Skip to main content
Kidney International Reports logoLink to Kidney International Reports
. 2024 Nov 28;10(2):313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.11.029

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Workshop on the Nurse’s Role in Managing the Symptoms of People Receiving Dialysis

Paul Bennett 1,∗, Madeleine Warren 2, Zehra Aydin 3, Joachim Beige 4, Elaine Bowes 5, Michael Cheung 6, Jeanette Finderup 7, Daniel Gallego 8, Manfred Hecking 9,4, Helen Hurst 10, Jennifer M King 6, Werner Kleophas 11, Anastasia Liossatou 12,13, Pedro Martins 14,15, Afra Masià-Plana 16, Yvette Meuleman 17, Luca Neri 18, Edita Noruišienė 13, John Ortiz 19, Marianne Rix 20, Stefano Stuard 21, Yusuke Tsukamoto 22
PMCID: PMC11843113  PMID: 39990881

Abstract

Adults with kidney failure receiving dialysis frequently report high symptom burden that can limit life participation and decrease the quality of life. Fatigue, itch, pain, anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep problems, nausea, vomiting, muscle cramps, breathlessness, and decreased cognition can negatively impact important daily activities. Nurses are the majority health professional group that provides care for people receiving dialysis and have a major role in managing these symptoms. However, routine symptom management by nurses is not universal or standardized in dialysis care. In December of 2023, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a workshop on the Nurse’s Role in Managing the Symptoms of People Receiving Dialysis. The discussions focused on the current barriers nurses face when identifying and assessing symptoms, strategies for identifying symptoms, and the ongoing monitoring and management of symptoms. Nephrology nurses are pivotal in supporting the person with kidney failure receiving dialysis to minimize symptoms, optimize symptom management, decrease dialysis treatment burden, and improve life participation and quality of life.

Keywords: hemodialysis, kidney failure, nursing, patient-reported outcome measures, peritoneal dialysis, symptoms

Introduction

Adults undergoing maintenance dialysis for kidney failure frequently experience a wide range of symptoms, such as fatigue, pain, anxiety, and itch, which can negatively impact important daily activities and the quality of life.1,2 However, despite symptom frequency and impact, dialysis-associated symptoms can be challenging for health care professionals to assess, evaluate, and manage. When symptoms are identified, they may have uncertain causes and few or no specific treatments. With increasing treatment options specifically indicated for dialysis, recognition and acknowledgment of symptoms by health care professionals is a necessary first step toward alleviating them.

KDIGO held a Controversies Conference on Symptom-Based Complications in Dialysis in May 2022 to focus on strategies for assessment, management, and follow-up of symptoms associated with maintenance dialysis.3 Participants included physicians, patients, behavioral therapists, nurses, pharmacists, and clinical researchers. Throughout the meeting, participants emphasized communication between patients and health care providers as a vital step for eliciting patient experiences and perspectives to best prioritize management of symptoms associated with maintenance dialysis.3

Nephrology nurses are uniquely positioned to establish the essential rapport and open communication with adults undergoing dialysis to optimize quality health care.4,5 Reflecting on their experience at the 2022 KDIGO Controversies Conference, participating nephrology nurses discussed in the 2023 paper key issues related to symptom assessment and management that nephrology nursing can address.6 To build on this discussion, in December of 2023 KDIGO held a 1-day workshop, The Nurse’s Role in Managing the Symptoms of People Receiving Dialysis, to collaboratively develop and recommend processes for nurses in capturing and managing dialysis-associated symptoms. Among the 20 participants were nephrology nurses, individuals with kidney failure, nephrologists, a psychologist, and representatives from dialysis providers. Here, we summarize the deliberations among participants and describe strategies for supporting nurses in caring for individuals undergoing maintenance dialysis.

Current Barriers to Identifying Symptoms

Nephrology nurses are pivotal to identifying the symptoms suffered by people receiving dialysis. Despite this critical role, some barriers may limit nurses’ ability to effectively recognize and assess these symptoms. The key barriers faced by nurses in identifying and measuring dialysis-associated symptoms include the varying diversity of symptoms,7 knowledge limitations,8 lack of privacy in the dialysis unit,9 cultural issues,10 and, for home dialysis, fewer clinician–patient interactions.11

Symptom Diversity

The symptoms experienced by individuals undergoing dialysis are diverse and can arise from various physiological and psychosocial factors. Common symptoms include fatigue, nausea, vomiting, muscle cramps, itch, breathlessness, decreased cognition, anxiety, depression, and sexual difficulties.12 This diversity reflects the reality that clusters of symptoms have demonstrated interrelationships.13 In addition, validated questionnaires for specific symptoms are not always available or translated for target languages. Symptoms may have multiple underlying causes, including electrolyte imbalances, fluid overload, various pathophysiologies, and dialysis treatment factors.14 Moreover, the severity and burden of symptoms can vary significantly among patients, depending on factors such as age, comorbidity burden, dialysis modality, self-management skills, and treatment adherence.15 Symptoms may be highly prevalent and severe but not frequent or distressing. This variability adds to the complexity of recognition, assessment, and measurement of symptoms.

Knowledge Limitations

Nurses require knowledge of the many potential impacts of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the mechanisms and complications of dialysis, as well as strategies for shared decision-making and self-management support. However, studies have indicated gaps in nurses’ knowledge regarding CKD and dialysis management, particularly among those with limited experience or education in nephrology nursing.16 The reality in many dialysis programs is that there is often variation in nursing qualifications, knowledge, and experience, leading to an over-reliance on local, historical, and non–evidence-based practices.17 This may lead to nurses being unable to differentiate between dialysis-related and non–dialysis-related symptoms (e.g., different types of itch18). To complicate this even further, patients can have emotional or psychological challenges beyond the scope of nephrology nurse education, which includes limited mental health education.19

Dialysis Clinic Privacy

Privacy concerns in the dialysis environment can hinder open communication between patients and nurses, impeding the accurate identification and management of dialysis-related symptoms. Dialysis clinics can be nonprivate clinical environments where patients receive treatment near one another, thus limiting opportunities for confidential discussions and assessments.20 Patients may feel uncomfortable discussing sensitive symptoms or concerns in such settings, fearing embarrassment, multiple subsequent investigations, or being labelled as a needy patient.21 Where resources allow, efforts should be made to facilitate private discussions in spaces away from the main dialysis treatment area.

Cultural Factors

Cultural factors play a crucial role in shaping patient experiences of dialysis and willingness to report symptoms to health care providers. Cultural beliefs, values, support networks, and practices related to health and illness can influence an individual’s perceptions of symptoms, their help-seeking behaviors, and their interactions with health care professionals.22 Some patients may feel that they are bothering nurses by reporting subjective symptoms that are not a priority in the nurse’s workload.23 Language barriers, cultural taboos, and mistrust of the health care system may further complicate communication between nurses and patients from diverse cultural backgrounds.24 Nurses must be culturally competent, sensitive, and responsive to the needs of diverse patient populations to effectively identify and address dialysis symptoms.25

Home Dialysis Context

The increasing prevalence of home dialysis modalities present unique challenges for nurses in identifying and managing symptoms. Having fewer in-person interactions with nurses and other health care providers reduces the frequency of face-to-face visits, thereby limiting opportunities to assess symptoms, monitor treatment adherence, and provide timely discussions, support, and interventions for complications.26 In addition, in some regions, people dialyzing at home may underreport symptoms for fear of returning to center dialysis.27 Opportunities for automated and digital applications may improve communication, thus supporting dialysis symptom reporting and assessment.28

Strategies for Identifying and Managing Symptoms

Identifying, recording, and reporting symptoms require a comprehensive understanding of underlying causes, proficiency in using technology and measurement tools, and communication skills. Strategies to enhance the identification and recording of dialysis symptoms include the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), technology-assisted approaches, nursing education in dialysis symptoms, and the development of communication competencies and patient education strategies.

PROMs

PROMs enable patients to self-report the presence and extent of symptoms.29, 30, 31 PROMs collection provides opportunities for patients to identify symptoms, which nephrology nurses can then address in relation to what is important in the patient's life. Nurses are then in a position to support the person on dialysis in shared decision-making and self-management of symptoms.32 Validated tools such as the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale Renal, the Dialysis Symptom Index, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, have been developed specifically for assessing symptomatology in people receiving dialysis (Table 1).33 If a symptom is identified, then a more specific symptom-focused tool can be used. Frequently, symptoms overlap (e.g., fatigue and depressive symptoms), which can limit the addressment of a specific symptom.34 Furthermore, challenges to PROM tool implementation can include consumer indifference to PROMs, skepticism about the benefits of PROM data, and the limited treatment options open to clinicians.35 Strategies that nurses can use to increase the use of tools include education regarding the use of PROMs during the implementation, quick gains from using PROMs such as receipt of instant feedback, and a clear ambition on patient care such as a shared view on patient involvement and management support.35,36

Table 1.

Clinically pragmatic tools for capturing patient-reported symptoms

Tool name Web link Descriptor Applicability
Integrated Palliative Care Symptom Renal https://pos-pal.org/maix/ipos-renal-in-english.php 11 items: symptoms and concerns Can be tracked longitudinally; available in many languages
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-r https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/peolc/if-peolc-ed-esasr-admin-manual.pdf 9 common symptoms Short, can be tracked longitudinally; available in many languages
Dialysis Symptom Index https://www.jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-3924(03)00517-7/pdf 30 items: physical and emotional Can be tracked longitudinally; available in many languages
Chronic Kidney Disease Symptom Burden Index https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jorc.12152 Assesses the prevalence, distress, severity, and frequency of 32 symptoms. Other symptoms can be added Can be tracked longitudinally. Assesses symptom burden across all CKD stages and treatment modalities

CKD, chronic kidney disease.

Technology-Based Strategies

Integrating PROMs with technology offers a valuable approach to identifying and documenting symptoms.29 Technology-enabled platforms, including mobile applications and web-based portals, may facilitate the collection of PROM data, ideally allowing nurses to monitor symptoms remotely and intervene proactively. Using an application for data storage with the nurse entering the patient report at the dialysis session has shown promising feasibility.37,38 Thoughtful implementation is important to avoid mobile applications or checklists from becoming time-consuming, bureaucratic tasks.

Despite the potential benefits of technology in symptom monitoring, several challenges hinder widespread implementation in dialysis settings. These include financial constraints, interoperability issues between different health information technology systems, and concerns regarding data privacy and security.39 In addition, technological solutions may not be accessible or user-friendly for all patients.40 Addressing these challenges necessitates collaborative efforts between health care stakeholders, including policymakers, technology developers, nephrologists, and nephrology nurses to develop sustainable and scalable solutions that meet the unique needs of people requiring dialysis.

Self-Management Support

Although proficiencies in dialysis machine operation, cannulation skills, and patient safety are essential, nephrology nurses must possess a broader knowledge base to effectively identify, document, and develop a shared plan with the patient experiencing the symptoms.41 This requires nurses to have the knowledge, skills, and confidence in implementing patient-centered approaches and shared decision-making principles.42 This includes a mutual understanding of the multifactorial nature of dialysis-related symptoms, the interplay between comorbidities and dialysis treatment, and the psychosocial factors influencing symptom experiences.43 Thus, nurses require competency in symptom management and self-management approaches along with the more traditional dialysis competencies.

Nurse Coaching

The capacity for nurses to act as “patient coaches” can empower nurses to engage effectively with patients, elicit symptom information, identify barriers to self-management, and foster therapeutic relationships.44 Specific directive techniques such as motivational interviewing can help successfully activate patients to self-manage their care.45 Empowering nurses to engage more effectively with improved communication techniques can increase their confidence to facilitate collaborative communication, coordinate care efforts, and address complexities of symptom management.

Patient Peer Support

Patient peer education programs can provide comprehensive and easy-to-understand information on the causes and manifestations of dialysis symptoms, as well as practical strategies for symptom mitigation and self-management.7 To enhance patient empowerment, and structured, resourced peer support programs facilitated by trained peer mentors or support groups can offer valuable informational, emotional, and social support to patients navigating dialysis treatment.46,47 Given that many patients receive poor-quality web-based dialysis information, peers can promote reputable online resources and help patients to make informed decisions about their symptoms and care. Furthermore, peer support can validate symptoms as likely being dialysis-related and give individuals confidence to report them and seek help.48

Ongoing Monitoring of Dialysis Symptoms

Nurses are pivotal in the ongoing monitoring of symptoms following treatment. Leveraging technology and PROMs can enhance symptom monitoring and contribute to nursing management. Mobile applications and digital platforms offer opportunities for patients to self-report their symptoms and communicate with clinicians.49 These technologies enable health care providers to adjust treatment plans based on symptom severity and progression.

The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale Renal, the Dialysis Symptom Index, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System facilitate symptom monitoring and enable longitudinal tracking of symptom trajectories over time, allowing for early identification of worsening symptoms and adjustment of treatment strategies.50 The Dialysis Symptom Index was selected by Dutch patients as the optimal questionnaire for routine symptom assessment given its low-burden and comprehensive listing of symptoms.51 The comprehensiveness is especially important given the broad spectrum of physical and emotional symptoms that people on dialysis experience, with many common symptoms bundling and interacting, such as fatigue, itch, sleep disturbances, and depressive symptoms.

Beyond the generic symptom tools, more specific ones for common symptoms can be used to individualize care. These provide information on symptom occurrence, severity, and burden, and they can be used for assessment over time. For example, fatigue, the most prevalent distressing symptom for CKD, can further be assessed with fatigue-specific scales such as Fatigue Severity Scale1,52 and the FACIT Fatigue Scale.53 For another prevalent and often severe symptom, CKD-associated pruritis, there are short scales that nurses can use to track and measure an individual’s CKD-associated pruritic trajectory. Measurement tools range from 1-item tools such as the Worst Itching Intensity Numeric Rating Scale,54 Numeric Rating Scale,55 Visual Analog Scale,56 Verbal Rating Scale,55 Dynamic Pruritus Score,57 Patient Global Impression of Change,54 to the 5-D Itch Scale that measures the duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution of pruritus.58

Frequency and Timing

Measuring the effectiveness of interventions (pharmacological and nonpharmacological) and making timely adjustments to treatment plans is critical. Evaluation should be conducted at regular intervals based on the severity and stability of symptoms as well as the patient’s response to treatment.36,59 For acute symptoms requiring immediate intervention, evaluation (e.g., using a symptom-specific PROM) may occur within hours to days, whereas for chronic symptoms, reassessments may be scheduled at longer intervals (e.g., weeks to months, by using a more complete PROM for dialysis symptoms). It is imperative that nurses use opportune moments throughout their day to assess, manage, and informally loop back with individuals regarding their dialysis symptoms.6 Although evaluation can be led by nurses, they should involve multidisciplinary collaboration between nephrologists, dialysis technicians, dietitians, pharmacists, and other allied health care professionals to ensure comprehensive symptom management.21 In addition, patient engagement and shared decision-making are paramount in determining the frequency and timing of reassessments, because patient preferences and priorities may vary depending on their individual circumstances and treatment goals.

The Role of Nursing in Dialysis Symptom Management

Among clinical professionals, nurses spend the most time with individuals receiving dialysis.17 The Symptom Management Theory describes 3 interactive components as follows: (i) symptom experience, which is a simultaneous perception, evaluation, and response to a change in one’s usual feeling; (ii) symptom management strategies, which are efforts to avert, delay, or minimize the symptom experience; and (iii) symptom outcomes, which are clear and measurable outcomes to assess before and after implementing an intervention strategy.60 Expanding the capacity of nurses to manage symptoms requires leadership skills, advanced practice education, and visibility within governing bodies.

Empowering Nurses to be Leaders

Empowering nurses to take on clinical leadership roles in symptom management is paramount. In many regions of the world, the role of nurses in dialysis predominantly involves carrying out physician orders.61 However, because nurses spend the most time with people receiving dialysis, they can act as advocates to ensure that symptom management needs are effectively communicated and addressed by other members of the health care team.62 With education and experience regarding dialysis and its associated symptoms, nurses are well-equipped to lead symptom management initiatives throughout the patient pathway.63 This collaborative approach enhances the overall quality of care provided on dialysis, ultimately leading to improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction.

It is important to recognize that there are differing roles with nephrology nursing. All nephrology nurses working in a dialysis setting regardless of job title require skills and education to actively lead and manage symptom burden. There is some evidence supporting the use of advanced and specialized roles to enhance the management of complex symptoms associated with dialysis.6 Although advanced roles may not be feasible in less-resourced regions, the advantages of advanced roles that take on previous medical domains can establish strong therapeutic relationships with patients and their families, ensuring ongoing support and education regarding symptom management strategies. This continuity of care can enhance patient adherence to treatment regimens and fosters trust and rapport between patients and health care providers.64

Nephrology Nursing Leadership

To advocate effectively for the symptom management needs of people receiving dialysis, nurses must provide leadership and increase visibility within governing bodies and policy-making organizations, including dialysis provider organizations. Nurses possess valuable insights and perspectives derived from their frontline experiences caring for people receiving dialysis, making their input essential in shaping health care policies and guidelines related to symptom management.6 Increasing the profile of nephrology nurses requires drawing attention to the unique set of skills, knowledge, and expertise they offer to patient care; advocating for their representation in debates about health care policy; and raising the general understanding of kidney disease and its complications.

The 2023 Nurse’s Role in Managing the Symptoms of People Receiving Dialysis 1-day workshop was convened to collaboratively develop and recommend processes for nurses in capturing and managing dialysis-associated symptoms. The scope for discussion was focused and therefore limited. Important aspects such as symptoms in children receiving dialysis and the role of the caregivers were not covered. These aspects are recommended to be included in future meetings and reports. Furthermore, it was beyond the scope of this workshop and paper to report on all previous nursing-led research on dialysis symptoms.

By actively participating in quality improvement in providing dialysis, professional organizations, and advocacy initiatives, nurses can advocate for patients and for their crucial role in symptom management and can influence decision-making processes at local, national, and international levels. This enhanced leadership can enable nurses to advocate for policies that prioritize patient-centered care and support innovative approaches to symptom management in dialysis settings. Enhanced leadership can promote the optimal requirements in the patient–nurse relationship, nurse education, care by dialysis clinics and providers, and nursing profession domains (Table 2).

Table 2.

Elements of symptom management

Context Elements
Minimal Additional optimal
Nurse-patient moments
  • •

    Ask, affirm, assess, alleviate

  • •

    Trust and rapport development

  • •

    Face-to-face education

  • •

    Refer symptoms to multi-disciplinary team

  • •

    Structured nurse/patient symptom assessment

Nephrology nurse education
  • •

    Continuous professional development

  • •

    Evidence-based research education

  • •

    Knowledge of assessment tools

  • •

    Leadership of symptom quality improvement projects

  • •

    Onboarding of nurses that includes focus on symptom assessment and management

Dialysis clinic
  • •

    Informal symptom meetings/huddles

  • •

    Management support for routine symptom assessment

  • •

    Informal/formal symptom meetings/huddles

  • •

    Leadership, coaching, mentorship

  • •

    Patient peer support facilitation

  • •

    Patient acuity system (i.e., system for measuring severity of symptoms to estimate resources needed for management)

Dialysis provider
  • •

    Programs for staff education

  • •

    Symptom assessment tools (paper or digital)

  • •

    Mandatory symptom education

  • •

    Digital symptom management systems

  • •

    Professional external education and support

  • •

    Support for research projects on symptom assessment and management

  • •

    Development of key performance indicators including symptom assessment and management

Nursing profession
  • •

    Nursing professional organization advocacy

  • •

    Continued professional development programs

  • •

    Nephrology nursing patient symptom competencies

  • •

    Nurse-led symptom research support

Conclusion

Nephrology nurses play a crucial role in alleviating the symptom burden for people with kidney failure who are receiving dialysis. Nurses can address barriers when identifying and assessing symptoms and provide strategies for managing symptoms in partnership with the person receiving dialysis. Thus, nephrology nurses are pivotal in supporting the person to optimize symptom management, minimize symptoms, decrease dialysis treatment burden, and improve life participation and quality of life.

Disclosure

EB discloses receipt of speaker honoraria from Baxter Healthcare and travel support from the International Society of Nephrology and the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. MH discloses receipt of grants and honoraria from Vifor. WK discloses receipt of consulting fees from Vifor Pharma; receipt of honoraria from Bayer Vital, Baxter Germany, Vifor Fresenius Pharma, GSK, mannheim:congress GmbH, and MedTriX; serving as a board member for DaVita Deutschland AG; and being an employee of DaVita Deutschland AG. AMP discloses support from Vifor Fresenius Medical Care. YT discloses receipt of consulting fees from Kaneka Corporation and honoraria from AstraZeneca Japan, Eli Lilly Japan, Kyowa Kirin, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Sanwa Chemical. All the other authors declared no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The conference was sponsored by KDIGO and was in part supported by an unrestricted educational grant from CSL Vifor. KDIGO provided travel and medical writing support to all conference participants.

References

  • 1.Almutary H., Bonner A., Douglas C. Symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: a review of recent literature. J Ren Care. 2013;39:140–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2013.12022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Flythe J.E., Hilliard T., Castillo G., et al. Symptom prioritization among adults receiving in-center hemodialysis: a mixed methods study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13:735–745. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10850917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mehrotra R., Davison S.N., Farrington K., et al. Managing the symptom burden associated with maintenance dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2023;104:441–454. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stavropoulou A., Grammatikopoulou M.G., Rovithis M., Kyriakidi K., Pylarinou A., Markaki A.G. Through the patients’ eyes: the experience of end-stage renal disease patients concerning the provided nursing care. Healthcare. 2017;5:36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gomez N., Castner D. Nephrology Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice: the first piece of the nursing process. American Nephrology Nurses Association. 2017. https://www.annanurse.org/download/reference/association/standardsOfPractice.pdf [PubMed]
  • 6.Ng M.S.N., Brown E.A., Cheung M., et al. The role of nephrology nurses in symptom management—reflections on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Controversies Conference on Symptom-Based Complications in Dialysis Care. Kidney Int Rep. 2023;8:1903–1906. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feldman R., Berman N., Reid M.C., et al. Improving symptom management in hemodialysis patients: identifying barriers and future directions. J Palliat Med. 2013;16:1528–1533. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bonner A. Understanding the role of knowledge in the practice of expert nephrology nurses in Australia. Nurs Health Sci. 2007;9:161–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peipert J.D., Hays R.D. Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0010-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Caplin B., Kumar S., Davenport A. Patients’ perspective of haemodialysis-associated symptoms. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:2656–2663. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bennett P.N., Eilers D., Yang F., Rabetoy C.P. Perceptions and practices of nephrology nurses working in home dialysis: an international survey. Nephrol Nurs J. 2019;46:485–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morton R.L., Webster A.C. In: Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Clinician’s Guide. Arıcı M., editor. Springer International Publishing; 2023. Quality of life in chronic kidney disease; pp. 579–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Almutary H., Douglas C., Bonner A. Towards a symptom cluster model in chronic kidney disease: a structural equation approach. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73:2450–2461. doi: 10.1111/jan.13303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ng M.S.N., Miaskowski C., Cooper B., et al. Distinct symptom experience among subgroups of patients with ESRD receiving maintenance dialysis. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2020;60:70–79.e71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tong A., Crowe S., Chando S., et al. Research priorities in CKD: report of a national workshop conducted in Australia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:212–222. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.02.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gaietto K.J., Brooks M.V. The shortage of expert nephrology nurses in hemodialysis: a literature review. Nephrol Nurs J. 2019;46:577–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bennett P.N. Satellite dialysis nursing: technology, caring and power. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67:149–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05474.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davidson S., Giesler G.J. The multiple pathways for itch and their interactions with pain. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:550–558. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feroze U., Martin D., Reina-Patton A., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kopple J.D. Mental health, depression, and anxiety in patients on maintenance dialysis. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2010;4:173–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tong A., Palmer S., Manns B., et al. The beliefs and expectations of patients and caregivers about home haemodialysis: an interview study. BMJ Open. 2013;3 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van der Willik E.M., Milders J., Bart J.A.J., et al. Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2022;12 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Muscat D.M., Kanagaratnam R., Shepherd H.L., Sud K., McCaffery K., Webster A. Beyond dialysis decisions: a qualitative exploration of decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:339. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1131-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Damery S., Sein K., Nicholas J., Baharani J., Combes G. The challenge of managing mild to moderate distress in patients with end stage renal disease: results from a multi-centre, mixed methods research study and the implications for renal service organisation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:989. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4808-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Griva K., Seow P.S., Seow T.Y., et al. Patient-related barriers to timely dialysis access preparation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients, family members, and health care providers. Kidney Med. 2020;2:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aryal S., Bennett P.N., Bloomer M.J. Culturally responsive care in haemodialysis: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33:4267–4279. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Figueiredo A.E., Goodlad C., Clemenger M., et al. Evaluation of physical symptoms in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/305424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kliger A.S. Maintaining safety in the dialysis facility. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:688–695. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08960914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anderson N.E., Kyte D., McMullan C., et al. Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2023;13 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Viecelli A.K., Duncanson E., Bennett P.N., et al. Perspectives of patients, nurses, and nephrologists about electronic symptom monitoring with feedback in hemodialysis care. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;80:215–226.e211. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Flythe J.E., Powell J.D., Poulton C.J., et al. Patient-reported outcome instruments for physical symptoms among patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:1033–1046. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anderson N.E., McMullan C., Calvert M., et al. Using patient-reported outcome measures during the management of patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis (PROM-HD): a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021;11 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Damman O.C., Jani A., de Jong B.A., et al. The use of Proms and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: an opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26:524–540. doi: 10.1111/jep.13321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fletcher B.R., Damery S., Aiyegbusi O.L., et al. Symptom burden and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Med. 2022;19 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jhamb M., Weisbord S.D., Steel J.L., Unruh M. Fatigue in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a review of definitions, measures, and contributing factors. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:353–365. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sipma W.S., de Jong M.F.C., Meuleman Y., Hemmelder M.H., Ahaus K.C.T.B. Facing the challenges of PROM implementation in Dutch dialysis care: patients’ and professionals’ perspectives. PLoS One. 2023;18 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van der Willik E.M., Terwee C.B., Bos W.J.W., et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): making sense of individual PROM scores and changes in PROM scores over time. Nephrology (Carlton) 2021;26:391–399. doi: 10.1111/nep.13843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gabbard J., McLouth C.J., Brenes G., et al. Rapid electronic capturing of patient-reported outcome measures in older adults with end-stage renal disease: a feasibility study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021;38:432–440. doi: 10.1177/1049909120954805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kyte D., Anderson N., Auti R., et al. Development of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system to aid the management of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4:55. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00223-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aiyegbusi O.L., Kyte D., Cockwell P., et al. Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Comput Biol Med. 2018;101:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hussein W.F., Bennett P.N., Pace S., et al. The mobile health readiness of people receiving in-center hemodialysis and home dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;16:98–106. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11690720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Finderup J., Jensen J.D., Lomborg K. Shared decision-making in dialysis choice has potential to improve self-management in people with kidney disease: a qualitative follow-up study. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77:1878–1887. doi: 10.1111/jan.14726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lunardi R., Le Leu R.K., Matricciani L.A., et al. Patient activation in advanced chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. J Nephrol. 2024;37:343–352. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01847-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baragar B., Schick-Makaroff K., Manns B., et al. “You need a team”: perspectives on interdisciplinary symptom management using patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis care - a qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023;7:3. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00538-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Buur L.E., Bekker H.L., Mathiesen C.L., et al. Decision coaching for people with kidney failure: a case study. J Ren Care. 2023;49:220–228. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Koh-Knox C.P. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73:127. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bennett P.N., St Clair Russell J., Atwal J., Brown L., Schiller B. Patient-to-patient peer mentor support in dialysis: improving the patient experience. Semin Dial. 2018;31:455–461. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Devins G.M., Mendelssohn D.C., Barré P.E., Taub K., Binik Y.M. Predialysis psychoeducational intervention extends survival in CKD: a 20-year follow-up. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46:1088–1098. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hussein W.F., Bennett P.N., Abra G., Watson E., Schiller B. Integrating patient activation into dialysis care. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79:105–112. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang L., Guo Y., Wang M., Zhao Y. A mobile health application to support self-management in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35:90–101. doi: 10.1177/0269215520946931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hays R.D., Kallich J.D., Mapes D.L., Coons S.J., Carter W.B. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:329–338. doi: 10.1007/BF00451725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.van der Willik E.M., Meuleman Y., Prantl K., et al. Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease - a four-phase mixed methods study. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:344. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1521-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ju A., Unruh M.L., Davison S.N., et al. Patient-reported outcome measures for fatigue in patients on hemodialysis: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71:327–343. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Macdonald J.H., Fearn L., Jibani M., Marcora S.M. Exertional fatigue in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:930–939. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vernon M.K., Swett L.L., Speck R.M., et al. Psychometric validation and meaningful change thresholds of the Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale for assessing itch in patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021;5:134. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00404-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Phan N.Q., Blome C., Fritz F., et al. Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:502–507. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Reich A., Chatzigeorkidis E., Zeidler C., et al. Tailoring the cut-off values of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale in itch assessment. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97:759–760. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ständer S., Blome C., Anastasiadou Z., et al. Dynamic Pruritus Score: evaluation of the validity and reliability of a new instrument to assess the course of pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97:230–234. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Elman S., Hynan L.S., Gabriel V., Mayo M.J. The 5-D itch scale: a new measure of pruritus. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:587–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09586.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Flythe J.E. Integrating Proms in routine dialysis care: the devil is in the (implementation) details. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17:1580–1582. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10840922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bender M.S., Janson S., Franck L.S., et al. In: Middle Range Theory for Nursing. 4th ed. Smith M.J., Liehr P.R., editors. Springer Publishing Company; 2018. Theory of symptom management; pp. 147–177. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lingel J., Clark-Parsons R., Branciforte K. More than handmaids: nursing, labor activism and feminism. Gend Work Organ. 2022;29:1149–1163. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12816. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fitzpatrick S., Dunlap E. Right access, right time: how nurses can advocate for best practice. Nephrol Nurs J. 2022;49:257–263. doi: 10.37526/1526-744X.2022.49.3.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bourbonnais F.F., Tousignant K.F. Experiences of nephrology nurses in assessing and managing pain in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J. 2020;47:37–44. doi: 10.37526/1526-744X.2020.41.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Murali K.M., Lonergan M. Breaking the adherence barriers: strategies to improve treatment adherence in dialysis patients. Semin Dial. 2020;33:475–485. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Kidney International Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES