Skip to main content
Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Open Forum logoLink to Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Open Forum
. 2024 Nov 11;6:ojae108. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae108

Finesse in Gender Affirming Frontal Contouring With Corrugator Resection

Kevin G Hu 1, Jacqueline Ihnat 1, Neil Parikh 1, Melanie Vassallo 1, Mariana Almeida 1, David P Alper 1, Alexandre Prassinos 1, Ali Aral 1, Tito Vasquez 1, Michael Alperovich 1,
PMCID: PMC11852261  PMID: 40007598

Abstract

 

Given the significance of forehead aesthetics to facial gender identification, frontal sinus setback and brow contouring are frequent components of facial feminization surgery (FFS) in transgender female patients. This study presents a safe and reliable technique for corrugator muscle resection during FFS to provide enhanced feminization of the forehead. This technique was performed in 12 patients between 27 and 58 years of age. Following bone reduction and sinus setback, the corrugator is located on the undersurface of the forehead flap and dissected through the reflected soft tissue of the forehead, with care taken to protect the supraorbital nerve. Patient satisfaction and complications, such as infection, poor wound healing, scarring, and desire for revision surgery, were assessed at follow-up visits. All patients showed improved feminization of the forehead. No complications were reported intraoperatively or postoperatively, and no patients required hospitalization beyond the expected overnight admission. No patients reported anesthesia or hypoesthesia in the distribution of the supraorbital nerve at 6 months postoperatively. Patients reported high satisfaction with their FFS outcomes. In conclusion, performing corrugator resection in conjunction with FFS is a safe and rapid technique that may significantly enhance the feminizing effects on the forehead of frontal sinus setback and brow contouring.

Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic)

graphic file with name ojae108il1.jpg


The fronto-orbito-nasal complex is the facial region most responsible for correct gender identification and consequently a main focus area in facial feminization surgery (FFS).1-3 Bony modifications typically include burring and frontal sinus setback to achieve forehead feminization.4 Addressing the corrugator supercilii muscle, responsible for brow furrowing, is a soft-tissue adjunct for further feminization, especially due to its greater likelihood of hypertrophy and increased mass in patients assigned male at birth.5,6 Corrugator resection in the context of FFS has been described in the literature only once before.7 In this article, the authors describe their technique for frontal contouring with corrugator resection as a component of FFS.

METHODS

Corrugator supercilii resection is performed with frontal sinus setback and brow contouring/lifting. A traditional trichophytic incision is made descending to the subperiosteal plane, with further dissection progressing caudally to the supraorbital rim. The supraorbital bundle is identified and protected. An osteotomy may be performed to free the supraorbital bundle in patients with a supraorbital foramen; in patients with a notch, the neurovascular bundle is reflected downwards. Frontal sinus setback and brow contouring are performed in the typical fashion prior to corrugator resection (Video).

Corrugator muscle position is estimated relative to the medial brow superior to the orbital rim. Blunt dissection of the subgaleal layer and targeted electrocautery reveal the deep surface of the corrugator muscle with oblique muscle fibers. Supraorbital bundle branches are identified and reflected away as they course lateral to the dissection site. The muscle is isolated and resected with electrocautery. Continued resection of the corrugator laterally further reduces brow volume and decreases the likelihood of recurrent corrugator hypertrophy. Further brow flattening can be achieved by resecting the depressor supercilii superficial and medial to the corrugator.

Once resection is completed, brow lift and hairline reduction are performed, followed by skin closure in the traditional fashion. A 10-flat JP drain is placed in the subgaleal scalp. Patients are observed in the hospital overnight and the drain removed before discharge.

This retrospective study was exempt from IRB review due to its noninterventional nature. It adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients for their procedures and use of data and images for research and publication.

RESULTS

Twelve patients aged 27 to 58 years underwent FFS with corrugator resection at a single institution by a single surgeon (Table 1). All patients had at least 1 year of hormone replacement therapy and lived as their experienced gender prior to surgery. No patients received botulinum toxin treatments before FFS. Corrugator resection added <10 min of operative time in all patients.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics and Procedures Received

Patient number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Age 41 32 36 29 27 49 36 33 40 21 46 58
>1 year HRT
>1 year as gender
Past GAS
 Top surgery
 Bottom surgery
Procedures received
 Frontal sinus setback
 Corrugator resection
 Brow lift
 Brow contouring
 Hairline reduction
 Rhinoplasty
 Lip lift
 Genioplasty
 Chondrolaryngoplasty
 Gonial angle reduction

GAS, gender affirmation surgery; HRT, hormone replacement therapy.

After surgery, the forehead is more uniformly convex, particularly at the brow (Figure 1), and all patients reported satisfaction with forehead appearance postoperatively. The average follow-up time was 8.8 ± 2.0 months, and no patients reported complications, infections, asymmetry, or loss of sensation of the forehead or brow.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The comparison of profile views of the forehead (A) before and (B) after facial feminization surgery. The forehead after corrugator resection has a smoothly convex profile, in contrast to the discrete step-off present at the brow in the before picture.

DISCUSSION

Upper-third FFS reduces masculine features through bony modifications, including frontal sinus setback, forehead burring, and supraorbital burring,4 and soft-tissue modification, such as hairline advancement and brow lifts.8 Corrugator resection also feminizes the forehead and brow in transgender females. These results show that corrugator resection is a safe adjunct to FFS, as the risk presented to the supraorbital nerve and the orbit is similar to other upper-third bony contouring procedures. The increased access available through a coronal or trichophytic incision, compared with the more common transpalpebral approach for facial rejuvenation, further enhances this technique's safety profile.9,10

Corrugator resection reduces glabellar prominence and decreases supraorbital concavity, creating a more feminine convex forehead (Figure 2). Corrugator resection can decrease glabellar volume by about 3 mL, with fat grafting as an option to smooth out irregularities in glabellar shape.9 Resection also elevates and feminizes the brow by diminishing brow furrowing and depression. Specifically, while masculine brows are horizontal and at the supraorbital ridge, feminine brows typically begin medially at or inferior to the supraorbital ridge and ascend laterally with a peak between the middle and lateral thirds.8,11

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The profile view of the forehead at a 6-month follow-up visit for 2 transgender female patients, aged 41 and 29. Note the increased continuous convexity of the forehead and decreased brow furrowing after surgery (B, D) compared with before surgery (A, C).

Corrugator resection also decreases forehead rhytids, simultaneously feminizing and de-aging the forehead.12,13 More prominent horizontal rhytids of the forehead in males have been attributed to increased frontalis activation to compensate for corrugator hypertrophy and a lower brow.14,15 Diminishing excessive frontalis activation reduces rhytids, a particularly desirable effect in older patients. Although chemodenervation with botulinum toxin in the corrugator achieves the same effect, it is temporary and costly.13 Corrugator resection can thus be a more economical treatment for patients who would otherwise seek frequent chemodenervation.

Corrugator resection achieves optimal outcomes in concert with several different procedures, including brow lift and hairline reduction to achieve facial harmony and aesthetic improvement (Table 1). Corrugator resection amplifies these effects, especially at the medial brow. Overresection may lead to excessive brow elevation and a “surprised” look, although no patients in this series expressed this concern (Figure 3).16 Thus, discussing the patient's aesthetic goals given their preoperative facial features is critical.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Frontal view of the forehead at a 6-month follow-up visit for 2 transgender female patients, aged 41 and 29. Note the reduction in glabellar lines without the manifestation of a “surprised look” due to excessive frontalis activation after surgery (B, D) compared with before surgery (A, C).

Corrugator resection also represents an opportunity for migraine treatment in a unique patient population. Transgender females on hormone replacement therapy experience migraines at the elevated level of cisgender females,17 likely through changes in neuroexcitability and pain perception.18 Concurrent removal of the supratrochlear and supraorbital arteries can significantly improve migraine symptoms.9

This work is limited by a relatively short follow-up period, a small patient sample, concurrent frontal sinus setback, and the use of nonstandardized measures of patient satisfaction. Future studies should focus on quantifying the change attributable to corrugator resection alone.

This technique is rapid, adding ∼10 min of operative time, and convenient, requiring no additional incisions and minimal additional dissection. We now offer corrugator resection routinely as part of our complement of upper-third gender-affirming procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Corrugator resection is an adjunct to FFS that may offer enhanced forehead feminization in conjunction with classical techniques such as frontal sinus setback and brow contouring. By taking advantage of an existing hairline trichophytic incision, this procedure is both safe and rapid, yielding improved forehead aesthetics without increased cost or risk to the patient.

Acknowledgments

Mr Hu and Ms Ihnat contributed equally as first authors.

Disclosures

Dr Alperovich consults for Johnson & Johnson (New Brunswick, NJ) and LifeNet Health (Virginia Beach, VA).

Funding

Dr Alperovich received funding from CTSA grant number KL2 TR001862 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). His research was partially funded by a Plastic Surgery Foundation Craniomaxillofacial Research Grant. The manuscript contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH or the Plastic Surgery Foundation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Capitán L, Simon D, Kaye K, Tenorio T. Facial feminization surgery: the forehead. Surgical techniques and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:609–619. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Louis M, Travieso R, Oles N, Coon D. Narrative review of facial gender surgery: approaches and techniques for the frontal sinus and upper third of the face. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9:606. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spiegel JH. Facial determinants of female gender and feminizing forehead cranioplasty. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:250–261. doi: 10.1002/lary.21187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gibstein AR, Jabori SK, Danker S. Facial feminization surgery: part 1 of the plastic surgeon's perspective of gender-affirming surgery. Plast Aesthet Nurs. 2022;42:137–142. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kane MAC, Brandt F, Rohrich RJ, et al. Evaluation of variable-dose treatment with a new U.S. botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1619–1629. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b5641b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Monheit G, Lin X, Nelson D, Kane M. Consideration of muscle mass in glabellar line treatment with botulinum toxin type A. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:1041–1045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Villepelet A, Jafari A, Baujat B. Fronto-orbital feminization technique. A surgical strategy using fronto-orbital burring with or without eggshell technique to optimize the risk/benefit ratio. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135:353–356. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Somenek M, Romero NJ. Brow lift and brow position for gender affirmation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2022;55:797–808. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2022.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guyuron B, Son JH. Transpalpebral corrugator resection: 25-year experience, refinements and additional indications. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41:339–345. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0780-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hamas RS. Reducing the subconscious frown by endoscopic resection of the corrugator muscles. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1995;19:21–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00209306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sykes JM, Dilger AE, Sinclair A. Surgical facial esthetics for gender affirmation. Dermatol Clin. 2020;38:261–268. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Starkman SJ, Sherris DA. Association of corrugator supercilii and procerus myectomy with endoscopic browlift outcomes. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21:375–380. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ascha M, Swanson MA, Massie JP, et al. Nonsurgical management of facial masculinization and feminization. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:NP123–NP137. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Maio M. Ethnic and gender considerations in the use of facial injectables: male patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:40S–43S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cotofana S, Freytag DL, Frank K, et al. The bidirectional movement of the frontalis muscle: introducing the line of convergence and its potential clinical relevance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:1155–1162. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knize DM, Rohrich RJ. Limited incision foreheadplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:285–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pringsheim T, Gooren L. Migraine prevalence in male to female transsexuals on hormone therapy. Neurology. 2004;63:593–594. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000130338.62037.cc [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martinez CI, Liktor-Busa E, Largent-Milnes TM. Molecular mechanisms of hormones implicated in migraine and the translational implication for transgender patients. Front Pain Res. 2023;4:1117842. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1117842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Open Forum are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES