. Br Med Bull. 1979 Sep;35(3):263–268. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodgkiss J. P. Peristalsis and antiperistalsis in the chicken caecum are myogenic. Q J Exp Physiol. 1984 Jan;69(1):161–170. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1984.sp002777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KOSTERLITZ H. W., PIRIE V. W., ROBINSON J. A. The mechanism of the peristaltic reflex in the isolated guinea-pig ileum. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):681–694. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackenna B. R., McKirdy H. C. Peristalsis in the rabbit distal colon. J Physiol. 1972 Jan;220(1):33–54. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. North R. A. Electrophysiology of the enteric nervous system. Neuroscience. 1982 Feb;7(2):315–325. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90269-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Turk D. E. The anatomy of the avian digestive tract as related to feed utilization. Poult Sci. 1982 Jul;61(7):1225–1244. doi: 10.3382/ps.0611225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yokoyama S., Ozaki T. Functions of Auerbach's plexus. Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai Zasshi. 1978 Dec;14(4):173–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES