Abstract
Background:
Metopic suture is a dense fibrous joint extending from nasion to bregma. Normally, closure of this suture takes place between 1-8 years of age. Failure of this closure beyond 8 years leads to persistent metopic suture. Persistent metopic suture may mimic skull fracture.
Aim and Objective:
To differentiate metopism from frontal bone fracture.
Material and Method:
54 dry skull of adult humans in were studied. These skulls were observed for the presence (complete or incomplete suture) or absence of metopic suture.
Result:
Metopic suture was found in 3.7% skulls. Both complete and incomplete metopic suture were found in 1.85% of the dry skulls.
Conclusion:
Neurosurgeons, radiologists, otorhinolaryngologists, physicians, anatomists, forensic specialists, anthropologists and evolutionary biologists should have knowledge of this anatomical variation. This case series focusses on the importance of metopism. Metopism is a topic, which has not been much studied.
Keywords: Cranial suture, fracture, frontal bone, metopism
Résumé
Arrière-plan:
La suture métopique est une articulation fibreuse dense s’étendant du nasion au bregma. Normalement, la fermeture de cette suture a lieu entre 1 et 8 ans. L’échec de cette fermeture au-delà de 8 ans conduit à une suture métopique persistante. Une suture métopique persistante peut imiter une fracture du crâne.
But et objectif:
Différencier le métopismed’une fracture de l’os frontal.
Matériel et méthode:
54 crânes secs d’humains adultes ont été étudiés. Ces crânes ont été observés pendantla présence (suture complète ou incomplète) ou l’absence desuture métopique.
Résultat:
Suture métopiquea été trouvé dans 3,7% des crânes. Des sutures métopiques complètes et incomplètes ont été trouvées dans 1,85 % des crânes secs.
Conclusion:
Neurochirurgiens, radiologues, oto-rhino-laryngologistes, médecins, anatomistes, médecins légistes, anthropologues et biologistes évolutionnistesdevrait avoir connaissance de cette variation anatomique. Cette série de cas se concentre sur l’importance du métopisme. Le métopisme est un sujet peu étudié.
Mots-clés: Fracture, os frontal, suture crânienne, métopisme
INTRODUCTION
Cranial sutures lead to the development of entire skull.[1] Variations of cranial sutures have their significance in medicine and surgery. Metopic suture (MS) is a dense connective tissue extending from nasion to bregma. MS has other names such as sutura frontalis persistens, caput cruciatum, sutura interfrontalis, sutura frontalis, and sutura mediofrontalis.[2] Fusion of MS starts at anterior fontanelle and terminates at nasion.[3] This fusion generally occurs between the 1st and 3rd year of life.[4] However, various studies have shown that the age of fusion varies from 1 to 8 years.[5] If there is no fusion till 8 years of age, then, it is considered persistent MS.[6] Suture may be incomplete or complete. This condition of persistent MS is known as metopism.[7]
Frontal bone occupies the most anterior part of the skull. It is a pneumatic bone, presents singly. This bone contributes in the union of neurocranium with viscerocranium.[8] Embryologically, there are two frontal bones. These two frontal bones join along the median plane. This suture is known as MS. Metopion is a Greek word which means space between the eyebrows.[9] Sometimes, wormian bones may be present in this median frontal suture (present between two superciliary arches).[10]
Metopism can occur singly or can be part of malformative syndromes such as craniofacial Tessier or cleidocranial dysostosis.[11] This persistent suture can be confused for frontal bone fracture or sagittal suture.[12] An important feature to differentiate metopism from frontal bone fracture is its sclerotic borders seen in the X-ray of anteroposterior view of the skull.[13] Knowledge of metopism is very crucial for medical professionals and paleoanthropologists. This study on dry crania of adult humans is noteworthy for the understanding of persistent MS. Metopism is a topic, which has not been much studied.
METHODOLOGY
Fifty-four dry skulls of adult humans in the department of anatomy were studied. These skulls were of Western Indian origin. These skulls were observed for the presence (complete or incomplete suture) or absence of MS. Suture running continuously from nasion to bregma has been defined as complete suture, whereas suture being present but not over this entire length has been defined as incomplete suture.
RESULTS
Out of the 54 dry skulls examined, MS was found in 3.7% (2 out of 54) skulls. Complete MS was found in 1.85% (1 out of 54) of the dry skulls. Moreover, incomplete suture was also found in 1.85% (1 out of 54) of the dry skulls [Figure 1].
Figure 1.
Figure showing Metopism. (a) Complete metopic suture, (b) Incomplete metopic suture, (c) Metopic suture as visualized from above, (d) Metopic suture seen on inner table of cranial vault) (*indicates metopic suture)
DISCUSSION
According to the present study, metopism was found in 3.7% of the Western Indian population. Among the studies done on the Indian population, results of the present study were similar to the findings of Das et al.[14] Whereas results of Chandrasekaran’s study (5% metopism) and Agarwal et al.’s study (2.66% metopism) refute the present study’s observations.[15,16]
Studies done on dry skull bone of different countries have different opinions. In Agarwal et al.’s study on the European and Mongolian population, metopism was found to be 8.7% and 5.1%, respectively.[16] Romanes observed 8% prevalence of metopism in the European population.[17] Whereas Ajmani et al. found 3%–4% of the Nigerian population with persistent MS.[12] While studies of da Silva Ido et al. and Castilho et al. on the Brazilian population observed metopism to be 4.48%, 2.75%, and 7.04%, respectively.[18,19,20]
There are various theories for the persistent MS. Cause of metopism has been discussed to be regulating factors and/or active expression of cytokines during cranial fusion and/or active resorption of chondriodal tissue and/or genetic influence.[19,21] Equilibrium among cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis is needed for the formation and persistence of suture. Several factors such as fibroblast growth factors (FGF), their FGF receptors, transforming growth factors-beta, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), Noggin an antagonist of BMP, homeobox MSX2, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor TWIST1, and runt-related transcription factor RUNX2 are responsible for osteogenesis, suture patency and closure.[22]
There are few studies which have correlated metopism with cephalic index. Some studies said; incidence of metopism to be more in dolichocephalic type, whereas according to others, incidence is more in brachycephalic type.[18,20] According to the latest study by Bryce, incidence of persistent MS is identical for both dolichocephalic and brachycephalic cranial types.[23]
MS is a small structure in lower mammals (smaller than the prominent internasal suture). In humans, MS is larger because of hypertrophy of frontal area of the brain.[24] In great apes, MS fuses almost at birth, whereas prevalence of metopism is lower in apes than in humans. Metopism is related to huge postnatal growth of the brain in humans. Studies on paleoanthropology have observed that Australopithecus africanus, Homo habilis, and Homo ergaster showed the presence of incomplete closure of MS, whereas metopism was a usual feature in Neanderthals.[25]
CONCLUSION
Metopism is clinically relevant anatomical variation. There are chances of it getting muddled up with skull fractures. It can also help in the identification of humans. Neurosurgeons should be aware of the presence of metopism before carrying out craniotomy. Forensic experts should have the understanding of differentiating midline skull fracture from persistent MS. Inaccuracies in its diagnosis can lead to fallacious treatment. Hence, knowledge of metopism is crucial for anatomists, forensic experts, physicians, neurosurgeons, radiologists, otorhinolaryngologists, anthropologists, and evolutionary biologists.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Batista Sandre L, Viandelli Mundim-Picoli MB, Fortes Picoli F, Rodrigues LG, Bueno JM, Ferreira da Silva R. Prevalence of agenesis of frontal sinus in human skulls with metopism. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017;35:20–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hauser G, De Stefano GF. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung; 1989. Epigenetic Variants of the Skull; p. 301. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weinzweig J, Kirschner RE, Farley A, Reiss P, Hunter J, Whitaker LA, et al. Metopic synostosis: Defining the temporal sequence of normal suture fusion and differentiating it from synostosis on the basis of computed tomography images. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1211–8. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000080729.28749.A3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Keith A. 6th. London: Edward Arnold; 1948. Human Embryology and Morphology. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Collins P. 38th. London: Churchil Livingstone; 1995. Gray’s Anatomy; p. 354. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mathijssen IM, Vaandrager JM, van der Meulen JC, Pieterman H, Zonneveld FW, Kreiborg S, et al. The role of bone centers in the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis: An embryologic approach using CT measurements in isolated craniosynostosis and Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:17–26. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199607000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bademci G, Kendi T, Agalar F. Persistent metopic suture can mimic the skull fractures in the emergency setting? Neurocirugia (Astur) 2007;18:238–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Latarjet M, Liard AR. 2nd. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Panamericana; 1993. Cabeca in Anatomia Humana; pp. 69–71. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fernandes GJ. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Pleiade; 1999. Eponymy: Glossary of eponymous terms in anatomy: Etymological dictionary of anatomical nomenclature. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zrunek M, Happak W, Hermann M, Streinzer W. Comparative anatomy of human and sheep laryngeal skeleton. Acta Otolaryngol. 1988;105:155–62. doi: 10.3109/00016488809119460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tang XJ, Gui L, Zhang ZY, Yin L, Pellerin P. A spectacle frame classification for rare craniofacial clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:195e–7e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182365ec3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ajmani ML, Mittal RK, Jain SP. Incidence of the metopic suture in adult Nigerian skulls. J Anat. 1983;137(Pt 1):177–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Das S, Suri R, Kapur V. Anatomical observations on Os Inca and associated cranial deformities. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2005;64:118–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Das AC, Saxena RC, Beg MA. Incidence of metopic suture in U.P. Subjects. J Anat Soc India. 1973;22:140. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chandrasekaran S, Shastri D. A study on metopic suture in adult South Indian skulls. Int J Basic Med Sci. 2011;1:379–82. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Agarwal SK, Malhotra VK, Tewari SP. Incidence of the metopic suture in adult Indian crania. Acta Anat (Basel) 1979;105:469–74. doi: 10.1159/000145154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Romanes GJ. 11th. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 1972. Cunningham’s Textbook of Anatomy. [Google Scholar]
- 18.da Silva Ido N, Fernandes KJ, Ramalho AJ, Bispo RF, Rodrigues CF, Aragão JA. Occurrence of metopism in dry crania of adult Brazilians. ISRN Anat. 2013;2013:158341. doi: 10.5402/2013/158341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fraga F. Metopism. Its incidence in Brazilian melanoderms. Folha Med. 1964;48:75–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Castilho MA, Oda JY, Santána DM. Metopism in adult skulls from Southern Brazil. Int J Morphol. 2006;24:6. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Longaker MT. Role of TGF-beta signaling in the regulation of programmed cranial suture fusion. J Craniofac Surg. 2001;12:389–90. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200107000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Opperman LA. Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn. 2000;219:472–85. doi: 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1073>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bryce TH. 11th. London, UK: Longmans Green; 1915. Osteology and arthrology, Quain’s Elements of Anatomy; p. 177. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rice DP. Developmental anatomy of craniofacial sutures. Front Oral Biol. 2008;12:1–21. doi: 10.1159/000115028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Falk D, Zollikofer CP, Morimoto N, Ponce de León MS. Metopic suture of taung (Australopithecus Africanus) and its implications for hominin brain evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:8467–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119752109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]