Abstract
Background
Population‐scale databases majorly contribute to variant interpretation. The recently released Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) v4 offers a >5‐fold increased sample size compared to v2.1.1. Pathogenic variants absent from v2.1.1 are now registered in v4 at a considerable rate. The implications on variant interpretation in dystonia are unknown.
Methods
All curated variants linked to the most common dominant forms of isolated dystonia were extracted from the International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Society Gene database. We compared variant population‐frequencies and gene constraint metrics between gnomAD v2.1.1 and v4.
Results
The majority of dystonia‐causing variants (192/247, 77.7%) remained absent from the newer gnomAD version. Of 219 variants absent from v2.1.1, 27 (12.3%) appeared for the first time in v4.1, including well‐established pathogenic alleles. Gene constraints for GNAL and KMT2B significantly decreased in v4.
Conclusions
A growing number of dystonia‐linked alleles are seen in gnomAD v4. The presence in population‐scale data does not preclude pathogenicity. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Keywords: allele frequency, dystonia, gnomAD, KMT2B, variant interpretation
Population databases majorly contribute to variant interpretation in medical genetics. 1 The absence of a variant among population controls supports its pathogenicity (moderate criterion “PM2” in the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics [ACMG] guidelines). 2 Moreover, a significantly higher prevalence of a variant in affected individuals compared with controls can be used as “strong” evidence for pathogenicity according to the ACMG “PS4” criterion. 2 The evaluation of variant frequencies in publicly available population databases has been widely adopted into clinical evidence‐based frameworks and aims to reduce subjectivity in variant classification.
Despite these recommended applications, challenges are associated with the use of large‐scale reference genetic data for the assessment of variants that were identified in patients with dystonia. In particular, the use of stringent frequency cutoffs (eg, requiring the absence of a variant from controls) can increase the risk of falsely categorizing a disease‐causing alteration as benign or as variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Variants causing monogenic dystonia can be found in population datasets for different reasons. First, reduced penetrance, a phenomenon well known for many forms of monogenic dystonia, may result in the enrolment of asymptomatic individuals with pathogenic variation in control cohorts. 3 Second, movement abnormalities can manifest late in life, raising the possibility that individuals harboring an underlying genetic predisposition may be included as controls before symptom onset. Third, variable expressivity may result in mild phenotypes, which can remain undiagnosed in large population cohorts. Fourth, subjects included in population databases may not have been properly phenotyped for the trait of interest.
One of the largest and most commonly queried resources, the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), is updated periodically. A new gnomAD release was launched in November 2023, v4 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). This v4 version of gnomAD (meanwhile accessible as v4.1) contains sequencing data from 807,162 individuals (730,947 exomes and 76,215 genomes), a more than 5‐fold increase in genomic information compared with the previous v2.1.1 release, which had become commonplace in diagnostic practice. Pathogenic variants, often absent from v2.1.1, are now registered in gnomAD at a considerable rate; for example, 14 different ClinVar‐annotated (likely) pathogenic loss‐of‐function (LoF) changes in the neurodevelopmental disease‐ and dystonia‐associated gene CHD8 are found in 28 gnomAD‐v4 subjects, as compared with two such variants (in one individual each) in v2.1.1. We recently made the unexpected observation of a patient with dystonia who had a probable clinically relevant de novo variant of extreme rarity according to v2.1.1, but which was later found to display an allele frequency “greater than expected” for a rare disorder in gnomAD v4.1. 4 This finding motivated us to explore the impact of the newly provided genomic information in gnomAD on variant analysis in dystonia. To this purpose, we systematically screened gnomAD v2.1.1 and v4.1 for variants described in genes linked to autosomal dominant forms of isolated dystonia based on curated data provided through the International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Society Gene Database (MDSGene). 5
Methods
We catalogued all MDSGene‐reported variants (https://www.mdsgene.org/g4d) related to six genes known to cause autosomal dominantly inherited isolated dystonia (ANO3, GNAL, KMT2B, TOR1A, THAP1, and VPS16). We considered all the variants irrespectively of their presentation with additional non‐dystonia features (eg, intellectual disability in the setting of KMT2B and VPS16 variants). Each entry was cross‐referenced with ClinVar. Variants classified as (likely) benign according to ClinVar as well as synonymous variants were excluded. For each gene, we obtained variant observed/expected ratios, LoF observed/expected upper bound fraction (LOEUF) score, as well as probability of being loss‐of‐function intolerant (pLI) and missense z scores from gnomAD versions v2.1.1 and v4.1. We collected the frequencies of each reported variant in both gnomAD versions along with the scores of the following in silico tools: combined annotation dependent depletion (CADD) and rare exome variant ensemble learner (REVEL). Fisher's exact or χ 2 tests were applied as appropriate to compare constraint metrics and variant frequencies in the two gnomAD versions. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Study related data are publicly available.
Results
From the MDSGene database, 247 variants fulfilled the inclusion criteria (as of March 2024). Of these variants, 26 (10.5%) were found in ClinVar (March 2024). Thirteen variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (13/247, 5.3%; from now on referred to as “P/LP”), nine were classified as VUS (9/247, 3.6%), and four variants had conflicting interpretations (4/247, 1.6%).
Twenty‐eight variants (28/247, 11.3%) were already listed in v2.1 (see Table 1). Six of these variants displayed a significant allele frequency decrease in v4.1, whereas two of them displayed an increased frequency in v4.1 as compared with v2.1. The remaining 20 variants showed no significant changes in allele frequencies between v2.1 and v4.1.
TABLE 1.
Frequency comparison of the MDSGene database variants reported already in v2.1 [Color table can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
| c.DNA | Protein | ClinVar classification | CADD | REVEL | Frequency v2.1 | Frequency v4.1 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANO3 | |||||||
| c.1969G>A | p.Ala657Thr | Likely pathogenic | 26.5 | 0.472 | 0.00000399 | 0.00000685 | 1.0 |
| c.2586G>T | p.Lys862Asn | Pathogenic | 16.6 | 0.039 | 0.00000399 | 0.00001302 | 0.3489 |
| c.2497A>G | p.Ile833Val | 21.0 | 0.096 | 0.00001593 | 0.00000930 | 0.3116 | |
| c.2917G>C | p.Gly973Arg | 28.7 | 0.385 | 0.00001065 | 0.00000930 | 0.7426 | |
| c.982>T | p.Arg328Cys | 24.7 | 0.155 | 0.00005171 | 0.00001984 | 0.0067 | |
| GNAL | |||||||
| c.44G>A | p.Gly15Asp | 0.836 | 0.266 | 0.00004287 | 0.00002295 | 0.0680 | |
| KMT2B | |||||||
| c.5336G>A | p.Arg1779Gln | Not provided | 28.9 | 0.567 | 0.00000402 | 0.00000124 | 0.3498 |
| THAP1 | |||||||
| c.407A>G | p.Asn136Ser | 23.9 | 0.462 | 0.00001591 | 0.00002107 | 0.8121 | |
| c.506G>A | p.Arg169Gln | VUS | 23.9 | 0.316 | 0.00001193 | 0.00001300 | 1.0 |
| c.395T>C | p.Phe132Ser | VUS | 21.5 | 0.506 | 0.00001591 | 0.00004027 | 0.0752 |
| c.−42C>T | 20.7 | 0.00000399 | 0.00003174 | 0.0077 | |||
| c.86G>A | p.Arg29Gln | 28.6 | 0.883 | 0.00000398 | 0.00000274 | 0.5476 | |
| c.238A>G | p.Ile80Val | VUS | 16.6 | 0.610 | 0.00002784 | 0.00001984 | 0.4761 |
| c.496G>A | p.Ala166Thr | 20.1 | 0.410 | 0.00002386 | 0.00001611 | 0.4319 | |
| c.−32C>T | 17.9 | 0.00001199 | 0.00000372 | 0.1091 | |||
| c.427A>G | p.Met143Val | VUS | 18.9 | 0.436 | 0.00005656 | 0.00003593 | 0.1044 |
| c.521A>G | p.Glu174Gly | 28.5 | 0.541 | 0.00000795 | 0.00000318 | 0.0900 | |
| c.50A>G | p.Asp17Gly | 25.9 | 0.731 | 0.00002802 | 0.00001574 | 0.1913 | |
| TOR1A | |||||||
| c.863G>A | p.Arg288Gln | Pathogenic | 23.0 | 0.387 | 0.00009191 | 0.00009541 | 1.0 |
| c.962C>T | p.Thr321Met | VUS | 25.9 | 0.53 | 0.00001061 | 0.00007001 | <0.0001 |
| c.907_909delGAG | p.Glu303del | Pathogenic | 19.5 | 0.00010605 | 0.00005204 | 0.0014 | |
| c.934A>G | p.Arg312Gly | 21.9 | 0.183 | 0.00000398 | 0.00000342 | 1.0 | |
| c.823A>G | p.Lys275Glu | Conflicting interpretation | 23.5 | 0.07 | 0.00043481 | 0.00026392 | <0.0001 |
| c.385G>A | p.Val129Ile | VUS | 26.1 | 0.369 | 0.00006717 | 0.00002602 | 0.0017 |
| VPS16 | |||||||
| c.692A>G | p.Tyr231Cys | 23.9 | 0.406 | 0.00004772 | 0.00000991 | 0.0001 | |
| c.156C>A | p.Asn52Lys | Pathogenic | 18.8 | 0.096 | 0.00024778 | 0.00007435 | <0.0001 |
| c.1903C>T | p.Arg635* | Conflicting interpretation | 37.0 | 0.00000402 | 0.00000256 | 0.5640 | |
| c.1939C>T | p.Arg647* | Conflicting interpretation | 39.0 | 0.00000402 | 0.00000310 | 0.5772 |
Significant changes in allele frequency in v4.1 are marked in bold; the blue and red shading indicate a decrease or an increase in allele frequency, respectively. Italics indicates gene names.
Abbreviations: MDSGene, International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Society Gene Database; CADD, Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion; REVEL, Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner; VUS: variant of uncertain significance.
Of 219 variants not listed in v2.1, 27 (27/219, 12.3%) appeared for the first time in v4.1 (see Table 2). Although most of these variants occurred at an absolute allele number of n = 1 in v4.1, six of them (3 in KMT2B, 2 in ANO3, and 1 in VPS16) were found in ≥4 individuals.
TABLE 2.
MDSGene database variants listed for the first time in gnomAD v4.1
| c.DNA | Protein | ClinVar classification | Allele count/allele number 4.1 | Frequency v4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANO3 | ||||
| c.860G>A | p.Arg287Gln | 5/1603422 | 0.00000312 | |
| c.674A>G | p.Asn225Ser | 4/1607382 | 0.00000249 | |
| c.835T>A | p.Tyr279Asn | 1/833108 | 0.00000120 | |
| c.702C>G | p.Cys234Trp | VUS | 1/1458066 | 0.00000069 |
| c.1943A>G | p.Asn648Ser | Likely pathogenic | 1/833000 | 0.00000120 |
| c.2540A>G | p.Tyr847Cys | 1/1613556 | 0.00000062 | |
| c.1480A>T | p.Arg494Trp | Pathogenic | 2/1564666 | 0.00000128 |
| KMT2B | ||||
| c.3325_3325delC | p.Arg1109Glufs*73 | Likely pathogenic | 1/1436868 | 0.00000070 |
| c.3431A>T | p.Asp1144Val | 1/826814 | 0.00000121 | |
| c.3596_3697insC | p.Met1202Aspfs*22 | 2/1430130 | 0.00000140 | |
| c.521dupC a | p.Thr176Aspfs*8 | Pathogenic | 11/1460836 | 0.00000753 |
| c.3325dupC | p.Arg1109Profs*4 | 2/1436898 | 0.00000139 | |
| c.2210T>C | p.Leu737Pro | VUS | 7/1459534 | 0.00000480 |
| c.4622C>T | p.Ala1541Val | Not provided | 2/833098 | 0.00000240 |
| c.6413_6414dupC a | p.Ala2139Glyfs*6 | Pathogenic | 4/1452802 | 0.00000275 |
| THAP1 | ||||
| c.11C>T | p.Ser4Phe | Pathogenic | 1/833110 | 0.00000120 |
| c.570delA | p. Asp191Thrfs*9 | 1/628476 | 0.00000159 | |
| c.5T>G | p.Val2Gly | 1/833110 | 0.00000120 | |
| c.410A> | p.Tyr137Cys | 1/1614142 | 0.00000062 | |
| c.7C>T | p.Gln3* | Pathogenic | 1/1461488 | 0.00000068 |
| c.17C>T | p.Ser6Phe | 2/833110 | 0.00000240 | |
| c.77C>G | p.Pro26Arg | 1/1461640 | 0.00000068 | |
| c.236delC | p.Thr79Lysfs*41 | 2/833110 | 0.00000240 | |
| c.266A>G | p.Lys89Arg | VUS | 2/1613934 | 0.00000124 |
| TOR1A | ||||
| c.692T>A | p.Ile231Asn | 1/1614220 | 0.00000062 | |
| VPS16 | ||||
| c.1988_1989insG | p.Asn663Lysfs*2 | Likely pathogenic | 1/1614198 | 0.00000062 |
| c.559C>T | p.Arg187* | Conflicting interpretation | 6/1461724 | 0.00000410 |
Abbreviations: MDSGene, International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Society Gene Database; gnomAD, Genome Aggregation Database; VUS: variant of uncertain significance.
Filtered out because of poor quality in gnomAD v2.1.
Considering the 13 P/LP variants from ClinVar, 8 (8/13, 62%) appeared for the first time in v4.1 (0 count in v2.1). Of the five P/LP variants already reported in v2.1, two displayed a decreased frequency in v4.1.
Regarding constraint metrics, GNAL exhibited a significant lower constraint against both LoF and missense variants in v4.1 compared with v2.1.1 (see Supplementary Table S1). The constraint of KMT2B against missense variants also significantly decreased in v4.1 compared with v2.1.1 (see Supplementary Table S2). Gene‐specific changes in variant frequencies are discussed below.
ANO3
Of 25 MDSGene‐curated variants, seven (28%) appeared for the first time in v4.1 (see Table 1), two of which were classified as P/LP in ClinVar. Of the five variants already reported in v2.1 (5/25, 20%), one displayed a decreased frequency in v4.1. The remaining 13 variants (52%) were not reported in v2.1 or v4.1.
GNAL
Of 34 variants listed in MDSGene, one was already reported in v2.1 and displayed a reduced frequency in v4.1. The remaining 33 variants (97%) were not reported in v2.1 and v4.1.
KMT2B
Of 67 variants from MDSGene, eight (11.8%) appeared for the first time in v4.1. Five of these were frameshift LoF variants. Notably, the LoF variant p.Thr176Aspfs*8 had an absolute allele count of 11 in v4.1. Inspection of next‐generation sequencing read data in gnomAD revealed that eight of 11 datasets had a depth of coverage of <20 at this site (read depth 12–19; variant called in 3–5 reads), whereas two of 11 datasets with a corresponding sequencing depth of >20 presented the variant in 20% of reads only, potentially indicative of mosaic events. Another LoF variant (p.Ala2139Glyfs*6) was also present in four carriers in v4.1; visualization of gnomAD sequencing data showed that the depth of coverage was <20 in all four subjects, with four or less reads affected. One missense variant already present in v2.1 showed no relevant frequency change in v4.1. The remaining 58 variants (86.6%) were not reported in v2.1 and v4.1.
THAP1
Nine of 94 MDSGene‐listed THAP1 variants absent from v2.1 were now reported in v4.1, two of which were classified as P/LP in ClinVar. Of the 11 variants already present in v2.1, one displayed an increased frequency in v4.1 (absolute carrier number n = 51 in v4.1 vs. n = 1 in v2.1). The remaining 74 variants (78.7%) were not found in v2.1 and v4.1.
TOR1A
Nine TOR1A variants were reported in MDSGene. Of these, one appeared for the first time in v4.1. Of the six variants already present in v2.1, one displayed an increased and three a decreased frequency in v4.1. The only well‐established disease‐causing variant (p.Glu303del) displayed an approximately 2‐fold frequency decrease in v4.1 compared with v2.1.
VPS16
Two of 18 variants appeared for the first time in v4.1. One was a P/LP frameshift LoF variant described in ClinVar. Four variants were already reported in v2.1: two with conflicting interpretations in ClinVar displayed no change in frequency, whereas the other two (1 P/LP; 1 unreported in ClinVar) displayed a reduced frequency in v4.1. The remaining 12 variants (66%) were not reported in v2.1 or v4.1.
Discussion
Although the ACMG guidelines contain two important criteria to support the pathogenicity of a variant based on its population frequency (“PS4” and “PM2”), there are often no specific recommendations for defining the expected (or “allowed”) carrier cutoff of the variant in the context of an individual clinical disorder. 2 For example, rare variants associated with pediatric‐onset diseases are expected to be depleted from population‐based databases. Nevertheless, the most common variant causing childhood‐onset generalized dystonia (TOR1A p.Glu303del) is recurrently found in gnomAD subjects (n = 84 in v4.1). Frequency‐based filtering of variants is a key step for identifying monogenic disease variation from next‐generation sequencing data. Indeed, the absence of a variant among population controls (PM2 criterion) is sufficient to upgrade a variant from VUS to likely pathogenic and the other way around. 2 Therefore, detailed knowledge about the allele count of variants linked to disorders such as dystonia in the general population is crucial. The v4.1 update of gnomAD is considered to provide more accurate frequency estimates based on a considerable increase in sample size. Therefore, for variant interpretation by the genetics community, the impact of new carrier rates of currently considered disease‐causing variants on clinical diagnostics needs to be determined. Here, we comprehensively assessed the carrier rates of variants reported to cause isolated dystonia based on the MDSGene database according to the v2.1.1 and v4 gnomAD releases. Three core observations emerged from our evaluation. First, the majority (77.7%) of presumably dystonia‐linked variants from MDSGene remained absent from gnomAD. This finding indicates that a relevant proportion of variants causing monogenic dystonia are ultra‐rare or “private” alterations yet unobservable in a large sample size of population controls. Second, for many variants already listed in gnomAD v2.1.1, the v4 update did not result in a statistically significant change in allele frequencies, or at least not in an increased prevalence. Rather, a few dystonia‐causing variants from MDSGene showed a decreased population frequency in v4 (eg, TOR1A p.Glu303del). This might be attributable to the inclusion of additional cohorts of European ancestry, such as the UK Biobank dataset, in which certain variants are less prevalent than in other populations (eg, the TOR1A p.Glu303del variant being most prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews 6 ). Third, a non‐neglectable number of variants listed in MDSGene, including many that were cross‐referenced as P/LP alterations in ClinVar, appeared for the first time in gnomAD v4. This notion reinforces the conclusion that the (rare) presence of a variant in gnomAD does not indicate that it is benign. We also noted unexpected carrier rates for KMT2B LoF variants in gnomAD v4 (eg, for p.Thr176Aspfs*8; 11 carriers) which has previously been discovered as a de novo event in early‐onset neurodevelopmental dystonia. 7 A closer examination of the gnomAD data suggested the presence of sequencing artifacts or mosaic states as possible explanations for some of these relatively high allele counts, adding further layers of complexity to variant interpretation using large‐scale sequencing data. To overcome the intrinsic challenges of variant analysis with the use of DNA sequencing‐level data alone, the implementation of additional markers for pathogenicity analysis will be a promising strategy. An example is the analysis of genome‐wide methylation profiles from blood‐extracted DNA to assess the consequences of variants in KMT2B, 8 including alterations with moderate‐to‐low effect sizes. Interestingly, the KMT2B missense variant p.Ala1541Val, unreported in gnomAD v2.1.1 but present in two carriers in v4, was shown to cause more subtle methylation changes in a family with incompletely penetrant dystonia. 8 , 9
In summary, we provide a systematic assessment of population frequencies of documented dystonia‐causing variants to continue improving the interpretability of variants identified in affected individuals. We found that a sizable portion of dystonia‐linked variants now appear in the recently released v4 version of gnomAD, highlighting a role for variable penetrance and expressivity mechanisms and underlining the importance of further research into the prevalence and effects of rare variants carried by patients with dystonia.
Financial Disclosures
C.K. reports consultancies from Centogene, Takeda; received honoraria from Desitin and Bial; and had advisory board activity for Retromer Therapeutics.
Author Roles
(1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Execution, C. Statistical analysis; (2) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.
E.I.: 1A, 2A, 2C.
A.E.: 1B, 2B.
S.B.: 1A, 2B.
L.M.L.: 2B.
K.L.: 2B.
C.K.: 2B.
M.Z.: 1A, 2B.
Supporting information
Data S1. Supporting Information.
Acknowledgments
Several authors are members of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN‐RND) (project ID 739510). E.I. acknowledges support from the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP‐RD WP17 research mobility fellowship). This work was supported by funding from the EJP RD (EJP RD Joint Transnational Call 2022) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Bonn, Germany), awarded to the project PreDYT (Predictive Biomarkers In Dystonia, 01GM2302). This research was also supported by a “Schlüsselprojekt” grant from the Else Kröner‐Fresenius‐Stiftung (2022_EKSE.185). In addition, this study (to M.Z.) has received funding from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the Free State of Bavaria under the Excellence Strategy of the Federal Government and the Länder, as well as by the Technical University of Munich—Institute for Advanced Study. M.Z. receives research support from the German Research Foundation (DFG 458949627; ZE 1213/2‐1). C.K. receives research support from the German Research Foundation (DFG), The Michael J. Fox Foundation, and Aligning Science Across Parkinson's Initiative. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: The authors declare that there are no funding sources or conflicts of interest to report related to this work.
Funding agency: The authors declare that there are no funding sources to this work.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in gnomAD at https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/. as well as at https://www.mdsgene.org/.
References
- 1. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alfoldi J, Wang Q, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020;581(7809):434–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier‐Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17(5):405–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lange LM, Gonzalez‐Latapi P, Rajalingam R, Tijssen MAJ, Ebrahimi‐Fakhari D, Gabbert C, et al. Nomenclature of genetic movement disorders: recommendations of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society task force: an update. Mov Disord 2022;37(5):905–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Indelicato E, Romito LM, Harrer P, Golfre Andreasi N, Colangelo I, Kopajtich R, et al. Genome aggregation database version 4‐new challenges of variant analysis in movement disorders. Mov Disord 2024;39(7):1237–1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lange LM, Junker J, Loens S, Baumann H, Olschewski L, Schaake S, et al. Genotype‐phenotype relations for isolated dystonia genes: MDSGene systematic review. Mov Disord 2021;36(5):1086–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Park J, Damrauer SM, Baras A, Reid JG, Overton JD, Gonzalez‐Alegre P. Epidemiology of DYT1 dystonia: estimating prevalence via genetic ascertainment. Neurol Genet 2019;5(5):e358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hackenberg A, Wagner M, Pahnke J, Zeitler P, Boltshauser E. Low voice, spasmodic dysphonia, and hand dystonia as clinical clues for KMT2B‐associated early‐onset dystonia. Neuropediatrics 2018;49(5):356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mirza‐Schreiber N, Zech M, Wilson R, Brunet T, Wagner M, Jech R, et al. Blood DNA methylation provides an accurate biomarker of KMT2B‐related dystonia and predicts onset. Brain 2022;145(2):644–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zech M, Jech R, Havrankova P, Fecikova A, Berutti R, Urgosik D, et al. KMT2B rare missense variants in generalized dystonia. Mov Disord 2017;32(7):1087–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1. Supporting Information.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in gnomAD at https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/. as well as at https://www.mdsgene.org/.
