Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Jan 20;17(1):e77742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77742

Multiorgan Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism in a Critically Ill Patient

Robert Khairallah 1, Evgeni V Mekov 1,, Teodora Mihalova 1, Nedelina Kurtelova 1, Yordanka Yamakova 2, Rosen E Petkov 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11841817  PMID: 39981467

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Multiorgan ultrasound offers a non-invasive, bedside alternative to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for rapid diagnosis and management, particularly in critically ill patients.

We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with a high intermediate risk pulmonary embolism (PE), with Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class IV, multimodal ultrasound identified right ventricular dysfunction, elevated pulmonary artery pressures, and extensive lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, guiding timely diagnosis and management. This case highlights the utility of multimodal ultrasound as a non-invasive, bedside available diagnostic tool that facilitates effective management, particularly in critically ill patients when conventional imaging is not feasible.

Keywords: critically ill, deep vein thrombosis, echocardiography, pulmonary embolism, thoracic ultrasound

Introduction

Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a life-threatening disease, resulting in 10-30% mortality in patients within one month of diagnosis [1]. Thus, it is essential that diagnosis is made and treatment commenced as soon as possible to prevent further complications. CT pulmonary angiography is the gold standard diagnostic test, but this technique is expensive, not readily available, labor-intensive, difficult to apply in critically ill patients, and contraindicated in known or suspected allergy to contrast media or kidney failure [2].

Case presentation

A 68-year-old woman with comorbidities of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, obesity, surgical intervention for nodular goiter 40 years ago with subsequent hypothyroidism, as well as sectoral resection of the left mammary gland in 2001 due to a formation without medical documentation, presents with dyspnea at rest, as well as collapse before hospitalization. These symptoms began three weeks ago with collapse, typical chest pain for 14 days on the right and seven days on the left, and gradually progressed dyspnea to the inability to walk more than a few meters. She had no prior history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and was otherwise active before the onset of her symptoms.

On physical exam, she was cyanotic, with oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 85% on room air, as well as jugular vein distension, tachypnea with a respiration rate of 34 breaths per minute, and right-sided chest pain. Rales were present on auscultation on the right side of the chest anteriorly and axillary. A cardiac exam revealed tachycardia with a heart rate of 110 beats per minute, no present murmurs on auscultation, and elevated arterial blood pressure of 163/90 mmHg. Subfascial edema of the right lower extremity, with present peripheral pulsations in both legs. Calculated Well`s score is 8.5 points.

A chest x-ray presented an opacification on the right lower zone (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Chest X-ray at admission showing opacification in the right lower lung field.

Figure 1

ECG showed S1Q3 pattern with a sinus rhythm (Figure 2). Echocardiography was performed, revealing a D-shape left ventricle with paradoxical septal kinetics, third degree tricuspid valve regurgitation, and elevated systolic pressure of the pulmonary artery (50-55 mmHg) (Figure 3). Right ventricular systolic dysfunction was presented with reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) of 14 mm and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) of the lateral tricuspid annulus S1 6.3 cm/s. Vena cava inferior was dilatated with reduced inspiratory collapse dimensions (expiratory 30 mm, inspiratory 24 mm).

Figure 2. Electrocardiogram (ECG) at admission indicating S1Q3 pattern associated with pulmonary embolism.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Echocardiography: Tricuspid valve regurgitation, systolic pulmonary artery pressure is calculated at 55 mmHg.

Figure 3

Compressive ultrasound of the legs shows acute thrombosis of the right external iliac, communal, and superficial femoral and popliteal veins (Figure 4).

Figure 4. (A) Chest ultrasound. Subpleural consolidation measuring 25/45 mm, air bronchogram, in the absence of CD vascular signals. (B) Compressive and CD ultrasound of the lower extremities. Thrombosis of the right common femoral vein in the area of ​​insertion of the VSM dex.

Figure 4

Abbreviation: CD: Color Doppler

Laboratory findings show anemia, elevated white blood cells, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, potassium, serum creatinine (estimated GFR: 8.7ml/min/1.73m2), urea, uric acid, creatine phosphokinase (CPK), CPK-muscle/brain (CPK-MB), D-dimer and high-sensitive Troponin I, which is a risk stratification marker (Table 1). A Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score of 120 points was calculated, which determined high mortality risk (4-11.4%), class IV.

Table 1. Laboratory investigations at admission.

Parameters Patient Values Reference Range
White Blood Cells 24.46 3.50-10.80 x10^9/L
Red Blood Cells 3.46 3.76-5.34 x10^12/L
Hemoglobin 99 115-150 g/L
Hematocrit 0.298 0.350-0.490 L/L
Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) 86.1 85.2-98.5 fL
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) 28.5 27.0-33.0 pg
Platelets 299 112-330 x10^9/L
Lymphocytes (%) 7.5 15.2-41.9
Monocytes (%) 3.0 4.9 - 11.0
Eosinophils (%) 0.1 Up to 6.2
Basophils (%) 0.3 Up to 1.3
Neutrophils (%) 89.1 37.6-78.7
Lymphocytes, Absolute Count 1.84 1.00-4.50 x10^9/L
Monocytes, Absolute Count 0.73 0.40-1.10 x10^9/L
Eosinophils, Absolute Count 0.02 0.04-0.50 x10^9/L
Basophils, Absolute Count 0.07 Up to 0.10 x10^9/L
Neutrophils, Absolute Count 21.80 2.00-7.00 x10^9/L
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate 55 Up to 30 mm/h
Potassium 6.37 3.5-5.6 mmol/L
Sodium 141.3 135-151 mmol/L
Chloride 106.9 93-112 mmol/L
Procalcitonin 1.52 <0.50 μg/L
Glucose 10.04 3.50-6.10 mmol/L
Creatinine 438.75 Up to 134.00 µmol/l
Urea 15.38 1.7-8.2 mmol/L
Uric Acid 800.00 200.00-420.00 µmol/l
Aspartate Aminotransferase 146.49 Up to 40.00 U/l
Alanine Aminotransferase 209.54 Up to 41.00 U/l
Creatine Kinase 553 24-170 U/l
Creatine Kinase-MB 34.9 Up to 25.00 U/l
Fibrinogen 3.31 2.00-4.00 g/L
D-Dimer 32.60 <0.55 mg/L
High-Sensitive Troponin I 32.6 <0.50 ng/mL
Lactate Dehydrogenase 775.04 135-225 U/L

Arterial blood gas analysis on room air showed severe hypoxemia, hyperventilation (respiratory alkalosis), and metabolic acidosis with pH 7.20, PaO2 37 mmHg, PaCO2 22 mmHg, HCO3 14 mmol/l, BE 11 mmol/l, lactate 3.0 mmol/l.

The patient was admitted to the ICU. An intravenous initial bolus dose of heparin 5000E was applied, followed by 10000E/8 h continuous venous infusion, and titrated according to levels of activated partial thromboplastin clotting time (aPPT). High-dose oxygen supplementation was initiated using a mask with a reservoir bag, alongside fluid substitution, diuretics, antibiotics, diabetes and thyroid hormonal therapy. During hospitalisation, oxygenation improved and creatinine and uric acid levels dropped close to normal laboratory levels associated with age, sex and body weight 138.13 µmol/l creatinine levels and 123.78 µmol/l uric acid levels. A follow-up echocardiogram was performed, showing a decrease in systolic pressure of the pulmonary artery (40 mmHg). The patient was discharged after 15 days in a hemodynamically stable condition without respiratory failure. After discharge, the patient was prescribed apixaban at the standard initial dosing regimen of 10 mg twice daily for one week and a maintenance dose of 5 mg twice daily.

Discussion

This study describes a 68-year-old woman with high-intermediate risk pulmonary embolism, extensive lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, and acute respiratory and kidney failure successfully managed with multiorgan ultrasound-guided diagnosis and treatment.

The severity of PE can range from asymptomatic cases to massive embolism, causing sudden cardiac arrest. If untreated, the mortality rate in patients with acute PE is about one-third, whereas in patients that have received treatment death occurs in about 8% [3]. Submassive PE, characterized by right ventricular dysfunction without systemic hypotension, is associated with substantial morbidity, including long-term complications such as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), which occurs in up to 4% of survivors [4]. The risk of death or adverse outcomes is amplified by factors such as advanced age, comorbidities (e.g., malignancy or cardiovascular disease), and delays in diagnosis and treatment [5]. The Geneva and Wells clinical prediction rules, along with their simplified versions, have been validated in large populations and are useful for assessing patients, though they are not specifically designed for critically ill populations [6].

Multiorgan ultrasound, encompassing lung ultrasound (LUS), cardiac ultrasound (echocardiography), and lower limb venous ultrasound, has emerged as a pivotal tool in the management of pulmonary embolism (PE), particularly in critically ill patients. Its non-invasive nature, bedside applicability, and ability to provide real-time diagnostic information make it invaluable in settings where rapid decision-making is crucial. In this case, the compressive venous ultrasound findings of acute thrombosis in the right external iliac, communal, superficial femoral, and popliteal veins directly support the diagnosis of PE.

The integration of LUS, echocardiography, and venous ultrasound enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PE. LUS can detect peripheral pulmonary consolidations and pleural effusions indicative of PE [7]. Echocardiography assesses right ventricular function and pulmonary artery pressures, providing insights into hemodynamic impact. Venous ultrasound identifies deep vein thrombosis (DVT), often the source of emboli. Nazerian et al. demonstrated that combining these modalities increased sensitivity and specificity in PE diagnosis, reducing the need for computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in certain patient populations [8].

In this case, the echocardiographic findings were consistent with submassive pulmonary embolism, demonstrating right ventricular strain and elevated pulmonary artery pressures. Key findings included D shape of the left ventricle with paradoxical septal motion, an elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 50-55 mmHg, signs of right ventricular dysfunction (decreased TAPSE, tissue Doppler imaging systolic (TDI S) velocity and dilatated with reduced inspiratory collapse vena cava inferior). These findings are characteristic of acute right heart strain due to increased afterload caused by the embolic obstruction in the pulmonary vasculature. The echocardiography played a critical role in the risk stratification and management of this patient, highlighting the severity of the hemodynamic compromise and guiding therapeutic decisions. In addition, kidney impairment with elevated serum creatinine (438.75 µmol/L) and urea (15.38 mmol/L) levels indicated acute kidney injury, which may have been exacerbated by hypoperfusion due to the hemodynamic compromise.

An echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular size and function offers prognostic information in PE cases [9]. Right ventricular dysfunction is associated with increased mortality, and its detection can guide therapeutic decisions, including the consideration of thrombolytic therapy. The European Society of Cardiology emphasizes the role of echocardiography in risk stratification for acute PE [10].

In critically ill patients, transportation to the radiology department for CTPA can be challenging due to hemodynamic instability or even contraindicated if there is an allergy to contrast media or kidney failure. Bedside ultrasound mitigates this risk, allowing immediate assessment and continuous monitoring [11]. Multiorgan ultrasound yields a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 86.2%, lung ultrasound - 60.9% and 95.9%, echocardiography - 32.7% and 90.9%, and vein ultrasound - 52.7% and 97.6%, respectively, in patients suspected of PE and with a Wells score >4 or a positive D-dimer [8]. Moreover, it avoids radiation exposure and contrast-related complications, which is particularly beneficial in patients with renal impairment [12].

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), also known as direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban, directly target specific coagulation factors either thrombin (dabigatran) or factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban), to inhibit clot formation. Compared to traditional vitamin K antagonists (VKA), NOAC offer several advantages, including predictable pharmacokinetics, rapid onset of action, and the lack of need for routine laboratory monitoring [13]. These characteristics make NOAC more convenient and safer, particularly in reducing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Additionally, NOAC have fewer dietary and drug interactions, simplifying long-term management. Their efficacy and safety profiles have been well established in large-scale clinical trials, leading to their widespread adoption as first-line therapy for the treatment and prevention of VTE [14]. Despite their benefits, caution is required in patients with severe renal impairment or those at high risk of bleeding.

Conclusions

Multiorgan ultrasound could serve as a critical tool in the management of PE in critically ill patients, offering rapid, bedside diagnostic, and prognostic information that can guide timely therapeutic interventions. Its integration into clinical practice enhances patient care, particularly when conventional imaging modalities are impractical or pose additional risks.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Evgeni V. Mekov, Robert Khairallah, Nedelina Kurtelova, Yordanka Yamakova, Teodora Mihalova, Rosen E. Petkov

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Evgeni V. Mekov, Robert Khairallah, Teodora Mihalova, Rosen E. Petkov

Drafting of the manuscript:  Evgeni V. Mekov, Robert Khairallah, Rosen E. Petkov

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Evgeni V. Mekov, Nedelina Kurtelova, Yordanka Yamakova, Teodora Mihalova, Rosen E. Petkov

Supervision:  Rosen E. Petkov

References

  • 1.American Lung Association(n.d.) American Lung Association. Learn About Pulmonary Embolism. https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/pulmonary-embolism/learn-about-pulmonary-embolism https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/pulmonary-embolism/learn-about-pulmonary-embolism
  • 2.Diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Khosla R. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2006;10:105–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Bĕlohlávek J, Dytrych V, Linhart A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23940438/ Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013;18:129–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature. Ende-Verhaar YM, Cannegieter SC, Vonk Noordegraaf A, et al. Eur Respir J. 2017;49:1601792. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01792-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1383–1389. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients - prevention, diagnosis, and management. Vrettou CS, Dima E, Sigala I. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024;14 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Squizzato A, Rancan E, Dentali F, et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:1269–1278. doi: 10.1111/jth.12232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Accuracy of point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Nazerian P, Vanni S, Volpicelli G, et al. Chest. 2014;145:950–957. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Echocardiographic evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a review. Nasser MF, Jabri A, Limaye S, et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36:906–912. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:543–603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 1. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Chest. 2005;128:881–895. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Renal relevant radiology: use of ultrasound in kidney disease and nephrology procedures. O'Neill WC. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:373–381. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03170313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Why switch from warfarin to NOACs? Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Aita A, Bartolini C, Reboldi G. Intern Emerg Med. 2016;11:289–293. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1411-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Comparative effectiveness of warfarin and new oral anticoagulants for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Adam SS, McDuffie JR, Ortel TL, Williams JW Jr. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:796–807. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-00532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES