Abstract
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC), also known as stress cardiomyopathy, is a transient cardiac condition characterized by reversible left ventricular dysfunction, typically triggered by physical or emotional stress. While commonly associated with non-procedural stressors, TC has also been observed following medical or surgical interventions. This case report highlights TC as a rare but significant complication to a relatively safe and often life-saving procedure such as pericardiocentesis, underscoring the importance of timely recognition and management. Increased awareness of its potential triggers can prompt further research to ultimately enhance understanding of its pathophysiology, especially when occurring due to procedural stressors, to dedicate management plans directed toward the pathophysiology resulting in improved patient outcomes.
Keywords: left ventricular apical ballooning, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, tamponade
Introduction
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC), also known as stress-induced cardiomyopathy, is a temporary and reversible condition characterized by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, first described in 1990 [1]. It typically mimics myocardial infarction in the sense that both present with cardiac chest pain and have ST elevation or other ECG changes, but TC occurs in the absence of coronary artery disease [1]. TC is often precipitated by physical or emotional stressors [1,2], though it has also been linked to medical or surgical interventions.
The diagnostic criteria for TC, as outlined by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) in 2015, are as follows: 1. Transient regional wall motion abnormalities of left ventricular (LV) or right ventricular (RV) myocardium, which are frequently, but not always, preceded by a stressful trigger (emotional or physical); 2. The regional wall motion abnormalities usually extend beyond a single epicardial vascular distribution, and often result in circumferential dysfunction of the ventricular segments involved; 3. The absence of culprit atherosclerotic coronary artery disease including acute plaque rupture, thrombus formation, and coronary dissection or other pathological conditions to explain the pattern of temporary LV dysfunction observed (e.g. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, viral myocarditis); 4. New and reversible electrocardiography (ECG) abnormalities (ST-segment elevation, ST depression, left bundle branch block (LBBB), T-wave inversion, and/or QTc prolongation) during the acute phase (three months); 5. Significantly elevated serum natriuretic peptide (brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)) during the acute phase; 6. Positive but relatively small elevation in cardiac troponin measured with a conventional assay (i.e. disparity between the troponin level and the amount of dysfunctional myocardium present); 7. Recovery of ventricular systolic function on cardiac imaging at follow-up (three to six months) [1].
Case presentation
Patient history
The patient was a 54-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), managed with peritoneal dialysis for several years. She had no prior cardiac history, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, or arrhythmias. The patient presented to the emergency department with acute-onset shortness of breath that had progressively worsened over the past day. She denied chest pain, cough, palpitations, fever, loss of consciousness, or a history of similar episodes. She also denied contact with sick patients.
Her home medications included: Nifedipine extended-release, 120 mg OD; Sevelamer carbonate, 1600 mg TID with meals (WM); Lasix 120 mg BID; Valsartan 160 mg OD; Calcium carbonate, 600 mg oral TID; Carvedilol, 6.25 mg oral, q12hr; and Darbepoetin alfa 40 mcg subcutaneously, qWeekly.
Physical examination
On arrival, the patient was hemodynamically stable, with a heart rate of 73, blood pressure of 119/88 mmHg, and O2 saturation of 99% on room air. She was afebrile, conscious, alert, and oriented. Physical examination revealed elevated jugular venous pressure and muffled heart sounds. She had equal bilateral air entry, with no pulmonary rales, added sounds, or other findings suggestive of volume overload or acute pulmonary congestion. Her abdomen was soft and lax, with no tenderness. There were no signs of peripheral edema. The peritoneal dialysis site was examined, and there was no discoloration, discharge, or pain.
Initial investigations
Bedside echocardiography revealed a large pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology (including systolic atrial collapse and diastolic right ventricular collapse, along with a plethoric inferior vena cava). Electrocardiography revealed sinus rhythm and low voltage in the precordial leads with poor R-wave progression, along with T-wave inversion in inferior leads only, but no evidence of ST-segment changes (Figure 1). Electrolytes and hemoglobin levels were within normal limits (Table 1), consistent with the patient’s baseline laboratory values in the context of ESKD. Laboratory tests demonstrated an elevated troponin level of 133 and a BNP level of 6000 pg/ml (Table 2).
Table 1. Summary of laboratory results.
ER: emergency room
| ER Labs | Normal values | ER Labs | Normal values | ||
| WBC | 9.060 | 4.5-11 | Cr | 1355 | 53-92 |
| Hgb | 10.1 | 12-16 | BUN | 22.8 | 2.5-10 |
| Hct | 31.2 | 36-46 | Glucose | 7.03 | <5.6 |
| PLT | 412 | 150-400 | Phos | 3.11 | 0.97-1.45 |
| Na | 134 | 135-145 | Ca | 2.01 | 2.25-2.5 |
| K | 4.35 | 3.5-5.2 | ALT | 41.4 | 4-36 |
| CO2 | 18 | 22-29 | AST | 25.7 | 8-33 |
| Cl | 91.4 | 96-106 | |||
Table 2. Summary of laboratory results.
ER: emergency room; S/P: status post
| Troponin-T (ng/L) | BNP (pg/ml) | |
| ER (pre-pericardiocentesis) | 133.7 | 6022 |
| Post-pericardiocentesis | 246 | 6829 |
| Day 1 S/P | 1892 | |
| Day 2 S/P | 1407 | |
| Day 3 S/P | 1649 |
Figure 1. ECG on first presentation.
Sinus rhythm and low voltage in the precordial leads with poor R-wave progression, along with T-wave inversion in inferior leads only, but no evidence of ST-segment changes
ECG: electrocardiogram
Intervention
Given the echocardiographic findings of impending tamponade, percutaneous pericardiocentesis was performed under a sterile technique with echocardiographic guidance via the subxiphoid approach. Initially, 1250 mL of bloody pericardial fluid was drained. A pericardial drain was placed for continuous drainage, and an additional 150 mL of pericardial fluid was drained over the subsequent 24 hours, bringing the total drainage volume to 1400 mL. Following the procedure, the patient’s hemodynamic status improved significantly, with a resolution of tamponade physiology.
Post-procedure course
Echocardiography was repeated the following day after pericardiocentesis to reassess the pericardial effusion. It revealed a moderately sized pericardial effusion. However, the more significant finding was the incidental discovery of new regional wall motion abnormalities in the left ventricle (LV), presenting as akinesia of the apex and peri-apical areas (apical ballooning pattern). The LV systolic function was severely impaired due to these new changes, resulting in an ejection fraction (EF) of 25-30%. Mild to moderate right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction was also noted (Figure 2, Videos 1, 2).
Figure 2. Regional wall motion abnormalities with akinesia of the apex and peri-apical areas (apical ballooning pattern).
Video 1. ECHO showing regional wall motion abnormalities in the LV and an apical ballooning pattern.
ECHO: echocardiogram; LV: left ventricle
Video 2. ECHO: different view.
ECHO: echocardiogram
Follow-up ECGs revealed nonspecific ST-T changes, with significant QTc prolongation compared to baseline ECGs (Figure 3).
Figure 3. ECG changes post pericardiocentesis .
Nonspecific ST-T changes, with significant QTc prolongation compared to baseline ECGs
ECG: electrocardiogram
Laboratory tests showed a significant elevation in Troponin-T values, reaching up to 1892 ng/L, as well as an elevation in BNP, which reached up to 6829 pg/ml. Collectively, the new findings from the repeated echocardiogram, along with the ECGs and lab values, were highly suggestive of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC). Accordingly, the patient was started on appropriate heart failure medications, including Bisoprolol 2.5 mg OD and Valsartan 40 mg BID. As part of the plan, a follow-up echocardiogram was scheduled to be done soon thereafter. Over the course of her hospital stay, her symptoms improved significantly. Five days later, a follow-up echocardiogram was performed, and it showed significant recovery of bi-ventricular systolic function, with notable improvement in the previously observed regional wall motion abnormalities. There was only mild pericardial effusion (Video 3).
Video 3. ECHO after the resolution of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
ECHO: echocardiogram
Coronary angiography was initially planned as part of the workup. However, given the rapid recovery of LV systolic function and significant improvement of the regional wall motion abnormalities, the diagnosis of TC was established.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient’s pericardial effusion drain was reduced to nil, after which the pigtail was removed, and the patient was discharged in stable condition on the following medications: Bisoprolol 2.5 mg, Sevelamer 2400 mg, and Valsartan 80 mg BID. A follow-up appointment was scheduled, with a repeat echocardiogram to be performed in six weeks.
Discussion
This case highlights a relatively rare complication of a commonly performed procedure [3]. A complication that’s both critical to detect and easily reversible and resolvable, TC will present as a reversible, stress-induced left ventricular dysfunction that occurs due to physical or emotional stress [1]. Its definitive features include echocardiographic findings of transient regional wall motion abnormalities of LV or RV myocardium such as LV-basal hypercontractility and apical ballooning, a sudden, significant, and otherwise unexplainable drop in ejection fraction in the absence of culprit coronary artery disease; ECG abnormalities, a sudden elevation in BNP and Troponin T, and ending with the full resolution of the dysfunction and full recovery [1]. Pericardiocentesis is a life-saving procedure, which is generally regarded as a safe procedure; however, it is not without its complications. It is routinely used as a treatment option for pericardial effusion and is the definitive management for cardiac tamponade [4]. This case highlights the paradoxical effect of a procedure meant to relieve stress on the heart causing additional stress and inducing cardiac dysfunction. It adds to the limited body of evidence suggesting that after pericardiocentesis, physicians should maintain a higher index of suspicion for the possibility of progression to TC, particularly in higher-risk comorbid populations, such as those with hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking, alcohol abuse, anxiety, depression, and stress [5].
Previous literature
Similar cases of TC have been reported post-pericardiocentesis, such as by Zaclli (2024, US) [6], Bhutani (2022, India) [4], and Versaci (2015, Italy) [7]. Other cases have been reported after other types of procedures such as TC post-pericardiectomy (Zhang (2021, China) [8]) and post-cardiac surgery (Chiariello (2016, Italy) [2]). We believe that this warrants further studies to better understand the pathophysiological link between these interventions and the resulting pathology and to guide more specific management in future cases.
Conclusions
This case highlights Takotsubo cardiomyopathy as a rare but significant complication of pericardiocentesis. It adds to the limited body of research addressing this finding. Given the scarcity of available literature, this complication could be mismanaged, misdiagnosed, or missed completely. Clinicians should maintain a relatively higher index of suspicion for TC in post-procedure patients, particularly those with multiple comorbidities. Timely recognition and appropriate management can result in more favorable outcomes.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Khalid O. Almutlaq, Owais Mohammed Rahim, Ramy A. Elesely, Rayan M. Ghazal
Drafting of the manuscript: Khalid O. Almutlaq, Rayan M. Ghazal
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Khalid O. Almutlaq, Owais Mohammed Rahim, Ramy A. Elesely, Rayan M. Ghazal
Supervision: Owais Mohammed Rahim, Ramy A. Elesely
References
- 1.Current state of knowledge on Takotsubo syndrome: a Position Statement from the Taskforce on Takotsubo Syndrome of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Lyon AR, Bossone E, Schneider B, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:8–27. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takotsubo cardiomyopathy following cardiac surgery. Chiariello GA, Bruno P, Colizzi C, Crea F, Massetti M. J Card Surg. 2016;31:89–95. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.A case report of ventricular dysfunction post pericardiocentesis: stress cardiomyopathy or pericardial decompression syndrome? Ayoub C, Chang M, Kritharides L. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0026-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Transient left ventricular dysfunction after therapeutic pericardiocentesis - Takotsubo cardiomyopathy or pericardial decompression syndrome. Bhutani J, Batra A, Gupta A, Gupta A, Mahajan K. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2022;92 doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2022.2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prevalence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in the United States. Deshmukh A, Kumar G, Pant S, Rihal C, Murugiah K, Mehta JL. Am Heart J. 2012;164:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takotsubo cardiomyopathy as a complication of pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade: a rare clinical presentation. Zaclli A, Alrayyashi MS, Nassar S, Cardozo SJ. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83:4522. [Google Scholar]
- 7.An unusual complication following pericardiocentesis: reversible left ventricular dysfunction. Versaci F, Donati R, Mezzanotte R, Chiariello L, Ammirati F. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2015;16 Suppl 2:0–5. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32833cdbf1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takotsubo cardiomyopathy following pericardiectomy: a case report. Zhang H, Liao X. J Card Surg. 2021;36:4413–4415. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



