Skip to main content
Current Issues in Molecular Biology logoLink to Current Issues in Molecular Biology
. 2025 Feb 8;47(2):107. doi: 10.3390/cimb47020107

Mitochondrial Genome Characteristics and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Spartina alterniflora

Hong Zhu 1,2, Chunlei Yue 1,2,*, Hepeng Li 1,2
Editor: Quan Zou
PMCID: PMC11854523  PMID: 39996828

Abstract

The mitochondrial genome of Spartina alterniflora, an invasive species with significant ecological and economic impacts, was analyzed to provide a theoretical basis for understanding its phylogenetic relationships and molecular biology. Mitochondrial genome sequences of S. alterniflora and 23 related species from NCBI were utilized for bioinformatics and comparative genomic analyses. A sliding window analysis identified three genes (rps2, atp9, and nad6) as potential DNA barcodes for species identification. Intracellular gene transfer (IGT) events between mitochondrial and chloroplast genome were detected, highlighting the dynamic nature of genomic evolution. A selective pressure analysis revealed that most protein-coding genes (PCGs) underwent purifying selection (Ka/Ks < 1), while the nad2 and ccmB genes showed signs of positive selection pressure (Ka/Ks > 1), indicating their role in adaptation. A phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close relationship between S. alterniflora and Eleusine indica, supported by a collinearity analysis, which suggests environmental convergence. This study provides novel insights into the structural and evolutionary characteristics of the S. alterniflora mitochondrial genome, offering valuable genomic resources for future research on invasive species management and evolutionary biology.

Keywords: Spartina alterniflora, mitochondrial genome, comparative analysis, phylogenetic analysis

1. Introduction

Spartina alterniflora Loisel. (synonyms: S. maritima var. Alterniflora, S. stricta var. Alterniflora, etc.) is a perennial grass of the genus Spartina in the Poaceae family. Native to the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the Americas, this species holds ecological and economical significance. Historically, it has been utilized for coastal stabilization, wetland restoration, and soil erosion control due to its robust root system and rapid growth. Additionally, S. alterniflora contributes to carbon sequestration in coastal ecosystems, with its dense biomass acting as a significant carbon sink [1]. However, its invasive proliferation in non-native regions, such as China’s coastal zones, has overshadowed these benefits, posing a significant threat to ecosystems, biodiversity maintenance, and the ecological security of most coastal marsh wetlands [2,3]. Consequently, it has been included in the initial catalog of alien invasive species by the National Environmental Protection Agency of China (https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/zj/wj/200910/t20091022_172155.htm/, accessed on 11 April 2024).

Mitochondria are essential organelles in eukaryotic cells, playing a central role in oxidative metabolism, energy synthesis, and physiological processes, such as cellular signal transduction, cell division, differentiation, and apoptosis regulation [4,5]. Plant mitochondrial genomes exhibit remarkable structural diversity and complexity, including polycyclic chromosomes, linear branches, and radial structures [6]. Their sizes ranging from approximately 66 kb to 11.7 Mb and often exist as dynamic, multipartite structures due to frequent recombination mediated by repeat sequences [7,8]. However, the difficulty associated with assembly and high costs of sequencing pose significant challenges to research on plant mitochondria [9,10,11]. With advancement in genomics and sequencing technologies, particularly third-generation sequencing technologies, an increasing number of mitochondrial genomes have been successfully assembled. Species such as Oryza sativa L., Triticum aestivum L., and Lolium perenne L., all belonging to the Poaceae family, have been reported successively. Researchers have systematically investigated research on sequence characteristics, genome structure, and phylogenetic relationships, among other aspects [12,13,14]. For invasive plants like S. alterniflora, while the organellar genomes have been sequenced, existing reports have only provided basic information, such as the total mitochondrial genome length (566,328 bp), G + C content, and structural annotation [15,16].

Biological invasions drive environmental changes, potentially endangering local biodiversity, human health, and agricultural and forestry economies [17]. In recent years, mitochondrial genomics has emerged as a valuable research tool, particularly the study of mitochondrial genome dynamics, which provides new insights into the genetic factors underlying invasion success and adaptive evolution [18]. Currently, an in-depth analysis of the mitochondrial genome characteristics and comparative genomics of S. alterniflora has not been conducted. Numerous research aspects, including the origin of organellar genomes, the evolution of nuclear–cytoplasmic interactions, structural complexity, and recombination events remain unknown. Therefore, conducting mitochondrial genome research on S. alterniflora can enrich the mitochondrial genome information of plants in the Poaceae family and provide essential foundational information for molecular systematics and molecular ecology research on S. alterniflora. In this study, we retrieved the mitochondrial genome sequences of S. alterniflora and its 23 related species from public databases. Meanwhile, we conducted a comprehensive analysis regarding nucleotide diversity, migration sequences, Ka/Ks analysis, and comparative genomics. The goal is to explore genomic structural and functional information to deepen our understanding of this species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

To elucidate the evolutionary status of the S. alterniflora mitochondrial genome, mitochondrial genome sequences of this species and 23 related plants were retrieved from the NCBI Organelle Genome Resources database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/organelle/ accessed on 22 April 2024). The selection criteria were guided by phylogenetic proximity, data availability as well as ecological and functional diversity. A systematic phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using mitochondrial genome data from a single S. alterniflora specimen (GenBank accession number: MT471321) publicly available on NCBI, alongside data from 23 related plants. The final dataset included 21 Poales species (20 from the Poaceae family and one from the Cyperaceae family) and an outgroup consisting of three species (one from the Asparagaceae family and two from the Arecaceae family).

2.2. Nucleotide Diversity Analysis

The MAFFT software ver. 7.427 (-auto mode) [19] was used to perform a global alignment of shared protein-coding genes (PCGs) from different species. Sliding window analysis was conducted using DnaSP ver. 5 software [20] to calculate the nucleotide diversity (Pi) value for each gene.

2.3. Intergenomic Sequence Transfers Analysis

The chloroplast genome sequence (GenBank accession number: MT311317) of S. alterniflora were download from the NCBI organelle genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/organelle/ accessed on 22 April 2024). The BLAST software was utilized to search for homologous sequences between the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes, with the filtering criteria set at a match identity of ≥70% and an E-value of ≤1 × 10−5. To visually represent the transfer of genomic fragments between the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes, we used the circos ver. 0.69-5 software (http://circos.ca/software/download/ accessed on 25 April 2024) for visualization.

2.4. Ka/Ks Analysis

The ratio of non-synonymous substitutions (Ka) to synonymous substitutions (Ks) was analyzed based on 31 PCGs in the S. alterniflora mitochondrial genome, with pairwise comparisons between all species. Gene sequence alignment was conducted using the MAFFT ver. 7.427 software [19], and the Ka/Ks values for each gene were calculated using the KaKs_Calculator ver. 2.0 software [21] with the MLWL model. Finally, a box plot summarizing the Ka/Ks values for each gene was generated.

2.5. Phylogenetic Tree Construction

The mitochondrial genomes of 24 representative plants from 18 genera of 4 families in 3 orders were downloaded from NCBI. The coding sequences (CDS) were selected to construct a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. The sequences between species were aligned using MAFFT ver. 7.427 software (–auto mode) [19], and the aligned sequences were concatenated. The optimal nucleotide substitution model was determined using jModelTest ver. 2.1.10 software [22]. The GTRGAMMA model was employed in RAxML ver. 8.2.10 software [23] with a Bootstrap value of 1000 to evaluate the maximum likelihood method for building the phylogenetic tree.

2.6. Synteny Analysis

The genome sequences were aligned using MUMmer (ver. 4.0.0 beta2) software [24] with the maxmatch parameter to generate dot-plot plots. The x-axis in each box represents the assembled sequence, while the y-axis represents the other sequences. The red lines inside the boxes indicate forward matches, and the blue lines indicate reverse complementary matches.

3. Results

3.1. Nucleotide Diversity of the S. alterniflora mt Genome

Nucleotide diversity (Pi) can be used to evaluate the variation of nucleic acid sequences among different species. Therefore, selecting regions with higher variation can serve as potential molecular markers. The total number of mutations in 36 genes ranges from 0 to 399, with corresponding Pi values between 0.000 and 0.245, most of which are less than 0.100. Among these, the rRNA gene coding for ribosomal RNA, rrn5, has the lowest variability (Pi = 0.000). In contrast, the variable gene coding for the ribosomal small subunit, rps2, has the highest variability (Pi = 0.245). The core genes, atp9 (coding for ATP synthase) with a Pi of 0.070 and nad6 (coding for NADH dehydrogenase) with a Pi of 0.060, also exhibit slightly higher variability and can be considered as candidate DNA barcoding markers for further research on phylogeny and population genetics of the species (Figure 1). These findings suggest that rps2, atp9, and nad6 may serve as candidates for DNA barcoding, enabling rapid and accurate identification of S. alterniflora in mixed populations, which is critical for monitoring and controlling its invasive spread.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sliding window analysis for the nucleotide diversity (Pi) of S. alterniflora.

3.2. Intergenomic Sequence Transfers of S. alterniflora

Through a sequence similarity analysis, homologous fragments between the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes of S. alterniflora were detected, revealing extensive interorganellar sequence transfer events. A total of 46 homologous fragments were identified (Figure 2; Table 1), with lengths ranging from 32 to 3203 bp, of which 8 exceed 1000 bp. The total length of the homologous sequences is 28,860 bp, with 28,475 bp located in the chloroplast genome’s repeat regions and 14,962 bp in the mitochondrial genome’s repeat regions. There are 5 protein-coding genes (PCGs) (ndhJ, psaB, rpl2, rpl23, and rps7) and 12 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes (trnM-CAT, trnH-GTG, trnF-GAA, trnR-TCT, trnS-GGA, trnP-TGG, trnC-GCA, trnW-CCA, trnN-GTT, trnN-GTT, and trnM-CAT) found to be completely located within the homologous sequences between the mitochondrial genome and nuclear genome of S. alterniflora. These homologous fragments are referred to as mitochondrial plastid DNAs (MTPTs), signifying chloroplasts to mitochondria transfer [25]. The CP-derived sequences contributed substantially to mitochondrial genomic diversity, consistent with prior studies highlighting species-specific variation in MTPT length and composition. However, the mechanisms driving sequence migration between the genomes and the expression of genes within the migrated sequences remain unknown, warranting further investigation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of homologous fragments between mitochondria and chloroplasts in S. alterniflora.

Table 1.

Homologous fragments between mitochondria and chloroplasts in S. alterniflora.

No. Aligened Length (bp) Sequence Identity (%) Mismatches Gap Opens Chloroplast Genome (CP) Mitochondrial Genome (MT) Contained Genes
Start End Start End
1 3203 99.657 6 1 80,973 84,170 196,986 193,784 trnM-CAT; trnH-GTG
2 3203 99.657 6 1 132,219 135,416 193,784 196,986 trnM-CAT; trnH-GTG
3 3007 99.734 2 2 37,454 40,460 258,992 261,992
4 1709 99.649 2 1 126,698 128,406 565,996 564,292
5 1709 99.649 2 1 87,983 89,691 564,292 565,996
6 2166 86.888 147 58 48,194 50,273 357,558 355,444 trnF-GAA
7 1297 98.227 20 2 35,467 36,761 203,241 201,946 trnR-TCT
8 1034 87.041 84 23 51,282 52,304 201,390 200,396
9 585 99.658 1 1 95,399 95,982 389,831 389,247
10 585 99.658 1 1 120,407 120,990 389,247 389,831
11 825 84.848 70 23 44,149 44,951 359,302 358,511
12 522 93.678 19 4 622 1137 85,462 85,975
13 486 93.621 27 2 36,772 37,253 201,889 201,404
14 532 87.030 51 7 110,463 110,982 592 67
15 532 87.030 51 7 110,463 110,982 543,296 542,771
16 453 87.417 41 10 5324 5768 101,801 102,245
17 258 99.225 1 1 56,844 57,100 194,757 195,014
18 410 81.463 36 17 45,103 45,487 358,312 357,918 trnS-GGA
19 238 89.916 11 8 64,331 64,567 436,134 436,359 trnP-TGG
20 889 73.566 180 41 123,201 124,064 73,559 72,701 rrnS (partical:43.63%)
21 889 73.566 180 41 92,325 93,188 72,701 73,559 rrnS (partical:43.63%)
22 889 73.566 180 41 92,325 93,188 463,240 462,382 rrnS (partical:43.63%)
23 889 73.566 180 41 123,201 124,064 462,382 463,240 rrnS (partical:43.63%)
24 155 97.419 3 1 41,618 41,772 258,998 258,845
25 148 97.973 3 0 23,448 23,595 324,214 324,067
26 226 86.726 29 1 97,053 97,277 327,985 327,760
27 226 86.726 29 1 119,112 119,336 327,760 327,985
28 145 93.793 8 1 45,141 45,284 40,212 40,356 trnS-GGA (partical:86.52%)
29 182 87.363 11 6 121,318 121,499 212,946 212,777
30 182 87.363 11 6 94,890 95,071 212,777 212,946
31 152 87.500 10 6 18,689 18,839 213,562 213,705 trnC-GCA
32 93 97.849 1 1 117,548 117,640 450,821 450,730
33 93 97.849 1 1 98,749 98,841 450,730 450,821
34 123 87.805 13 2 64,133 64,254 435,907 436,028 trnW-CCA
35 81 97.531 2 0 99,799 99,879 188,235 188,155 trnN-GTT
36 81 97.531 2 0 116,510 116,590 188,155 188,235 trnN-GTT
37 76 92.105 5 1 52,299 52,373 381,683 381,608 trnM-CAT
38 97 82.474 17 0 96,206 96,302 248,985 248,889 rrnL (partical:2.73%)
39 97 82.474 17 0 120,087 120,183 248,889 248,985 rrnL (partical:2.73%)
40 97 82.474 17 0 96,206 96,302 504,491 504,395
41 97 82.474 17 0 120,087 120,183 504,395 504,491
42 63 88.889 5 2 12,949 13,011 201,726 201,666
43 32 100 0 0 99,400 99,431 162,713 162,682
44 32 100 0 0 116,958 116,989 162,682 162,713
45 35 97.143 0 1 103,130 103,163 48,940 48,974
46 37 94.595 1 1 8068 8104 358,125 358,160 trnS-GGA (partical:41.38%)
Total 28,860

3.3. Selective Pressure Analysis

Calculating the mean Ka/Ks can assess the selective pressure in the evolutionary dynamics of protein-coding genes (PCGs) among related species. In the case of neutral selection, Ka/Ks = 1. When Ka/Ks > 1, it indicates positive selection, while Ka/Ks < 1 indicates purifying selection [26]. By comparing the 31 PCGs in the mitochondrial genome of S. alterniflora with those of related species, we observed that the Ka/Ks values ranged from 0.097 to 1.473. Among these, nad2 (1.473 ± 0.818) and ccmB (1.090 ± 0.470) have mean Ka/Ks values greater than 1, indicating that they are under positive selection, while the remaining 28 PCGs have mean values less than 1, suggesting they are subject to purifying selection (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Boxplots of the pairwise Ka/Ks values among every shared mitochondrial gene of S. alterniflora.

3.4. Phylogenetic Inference

The phylogenetic tree demonstrates a significant divergence between the outgroup and the Poaceae, with a support value of 100%. The 14 taxonomic units within the Poaceae are well clustered. The target species, S. alterniflora, forms a distinct subtree with Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn., belonging to the genus Eleusine, and is sister to a small clade comprising six genera: Zea, Tripsacum, Coix, Sorghum, Eremochloa, and Chrysopogon. Additionally, Cyperus esculentus L. from the genus Cyperus is positioned at the base of the Poaceae, characterized by the longest branch length, thereby strongly supporting the separation between the Cyperaceae and Poaceae families (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed based on CDS sequences for 24 species. Numbers at each node represent bootstrap support values. The accession number in blue color following the species name corresponds to the GenBank accession number.

3.5. Sequence Collinearity

In the Poaceae, mitochondrial gene sequence synteny analysis was randomly conducted with Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, Triticum aestivum L., E. indica, Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty, Agrostis stolonifera L., and Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack. alongside S. alterniflora. The results of the dot-plot analysis showed that among all pairwise comparisons of the plants, the homologous sequences between S. alterniflora and E. indica were the longest, accounting for 56.25% and 57.60% of their respective chloroplast genomes. This indicates the highest similarity and a close genetic relationship between the two species (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A collinearity analysis of S. alterniflora compared to six typical species in Poaceae. The horizontal coordinate in each box indicates the assembled sequence, the vertical coordinate indicates the other sequences, the value in parentheses is the proportion of homologous sequences to the total genome, the red line in the box indicates the forward alignment, and the blue line indicates the reverse complementary alignment.

4. Discussion

During the evolution of higher plants, there has been extensive exchange between the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes, a process known as intracellular gene transfer (IGT) [11,27]. It is hypothesized that IGT occurred as early as the endosymbiotic events that led to the evolution of eukaryotic chloroplasts. This gene transfer process facilitates information exchange and gene recombination between genomes, contributing to the emergence of new genomic structures and functions, thereby enhancing species’ adaptation to varying environmental conditions and survival pressures [28]. IGT is widely regarded as one of the most important driving forces of species evolution [25]. As the number of complete mitochondrial genomes increases, more instances of IGT have been discovered. In this study, approximately 19.15% (25,959 bp) of MTPTs were found in the chloroplast genome, whereas only 3.56% (20,140 bp) of MTPTs were present in the mitochondria, indicating that transfer from chloroplasts is more common than from mitochondria. Sequence transfers between genomes has been ongoing, primarily involving the transfer of non-functional DNA [29]. Although many organelle-derived sequences are inactive or non-functional, there are exceptions, some organelle genes transferred to the host cell nucleus can enhance the host cell’s ability to regulate organelle gene expression [30]. Additionally, tRNA genes are transferred more frequently than PCGs, similar to findings in Ilex metabaptista Loes. ex Diels [31] and Punica granatum L. [32], indicating that tRNA genes are more conserved in mitochondrial genomes and play an irreplaceable role in mitochondria. In summary, studying IGT is crucial for tracing ancient recombination events and structural variations in plant mitochondrial genomes. However, current explanations of its mechanisms remain at the hypothesis stage. Future research could focus on how the organelle transfer processes in S. alterniflora contribute to environmental stress tolerance.

Through a selection pressure analysis, we can gain a deeper understanding of the roles and evolutionary processes of protein-coding genes, providing important clues to unravel the mechanisms underlying species adaptive evolution [31]. The Ka/Ks statistical results indicate that most variant genes have undergone purifying selection, consistent with studies on species such as Suaeda glauca (Bunge) Bunge [33], Bupleurum chinense DC. [34], and Cymbidium ensifolium (L.) Sw. [35], suggesting that PCGs in the mitochondrial genome are conserved. In contrast, the nad2 and ccmB genes showed signs of positive selection pressure, suggesting their role in adaptation. These findings are consistent with previous studies on other invasive species, indicating that positive selection of energy metabolism-related genes may be a common strategy for successful invasion. The nad2 gene, also known as mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2, encodes a subunit of NADH dehydrogenase complex I in mitochondria. Its role is to transfer electrons to coenzyme Q within the mitochondrial respiratory chain, thereby generating energy to support cellular metabolism and survival. Studies have shown that mutations or adaptive evolution in nad2 can enhance the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation, particularly under environmental stressors such as hypoxia or salinity [36]. The ccmB gene encodes a component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex, which regulates electron transfer in the electron transport chain and ultimately promotes ATP production, playing a crucial role in maintaining plant respiration and energy generation [37]. Therefore, it is inferred that these two energy metabolism-related genes underwent positive selection during the evolution of S. alterniflora to adapt to complex coastal environmental changes, thus sustaining the species’ strong invasive capability and reproductive success. However, further experiments are needed to validate the functions of these key genes through gene annotation and enrichment analyses.

With the ongoing development of high-throughput sequencing technology, the study of phylogenetic relationships has progressively shifted to the genomic level. The topological results of the phylogenetic clustering based on the mitochondrial genome in this study are largely consistent with the classification established by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG), indicating that utilization information obtained from mitochondrial genomes for plant phylogenetic research is feasible. Wang et al. [16] constructed a maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on 15 mitochondrial genes and suggested that the closest relationship exists between S. alterniflora and S. bicolor. Building on this foundation, our study expanded the dataset to include 24 sequenced mitochondrial genomes and similarly employed the ML method for phylogenetic reconstruction. The phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close evolutionary relationship between S. alterniflora and E. indica, which was further supported by the results of synteny visualized through a dot-plot analysis. This finding is particularly interesting, as it suggests a shared ancestry or convergent evolution under similar environmental pressures (e.g., coastal/ruderal habitats). Both species thrive in disturbed or marginal habitats (e.g., coastal zones for S. alterniflora and ruderal environments for E. indica). However, due to the lack of sufficiently representative mitochondrial genomes for the genus Spartina, it is necessary to obtain additional mitochondrial genomes in the future to better address phylogenetic and evolutionary biology issues concerning this species.

5. Conclusions

This study conducted bioinformatics and comparative genomic analyses of S. alterniflora and related species based on publicly available mitochondrial genome sequences. The analyses included nucleotide polymorphism, intracellular gene transfer, Ka/Ks ratios, and a synteny analysis. Additionally, a phylogenetic reconstruction of the coding region sequences from 24 plant mitochondrial genomes further validated the phylogenetic position of S. alterniflora. The comprehensive analysis of the structure and function of the mitochondrial genome of S. alterniflora, along with the identification of potential molecular markers, contributes to a deeper understanding of the genomic evolution of this invasive species. These findings not only provide valuable genomic resources for future research on invasive species management but also offer potential targets for the development of novel control strategies. Future studies should focus on the functional validation of the identified candidate genes and their role in the invasive success of S. alterniflora.

Acknowledgments

We thank Genepioneer Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) for providing technical assistance.

Author Contributions

H.Z. collected data and wrote the original draft. C.Y. and H.L. reviewed and edited the manuscript. C.Y. and H.L. acquired funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences of complete mitogenomes of S. alterniflora can be available in NCBI (accession number: MT311317).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang (grant No. 2024C02002); Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology Project (grant No. 2022SY06).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Zhang D., Hu Y., Liu M., Chang Y., Yan X., Bu R., Zhao D., Li Z. Introduction and spread of an exotic plant, Spartina alterniflora, along coastal marshes of China. Wetlands. 2017;37:1181–1193. doi: 10.1007/s13157-017-0950-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cui L., Berger U., Cao M., Zhang Y., He J., Pan L., Jiang J. Conservation and restoration of mangroves in response to invasion of Spartina alterniflora based on the MaxEnt model: A case study in China. Forests. 2023;14:1220. doi: 10.3390/f14061220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zheng J., Wei H., Chen R., Liu J., Wang L., Gu W. Invasive trends of Spartina Alterniflora in the southeastern Coast of China and potential distributional impacts on mangrove forests. Plants. 2023;12:1923. doi: 10.3390/plants12101923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hammani K., Giegé P. RNA metabolism in plant mitochondria. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:380–389. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Madreiter-Sokolowski C.T., Ramadani-Muja J., Ziomek G., Burgstaller S., Bischof H., Koshenov Z., Gottschalk B., Malli R., Graier W.F. Tracking intra-and inter-organelle signaling of mitochondria. FEBS J. 2019;286:4378–4401. doi: 10.1111/febs.15103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kong J., Wang J., Nie L., Tembrock L.R., Zou C., Kan S., Ma X., Wendel J.F., Wu Z. Evolutionary dynamics of mitochondrial genomes and intracellular transfers among diploid and allopolyploid cotton species. BMC Biol. 2025;23:9. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02115-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Skippington E., Barkman J., Rice D.W., Palmer J.D. Miniaturized mitogenome of the parasitic plant Viscum scurruloideum is extremely divergent and dynamic and has lost all nad genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E3515–E3524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504491112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Putintseva Y.A., Bondar E.I., Simonov E.P., Sharov V.V., Oreshkova N.V., Kuzmin D.A., Konstantinov Y.M., Shmakov V.N., Belkov V.I., Sadovsky M.G., et al. Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) mitochondrial genome assembled using both short and long nucleotide sequence reads is currently the largest known mitogenome. BMC Genom. 2020;21:654. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07061-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jackman S.D., Coombe L., Warren R.L., Kirk H., Trinh E., MacLeod T., Pleasance S., Pandoh P., Zhao Y., Coope R.J., et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of a gymnosperm, Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), indicates a complex physical structure. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020;12:1174–1179. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaa108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang S., Wang J., He W., Kan S., Liao X., Jordan D.R., Mace E.S., Tao Y., Cruickshank A.W., Klein R., et al. Variation in mitogenome structural conformation in wild and cultivated lineages of sorghum corresponds with domestication history and plastome evolution. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23:91. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04104-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang J., Kan S., Liao X., Zhou J., Tembrock L.R., Daniell H., Jin S., Wu Z. Plant organellar genomes: Much done, much more to do. Trends Plant Sci. 2024;29:754–769. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Notsu Y., Masood S., Nishikawa T., Kubo N., Akiduki G., Nakazono M., Hirai A., Kadowaki K. The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: Frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2002;268:434–445. doi: 10.1007/s00438-002-0767-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cui P., Liu H., Lin Q., Ding F., Zhou G., Hu S., Liu D., Yang D., Zhan K., Zhang A., et al. A complete mitochondrial genome of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Yumai), and fast evolving mitochondrial genes in higher plants. J. Genet. 2009;88:299–307. doi: 10.1007/s12041-009-0043-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Islam M.S., Studer B., Byrne S.L., Farrell J.D., Panitz F., Bendixen C., Møller I.M., Asp T. The genome and transcriptome of perennial ryegrass mitochondria. BMC Genom. 2013;14:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao Y., Wang K., He Y., Wang Y., Qu C., Miao J. The complete chloroplast genome of Spartina alterniflora. Mitochondrial DNA B. 2020;5:2440–2441. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1776173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Y., Xie W., Cao J., He Y., Zhao Y., Qu C., Miao J. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sporobolus alterniflorus (loisel.) PM Peterson & Saarela (Poaceae) and phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA B. 2021;6:1303–1305. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1907248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matheson P., McGaughran A. Genomic data is missing for many highly invasive species, restricting our preparedness for escalating incursion rates. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:13987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17937-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li C., Wang B., Ji Y., Huang L., Wang X., Zhao W., Wang H., Yao Y. Mitochondrial genome provides species-specific targets for the rapid detection of early invasive populations of Hylurgus ligniperda in China. BMC Genom. 2024;25:90. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10011-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang D., Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Zhu J., Yu J. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: A toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genom. Proteom. Bioinf. 2010;8:77–80. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(10)60008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doalla R., Posada D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marçais G., Delcher A.L., Phillippy A.M., Coston R., Salzberg S.L., Zimin A. MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2018;14:e1005944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang X.C., Chen H., Yang D., Liu C. Diversity of mitochondrial plastid DNAs (MTPTs) in seed plants. Mitochondrial DNA A. 2018;29:635–642. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2017.1334772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hurst L.D. The Ka/Ks ratio: Diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 2002;18:486–487. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02722-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang J., Park S., Gil H.Y., Pak J.H., Kim S.C. Characterization and dynamics of intracellular gene transfer in plastid genomes of Viola (Violaceae) and order Malpighiales. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:678580. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.678580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Filip E., Skuza L. Horizontal gene transfer involving chloroplasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4484. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Leister D., Kleine T. Role of intercompartmental DNA transfer in producing genetic diversity. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011;291:73–114. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386035-4.00003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martin W. Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: Frequent and in big chunks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:8612–8614. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633606100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou P., Zhang Q., Li F., Huang J., Zhang M. Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Ilex metabaptista (Aquifoliaceae), a Chinese endemic species with a narrow distribution. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23:393. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04377-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lu G., Zhang K., Que Y., Li Y. Assembly and analysis of the first complete mitochondrial genome of Punica granatum and the gene transfer from chloroplast genome. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1132551. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1132551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cheng Y., He X., Priyadarshani S.V.G.N., Wang Y., Ye L., Shi C., Ye K., Zhou Q., Luo Z., Deng F., et al. Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Suaeda glauca. BMC Genom. 2021;22:167. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07490-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qiao Y., Zhang X., Li Z., Song Y., Sun Z. Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Bupleurum chinense DC. BMC Genom. 2022;23:664. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08892-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shen B., Shen A., Liu L., Tan Y., Li S., Tan Z. Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete multichromosomal mitochondrial genome of Cymbidium ensifolium, an orchid of high economic and ornamental value. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24:255. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04962-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jethva J., Lichtenauer S., Schmidt-Schippers R., Steffen-Heins A., Poschet G., Wirtz M., van Dongen J.T., Eirich J., Finkemeier I., Bilger W., et al. Mitochondrial alternative NADH dehydrogenases NDA1 and NDA2 promote survival of reoxygenation stress in Arabidopsis by safeguarding photosynthesis and limiting ROS generation. New Phytol. 2023;238:96–112. doi: 10.1111/nph.18657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Faivre-Nitschke S.E., Nazoa P., Gualberto J.M., Grienenberger J.M., Bonnard G. Wheat mitochondria ccmB encodes the membrane domain of a putative ABC transporter involved in cytochrome c biogenesis. BBA-Gene Struct. Expr. 2001;1519:199–208. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4781(01)00239-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences of complete mitogenomes of S. alterniflora can be available in NCBI (accession number: MT311317).


Articles from Current Issues in Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES