Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1997 Mar;72(3):1388–1395. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78785-X

Histone H1 preferentially binds to superhelical DNA molecules of higher compaction.

M Ivanchenko 1, J Zlatanova 1, K van Holde 1
PMCID: PMC1184521  PMID: 9138584

Abstract

In chromatin, the physiological amount of H1 is one molecule per nucleosome or, roughly, one molecule per 200 bp of DNA. We observed that at such a stoichiometry, H1 selectively binds to supercoiled DNA with magnitude of sigma > or = 0.012 (both negative and positive), leaving relaxed, linear, or nicked DNA molecules unbound. When negative and positive DNA topoisomers of varying superhelicity are simultaneously present in the binding mixture, H1 selectively binds to the molecules with highest superhelicity; less supercoiled forms are gradually involved in binding upon increasing the amount of input protein. We explain this topological preference of H1 as the consequence of an increased probability for more than one H1-DNA contact provided by the supercoiling. The existence of simultaneous contacts of H1 with both intertwined DNA strands in the supercoiled DNA molecules is also inferred by topoisomerase relaxation of H1-DNA complexes that had been prefixed with glutaraldehyde.

Full text

PDF
1388

Images in this article

1389FIGURE 1
on p.1389
1390FIGURE 2
on p.1390
1390FIGURE 3
on p.1390
1391FIGURE 4
on p.1391
1392FIGURE 5
on p.1392

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian M., ten Heggeler-Bordier B., Wahli W., Stasiak A. Z., Stasiak A., Dubochet J. Direct visualization of supercoiled DNA molecules in solution. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4551–4554. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07907.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aviles F. J., Chapman G. E., Kneale G. G., Crane-Robinson C., Bradbury E. M. The conformation of histone H5. Isolation and characterisation of the globular segment. Eur J Biochem. 1978 Aug 1;88(2):363–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banchev T., Srebreva L., Zlatanova J. Purification of histone H10 and its subfractions under non-denaturing conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Jan 23;1073(1):230–232. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(91)90208-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bavykin S. G., Usachenko S. I., Zalensky A. O., Mirzabekov A. D. Structure of nucleosomes and organization of internucleosomal DNA in chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1990 Apr 5;212(3):495–511. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90328-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bina-Stein M., Singer M. F. The effect of H1 histone on the action of DNA-relaxing enzyme. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Jan;4(1):117–127. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowater R., Aboul-Ela F., Lilley D. M. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of circular DNA topoisomers. Methods Enzymol. 1992;212:105–120. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)12007-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Böttger M., Scherneck S., Fenske H. A sedimentation study of the interaction of superhelical SV40 DNA with H1 histone. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Feb;3(2):419–429. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Böttger M., von Mickwitz C. U., Scherneck S., Grade K., Lindigkeit R. Interaction of histone H1 with superhelical DNA. Sedimentation and electron microscopical studies at low salt concentration. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Oct 24;9(20):5253–5268. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.20.5253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carnevali F., Caserta M., Di Mauro E. Transitions in topological organization of supercoiled DNA domains as a potential regulatory mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1984 Oct 25;259(20):12633–12643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark D. J., Felsenfeld G. Formation of nucleosomes on positively supercoiled DNA. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):387–395. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07960.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark D. J., Thomas J. O. Differences in the binding of H1 variants to DNA. Cooperativity and linker-length related distribution. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Dec 1;178(1):225–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark D. J., Thomas J. O. Salt-dependent co-operative interaction of histone H1 with linear DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Feb 20;187(4):569–580. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. D'Anna J. A., Strniste G. F., Gurley L. R. Circular dichroic and sedimentation studies of phosphorylated H1 from Chinese hamster cells. Biochemistry. 1979 Mar 20;18(6):942–951. doi: 10.1021/bi00573a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Bernardin W., Losa R., Koller T. Formation and characterization of soluble complexes of histone H1 with supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jun 5;189(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90320-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Draves P. H., Lowary P. T., Widom J. Co-operative binding of the globular domain of histone H5 to DNA. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jun 20;225(4):1105–1121. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90108-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goytisolo F. A., Gerchman S. E., Yu X., Rees C., Graziano V., Ramakrishnan V., Thomas J. O. Identification of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5. EMBO J. 1996 Jul 1;15(13):3421–3429. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ivanchenko M., Hassan A., van Holde K., Zlatanova J. H1 binding unwinds DNA. Evidence from topological assays. J Biol Chem. 1996 Dec 20;271(51):32580–32585. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ivanchenko M., Zlatanova J., Varga-Weisz P., Hassan A., van Holde K. Linker histones affect patterns of digestion of supercoiled plasmids by single-strand-specific nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):6970–6974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.6970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson V. Preferential binding of histones H3 and H4 to highly positively coiled DNA. Biochemistry. 1995 Aug 22;34(33):10607–10619. doi: 10.1021/bi00033a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krylov D., Leuba S., van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Histones H1 and H5 interact preferentially with crossovers of double-helical DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5052–5056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Palecek E. Local supercoil-stabilized DNA structures. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;26(2):151–226. doi: 10.3109/10409239109081126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pruss D., Bartholomew B., Persinger J., Hayes J., Arents G., Moudrianakis E. N., Wolffe A. P. An asymmetric model for the nucleosome: a binding site for linker histones inside the DNA gyres. Science. 1996 Oct 25;274(5287):614–617. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pruss D., Hayes J. J., Wolffe A. P. Nucleosomal anatomy--where are the histones? Bioessays. 1995 Feb;17(2):161–170. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ramakrishnan V., Finch J. T., Graziano V., Lee P. L., Sweet R. M. Crystal structure of globular domain of histone H5 and its implications for nucleosome binding. Nature. 1993 Mar 18;362(6417):219–223. doi: 10.1038/362219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Selvin P. R., Cook D. N., Pon N. G., Bauer W. R., Klein M. P., Hearst J. E. Torsional rigidity of positively and negatively supercoiled DNA. Science. 1992 Jan 3;255(5040):82–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1553534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sheflin L. G., Fucile N. W., Spaulding S. W. The specific interactions of HMG 1 and 2 with negatively supercoiled DNA are modulated by their acidic C-terminal domains and involve cysteine residues in their HMG 1/2 boxes. Biochemistry. 1993 Apr 6;32(13):3238–3248. doi: 10.1021/bi00064a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheflin L. G., Spaulding S. W. High mobility group protein 1 preferentially conserves torsion in negatively supercoiled DNA. Biochemistry. 1989 Jun 27;28(13):5658–5664. doi: 10.1021/bi00439a048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shure M., Vinograd J. The number of superhelical turns in native virion SV40 DNA and minicol DNA determined by the band counting method. Cell. 1976 Jun;8(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Singer D. S., Singer M. F. Characterization of complexes of superhelical and relaxed closed circular DNA with H1 and phosphorylated H1 histones. Biochemistry. 1978 May 30;17(11):2086–2095. doi: 10.1021/bi00604a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Singleton C. K., Wells R. D. The facile generation of covalently closed, circular DNAs with defined negative superhelical densities. Anal Biochem. 1982 May 15;122(2):253–257. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90277-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomas J. O., Rees C., Finch J. T. Cooperative binding of the globular domains of histones H1 and H5 to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jan 25;20(2):187–194. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsao Y. P., Wu H. Y., Liu L. F. Transcription-driven supercoiling of DNA: direct biochemical evidence from in vitro studies. Cell. 1989 Jan 13;56(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90989-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Varga-Weisz P., Zlatanova J., Leuba S. H., Schroth G. P., van Holde K. Binding of histones H1 and H5 and their globular domains to four-way junction DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):3525–3529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Varga-Weisz P., van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Preferential binding of histone H1 to four-way helical junction DNA. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 5;268(28):20699–20700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vogel T., Singer M. F. Interaction of f1 histone with superhelical DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2597–2600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vogel T., Singer M. F. The effect of superhelicity on the interaction of histone f1 with closed circular duplex DNA. J Biol Chem. 1976 Apr 25;251(8):2334–2338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogel T., Singer M. The interaction of histones with simian virus 40 supercoiled circular deoxyribonucleic acid in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1975 Jan 25;250(2):796–798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vologodskii A. V., Cozzarelli N. R. Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:609–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vologodskii A. V., Levene S. D., Klenin K. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M., Cozzarelli N. R. Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol. 1992 Oct 20;227(4):1224–1243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90533-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vologodskii A., Cozzarelli N. R. Effect of supercoiling on the juxtaposition and relative orientation of DNA sites. Biophys J. 1996 Jun;70(6):2548–2556. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79826-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang J. C. Variation of the average rotation angle of the DNA helix and the superhelical turns of covalently closed cyclic lambda DNA. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jul 14;43(1):25–39. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yaneva J., Zlatanova J., Paneva E., Srebreva L., Tsanev R. Interaction of histones H1 and H1(0) with superhelical and linear DNA. FEBS Lett. 1990 Apr 24;263(2):225–228. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81379-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zlatanova J., Van Holde K. Histone H1 and transcription: still an enigma? J Cell Sci. 1992 Dec;103(Pt 4):889–895. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.4.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zlatanova J., Yaneva J. Histone H1-DNA interactions and their relation to chromatin structure and function. DNA Cell Biol. 1991 May;10(4):239–248. doi: 10.1089/dna.1991.10.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zlatanova J., van Holde K. The linker histones and chromatin structure: new twists. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1996;52:217–259. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60968-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES