ABSTRACT
Sexual reproduction and recruitment enhance the genetic diversity and evolution of reef-building corals for population recovery and coral reef conservation under climate change. However, new recruits are vulnerable to physical changes and the mechanisms of symbiosis establishment remain poorly understood. Here, Dipsastraea veroni, a broadcast spawning hermaphrodite reef-building coral, was subjected to settlement and juvenile growth in flow-through in situ seawater at 27.93 ± 0.96°C. Symbiosis of Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria, and/or archaea by horizontal acquisition and/or hypothetical vertical transmission through the mucus with symbionts from the parent appears to be a heritable process of selection and adaptation in D. veroni at the egg, larva, juvenile (5 days post settlement, d p.s. and 32 d p.s.) stages. Symbiodiniaceae was dominated by the genera Cladocopium, Durusdinium, Symbiodinium, with increasing relative abundance of Durusdinium at 5 d p.s. and Symbiodinium at 32 d p.s. Mixed acquisition of the dominant phyla Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Cyanobacteriota, Bacillota, Planctomycetota, and Actinomycetota in egg, larva, and/or juvenile showed a winnowing and regulated bacterial diversity and dynamics, resulting in stage-abundant orders Pseudomonadales and Bacillales in egg and Rhodobacterales, Rhodospirillales, Cyanobacteria, and Cyanobacteriales in larva and/or juvenile. The photoautotrophic Chloroflexales, Cyanobacteriales, and Chlorobiales were abundant in adults. The stable archaeal community contained predominant Crenarchaeota, Halobacterota, Nanoarchaeia Thermoplasmatota, and eight rare phyla, with increased relative abundance of the genera Bathyarchaeota, Candidatus_Nitrosopumilus, Candidatus_Nitrocosmicus, Nitrosarchaeum, Candidatus_Nitrosotenuis, Candidatus_Nitrosopelagicus, Cenarchaeum, Haladaptatus, Halogranum, Halolamina, and Woesearchaeales and GW2011-AR15 in juveniles. All results revealed flexible symbiotic mechanisms in D. veroni during early ontogeny for coral survival and evolution.
IMPORTANCE
Flexible symbioses of Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria, and archaea appear to be a heritable process of selection and adaptation in Dipsastraea veroni in the field, benefiting early coral development and facilitating coral population recovery and reef conversation.
KEYWORDS: sexual reproduction, scleractinian coral, Dipsastraea veroni, early life stage, horizontal acquisition, vertical transmission
INTRODUCTION
Coral reefs, one of the world’s most productive and biodiverse ecosystems, have been severely degraded due to climate change and anthropogenic disturbance (1, 2). Rapid declines in the cover of scleractinian corals, which form the framework of coral reefs and their diversity, have resulted in 19% loss and 35% severe damage to the world’s coral reefs (3) although a 2% recovery has been observed (4). Coral reef restoration requires the coral sexual reproduction and recruitment (5–7) and symbiosis with Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria, and archaea (8–10).
Sexual reproduction and recruitment are key processes for the maintenance and evolutionary adaptation of coral populations and the persistence of coral reef ecosystems (6, 11, 12). Sexual reproduction introduces offspring with genetic variation (13, 14) to replenish depleted adult populations and promote population recovery and evolution. Approximately half of the estimated 900 scleractinian corals have been studied for sexual reproduction (6, 11, 15), but the complex life cycle of the coral holobiont makes it challenging to identify symbiosis establishment and mechanisms during early development and recruitment with high mortality (5, 16).
Coral evolution is also influenced by symbiosis (9, 17). Corals provide a protective environment and essential compounds for symbionts (Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria, and archaea), which are fundamental to coral survival and evolution through energy supply, nutrient transfer, and genetic exchange (12, 17, 18). Symbiodiniaceae, a family of dinoflagellate microalgae that provide photosynthetic energy and/or nutrients via carbon fixation (19, 20), translocate up to 90% of the coral carbon demand (21, 22). Bacteria and archaea are involved in the transfer of trace metals, vitamins and products of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur fixation, and metabolism to corals (8, 23–25) and/or against pathogens (9, 10).
To establish symbiosis, approximately 85% of scleractinian corals exhibit horizontal acquisition (assimilated from the environment) and 15% vertical transmission (inherited from parents) (11). Flexible symbiosis with more dynamic microbial communities through mixed-mode transmission or both simultaneously or in succession allows winnowing (elimination of certain symbionts) for favorable symbionts that may contribute to coral survival and evolution (26–28). Coral surface mucus plays an important role in these beneficial symbioses (29–31).
Dipsastraea, one of the stress-tolerant genera widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific, has persisted (32, 33) and/or recruited to coral reefs under environmental disturbance (34, 35). Among them, Dipsastraea veroni (Moll & Best, 1984), a rare massive reef-building coral on reef slopes, is moderately tolerant and listed as Near Threatened (https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/132894/3481551). In this study, D. veroni larvae from artificial sexual reproduction were settled and metamorphosed into juveniles in flow-through in situ seawater to study the onset and dynamics of symbiosis during early life stages. Community composition and diversity of Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria, and archaea were determined using inter-transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) and 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S rDNA) amplicon sequencing of corals at adult, egg, larva, juvenile 1 (at 5 days post settlement, d p.s.), and juvenile 2 (at 32 d p.s.) stages. The flexible and specific symbiont-host association in D. veroni is critical for early coral development and could facilitate coral population recovery and reef conversation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Spawning event and coral larvae culture
Six gravid colonies of D. veroni (Fig. 1A, ~25 cm in diameter) were collected from 4 to 6 m depth at Luhuitou coral reef (18°12′N, 109°28′E), Sanya Bay, China, on 7 May 2020. They were maintained in flow-through in situ seawater (pumped from ~5 m depth) under natural light-dark cycles (~250 µmol photons per square meter per second at noon) at the Tropical Marine Biological Research Station in Hainan. Live brine shrimp Artemia salina nauplii, which hatched for approximately 36 hours (h), were fed to the corals every night until the corals spawned on 14–16 May (21–23 April, lunar date) (Fig. 1B). Egg-sperm bundles (Fig. 1C) were gently mixed for natural gamete fertilization (Fig. 1D) in in situ seawater filtered through a 5 µm filter bag. The embryos developed into swimming larvae (Fig. 1E), which were temporarily cultured in an aquarium filled with 2,000 L of filtered seawater above.
Fig 1.
Photos of D. veroni at different life stages. (A) Adult D. veroni on the Luhuitou coral reef, Sanya Bay, China. (B) Slow extrusion of egg-sperm bundles in D. veroni. (C) Buoyant egg-sperm bundles. (D) Fertilized eggs (~1 h). (E) Planula larva. (F–H) Juveniles at 2, 5, and 32 d p.s., respectively. Bar = 200 µm.
Experimental setup
Prior to the experiments, 6 aquaria (volume ~90 L, outlet covered with 180 µm mesh) containing 15 cm Petri dishes (10 per aquarium) fixed with Gel-10 glue (Aron Alpha, Japan) were incubated with flow-through (flow rate ~50 mL/min) sand-filtered in situ seawater under natural light-dark cycles for 2 days. Settlement and juvenile growth were performed in these aquaria (mimicking field symbiosis) thermostatically controlled at 27.93 ± 0.96°C (Weipro, China). On 19 May, ~1,000 4-day-old larvae per aquarium were then placed on petri dishes with terracotta tiles (3.6 cm in diameter, field-preconditioned for 2 weeks). Larvae settled and metamorphosed on 21 May (Fig. 1F) when meshes were removed to release unsettled larvae. Juveniles continued to grow for 1 month. Images of eggs and juvenile polyps were taken with a light microscope (SZX7, Olympus, Japan) to count survivorship and measure egg diameter and juvenile surface area (lateral growth) using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) (36).
Sample collection
Adult (18 May, Fig. 1A), egg (15 May, Fig. 1D), larva (19 May, Fig. 1E), juvenile 1 (24 May, Fig. 1G), and juvenile 2 (21 June, Fig. 1H) corals were sampled in triplicate. In detail, a small piece (~2 cm diameter) of polyp tissue was obtained from each adult (two per group) and primary polyp from 80 juveniles in each tank using a sterile scalpel. Approximately 80 eggs and/or larvae were pipetted onto 180 µm mesh for each of the three groups. Meanwhile, three replicates of 2 L of sand-filtered ambient seawater were filtered onto the 0.2 µm polycarbonate membranes as background. All samples were thoroughly washed three times with 0.22 µm filtered seawater, preserved in absolute ethyl alcohol, and stored at −20°C for the following experiment. Adults recovered for days and returned to the original reef.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Three groups of D. veroni eggs or larvae (~60 individuals per group) were washed three times as above and fixed in 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde (Sigma, St.Louis, MO, USA) in 0.22 µm filtered seawater for 2 h at room temperature and ~20 h at 4°C for SEM. Parallel samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde of 0.22 µm filtered seawater as above for TEM. On 12 April, the coral Montipora turgescens spawned the eggs fixed above as a control.
For SEM, samples were washed three times with phosphate buffer (PBS, 30 min/time). Dehydration was performed in a graded series of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, and 100%) for 20 min. Eggs or larvae were incubated with absolute ethanol and desiccated using a critical point dryer (Leica EM CPD300, Germany). After reaching the critical point, 15 individuals per replicate were split with dissecting needles on a copper foil for metallization of gold and platinum conduction using an ion sputtering (E-1010, Hitachi, Japan, 20 Kv). The copper foil was placed on an aluminum stub to visualize the cross section using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-3400N, Japan).
For TEM, samples were washed five times in PBS (15 min/time) and postfixed for 1–2 h in 1% OsO4 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS. After three washes in PBS, eggs or larvae were dehydrated in a graded series of acetone (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) (20 min/time) and 100% acetone (20 min/time, three times), infiltrated in baths mixing acetone with Spurr’s resin in graded proportions (2:1, 1:2) for 3–4 h and 100% resin for 24 h, and embedded in 100% resin using a hot air oven (60°C) for 72 h. Ultrathin sections (50–70 nm) prepared on an Ultracut E microtome UC-7 (Leica, Germany) were placed on copper grids, stained with 5% uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate, and photographed using a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H-7500, Japan).
DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing
Absolute ethyl alcohol was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 15min. Total genomic DNA was extracted from all samples using the Fast DNA SPIN Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sample disruption was performed using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biologicals, USA) for 1 min at a speed of 6 m/s. The eluted DNA was analyzed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with a threshold of 1.8–2.0 for A260/280 and stored at −20°C until amplicon PCR amplification.
Primer pairs ITS2F (5′-GAATTGCAGAACTCCGTG-3′) and ITS2R (5′-GGATCCATATGCTTAAGTTCAGCGGGT-3′) (37), Bac341F (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3′), and Bac802R (5′-TACNVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) (38) were used to amplify the Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 gene and the bacterial 16S rDNA V3-V4 region, respectively. The primer pair SeqF2: 5′-GYMGCCRCGGKAAHAS-3′; SeqR2: 5′-NYRTACTYCCCARGYRG-3′ was designed for the archaeal 16S rDNA V4-V5 region (39). Each primer pair was mixed with the template DNA, Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR conditions consisted of denaturation for 4 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C (bacterial 16S rDNA or Symbiodiniaceae ITS2) or 59°C (archaeal 16S rDNA) and 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension for 5 min at 72°C.
PCR products were purified using the Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) to prepare libraries using the TruSeqDNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified libraries were checked using the Qubit@ 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). Sequencing was then performed on an Illumina NovaSeq platform using 250 bp paired-end reads (Novogene, Beijing).
Data Processing and statistical analysis
Raw data were processed into fastq files using UCHIME (V1.17) (40). Paired-end reads were assigned to samples based on barcodes and assembled into raw tags using FLASH (V1.2.7) (41). After quality filtering with QIIME (42), the clean reads were compared with the modified Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 database (1 , Supplementary information by BLASTN against NCBI database, clade, and subclade were renamed as genus and species) (43, 44) and the Silva database (https://www.arb-silva.de/) (16S rDNA) using UCHIME to remove the chimera sequences. Effective sequences with 97% similarity were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (>2 sequences) using the Uparse software (V7.0.1001) (45). Taxonomic annotation and quantitative analysis of OTUs at the phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species level were performed using the BLASTN against the modified ITS2 database and the Mothur algorithm (46) against the Silva database at 70% confidence.
Relative abundances of OTUs were used for diversity and statistical analyses using QIIME (V1.9.1) and the Vegan package in R software (V2.15.3) (47). Alpha diversity (Richness, Shannon, Chao1, Simpson, ACE, and Good-coverage) was generated to estimate species complexity within the community. Comparative analyses of Richness (species) and Shannon were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A square root-transformed Bray-Curtis dissimilarity based Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) was performed to show the symbiont relationships at different stages. Adonis in Vegan package was used for the permutational multivariate analysis of variance based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity to determine the statistical significance of stage separation and relationships. To identify stage-associated symbionts, relative abundances of symbionts were detected by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe, V1.0), with LDA >4.00 and Wilcoxon rank-sum test P < 0.05 (48) .
All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Tukey’s HSD multiple comparisons in SPSS (26.0) software were performed as post hoc tests when one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with P values < 0.05 detected significant differences in surface area, sequence number, and/or relative abundance of symbionts at different life stages.
RESULTS
Sexual reproduction and early development of D. veroni
D. veroni is a broadcast spawning hermaphrodite coral. Slow extrusion of gamete bundles containing both egg and sperm occurred (Fig. 1B and C) at ~22:30 for approximately 40 min during the sixth to eighth (peak on the seventh) night after the full moon in ambient seawater at 28.36 ± 0.15°C. Eggs were aqua (pale green/blue), pink, and tan (Fig. 1B through D) with a mean diameter of 405.60 ± 4.64 µm (Table S1-1). Each adult produced approximately 500,000 larvae (fertilization ~92%). It took ~48 h for the larvae to settle and metamorphose into juveniles (Fig. 1E and F).
Lateral growth of juveniles was significantly (P = 0.000) faster in the first half of the month (0.34 ± 0.04 mm2) than in the second half (0.08 ± 0.02 mm2) based on the surface areas at 2, 17, and 32 d p.s. (Fig. S1; Table S1-2). Brown Symbiodiniaceae became visible in polyp tentacles at 5 d p.s. (Fig. 1G) and thrived at 32 d p.s. (Fig. 1H) when the survivorship was 90.14 ± 0.04%.
Ultrastructure of eggs and larvae
The surface of eggs and larvae was not smooth but attached with small particles (Fig. 2A, C, and E). All cross sections were occupied by ~5 µm diameter empty spherical spaces, except for the peripheral layer of ~5 µm yolk bodies and/or cortical vesicles (Fig. 2B, D, and F; Fig. S1B). Symbiodiniaceae cells did not appear in D. veroni eggs and larvae (Fig. 2B and D), but in M. Turgescens eggs (Fig. 2F, yellow arrows).
Fig 2.
Scanning electron microscopy of eggs and larvae. (A and B) Surface and cross section of D. veroni egg. (C and D) Surface and cross section of D. veroni larva. (E and F) Spherical M. turgescens egg and its cross section with symbiotic Symbiodiniaceae (yellow arrows). Bar = 100 µm.
Mucus (white arrows) was attached to spermatozoa (magenta arrows, on the surface of the egg), which contained mitochonria (red arrowheads) and flagella (violet arrowheads) (Fig. 3A). D. veroni eggs (Fig. 3B) and larvae (Fig. 3C and D) were full of yolk bodies (green arrowheads) and lipid granules and some mitochondria, but no symbiotic microorganisms and/or Symbiodiniaceae cells (yellow arrows), which were vertically transmitted in M. Turgescens eggs (Fig. 3E and F). Dehydration resulted in the empty spherical spaces in the SEM samples (Fig. 2B, D and F; Fig. S1B) due to the dissolution of lipid granules, which were still visible in the TEM samples due to OxO4 treatment (Fig. 3B through F, orange arrows).
Fig 3.
Transmission electron microscopy of eggs and larvae. (A) Mucus (white arrows) adhering to the egg-sperm bundles (magenta arrows). Mitochonria, red arrowheads; flagella, violet arrowheads. (B) Cross section of D. veroni eggs and larvae. (C and D) Yolk bodies, green arrowheads; lipid granules, orange arrows. (E and F) Symbiotic Symbiodiniaceae cells (yellow arrows) with nucleus (turquoise arrows) and chloroplast (red arrows) vertically transmitted in M. Turgescens eggs. Bar = 2 µm.
Data and sequence information
Eighteen samples were obtained with 72,730 normalized reads (Table S2-1) clustering into 1,054 OTUs blasted to 10 genera in the family Symbiodiniaceae (Table S4-1). For bacterial and archaeal 16S rDNA, there were 39,817 and 27,484 normalized reads (Table S2-1) clustering into 7,732 (Table S4-2) and 9,181 OTUs (Table S4-3), respectively. Bacterial OTUs were annotated to 496 genera in 30 phyla. However, 2,154 archaeal OTUs were actually annotated to 66 genera in 12 phyla (Table S4-3). Sequencing and diversity of all samples reached a plateau based on rarefaction curves, rank-abundance curves (Fig. S2), and goods coverage (>0.96) (Table S2-1).
For Symbiodiniaceae ITS2, both Shannon diversity and richness were significantly higher in seawater than in D. veroni, which differed among stages except for egg and larva (Fig. 4A). For 16S rDNA, bacterial Shannon index was significantly higher in juvenile 2 than others, but similar to juvenile 1, whose richness was significantly higher than others (Fig. 4B), while no significant differences were found in Archaea (Fig. 4C; Table S2-2). PCoA followed this partitioning, with samples clustering into groups in Symbiodiniaceae (Fig. 4A), Bacteria (a clear separation of corals from seawater) (Fig. 4B), and Archeae (Fig. 4C; Tables S2-2 and S3-1).
Fig 4.
Diversity statistics of Shannon index, richness, and PCoA in D.veroni at different life stages. Box plots from left to right represent Shannon diversity, richness, and PCoA visualization based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of OTUs for Symbiodiniaceae (A), Bacteria (B), and Archaea (C). The PCoA axes represent the two synthetic variables that explain most of the variation in the data set. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
In community composition, Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 differed significantly (P < 0.01) between adult and egg, larva and juvenile 1, juvenile 1 and juvenile 2, and egg, larva, or juvenile 1 and seawater. Bacterial 16S rDNA changed significantly between juvenile 2 and other stages, adult and egg or larva, and larva and juvenile 1, while archaeal 16S rDNA was stable among stages (P > 0.05) (Table S3-2).
Specific transmission of Symbiodiniaceae in D. veroni
All groups were dominated by Durusdinium, Cladocopium, and Symbiodinium (Fig. 5A). Consistent with the sequence number (Fig. S1C), the relative abundance of Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 in the adult (95.54%) was significantly higher than that in the egg (44.39%) and larva (46.40%) (Fig. 5A). Adult was associated with Durusdinium (31.48%), Symbiodinium (7.12%), and especially Cladocopium (56.05%), which was significantly higher than egg (12.29%), larva (10.87%), juvenile 1 (1.87%), juvenile 2 (3.88%), and seawater (23.95%). Adult also had rare (<1.00%) Freudenthalidium, Fugacium, and Gerakladium, and Halluxium were lower than seawater. Juvenile 1 and juvenile 2 were rich in Durusdinium (69.59%) and Symbiodinium (46.95%), respectively (Tables S4-1, S5-1 and S5-2).
Fig 5.
Relative abundance of symbionts in D. veroni at different life stages. (A) Symbiodiniaceae at the genus level. (B) Bacteria and (C) Archaea at the phylum level. Others represent the taxa that do not belong to the corresponding symbionts.
In Cladocopium, the stage-abundant GS_C3u, LJ_C2r, GS_C3w in the adult (Fig. S3A) were significantly eliminated in the juvenile (Tables S4-1 and S5-4), and presumably to be horizontal acquisition, which also occurred in GS_A8, GS_I1 and GS_I2. The stage-abundant LD_D17, GS_D6, GS_D2.2 of Durusdinium and GS-A6 and GS-A3 of Symbiodinium, with similar relative abundance in egg and/or larva as in adult, were significantly increased in juvenile 1 and juvenile 2, respectively (Fig. S3A; Tables S4-1, S5-3 through S5-5).
Flexible symbiosis of Bacteria in D. veroni
Bacterial community in D. veroni was different from that in seawater and varied due to flexible symbiosis during early ontogeny (Fig. 5B; Tables S5-1 and S5-2). Horizontal acquisition, likely from seawater, occurred in the phyla Chlorobiota, Deinococcota, Spirochaetota, Fusobacteriota, Pseudomonadota, and Bacillota, the latter two with significantly higher relative abundance in egg (73.38% and 9.88%) than adult (36.59% and 0.42%) and juvenile 1 (39.77% and 0.65%). Phyla present in the egg were winnowed in the juvenile, such as Caldisericota, Chlorobiota, Gemmatimonadota, Ignavibacteriota, Kiritimatiellota, Lentisphaerota, and Mycoplasmatota. Phyla present in both adult and egg that significantly increased their relative abundance in larva, juvenile1, and/or juvenile 2 included Acidobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Bdellovibrionota, Calditrichota, Chlamydiota, Chloroflexota, Cyanobacteriota, Myxococcota, Planctomycetota, and Thermodesulfobacteriota (Tables S4-2, S5-1 and S5-2).
Stage-abundant genera included Prosthecochloris in adult, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Chelatococcus, Achromobacter, Brevibacillus, Bacillus, and Anoxybacillus in egg, Vibrio, Nautella, Shimia, Oleiphilus, Nonlabens, and Mesoflavibacter in larva, Reichenbachiella, Kordia, and Teredinibacter in juvenile 1, Rhodovulum in juvenile 2 (Fig. S3B; Tables S4-2, S5-3 and S5-4). About a quarter of the genera in the adult were all present in egg, larva, juvenile 1, and juvenile 2, others were winnowed and/or probably acquired horizontally from seawater (Table S4-2).
Coral development drove the bacterial dynamics of D. veroni based on the variation in relative abundance of genera (Tables S4-2, S5-3 through S5-5). Significantly abundant genera in larvae were those in the orders Rhodobacterales, Oceanospirillales, Vibrionales, Flavobacteriales, and Chitinophagales. Juveniles had abundant genera in the orders Cyanobacteria, Rhodospirillales, Rhodobacterales, Gammaproteobacteria, Chitinophagales, Bdellovibrionales, Sphingomonadales, Alphaproteobacteria, Caulobacterales, Nostocales, Alteromonadales, Cellvibrionales, Oceanospirillales, Cytophagales, Flavobacteriales, Planctomycetales, and Phycisphaerales. While adults had genera in the orders Chlorobiales, Chromatiales, Nostocales, Chloroflexales, Rhodospirillales, Rhizobiales, Desulfobacterales, and Desulfarculales (Table S5-5).
Stable archaeal community with high diversity in D. veroni
Similar to the Archaea sequence number (Fig. S1C), the relative abundance in seawater (27.18%) was significantly lower than that in egg (45.60%), juvenile 1 (45.23%), and/or juvenile 2 (56.46%), which was higher than that in adult (35.69%) and larva (35.97%). Crenarchaeota, Hadarchaeota, Halobacterota, and Nanoarchaeia contributed to this shift although all phyla in egg or juvenile 1 were similar to other stages (Fig. 5C; Tables S5-1 and S5-2). The dominant Crenarchaeota, Halobacterota, Nanoarchaeia, and Thermoplasmatota (>97.38% of total sequences) and the rare Aenigmarchaeota, Altiarchaeota, Asgardarchaeota, Euryarchaeota, Hadarchaeota, Hydrothermarchaeota, Iainarchaeota, and Micrarchaeota in the adult were detected in the offspring at all four stages (Fig. 5C; Table S4-3).
Community composition varied only in the relative abundance of some genera. Methanobrevibacter, Haladaptatus, Haloarchaeobius, Halolamina, Haloferax, Candidatus_Halobonum, SCGC AAA011-D15, SCGC AAA286-E23, and Natronomonas were horizontally acquired from seawater (Tables S4-3, S5-3 and S5-4). Stage-abundant genera were Candidatus_Nitrososphaera and Hadarchaeales in adult, Bathyarchaeota, Candidatus_Nitrosopelagicus, Candidatus_Nitrosotenuis, Nitrosarchaeum, Candidatus_Nitrocosmicus, Haladaptatus, Halolamina, Halogranum, and GW2011-AR15 in juvenile 2 (Table S5-5). Both stages differed in Halogranum, Candidatus_Nitrosopelagicus, and Candidatus_Nitrososphaera (Fig. S3C). Candidatus_Nitrosopumilus, Cenarchaeum, Woesearchaeales were more abundant in corals than in seawater (Tables S4-3, S5-3 and S5-4).
DISCUSSION
Over three-quarters of scleractinian corals are broadcast spawners (11, 15). The broadcast spawning hermaphrodite D. veroni is consistent with reports of gametes with different egg colors (49), a common sexual reproduction in Dipsastraea (11, 50), and close egg diameters (51, 52). Synchronized mass spawning in corals appears to be driven by moonrise time (53), lunar cycle, and environmental factors (6, 11). Coinciding with low amplitude tides in Sanya Bay, D. veroni spawned approximately 4.5 h after sunset on the sixth to eighth night after the full moon, which is similar to Dipsastraea species on other coral reefs in different months (49, 50, 54). This may be related to seawater temperature (6, 11), which increases by over 1℃ for D. veroni compared to Acropora corals (March–April).
Juvenile growth of D. veroni is slow compared to branching corals (52, 55). Like other lipid-rich and lecithotrophic larvae (11), D. veroni larvae appear to contain sufficient lipid and yolk bodies for the juveniles to grow faster in the first half of the month than in the second half, which is still a winnow for favorable symbionts to proliferate and thrive. Life history traits of D. veroni, such as large size at the onset of reproduction, slow growth, and broadcast spawning species with high fecundity, support a stress-tolerant Dipsastraea species (33, 56).
Coral mucus is essential for the regulation of microbial populations (29), particle trapping (31), and adaptation (30). Ultrastructural observation revealed no symbionts in mucus-coated D. veroni eggs and/or larvae. However, sequencing showed transmission from the adult based on symbionts that were significantly more abundant in the egg and/or larva than in seawater (such as GS-A6, unidentified_Bathyarchaeota, Candidatus_Nitrosopumilus, etc.) or absent from seawater (such as Prosthecochloris, Rhodobacteraceae, Pseudomonas, etc.). This hypothetical vertical transmission via the mucus coating of gamete bundles with maternally derived symbionts or the surrounding seawater released from the parent colony has been occurred in spawning corals (57, 58). Vertical transmission with tight coevolution from partners may increase genetic bottlenecks (6, 59), whereas flexible symbioses facilitate coral survival and evolution (27, 28). Similar to Dipsastraea species (60, 61), D. veroni showed a flexible symbiosis with bacteria.
Unlike the azooxanthellae eggs of over 80% of broadcast-spawning corals (11), D. veroni appears to acquire Symbiodiniaceae from seawater and/or mucus contamination of adult, including the tropically diverse and ancestral Cladocopium (62, 63), along with the thermotolerant Durusdinium (64, 65) and the Symbiodinium with extensive carbon and nitrogen transporters (66). Durusdinium (LJ-D17, GS_D6, and GS_D2.2) increased significantly in juvenile 1 but decreased in juvenile 2, suggesting a heritable flexibility. Rare Symbiodiniaceae in D. veroni may contribute to coral survival and stress-tolerant traits (63, 67).
The dominant Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Cyanobacteriota, Bacillota, Planctomycetota, and Actinomycetota in D. veroni are similar to other reef-building corals (8, 68). Bacterial transmission appears to be related to coral development and environment, but not to sexual reproduction. Unlike broadcast spawning (69, 70) or brooding corals (71, 72), D. veroni juvenile acquired a greater diversity of bacteria than adult and differed from Dipsastraea species on other reefs (61, 73). Bacterial winnowing in larvae and/or juveniles suggests a flexible transmission mechanism as D. veroni develops. Environmental conditions influence juvenile bacterial communities more than maternal colonies (70, 72).
Corals prefer symbionts with specific functions at different stages. D. veroni adults had abundant photoautotrophic bacteria, including Chloroflexales, Cyanobacteriales, and Chlorobiales, which dominated the green layer of the coral skeleton (25, 61). Inconsistently, D. veroni larvae and/or juveniles contained photosynthetic bacteria such as Rhodobacterales, Rhodospirillales, Cyanobacteria, and Cyanobacteriales, which may provide photosynthetic products by carbon fixation (70) or metabolites from the sulfur (23) and/or nitrogen cycle (74). Photosymbionts, drivers of coral habitat selection (63, 75), may facilitate the survival and evolution of D. veroni. Stage-abundant Pseudomonadales and Bacillales in eggs may contribute to D. veroni defense against pathogens, as in other corals (29, 76).
Archaea may be abundant and not specifically associated with coral species (77, 78), but more geographically dependent (79). Archaeal symbiosis appeared to be coral and environment dependent. Compared to corals associated with 2–3 phyla (24, 80), D. veroni hosted 12 phyla of archaea with higher relative abundance than seawater, most by hypothetical vertical transmission and a few by horizontal acquisition. Archaea appear to favor juvenile survival, as more Crenarchaeota (Bathyarchaeota, Candidatus_Nitrosopelagicus, Nitrosarchaeum, Candidatus_Nitrosopumilus, Candidatus_Nitrocosmicus, and Candidatus_Nitrosotenuis), Halobacterota (Haladaptatus, Halogranum and Halolamina), and Nanoarchaeota (GW2011-AR15 and Woesearchaeales), together with other rare phyla, are potentially involved in the carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and iron cycling (24, 81).
In conclusion, D. veroni is a broadcast spawner. Lipid granules and yolk bodies contribute to the survival and growth of D. veroni at early life stages when symbiosis with Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria, and/or archaea appears to be a heritable process driven by coral development. Symbiotic establishment in D. veroni involved horizontal acquisition and hypothetical vertical transmission via the mucus coat with symbionts from the parent. Stage-abundant Symbiodiniaceae varied among the dominant Cladocopium, Durusdinium, and Symbiodinium, while bacteria varied among most phyla, especially those containing photoautotrophic and photosynthetic bacteria. The flexible symbiosis of bacteria in D. veroni shows a winnowing for favorable symbionts. The stable archaeal community is highly diverse, but with few stage-abundant genera. Reproductive traits and symbiotic mechanisms benefit D. veroni for survival and evolution during early ontogeny.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the staff of Tropical Marine Biological Research Station in Hainan for their logistical support.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (U23A2035), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC3100500, 2018YFC1406500), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2018A0303130173), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (2023B1212060047).
M.G. and H.H. conceived and designed the experiments. M.G. conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. J.L., G.Z., J.L., X.Y., and H.H. contributed to materials and analysis. All authors commented on the draft and gave final consent for publication.
Contributor Information
Minglan Guo, Email: guominglan@scsio.ac.cn.
Hui Huang, Email: huanghui@scsio.ac.cn.
Jennifer F. Biddle, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
All raw sequences have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive as BioProject PRJNA811408, PRJNA810708, and PRJNA1056452. All data sets associated with this study are included in the article and the supplemental material.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02359-24.
Modified Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 database.
Figures S1 to S3.
Tables S1-1 to S5-5.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M. 2004. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature New Biol 429:827–833. doi: 10.1038/nature02691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH. 2007. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318:1737–1742. doi: 10.1126/science.1152509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wilkinson C. 2008. Status of the coral reefs of the world: 2008. Global coral reef monitoring network and reef and rainforest research centre, Townsville, Australia. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Souter D, Planes S, Wicquart J, Logan M, Obura D, Staub F. 2021. Status of coral reefs of the world: 2020: summary for policymakers, p 1–5. Global coral reef monitoring network (GCRMN) and international coral reef initiative (ICRI). [Google Scholar]
- 5. Adjeroud M, Kayal M, Penin L. 2015. Importance of recruitment processes in the dynamics and resilience of coral reef assemblages, p 1–21. In Rossi S, Bramanti L, Gori A, Valle C (ed), Marine Animal Forests: The Ecology of Benthic Biodiversity Hotspots. Springer International Publishing, Cham. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Randall CJ, Negri AP, Quigley KM, Foster T, Ricardo GF, Webster NS, Bay LK, Harrison PL, Babcock RC, Heyward AJ. 2020. Sexual production of corals for reef restoration in the anthropocene. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 635:203–232. doi: 10.3354/meps13206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Boström-Einarsson L, Babcock RC, Bayraktarov E, Ceccarelli D, Cook N, Ferse SCA, Hancock B, Harrison P, Hein M, Shaver E, Smith A, Suggett D, Stewart-Sinclair PJ, Vardi T, McLeod IM. 2020. Coral restoration – a systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions. PLOS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bourne DG, Morrow KM, Webster NS. 2016. Insights into the coral microbiome: underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:317–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. van Oppen MJH, Blackall LL. 2019. Coral microbiome dynamics, functions and design in a changing world. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:557–567. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0223-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, Efrony R, Zilber-Rosenberg I. 2007. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:355–362. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Baird AH, Guest JR, Willis BL. 2009. Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:551–571. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120220 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Putnam HM. 2021. Avenues of reef-building coral acclimatization in response to rapid environmental change. J Exp Biol 224:jeb239319. doi: 10.1242/jeb.239319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ayre DJ, Hughes TP. 2000. Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the great barrier reef, australia. Evolution 54:1590–1605. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00704.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Banaszak AT, Marhaver KL, Miller MW, Hartmann AC, Albright R, Hagedorn M, Harrison PL, Latijnhouwers KRW, Mendoza Quiroz S, Pizarro V, Chamberland VF. 2023. Applying coral breeding to reef restoration: best practices, knowledge gaps, and priority actions in a rapidly‐evolving field. Restoration Ecology 31:e13913. doi: 10.1111/rec.13913 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Harrison PL. 2011. Sexual reproduction of scleractinian corals. Coral reefs: an ecosystem in transition Coral reefs:59–85. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0114-4_6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Edmunds PJ. 2023. Coral recruitment: patterns and processes determining the dynamics of coral populations. Biol Rev 98:1862–1886. doi: 10.1111/brv.12987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Apprill A. 2020. The role of symbioses in the adaptation and stress responses of marine organisms. Annu Rev Mar Sci 12:291–314. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mohamed AR, Ochsenkühn MA, Kazlak AM, Moustafa A, Amin SA. 2023. The coral microbiome: towards an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of coral-microbiota interactions. FEMS Microbiol Rev 47:fuad005. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. LaJeunesse TC. 2020. Zooxanthellae. Curr Biol 30:R1110–R1113. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(91)90107-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nitschke MR, Rosset SL, Oakley CA, Gardner SG, Camp EF, Suggett DJ, Davy SK. 2022. The diversity and ecology of Symbiodiniaceae: a traits-based review. Edited by Sheppard C.. Adv Mar Biol 92:55–127. doi: 10.1016/bs.amb.2022.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Muscatine L, Falkowski PG, Porter JW, Dubinsky Z, Smith DC. 1984. Fate of photosynthetic fixed carbon in light- and shade-adapted colonies of the symbiotic coral Stylophora pistillata . Proc R Soc Lond B 222:181–202. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1984.0058 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Trench RK, Harley JL. 1971. The physiology and biochemistry of zooxanthellae symbiotic with marine coelenterates. II. liberation of fixed 14 C by zooxanthellae in vitro . Proc R Soc Lond B 177:237–250. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1971.0025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Raina J-B, Tapiolas DM, Forêt S, Lutz A, Abrego D, Ceh J, Seneca FO, Clode PL, Bourne DG, Willis BL, Motti CA. 2013. DMSP biosynthesis by an animal and its role in coral thermal stress response. Nature New Biol 502:677–680. doi: 10.1038/nature12677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Siboni N, Ben-Dov E, Sivan A, Kushmaro A. 2008. Global distribution and diversity of coral-associated archaea and their possible role in the coral holobiont nitrogen cycle. Environ Microbiol 10:2979–2990. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01718.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yang S-H, Tandon K, Lu C-Y, Wada N, Shih C-J, Hsiao S-Y, Jane W-N, Lee T-C, Yang C-M, Liu C-T, Denis V, Wu Y-T, Wang L-T, Huang L, Lee D-C, Wu Y-W, Yamashiro H, Tang S-L. 2019. Metagenomic, phylogenetic, and functional characterization of predominant endolithic green sulfur bacteria in the coral Isopora palifera. Microbiome 7:3. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0616-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zarate D, Gary J, Li J. 2024. Flexibility in coral-algal symbiosis is positively correlated with the host geographic range. Ecol Lett 27:e14374. doi: 10.1111/ele.14374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Little AF, van Oppen MJH, Willis BL. 2004. Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals. Science 304:1492–1494. doi: 10.1126/science.1095733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Voolstra CR, Ziegler M. 2020. Adapting with microbial help: microbiome flexibility facilitates rapid responses to environmental change. Bioessays 42:e2000004. doi: 10.1002/bies.202000004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ritchie K. 2006. Regulation of microbial populations by coral surface mucus and mucus-associated bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 322:1–14. doi: 10.3354/meps322001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bhagwat PV, Ravindran C, Irudayarajan L. 2024. Beneficial properties of mucus in coral adaptations and ecological interactions. Mar Biol 171:46. doi: 10.1007/s00227-023-04372-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wild C, Huettel M, Klueter A, Kremb SG, Rasheed MYM, Jørgensen BB. 2004. Coral mucus functions as an energy carrier and particle trap in the reef ecosystem. Nature New Biol 428:66–70. doi: 10.1038/nature02344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bejarano I, Orenes-Salazar V, Bento R, García-Charton JA, Mateos-Molina D. 2022. Coral reefs at sir bu nair island: an offshore refuge of acropora in the southern arabian gulf. Mar Pollut Bull 178:113570. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Akmal KF, Shahbudin S, Faiz MHM, Hamizan YM. 2019. Diversity and abundance of scleractinian corals in the east coast of peninsular malaysia: a case study of redang and tioman islands. Ocean Sci J 54:435–456. doi: 10.1007/s12601-019-0018-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wong KT, Chui APY, Lam EKY, Ang P Jr. 2018. A 30-year monitoring of changes in coral community structure following anthropogenic disturbances in tolo harbour and channel, hong kong. Mar Pollut Bull 133:900–910. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pratchett MS, Baird AH, Bauman AG, Burt JA. 2017. Abundance and composition of juvenile corals reveals divergent trajectories for coral assemblages across the united arab emirates. Mar Pollut Bull 114:1031–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dufault AM, Cumbo VR, Fan T-Y, Edmunds PJ. 2012. Effects of diurnally oscillating pCO2 on the calcification and survival of coral recruits. Proc Biol Sci 279:2951–2958. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lajeunesse TC, Trench RK. 2000. Biogeography of two species of Symbiodinium (Freudenthal) inhabiting the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). Biol Bull 199:126–134. doi: 10.2307/1542872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cai L, Ye L, Tong AHY, Lok S, Zhang T. 2013. Biased diversity metrics revealed by bacterial 16S pyrotags derived from different primer sets. PLoS ONE 8:e53649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Minglan G, Hui H. 2022. A novel method and detection kit for the diversity of symbiotic archaea in corals. China Patent CN115992268B
- 40. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tong H, Cai L, Zhou G, Yuan T, Zhang W, Tian R, Huang H, Qian P-Y. 2017. Temperature shapes coral-algal symbiosis in the south china sea. Sci Rep 7:40118. doi: 10.1038/srep40118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, Santos SR. 2018. Systematic revision of symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol 28:2570–2580. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Okansen J, Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P. 2020. Community ecology package. Available from: https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan
- 48. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Babcock RC, Bull GD, Harrison PL, Heyward AJ, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL. 1986. Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the great barrier reef. Mar Biol 90:379–394. doi: 10.1007/BF00428562 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kongjandtre N, Ridgway T, Ward S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2010. Broadcast spawning patterns of favia species on the inshore reefs of thailand. Coral Reefs 29:227–234. doi: 10.1007/s00338-009-0551-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Randall CJ, Giuliano C, Stephenson B, Whitman TN, Page CA, Treml EA, Logan M, Negri AP. 2024. Larval precompetency and settlement behaviour in 25 indo-pacific coral species. Commun Biol 7:142. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-05824-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Shlesinger Y, Goulet TL, Loya Y. 1998. Reproductive patterns of scleractinian corals in the northern red sea. Mar Biol 132:691–701. doi: 10.1007/s002270050433 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lin C-H, Takahashi S, Mulla AJ, Nozawa Y. 2021. Moonrise timing is key for synchronized spawning in coral Dipsastraea speciosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118:e2101985118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101985118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Vo ST, Ho SL, Phan KH, Doan VT, Đang TTT, Nguyen VL, Harrison PL. 2022. Varied spawning patterns of reef corals in nha trang bay, vietnam, western south china sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science 55:102631. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102631 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Nozawa Y, Villanueva RD, Munasik M, Roeroe KA, Mezaki T, Kawai T, Guest J, Arakaki S, Suzuki G, Tanangonan JJB, Ang PO, Edmunds PJ. 2021. Latitudinal variation in growth and survival of juvenile corals in the west and south pacific. Coral Reefs 40:1463–1471. doi: 10.1007/s00338-021-02169-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Darling ES, Alvarez-Filip L, Oliver TA, McClanahan TR, Côté IM, Bellwood D. 2012. Evaluating life-history strategies of reef corals from species traits. Ecol Lett 15:1378–1386. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01861.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Thompson JR, Rivera HE, Closek CJ, Medina M. 2015. Microbes in the coral holobiont: partners through evolution, development, and ecological interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:176. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Leite DCA, Leão P, Garrido AG, Lins U, Santos HF, Pires DO, Castro CB, van Elsas JD, Zilberberg C, Rosado AS, Peixoto RS. 2017. Broadcast spawning coral Mussismilia hispida can vertically transfer its associated bacterial core. Front Microbiol 8:176. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kirk NL, Weis VM. 2016. Animal–symbiodinium symbioses: foundations of coral reef ecosystems. The mechanistic benefits of microbial symbionts:269-294. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28068-4_10 [DOI]
- 60. Oladi M, Rouzbehani S, Ahmadzadeh F, Ghazilou A. 2021. Dynamics of Dipsastraea pallida-symbiont association following bleaching events across the northern persian gulf and gulf of oman. Symbiosis 84:141–149. doi: 10.1007/s13199-021-00773-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Xu J, Chai G, Xiao Y, Xie Z, Yang X, Liao B, Xiao B, Li Z. 2023. The community profiles of symbiotic bacteria at the different life stages of coral Dipsastraea favus. Front Mar Sci 10:1055848. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1055848 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Thornhill DJ, Lewis AM, Wham DC, LaJeunesse TC. 2014. Host-specialist lineages dominate the adaptive radiation of reef coral endosymbionts. Evolution 68:352–367. doi: 10.1111/evo.12270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Baker AC. 2003. Flexibility and specificity in coral-algal symbiosis: diversity, ecology, and biogeography of symbiodinium. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:661–689. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132417 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Stat M, Gates RD. 2011. Clade D Symbiodinium in scleractinian corals: a “nugget” of hope, a selfish opportunist, an ominous sign, or all of the above. Journal of Marine Sciences 2011:730715. doi: 10.1155/2011/730715 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Howells EJ, Bauman AG, Vaughan GO, Hume BCC, Voolstra CR, Burt JA. 2020. Corals in the hottest reefs in the world exhibit symbiont fidelity not flexibility. Mol Ecol 29:899–911. doi: 10.1111/mec.15372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Aranda M, Li Y, Liew YJ, Baumgarten S, Simakov O, Wilson MC, Piel J, Ashoor H, Bougouffa S, Bajic VB, Ryu T, Ravasi T, Bayer T, Micklem G, Kim H, Bhak J, LaJeunesse TC, Voolstra CR. 2016. Genomes of coral dinoflagellate symbionts highlight evolutionary adaptations conducive to a symbiotic lifestyle. Sci Rep 6:39734. doi: 10.1038/srep39734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Suzuki G, Yamashita H, Kai S, Hayashibara T, Suzuki K, Iehisa Y, Okada W, Ando W, Komori T. 2013. Early uptake of specific symbionts enhances the post-settlement survival of Acropora corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 494:149–158. doi: 10.3354/meps10548 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Huggett MJ, Apprill A. 2019. Coral microbiome database: integration of sequences reveals high diversity and relatedness of coral-associated microbes. Environ Microbiol Rep 11:372–385. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Sharp KH, Ritchie KB, Schupp PJ, Ritson-Williams R, Paul VJ. 2010. Bacterial acquisition in juveniles of several broadcast spawning coral species. PLoS One 5:e10898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Zhou G, Cai L, Yuan T, Tian R, Tong H, Zhang W, Jiang L, Guo M, Liu S, Qian P-Y, Huang H. 2017. Microbiome dynamics in early life stages of the scleractinian coral Acropora gemmifera in response to elevated pCO2. Environ Microbiol 19:3342–3352. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Sharp KH, Distel D, Paul VJ. 2012. Diversity and dynamics of bacterial communities in early life stages of the caribbean coral Porites astreoides. ISME J 6:790–801. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Damjanovic K, Menéndez P, Blackall LL, van Oppen MJH. 2020. Mixed-mode bacterial transmission in the common brooding coral Pocillopora acuta. Environ Microbiol 22:397–412. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Shiu J-H, Lin C-H, Mulla AJ, Dang VDH, Fong C-L, Nozawa Y. 2022. Bacterial communities in coral Offspring vary between in situ and ex situ spawning environments. Front Mar Sci 9:796514. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.796514 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Lesser M, Falcón L, Rodríguez-Román A, Enríquez S, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Iglesias-Prieto R. 2007. Nitrogen fixation by symbiotic cyanobacteria provides a source of nitrogen for the scleractinian coral Montastraea cavernosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 346:143–152. doi: 10.3354/meps07008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Chow GSE, Chan YKS, Jain SS, Huang D. 2019. Light limitation selects for depth generalists in urbanised reef coral communities. Mar Environ Res 147:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kelman D. 2004. Antimicrobial activity of sponges and corals, p 243–258. In Coral health and disease. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kellogg CA. 2004. Tropical Archaea: diversity associated with the surface microlayer of corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 273:81–88. doi: 10.3354/meps273081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Wegley L, Yu Y, Breitbart M, Casas V, Kline D, Rohwer F. 2004. Coral-associated Archaea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 273:89–96. doi: 10.3354/meps273089 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Siboni N, Ben-Dov E, Sivan A, Kushmaro A. 2012. Geographic specific coral-associated ammonia-oxidizing archaea in the northern gulf of eilat (Red Sea). Microb Ecol 64:18–24. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-0006-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Tandon K, Ricci F, Costa J, Medina M, Kühl M, Blackall LL, Verbruggen H. 2023. Genomic view of the diversity and functional role of archaea and bacteria in the skeleton of the reef-building corals Porites lutea and Isopora palifera . Gigascience 12:giac127. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giac127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Baker BJ, De Anda V, Seitz KW, Dombrowski N, Santoro AE, Lloyd KG. 2020. Diversity, ecology and evolution of archaea. Nat Microbiol 5:887–900. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0715-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Modified Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 database.
Figures S1 to S3.
Tables S1-1 to S5-5.
Data Availability Statement
All raw sequences have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive as BioProject PRJNA811408, PRJNA810708, and PRJNA1056452. All data sets associated with this study are included in the article and the supplemental material.